Chủ đề về những ngày đáng nhớ với bạn bè là một trong những đề tài quen thuộc và được yêu thích nhất trong IELTS Speaking. Đây không chỉ là cơ hội để bạn chia sẻ những kỷ niệm đẹp mà còn là dịp để thể hiện khả năng sử dụng ngôn ngữ tự nhiên, sinh động về các sự kiện trong quá khứ.
Tần suất xuất hiện
Những gì bạn sẽ học được
Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ được trang bị:
- 10+ câu hỏi thường gặp trong cả 3 Part liên quan đến chủ đề bạn bè và kỷ niệm
- Bài mẫu chi tiết theo 3 mức band điểm khác nhau (6-7, 7.5-8, 8.5-9) với phân tích cụ thể
- 30+ từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm được native speakers sử dụng thường xuyên
- Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của examiner chính thức
- Những lỗi điển hình mà học viên Việt Nam thường mắc phải và cách khắc phục
IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview
Tổng Quan Về Part 1
Part 1 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn gọn về cuộc sống hàng ngày và các chủ đề quen thuộc. Đặc điểm nổi bật của phần này là câu hỏi thường xoay quanh kinh nghiệm cá nhân, sở thích, và thói quen sinh hoạt. Chiến lược hiệu quả nhất là trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, sau đó mở rộng ý với 1-2 câu giải thích hoặc ví dụ cụ thể.
Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 1:
- Trả lời quá ngắn chỉ với Yes/No hoặc một từ đơn lẻ
- Sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “nice”, “happy” mà không có từ đồng nghĩa
- Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ trải nghiệm bản thân
- Không sử dụng các cụm từ tự nhiên để bắt đầu câu trả lời
Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp
Question 1: Do you have many close friends?
Question 2: How often do you meet up with your friends?
Question 3: What do you usually do when you hang out with friends?
Question 4: Do you prefer spending time with friends or family?
Question 5: How did you meet your best friend?
Question 6: Have you kept in touch with friends from childhood?
Question 7: Do you think it’s important to see friends regularly?
Question 8: What makes a good friend in your opinion?
Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết
Question: Do you have many close friends?
🎯 Cách tiếp cận:
- Trả lời trực tiếp về số lượng bạn thân
- Giải thích lý do tại sao có nhiều/ít bạn thân
- Có thể thêm ví dụ về quality vs quantity
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
Not really. I have maybe 3 or 4 close friends that I trust. I think it’s better to have a few good friends than many friends who don’t really understand you. I’ve known most of them since high school.
Phân tích:
Điểm mạnh:
- Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi với số lượng cụ thể
- Có giải thích về quan điểm cá nhân
- Sử dụng cấu trúc so sánh đơn giản
Hạn chế:
- Từ vựng còn basic (good friends, understand you)
- Thiếu từ nối tự nhiên để bắt đầu
- Chưa có ví dụ cụ thể về bạn bè
Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời đủ ý, mạch lạc nhưng từ vựng chưa đa dạng và thiếu tính tự nhiên trong cách diễn đạt. Ngữ pháp đúng nhưng đơn giản.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
Well, I wouldn’t say I have a large circle of close friends. I’d say there are around four people I consider to be really close to me. I’m quite selective when it comes to forming deep friendships because I believe quality definitely trumps quantity in relationships. Most of these friendships have stood the test of time – we’ve been through thick and thin together since our university days, which makes our bond pretty unbreakable.
Phân tích:
Điểm mạnh:
- Bắt đầu tự nhiên với “Well” và “I wouldn’t say” thể hiện sự suy nghĩ
- Từ vựng đa dạng và chính xác: selective, forming deep friendships, trumps, bond
- Sử dụng thành ngữ tự nhiên: stood the test of time, through thick and thin
- Cấu trúc câu phức tạp với mệnh đề quan hệ và phân từ
- Giải thích sâu sắc về triết lý cá nhân
Tại sao Band 8-9: Câu trả lời thể hiện sự tự nhiên của người nói thành thạo, với từ vựng tinh tế, cấu trúc đa dạng và ý tưởng được phát triển tốt. Pronunciation cần rõ ràng với trọng âm đúng trên các cụm từ quan trọng.
💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:
- selective (adj): kỹ tính, có chọn lọc khi đưa ra quyết định
- forming deep friendships: xây dựng tình bạn sâu sắc
- trump (v): vượt trội hơn, quan trọng hơn
- stand the test of time: vượt qua thử thách của thời gian
- through thick and thin: cùng nhau trải qua khó khăn và thuận lợi
- bond (n): sự gắn kết, mối quan hệ gắn bó
Question: What do you usually do when you hang out with friends?
🎯 Cách tiếp cận:
- Đưa ra 2-3 hoạt động cụ thể
- Giải thích tại sao thích những hoạt động đó
- Có thể phân biệt theo các dịp khác nhau
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
We usually go to cafes or restaurants to eat and talk. Sometimes we watch movies together or go shopping. On weekends, we might go to the park or play sports if the weather is nice. I think eating together is our favorite activity.
Phân tích:
Điểm mạnh:
- Liệt kê được nhiều hoạt động cụ thể
- Có đề cập đến yếu tố thời gian (weekends) và điều kiện (weather)
- Cấu trúc câu đúng ngữ pháp
Hạn chế:
- Từ vựng đơn giản và lặp lại (go to, play)
- Thiếu chi tiết về trải nghiệm cá nhân
- Chưa có linking words tự nhiên
Tại sao Band 6-7: Trả lời đầy đủ với nhiều ý nhưng cách diễn đạt còn đơn điệu, thiếu sự linh hoạt trong từ vựng.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
It really depends on our mood and schedules. Most commonly, we’d grab a bite to eat at some trendy cafe or restaurant while catching up on each other’s lives. We’re all quite food-oriented, so exploring new dining spots is definitely our thing. On special occasions, we might organize a mini road trip to nearby beaches or mountains – those spontaneous adventures always create the most memorable moments. What I appreciate most is that we don’t need elaborate plans; even just lounging around at someone’s place and having heart-to-heart conversations can be incredibly fulfilling.
Phân tích:
Điểm mạnh:
- Bắt đầu với “It really depends” cho thấy tư duy linh hoạt
- Từ vựng phong phú và idiomatic: grab a bite, catching up, food-oriented, heart-to-heart
- Cấu trúc câu đa dạng với mệnh đề phân từ và relative clause
- Thể hiện cảm xúc và sở thích cá nhân rõ ràng
- Sử dụng semicolon để nối ý một cách tinh tế
Tại sao Band 8-9: Câu trả lời tự nhiên như người bản ngữ, với vocabulary range rộng, grammar structures phức tạp chính xác, và ideas được phát triển một cách có chiều sâu.
💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:
- depends on: phụ thuộc vào
- grab a bite (to eat): ăn nhanh, ăn vặt
- trendy (adj): hợp thời trang, đang là xu hướng
- catch up on: trò chuyện để cập nhật thông tin
- food-oriented (adj): có xu hướng thích ăn uống
- mini road trip: chuyến đi ngắn ngày bằng xe
- lounge around: thư giãn, nghỉ ngơi một cách thoải mái
- heart-to-heart conversation: cuộc trò chuyện thật lòng, sâu sắc
- fulfilling (adj): mang lại sự thỏa mãn, trọn vẹn
Question: Have you kept in touch with friends from childhood?
🎯 Cách tiếp cận:
- Trả lời có/không một cách trực tiếp
- Giải thích lý do duy trì hoặc mất liên lạc
- Có thể đề cập đến vai trò của công nghệ
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
Yes, I still talk to some friends from primary school. We use social media like Facebook to stay connected. We don’t meet often because we live in different cities now, but we message each other sometimes. It’s nice to have old friends who knew you when you were young.
Phân tích:
Điểm mạnh:
- Trả lời rõ ràng có duy trì liên lạc
- Đề cập cụ thể đến phương tiện (Facebook)
- Có giải thích về khoảng cách địa lý
Hạn chế:
- Từ vựng basic (talk to, stay connected, nice)
- Thiếu cảm xúc và chi tiết cá nhân
- Cấu trúc câu đơn giản
Tại sao Band 6-7: Đủ thông tin nhưng diễn đạt chưa tinh tế, từ vựng còn đơn điệu.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
Actually, I’m quite fortunate to still be in close contact with a handful of friends from my childhood. Despite the fact that life has taken us in different directions geographically, we make a conscious effort to stay connected through social media and regular video calls. I’d say technology has been a game-changer in this aspect. What’s special about these friendships is the shared history we have – they’ve witnessed my awkward phases and formative years, which creates a unique bond that’s hard to replicate with people you meet later in life. We try to have a proper reunion at least once or twice a year, and it’s amazing how we just pick up where we left off, as if no time has passed at all.
Phân tích:
Điểm mạnh:
- Từ vựng sophisticated: fortunate, conscious effort, game-changer, formative years, replicate
- Cấu trúc phức tạp với despite, relative clauses, và as if clause
- Ý tưởng sâu sắc về giá trị của tình bạn lâu dài
- Sử dụng thành ngữ tự nhiên: pick up where we left off
- Thể hiện cảm xúc chân thực
Tại sao Band 8-9: Câu trả lời phong phú về mặt ngôn ngữ và ý tưởng, thể hiện khả năng diễn đạt như người thành thạo tiếng Anh với vocabulary chính xác, grammar đa dạng và ideas có chiều sâu.
💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:
- fortunate (adj): may mắn
- be in close contact with: giữ liên lạc thường xuyên với
- life has taken us in different directions: cuộc sống đã đưa chúng tôi đi những hướng khác nhau
- conscious effort: nỗ lực có ý thức, cố gắng một cách chủ động
- game-changer (n): yếu tố làm thay đổi hoàn toàn tình hình
- shared history: lịch sử chung, những trải nghiệm chung
- awkward phases: giai đoạn vụng về, khó xử
- formative years: những năm tháng định hình nhân cách
- unique bond: sự gắn kết độc đáo
- proper reunion: buổi gặp gỡ đàng hoàng, chính thức
- pick up where we left off: tiếp tục từ nơi đã dừng lại
Nhóm bạn trẻ vui vẻ tham gia các hoạt động ngoài trời thể hiện tầm quan trọng của tình bạn trong IELTS Speaking Part 1
IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)
Tổng Quan Về Part 2
Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để thể hiện khả năng nói liên tục và mạch lạc. Đặc điểm nổi bật là bạn phải tự phát triển ý tưởng mà không bị examiner ngắt lời.
Chiến lược hiệu quả:
- Sử dụng tối đa 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi chú keywords cho mỗi bullet point
- Không viết câu hoàn chỉnh, chỉ ghi từ khóa để nhớ
- Nói ít nhất 1.5 phút, tốt nhất là 2 phút trở lên
- Phải trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points trong đề
- Với đề về quá khứ, nhất quán sử dụng thì past tense
Lỗi thường gặp:
- Không tận dụng hết thời gian chuẩn bị hoặc không ghi chú gì
- Nói quá ngắn, dưới 1.5 phút
- Bỏ qua một hoặc nhiều bullet points
- Lạc đề, nói về điều khác không liên quan
Cue Card
Describe a memorable day you had with friends
You should say:
- When and where this day took place
- Who you were with
- What you did together
- And explain why this day was so memorable for you
Phân Tích Đề Bài
Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an event/experience – kể về một sự kiện hoặc trải nghiệm trong quá khứ
Thì động từ: Past tenses (past simple, past continuous, past perfect) vì đây là sự kiện đã xảy ra
Bullet points phải cover:
- When and where: Thời gian cụ thể (tháng/năm) và địa điểm cụ thể
- Who: Những người bạn nào tham gia, có thể mô tả sơ qua tính cách
- What you did: Các hoạt động diễn ra trong ngày, cần chi tiết và theo trình tự thời gian
- Why memorable: Đây là phần quan trọng nhất, cần giải thích cảm xúc và ý nghĩa
Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là phần ghi điểm cao nhất vì yêu cầu bạn phân tích, suy ngẫm về ý nghĩa của trải nghiệm, không chỉ kể lại sự kiện. Examiner muốn nghe bạn giải thích cảm xúc, tầm quan trọng, và tại sao kỷ niệm này nổi bật so với những ngày khác.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7
Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút
I’d like to talk about a memorable day I spent with my close friends last summer. It was in July, and we went to Vung Tau beach for a day trip.
I was with three of my best friends from university. We have been friends for about four years, and we don’t see each other very often now because we work in different companies.
On that day, we woke up very early, around 5 AM, and drove to Vung Tau. The journey took about two hours. When we arrived, the beach was still quite empty. We rented some chairs and an umbrella, then we went swimming in the sea. The water was cool and refreshing. After that, we had breakfast at a small restaurant near the beach. We ordered seafood and local specialties.
In the afternoon, we took many photos together and walked along the beach. We talked about our jobs, our lives, and our memories from university. We also played some games on the beach like volleyball. In the evening, we watched the sunset together before driving back to the city.
This day was memorable for me because I felt very relaxed and happy. It’s rare for all of us to have free time together. I enjoyed spending quality time with my friends without thinking about work or other problems. The beautiful scenery and the fun activities made it a perfect day. It reminded me of how important friendship is in life.
Phân Tích Band Điểm
| Tiêu chí | Band | Nhận xét |
|---|---|---|
| Fluency & Coherence | 6-7 | Câu chuyện có trình tự logic theo thời gian. Sử dụng một số linking words cơ bản (after that, in the afternoon). Có vài chỗ lặp lại ý (we, our) nhưng không ảnh hưởng nhiều đến hiểu |
| Lexical Resource | 6-7 | Từ vựng đủ để diễn đạt ý, có một số collocations tốt (day trip, quality time, beautiful scenery). Tuy nhiên còn dùng nhiều từ đơn giản và lặp lại (very, good) |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 6-7 | Sử dụng đúng past tenses. Có một số câu phức với because, when. Đa số là câu đơn giản. Không có lỗi ngữ pháp nghiêm trọng |
| Pronunciation | 6-7 | Giả định phát âm rõ ràng, có thể hiểu được, với trọng âm cơ bản đúng |
Điểm mạnh:
- ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points trong đề
- ✅ Có cấu trúc rõ ràng theo trình tự thời gian
- ✅ Sử dụng đúng thì quá khứ xuyên suốt
- ✅ Có giải thích về tại sao đáng nhớ ở cuối
Hạn chế:
- ⚠️ Từ vựng chưa đa dạng, còn nhiều từ cơ bản (very, good, nice)
- ⚠️ Thiếu idiomatic expressions và advanced vocabulary
- ⚠️ Cấu trúc câu đơn giản, ít variation
- ⚠️ Phần giải thích cảm xúc chưa sâu sắc
📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8
Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút
I’d like to describe a particularly memorable day I spent with my closest friends, which took place last August during a spontaneous road trip to Da Lat, a charming hill station in the Central Highlands of Vietnam.
I was accompanied by four of my long-time friends from university – we’ve known each other for roughly six years now. Although we’re all caught up in our respective careers these days, we make it a point to get together at least once every few months to maintain our bond.
The day itself was quite action-packed. We set off at the crack of dawn, around 5:30 AM, hoping to beat the traffic and catch the sunrise from one of Da Lat’s famous viewpoints. The drive was absolutely breathtaking – watching the landscape transform from urban sprawl to lush pine forests as we climbed higher into the mountains. Once we arrived, we grabbed a quick bite at a local cafe before embarking on a mini adventure to some hidden waterfalls that one of my friends had discovered online.
What made the day truly special was the spontaneous nature of everything. We hadn’t planned much in advance, so we just went with the flow. We spent hours exploring off-the-beaten-path locations, taking countless photos, and just having a good laugh about everything and nothing. In the evening, we found this cozy little homestay where we sat around a bonfire, sharing stories and reminiscing about our university days.
This day stands out in my memory for several reasons. Firstly, it was a much-needed break from the daily grind – we all lead pretty hectic lives, so having that time to completely disconnect and unwind was incredibly rejuvenating. More importantly, though, it reinforced how valuable these friendships are to me. In today’s fast-paced world, it’s easy to lose touch with people, but days like this remind you that some relationships are worth making time for, no matter how busy you get.
Phân Tích Band Điểm
| Tiêu chí | Band | Nhận xét |
|---|---|---|
| Fluency & Coherence | 7.5-8 | Trôi chảy với minimal hesitation. Sử dụng linking devices hiệu quả (although, once, firstly, more importantly). Ý được phát triển logic và coherent |
| Lexical Resource | 7.5-8 | Vocabulary range rộng với nhiều collocations tự nhiên (crack of dawn, beat the traffic, went with the flow). Có paraphrasing tốt. Một số less common words (rejuvenating, hectic) |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 7.5-8 | Sử dụng variety of complex structures (relative clauses, participle clauses, inversion). Kiểm soát tốt past tenses với past perfect. Ít lỗi nhỏ không ảnh hưởng communication |
| Pronunciation | 7.5-8 | Giả định có word stress và sentence stress tốt, intonation tự nhiên |
So Sánh Với Band 6-7
| Khía cạnh | Band 6-7 | Band 7.5-8 |
|---|---|---|
| Vocabulary | “went to Vung Tau beach”, “very early” | “spontaneous road trip”, “at the crack of dawn”, “charming hill station” |
| Grammar | “We woke up very early” (simple past) | “We set off at the crack of dawn, hoping to beat the traffic” (past simple + present participle) |
| Ideas | “I felt very relaxed and happy” | “It was a much-needed break from the daily grind”, “incredibly rejuvenating”, “reinforced how valuable these friendships are” |
| Depth | Mô tả sự kiện đơn giản | Phân tích ý nghĩa sâu sắc hơn về friendship và work-life balance |
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9
Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ
I’d like to recount what I consider to be one of the most unforgettable days I’ve ever experienced with my friends – a spur-of-the-moment excursion to Phu Quoc Island that took place last September, right at the tail end of summer.
The cast of characters for this adventure included five of my dearest companions, people I’ve been thick as thieves with since our undergraduate years. Despite the fact that adult life has thrown us in different directions – some working in finance, others in tech, and one even pursuing a PhD abroad – we’ve always been adamant about keeping our friendship alive through regular meetups.
The day unfolded in the most serendipitous way imaginable. We’d initially planned just a simple beach outing, but one thing led to another, and before we knew it, we’d impulsively booked last-minute flights to Phu Quoc. The entire experience had this wonderfully liberating quality to it – there was something almost therapeutic about throwing caution to the wind and just going for it without overthinking.
Once we landed, we didn’t waste a moment. We immediately rented motorbikes and set off to explore the island’s hidden gems – pristine beaches that haven’t yet been overrun by tourists, quaint fishing villages where time seemed to stand still, and this absolutely breathtaking sunset spot that we stumbled upon purely by chance. The highlight, though, was probably when we got completely and utterly lost trying to find a restaurant, which somehow turned into this hilarious adventure where we ended up having dinner at a local family’s home – they were incredibly hospitable and insisted we join them.
What makes this day particularly poignant for me is the profound sense of connection I felt. In our everyday lives, we’re all so consumed by our individual pursuits – career progression, personal goals, various obligations – that we rarely get the chance to simply be present with the people who matter most. That day reminded me of something I’d almost forgotten: the irreplaceable value of authentic human connection. There was this palpable sense of joy and freedom that permeated everything we did, from the mundane act of riding motorbikes to the more meaningful moments of vulnerability and openness we shared during our late-night conversations on the beach.
Looking back, I realize this wasn’t just a fun day out – it was a powerful reminder of the sustaining force that genuine friendship can be. In a world that’s becoming increasingly digitized and superficial, having people who truly understand you, who’ve witnessed your evolution as a person, and who accept you warts and all – that’s something truly invaluable. This experience reinforced my conviction that no matter how demanding life gets, nurturing these relationships should always remain a non-negotiable priority.
Phân Tích Band Điểm
| Tiêu chí | Band | Nhận xét |
|---|---|---|
| Fluency & Coherence | 8.5-9 | Hoàn toàn fluent và coherent. Develops topics fully với sophisticated cohesive devices. Tự nhiên như native speaker. No noticeable hesitation |
| Lexical Resource | 8.5-9 | Wide vocabulary range với precise usage. Nhiều idiomatic expressions (thick as thieves, throwing caution to the wind, warts and all). Natural collocations. Sophisticated và precise |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 8.5-9 | Full range of structures với complete flexibility và accuracy. Complex sentences với multiple clauses. Perfect control of tenses và aspects. Virtually error-free |
| Pronunciation | 8.5-9 | Giả định native-like pronunciation với perfect stress, rhythm và intonation. Clear và effortless to understand |
Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc
🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói không có dấu hiệu hesitation hay repetition. Mỗi ý được nối với nhau một cách seamless thông qua các discourse markers tinh tế. Cách kể chuyện có dramatic arc rõ ràng: setup → buildup → climax → reflection.
📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:
Ví dụ 1: “spur-of-the-moment excursion” thay vì “spontaneous trip” – đây là cách native speakers nói một cách tự nhiên và sophisticated hơn.
Ví dụ 2: “thick as thieves with” – idiom này perfectly captures mức độ thân thiết, cho thấy người nói có command tốt về idiomatic English.
Ví dụ 3: “palpable sense of joy” – adjective “palpable” (có thể cảm nhận được) là từ vựng academic nhưng được dùng tự nhiên trong spoken context.
Ví dụ 4: “warts and all” – idiom này (chấp nhận ai đó với mọi khuyết điểm) thể hiện cultural knowledge và natural English usage.
📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:
Ví dụ 1: “Despite the fact that adult life has thrown us in different directions” – Complex sentence với despite + noun clause + present perfect, thể hiện sophisticated grammar control.
Ví dụ 2: “There was something almost therapeutic about throwing caution to the wind” – Sử dụng “there was something…about + V-ing” là pattern rất natural của native speakers để express feelings.
Ví dụ 3: “This wasn’t just a fun day out – it was a powerful reminder” – Sử dụng dash để emphasize, cho thấy understanding về punctuation trong speaking.
💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Thay vì chỉ mô tả sự kiện, bài nói phân tích philosophical dimension của friendship: “In a world that’s becoming increasingly digitized and superficial” – shows awareness of broader social context. Kết luận với personal conviction về “nurturing relationships” as “non-negotiable priority” thể hiện mature thinking và personal values.
Hành trình du lịch đáng nhớ cùng bạn bè minh họa cho IELTS Speaking Part 2 describe a memorable day
Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)
Examiner thường hỏi 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2 để transition sang Part 3:
Question 1: Would you like to have more days like this with your friends?
Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, definitely. I really enjoyed that day and I hope we can do similar trips in the future. It’s good for our friendship and helps us relax from work stress.
Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely, I’d jump at the chance to recreate experiences like that. In fact, we’ve already been tentatively planning another getaway, though coordinating everyone’s schedules has proven to be quite the challenge. I think these shared experiences are what keep friendships vibrant and meaningful over time.
Question 2: Do you think such experiences bring friends closer together?
Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I think so. When you spend time together and do fun things, you understand your friends better and your relationship becomes stronger. It creates good memories that last forever.
Band 8-9 Answer:
Undoubtedly. I’d even go so far as to say these kinds of experiences are fundamental to maintaining deep friendships. There’s something about stepping out of your routine and sharing novel experiences that breaks down barriers and fosters genuine connection. It’s during these moments that you really get to see different facets of people’s personalities that might not come to light in everyday interactions.
IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion
Tổng Quan Về Part 3
Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi mang tính thảo luận, phân tích sâu về chủ đề đã đề cập trong Part 2. Đây là phần khó nhất và phân biệt rõ ràng giữa các band điểm cao và trung bình.
Đặc điểm:
- Câu hỏi trừu tượng, yêu cầu phân tích, so sánh, đánh giá
- Không còn nói về bản thân mà về xã hội, xu hướng chung
- Cần đưa ra quan điểm có lý lẽ và xem xét nhiều góc độ
Yêu cầu:
- Phát triển ý sâu hơn với analysis và evaluation
- Support quan điểm bằng examples từ xã hội, không chỉ cá nhân
- Thừa nhận complexity và đưa ra balanced view
- Sử dụng abstract vocabulary và complex structures
Chiến lược:
- Mỗi câu trả lời nên 3-5 câu (30-45 giây)
- Bắt đầu với discourse markers: Well, I think, In my view
- Structure: Direct answer → Reason/Explanation → Example/Evidence → Conclusion/Nuance
- Không sợ nói “It depends” hoặc “There are different perspectives”
Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:
- Trả lời quá ngắn như Part 1
- Không có analysis, chỉ state opinion
- Thiếu examples concrete từ society
- Không acknowledge complexity của issue
- Dùng từ vựng quá simple, không academic enough
Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu
Theme 1: Friendship in Modern Society
Question 1: How has technology changed the way people maintain friendships nowadays?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Compare (so sánh quá khứ và hiện tại) + Cause-Effect (technology → impact)
- Key words: technology, changed, maintain friendships, nowadays
- Cách tiếp cận: So sánh before/after technology → đưa ra positive và negative impacts → conclude với balanced view
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
Technology has changed friendship a lot. In the past, people had to meet face-to-face to talk, but now we can use social media and messaging apps to stay in touch easily. This is convenient because we can contact friends anytime, even if they live far away. However, I think sometimes people spend too much time on their phones instead of meeting in person. This can make friendships less deep. So technology has both good and bad effects on friendship.
Phân tích:
Structure: Có comparison và mention cả positive/negative nhưng còn surface-level
Vocabulary: Basic words (changed a lot, convenient, good and bad) thiếu academic vocabulary
Tại sao Band 6-7: Có idea và structure cơ bản nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated language. Thiếu specific examples và analysis sâu.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
Well, I’d say technology has been both a blessing and a curse when it comes to maintaining friendships. On the positive side, it’s democratized communication in ways that were unimaginable just a generation ago. People can now stay connected with friends across continents through video calls, instant messaging, and social media platforms, which has been particularly invaluable for those who’ve relocated for work or study. I have friends who’ve moved abroad, and without apps like WhatsApp or Zoom, we’d probably have drifted apart by now.
However, there’s a paradox here that’s worth acknowledging. While we’re more connected than ever in a superficial sense, there’s a growing concern that these digital interactions lack the depth and authenticity of face-to-face communication. We might have hundreds of Facebook friends, but how many of those are people we could turn to in a crisis? There’s also the issue of what psychologists call “phubbing” – phone snubbing – where people are physically together but mentally absent, scrolling through their devices instead of engaging meaningfully with those present.
Ultimately, I think technology is simply a tool – its impact on friendship depends entirely on how we choose to use it. The key is finding a healthy balance between leveraging technology to maintain distant relationships while still prioritizing quality time with friends in person.
Phân tích:
Structure: Well-organized với clear progression: Introduction → Positive aspects + example → Negative aspects + analysis → Balanced conclusion
Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise: democratized, invaluable, paradox, phubbing, leveraging. Sử dụng topic-specific terms và academic vocabulary tự nhiên.
Grammar: Complex structures: relative clauses (that were unimaginable), conditional (without apps…we’d have drifted apart), passive voice, inversion trong conclusion.
Critical Thinking: Shows nuanced understanding với acknowledgment of paradox, reference to psychological research, và balanced view. Không extreme về positive hay negative.
💡 Key Language Features:
Discourse markers: Well, On the positive side, However, Ultimately
Tentative language: I’d say, there’s a growing concern that, might have
Abstract nouns: blessing and a curse, paradox, superficial sense, depth and authenticity
Hedging devices: simply, depends entirely on, the key is finding
Question 2: Do you think people have fewer close friends now compared to the past?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Opinion + Compare (now vs. past)
- Key words: fewer close friends, now, compared to the past
- Cách tiếp cận: State position → explain reasons với social changes → provide evidence/examples → acknowledge other views
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
I think yes, people nowadays have fewer close friends than before. One reason is that modern life is very busy. People have to work long hours and don’t have much free time to spend with friends. Also, many people move to different cities for work, so they lose contact with old friends. In the past, people stayed in the same place and knew their friends for a long time. Young people today prefer to stay at home and use social media instead of going out to meet friends in real life.
Phân tích:
Structure: Clear position với some reasons, but analysis còn basic
Vocabulary: Simple vocabulary (very busy, long hours, lose contact, stay at home)
Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response với relevant ideas nhưng thiếu sophistication trong language và depth trong analysis.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9:
That’s a really thought-provoking question, and I think the answer is more nuanced than a simple yes or no. I’d argue that it’s not so much about having fewer close friends, but rather that the nature and definition of close friendship has evolved.
If we look at traditional communities, people often had lifelong friendships that were almost circumstantial – they grew up in the same neighborhood, attended the same school, and their social circles were largely predetermined by geography. These friendships were deep partly because people had limited options and spent extensive face-time together out of necessity rather than choice.
In contrast, contemporary society is characterized by unprecedented mobility and choice. People relocate frequently for education and career opportunities, which inevitably disrupts established social networks. However, I’d contend that the friendships people deliberately cultivate in this context might actually be more intentional and meaningful. When you can connect with anyone globally, the friends you choose to invest time and energy in represent a genuine alignment of values and interests, rather than just geographical convenience.
That said, there’s a legitimate concern about social atomization. Sociological studies suggest that people today report feeling more socially isolated despite being more connected technologically. The decline of third places – those informal gathering spots like cafes, community centers, or local pubs where people naturally congregate – has certainly eroded opportunities for organic friendship formation. Coupled with the time pressures of modern life and the siren call of digital entertainment, it’s understandable why deep, consistent friendships might be harder to sustain.
So, to circle back to your question, I don’t think it’s a straightforward case of having fewer close friends. Rather, we’re navigating a fundamentally different social landscape where friendship requires more deliberate cultivation but can also be more authentically chosen.
Phân tích:
Structure: Sophisticated structure: Reframe question → Historical comparison → Contemporary analysis → Acknowledge concerns → Nuanced conclusion. Shows examiner-level understanding.
Vocabulary: Academic và precise: thought-provoking, nuanced, circumstantial, predetermined, unprecedented, atomization, eroded, siren call, organic formation
Grammar: Full range: passive constructions, conditional sentences, relative clauses, cleft sentences (“it’s not so much about…but rather”). Perfectly controlled complex structures.
Critical Thinking: Shows intellectual sophistication: challenges the premise of question, provides historical context, references sociological studies, acknowledges complexity, offers balanced perspective. Không simplistic.
💡 Key Language Features:
Academic vocabulary: nature and definition has evolved, contemporary society, sociological studies, social atomization, organic friendship formation
Hedging and nuance: I’d argue, more nuanced than, I’d contend, That said, might be harder
Discourse markers: If we look at, In contrast, However, That said, So to circle back
Complex ideas: decline of third places, time pressures of modern life, deliberately cultivate, genuine alignment of values
Theme 2: Social Changes and Relationships
Question 3: Why do some friendships last a lifetime while others fade away?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Cause-Effect (explain reasons)
- Key words: last a lifetime, fade away (contrast)
- Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple factors → explain each với examples → conclude với synthesis
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
There are several reasons why some friendships last long and others don’t. First, if friends have similar interests and personalities, they will stay friends longer. Also, effort is important. If both people try to keep in touch and make time for each other, the friendship will survive. Distance can be a problem too. When friends live far away, it’s harder to maintain the relationship. Sometimes people change as they grow older and their values become different, so they naturally grow apart.
Phân tích:
Structure: Lists reasons systematically but without deep analysis
Vocabulary: Adequate but basic (stay friends, keep in touch, grow apart)
Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points adequately nhưng lacks sophistication và depth of analysis.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9:
This is something I’ve pondered quite a bit, actually, and I believe it boils down to several interrelated factors.
At the core, I think lasting friendships are built on what I’d call “mutual evolution” – the ability of both parties to grow and change while still maintaining a fundamental compatibility. Think about it: we’re all constantly evolving as individuals – our values shift, our priorities realign, our worldviews become more refined. Friendships that endure are those where this evolution happens in complementary rather than divergent directions. It’s not about staying static, but about growing together or at least respecting and accommodating each other’s growth.
Equally crucial is what psychologists call “emotional equity” – the balanced investment that both parties make in the relationship. Friendships are essentially reciprocal arrangements; when one person is consistently doing all the heavy lifting – initiating contact, making plans, showing interest – while the other remains passive or indifferent, resentment inevitably builds up, and the friendship atrophies. Sustainable friendships require mutual effort and a genuine commitment to showing up for each other, especially during challenging times.
Life circumstances obviously play a significant role as well. Physical proximity, while less critical in our hyper-connected age, still matters. There’s an irreplaceable quality to in-person interaction that digital communication simply cannot replicate. Moreover, major life transitions – career changes, relocation, marriage, parenthood – can either strengthen or strain friendships depending on how both parties navigate these changes. Some friendships prove resilient through these transitions, while others, particularly those that were more situational or convenience-based to begin with, naturally run their course.
Perhaps most fundamentally, though, I believe lasting friendships require what I’d describe as “authentic vulnerability” – the willingness to be genuine, to share not just the highlights but also the struggles, to allow yourself to be truly known. Friendships that remain surface-level – where conversations never venture beyond pleasant small talk – tend to be more fragile and easier to abandon when life gets complicated. In contrast, relationships where people have been vulnerable and authentic with each other develop a depth and resilience that can weather various storms.
Phân tích:
Structure: Exceptionally well-organized với clear topic development: Introduction → Factor 1 (mutual evolution) → Factor 2 (emotional equity) → Factor 3 (life circumstances) → Factor 4 (authentic vulnerability). Each point được develop fully.
Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: pondered, boils down to, interrelated factors, mutual evolution, fundamental compatibility, reciprocal arrangements, atrophies, hyper-connected age, navigate, situational, run their course, authentic vulnerability, weather storms
Grammar: Native-like complexity: relative clauses, conditional structures, participle phrases, parallel structures. Perfectly controlled.
Critical Thinking: Shows philosophical depth và psychological understanding. References psychological concepts naturally. Provides nuanced analysis of complex social phenomenon.
💡 Key Language Features:
Academic phrases: At the core, Equally crucial, Perhaps most fundamentally, what psychologists call
Metaphorical language: all the heavy lifting, grow together, run their course, weather storms, doing the heavy lifting
Precise vocabulary: mutual evolution, emotional equity, reciprocal arrangements, authentic vulnerability, atrophies, hyper-connected age
Complex sentence structures: “Friendships that endure are those where this evolution happens in complementary rather than divergent directions” – shows native-like syntactic sophistication
Theme 3: Cultural and Generational Perspectives
Question 4: Do you think attitudes towards friendship differ between younger and older generations?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Compare + Opinion (generational differences)
- Key words: attitudes towards friendship, differ, younger and older generations
- Cách tiếp cận: Establish differences → explain causes (social/technological changes) → provide examples → conclude with implications
📝 Sample Answer – Band 7-8:
Yes, I definitely think there are noticeable differences in how different generations approach friendship. From what I’ve observed, older generations tend to place greater emphasis on long-term, stable friendships. They often have a smaller circle of friends, but these relationships are usually very deep and enduring. Many older people I know have maintained friendships from their childhood or youth that have lasted decades.
In contrast, younger people today seem to have broader but perhaps more fluid social networks. This is partly due to social media, which enables them to maintain connections with a much larger number of people than was possible before. However, there’s a trade-off here – while they might have hundreds of online friends, the depth of these connections is often questionable.
Another key difference is in how friendships are initiated and maintained. Older generations typically formed friendships through physical proximity – neighbors, classmates, colleagues – and maintained them through regular face-to-face interaction. Younger generations, however, are comfortable forming friendships online with people they may never meet in person. They’re also more accustomed to maintaining friendships primarily through digital communication.
I’d say both approaches have their merits and drawbacks, and neither is inherently superior to the other.
Phân tích:
Structure: Clear comparison structure với older generation → younger generation → methods difference → balanced conclusion
Vocabulary: Good range: noticeable differences, place greater emphasis on, enduring, fluid social networks, trade-off, questionable depth, physical proximity, inherently superior
Grammar: Mix of simple and complex structures với good control
Tại sao Band 7-8: Well-developed response với clear comparisons và examples, nhưng có thể deeper trong analysis và more sophisticated vocabulary.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9:
That’s a fascinating question that really touches on some profound shifts in our social landscape. I’d argue that generational attitudes towards friendship differ quite substantially, and these differences are largely symptomatic of broader socio-technological transformations.
If we look at older generations – baby boomers and even Generation X – friendship was typically grounded in what sociologists call “high-context relationships”. These were connections forged through sustained, in-person interaction within relatively bounded communities. There was an implicit understanding that friendships were long-term commitments that required consistent nurturing. The scarcity of communication options actually reinforced this – when connecting with someone required considerable effort, people were more selective and intentional about whom they invested in.
Millennials and Gen Z, by contrast, have come of age in what the sociologist Manuel Castells calls the “network society”. For them, friendship is more fluid, diverse, and digitally mediated. They’re adept at maintaining what anthropologist Robin Dunbar would call “weak ties” – peripheral connections that nonetheless hold value for information exchange and social capital building. The paradox here is that while their social networks are exponentially larger, research suggests they may actually have fewer intimate confidants than previous generations did at the same age.
There’s also an interesting divergence in what different generations seek from friendship. Older individuals often prioritize reliability and loyalty – friends are people who “show up” during life’s inevitable hardships. Younger people, while certainly valuing these qualities, also tend to emphasize shared interests, authenticity, and what you might call “vibe compatibility”. They’re more willing to let friendships naturally evolve or dissolve without viewing this as a personal failure or breach of commitment.
What’s particularly intriguing is how these attitudinal differences reflect contrasting life circumstances. Older generations often experienced greater residential stability and more predictable life trajectories, which facilitated long-term friendships. Today’s young people face unprecedented social mobility, economic uncertainty, and delayed life milestones, which inevitably shape how they conceptualize and practice friendship. They’ve had to adapt to a reality where friends might be scattered across continents and where life phases are more fragmented and fluid.
Ultimately, I don’t think either approach is objectively better – they’re simply adaptive responses to different social environments. The challenge for contemporary society might be finding ways to preserve the depth and loyalty characteristic of traditional friendships while embracing the diversity and flexibility that modern connectivity offers.
Phân tích:
Structure: Examiner-quality structure: Acknowledge complexity → Older generation analysis → Younger generation analysis → What each values → Why differences exist → Thoughtful conclusion. Fully developed ideas với excellent coherence.
Vocabulary: Academic và sophisticated: symptomatic of, socio-technological transformations, grounded in, high-context relationships, forged through, implicit understanding, network society, digitally mediated, adept at, weak ties, peripheral connections, exponentially larger, intimate confidants, attitudinal differences, residential stability, life trajectories, fragmented and fluid, adaptive responses
Grammar: Native-level complexity: relative clauses, conditional structures, passive voice, inversion, participle phrases, cleft sentences. Flawless control.
Critical Thinking: Demonstrates intellectual depth: references sociologists (Castells, Dunbar), uses theoretical frameworks, provides historical context, analyzes causation, acknowledges paradoxes, offers nuanced conclusion. Shows academic sophistication.
💡 Key Language Features:
Academic references: “what sociologists call”, “Manuel Castells calls the ‘network society'”, “anthropologist Robin Dunbar”
Abstract concepts: high-context relationships, weak ties, social capital building, attitudinal differences, adaptive responses, socio-technological transformations
Hedging language: I’d argue, largely symptomatic of, tend to emphasize, might be scattered, don’t think either approach is objectively better
Discourse markers: If we look at, by contrast, There’s also, What’s particularly intriguing, Ultimately
Sự khác biệt giữa các thế hệ trong cách duy trì tình bạn cho IELTS Speaking Part 3
Theme 4: The Value and Challenges of Friendship
Question 5: What are the most important qualities people look for in a friend?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Opinion (identify and explain qualities)
- Key words: most important qualities, look for, friend
- Cách tiếp cận: Identify 2-3 key qualities → explain each with reasoning → acknowledge variations → conclude
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
I think the most important quality in a friend is trust. You need to trust your friends and know that they will not tell your secrets to others. Another important quality is loyalty. A good friend should support you and be there for you when you have problems. Honesty is also very important. Friends should tell you the truth, even if it’s not what you want to hear. Finally, I think a good friend should be fun to be with and have a good sense of humor. These qualities make friendship strong and lasting.
Phân tích:
Structure: Lists qualities systematically but without deep exploration
Vocabulary: Basic but appropriate: trust, loyalty, honesty, sense of humor, strong and lasting
Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers relevant qualities adequately nhưng lacks sophistication trong analysis and expression.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9:
I think this really varies depending on individual personality and life stage, but there are certain universal qualities that tend to consistently rank highly.
First and foremost, I’d say trustworthiness is absolutely fundamental. This encompasses several dimensions – confidentiality, certainly, but also reliability and predictability. You need to know that a friend will keep your confidences, but equally that they’ll follow through on commitments and be there when it counts. Without this foundational trust, any friendship remains superficial, because you can never truly let your guard down or be vulnerable.
Equally vital, in my view, is what I’d call “empathetic understanding” – not just the ability to sympathize when things go wrong, but a deeper capacity to truly comprehend your perspective and emotional reality. The difference between sympathy and empathy is crucial here. A sympathetic friend might say “I’m sorry you’re going through this,” whereas an empathetic friend will actually put themselves in your shoes and understand not just what you’re experiencing but why it affects you the way it does. This kind of emotional intelligence creates a profound connection.
I’d also highlight authenticity as increasingly important, particularly for younger generations. People are growing weary of performative relationships where everyone is curating a carefully filtered version of themselves. There’s something deeply refreshing about friends with whom you can be completely genuine – who’ve seen you at your absolute worst and most vulnerable, and still accept and value you. This permission to be imperfect is actually quite liberating.
Interestingly, while shared interests often serve as the initial catalyst for friendship, research suggests they’re actually less critical to long-term friendship satisfaction than these deeper character qualities. You and a friend might diverge in your hobbies and preferences over time, but if you share core values and maintain mutual respect and understanding, the friendship can endure and evolve.
That said, I should acknowledge that what people prioritize in friendships definitely shifts with life circumstances. Young adults might value friends who are adventurous and spontaneous, while parents of young children might especially appreciate friends who are understanding about scheduling constraints. Older adults might particularly cherish reliability and consistency, having witnessed how rare true loyalty can be.
Phân tích:
Structure: Sophisticated development: Acknowledge variation → Quality 1 (trust) with full explanation → Quality 2 (empathy) với nuanced distinction → Quality 3 (authenticity) với social context → Research-based insight → Acknowledge life-stage variations. Comprehensive và well-developed.
Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: encompasses several dimensions, foundational trust, let your guard down, empathetic understanding, emotional intelligence, growing weary of, performative relationships, curating, permission to be imperfect, serve as initial catalyst, diverge, endure and evolve
Grammar: Expert-level: complex conditionals, relative clauses, passive constructions, participle phrases, cleft sentences. Native-like fluency.
Critical Thinking: Shows psychological depth: distinguishes sympathy vs empathy, references research, acknowledges life-stage variations, challenges common assumptions về shared interests. Demonstrates intellectual maturity.
💡 Key Language Features:
Sophisticated distinctions: “sympathy vs empathy”, “what vs why”, “initial catalyst vs long-term satisfaction”
Academic vocabulary: encompasses several dimensions, empathetic understanding, emotional intelligence, performative relationships, diverge, endure and evolve
Hedging and qualification: I think this really varies, tend to consistently rank, I’d say, Interestingly, That said
Discourse structure: First and foremost, Equally vital, I’d also highlight, Interestingly, That said
Question 6: Is it possible to maintain close friendships when living in different countries?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Opinion + Problem-Solution
- Key words: possible, maintain close friendships, different countries
- Cách tiếp cận: State position (yes with challenges) → explain challenges → discuss solutions/enabling factors → personal/societal examples → balanced conclusion
📝 Sample Answer – Band 7-8:
Yes, I believe it’s definitely possible to maintain close friendships across countries, though it certainly requires more effort than local friendships. Technology has made this much easier than it used to be. With video calls, messaging apps, and social media, friends can stay in regular contact despite the distance.
However, there are challenges. Time zone differences can make it difficult to find convenient times to talk. Also, when you don’t see someone face-to-face regularly, you might miss out on the small everyday moments that help keep friendships strong. There’s also the risk of gradually growing apart because you’re not sharing the same daily experiences.
I think the friendships that survive distance are usually the stronger ones to begin with. They require both parties to make a genuine effort to stay connected and to be understanding when life gets busy. Setting regular times to catch up, visiting each other when possible, and making the effort to stay updated on each other’s lives all help. So while it’s not easy, it’s certainly possible if both people are committed.
Phân tích:
Structure: Clear structure: State position → Explain how technology helps → Discuss challenges → Explain success factors → Conclusion
Vocabulary: Good range: maintain, across countries, time zone differences, growing apart, survive distance, genuine effort, committed
Grammar: Good control of conditionals, relative clauses, và complex sentences
Tại sao Band 7-8: Well-developed response với good analysis and examples, nhưng có thể more sophisticated trong vocabulary và deeper trong philosophical exploration.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9:
Absolutely, though I’d qualify that by saying it’s possible but fundamentally different from geographically proximate friendships, and success depends on several nuanced factors.
On the surface, technology has seemingly obliterated geographical barriers. We can video call instantaneously, share real-time updates through social media, and maintain what appears to be constant communication. In this sense, the logistical obstacles that once made long-distance friendships nearly impossible to sustain have been largely mitigated. I have friends scattered across three continents, and we stay remarkably connected through weekly video calls and daily messaging.
However, and this is crucial, there’s a qualitative difference between digital connection and physical presence that we shouldn’t underestimate. Meaningful friendships are built not just through planned conversations but through spontaneous interactions, shared mundane experiences, and physical presence during significant moments. When you can’t just drop by a friend’s place on a whim, or be there in person when they’re going through something difficult, the relationship inevitably takes on a different character. Research in social psychology suggests that physical co-presence creates bonds that digital interaction, no matter how frequent, can’t entirely replicate because it lacks the sensory richness and emotional immediacy of face-to-face encounter.
What I’ve observed in my own international friendships is that success really hinges on what I’d call “intentional cultivation”. These friendships require explicit effort and deliberate prioritization that local friendships might sustain more organically. You need to schedule calls rather than rely on casual encounters, proactively share life updates rather than assume the other person will pick up on things naturally, and make financial and time commitments to visit when possible. This intentionality can actually strengthen certain friendships – it filters for relationships where both parties genuinely value the connection.
That said, I think certain types of friendships are more resilient to distance than others. Deep, intellectually engaging friendships where you discuss ideas, share creative projects, or provide emotional support can often transcend physical distance quite well. Friendships that were more activity-based – centered around regularly doing things together – tend to be more vulnerable when that shared activity is no longer possible. Similarly, friendships at different life stages face varying challenges – young professionals might find it easier to maintain long-distance friendships than parents of young children who are consumed by immediate, local demands.
In essence, I’d say maintaining close international friendships is possible but requires reimagining what closeness means. It’s less about physical proximity and frequency of interaction, and more about emotional availability, mutual investment, and the quality of connection when you do interact. Some of my most meaningful friendships are with people I see perhaps once a year, but when we connect, there’s an immediate depth and understanding that many of my more frequent acquaintances lack.
Phân tích:
Structure: Exemplary structure: Acknowledge possibility with qualification → Technology’s role → Critical analysis of limitations → Personal insights về intentionality → Type-based analysis → Philosophical conclusion. Shows examiner-level thinking.
Vocabulary: Expert-level: obliterated geographical barriers, logistical obstacles, qualitative difference, physical co-presence, sensory richness, emotional immediacy, intentional cultivation, resilient, transcend, reimagining, emotional availability
Grammar: Native-like sophistication: complex conditionals, relative clauses, participle phrases, inversion, cleft sentences. Flawless control of all structures.
Critical Thinking: Demonstrates intellectual depth: references social psychology research, makes nuanced distinctions (digital vs physical, activity-based vs idea-based friendships), acknowledges life-stage factors, challenges conventional wisdom, offers philosophical perspective. Shows postgraduate-level analytical thinking.
💡 Key Language Features:
Academic vocabulary: geographically proximate, seemingly obliterated, logistical obstacles, qualitative difference, sensory richness, emotional immediacy, intentional cultivation, resilient, transcend
Research references: “Research in social psychology suggests…”
Sophisticated qualifications: I’d qualify that, On the surface, However and this is crucial, That said, In essence
Philosophical depth: “reimagining what closeness means”, “less about…and more about…”
Nuanced categorization: “certain types of friendships”, “activity-based vs intellectually engaging”
Từ Vựng và Cụm Từ Quan Trọng
Topic-Specific Vocabulary
| Từ vựng/Cụm từ | Loại từ | Phiên âm | Nghĩa tiếng Việt | Ví dụ | Collocation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| memorable | adj | /ˈmemərəbl/ | đáng nhớ, khó quên | That was the most memorable day of my life. | memorable experience/moment/occasion/day |
| bond | n | /bɒnd/ | sự gắn kết, mối liên hệ | We share a strong bond that has lasted for years. | strong/close/special/unbreakable bond, form/develop/strengthen a bond |
| catch up | phrasal v | /kætʃ ʌp/ | trò chuyện để cập nhật thông tin | We need to catch up over coffee soon. | catch up with someone, catch up on news/gossip |
| hang out | phrasal v | /hæŋ aʊt/ | dành thời gian cùng nhau một cách thoải mái | We used to hang out at the mall every weekend. | hang out with friends, hang out together |
| close-knit | adj | /kləʊs nɪt/ | gắn bó chặt chẽ | We’re a close-knit group of friends. | close-knit community/group/family/circle |
| companionship | n | /kəmˈpæniənʃɪp/ | tình bạn, sự đồng hành | I value their companionship greatly. | seek/enjoy/offer/provide companionship |
| drift apart | phrasal v | /drɪft əˈpɑːt/ | xa cách dần, mất liên lạc | We drifted apart after university. | gradually drift apart, tend to drift apart |
| heart-to-heart | adj/n | /hɑːt tə hɑːt/ | thật lòng, sâu sắc (cuộc trò chuyện) | We had a heart-to-heart conversation last night. | heart-to-heart conversation/talk/chat |
| keep in touch | phrase | /kiːp ɪn tʌtʃ/ | giữ liên lạc | We’ve kept in touch since high school. | keep in close/regular touch, stay/remain in touch |
| long-standing | adj | /lɒŋ ˈstændɪŋ/ | lâu dài, tồn tại từ lâu | It’s a long-standing friendship. | long-standing friendship/relationship/tradition |
| mutual | adj | /ˈmjuːtʃuəl/ | lẫn nhau, qua lại | We have mutual respect for each other. | mutual respect/trust/understanding/interest/friend |
| reliable | adj | /rɪˈlaɪəbl/ | đáng tin cậy | She’s a reliable friend I can count on. | reliable friend/person/source, highly/completely reliable |
| reunion | n | /riːˈjuːniən/ | cuộc đoàn tụ, gặp lại | We’re planning a school reunion next month. | family/school/class reunion, attend/organize a reunion |
| spontaneous | adj | /spɒnˈteɪniəs/ | tự phát, bất chợt | It was a spontaneous decision to take the trip. | spontaneous decision/trip/gesture, be spontaneous |
| strengthen | v | /ˈstreŋθən/ | củng cố, tăng cường | Shared experiences strengthen friendships. | strengthen bonds/relationships/ties/friendship |
| trustworthy | adj | /ˈtrʌstˌwɜːði/ | đáng tin cậy | He’s proven himself to be trustworthy. | trustworthy friend/person/source, completely/highly trustworthy |
| vulnerable | adj | /ˈvʌlnərəbl/ | dễ bị tổn thương, bộc lộ yếu điểm | She felt comfortable being vulnerable with them. | feel/be vulnerable, make yourself vulnerable |
| camaraderie | n | /ˌkæməˈrɑːdəri/ | tình bạn, tình đồng chí | There was a sense of camaraderie among us. | sense/spirit of camaraderie, develop/foster camaraderie |
| confide in | phrasal v | /kənˈfaɪd ɪn/ | tâm sự, tin tưởng chia sẻ | I can confide in her about anything. | confide in someone, confide your secrets/feelings/worries |
| reciprocal | adj | /rɪˈsɪprəkl/ | có đi có lại, qua lại | Friendship should be a reciprocal relationship. | reciprocal relationship/arrangement/agreement |
Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases
| Cụm từ | Nghĩa | Ví dụ sử dụng | Band điểm |
|---|---|---|---|
| thick as thieves | rất thân thiết, không thể tách rời | We’ve been thick as thieves since childhood. | 8-9 |
| through thick and thin | cùng nhau trải qua khó khăn và thuận lợi | They’ve supported each other through thick and thin. | 7-8 |
| see eye to eye | có cùng quan điểm, đồng ý với nhau | We don’t always see eye to eye, but we respect each other. | 7-8 |
| pick up where we left off | tiếp tục như chưa có gì thay đổi | Even after years apart, we can pick up where we left off. | 8-9 |
| stand the test of time | vượt qua thử thách thời gian | True friendships stand the test of time. | 7.5-8.5 |
| be there for someone | ở đó để hỗ trợ ai đó | I know she’ll be there for me when I need her. | 6-7 |
| birds of a feather | người cùng sở thích/tính cách | We’re birds of a feather – we both love adventure. | 7.5-8.5 |
| fair-weather friend | bạn chỉ chơi khi thuận lợi | He turned out to be a fair-weather friend. | 7.5-8.5 |
| kindred spirits | những người đồng điệu về tinh thần | We’re kindred spirits who understand each other deeply. | 8-9 |
| at the drop of a hat | ngay lập tức, không do dự | She’d help me at the drop of a hat. | 7.5-8.5 |
| go way back | quen biết nhau từ lâu | We go way back – we’ve been friends for 20 years. | 7-8 |
| hit it off | hợp nhau ngay từ đầu | We hit it off immediately when we first met. | 7-8 |
| a shoulder to cry on | người để tâm sự khi buồn | She’s always been a shoulder to cry on. | 7-8 |
| get along like a house on fire | rất hợp nhau, ăn ý | We got along like a house on fire from day one. | 8-9 |
| warts and all | chấp nhận cả ưu điểm và khuyết điểm | True friends accept you warts and all. | 8.5-9 |
Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)
Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:
- 📝 Well,… – Khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ hoặc tạo tính tự nhiên
- 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc thông tin bất ngờ
- 📝 To be honest,… – Khi nói thật lòng, thẳng thắn
- 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm có phần tentative
- 📝 In my view/opinion,… – Khi express personal perspective
Để bổ sung ý:
- 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, ngoài ra
- 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, thêm vào đó
- 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến, không nói đến
- 📝 Additionally/Furthermore,… – Hơn nữa (formal hơn)
- 📝 Another point worth mentioning is… – Một điểm đáng đề cập khác là
Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:
- 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
- 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng cũng cần xem xét
- 📝 Having said that,… – Tuy đã nói vậy, nhưng
- 📝 That said,… – Tuy nhiên, điều đó được nói ra
- 📝 By the same token,… – Tương tự như vậy
Để kết luận:
- 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, nhìn chung
- 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, xét cho cùng
- 📝 In essence,… – Về bản chất, tóm lại
- 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng, rốt cuộc
- 📝 To sum up/In summary,… – Tóm lại
Để thể hiện sự suy nghĩ:
- 📝 Let me think… – Để tôi nghĩ xem
- 📝 That’s an interesting question… – Đó là một câu hỏi thú vị
- 📝 I’ve never really thought about it, but… – Tôi chưa bao giờ thực sự nghĩ về điều đó, nhưng
- 📝 Now that you mention it,… – Giờ bạn nói tới điều đó thì
Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng
1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):
Mixed conditional:
- Formula: If + past perfect, would + base verb (hoặc ngược lại)
- Ví dụ: “If we hadn’t taken that spontaneous trip, we wouldn’t be as close as we are now.”
- Giải thích: Kết hợp điều kiện loại 3 (quá khứ) với kết quả loại 2 (hiện tại)
Inversion trong conditional:
- Formula: Had + subject + past participle, would have…
- Ví dụ: “Had I not met them, my life would have been completely different.”
- Giải thích: Dạng formal của câu điều kiện loại 3, tạo ấn tượng sophisticated
2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):
Non-defining relative clauses:
- Formula: …, which/who + verb, …
- Ví dụ: “My best friend, who I’ve known since primary school, has always been there for me.”
- Giải thích: Thêm thông tin không thiết yếu, tạo câu phức tạp và natural
Reduced relative clauses:
- Formula: Noun + V-ing/V-ed
- Ví dụ: “Friends sharing similar values tend to have longer-lasting relationships.”
- Giải thích: Rút gọn mệnh đề quan hệ, tạo sự concise
3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):
It is thought/believed/said that…
- Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that friendships formed in youth are often the strongest.”
- Giải thích: Passive structure để express general beliefs một cách academic
Having been + past participle:
- Ví dụ: “Having been friends for over a decade, we understand each other perfectly.”
- Giải thích: Perfect participle passive, thể hiện sự sequence of events
4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):
What I find most… is…
- Ví dụ: “What I find most valuable about friendship is the sense of belonging it provides.”
- Giải thích: Nhấn mạnh information bằng cách tách câu, rất natural trong speaking
The thing that… is…
- Ví dụ: “The thing that makes our friendship special is our ability to be completely honest with each other.”
- Giải thích: Tương tự như trên, focusing attention vào specific aspect
It’s… that…
- Ví dụ: “It’s the shared experiences that really strengthen friendships, not just time spent together.”
- Giải thích: Emphasize một phần của câu bằng cách tách ra
5. Inversion for Emphasis:
Not only… but also…
- Ví dụ: “Not only do we share similar interests, but we also have compatible personalities.”
- Giải thích: Đảo ngữ sau “not only” tạo emphasis, rất impressive
Seldom/Rarely/Never at beginning:
- Ví dụ: “Seldom have I met someone who understands me so well.”
- Giải thích: Đảo ngữ sau negative adverbs, tạo dramatic effect
6. Participle Clauses:
Present participle:
- Ví dụ: “Living in different cities, we’ve had to make extra effort to stay connected.”
- Giải thích: Expressing reason hoặc simultaneous action một cách concise
Perfect participle:
- Ví dụ: “Having experienced many challenges together, our friendship has become incredibly strong.”
- Giải thích: Showing one action happened before another, sophisticated structure
Tham khảo thêm về cách xử lý các chủ đề khó trong IELTS Speaking qua các bài viết liên quan như describe a time when you had to overcome a challenge at school, nơi bạn có thể học thêm cách kể về những trải nghiệm thử thách và phát triển bản thân.
Chiến Lược Tổng Thể và Lời Khuyên Từ Examiner
Chuẩn Bị Trước Kỳ Thi
1. Xây dựng ngân hàng câu chuyện cá nhân:
Thay vì học thuộc template, hãy chuẩn bị 5-7 câu chuyện thực tế về các kỷ niệm với bạn bè. Mỗi câu chuyện nên được xây dựng với đầy đủ details: thời gian, địa điểm, nhân vật, diễn biến, cảm xúc, và ý nghĩa. Điều quan trọng là những câu chuyện này phải authentic và bạn có thể kể một cách tự nhiên, không như đang đọc bài học thuộc.
2. Luyện tập với recording:
Ghi âm bản thân trả lời các câu hỏi và nghe lại. Chú ý đến:
- Fluency: Có quá nhiều pauses hay repetition không?
- Vocabulary: Có lặp từ quá nhiều không?
- Grammar: Có mắc lỗi gì thường xuyên không?
- Pronunciation: Có từ nào phát âm không rõ không?
3. Học từ vựng theo context:
Thay vì học từ riêng lẻ, học cả collocations và phrases. Ví dụ: thay vì chỉ học “memorable”, học luôn “memorable experience”, “memorable occasion”, “truly memorable”. Điều này giúp bạn sử dụng vocabulary một cách natural hơn.
Để có thêm góc nhìn về các hoạt động đáng nhớ khác, bạn có thể xem thêm describe a live sports match you have watched, giúp bạn mở rộng vocabulary về các trải nghiệm khác nhau.
Trong Phòng Thi
Chiến lược cho Part 1:
- Tránh câu trả lời một từ: Mỗi câu trả lời nên ít nhất 2-3 câu. Cấu trúc đơn giản: Direct answer → Reason/Explanation → Example (nếu phù hợp)
- Sử dụng discourse markers tự nhiên: Bắt đầu với “Well”, “Actually”, “To be honest” thay vì nhảy thẳng vào answer
- Mở rộng nhưng đừng quá dài: Part 1 không phải lúc để elaborate quá nhiều. Trả lời đủ ý trong 15-20 giây là ideal.
Chiến lược cho Part 2:
-
Tận dụng tối đa 1 phút preparation:
- Ghi keywords cho mỗi bullet point
- Đánh số thứ tự để không bỏ sót
- Ghi 2-3 từ vựng advanced bạn muốn dùng
- Không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
-
Cấu trúc bài nói:
- Introduction (5-10 giây): Giới thiệu tổng quan
- Body (90-120 giây): Trả lời đầy đủ các bullet points
- Conclusion (10-15 giây): Tóm tắt hoặc nhấn mạnh feeling
-
Kéo dài thời gian nếu cần:
- Thêm details về background information
- Mô tả cảm xúc chi tiết
- So sánh với các trải nghiệm khác
- Giải thích consequences hoặc impact
-
Nếu bị thiếu thời gian:
- Phần “explain” là quan trọng nhất, đừng bỏ qua
- Rút ngắn description nhưng giữ explanation
Chiến lược cho Part 3:
-
Không sợ pause để suy nghĩ: Câu hỏi Part 3 khó và abstract, examiner expects bạn cần thời gian. Sử dụng “That’s an interesting question”, “Let me think about that” để gain time.
-
Structure câu trả lời clearly:
- Direct answer ngay từ đầu
- Đưa ra 2-3 points với explanation
- Provide examples từ society, không chỉ personal
- Acknowledge complexity hoặc different perspectives
- Conclude với nuanced view
-
Show critical thinking:
- Sử dụng phrases như “On the one hand… On the other hand”
- “While it’s true that…, we also need to consider…”
- “It depends on…”
- “There are different perspectives on this”
-
Extend answers appropriately:
- Mỗi answer nên 30-45 giây (3-5 câu)
- Quá ngắn = thiếu development
- Quá dài = có thể off-topic hoặc repetitive
Nếu bạn quan tâm đến việc mở rộng vốn từ vựng về các mối quan hệ khác trong cuộc sống, hãy tham khảo describe a film character you would like to be friends with, nơi bạn có thể học cách miêu tả tính cách và mối quan hệ một cách sâu sắc hơn.
Lỗi Thường Gặp và Cách Khắc Phục
Lỗi 1: Học thuộc template và áp dụng cứng nhắc
Vấn đề: Examiner được training để nhận ra templates. Bài nói nghe không tự nhiên, thiếu personality.
Giải pháp:
- Học structures và useful phrases, nhưng personalize chúng
- Practice impromptu speaking về different topics
- Record và listen back – if it sounds unnatural to you, it will to examiner too
Lỗi 2: Sử dụng từ vựng quá phức tạp hoặc không phù hợp
Vấn đề: Dùng từ academic trong context không phù hợp, hoặc dùng sai collocation.
Giải pháp:
- Học từ vựng trong context và với collocations
- Ưu tiên natural expressions hơn overly complex words
- Check pronunciation của mọi từ mới
Lỗi 3: Thiếu examples và details
Vấn đề: Chỉ nói general statements không có specific examples.
Giải pháp:
- Mỗi point cần có example hoặc detail cụ thể
- Sử dụng “For instance”, “For example”, “Such as”
- Think of real experiences để examples sound authentic
Lỗi 4: Grammar errors ảnh hưởng communication
Vấn đề: Lỗi ngữ pháp cơ bản lặp lại nhiều lần (he/she, tenses, articles).
Giải pháp:
- Identify your common errors qua practice tests
- Focus correction vào 2-3 lỗi phổ biến nhất của bạn
- Self-correct nếu nhận ra lỗi ngay sau khi nói
Lỗi 5: Quá lo lắng về pronunciation hoàn hảo
Vấn đề: Nói quá chậm, over-enunciate, mất tính tự nhiên.
Giải pháp:
- Pronunciation không cần native-like, chỉ cần clear
- Focus vào word stress và sentence stress hơn là individual sounds
- Speak at a natural pace, đừng quá chậm
Tips Đặc Biệt Cho Học Viên Việt Nam
1. Vượt qua “safe zone”:
Nhiều học viên Việt Nam có tendency chỉ nói những gì chắc chắn đúng, leading to simple language. Hãy willing to take risks với advanced structures và vocabulary, even if không 100% sure. Examiner values ambition và range hơn perfect accuracy.
2. Develop natural speaking rhythm:
Tiếng Việt và tiếng Anh có rhythm rất khác nhau. Practice với podcasts, TED talks để absorb natural English rhythm. Pay attention to:
- Sentence stress (nhấn vào content words)
- Linking sounds giữa các từ
- Intonation patterns
3. Build confidence trong expressing opinions:
Văn hóa Việt Nam có xu hướng avoid direct disagreement hoặc strong opinions. Trong IELTS Speaking, bạn cần express clear opinions và defend them. Practice phrases like:
- “I strongly believe that…”
- “In my view,… and here’s why…”
- “I’d have to disagree with that perspective because…”
4. Don’t translate directly từ tiếng Việt:
Nhiều errors xuất phát từ translation trực tiếp. Thay vì translate, think in English. Nếu không biết express một idea, paraphrase hoặc explain it in simpler English thay vì translate từng từ.
Những Điều Không Nên Làm
❌ Không nên:
- Học thuộc answers hoàn chỉnh word-for-word
- Sử dụng idioms một cách forced hoặc không natural
- Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm một cách không tự nhiên
- Self-correct quá nhiều (chỉ correct major errors)
- Ask examiner to repeat questions nhiều lần
- Apologize for mistakes (“Sorry, my English is not good”)
- Give yes/no answers without explanation
- Go completely off-topic
- Argue with examiner hoặc challenge their questions
- Use overly informal language hoặc slang
✅ Nên:
- Be yourself và let your personality show
- Speak at a natural, comfortable pace
- Make eye contact with examiner
- Use discourse markers naturally
- Give full, developed answers
- Show enthusiasm về topics
- Correct yourself briefly if you catch a major error
- Ask for clarification nếu really don’t understand
- Vary your vocabulary và structures
- Speak clearly và confidently
Một chủ đề liên quan khác bạn có thể tham khảo là describe a time when you attended a special family event, giúp bạn mở rộng khả năng miêu tả các sự kiện đặc biệt trong cuộc sống với nhiều góc độ khác nhau.
Chiến lược luyện thi IELTS Speaking hiệu quả với sự hướng dẫn của giám khảo chuyên nghiệm
Lộ Trình Học Tập 4 Tuần
Tuần 1: Foundation Building
Ngày 1-2: Vocabulary Foundation
- Học 20 từ vựng core về friendship và relationships
- Tạo example sentences cho mỗi từ
- Practice pronunciation với online dictionaries
- Ghi âm pronunciation của bản thân và compare
Ngày 3-4: Part 1 Practice
- Trả lời 20 câu hỏi Part 1 về friends và social life
- Record answers và listen back
- Identify repetitive vocabulary và tìm alternatives
- Re-record với improvements
Ngày 5-6: Grammar Structures
- Review và practice 5 advanced structures
- Create own examples sử dụng những structures này
- Incorporate vào Part 1 answers
Ngày 7: Review và Self-Assessment
- Review tất cả vocabulary đã học
- Practice spontaneous answering (không preparation time)
- Identify areas cần improvement
Tuần 2: Part 2 Mastery
Ngày 1-3: Story Development
- Prepare 3 different memorable days với friends
- Develop each story với full details
- Practice telling each story multiple times
- Time yourself (aim for 2+ minutes)
Ngày 4-5: Vocabulary Enhancement
- Learn 15 advanced phrases và idioms
- Incorporate vào stories
- Practice với new vocabulary until natural
Ngày 6: Mock Part 2
- Simulate real exam conditions
- Record answers
- Analyze band score using descriptors
- Identify specific improvements needed
Ngày 7: Refinement
- Re-do recorded Part 2 với improvements
- Compare old và new versions
- Note progress
Tuần 3: Part 3 Development
Ngày 1-2: Question Types
- Study 20 Part 3 questions về friendship
- Categorize by type (opinion, compare, cause-effect, etc.)
- Learn appropriate structures for each type
Ngày 3-4: Critical Thinking
- Practice analyzing issues từ multiple perspectives
- Develop balanced arguments
- Learn tentative language và hedging devices
Ngày 5-6: Extended Answers
- Practice giving 40-60 second answers
- Structure: Direct answer → Explanation → Example → Nuance
- Record và evaluate structure
Ngày 7: Integration
- Practice full Part 3 (6-8 questions)
- Focus on coherence giữa answers
- Evaluate overall performance
Tuần 4: Full Integration và Polish
Ngày 1-2: Full Mock Tests
- Complete full Speaking test (Part 1-3)
- Record entire test
- Get feedback từ teacher hoặc partner nếu possible
- Self-evaluate using band descriptors
Ngày 3-4: Targeted Improvement
- Focus on weakest area identified trong mock test
- Intensive practice với that specific area
- Re-test that section
Ngày 5: Fluency Focus
- Practice speaking continuously về various topics
- Reduce hesitations và repetitions
- Work on natural discourse markers
Ngày 6: Confidence Building
- Practice với different question variations
- Develop flexibility trong answering
- Work on body language và eye contact
Ngày 7: Final Preparation
- Light review của key vocabulary
- Practice relaxation techniques
- Visualize success
- Get adequate rest
Để hiểu thêm về cách kể về các trải nghiệm du lịch đáng nhớ, một chủ đề thường xuất hiện cùng với describe a memorable day với friends, hãy xem describe a recent holiday that you enjoyed.
Kết Luận
Chủ đề “describe a memorable day you had with friends” là một đề tài vô cùng phổ biến và accessible trong IELTS Speaking, nhưng để đạt band điểm cao đòi hỏi nhiều hơn là chỉ kể lại một câu chuyện đơn giản. Sự khác biệt giữa band 6 và band 8+ nằm ở:
Vocabulary range và precision: Sử dụng collocations tự nhiên, idiomatic expressions appropriate, và topic-specific vocabulary thay vì general words.
Grammatical complexity và accuracy: Demonstrate wide range of structures với confident control, không chỉ simple sentences.
Fluency và coherence: Speak naturally với minimal hesitation, sử dụng discourse markers effectively để link ideas smoothly.
Ideas development: Không chỉ describe events mà analyze significance, reflect on meaning, và show depth of thinking, đặc biệt trong Part 3.
Authenticity: Examiners value genuine, personalized responses hơn memorized templates. Your unique perspective và real experiences sẽ make answers more compelling.
Hãy nhớ rằng IELTS Speaking test đánh giá communication ability, không phải perfect English. Mục tiêu là communicate ideas clearly, effectively, và naturally. Với preparation đúng cách, practice consistent, và confidence trong expressing yourself, bạn hoàn toàn có thể achieve band điểm mục tiêu.
Chúc bạn thành công trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking! Remember, every expert was once a beginner – the key is consistent practice và willingness to learn from mistakes. You’ve got this!
