IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề Describe a Person Who Has Been a Mentor to You – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Mở bài

Chủ đề về người mentor là một trong những đề bài phổ biến và có ý nghĩa sâu sắc trong IELTS Speaking. Đây là cơ hội để bạn kể về một người đã có ảnh hưởng tích cực đến sự phát triển của bản thân, dù là trong học tập, công việc hay cuộc sống. Examiner đánh giá cao những câu trả lời chân thực, thể hiện sự biết ơn và nhận thức rõ ràng về giá trị mà người mentor đã mang lại.

Theo thống kê từ các đề thi thực tế, chủ đề này xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong các kỳ thi IELTS từ năm 2020 đến 2024, đặc biệt trong Part 2. Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai vẫn ở mức cao do tính phổ biến và khả năng đánh giá toàn diện các kỹ năng của thí sinh.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được cách trả lời hiệu quả cho cả ba phần của IELTS Speaking Test, bao gồm các câu hỏi thường gặp từ Part 1 về role models và người có ảnh hưởng, một cue card chi tiết về mentor trong Part 2 với các bài mẫu từ band 6-7 đến 8.5-9, và các câu hỏi thảo luận sâu trong Part 3 về mentorship trong xã hội hiện đại. Bạn cũng sẽ được trang bị kho từ vựng phong phú, các cụm từ ăn điểm, và chiến lược trả lời từ góc nhìn của một examiner chính thức.

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về cuộc sống hàng ngày và những chủ đề quen thuộc. Đây là phần “warm-up” giúp bạn làm quen với examiner và tạo ấn tượng ban đầu. Chiến lược hiệu quả là trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, sau đó mở rộng bằng lý do hoặc ví dụ cụ thể trong 2-3 câu.

Học viên Việt Nam thường mắc phải các lỗi sau: trả lời quá ngắn gọn chỉ với “Yes” hoặc “No”, sử dụng từ vựng đơn giản lặp đi lặp lại, không đưa ra ví dụ thực tế từ cuộc sống, và sử dụng các cấu trúc ngữ pháp đơn điệu. Để đạt band điểm cao, bạn cần thể hiện khả năng giao tiếp tự nhiên, sử dụng từ vựng đa dạng và đưa ra những chi tiết cá nhân hóa câu trả lời.

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you have any role models in your life?

Question 2: Who has influenced you the most in your career/studies?

Question 3: Do you think it’s important to have someone to look up to?

Question 4: Have you ever given advice to someone younger than you?

Question 5: Do you prefer to learn from books or from experienced people?

Question 6: Who do young people in your country typically admire?

Question 7: Do you think parents should be role models for their children?

Question 8: Have you ever tried to follow someone’s footsteps?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you have any role models in your life?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có hay không
• Đưa ra tên người hoặc loại người
• Giải thích ngắn gọn tại sao họ là role model

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I have a role model. It’s my former teacher from high school. She taught me English and was very patient. She helped me improve my English a lot and I really respect her for that.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp, có ví dụ cụ thể (former teacher), đưa ra lý do (patient, helped improve English)
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng đơn giản (very patient, a lot), cấu trúc câu cơ bản, thiếu chi tiết cụ thể về ảnh hưởng
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời adequate và coherent nhưng chưa có vocabulary range rộng, chưa dùng complex grammar structures

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Absolutely! I’d say my former high school English teacher has been a tremendous role model for me. What really set her apart was her unwavering patience and her ability to instill confidence in students who struggled with the language. She didn’t just teach grammar and vocabulary; she fostered a genuine passion for learning, which has stayed with me throughout my academic journey.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng discourse marker tự nhiên (Absolutely! I’d say…), từ vựng sophisticated (unwavering patience, instill confidence, fostered a genuine passion), cấu trúc phức tạp (relative clause “who struggled”, past perfect “has stayed”), ý tưởng sâu sắc về impact dài hạn
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency tuyệt vời với linking natural, lexical resource đa dạng và precise, grammatical range phức tạp (mix of tenses), pronunciation rõ ràng với word stress chính xác, ý tưởng được phát triển đầy đủ

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• set someone apart: làm ai đó nổi bật, khác biệt
• unwavering patience: sự kiên nhẫn không lay chuyển
• instill confidence: thấm nhuần, tạo dựng sự tự tin
• foster a passion: nuôi dưỡng niềm đam mê

---

Question: Do you think it’s important to have someone to look up to?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đưa ra quan điểm rõ ràng (Yes/No hoặc It depends)
• Giải thích tại sao quan trọng hoặc không
• Đưa ra ví dụ hoặc lợi ích cụ thể

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think it’s very important. When you have someone to look up to, you can learn from their experience. They can give you advice and help you avoid mistakes. For example, my older brother helps me with career decisions.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Quan điểm rõ ràng, có giải thích logic (learn from experience, avoid mistakes), có ví dụ cụ thể
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng lặp lại (very important, help), cấu trúc đơn giản, chưa explore deeper benefits
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response với basic structure, từ vựng everyday language, chưa có sophistication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’d say it’s tremendously valuable to have someone you admire and aspire to emulate. Having a guiding figure provides you with a tangible example of success and helps you navigate life’s complexities more effectively. They serve as a benchmark for your own growth and can offer invaluable insights that only come from lived experience. Without such guidance, people often feel they’re stumbling in the dark, making avoidable mistakes that could have been circumvented with proper mentorship.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary tinh vi (tremendously valuable, emulate, navigate complexities, benchmark, circumvented), grammar phức tạp (relative clauses, gerunds, passive voice), ý tưởng multi-layered (tangible example, lived experience, avoiding mistakes), discourse markers tự nhiên
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Exceptional fluency với hesitation tối thiểu, lexical resource sophisticated và precise, grammatical structures varied và accurate, ideas well-developed với clear progression

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• aspire to emulate: khao khát noi theo, học hỏi
• guiding figure: hình mẫu dẫn dắt, người định hướng
• navigate life’s complexities: điều hướng những phức tạp trong cuộc sống
• lived experience: kinh nghiệm thực tế từ cuộc sống
• stumbling in the dark: loay hoay, mò mẫm trong bóng tối
• circumvented: tránh được, vượt qua

---

Question: Who do young people in your country typically admire?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nhận diện người được hỏi về general trend, không phải cá nhân
• Đưa ra 1-2 nhóm người cụ thể
• Giải thích tại sao họ được ngưỡng mộ

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Young people in Vietnam usually admire successful businesspeople and celebrities. Many young people follow famous singers or actors on social media. They also look up to entrepreneurs who built big companies because they want to be successful like them.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời đúng về general trend, đưa ra 2 nhóm người (celebrities và entrepreneurs), có lý do đơn giản
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng repetitive (successful, famous, big companies), thiếu specific examples, chưa có depth trong analysis
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate content nhưng lacks sophistication, vocabulary range hạn chế, ideas chưa được elaborate thoroughly

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’d say there’s quite a diverse spectrum of people that Vietnamese youth look up to these days. Predominantly, you’ll find them idolizing self-made entrepreneurs who’ve built thriving tech startups or pioneered new industries – people like VinGroup’s founder represent the archetypal rags-to-riches story that resonates deeply with ambitious young people. At the same time, there’s a significant following for social media influencers and entertainment figures, though I’d argue this admiration tends to be more superficial compared to the genuine respect accorded to those who’ve made substantial contributions to society.

Giới trẻ Việt Nam ngưỡng mộ các doanh nhân thành đạt và người có ảnh hưởng trên mạng xã hội trong IELTS Speaking

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary exceptionally sophisticated (diverse spectrum, idolizing, archetypal rags-to-riches story, resonates deeply, superficial vs genuine respect, substantial contributions), structure complex với multiple clauses, critical thinking evident (comparing different types of admiration), cultural specificity (VinGroup example), natural discourse markers
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Outstanding fluency với seamless idea flow, lexical resource wide-ranging và precise, grammar highly complex và accurate, ideas nuanced với contrasting perspectives, pronunciation clear với appropriate intonation

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• diverse spectrum: phổ rộng đa dạng
• self-made entrepreneurs: doanh nhân tự thân
• thriving tech startups: các startup công nghệ phát triển mạnh
• archetypal rags-to-riches story: câu chuyện điển hình từ nghèo khó đến giàu có
• resonates deeply: gây tiếng vang sâu sắc, chạm đến cảm xúc
• superficial: hời hợt, nông cạn
• substantial contributions: những đóng góp đáng kể

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị với giấy và bút để ghi chú. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để thể hiện khả năng nói liên tục, sử dụng từ vựng đa dạng và cấu trúc ngữ pháp phức tạp. Chiến lược hiệu quả là sử dụng hết 1 phút để ghi keywords (không viết câu hoàn chỉnh), sau đó nói đủ 2 phút bằng cách elaborate từng bullet point một cách chi tiết.

Học viên Việt Nam thường mắc các lỗi sau: không tận dụng hết thời gian chuẩn bị để brainstorm ý tưởng, nói quá ngắn (dưới 1.5 phút) do thiếu chi tiết, bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points trong đề bài, sử dụng thì động từ không nhất quán (nhất là khi kể về quá khứ), và thiếu conclusion tự nhiên. Để đạt band cao, bạn cần structure bài nói rõ ràng, phát triển ý tưởng đầy đủ, và sử dụng variety của tenses và vocabulary.

Cue Card

Describe A Person Who Has Been A Mentor To You

You should say:

• Who this person is
• How you met this person
• What this person taught you
• And explain why this person has been important in your life

Phân Tích Đề Bài

• Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person (mô tả về một người cụ thể)
• Thì động từ: Chủ yếu là quá khứ (how you met, what they taught) và hiện tại (who this person is, explain importance)
• Bullet points phải cover:
  • Thông tin cơ bản về người này (danh tính, vai trò, mối quan hệ)
  • Hoàn cảnh gặp gỡ (thời gian, địa điểm, bối cảnh)
  • Những gì họ dạy bạn (kiến thức, kỹ năng, giá trị sống)
  • Tầm quan trọng của họ (impact, influence, lasting effects)
• Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là phần ghi điểm cao nhất vì đòi hỏi critical thinking, reflection, và ability to articulate abstract ideas. Không chỉ nói “họ quan trọng” mà phải analyze HOW và WHY họ có impact như vậy đến cuộc đời bạn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about my former manager, Mr. Nguyen, who was a mentor to me. He is around 45 years old and has worked in the marketing field for more than 20 years.

I met him three years ago when I joined a digital marketing company as a junior employee. On my first day, he welcomed me warmly and showed me around the office. He was very friendly and made me feel comfortable in the new environment.

During the time I worked with him, he taught me many valuable things. First, he helped me understand how to create effective marketing campaigns. He explained the importance of understanding customer needs before designing any strategy. He also taught me how to work under pressure and meet tight deadlines. Whenever I made mistakes, he didn’t criticize me harshly. Instead, he pointed out what went wrong and helped me learn from it.

Mr. Nguyen has been very important in my life because he shaped my professional attitude. Before working with him, I was quite insecure about my abilities. He gave me confidence by trusting me with important projects. He also taught me that success comes from continuous learning and hard work. Even now, when I face difficulties at work, I remember his advice and try to apply what he taught me. He wasn’t just a boss but a true mentor who cared about my development.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Nói liên tục được khoảng 1.5-2 phút với ít hesitation, sử dụng basic linking words (first, also, because, instead) nhưng chưa có sophisticated discourse markers, ideas được present theo trình tự logic
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng adequate và appropriate (former manager, junior employee, effective campaigns, professional attitude), có một số collocations tốt (work under pressure, meet deadlines, continuous learning) nhưng còn repetitive ở một số chỗ (taught me, very important)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Mix của simple và complex sentences, sử dụng được relative clauses (who was a mentor), conditional (when I face difficulties), past và present tenses tương đối chính xác, nhưng thiếu variety of advanced structures
Pronunciation	6-7	Rõ ràng và dễ hiểu, word stress và sentence stress cơ bản đúng, intonation tự nhiên nhưng có thể còn ảnh hưởng nhẹ của L1 (Vietnamese)

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trong cue card
• ✅ Có structure rõ ràng với introduction, body, và conclusion
• ✅ Đưa ra ví dụ cụ thể (marketing campaigns, handling mistakes)
• ✅ Có personal reflection về impact (confidence, continuous learning)

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Thời lượng hơi ngắn so với yêu cầu 2-3 phút
• ⚠️ Từ vựng chưa đủ sophisticated, còn lặp từ
• ⚠️ Grammatical structures chưa đủ đa dạng và phức tạp
• ⚠️ Phần “explain why important” chưa được develop sâu với multiple dimensions

Tương tự như describe a person who is very resourceful at work, việc mô tả chi tiết về năng lực và đóng góp của người mentor sẽ giúp bài nói thêm thuyết phục và đạt band điểm cao hơn.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to tell you about Dr. Pham, my university lecturer, who has been an invaluable mentor throughout my academic journey. She’s a renowned researcher in environmental science, probably in her early fifties, with over 25 years of hands-on experience in both academia and field research.

I first crossed paths with her during my second year at university when I enrolled in her course on sustainable development. What initially struck me was her infectious enthusiasm for the subject – she had this unique ability to make even the most complex environmental issues feel relevant and urgent. After one particularly engaging lecture, I approached her to discuss a research idea, and that conversation marked the beginning of a mentorship that would profoundly shape my career path.

The lessons she’s imparted go far beyond textbook knowledge. On a practical level, she taught me how to conduct rigorous research, from formulating hypotheses to analyzing data critically. But more importantly, she instilled in me the importance of intellectual curiosity and ethical responsibility as a researcher. She constantly challenged me to think outside the box and to consider the real-world implications of my work. One thing that really stands out is how she encouraged me to embrace failure as a learning opportunity. When my first research proposal was rejected, instead of letting me feel discouraged, she helped me dissect the feedback and turn it into a stronger submission.

What makes Dr. Pham so significant in my life is the holistic impact she’s had on my personal and professional development. She didn’t just teach me academic skills; she modeled what it means to be a dedicated professional who balances ambition with integrity. Her mentorship gave me the confidence to pursue a master’s degree and eventually a career in environmental consultancy. Even now, years after graduating, I still seek her advice on major career decisions, and she continues to be a source of inspiration and wisdom. Without her guidance, I honestly don’t think I would have had the courage to venture into such a challenging field.

Giảng viên đại học đóng vai trò người hướng dẫn quan trọng trong câu chuyện IELTS Speaking Part 2

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Speaks fluently với minimal hesitation, sử dụng sophisticated discourse markers (What initially struck me, One thing that really stands out, Even now), ideas được organize logically với clear progression, cohesive devices varied và appropriate
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range của vocabulary (invaluable mentor, infectious enthusiasm, profoundly shape, intellectual curiosity, holistic impact), collocations natural và precise (hands-on experience, think outside the box, real-world implications), some idiomatic language (crossed paths with, stands out)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Wide range của structures including complex sentences với multiple clauses, past perfect (had had), conditionals (don’t think I would have), relative clauses, gerunds và infinitives used flexibly, errors rare và don’t impede communication
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear pronunciation với accurate word stress, good intonation patterns showing enthusiasm và reflection, sentence stress appropriate, minimal L1 influence

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“very friendly”, “taught me many things”, “very important”	“infectious enthusiasm”, “profoundly shape”, “holistic impact”, “source of inspiration”
Grammar	“He taught me how to work under pressure” (simple structure)	“She instilled in me the importance of intellectual curiosity and ethical responsibility” (complex noun phrase + parallel structure)
Ideas	Mentioned confidence và learning but not deeply explored	Detailed exploration of both practical skills (research methodology) và personal qualities (intellectual curiosity, ethical responsibility), với specific example về handling rejection

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to share with you the story of someone who has been instrumental in shaping who I am today – my former volleyball coach, Coach Linh, a truly exceptional mentor whose influence extends far beyond the confines of the sports arena.

Coach Linh is in her late thirties and has been involved in professional volleyball for nearly two decades, both as a national-level player and subsequently as a coach. What sets her apart isn’t just her impressive credentials, but her remarkable ability to nurture potential in athletes while instilling life-long values that transcend the sport itself.

Our paths first crossed when I was fifteen and at a crossroads in my athletic journey. I had just experienced a devastating loss in a regional championship, and honestly, I was on the verge of giving up volleyball entirely. A friend suggested I attend one of Coach Linh’s training camps, and somewhat reluctantly, I went. From the very first session, it was evident that she operated on a completely different wavelength. Rather than barking orders like most coaches I’d encountered, she took the time to understand each athlete’s psychological barriers and intrinsic motivations.

The lessons she imparted were multi-layered and profound. On the surface, yes, she revolutionized my technical skills – my serves became more powerful, my court awareness more acute, my teamwork more cohesive. But the true transformation occurred on a deeper level. Coach Linh taught me the art of resilient thinking – how to reframe setbacks as stepping stones rather than stumbling blocks. She introduced me to concepts like growth mindset and deliberate practice, which fundamentally altered my approach not just to sports, but to life’s challenges in general. One particularly pivotal moment came when I sustained an injury that sidelined me for three months. Instead of allowing me to wallow in self-pity, she worked with me to develop mental conditioning techniques and helped me see the injury as an opportunity to strengthen other aspects of my game.

What makes Coach Linh’s influence so profound is the ripple effect it’s had across every facet of my life. The discipline, perseverance, and strategic thinking she cultivated in me have proven invaluable in my academic pursuits and now in my professional career. She taught me that excellence isn’t a destination but a continuous journey of self-improvement. More importantly, she exemplified the type of leader I aspire to be – someone who empowers others to discover their own strength rather than imposing a one-size-fits-all approach. The confidence and self-belief she helped me develop during those formative years continue to sustain me through the inevitable challenges that life throws my way. I genuinely believe that without her mentorship, I would have settled for mediocrity rather than striving for excellence, not just in volleyball, but in everything I undertake. She didn’t just teach me how to play better; she taught me how to live purposefully, and that’s a gift that keeps on giving.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Speaks fluently với natural, effortless delivery, virtually no hesitation, sophisticated use of discourse markers và cohesive devices (From the very first session, On the surface, One particularly pivotal moment, What makes…so profound), ideas progress seamlessly với exceptional coherence, narrative engaging và well-structured
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Sophisticated và precise vocabulary used naturally (instrumental in shaping, transcend, at a crossroads, devastating loss, psychological barriers, multi-layered and profound, resilient thinking, ripple effect), wide range của idiomatic language (on the verge of, operate on a different wavelength, wallow in self-pity), collocations consistently appropriate (intrinsic motivations, growth mindset, deliberate practice, mental conditioning), paraphrasing skillful
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range của structures used flexibly và accurately, complex sentences với multiple subordinate clauses handled with ease, variety of tenses showing time relationships clearly (had just experienced, has been, would have settled), advanced structures (cleft sentences: What sets her apart, What makes…so profound; inversion patterns; participle clauses), errors extremely rare và do not detract
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Pronunciation features fully effective with clear articulation, appropriate word và sentence stress throughout, intonation patterns enhance meaning và show emotion effectively, pace varied for emphasis, L1 influence minimal to undetectable

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói flow naturally như đang kể chuyện cho bạn bè, không có awkward pauses hay repetitions. Discourse markers được sử dụng sophisticatedly để signal different parts của narrative (From the very first session dẫn vào first impression, On the surface transition sang deeper lessons, One particularly pivotal moment highlight key turning point).

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:
Ví dụ: “instrumental in shaping” (không chỉ là “important”) thể hiện agency và active influence; “transcend” (vượt qua, siêu việt) elevates meaning beyond simple “go beyond”; “at a crossroads” (ở ngã rẽ) là metaphor sophisticated cho difficult decision point; “multi-layered and profound” shows ability to articulate complexity; “ripple effect” là powerful metaphor cho lasting impact.

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:
Ví dụ: “Rather than barking orders like most coaches I’d encountered, she took the time to understand each athlete’s psychological barriers” – câu này demonstrates comparative structure, past perfect (I’d encountered), complex noun phrase (each athlete’s psychological barriers). “Without her mentorship, I would have settled for mediocrity rather than striving for excellence” – mixed conditional showing hypothetical past với consequence, parallel structure (settled for… striving for…).

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Không chỉ describe surface-level facts, bài nói explores psychological dimensions (psychological barriers, intrinsic motivations), introduces specific concepts (growth mindset, deliberate practice, mental conditioning), shows reflection on long-term impact (ripple effect across every facet of life), và demonstrates maturity trong understanding mentorship (empowers others vs imposing one-size-fits-all).

---

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2 để transition sang Part 3:

Question 1: Do you still keep in touch with this person?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I do. We message each other sometimes on social media. I also visit her when I have time.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely. We’ve maintained a close connection over the years – we keep in regular contact through video calls, and I make it a point to catch up with her in person whenever I’m back in my hometown. She’s still very much a guiding presence in my life.

---

Question 2: Would you like to become a mentor to others in the future?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I would like that. I think it would be nice to help younger people like my mentor helped me. I want to share my experience with them.

Band 8-9 Answer:
I’d absolutely relish the opportunity to pay it forward. Having experienced firsthand the transformative power of good mentorship, I feel a certain sense of responsibility to help others navigate their own journeys. I’m actually already informally mentoring a few junior colleagues, and it’s incredibly rewarding to see them grow and come into their own.

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi thảo luận abstract và complex hơn nhiều so với Part 1. Đây là phần examiner đánh giá khả năng analyze, evaluate, speculate, và present arguments của bạn. Không như Part 1 và 2 tập trung vào personal experience, Part 3 yêu cầu bạn discuss broader social issues, trends, và theoretical concepts liên quan đến chủ đề.

Để đạt điểm cao, bạn cần mở rộng câu trả lời thành 3-5 câu với structure rõ ràng: direct answer, elaboration với reasons/examples/comparisons, và possibly a balanced view or conclusion. Sử dụng discourse markers như “Well”, “Actually”, “I think” để có thời gian suy nghĩ tự nhiên. Đưa ra examples từ society và global context, không chỉ personal experience. Acknowledge complexity của issue bằng phrases như “It depends”, “There are multiple factors”, “On the one hand… on the other hand…”.

Học viên Việt Nam thường gặp khó khăn vì: trả lời quá ngắn thiếu elaboration, không đưa ra lý lẽ rõ ràng hỗ trợ quan điểm, thiếu từ vựng abstract và academic, không biết cách structure argument effectively, và sợ disagree hoặc present alternative viewpoints. Để cải thiện, practice discussing social issues, đọc opinion articles để học cách present arguments, và build vocabulary bank cho abstract concepts.

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: The Role of Mentorship in Society

---

Question 1: Why do you think mentorship is important in professional development?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Why question (đòi hỏi explanation về reasons/causes)
• Key words: mentorship, important, professional development
• Cách tiếp cận: Direct answer về tầm quan trọng → Explain multiple reasons với examples → Có thể mention consequences nếu không có mentorship

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think mentorship is very important for professional development. First, mentors have more experience, so they can teach younger workers useful skills and knowledge. They can also give advice about career choices and help people avoid mistakes. For example, when I started my first job, my mentor showed me how to work efficiently. Without mentorship, people might take longer to learn things and make more errors in their work.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có direct answer và several reasons, basic example từ personal experience
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng simple (very important, useful skills, work efficiently, make more errors)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Ideas relevant và coherent nhưng lacks depth, vocabulary range limited, chưa explore broader implications cho society/organizations

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Well, I’d argue that mentorship plays a pivotal role in professional development for several interconnected reasons. Firstly, mentors provide what I’d call “experiential shortcuts” – they help mentees navigate the complexities of their field by sharing hard-won insights that simply can’t be gleaned from textbooks or formal training. This accelerates the learning curve significantly and helps professionals avoid common pitfalls that might otherwise derail their careers.

Beyond the practical knowledge transfer, mentorship addresses the often-overlooked psychological dimension of professional growth. Having someone who believes in your potential and provides constructive feedback can be instrumental in building the confidence and resilience needed to tackle challenging projects or pursue ambitious goals. Moreover, mentors often serve as connectors, opening doors to valuable networks and opportunities that might otherwise remain inaccessible.

From a broader perspective, organizations that foster a culture of mentorship tend to see higher rates of employee retention and succession planning success. It creates a virtuous cycle where knowledge and values are perpetuated across generations of professionals, ultimately strengthening the organization’s overall capabilities.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized: Multiple dimensions explored (practical knowledge, psychological support, networking, organizational benefits), each với clear explanation
• Vocabulary: Precise and sophisticated (pivotal role, experiential shortcuts, hard-won insights, derail, psychological dimension, instrumental in, foster a culture, virtuous cycle, perpetuated)
• Grammar: Complex structures smoothly integrated (what I’d call, that simply can’t be gleaned, might otherwise remain inaccessible, organizations that foster)
• Critical Thinking: Multi-layered analysis showing understanding of individual, interpersonal, và organizational levels; acknowledges both practical và psychological aspects

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well (thinking time), Firstly, Beyond, Moreover, From a broader perspective (organizing ideas)
• Tentative language: I’d argue, I’d call, tend to (softening statements, sounding thoughtful)
• Abstract nouns: experiential shortcuts, psychological dimension, resilience, succession planning, virtuous cycle

---

Question 2: Do you think formal mentorship programs are better than informal mentoring relationships?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion/Compare (so sánh hai approaches)
• Key words: formal programs vs informal relationships, better
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge both sides (balanced view) → Compare advantages/disadvantages → Personal position (hoặc “it depends” với conditions)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think both types have advantages. Formal programs are good because they are organized and structured. The company matches mentors and mentees carefully. But informal relationships can be more natural and comfortable. People can choose mentors they like and trust. In my opinion, informal mentoring might be better because the relationship is more genuine and flexible.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Acknowledges both sides và gives opinion, nhưng comparison superficial
• Vocabulary: Basic language (good, organized, natural, comfortable, genuine)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Ideas present nhưng not fully developed, lacks specific examples hay deeper analysis of trade-offs

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

That’s an interesting question, and honestly, I don’t think there’s a clear-cut answer – it really depends on the context and what you’re trying to achieve.

Formal mentorship programs have some distinct advantages. They ensure that mentorship is democratized rather than being a privilege reserved for those who happen to know the right people. These programs typically come with clear objectives, structured frameworks, and accountability mechanisms that can make the mentoring process more purposeful and measurable. For instance, some companies incorporate formal mentoring into their talent development pipelines, which helps ensure consistency in how employees are groomed for leadership roles.

That said, informal mentoring relationships often have a quality of authenticity that’s hard to replicate in formal settings. When mentorship emerges organically from mutual respect and genuine connection, there’s typically a deeper level of trust and openness. The mentee feels more comfortable being vulnerable about their weaknesses, and the mentor is often more invested because they’ve chosen to take on that role rather than being assigned to it.

In an ideal scenario, I’d say organizations should strive to create environments where both can coexist. Formal programs can provide a safety net ensuring everyone has access to guidance, while still leaving room for organic relationships to develop naturally. The key is not to make formal mentoring so rigid that it stifles the spontaneous connections that often yield the most meaningful outcomes.

So sánh chương trình mentorship chính thức và các mối quan hệ tự nhiên trong môi trường công việc

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated approach: Acknowledge complexity → Present formal advantages với specific features → Present informal advantages với contrasting points → Synthesize với balanced conclusion về coexistence
• Vocabulary: Wide-ranging và precise (democratized, privilege reserved for, accountability mechanisms, emerges organically, mutual respect, being vulnerable, coexist, safety net, stifles, spontaneous connections)
• Grammar: Full range: relative clauses (that’s hard to replicate), conditionals (in an ideal scenario), cleft structures (The key is), participle clauses (leaving room for)
• Critical Thinking: Nuanced view acknowledging trade-offs, avoids simplistic either/or thinking, proposes integrated solution

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: That’s an interesting question, honestly, That said, In an ideal scenario, The key is
• Tentative language: I don’t think there’s a clear-cut answer, it really depends on, I’d say, often (showing flexibility)
• Hedging: typically, some, often (avoiding overgeneralization)
• Contrasting: That said, rather than, while still

---

Theme 2: Generational Differences in Mentorship

Question 3: How has the concept of mentorship changed between older and younger generations?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: How question về changes over time (so sánh generations)
• Key words: concept, mentorship, changed, older vs younger generations
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify key differences → Explain reasons for changes (technological, cultural, economic factors) → Provide examples → Possible implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Mentorship has changed a lot between generations. In the past, older people usually mentored younger ones in a traditional way, like teachers and students. Now, young people can also teach older people, especially about technology. The relationship is more equal now. Also, people use internet and social media to find mentors, not just people they know personally. This makes mentorship more flexible and convenient.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Identifies some differences (traditional vs modern, technology role, equality)
• Vocabulary: Simple descriptions (changed a lot, traditional way, more equal, flexible and convenient)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Basic comparison established nhưng lacks depth in analysis, reasons for changes not fully explored, examples generic

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

I’d say the landscape of mentorship has undergone a fundamental transformation across generations, driven largely by technological disruption and shifting workplace dynamics.

Traditionally, mentorship followed a very hierarchical model – it was predominantly top-down, with experienced professionals in senior positions guiding junior employees through a clearly defined career trajectory. The relationship was often formal, long-term, and geographically bound. Mentors were typically seen as repositories of wisdom who’d spent decades climbing the corporate ladder, and their advice centered around navigating institutional politics and conforming to established norms.

In contrast, today’s mentorship landscape is far more fluid and multidirectional. We’re seeing the rise of what’s called “reverse mentorship,” where younger employees mentor senior executives on topics like digital transformation, social media strategy, or emerging consumer trends. This reflects a recognition that expertise isn’t solely a function of seniority – younger generations often possess valuable specialized knowledge that older professionals lack.

Moreover, technology has democratized access to mentorship in unprecedented ways. Virtual mentoring platforms now connect people across geographical boundaries, and professionals can have multiple micro-mentors who provide targeted guidance on specific aspects of their development rather than a single lifelong mentor. The emphasis has shifted from long-term sponsorship to more project-based or skill-specific mentoring relationships.

What’s particularly interesting is how cultural attitudes toward authority and learning have evolved. Younger generations tend to value collaborative learning and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing over the traditional master-apprentice dynamic. They’re more likely to crowdsource advice from online communities or seek diverse perspectives rather than deferring exclusively to a single authority figure. This reflects broader societal shifts toward flatter organizational structures and more egalitarian workplace cultures.

Việc phát triển các kỹ năng cần thiết để thành công trong môi trường làm việc hiện đại cũng thay đổi theo cách chúng ta học hỏi từ nhau, đặc biệt là khi phải đối mặt với những thử thách đòi hỏi sự kiên nhẫn và thích nghi như describe a time when you had to be patient.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated: Sets context về transformation → Detailed description của traditional model → Contrast với modern approach với specific phenomena (reverse mentorship) → Technology’s role → Cultural shifts → Each point well-elaborated
• Vocabulary: Exceptionally advanced (undergone a fundamental transformation, hierarchical model, predominantly top-down, repositories of wisdom, climbing the corporate ladder, fluid and multidirectional, democratized access, micro-mentors, crowdsource advice, deferring exclusively, egalitarian)
• Grammar: Complex structures throughout: relative clauses, participle clauses, passive constructions, cleft sentences (What’s particularly interesting is), parallel structures
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis covering structural, technological, và cultural factors; specific terminology (reverse mentorship); acknowledges broader societal context

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Traditionally, In contrast, Moreover, What’s particularly interesting (structuring complex argument)
• Abstract nouns: transformation, disruption, trajectory, repositories, expertise, seniority, democratization, dynamic
• Academic vocabulary: predominantly, geographically bound, multidirectional, unprecedented, specialized knowledge, collaborative learning

---

Theme 3: Challenges in Modern Mentorship

Question 4: What challenges do you think people face when trying to find a good mentor today?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: What question về problems/challenges (identify and explain obstacles)
• Key words: challenges, find, good mentor, today
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple challenges → Explain each với context → Provide examples → Possible solutions hoặc implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think there are several challenges. First, it’s hard to find time because everyone is busy with work. Good mentors don’t have much free time to help others. Second, people don’t know how to approach potential mentors or what to say. They feel shy or worried about rejection. Also, in some workplaces, there aren’t formal programs, so people have to find mentors by themselves, which is difficult.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists several challenges với brief explanations
• Vocabulary: Everyday language (hard to find, busy with work, feel shy, by themselves)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Identifies relevant challenges nhưng analysis superficial, lacks specific examples hay deeper exploration of underlying causes

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Well, I think the challenges of finding quality mentorship today are quite multifaceted, and they vary depending on someone’s circumstances.

One significant hurdle is what I’d call “the accessibility paradox.” Paradoxically, while we have more potential access to experts than ever before through digital platforms, truly meaningful mentoring relationships – the kind that involve sustained engagement and personalized guidance – remain surprisingly elusive. High-quality mentors are often in high demand and already stretched thin, making it difficult to secure their time and attention. This creates a sort of “mentorship scarcity” for those who lack existing networks or connections.

Another challenge relates to the matching problem. Finding someone whose expertise, communication style, and values align with your needs isn’t straightforward. Many people make the mistake of seeking mentors based purely on title or prestige rather than genuine compatibility, which often leads to unproductive relationships. There’s also the issue of knowing what you need – early-career professionals often don’t have sufficient self-awareness to articulate what kind of guidance would be most beneficial, making it hard to identify appropriate mentors.

Furthermore, there’s what I’d describe as a cultural reluctance around explicitly asking for mentorship. Many people feel uncomfortable reaching out to potential mentors because they worry about imposing or fear rejection. This is particularly pronounced in cultures where direct requests for help might be seen as presumptuous or burdensome. There’s often an unspoken expectation that mentoring relationships should develop organically, but this leaves many people waiting passively for opportunities that may never materialize.

Lastly, in today’s rapidly evolving professional landscape, there’s sometimes a mismatch between the experience traditional mentors offer and the skills people actually need. Someone who built their career in a pre-digital era, for instance, might struggle to provide relevant guidance on navigating modern challenges like building an online presence or managing remote teams. This creates a need for what I mentioned earlier – multiple mentors with complementary expertise – but coordinating such arrangements adds another layer of complexity.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-organized: Multiple distinct challenges identified và explored in depth → Each challenge explained với underlying causes → Specific examples và implications → Logical progression between points
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (multifaceted, accessibility paradox, sustained engagement, surprisingly elusive, stretched thin, genuine compatibility, self-awareness, cultural reluctance, presumptuous, organically, mismatch, complementary expertise)
• Grammar: Full range expertly deployed: cleft sentences (what I’d call, what I’d describe as), relative clauses embedded naturally, conditionals, participle clauses, parallel structures (expertise, communication style, and values)
• Critical Thinking: Nuanced analysis showing understanding of paradoxes, cultural factors, psychological barriers, và systemic issues; uses specific terminology (accessibility paradox, matching problem, mentorship scarcity); acknowledges complexity và interrelationships

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, One significant hurdle, Another challenge, Furthermore, Lastly (clear organization)
• Tentative language: I think, I’d call, I’d describe as, often, might (showing thoughtful consideration)
• Hedging: quite, surprisingly, sometimes (avoiding overgeneralization)
• Academic expressions: the accessibility paradox, cultural reluctance, unspoken expectation, complementary expertise

Khi đối mặt với những thách thức phức tạp trong việc tìm kiếm và duy trì mối quan hệ mentorship, người học cần phát triển khả năng giải quyết vấn đề tương tự như describe a time when you had to overcome a challenge at school, đòi hỏi sự kiên trì và khả năng thích nghi.

---

Question 5: Should companies be responsible for providing mentorship to their employees?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Should question (opinion về responsibility/obligation)
• Key words: companies, responsible, providing mentorship, employees
• Cách tiếp cận: State position → Provide reasons supporting your view → Acknowledge counterargument → Examples or implications → Conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I believe companies should provide mentorship. It’s good for employees because they can develop skills and grow professionally. This also benefits companies because employees become more productive and stay longer at the company. Some people might say it’s expensive, but I think it’s worth the investment. Companies that don’t provide mentorship might lose talented employees to competitors.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position với basic reasons và brief counterargument
• Vocabulary: Simple expressions (good for, develop skills, worth the investment, talented employees)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Position clear và supported nhưng arguments lack depth, examples generic, doesn’t fully explore complexities

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

I’d strongly argue that companies do bear a significant responsibility for facilitating mentorship, though I wouldn’t say they should micromanage every aspect of these relationships.

From a business perspective, the case is quite compelling. Organizations that invest in structured mentorship programs consistently see tangible returns in terms of employee retention, accelerated skill development, and leadership pipeline strength. When companies actively foster mentorship cultures, they’re essentially safeguarding their institutional knowledge and ensuring continuity as senior employees transition out. Moreover, in today’s war for talent, offering robust mentorship opportunities has become a key differentiator in attracting and retaining top performers, particularly among younger workers who place a premium on professional development.

Beyond the economic calculus, there’s an ethical dimension to consider. Companies extract value from their employees’ labor and expertise, and with that comes a certain duty of care toward their holistic development. Leaving mentorship entirely to chance – where it becomes a privilege accessible only to those with the right connections – perpetuates inequality and undermines meritocracy within organizations. Formal programs help level the playing field, ensuring that all employees, regardless of their background or network, have access to guidance.

That said, I don’t think companies should be overly prescriptive about how mentoring relationships unfold. The most effective approach is probably to create the infrastructure – allocating time, providing training for mentors, establishing matching systems – while still allowing sufficient flexibility for relationships to develop authentically. Some companies go too far in trying to standardize mentorship, which can strip away the organic elements that make these relationships truly valuable.

It’s also worth noting that sole reliance on employer-provided mentorship has limitations. Professionals benefit from having mentors outside their organization who can offer unbiased perspectives and help them see opportunities beyond their current role. So while companies should definitely provide internal mentorship, individuals should also be encouraged to cultivate external mentoring relationships that complement what their employer offers.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated argument: Clear thesis → Business case với multiple specific benefits → Ethical argument về inequality → Counterbalance về not being overly prescriptive → Acknowledges limitations và broader context → Well-rounded conclusion
• Vocabulary: Exceptionally advanced (bear a significant responsibility, micromanage, compelling, tangible returns, safeguarding institutional knowledge, war for talent, robust, key differentiator, place a premium on, economic calculus, duty of care, perpetuates inequality, undermines meritocracy, overly prescriptive, authentically, sole reliance, unbiased perspectives, complement)
• Grammar: Full range of complex structures: conditionals, relative clauses, participle constructions, passive voice used strategically, parallel structures, cleft sentences
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis covering business rationale, ethical considerations, practical implementation, và limitations; acknowledges complexity và trade-offs; provides balanced view while maintaining clear position; uses specific examples (talent retention, leadership pipeline)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: From a business perspective, Beyond, Moreover, That said, It’s also worth noting that (sophisticated organization)
• Tentative language: I’d strongly argue, I don’t think, probably, Some companies (showing nuanced thinking)
• Academic vocabulary: compelling, tangible returns, institutional knowledge, ethical dimension, duty of care, meritocracy, infrastructure, authentically

Trong môi trường làm việc đòi hỏi cao, việc công ty hỗ trợ mentorship trở nên cần thiết hơn bao giờ hết, đặc biệt khi nhân viên phải đối mặt với các describe a time when you had to handle a high-stakes project đòi hỏi sự hướng dẫn và hỗ trợ từ những người có kinh nghiệm.

---

Theme 4: Cross-Cultural Mentorship

Question 6: How do cultural differences affect mentorship relationships?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: How question (explain mechanisms and effects)
• Key words: cultural differences, affect, mentorship relationships
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify specific cultural dimensions → Explain how each affects mentorship dynamics → Provide examples from different cultures → Discuss implications and possible solutions

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Cultural differences can affect mentorship in many ways. In some cultures, people respect older mentors more and follow their advice without question. In other cultures, people are more equal and can disagree with their mentors. Communication styles are also different – some cultures are direct while others are indirect. These differences can cause misunderstandings in mentorship relationships if people are not aware of them.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Identifies some cultural dimensions (respect for authority, communication styles)
• Vocabulary: Basic descriptions (respect more, without question, direct/indirect, cause misunderstandings)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Relevant points raised nhưng analysis shallow, lacks specific cultural examples, doesn’t fully explore complexities of cross-cultural dynamics

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

This is a fascinating area, and cultural dimensions profoundly shape how mentorship relationships unfold and function.

Perhaps the most salient factor is power distance – the extent to which less powerful members of society accept and expect unequal distribution of power. In high power distance cultures like many Asian societies, mentorship traditionally follows a more hierarchical model where the mentor is regarded as an authority figure whose guidance is rarely questioned. The relationship tends to be more formal, with clear boundaries between mentor and mentee. Mentees in these contexts might be more reticent to challenge their mentor’s advice or share dissenting opinions, which can sometimes inhibit the bidirectional learning that makes modern mentorship so valuable.

Conversely, in low power distance cultures such as Scandinavia or Australia, mentorship relationships tend to be more egalitarian and collaborative. Mentees feel more comfortable pushing back, asking probing questions, and even disagreeing with their mentors. While this can foster more dynamic exchanges, it might be perceived as disrespectful in cultures where deference to authority is deeply ingrained.

Communication styles represent another critical dimension. In high-context cultures like Japan or many Arab countries, communication is often indirect and implicit, with much left unsaid but understood through context and non-verbal cues. A mentor from such a background might hint at areas for improvement rather than stating them explicitly, which could be missed entirely by a mentee from a low-context culture like Germany or the United States, where explicit, direct feedback is the norm. This can lead to frustration on both sides – the mentor feeling their guidance isn’t being heeded, the mentee feeling they’re not receiving clear direction.

Cultural attitudes toward individualism versus collectivism also come into play. In individualistic cultures, mentorship often focuses on personal achievement, career advancement, and individual goal-setting. In collectivist cultures, there might be more emphasis on how one’s development serves the team or organization, with success framed more in terms of group harmony and collective outcomes.

What makes this particularly challenging in our globalized workplace is that many mentorship relationships now span cultural boundaries. A Vietnamese mentee working with an American mentor, for instance, needs to navigate these differences consciously. The key to success in cross-cultural mentorship lies in what’s called “cultural intelligence” – the ability to recognize these differences, adapt one’s approach, and establish shared expectations early in the relationship. Without this awareness, well-intentioned mentors might inadvertently provide guidance that’s culturally inappropriate or ineffective, and mentees might misinterpret feedback in ways that damage the relationship.

Mối quan hệ mentorship vượt qua ranh giới văn hóa trong môi trường làm việc toàn cầu

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally sophisticated: Introduction setting importance → Systematic exploration of specific cultural dimensions (power distance, communication styles, individualism/collectivism) → Each dimension explained với contrast between cultures → Practical implications for cross-cultural mentorship → Solutions (cultural intelligence) → Each point thoroughly developed với specific examples
• Vocabulary: Highly advanced and precise (salient factor, power distance, unequal distribution, hierarchical model, reticent, inhibit, bidirectional learning, egalitarian, deference to authority, high-context/low-context cultures, implicit, non-verbal cues, individualism versus collectivism, cultural intelligence, inadvertently, misinterpret)
• Grammar: Full sophisticated range: complex noun phrases, relative clauses embedded naturally, conditional structures, passive constructions, participle clauses, parallel structures, cleft sentences (What makes this particularly challenging)
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates deep understanding of cultural theory (specific terminology: power distance, high/low context, individualism/collectivism), provides specific cultural examples (Asian societies, Scandinavia, Japan, Germany), analyzes mechanisms of how culture affects behavior, acknowledges complexity and bidirectionality of challenges, proposes solutions (cultural intelligence)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Perhaps the most salient factor, Conversely, What makes this particularly challenging, The key to success (sophisticated structuring)
• Academic vocabulary: profoundly shape, power distance, hierarchical model, egalitarian, bidirectional learning, collectivist, inadvertently
• Hedging: tends to be, might be, often, could be (appropriate caution in generalizing about cultures)
• Contrastive language: Conversely, While this can…, In contrast to (showing comparative analysis)

Khả năng thích nghi trong các tình huống văn hóa khác nhau cũng được thể hiện qua việc describe a time when you participated in a virtual cultural exchange, cho thấy tầm quan trọng của sự hiểu biết xuyên văn hóa trong thế giới toàn cầu hóa.

Từ Vựng và Cụm Từ Quan Trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
mentor	n	/ˈmen.tɔːr/	người cố vấn, người hướng dẫn	My mentor helped me navigate the complexities of my career.	trusted mentor, experienced mentor, act as a mentor, seek a mentor
mentorship	n	/ˈmen.tɔːr.ʃɪp/	sự cố vấn, mối quan hệ hướng dẫn	Good mentorship can accelerate professional development.	provide mentorship, formal mentorship, mentorship program, quality mentorship
mentee	n	/men.ˈtiː/	người được hướng dẫn	As a mentee, I learned invaluable lessons from her experience.	aspiring mentee, receptive mentee, support a mentee
guidance	n	/ˈɡaɪ.dəns/	sự chỉ dẫn, hướng dẫn	Her guidance was instrumental in my career decisions.	provide guidance, seek guidance, valuable guidance, expert guidance
instill	v	/ɪnˈstɪl/	thấm nhuần, tạo dựng	She instilled confidence in me when I doubted myself.	instill confidence, instill values, instill discipline, instill passion
foster	v	/ˈfɒs.tər/	nuôi dưỡng, khuyến khích	Good mentors foster independent thinking in their mentees.	foster growth, foster relationships, foster creativity, foster learning
nurture	v	/ˈnɜː.tʃər/	vun đắp, chăm sóc phát triển	He nurtured my potential and helped me grow professionally.	nurture talent, nurture potential, nurture skills, nurture development
emulate	v	/ˈem.jʊ.leɪt/	noi theo, học hỏi	I aspire to emulate her work ethic and professionalism.	emulate success, strive to emulate, emulate qualities, emulate behavior
role model	n	/ˈrəʊl ˌmɒd.əl/	hình mẫu, tấm gương	She has been an inspiring role model throughout my career.	positive role model, serve as a role model, strong role model, influential role model
impart	v	/ɪmˈpɑːrt/	truyền đạt, chia sẻ	My mentor imparted wisdom that extended beyond technical skills.	impart knowledge, impart wisdom, impart skills, impart values
navigate	v	/ˈnæv.ɪ.ɡeɪt/	điều hướng, vượt qua	She helped me navigate the complexities of corporate politics.	navigate challenges, navigate complexities, navigate difficulties, successfully navigate
cultivate	v	/ˈkʌl.tɪ.veɪt/	trau dồi, phát triển	Good mentorship cultivates both skills and character.	cultivate relationships, cultivate skills, cultivate talent, cultivate mindset
transformative	adj	/trænsˈfɔː.mə.tɪv/	có tính biến đổi, chuyển hóa	The mentorship experience was truly transformative for me.	transformative experience, transformative impact, transformative influence, transformative effect
invaluable	adj	/ɪnˈvæl.ju.ə.bəl/	vô giá, cực kỳ quý giá	Her advice proved invaluable during challenging times.	invaluable experience, invaluable advice, invaluable support, invaluable resource
profound	adj	/prəˈfaʊnd/	sâu sắc, thấm thía	He had a profound influence on my professional trajectory.	profound impact, profound influence, profound effect, profound understanding
instrumental	adj	/ˌɪn.strəˈmen.təl/	đóng vai trò quan trọng, then chốt	She was instrumental in shaping my career path.	instrumental in, prove instrumental, be instrumental to, play an instrumental role
expertise	n	/ˌek.spɜːˈtiːz/	chuyên môn, kiến thức chuyên sâu	His expertise in the field was unmatched and inspiring.	technical expertise, develop expertise, share expertise, years of expertise
resilience	n	/rɪˈzɪl.i.əns/	khả năng phục hồi, sức bền	My mentor taught me resilience in the face of setbacks.	build resilience, develop resilience, demonstrate resilience, emotional resilience
advocate	v	/ˈæd.və.keɪt/	ủng hộ, đấu tranh cho	She advocated for my promotion when I lacked confidence.	advocate for, strongly advocate, advocate on behalf of, advocate change
succession planning	n	/səkˈseʃ.ən ˈplæn.ɪŋ/	kế hoạch kế nhiệm	Effective mentorship is crucial for succession planning.	implement succession planning, focus on succession planning, succession planning strategy

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
take someone under one’s wing	nhận ai đó làm người được bảo trợ, chăm sóc	She took me under her wing when I was struggling to adapt to the new role.	7.5-9
show someone the ropes	chỉ cho ai đó cách làm việc, hướng dẫn những điều cơ bản	My mentor showed me the ropes during my first few weeks on the job.	7-8
learning curve	đường cong học tập, quá trình học hỏi	He helped flatten my learning curve by sharing practical shortcuts.	7.5-8.5
at a crossroads	ở ngã rẽ, thời điểm quyết định quan trọng	When I was at a crossroads in my career, her guidance was invaluable.	8-9
pave the way for	mở đường cho, tạo điều kiện cho	Her mentorship paved the way for my advancement in the company.	7.5-8.5
think outside the box	suy nghĩ sáng tạo, không theo khuôn mẫu	She constantly challenged me to think outside the box and innovate.	7-8
go the extra mile	nỗ lực hơn mức cần thiết, làm nhiều hơn yêu cầu	As a mentor, she always went the extra mile to ensure I succeeded.	7-8
stand on the shoulders of giants	đứng trên vai những người khổng lồ (học hỏi từ người có thành tựu lớn)	I’m standing on the shoulders of giants thanks to my mentor’s wisdom.	8.5-9
baptism of fire	thử thách khắc nghiệt lần đầu	My first project was a baptism of fire, but my mentor helped me through it.	8-9
pay it forward	đền đáp bằng cách giúp đỡ người khác	Now I try to pay it forward by mentoring younger colleagues.	7.5-8.5
steep learning curve	đường cong học tập dốc (học nhiều trong thời gian ngắn)	The role had a steep learning curve, but mentorship accelerated my progress.	7.5-8.5
sink or swim	tự xoay sở hoặc thất bại	Rather than leaving me to sink or swim, she provided structured support.	8-8.5

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Sử dụng khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ ngắn, tự nhiên
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi muốn đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc correct misunderstanding
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi muốn nói thật, express genuine opinion
• 📝 I’d say that… – Cách sophisticated để đưa ra quan điểm
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Nhấn mạnh đây là personal viewpoint
• 📝 In my experience,… – Dẫn dắt vào personal example

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, sophisticated hơn “also”
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, emphasize additional point
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến, add extra information
• 📝 Moreover,… – Hơn thế nữa, formal addition
• 📝 Furthermore,… – Ngoài ra, academic style
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Vượt ra ngoài điều đó

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng cũng cần xem xét
• 📝 That said,… – Dù vậy, để present contrasting point
• 📝 Having said that,… – Nói như vậy nhưng, acknowledge previous point before contrasting
• 📝 Nevertheless,… – Tuy nhiên, despite what was just said

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, nhìn chung
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, what really matters
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng, kết quả là
• 📝 In the final analysis,… – Xét cho cùng, sophisticated conclusion

Để làm rõ và elaborate:

• 📝 What I mean is,… – Ý tôi là, để clarify
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác, rephrase for clarity
• 📝 To put it simply,… – Nói đơn giản, simplify complex idea
• 📝 To elaborate on that,… – Để nói rõ hơn về điều đó

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

• Mixed conditional: If I hadn’t had such excellent mentorship early in my career, I wouldn’t be in the position I am today. (Nếu tôi không có sự hướng dẫn xuất sắc sớm trong sự nghiệp, tôi đã không ở vị trí như ngày hôm nay)
• Inversion: Had it not been for my mentor’s guidance, I would have made many costly mistakes. (Nếu không có sự chỉ dẫn của người cố vấn, tôi đã mắc nhiều sai lầm tốn kém)
• Third conditional: If she had given up on me, I would never have developed the confidence I have now. (Nếu cô ấy bỏ cuộc với tôi, tôi đã không bao giờ phát triển được sự tự tin như hiện tại)

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

• Non-defining: My mentor, who has over 25 years of experience, taught me invaluable lessons about leadership. (Người cố vấn của tôi, người có hơn 25 năm kinh nghiệm, đã dạy tôi những bài học vô giá về lãnh đạo)
• Embedded: The advice that she gave me when I was struggling has stayed with me throughout my career. (Lời khuyên mà cô ấy đã cho tôi khi tôi đang gặp khó khăn đã đi cùng tôi suốt sự nghiệp)

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

• It is thought/believed/said that… It is widely believed that mentorship accelerates professional development significantly. (Người ta tin rằng sự cố vấn thúc đẩy phát triển nghề nghiệp đáng kể)
• Advanced passive: The skills I possess today were largely cultivated through the mentorship I received early on. (Các kỹ năng tôi có ngày hôm nay phần lớn được trau dồi thông qua sự hướng dẫn tôi nhận được từ sớm)

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

• What I find most…, is… What I find most valuable about mentorship is the psychological support it provides during challenging times. (Điều tôi thấy quý giá nhất về việc có người cố vấn là sự hỗ trợ tâm lý nó mang lại trong những thời điểm khó khăn)
• The thing that…, is… The thing that really sets great mentors apart is their ability to inspire confidence in others. (Điều thực sự làm nên sự khác biệt của những người cố vấn xuất sắc là khả năng truyền cảm hứng tự tin cho người khác)
• It was… that… It was her unwavering belief in my potential that gave me the courage to pursue ambitious goals. (Chính niềm tin không lay chuyển của cô ấy vào tiềm năng của tôi đã cho tôi dũng khí theo đuổi những mục tiêu đầy tham vọng)

5. Participle Clauses (Mệnh đề phân từ):

• Present participle: Having worked with several mentors throughout my career, I understand the transformative impact they can have. (Đã làm việc với nhiều người cố vấn trong sự nghiệp, tôi hiểu được tác động chuyển hóa mà họ có thể mang lại)
• Past participle: Encouraged by my mentor’s support, I took on challenges I would have otherwise avoided. (Được khuyến khích bởi sự hỗ trợ của người cố vấn, tôi đã đảm nhận những thử thách mà không thì tôi đã tránh)

6. Inversion for Emphasis:

• Never have I met someone so dedicated to helping others succeed. (Chưa bao giờ tôi gặp ai tận tâm đến vậy trong việc giúp người khác thành công)
• Rarely do you find mentors who invest so much time in their mentees’ development. (Hiếm khi bạn tìm thấy những người cố vấn đầu tư nhiều thời gian như vậy vào sự phát triển của người được hướng dẫn)
• Not only did she teach me technical skills, but she also helped me develop emotional intelligence. (Không chỉ dạy tôi kỹ năng kỹ thuật, cô ấy còn giúp tôi phát triển trí tuệ cảm xúc)

Kỹ năng sử dụng các cấu trúc ngữ pháp phức tạp này tương tự như kỹ năng linh hoạt và sáng tạo được thể hiện qua describe a person who is very resourceful at work, đều đòi hỏi sự luyện tập và thành thạo trong việc áp dụng.

Hy vọng bài viết này đã cung cấp cho bạn một cái nhìn toàn diện và chi tiết về cách trả lời chủ đề “Describe a person who has been a mentor to you” trong IELTS Speaking. Hãy nhớ rằng, thành công trong IELTS Speaking không chỉ đến từ việc học thuộc các câu trả lời mẫu, mà từ việc hiểu rõ tiêu chí chấm điểm, phát triển khả năng diễn đạt tự nhiên, và thực hành đều đặn với feedback chất lượng. Chúc bạn đạt được band điểm mong muốn trong kỳ thi IELTS sắp tới!