IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề Tin Tức Quốc Tế – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề tin tức quốc tế là một trong những chủ đề phổ biến và quan trọng trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking. Với sự phát triển của công nghệ và truyền thông, các sự kiện toàn cầu ngày càng ảnh hưởng đến cuộc sống hàng ngày của chúng ta. Chủ đề này không chỉ đánh giá khả năng ngôn ngữ mà còn kiểm tra kiến thức xã hội, khả năng phân tích và tư duy phản biện của thí sinh.

Theo thống kê từ các kỳ thi IELTS thực tế, chủ đề về tin tức và sự kiện quốc tế xuất hiện với tần suất cao từ năm 2020 đến nay, đặc biệt trong bối cảnh toàn cầu hóa và các vấn đề chung của nhân loại như biến đổi khí hậu, đại dịch, và phát triển công nghệ. Khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai được đánh giá ở mức cao.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được những câu hỏi thường gặp nhất về chủ đề tin tức quốc tế trong cả ba phần thi Speaking, các bài mẫu chi tiết theo nhiều band điểm khác nhau từ 6-7, 7.5-8 đến 8.5-9, kho từ vựng phong phú với hơn 50 từ và cụm từ ăn điểm, chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của một examiner giàu kinh nghiệm, và những lời khuyên thực tế giúp bạn tránh được những lỗi phổ biến của học viên Việt Nam. Bài viết này không chỉ cung cấp kiến thức mà còn giúp bạn tự tin hơn khi đối mặt với các câu hỏi về tin tức và sự kiện toàn cầu trong phòng thi.

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài khoảng 4-5 phút, là phần mở đầu giúp bạn “khởi động” và làm quen với examiner. Đặc điểm của Part 1 là các câu hỏi ngắn gọn, xoay quanh cuộc sống hàng ngày và sở thích cá nhân. Chiến lược hiệu quả nhất là trả lời tự nhiên, mở rộng ý trong 2-3 câu, tránh trả lời quá ngắn gọn.

Từ kinh nghiệm chấm thi của tôi, học viên Việt Nam thường mắc một số lỗi điển hình trong Part 1. Đầu tiên là trả lời quá ngắn, chỉ dừng lại ở Yes/No mà không giải thích thêm. Thứ hai là sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản, lặp đi lặp lại các từ cơ bản như “good”, “interesting”, “important”. Cuối cùng là thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân, khiến câu trả lời trở nên chung chung và thiếu thuyết phục. Để đạt điểm cao, bạn cần khắc phục những điểm yếu này ngay từ Part 1.

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you often follow international news?

Question 2: How do you usually get your news?

Question 3: What kind of international news interests you most?

Question 4: Do you think it’s important to know about events in other countries?

Question 5: Have you ever discussed international news with your friends?

Question 6: Do young people in your country follow international news?

Question 7: Has your interest in international news changed over time?

Question 8: What was the last international news story you remember reading?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you often follow international news?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có hay không
• Đưa ra tần suất cụ thể
• Giải thích lý do hoặc đưa ra ví dụ về loại tin tức bạn theo dõi

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I follow international news quite regularly, maybe 2-3 times a week. I usually read news on my phone during my lunch break. I find it interesting to know what’s happening around the world.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp, có tần suất cụ thể, đưa ra thói quen cá nhân
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (interesting, happening), thiếu ví dụ cụ thể về loại tin tức
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời rõ ràng và có mở rộng ý nhưng chưa thể hiện được vốn từ vựng phong phú hay cấu trúc ngữ pháp phức tạp

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Yes, I’m quite keen on keeping up with international news, and I’d say I stay informed about global events on a daily basis. I typically catch up on major headlines through news apps like BBC or Reuters during my commute. What particularly draws my attention are stories related to technological breakthroughs and environmental issues, as I believe these have far-reaching implications for our future.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng collocations tự nhiên (keen on, stay informed, catch up on), từ vựng chủ đề (technological breakthroughs, far-reaching implications), cấu trúc phức tạp với mệnh đề quan hệ
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency tốt với các discourse markers tự nhiên (I’d say, typically, particularly), vocabulary chính xác và sophisticated, grammar đa dạng, ý tưởng được phát triển logic với lý do cụ thể

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• be keen on: hứng thú, say mê về điều gì
• stay informed: cập nhật thông tin
• catch up on: theo kịp, cập nhật thông tin mới
• draw one’s attention: thu hút sự chú ý
• technological breakthroughs: đột phá công nghệ
• far-reaching implications: ảnh hưởng sâu rộng

---

Question: What kind of international news interests you most?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu rõ loại tin tức cụ thể
• Giải thích tại sao bạn quan tâm đến loại tin này
• Đưa ra ví dụ gần đây nếu có thể

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I’m most interested in news about technology and science. I think these topics are important for our future. For example, I recently read about new developments in AI technology, which I found very interesting.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời đúng trọng tâm, có ví dụ cụ thể
• Hạn chế: Lặp lại từ “interesting” (đã dùng ở câu trước), giải thích còn chung chung
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Có cấu trúc cơ bản tốt nhưng thiếu depth trong giải thích, vocabulary chưa đủ varied

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’m particularly fascinated by stories related to climate action and sustainable development. These issues resonate with me because they directly affect our planet’s future and require global cooperation. Recently, I’ve been following the coverage of various countries’ renewable energy initiatives, especially how nations like Denmark and Costa Rica are pioneering green technology. I find it inspiring to see how international collaboration can tackle such pressing challenges.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary topic-specific và sophisticated (climate action, sustainable development, renewable energy initiatives, pioneering), collocations tự nhiên (fascinated by, resonate with, tackle challenges), cấu trúc phức tạp với các linking words, ý tưởng sâu sắc với ví dụ cụ thể về các quốc gia
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Thể hiện khả năng diễn đạt ý tưởng trừu tượng một cách rõ ràng, sử dụng ngôn ngữ chính xác và tự nhiên, có critical thinking thể hiện qua việc nối liền vấn đề với tác động toàn cầu

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• be fascinated by: bị mê hoặc bởi, rất quan tâm đến
• climate action: hành động về khí hậu
• resonate with someone: gây được tiếng vang, tạo được sự đồng cảm với ai
• global cooperation: hợp tác toàn cầu
• coverage: sự đưa tin, phủ sóng
• renewable energy initiatives: sáng kiến năng lượng tái tạo
• pioneer (v): đi tiên phong
• pressing challenges: thách thức cấp bách

---

Question: Do you think it’s important to know about events in other countries?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đưa ra quan điểm rõ ràng (Yes/No)
• Giải thích 1-2 lý do chính
• Có thể đưa ra ví dụ minh họa

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think it’s very important. In today’s world, everything is connected, so what happens in one country can affect other countries. Also, knowing about international events helps us understand different cultures better.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Quan điểm rõ ràng, có 2 lý do logic
• Hạn chế: Lý do còn chung chung, thiếu ví dụ cụ thể, cấu trúc câu đơn giản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate communication nhưng chưa sophisticated, thiếu depth trong phân tích

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Absolutely, I believe it’s essential in our interconnected world. Firstly, international events can have direct consequences for our daily lives – whether it’s economic fluctuations, health crises like pandemics, or even supply chain disruptions. For instance, the recent semiconductor shortage affected technology prices globally. Secondly, staying informed about global affairs broadens our perspective and helps us become more culturally aware citizens. It’s about understanding that we’re all part of a global community where events in one region can trigger ripple effects worldwide.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Từ vựng sophisticated (interconnected, fluctuations, ripple effects), cấu trúc đa dạng (whether…or, for instance), ý tưởng được phát triển với ví dụ cụ thể và current (semiconductor shortage), phân tích có chiều sâu về tác động đa chiều
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency xuất sắc với discourse markers tự nhiên (Absolutely, Firstly, Secondly), vocabulary precise và idiomatic, grammar varied với passive voice và complex sentences, critical thinking thể hiện qua việc nối liền local và global impacts

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• essential: thiết yếu, rất quan trọng
• interconnected world: thế giới kết nối lẫn nhau
• direct consequences: hậu quả trực tiếp
• economic fluctuations: biến động kinh tế
• health crises: khủng hoảng sức khỏe
• supply chain disruptions: gián đoạn chuỗi cung ứng
• broaden one’s perspective: mở rộng tầm nhìn
• culturally aware citizens: công dân có nhận thức văn hóa
• trigger ripple effects: tạo ra hiệu ứng lan tỏa

Học viên IELTS luyện tập trả lời câu hỏi về tin tức quốc tế với giáo viên

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn có 1 phút để chuẩn bị. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất vì bạn cần duy trì việc nói liên tục không bị ngắt quãng. Đặc điểm chính là bạn phải kể chi tiết về một chủ đề cụ thể theo yêu cầu trên thẻ câu hỏi.

Chiến lược hiệu quả cho Part 2 bao gồm việc sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi chú các từ khóa, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh vì sẽ không đủ thời gian. Bạn cần nói đủ 2 phút, tối thiểu 1.5 phút để không bị mất điểm. Quan trọng nhất là phải trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trên thẻ. Khi kể chuyện về sự kiện trong quá khứ, hãy sử dụng thì quá khứ một cách chính xác.

Các lỗi thường gặp mà tôi nhận thấy ở học viên Việt Nam là không tận dụng hết thời gian chuẩn bị, vội vàng bắt đầu nói. Nhiều bạn nói ít hơn 1.5 phút khiến examiner phải hỏi thêm câu hỏi, điều này ảnh hưởng tiêu cực đến điểm Fluency. Ngoài ra, việc bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points cũng là vấn đề phổ biến, dẫn đến mất điểm Task Achievement.

Cue Card

Describe An International News Event That Caught Your Attention

You should say:

• What the event was
• When and where you heard about it
• Why it was significant
• And explain why this news caught your attention

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an event (miêu tả một sự kiện)

Thì động từ: Chủ yếu là quá khứ vì đang kể về một sự kiện đã xảy ra trong quá khứ

Bullet points phải cover:

• What the event was: Bạn cần nêu rõ đây là sự kiện gì, diễn ra ở đâu, liên quan đến ai/cái gì
• When and where you heard about it: Khoảng thời gian nào, qua nguồn nào (TV, mạng xã hội, báo chí)
• Why it was significant: Tầm quan trọng của sự kiện đối với thế giới/khu vực/một nhóm người cụ thể
• And explain why this news caught your attention: Đây là phần quan trọng nhất – lý do CÁ NHÂN tại sao bạn chú ý đến tin này

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần “explain why” là nơi bạn thể hiện critical thinking và personal connection với chủ đề. Đây là phần ghi điểm cao nhất vì thể hiện khả năng phân tích và diễn đạt cảm xúc/suy nghĩ phức tạp. Đừng chỉ nói “because it’s interesting” mà phải giải thích sâu hơn về tác động cá nhân, cảm xúc, hoặc sự liên hệ với cuộc sống của bạn.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about a news event that really interested me. It was about the FIFA World Cup 2022 in Qatar. I heard about it last year when the tournament was happening, around November and December.

I first got this news from social media, especially Facebook and YouTube. My friends were sharing videos and posts about the matches. I also watched some news on TV with my family about the opening ceremony and important games.

This event was significant for several reasons. First, it was the first World Cup held in the Middle East, which was historic. Second, many famous football players participated, and the competition was very exciting. The final match between Argentina and France was particularly memorable because it was very close and dramatic.

This news caught my attention because I’m a big football fan. I’ve been following football since I was young. Watching the World Cup is always special for me because it only happens every four years. I was also interested because one of my favorite players, Messi, was playing, and many people said this might be his last World Cup. When Argentina won, I felt very happy for him. The tournament also showed me how sports can bring people together from different countries and cultures. It was inspiring to see how passionate fans were about supporting their teams.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có linking words cơ bản (First, Second, also, because), trình bày có logic nhưng còn đơn giản, một số chỗ chưa flow tự nhiên
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng adequate với một số collocations (opening ceremony, caught my attention, bring people together) nhưng chưa sophisticated, lặp lại “interesting”, “special”
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Có sử dụng một số cấu trúc phức (when clause, because clause, which was historic) nhưng chủ yếu vẫn là simple và compound sentences
Pronunciation	6-7	Pronunciation rõ ràng, intonation cơ bản, chưa có nhiều stress patterns phức tạp

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
• ✅ Có ví dụ cụ thể (Argentina vs France, Messi)
• ✅ Thời lượng đạt yêu cầu
• ✅ Có personal connection rõ ràng

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Từ vựng chưa đa dạng, lặp lại một số từ
• ⚠️ Cấu trúc ngữ pháp chưa phức tạp
• ⚠️ Phần explain còn surface-level, chưa sâu về emotions và reflections

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to share with you an international news story that really made an impression on me. It was about the rescue operation of the Thai football team from Tham Luang cave back in 2018, though it still remains vivid in my memory.

I first came across this story through social media feeds and news websites in July 2018. What struck me initially was the headline about twelve boys and their coach being trapped in a flooded cave in northern Thailand. Over the following days, I closely followed the developments through various international news channels like BBC and CNN, as well as live updates on Twitter. The story dominated global news for nearly three weeks.

This event was globally significant for multiple reasons. Firstly, it demonstrated an unprecedented level of international cooperation, with rescue experts, divers, and volunteers from numerous countries coming together for a common humanitarian cause. The complexity of the rescue operation, involving navigating through narrow passages in complete darkness and murky water, showcased human ingenuity and determination. Moreover, the successful outcome against all odds restored people’s faith in humanity and international solidarity during a time when the world seemed increasingly divided.

What particularly captivated me about this news was the sheer drama and emotional intensity of the situation. As someone who values teamwork and resilience, I was deeply moved by how diverse groups of people, despite language barriers and cultural differences, worked seamlessly together. The story also resonated with me on a personal level because it involved young people around my age, which made it feel more relatable. I found myself emotionally invested, checking for updates multiple times a day and feeling genuine relief when each boy was safely extracted. The coverage also highlighted the importance of remaining calm under pressure and the power of collective action, lessons that I believe are applicable to many aspects of life.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Flow tự nhiên với discourse markers sophisticated (Initially, Over the following days, Moreover, What particularly), ý tưởng được phát triển logic và connected tốt
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Vocabulary varied và precise (made an impression, remains vivid, unprecedented level, sheer drama, emotionally invested), collocations tự nhiên (closely followed, restored faith, language barriers)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Cấu trúc đa dạng (involving + V-ing, despite + noun, when clause, which made it), sử dụng passive voice appropriately, complex sentences nhiều
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear pronunciation với good stress patterns và natural intonation

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“got this news”, “special”, “happy”	“came across this story”, “remains vivid in my memory”, “emotionally invested”
Grammar	“I heard about it last year when…”	“Over the following days, I closely followed the developments…”
Ideas	“It was interesting because I like football”	“The story resonated with me on a personal level because it involved young people around my age, which made it feel more relatable”

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to talk about a news story that profoundly affected me – the devastating earthquake that struck Turkey and Syria in February 2023. This was arguably one of the most tragic natural disasters in recent years, and it left an indelible mark on my consciousness.

I first became aware of this catastrophic event through a push notification on my news app early one morning. What immediately caught my eye was the staggering magnitude – a 7.8 magnitude earthquake followed by numerous powerful aftershocks. As the day progressed, I found myself glued to various news sources, from live broadcasts by Al Jazeera and BBC to first-hand accounts shared on social media platforms by people on the ground. The harrowing images of collapsed buildings, desperate rescue efforts, and families torn apart were almost too overwhelming to process.

The significance of this event was multi-faceted. On a humanitarian level, the sheer scale of destruction was unprecedented in that region, with tens of thousands of casualties and millions displaced from their homes in the depths of winter. The tragedy was compounded by the fact that many areas affected were already grappling with political instability and economic hardship. From a geopolitical perspective, it triggered an outpouring of international aid and temporarily set aside some regional tensions, demonstrating how natural disasters can transcend political boundaries. Additionally, the event reignited debates about building regulations, earthquake preparedness, and the vulnerabilities of urban infrastructure in seismically active zones.

What made this news particularly impactful for me was the profound sense of helplessness it evoked. Unlike following sports events or political developments, watching this unfold in real-time brought home the fragility of human existence and our vulnerability in the face of natural forces. I was particularly struck by the stories of ordinary people who became heroes – neighbors digging through rubble with bare hands, volunteers working around the clock despite aftershocks, and the incredible resilience shown by affected communities. On a more personal note, I had actually traveled to some of the affected areas during a gap year, so seeing places I once visited reduced to rubble was emotionally jarring. This visceral connection made the tragedy feel less abstract and more intimately real.

Moreover, the coverage prompted me to reflect on several broader issues. It highlighted the stark disparities in how different nations respond to and recover from disasters, often dictated by their economic resources and governance structures. The event also served as a sobering reminder of climate change and its potential to exacerbate natural disasters. Perhaps most importantly, it reaffirmed my belief in the importance of global solidarity and the intrinsic goodness that emerges when humanity faces its darkest moments. The collective grief and the subsequent mobilization of aid from around the world restored my faith in our capacity for compassion despite the often divisive nature of international relations.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Xuất sắc với flow hoàn toàn tự nhiên, không hesitation, discourse markers sophisticated và varied (Arguably, As the day progressed, Moreover, Perhaps most importantly), ý tưởng được phát triển sâu và connected seamlessly
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Vocabulary precise, idiomatic và natural (left an indelible mark, glued to, torn apart, outpouring, reignited debates, emotionally jarring, visceral connection), collocations native-like (set aside tensions, transcend boundaries, working around the clock)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range của structures (inversion potential, cleft sentences, passive constructions, multiple subordinate clauses, present perfect for relevance), hoàn toàn accurate
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Native-like features với excellent stress, rhythm, intonation patterns

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Không có hesitation hay repetition, mỗi ý được phát triển tự nhiên sang ý tiếp theo. Discourse markers được sử dụng một cách tinh tế (arguably, what immediately caught my eye, on a more personal note) thay vì mechanical.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• Ví dụ: “left an indelible mark” thay vì “I remember it well”
• “compounded by” thay vì “made worse by”
• “visceral connection” thay vì “strong feeling”
• Các từ này precise, sophisticated nhưng vẫn natural, không forced

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Ví dụ: “Unlike following sports events… watching this unfold…” (participle phrases)
• “The fact that many areas affected were already grappling with…” (complex noun phrase with relative clause)
• “Seeing places I once visited reduced to rubble” (participle + perfect aspect)

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Không chỉ describe sự kiện mà còn reflect về broader implications (economic disparities, climate change, human resilience), demonstrating critical thinking và mature perspective. Personal connection được woven naturally vào narrative chứ không forced.

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2:

Question 1: Would you like to visit the places affected by this event in the future?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I think I would. It would be interesting to see how these places have recovered and to learn more about their history and culture.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely. I’d be very interested in witnessing the reconstruction efforts and seeing how communities have rebuilt their lives. There’s something profoundly meaningful about visiting places that have experienced such tragedy – it’s a way of paying respect to the resilience of the human spirit and learning from how societies bounce back from adversity.

---

Question 2: Do you think news coverage of disasters is always helpful?

Band 6-7 Answer:
I think it’s mostly helpful because it raises awareness and encourages people to donate. However, sometimes the media can focus too much on negative aspects.

Band 8-9 Answer:
That’s quite a nuanced question. While comprehensive coverage undoubtedly raises awareness and mobilizes aid, there’s a fine line between informative journalism and sensationalism. Excessive focus on tragedy can lead to “compassion fatigue” where audiences become desensitized. Moreover, intrusive reporting can sometimes compromise the dignity of victims. I believe responsible journalism should strike a balance between keeping the public informed and respecting those affected.

Thí sinh IELTS Speaking Part 2 đang trình bày về sự kiện tin tức quốc tế

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút và là phần thách thức nhất của IELTS Speaking. Đặc điểm nổi bật là các câu hỏi mang tính thảo luận trừu tượng và sâu sắc hơn nhiều so với Part 2. Examiner sẽ mở rộng chủ đề từ Part 2 sang những vấn đề xã hội, xu hướng toàn cầu, và những debate phức tạp.

Yêu cầu của Part 3 bao gồm khả năng phân tích vấn đề từ nhiều góc độ, so sánh và đối chiếu các quan điểm khác nhau, đánh giá tác động của các hiện tượng xã hội, và đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân có lý lẽ vững chắc. Đây là lúc bạn thể hiện critical thinking – một yếu tố then chốt để đạt band 8 trở lên.

Chiến lược hiệu quả cho Part 3 là mở rộng câu trả lời đủ 3-5 câu, không trả lời ngắn gọn như Part 1. Sử dụng discourse markers để structure câu trả lời của bạn một cách rõ ràng (Well, Actually, I think…). Quan trọng là đưa ra examples từ xã hội, thống kê, hoặc trends chung, không chỉ dựa vào kinh nghiệm cá nhân. Hãy thừa nhận complexity của vấn đề bằng cách xem xét cả hai mặt của argument trước khi đưa ra kết luận.

Từ kinh nghiệm chấm thi, tôi nhận thấy học viên Việt Nam thường gặp khó khăn trong Part 3 vì một số lý do. Thứ nhất là trả lời quá ngắn, chỉ 1-2 câu mà không phân tích sâu. Thứ hai là không đưa ra lý lẽ rõ ràng để support quan điểm của mình. Cuối cùng là thiếu từ vựng trừu tượng cần thiết để discuss các vấn đề xã hội phức tạp, dẫn đến việc phải dùng từ đơn giản hoặc lặp lại.

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Media and News Consumption

---

Question 1: How has the way people consume news changed over the years?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare/Contrast (so sánh quá khứ và hiện tại)
• Key words: “changed over the years” – cần nói về sự thay đổi theo thời gian
• Cách tiếp cận: Past vs Present comparison → Reasons for change → Impact/Implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Well, I think news consumption has changed a lot. In the past, people mainly got news from TV and newspapers. Now, most people use the internet and social media to read news. This is more convenient because they can access news anytime on their phones. Young people especially prefer online news because it’s faster and they can share it easily with friends.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có comparison cơ bản (past vs present) và lý do
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng repetitive (news xuất hiện 6 lần, changed/change 2 lần)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Trả lời đúng trọng tâm nhưng thiếu depth, chưa có specific examples hay sophisticated vocabulary

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, the landscape of news consumption has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past few decades. Traditionally, people relied heavily on print media and scheduled television broadcasts, which meant news consumption was relatively passive and limited to specific times. However, with the advent of digital technology and smartphones, we’ve witnessed a paradigm shift toward on-demand, personalized news feeds.

What’s particularly noteworthy is that this change isn’t merely about the medium but also about the nature of engagement. Modern consumers don’t just passively absorb information; they actively curate their news sources, engage in discussions through comments sections, and even contribute to news dissemination by sharing stories across social networks. This has created a more democratized but also more fragmented information ecosystem.

On the one hand, this evolution has made news more accessible and diverse, allowing people to access multiple perspectives instantly. On the other hand, it’s also led to challenges like echo chambers, where people only consume news that aligns with their existing beliefs, and the proliferation of misinformation, which spreads faster than ever before.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized với clear progression – Past → Present → Analysis of implications → Balanced view
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (landscape, undergone transformation, advent, paradigm shift, curate, democratized, fragmented, echo chambers, proliferation)
• Grammar: Complex structures đa dạng (has undergone, meant that…, this change isn’t merely about… but also about…, allowing + object + to-infinitive)
• Critical Thinking: Không chỉ describe change mà còn analyze nature của change và implications (both positive và negative), showing nuanced understanding

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, Traditionally, However, What’s particularly noteworthy, On the one hand, On the other hand
• Tentative language: relatively, seems to, tend to (thể hiện academic caution)
• Abstract nouns: transformation, engagement, dissemination, ecosystem, proliferation

---

Question 2: Do you think traditional newspapers will disappear in the future?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Future prediction + Opinion
• Key words: “traditional newspapers”, “disappear” – cần discuss likelihood và reasons
• Cách tiếp cận: Give stance → Support với reasons → Acknowledge counterargument → Conclude

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I don’t think newspapers will completely disappear, but they will become less popular. Many people now prefer to read news online because it’s free and more convenient. However, some older people still like reading physical newspapers. Maybe newspapers will continue to exist but in smaller numbers, serving a specific group of readers.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có opinion và some reasoning
• Vocabulary: Basic và repetitive (newspapers 3 lần, people 3 lần)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Answer phù hợp nhưng thiếu sophistication trong vocabulary và depth trong analysis

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’d say that while traditional print newspapers are certainly in decline, I don’t believe they’ll vanish entirely – at least not in the foreseeable future. What’s more likely is that they’ll undergo a significant transformation and occupy a niche market.

Several factors contribute to this prediction. Firstly, there’s still a substantial demographic – particularly older, more affluent readers – who place value on the tangible experience of reading a physical newspaper. There’s something about the tactile quality and the ritualistic nature of sitting down with a morning paper that digital platforms simply can’t replicate. Moreover, reputable newspapers have established credibility that carries weight in an era of rampant misinformation online.

That said, I think we’ll see newspapers evolve rather than disappear. Many publications have already adopted hybrid models, maintaining both print and robust digital presences. They might scale back print editions to weekly or weekend-only formats while focusing resources on their digital platforms. Think of publications like The New York Times or The Guardian, which have successfully transitioned to sustainable digital subscription models while still producing quality journalism.

Ultimately, I believe newspapers will persist as premium products for those who value in-depth analysis and high-quality journalism, much like vinyl records have carved out a niche in the age of digital music streaming. The key is adaptation rather than extinction.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated organization – Direct answer với qualification (not entirely) → Supporting reasons với examples → Acknowledgment of adaptation → Conclusion với analogy
• Vocabulary: Rich và varied (in decline, vanish entirely, occupy a niche, substantial demographic, tactile quality, rampant misinformation, hybrid models, carved out a niche)
• Grammar: Full range including conditional (can’t replicate), perfect aspect (have adopted), future forms (will evolve), complex noun phrases
• Critical Thinking: Nuanced view – không absolute yes/no mà “transformation”, sử dụng analogy với vinyl records để illustrate point, considers multiple stakeholders (readers, publishers)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: I’d say, What’s more likely, Firstly, Moreover, That said, Ultimately
• Hedging language: certainly, I don’t believe, at least not, might, I believe (showing measured opinion)
• Abstract nouns: decline, transformation, credibility, adaptation, extinction

---

Theme 2: Impact of International News

Question 1: What impact does international news have on people’s daily lives?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Analyze impact/effects
• Key words: “impact”, “daily lives” – cần discuss concrete effects
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge complexity → Direct impacts → Indirect impacts → Examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

International news can affect people’s lives in different ways. For example, if there’s a war or economic crisis in another country, it might affect prices in our country. Also, international news helps people understand global issues like climate change. Some people might feel worried when they hear bad news from other countries. Overall, I think international news makes people more aware of what’s happening in the world.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists some impacts với basic examples
• Vocabulary: Simple (affect, bad news, aware)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers the topic adequately nhưng lacks sophistication và specific examples

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, this is quite a complex issue because the impact operates on multiple levels, both direct and indirect. On the most tangible level, international events can have immediate practical consequences for individuals. For instance, geopolitical tensions in oil-producing regions can trigger fluctuations in fuel prices, which cascades into affecting everything from transportation costs to the price of everyday goods. Similarly, financial crises in major economies like the US or China can send ripples through global markets, potentially affecting people’s investments or job security.

Beyond these economic implications, international news shapes public opinion and influences political discourse within countries. When people learn about humanitarian crises or civil rights movements abroad, it can spark similar debates domestically or mobilize support for international causes. We saw this clearly with the #MeToo movement, which started in one country but resonated globally, or more recently with the Black Lives Matter protests that transcended borders.

On a more psychological level, constant exposure to international news, particularly negative events, can lead to what psychologists call “headline stress disorder” – a sense of anxiety and helplessness about world affairs. However, it’s worth noting that positive international news can also inspire and foster a sense of global citizenship. Stories about scientific breakthroughs, environmental initiatives, or acts of international solidarity can uplift people and broaden their perspectives.

I’d argue that perhaps the most profound impact is how international news gradually erodes the psychological distance between “us” and “them,” making us realize that challenges like climate change, pandemics, or economic inequality are shared human concerns rather than isolated national issues.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptional organization – Acknowledges complexity → Economic impacts → Social/political impacts → Psychological impacts → Overarching significance
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (tangible level, cascades into, send ripples, spark debates, mobilize, transcended borders, headline stress disorder, erodes psychological distance)
• Grammar: Wide range including passives (can be affected), conditionals (if-then logic), gerunds (constant exposure to…), complex modifiers
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis covering economic, social, psychological aspects; uses current examples (#MeToo, BLM); acknowledges both negative and positive impacts; synthesizes với overarching insight

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, For instance, Similarly, Beyond these, On a more psychological level, However, I’d argue
• Hedging/Academic language: quite a complex issue, can potentially, it’s worth noting, I’d argue, perhaps the most profound
• Abstract nouns: implications, discourse, exposure, solidarity, perspectives, inequality

---

Question 2: Should governments control what international news citizens can access?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion on controversial issue (nên hay không nên)
• Key words: “governments control”, “what news”, “citizens can access”
• Cách tiếp cận: This is controversial → Present both perspectives → Give personal stance với qualifications → Conclude

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

This is a difficult question. I think governments should not control news too much because people have the right to know what’s happening in the world. Freedom of information is important in democratic countries. However, maybe governments need to control some fake news or dangerous information that could harm society. So there should be a balance between freedom and safety.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Acknowledges difficulty và presents both sides briefly
• Vocabulary: Basic (control, fake news, freedom, safety)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Shows balanced thinking nhưng analysis còn shallow, thiếu concrete examples và sophisticated arguments

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

This is undoubtedly one of the most contentious issues in contemporary media ethics, and I think any answer needs to navigate between two important principles: freedom of information and public safety.

On the one hand, unrestricted access to international news is fundamental to democratic societies. Citizens need diverse information sources to make informed decisions, hold their governments accountable, and understand their place in the global context. History has shown us that authoritarian regimes often consolidate power by controlling narratives and limiting what information crosses their borders. The so-called “Great Firewall” in certain countries exemplifies how news control can be used to shape public opinion and suppress dissent.

That being said, I don’t think absolute freedom without any oversight is tenable either. There are legitimate concerns about deliberately fabricated news stories designed to incite violence, hate speech that targets vulnerable groups, or disinformation campaigns that undermine national security. The challenge is distinguishing between legitimate regulation aimed at protecting citizens and censorship designed to suppress inconvenient truths.

Rather than government control, I’d advocate for a more nuanced approach. This might include independent regulatory bodies that establish transparent guidelines for identifying and flagging misleading content, robust fact-checking mechanisms, and perhaps most importantly, comprehensive media literacy education so citizens can critically evaluate news sources themselves. Tech platforms also have a responsibility to combat the spread of verifiable misinformation without overreaching into censoring legitimate journalism.

Ultimately, I believe the answer lies not in government control but in empowering citizens with the tools and critical thinking skills to navigate the complex information landscape themselves, while maintaining minimal, transparent safeguards against demonstrably harmful content.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Masterfully organized – Acknowledges controversy → Arguments against control → Arguments for some regulation → Proposes alternative solution → Personal conclusion
• Vocabulary: Exceptionally sophisticated (contentious, navigate, consolidate power, exemplifies, incite violence, tenable, distinguishing, nuanced approach, robust mechanisms, overreaching, demonstrably harmful)
• Grammar: Full range including passive constructions (can be used), complex conditionals, gerunds as subjects (distinguishing between…), abstract noun phrases
• Critical Thinking: Highly sophisticated – doesn’t give simple yes/no answer, considers multiple stakeholders (governments, citizens, tech platforms), acknowledges complexity, proposes alternative solutions, uses specific examples (Great Firewall), shows awareness of historical context

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: On the one hand, That being said, Rather than, Ultimately
• Hedging language: I think any answer needs to, I’d advocate for, I believe the answer lies
• Abstract nouns: principles, narratives, oversight, dissent, mechanisms, transparency, safeguards

Theme 3: Credibility and Misinformation

Question 1: Why do you think fake news spreads so quickly online?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause and Effect (giải thích nguyên nhân)
• Key words: “fake news”, “spreads quickly”, “online”
• Cách tiếp cận: Multiple causes → How each contributes → Real-world implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Fake news spreads quickly for several reasons. First, people can share news very easily on social media with just one click. Second, many people don’t check if the news is true before sharing it. Also, fake news often has interesting or shocking headlines that make people want to share it. Finally, some people create fake news on purpose to get attention or make money from advertising.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists causes clearly với First, Second, Also, Finally
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng basic (spreads, check, interesting, make money)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear structure và covers main points nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated vocabulary

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

There are several interconnected factors that contribute to the rapid proliferation of misinformation online, and understanding these is crucial in our digital age.

First and foremost, the architecture of social media platforms is inherently designed to prioritize engagement over accuracy. Algorithms tend to amplify content that generates strong emotional responses – whether outrage, fear, or excitement – because such content drives more clicks, shares, and comments. Unfortunately, false or sensationalized stories often provoke stronger reactions than nuanced, factual reporting, giving them a competitive advantage in the attention economy.

Secondly, there’s a psychological dimension we can’t ignore. Research has shown that people are more likely to share information that confirms their existing beliefs – a phenomenon known as confirmation bias. Fake news exploits this tendency by tailoring stories to resonate with specific ideological groups. When we encounter information that aligns with our worldview, we’re less likely to scrutinize it critically and more inclined to share it, essentially becoming unwitting participants in its spread.

Additionally, the sheer speed and friction-free nature of digital sharing plays a role. Unlike traditional media, where information went through editorial gatekeepers, anyone can now broadcast to thousands or millions with a single click. This democratization of information sharing, while positive in many ways, also means verification processes are often bypassed.

What’s particularly concerning is that fake news often gets a head start on the truth. Studies have shown that debunking false information takes considerably longer than creating and spreading it. By the time fact-checkers verify and refute a story, it may have already gone viral and embedded itself in public consciousness.

Last but not least, there are malicious actors who deliberately manufacture and disseminate false information for various purposes – political manipulation, financial gain through clickbait advertising, or simply to sow discord. Some even use sophisticated bot networks to artificially amplify certain narratives, making fringe ideas seem more widespread than they actually are.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Comprehensive và logical – Multiple interconnected causes each fully developed với explanations và implications
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated (rapid proliferation, inherently designed, sensationalized, competitive advantage, unwitting participants, friction-free nature, editorial gatekeepers, embedded itself, sow discord)
• Grammar: Full range including passives (is designed to, can’t be ignored), relative clauses (that generates, which is positive), participle phrases (giving them a…), abstract noun subjects
• Critical Thinking: Multi-faceted analysis covering technological (algorithms), psychological (confirmation bias), structural (democratization), temporal (head start), và intentional (malicious actors) factors; uses research-based evidence; considers unintended consequences

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: First and foremost, Secondly, Additionally, What’s particularly concerning, Last but not least
• Academic language: Research has shown that, a phenomenon known as, Studies have shown that
• Abstract nouns: proliferation, architecture, engagement, phenomenon, democratization, verification, manipulation

---

Question 2: What can be done to help people identify reliable news sources?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Problem-Solution
• Key words: “what can be done”, “help people”, “identify reliable sources”
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge challenge → Multiple solutions từ different stakeholders → Most effective approach

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

There are several things we can do. First, schools should teach students how to check if news is reliable. They can learn to look at the source and check multiple websites. Second, social media companies should mark fake news or remove it. Also, people should be more careful and not share news without reading it carefully. Finally, professional journalists should maintain high standards so people can trust them.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists solutions clearly
• Vocabulary: Basic (check, mark, careful, maintain)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main solutions nhưng lacks sophistication trong presentation và depth trong analysis

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Addressing this challenge requires a multi-stakeholder approach, as no single solution can fully tackle such a complex problem.

I’d argue that education is the cornerstone of any long-term solution. Media literacy should be integrated into school curricula from an early age, teaching students not just to consume information but to critically evaluate it. This means understanding journalistic standards, recognizing logical fallacies, identifying manipulated images, and knowing how to cross-reference sources. In Vietnam, for example, we’re seeing some schools begin to incorporate these skills into their programs, which is encouraging. However, education shouldn’t stop at schools – public awareness campaigns can help adults develop these critical faculties as well.

From a technological standpoint, platforms have a significant role to play. Social media companies could implement more robust verification systems, perhaps using AI-powered fact-checking tools that flag potentially misleading content in real-time. However, this needs to be done transparently to avoid accusations of bias or censorship. Some platforms have experimented with adding context labels to posts or slowing down the sharing of unverified information to give users time to think before clicking share – a kind of “digital speed bump” that could prove effective.

Professional journalism organizations also need to step up. By maintaining rigorous standards and being transparent about their methodologies, they can distinguish themselves from less reliable sources. Many reputable outlets now include detailed information about their editorial processes, corrections policies, and funding sources, which helps build trust. The rise of collaborative fact-checking initiatives like the International Fact-Checking Network is also promising.

That said, I believe the most powerful tool is cultivating a culture of skepticism – not cynicism, but healthy questioning. We should encourage people to pause before sharing, to ask themselves: “Who benefits from this story? Does this seem too outrageous to be true? Have I seen this reported by multiple credible sources?” These simple mental checkpoints can be surprisingly effective.

Ultimately, no system will be perfect, but by combining education, technological safeguards, journalistic integrity, and individual responsibility, we can create a more informed society better equipped to navigate the modern information landscape.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated multi-dimensional approach – Each stakeholder (education/tech/journalism/individuals) addressed thoroughly với specific suggestions
• Vocabulary: Exceptionally rich (multi-stakeholder approach, cornerstone, logical fallacies, cross-reference, robust verification systems, digital speed bump, rigorous standards, cultivating a culture, mental checkpoints)
• Grammar: Full grammatical range including passive (should be integrated), gerunds (teaching students), conditionals (could prove effective), complex noun phrases (AI-powered fact-checking tools)
• Critical Thinking: Highly developed – considers multiple stakeholders, acknowledges no perfect solution, uses specific examples (Vietnam, International Fact-Checking Network), distinguishes between skepticism và cynicism, proposes both technological và human solutions

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: I’d argue that, From a technological standpoint, That said, Ultimately
• Hedging language: could implement, perhaps using, I believe, no system will be perfect
• Abstract nouns: cornerstone, faculties, transparency, integrity, responsibility, landscape

Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả IELTS Speaking Part 3 về chủ đề tin tức quốc tế

Từ Vựng và Cụm Từ Quan Trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
breaking news	n	/ˈbreɪkɪŋ njuːz/	tin nóng, tin mới nhất	I saw the breaking news about the earthquake on TV.	follow breaking news, breaking news alert, breaking news story
headline	n	/ˈhedlaɪn/	tiêu đề tin tức	The headline caught my attention immediately.	make headlines, front-page headline, attention-grabbing headline
coverage	n	/ˈkʌvərɪdʒ/	sự đưa tin, phủ sóng	The media coverage of the event was extensive.	news coverage, extensive coverage, live coverage, media coverage
outbreak	n	/ˈaʊtbreɪk/	sự bùng phát (dịch bệnh)	The outbreak of the virus became international news.	disease outbreak, sudden outbreak, outbreak of violence
devastating	adj	/ˈdevəsteɪtɪŋ/	tàn phá, gây thiệt hại nặng nề	The devastating earthquake destroyed thousands of homes.	devastating impact, devastating consequences, devastating news
unprecedented	adj	/ʌnˈpresɪdentɪd/	chưa từng có tiền lệ	The pandemic created an unprecedented global crisis.	unprecedented level, unprecedented scale, unprecedented situation
disseminate	v	/dɪˈsemɪneɪt/	phổ biến, truyền bá (thông tin)	Social media helps disseminate news quickly.	disseminate information, widely disseminated, disseminate knowledge
credibility	n	/ˌkredəˈbɪləti/	độ tin cậy	The news source lost its credibility after publishing fake news.	maintain credibility, establish credibility, damage credibility, journalistic credibility
sensationalize	v	/senˈseɪʃənəlaɪz/	làm giật gân, phóng đại	Some media outlets sensationalize stories to attract viewers.	sensationalized reporting, sensationalize events
proliferation	n	/prəˌlɪfəˈreɪʃn/	sự gia tăng nhanh chóng	The proliferation of fake news is concerning.	rapid proliferation, proliferation of information, nuclear proliferation
misinformation	n	/ˌmɪsɪnfəˈmeɪʃn/	thông tin sai lệch	Misinformation spreads faster than accurate news.	spread misinformation, combat misinformation, deliberate misinformation
verify	v	/ˈverɪfaɪ/	xác minh, kiểm chứng	Journalists should verify facts before publishing.	verify information, independently verified, verify sources
humanitarian crisis	n phrase	/hjuːˌmænɪˈteəriən ˈkraɪsɪs/	khủng hoảng nhân đạo	The war created a massive humanitarian crisis.	address humanitarian crisis, humanitarian crisis response
geopolitical	adj	/ˌdʒiːoʊpəˈlɪtɪkl/	thuộc về địa chính trị	The event had significant geopolitical implications.	geopolitical tensions, geopolitical situation, geopolitical factors
ripple effect	n phrase	/ˈrɪpl ɪˌfekt/	hiệu ứng lan tỏa	The economic crisis had a ripple effect across the globe.	create ripple effect, ripple effect throughout
mobilize	v	/ˈmoʊbəlaɪz/	huy động, vận động	The disaster mobilized international aid efforts.	mobilize support, mobilize resources, quickly mobilized
polarize	v	/ˈpoʊləraɪz/	tạo ra sự phân cực	The controversial issue polarized public opinion.	deeply polarized, polarize society, increasingly polarized
scrutinize	v	/ˈskruːtənaɪz/	xem xét kỹ lưỡng	We should scrutinize news sources carefully.	closely scrutinize, scrutinize information, heavily scrutinized
bias	n	/ˈbaɪəs/	thành kiến, thiên vị	Every news source has some degree of bias.	media bias, confirmation bias, political bias, unconscious bias
impartial	adj	/ɪmˈpɑːrʃl/	công bằng, không thiên vị	Good journalists strive to be impartial.	remain impartial, impartial reporting, impartial observer

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
make headlines	trở thành tin tức nổi bật	The story made headlines around the world.	7.5-8
hit close to home	gây ảnh hưởng cá nhân sâu sắc	The news about the disaster hit close to home because I’d visited that area.	8-9
stay informed	cập nhật thông tin	It’s important to stay informed about global events.	7-8
catch someone’s attention	thu hút sự chú ý của ai	The unusual headline caught my attention.	7-7.5
the tip of the iceberg	phần nổi của tảng băng (chỉ là phần nhỏ của vấn đề)	The reported cases are just the tip of the iceberg.	8-9
food for thought	điều đáng suy nghĩ	The documentary provided real food for thought about climate change.	7.5-8
a double-edged sword	con dao hai lưỡi	Social media is a double-edged sword for news dissemination.	8-9
take something with a grain of salt	không tin hoàn toàn, giữ thái độ hoài nghi	You should take news from unreliable sources with a grain of salt.	8-8.5
keep someone in the loop	giữ cho ai đó cập nhật thông tin	News apps keep us in the loop about international events.	7-8
spread like wildfire	lan truyền rất nhanh	The fake news spread like wildfire on social media.	7.5-8
raise awareness	nâng cao nhận thức	International news helps raise awareness about global issues.	7-7.5
bring to light	vạch trần, làm sáng tỏ	Investigative journalism brings important issues to light.	8-8.5

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Sử dụng khi cần một chút thời gian suy nghĩ, tạo sự tự nhiên
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi muốn đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc clarify điểm nào đó
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi nói thật về quan điểm cá nhân
• 📝 I’d say that… – Cách mềm mại để đưa ra quan điểm
• 📝 That’s an interesting question,… – Thể hiện bạn đang suy nghĩ về câu hỏi

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, bổ sung thêm
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, điều quan trọng hơn
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
• 📝 In addition to this,… – Ngoài điều này ra
• 📝 Another point worth mentioning is… – Một điểm đáng nói khác là

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét
• 📝 That being said,… – Tuy nhiên, dù vậy
• 📝 Having said that,… – Sau khi nói điều đó

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, xét tất cả các mặt
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng, rốt cuộc
• 📝 In the final analysis,… – Khi phân tích cuối cùng

Để đưa ra ví dụ:

• 📝 For instance,… – Ví dụ như
• 📝 Take… for example,… – Lấy… làm ví dụ
• 📝 A case in point is… – Một trường hợp điển hình là
• 📝 To illustrate this,… – Để minh họa điều này

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional:

• Formula: If + past perfect, would/could + bare infinitive
• Ví dụ: “If social media hadn’t existed, the news wouldn’t have spread so quickly.”

Inversion (đảo ngữ):

• Formula: Had/Were/Should + subject + verb
• Ví dụ: “Had I known about the event earlier, I would have followed it more closely.”
• “Were governments to control all news, democracy would be at risk.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

• Formula: …, which/who + verb…
• Ví dụ: “The earthquake, which struck early in the morning, caught everyone by surprise.”
• “International news, which shapes public opinion, plays a crucial role in democracy.”

Reduced relative clauses:

• Ví dụ: “Stories reported by credible sources are more trustworthy.”
• “The information shared on social media often lacks verification.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive (commonly used in academic/formal contexts):

• It is thought/believed/said that…
• Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that fake news influences election outcomes.”
• “It has been reported that the disaster affected millions of people.”

Passive with modal verbs:

• Ví dụ: “News sources should be verified before sharing.”
• “The impact of international events can be felt globally.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What-cleft:

• Formula: What + subject + verb + is/was…
• Ví dụ: “What I find most concerning is how quickly misinformation spreads.”
• “What really caught my attention was the international response to the crisis.”

It-cleft:

• Formula: It + is/was + noun phrase + that/who…
• Ví dụ: “It was the humanitarian aspect that made this news so impactful.”
• “It’s the credibility of sources that matters most.”

5. Advanced Cause-Effect Structures:

Lead to / Result in / Give rise to:

• Ví dụ: “The proliferation of social media has led to faster news dissemination.”
• “This event resulted in widespread international cooperation.”

Contribute to / Account for:

• Ví dụ: “Several factors contribute to the spread of fake news.”
• “Algorithms account for much of the viral nature of certain stories.”

6. Expressing Uncertainty and Nuance:

Modal verbs of speculation:

• Ví dụ: “This could potentially change how we consume news.”
• “The effects might be more far-reaching than we initially thought.”

Tentative expressions:

• Ví dụ: “It seems that people are becoming more skeptical of traditional media.”
• “There appears to be a growing trend toward digital news consumption.”

Chủ đề tin tức quốc tế trong IELTS Speaking đòi hỏi không chỉ vốn từ vựng phong phú mà còn khả năng phân tích, so sánh và đánh giá các vấn đề xã hội phức tạp. Những bài mẫu và chiến lược trên đây đã cung cấp cho bạn một roadmap chi tiết từ band 6-7 đến 8-9. Đối với những bạn đang học IELTS Speaking, việc nắm vững cách miêu tả các sự kiện có ý nghĩa cá nhân, tương tự như khi describe a book that had a major impact on your life, sẽ giúp bạn phát triển kỹ năng kể chuyện tự nhiên và có chiều sâu.

Hãy nhớ rằng, để đạt band điểm cao, bạn cần thực hành đều đặn với các chủ đề đa dạng. Khi thảo luận về sự nổi tiếng và truyền thông, việc trả lời câu hỏi như is it easier to become famous now ielts sẽ giúp bạn làm quen với việc phân tích các xu hướng xã hội, một kỹ năng quan trọng khi nói về tin tức quốc tế. Tương tự, kinh nghiệm trong việc describe a memorable day you had with friends có thể được áp dụng để kể về những trải nghiệm cá nhân liên quan đến các sự kiện tin tức.

Điểm then chốt là phải thực hành speaking hàng ngày, recording lại để tự đánh giá, và không ngừng mở rộng vốn từ vựng topic-specific. Khi bạn có thể tự tin thảo luận về các vấn đề toàn cầu với ngôn ngữ sophisticated và critical thinking rõ ràng, band 8-9 hoàn toàn nằm trong tầm tay. Chúc các bạn ôn thi hiệu quả và đạt được kết quả như mong muốn trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking sắp tới. Và nếu bạn quan tâm đến các chủ đề liên quan đến con người nổi tiếng, đừng bỏ qua cơ hội luyện tập với đề tài describe a famous actor or actress in your country để hoàn thiện kỹ năng miêu tả và phân tích nhân vật.