IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe A Person Who Is Skilled At Public Speaking” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề “Describe A Person Who Is Skilled At Public Speaking” là một đề bài phổ biến trong IELTS Speaking Part 2, xuất hiện thường xuyên trong các kỳ thi từ năm 2020 đến nay. Đây là chủ đề thuộc nhóm “Describe a person”, yêu cầu thí sinh mô tả một người có kỹ năng nói trước công chúng xuất sắc. Chủ đề này không chỉ kiểm tra khả năng sử dụng từ vựng mô tả con người mà còn đánh giá kỹ năng diễn đạt về tính cách, kỹ năng giao tiếp và tác động của người đó lên người khác.

Theo thống kê từ các đề thi thực tế, chủ đề về “kỹ năng giao tiếp” và “người có ảnh hưởng” xuất hiện với tần suất cao, khoảng 15-20% trong các đề thi Speaking Part 2. Khả năng xuất hiện của chủ đề này trong tương lai vẫn ở mức cao do tính thực tế và khả năng mở rộng thảo luận phong phú.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được các câu hỏi thường gặp trong cả 3 Part của IELTS Speaking liên quan đến chủ đề này, bài mẫu chi tiết theo nhiều band điểm từ 6-7, 7.5-8 đến 8.5-9, kho từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm, cùng với chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của một examiner. Đặc biệt, bài viết sẽ phân tích sâu lý do tại sao một câu trả lời đạt band điểm nhất định và cách cải thiện để đạt điểm cao hơn.

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về cuộc sống hàng ngày. Examiner sẽ hỏi về bản thân, sở thích, công việc hoặc học tập của bạn. Đặc điểm của Part 1 là các câu hỏi khá đơn giản, nhưng yêu cầu bạn trả lời tự nhiên và mở rộng ý với 2-3 câu cho mỗi câu hỏi.

Chiến lược hiệu quả cho Part 1 là trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi ngay từ câu đầu tiên, sau đó đưa ra lý do hoặc giải thích, và cuối cùng thêm một ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân. Điều quan trọng là phải tránh trả lời quá ngắn chỉ với “Yes” hoặc “No”.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 1 bao gồm trả lời quá ngắn gọn không đủ thông tin, sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản lặp đi lặp lại, và thiếu ví dụ cụ thể để minh họa cho ý kiến của mình. Nhiều học viên cũng có xu hướng nói quá nhanh do lo lắng, dẫn đến phát âm không rõ ràng.

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you like giving presentations or speaking in front of people?

Question 2: Have you ever had to speak in public?

Question 3: What kind of public speaking events do you usually attend?

Question 4: Do you think public speaking is an important skill?

Question 5: How do you feel when you have to speak in front of a group?

Question 6: Have you received any training in public speaking?

Question 7: Who do you think is a good public speaker?

Question 8: Do you watch public speaking competitions or TED talks?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you like giving presentations or speaking in front of people?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có thích hay không
• Đưa ra lý do cho cảm xúc của bạn
• Thêm ví dụ hoặc kinh nghiệm cá nhân

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“To be honest, I find it quite challenging. I usually get nervous when I have to speak in front of many people because I worry about making mistakes. However, I’m trying to improve this skill because it’s important for my studies.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp, có đưa ra lý do và thể hiện ý thức cải thiện
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (challenging, nervous, mistakes), cấu trúc câu khá cơ bản, thiếu ví dụ cụ thể
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời đủ thông tin nhưng chưa có độ sâu, vocabulary adequate nhưng chưa sophisticated, grammar đúng nhưng đơn giản

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, I’d say it’s a mixed bag for me. While I do experience some initial apprehension before speaking in front of an audience, I actually find it quite exhilarating once I get into the flow. Last month, I had to deliver a presentation on environmental issues to about 50 people, and although my hands were shaking at first, the sense of accomplishment afterward was quite rewarding.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng idiom “mixed bag” tự nhiên, từ vựng tinh vi (initial apprehension, exhilarating, sense of accomplishment), cấu trúc câu phức tạp với while-clause, ví dụ cụ thể với số liệu và cảm xúc chi tiết
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency tự nhiên với discourse marker “Well, I’d say”, Vocabulary đa dạng và chính xác, Grammar có sự đa dạng (complex sentences, perfect tenses), Ideas sâu sắc với sự phát triển logic từ cảm xúc ban đầu đến kết quả

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• mixed bag: cảm xúc lẫn lộn, không rõ ràng hoàn toàn tích cực hay tiêu cực
• initial apprehension: sự lo lắng ban đầu
• exhilarating: thú vị, hứng khởi
• deliver a presentation: thuyết trình, trình bày
• sense of accomplishment: cảm giác thành tựu

---

Question: Do you think public speaking is an important skill?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đưa ra quan điểm rõ ràng (có hoặc không)
• Giải thích lý do với 2-3 điểm
• Đưa ra ví dụ minh họa từ xã hội hoặc kinh nghiệm

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think it’s very important. In many jobs, people need to present their ideas clearly to others. Also, it helps build confidence and communication skills. For example, teachers and business people use this skill every day.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Quan điểm rõ ràng, có đưa ra lý do và ví dụ
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng cơ bản (important, present ideas, confidence), ví dụ chung chung, thiếu depth trong phân tích
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Trả lời đầy đủ nhưng thiếu sự phát triển ý tưởng sâu, vocabulary adequate nhưng repetitive, grammar đơn giản

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Absolutely, I’d say it’s become increasingly crucial in today’s world. Effective public speaking isn’t just about conveying information; it’s about inspiring and persuading others, which is essential in virtually every professional field. For instance, even in technical roles like engineering, being able to articulate complex ideas to non-technical stakeholders can be the difference between a project getting approved or rejected. Beyond career benefits, it also fosters self-confidence and helps people advocate for causes they believe in.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Từ vựng tinh vi và chính xác (increasingly crucial, conveying information, articulate complex ideas, advocate for causes), cấu trúc câu phức tạp với nhiều clauses, ý tưởng phát triển từ career benefits đến personal development, ví dụ cụ thể và có depth
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency xuất sắc với “Absolutely, I’d say”, Vocabulary precise và sophisticated, Grammar đa dạng với gerunds và complex structures, Ideas well-developed với nhiều góc nhìn

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• increasingly crucial: ngày càng quan trọng
• conveying information: truyền tải thông tin
• inspiring and persuading: truyền cảm hứng và thuyết phục
• articulate complex ideas: diễn đạt các ý tưởng phức tạp một cách rõ ràng
• foster self-confidence: nuôi dưỡng sự tự tin
• advocate for causes: ủng hộ, vận động cho các mục đích

---

Question: How do you feel when you have to speak in front of a group?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Mô tả cảm xúc thật của bạn
• Giải thích nguyên nhân của cảm xúc đó
• Có thể đề cập đến sự thay đổi theo thời gian

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I usually feel quite nervous and my heart beats faster. This is because I’m afraid people will judge me if I make mistakes. But after speaking a few times, I feel more comfortable and the nervousness goes away.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Mô tả cảm xúc cụ thể, có đưa ra nguyên nhân, đề cập đến sự thay đổi
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng mô tả cảm xúc còn đơn giản (nervous, afraid, comfortable), thiếu vivid description, grammar structures khá basic
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Nội dung đủ nhưng thiếu sự phong phú trong cách diễn đạt, vocabulary adequate nhưng chưa impressive

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, I’d be lying if I said I was completely calm. There’s definitely a rush of adrenaline and I can feel my palms getting sweaty right before I start. I think it stems from a fear of being judged or stumbling over my words. However, I’ve learned to channel that nervous energy into enthusiasm, and once I establish eye contact with a few friendly faces in the audience, the anxiety tends to dissipate gradually. It’s quite fascinating how our perception can shift so dramatically within just a few minutes.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Honest và natural với “I’d be lying if I said”, từ vựng descriptive và vivid (rush of adrenaline, palms getting sweaty, stumbling over words), cấu trúc câu sophisticated với multiple clauses, phát triển ý từ cảm xúc tiêu cực đến cách xử lý, kết thúc với reflection sâu sắc
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency tự nhiên với conversational style, Vocabulary precise và expressive, Grammar đa dạng với gerunds và complex sentences, Ideas insightful với personal growth narrative

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• rush of adrenaline: cảm giác hồi hộp, adrenaline dâng trào
• palms getting sweaty: lòng bàn tay đổ mồ hôi
• stumbling over my words: nói lắp bắp, không trôi chảy
• channel that nervous energy: chuyển hóa năng lượng lo lắng
• establish eye contact: thiết lập giao tiếp bằng mắt
• dissipate gradually: tan biến dần dần

Tương tự như describe a time when you visited a relative, việc mô tả cảm xúc và kinh nghiệm cá nhân một cách chi tiết sẽ giúp câu trả lời của bạn thêm phần thuyết phục và tự nhiên.

Kỹ năng nói trước công chúng trong bài thi IELTS Speaking Part 1

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 3-4 phút bao gồm 1 phút chuẩn bị và 2-3 phút nói. Đây là phần độc thoại trong đó bạn sẽ nhận được một thẻ câu hỏi (cue card) và phải nói liên tục về chủ đề đó mà không bị examiner ngắt lời.

Chiến lược quan trọng nhất cho Part 2 là sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi chú các từ khóa chính, không phải viết câu hoàn chỉnh. Bạn cần nói đủ ít nhất 1.5-2 phút để đạt điểm tốt. Hãy đảm bảo trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trong cue card và sử dụng thì động từ phù hợp với yêu cầu đề bài.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam là không tận dụng hết thời gian chuẩn bị, nói quá ngắn dưới 1.5 phút, bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points, hoặc sử dụng sai thì động từ. Nhiều học viên cũng có xu hướng nói quá chung chung mà không có details cụ thể.

Cue Card

Describe a person who is skilled at public speaking

You should say:

• Who this person is
• How you know about this person
• What topics he/she usually speaks about
• And explain why you think he/she is skilled at public speaking

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person – mô tả một người có kỹ năng cụ thể

Thì động từ: Hiện tại đơn (Present Simple) vì mô tả một người hiện tại và kỹ năng của họ. Có thể sử dụng quá khứ đơn khi kể về lần đầu biết đến người đó.

Bullet points phải cover:

• Who this person is: Cần giới thiệu rõ ràng danh tính người đó (tên, nghề nghiệp, vai trò)
• How you know about this person: Giải thích mối quan hệ hoặc cách bạn biết đến họ
• What topics he/she usually speaks about: Nêu cụ thể các chủ đề họ thường nói
• And explain why…: Phân tích chi tiết các yếu tố làm nên kỹ năng public speaking của họ

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là phần ghi điểm cao nhất. Bạn cần phân tích sâu về kỹ năng public speaking của người đó thông qua các yếu tố như: ngôn ngữ cơ thể, giọng điệu, cách tổ chức ý tưởng, khả năng tương tác với khán giả, và tác động của họ lên người nghe. Phần này nên chiếm khoảng 40-50% thời lượng bài nói.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about my English teacher, Ms. Lan, who is really good at public speaking. She has been teaching at my university for about five years now, and I’ve been her student for two years.

I first knew about her when I attended her English communication class. She teaches us about English grammar, vocabulary, and also about communication skills. Sometimes she also gives talks about career development and study abroad opportunities.

Ms. Lan is an excellent public speaker for several reasons. First, she always speaks very clearly and at a good pace, so everyone can understand her easily. She also uses simple examples from daily life to explain difficult concepts. Second, she is very confident when speaking in front of large groups. Even when there are more than 100 students in the lecture hall, she never seems nervous.

Moreover, she knows how to make her presentations interesting. She often uses videos, pictures, and real-life stories to keep students engaged. She also asks questions during her talks to make sure everyone is following. Another thing I notice is that she always maintains eye contact with the audience, which makes people feel connected to her.

What impresses me most is her ability to handle difficult questions. When students ask complicated questions, she always stays calm and gives clear, thoughtful answers. She never makes anyone feel bad for asking questions.

I think Ms. Lan is skilled at public speaking because she combines knowledge with good communication techniques. She has taught me that public speaking is not just about speaking well, but also about connecting with your audience.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Bài nói có cấu trúc rõ ràng, trả lời đủ các bullet points. Sử dụng linking words cơ bản (First, Second, Moreover, Another thing). Có một vài pauses nhẹ nhưng không ảnh hưởng nhiều đến message
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng adequate và relevant (excellent public speaker, maintain eye contact, engaged). Có một số collocations tốt (career development, study abroad, lecture hall) nhưng chủ yếu là vocabulary phổ biến
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Sử dụng mix của simple và complex sentences. Có present perfect (has been teaching, I’ve been her student), relative clauses (who is really good at). Một số errors nhỏ nhưng không ảnh hưởng comprehension
Pronunciation	6-7	Phát âm rõ ràng, dễ hiểu. Word stress và sentence stress cơ bản chính xác

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trong cue card
• ✅ Có cấu trúc logic với introduction, body, và conclusion
• ✅ Đưa ra nhiều ví dụ cụ thể về kỹ năng của Ms. Lan
• ✅ Thời lượng phù hợp, khoảng 1.5-2 phút

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Từ vựng chưa sophisticated, chủ yếu dùng từ phổ biến (very good, really good, excellent)
• ⚠️ Thiếu idiomatic expressions hoặc less common vocabulary
• ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đa dạng, thiếu advanced structures
• ⚠️ Phần explain chưa đủ sâu về impact và specific techniques

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to describe a renowned motivational speaker named Trung Quân, who I consider to be exceptionally skilled at public speaking. He’s actually a self-made entrepreneur who rose to prominence through his inspiring talks about personal development and business leadership.

I first came across him about two years ago when a video of his speech went viral on social media. I was immediately captivated by his delivery style and decided to attend one of his live seminars last year. Since then, I’ve been following his work quite closely and have attended several of his presentations.

Trung Quân typically speaks on topics related to entrepreneurship, overcoming adversity, and building resilience. What makes his talks particularly engaging is that he draws heavily from his own experiences, having built his business from scratch despite numerous setbacks. His speeches often revolve around practical strategies for success rather than just theoretical concepts.

What truly sets him apart as a public speaker is his remarkable ability to connect with his audience on an emotional level. He has this natural charisma that commands attention from the moment he steps on stage. His voice modulation is absolutely perfect – he knows exactly when to raise his voice for emphasis and when to speak softly to draw people in. I’ve noticed he’s also a master of strategic pausing, which gives the audience time to absorb key messages.

Another aspect that impresses me is his storytelling prowess. Rather than bombarding the audience with statistics and facts, he weaves compelling narratives that resonate with people. He also incorporates humor at just the right moments, which helps break the ice and keeps everyone engaged throughout his presentations.

Furthermore, he demonstrates excellent stage presence and body language. He moves around the stage naturally, uses meaningful hand gestures, and maintains eye contact with different sections of the audience. This creates an intimate atmosphere even in large venues.

I believe Trung Quân is exceptionally skilled at public speaking because he’s mastered the art of combining content with delivery. He doesn’t just share information; he creates an experience that leaves a lasting impact on his listeners.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Speaks fluently với minimal hesitation. Sử dụng cohesive devices sophisticatedly (Furthermore, Rather than, Another aspect). Ideas được develop logically và connected smoothly
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range of vocabulary (renowned, captivated, adversity, modulation, prowess). Nhiều collocations chính xác (self-made entrepreneur, drew people in, weaves compelling narratives). Sử dụng less common vocabulary appropriately
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Nhiều complex structures (relative clauses, present perfect continuous, gerunds). Grammar chính xác với very few errors. Demonstrates flexibility trong việc sử dụng different tenses
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear pronunciation với appropriate intonation patterns. Word stress và sentence stress chính xác

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“really good at”, “excellent speaker”	“exceptionally skilled at”, “renowned motivational speaker”, “remarkable ability”
Grammar	Simple: “She always speaks very clearly”	Complex: “What truly sets him apart is his remarkable ability to connect…”
Ideas	General: “uses videos and pictures”	Specific: “strategic pausing”, “voice modulation”, “weaves compelling narratives”

Việc phát triển ý tưởng chi tiết và sử dụng từ vựng chính xác tương tự như cách describe a book that had a major impact on your life giúp câu trả lời của bạn thêm phần ấn tượng.

Diễn giả xuất sắc với kỹ năng thuyết trình chuyên nghiệp trong hội thảo

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to talk about a truly exceptional public speaker I greatly admire – Barack Obama, the former President of the United States. While I’ve never met him in person, I’ve been thoroughly captivated by his oratory skills through watching numerous speeches he’s delivered over the years, and I consider him to be a masterclass in the art of public speaking.

My fascination with his speaking ability began during his 2008 presidential campaign when I watched his famous “Yes We Can” speech online. What struck me immediately was not just what he said, but how he said it. Since then, I’ve made it a point to study his various addresses, from State of the Union speeches to more intimate town hall meetings, and even his commencement addresses at universities.

Obama typically speaks on a wide spectrum of topics ranging from domestic policy and international relations to more personal subjects like race relations, social justice, and the importance of civic engagement. What’s particularly noteworthy is his ability to tackle complex, often divisive issues while maintaining a tone that’s both authoritative and inclusive. He has this rare gift of making political discourse accessible without dumbing it down.

What elevates Obama to the pinnacle of public speaking is his sophisticated blend of multiple rhetorical techniques. First and foremost, his command of language is absolutely impeccable. He employs powerful metaphors and carefully crafted parallel structures that make his messages both memorable and emotionally resonant. For instance, his use of anaphora – the repetition of phrases like “Yes We Can” – creates a rhythmic quality that’s almost poetic in its delivery.

His vocal dynamics are equally impressive. Obama modulates his tone masterfully, shifting seamlessly from intimate, conversational moments to rousing, inspirational crescendos. He understands the power of the dramatic pause – those strategic silences that allow ideas to sink in and build anticipation. I’ve noticed how he often lowers his voice when discussing serious matters, which paradoxically draws listeners in more effectively than shouting ever could.

What I find most compelling about his style is his authenticity and emotional intelligence. Unlike many politicians who seem to recite rehearsed lines, Obama conveys genuine conviction. His body language perfectly complements his words – the way he gesticulates with measured, purposeful movements, maintains sustained but natural eye contact, and occasionally allows a slight smile to break through during lighter moments. These elements create a sense of intimacy even when addressing thousands.

Furthermore, he demonstrates exceptional adaptability in his speaking style. He can code-switch effortlessly between formal, presidential rhetoric and more colloquial, relatable language depending on his audience. This versatility shows a profound understanding of communication as a two-way street rather than a one-directional broadcast.

Perhaps most importantly, Obama embodies the principle that effective public speaking transcends mere eloquence. He backs his rhetoric with substance, weaving in historical references, statistical evidence, and personal anecdotes in a way that’s intellectually satisfying yet emotionally engaging. His speeches don’t just inform or persuade; they inspire action and foster hope.

I believe Obama stands in a league of his own as a public speaker because he’s synthesized the technical mastery of oratory with genuine empathy and vision. He’s proven that public speaking at its finest is not about performance, but about forging meaningful connections and catalyzing positive change. His legacy serves as a benchmark for aspiring speakers and demonstrates that words, when wielded skillfully, can indeed shape history.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Speaks fluently và coherently với absolutely no noticeable effort. Sophisticated use of discourse markers. Ideas flow naturally và are fully developed với complex argumentation
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Extensive vocabulary với precise usage (impeccable, anaphora, crescendos, code-switch, catalyzing). Natural use of idiomatic language (in a league of his own, a two-way street). Collocations are sophisticated và accurate
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range of structures used naturally và accurately. Complex sentences với multiple clauses. Perfect control of tenses và grammatical features. Errors are rare và do not impede communication
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Clear và natural pronunciation với appropriate stress, rhythm, và intonation patterns throughout

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói trôi chảy tự nhiên không có hesitation. Các ý được phát triển logic với smooth transitions giữa các phần. Discourse markers được sử dụng sophisticatedly như “First and foremost”, “Furthermore”, “Perhaps most importantly”.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• “thoroughly captivated by his oratory skills” – sophisticated hơn nhiều so với “very interested in his speaking”
• “at the pinnacle of public speaking” – vivid metaphor cho excellence
• “emotionally resonant” – precise adjective cho impact
• “code-switch effortlessly” – technical term được sử dụng chính xác
• “catalyzing positive change” – powerful collocation

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• “What struck me immediately was not just what he said, but how he said it” – cleft sentence với parallel structure
• “Unlike many politicians who seem to recite rehearsed lines, Obama conveys genuine conviction” – complex comparison với relative clause
• “His speeches don’t just inform or persuade; they inspire action and foster hope” – sophisticated parallel structure với semicolon

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Bài nói không chỉ mô tả surface-level observations mà phân tích deeply về các rhetorical techniques như anaphora, vocal dynamics, code-switching. Demonstrates sophisticated understanding của public speaking như “a two-way street” và connects it với broader themes về leadership và social change.

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2:

Question 1: Do you think you could become a good public speaker like this person?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“I think it would be quite difficult, but I could improve with practice. I would need to work on my confidence and learn more presentation techniques.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Well, I’d say reaching that level of mastery would certainly be a formidable challenge, but I do believe that with deliberate practice and proper guidance, I could significantly enhance my public speaking abilities. It’s really about consistently stepping out of your comfort zone and learning from each speaking opportunity.”

---

Question 2: Have you ever tried to copy his/her speaking style?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, I have tried. I watched his speeches and tried to speak more slowly and clearly like him. It helped me feel more confident.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Actually, I have consciously incorporated certain elements of his style into my own presentations. For instance, I’ve been working on using more strategic pauses and varying my tone to emphasize key points. However, I’m careful not to simply mimic his style, as authenticity is crucial – it’s more about adapting principles that resonate with me rather than copying wholesale.”

Cách tiếp cận này có nét tương đồng với describe a wildlife area you visited khi bạn cần mô tả chi tiết các đặc điểm và tác động của một địa điểm hoặc người cụ thể.

Luyện tập kỹ năng nói chuyên nghiệp cho kỳ thi IELTS Speaking

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút và là phần thảo luận hai chiều giữa bạn và examiner về các vấn đề trừu tượng và sâu sắc hơn liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2. Đây là phần khó nhất trong IELTS Speaking vì yêu cầu bạn phải phân tích, so sánh, đánh giá các vấn đề ở cấp độ xã hội, không chỉ dừng lại ở kinh nghiệm cá nhân.

Yêu cầu chính của Part 3 là đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân có lý lẽ chặt chẽ, xem xét nhiều góc độ của vấn đề, và thể hiện khả năng suy nghĩ phản biện. Bạn cần sử dụng discourse markers để tổ chức ý tưởng, đưa ra examples từ xã hội hoặc nghiên cứu chứ không chỉ từ kinh nghiệm cá nhân, và thừa nhận sự phức tạp của vấn đề khi cần thiết.

Chiến lược hiệu quả là mở rộng câu trả lời với 3-5 câu, structure rõ ràng với direct answer → reasons → examples → conclusion/nuance. Sử dụng tentative language để thể hiện sự cân nhắc kỹ lưỡng như “I would say”, “It seems to me”, “To some extent”.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 3 bao gồm trả lời quá ngắn thiếu phân tích sâu, không đưa ra lý lẽ rõ ràng để support quan điểm, thiếu từ vựng trừu tượng để discuss các vấn đề xã hội, và chỉ nói về personal experience thay vì broader societal perspective.

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Importance of Public Speaking Skills

Question 1: Why do you think public speaking skills are becoming more important in modern society?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause/Reason question – yêu cầu giải thích nguyên nhân
• Key words: “becoming more important”, “modern society”
• Cách tiếp cận: Đưa ra 2-3 reasons với examples cụ thể từ workplace, education, hoặc social contexts

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think public speaking is becoming more important because of several reasons. First, many jobs now require people to present their ideas in meetings or conferences. Second, with social media, more people want to share their opinions publicly. Also, in a competitive job market, people with good communication skills have more advantages. For example, in job interviews, candidates who can speak confidently usually make better impressions.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có structure cơ bản với First, Second, Also
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng common (important, present ideas, share opinions, communication skills)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Trả lời đúng trọng tâm câu hỏi, có reasons và example nhưng thiếu depth trong phân tích, vocabulary chưa sophisticated

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Well, I’d say there are several interconnected factors driving this trend. Firstly, we’re living in what’s often called the information age, where the ability to articulate ideas clearly and persuasively has become a crucial competitive advantage in virtually every professional domain. Whether you’re pitching a business proposal, leading a team meeting, or presenting research findings, effective communication can make or break opportunities.

Moreover, the democratization of media platforms has fundamentally transformed how influence operates in society. With the rise of TED talks, YouTube, and social media, individuals can now reach global audiences without traditional gatekeepers. This means that thought leaders and change-makers increasingly need polished public speaking abilities to amplify their messages and build credibility.

Another dimension to consider is the shift toward collaborative work environments. Unlike the hierarchical structures of the past, modern workplaces emphasize cross-functional teamwork and stakeholder engagement, which necessitates strong presentation skills at all organizational levels. Even technical professionals like engineers or data scientists now find themselves needing to translate complex information into accessible narratives for diverse audiences.

I’d also argue that in an era of information overload, people who can cut through the noise and deliver compelling, memorable messages possess an invaluable asset. It’s not just about having good ideas anymore; it’s about being able to communicate them in ways that resonate and inspire action.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Excellently organized với Firstly, Moreover, Another dimension, I’d also argue – shows sophisticated discourse management
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated (interconnected factors, articulate ideas, democratization of media, thought leaders, amplify messages, hierarchical structures, stakeholder engagement, cut through the noise)
• Grammar: Complex structures với gerunds, relative clauses, và conditionals được woven naturally
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates multi-faceted analysis từ workplace changes đến media evolution và social dynamics. Shows balanced view với concrete examples

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, I’d say / Firstly / Moreover / Another dimension to consider / I’d also argue
• Tentative language: I’d say / often called / increasingly need
• Abstract nouns: democratization, credibility, stakeholder engagement, information overload
• Collocations: competitive advantage, make or break, thought leaders, cut through the noise

---

Question 2: What are the differences between public speaking in professional settings and in casual situations?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare and contrast question
• Key words: “differences”, “professional settings”, “casual situations”
• Cách tiếp cận: So sánh 2-3 aspects như formality, preparation, audience expectations, language choice

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“There are quite a few differences. In professional settings, speaking is usually more formal and structured. People prepare their speeches carefully and use professional language. In casual situations, speaking is more relaxed and natural. You don’t need to prepare much and can use informal language. Also, in professional contexts, the audience expects accurate information and clear presentations, while in casual talks, the focus is more on entertainment or sharing experiences.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear comparison với explicit contrasts
• Vocabulary: Adequate (formal, structured, relaxed, natural, accurate information)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points nhưng thiếu specific examples và sophisticated analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“That’s an interesting distinction to explore. I’d say the differences are quite pronounced across multiple dimensions.

In terms of formality and structure, professional public speaking typically adheres to more rigid conventions. You’re expected to follow established frameworks – whether that’s a standard presentation format with introduction, body, and conclusion, or specific protocols like parliamentary procedures in board meetings. By contrast, casual speaking situations allow for much more flexibility and spontaneity. You might digress into tangents, interrupt yourself with anecdotes, or shift topics organically based on audience reactions.

The stakes and preparation involved also differ dramatically. Professional presentations usually carry tangible consequences – you might be pitching for funding, representing your organization’s reputation, or influencing critical decisions. This necessitates meticulous preparation, including rehearsing delivery, anticipating questions, and crafting precise messaging. Casual speaking, on the other hand, is generally lower-stakes and can be far more improvised.

Language register represents another key distinction. In professional contexts, speakers typically employ more sophisticated vocabulary, avoid colloquialisms, and maintain grammatical precision. You’re also more likely to incorporate industry jargon and technical terminology. Casual speaking embraces informality – you might use slang, fragment sentences, or rely on shared cultural references that wouldn’t be appropriate in professional settings.

Perhaps most significantly, audience expectations and evaluation criteria vary considerably. Professional audiences often scrutinize not just content but delivery mechanics – your pacing, body language, and slide design all come under assessment. They’re listening with a critical ear for credibility and competence. Casual audiences are generally more forgiving and focused on entertainment value or emotional connection rather than rigorous analytical evaluation.

That said, I should mention that these boundaries are becoming increasingly blurred. Many successful professional speakers now incorporate casual, conversational elements to build rapport, while even informal settings sometimes benefit from more structured communication approaches.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-organized với clear topic sentences cho mỗi dimension of comparison. Uses sophisticated signposting (In terms of, another key distinction, Perhaps most significantly, That said)
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated và precise (pronounced, adheres to rigid conventions, digress into tangents, meticulous preparation, language register, scrutinize, increasingly blurred)
• Grammar: Complex sentences với multiple clauses, perfect control of comparative structures, sophisticated use of gerunds và infinitives
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis covering formality, preparation, language, và audience expectations. Acknowledges nuance at the end với “increasingly blurred” boundaries

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: That’s an interesting distinction / In terms of / By contrast / Perhaps most significantly / That said
• Comparative language: more rigid / differ dramatically / another key distinction / vary considerably
• Abstract nouns: formality, spontaneity, stakes, register, scrutinize, credibility
• Sophisticated collocations: adheres to conventions, tangible consequences, meticulous preparation, critical ear

Cách phân tích đa chiều này có điểm tương đồng với describe a park in your area where families like to gather khi bạn cần so sánh và đối chiếu các khía cạnh khác nhau của một địa điểm hoặc tình huống.

---

Theme 2: Education and Training

Question 1: Should public speaking be taught as a compulsory subject in schools?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion question với should – yêu cầu stance rõ ràng
• Key words: “compulsory subject”, “schools”
• Cách tiếp cận: State opinion → give reasons (educational benefits, life skills) → acknowledge counterarguments → conclude

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I believe it should be taught in schools. Public speaking is a very useful skill for students’ future careers. Many jobs require presentation skills, so learning it early would help students prepare better. Also, it can help shy students become more confident. However, some people might think it adds too much pressure to students who already have many subjects to study. But I think the benefits are more important than the extra workload.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Has clear opinion với some supporting reasons và acknowledgment của counterargument
• Vocabulary: Common words (useful skill, future careers, presentation skills, confident, pressure)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Opinion is clear nhưng arguments lack depth, vocabulary is adequate but not impressive, thiếu specific examples

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“I would strongly advocate for making public speaking a core component of the curriculum, though perhaps not necessarily as a standalone subject. Let me explain my reasoning.

From a developmental perspective, adolescence represents a critical window for cultivating communication competencies. Research in educational psychology suggests that skills developed during formative years tend to be more deeply ingrained and readily transferable to various contexts. By integrating public speaking instruction into the school curriculum, we’re essentially equipping students with a foundational life skill that transcends any specific career path.

Moreover, the benefits extend far beyond professional preparation. Public speaking education fosters critical thinking as students learn to organize their thoughts coherently, construct persuasive arguments, and evaluate evidence critically. It also addresses a significant gap in traditional education systems, which often prioritize written over oral communication. In reality, most professional and personal interactions rely heavily on verbal articulation, making this a glaring oversight in conventional curricula.

I’m also convinced that structured public speaking training could serve a vital social function by democratizing access to communication skills. Currently, students from more privileged backgrounds often have greater exposure to activities like debate clubs, drama, or Toastmasters, which cultivates these abilities. Mainstreaming public speaking education would level the playing field and ensure that all students, regardless of socioeconomic background, develop this crucial competency.

That being said, I do acknowledge legitimate concerns about overburdening already stretched curricula. The solution, in my view, isn’t adding yet another isolated subject but rather embedding public speaking components into existing courses. For instance, students could deliver oral presentations in science classes, participate in debates in social studies, or perform dramatic readings in literature courses. This cross-curricular approach would reinforce learning while developing speaking skills organically.

There’s also the question of teacher preparedness and resources. Rolling out effective public speaking programs would require substantial investment in professional development and potentially specialized instructors. However, I’d argue this is a worthwhile allocation of educational resources given the lifelong returns on this skillset.

In conclusion, while implementation challenges exist, I believe the compelling benefits of public speaking education – from enhanced employability to improved cognitive skills and greater social equity – make a strong case for its inclusion as a mandatory component of modern education.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated argumentation với clear thesis, multiple well-developed reasons, acknowledgment of counterarguments, practical solutions, và strong conclusion
• Vocabulary: Highly academic và precise (cultivating communication competencies, deeply ingrained, readily transferable, glaring oversight, democratizing access, level the playing field, cross-curricular approach, rolling out)
• Grammar: Full range of complex structures used naturally (conditional sentences, relative clauses, gerunds, passive voice)
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates nuanced thinking về multiple dimensions (developmental, professional, social equity). Acknowledges counterarguments và proposes practical solutions. Uses research references để support claims

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Let me explain my reasoning / Moreover / That being said / In conclusion
• Tentative language: I would strongly advocate / I’m convinced / in my view / I’d argue
• Abstract nouns: developmental perspective, competencies, oversight, social function, implementation
• Sophisticated collocations: critical window, fosters critical thinking, glaring oversight, level the playing field, rolling out programs

---

Question 2: How can people overcome their fear of public speaking?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Problem-solution/How question
• Key words: “overcome”, “fear”
• Cách tiếp cận: Provide multiple practical strategies với explanations và examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“There are several ways to overcome this fear. First, people should practice more often. The more you speak in public, the less nervous you become. Second, good preparation is important. When you know your material well, you feel more confident. Third, starting with small audiences can help. You can practice with friends or family first before speaking to larger groups. Also, techniques like deep breathing before speaking can help calm nerves. Finally, watching and learning from good speakers can give you ideas on how to improve.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear với multiple solutions listed systematically
• Vocabulary: Adequate (overcome fear, practice, preparation, confident, calm nerves)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Provides practical advice nhưng explanations lack depth, vocabulary is functional but not sophisticated

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Overcoming glossophobia – the fear of public speaking – is certainly a multifaceted challenge that requires a strategic, systematic approach. Based on both research and practical experience, I’d suggest several evidence-based strategies.

Gradual exposure is perhaps the most scientifically validated method. This involves deliberately and progressively exposing yourself to speaking situations, starting with low-stakes environments and incrementally increasing the challenge level. You might begin by speaking up in small team meetings, then progress to presenting to your department, and eventually tackle larger audiences. This desensitization process allows your brain to reframe public speaking from a threatening situation to a manageable task. It’s essentially retraining your nervous system’s threat response.

Thorough preparation serves as a powerful antidote to anxiety. When you’ve internalized your material and anticipated potential questions, your confidence naturally increases. However, I’d emphasize that effective preparation goes beyond just knowing your content – it includes rehearsing delivery, timing your presentation, and even visualizing yourself succeeding. This mental rehearsal activates similar neural pathways as actual performance, making the real experience feel more familiar.

Reframing your physiological responses can also be remarkably effective. Many people interpret symptoms like increased heart rate or sweaty palms as signs of fear or inadequacy. However, research suggests that reframing these same sensations as excitement or preparedness for peak performance can dramatically shift your psychological state. It’s about telling yourself “I’m excited” rather than “I’m nervous” – a subtle distinction that yields significant results.

I’d also recommend seeking constructive feedback and joining supportive communities like Toastmasters or public speaking clubs. These environments provide safe spaces to practice while receiving actionable insights on improvement. The social support aspect shouldn’t be underestimated – knowing that others share your challenges and celebrate your progress creates powerful motivation.

Mindfulness techniques and controlled breathing exercises offer immediate, practical tools for managing anxiety. Box breathing or 4-7-8 breathing can activate your parasympathetic nervous system, essentially telling your body to calm down. Practicing these techniques regularly makes them more effective when you need them most.

Perhaps most importantly, I believe people need to cultivate self-compassion and realistic expectations. Even seasoned speakers experience nervousness; the difference is they’ve learned to perform despite the discomfort. Perfectionism is often the enemy of progress in public speaking. Embracing imperfection and viewing each speaking opportunity as a learning experience rather than a test of worth can alleviate tremendous psychological pressure.

Finally, I’d suggest that understanding the source of your fear can be illuminating. Often, it’s rooted in fear of judgment, perfectionism, or past negative experiences. Addressing these underlying issues, sometimes with professional support if the fear is particularly debilitating, can lead to more lasting transformation.

The key is recognizing that overcoming public speaking anxiety is a journey, not a destination. It requires patience, consistent practice, and a willingness to step outside your comfort zone repeatedly. But the rewards – both personally and professionally – are truly transformative.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally comprehensive với multiple strategies, each thoroughly explained với scientific backing và practical applications. Logical progression từ behavioral techniques đến psychological approaches đến community support
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated và precise (glossophobia, desensitization process, antidote to anxiety, reframing physiological responses, cultivate self-compassion, debilitating)
• Grammar: Full mastery với complex structures seamlessly integrated, perfect control of gerunds, conditionals, và relative clauses
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates deep understanding của psychological principles underlying fear. Integrates research evidence với practical advice. Shows nuanced appreciation của journey vs. destination mindset

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Based on both research and practical experience / However / Perhaps most importantly / Finally
• Technical vocabulary: glossophobia, desensitization, parasympathetic nervous system, neural pathways
• Tentative language: I’d suggest / I’d emphasize / I believe / often
• Abstract nouns: exposure, antidote, reframing, mindfulness, self-compassion, transformation
• Sophisticated collocations: evidence-based strategies, retraining your nervous system, activates neural pathways, safe spaces to practice, debilitating fear

Cách đưa ra giải pháp toàn diện này tương tự như describe a traditional dish in your culture that you want to learn to cook khi bạn cần mô tả quy trình từng bước một cách chi tiết và logic.

Vượt qua nỗi sợ hãi nói trước công chúng với các kỹ thuật luyện tập hiệu quả

Theme 3: Technology and Communication

Question 1: How has technology changed the way people deliver presentations?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: How question về changes/impact
• Key words: “technology”, “changed”, “deliver presentations”
• Cách tiếp cận: Discuss multiple aspects của technological impact (tools, delivery methods, audience reach, preparation)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Technology has changed presentations a lot. Now people use PowerPoint or Google Slides to make their presentations more visual and interesting. They can add videos, animations, and images easily. Also, with video conferencing tools like Zoom, people can present to audiences in different locations. Technology has made it easier to record and share presentations online too. However, some people rely too much on slides and forget to connect with their audience.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists changes systematically with brief explanations
• Vocabulary: Common terminology (PowerPoint, visual, interesting, video conferencing)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main technological impacts nhưng analysis lacks depth, vocabulary is functional but not sophisticated, thiếu critical evaluation

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Technology has fundamentally revolutionized virtually every aspect of presentation delivery, creating both tremendous opportunities and novel challenges.

On the tools and resources front, the evolution has been nothing short of remarkable. Gone are the days of overhead projectors and static slide decks. Modern presentation software like PowerPoint, Prezi, or Canva offers unprecedented creative capabilities – from sophisticated data visualizations to embedded multimedia content and interactive elements. Presenters can now incorporate live polling, real-time Q&A sessions, and even augmented reality components to create immersive experiences that would have been inconceivable just a decade ago.

The democratization of production tools has also leveled the playing field considerably. Previously, creating professional-quality visuals required specialized expertise or expensive design services. Today, even individuals with limited technical skills can generate polished presentations using templates, stock images, and AI-powered design suggestions. This has raised the bar for visual quality across the board, but it’s also led to what some critics call “death by PowerPoint” – an overreliance on slides at the expense of genuine engagement.

Perhaps most transformative has been the shift in delivery modalities. Virtual and hybrid presentation formats have become mainstream, particularly accelerated by the pandemic. This has expanded potential reach exponentially – a speaker can now address global audiences without leaving their home. Platforms like TED and YouTube have created entirely new genres of public speaking, where talks are optimized not just for live audiences but for viral online dissemination. The production values and editing capabilities available post-recording add another dimension that live speaking can’t match.

However, this technological evolution comes with significant tradeoffs. Virtual presentations, while convenient, often sacrifice the energy and connection of in-person delivery. Reading an audience through screens is fundamentally more challenging than sensing real-time reactions in a physical space. There’s also the phenomenon of “Zoom fatigue” and competing distractions that make capturing and maintaining attention more difficult in digital environments.

The preparation process has transformed as well. Speakers now need to be proficient in multiple software platforms, understand basic principles of graphic design, and be able to troubleshoot technical issues on the fly. The skill set required has broadened considerably – it’s no longer sufficient to be an eloquent speaker; you must also be a capable technologist and visual communicator.

Interestingly, there’s been a countermovement as well. Some of the most impactful contemporary speakers deliberately eschew elaborate technology, returning to minimalist approaches that prioritize storytelling and authenticity over visual spectacle. Think of speakers who deliver entire talks with no slides at all, or who use deliberately simple visuals to avoid distraction. This suggests that while technology has expanded possibilities, the fundamentals of compelling communication – clear messaging, authentic delivery, and audience connection – remain paramount.

Looking forward, I anticipate emerging technologies like virtual reality, holographic projection, and AI-assisted speech coaching will continue to push boundaries. The challenge for speakers will be harnessing these tools strategically without letting technology overshadow substance, maintaining the human element that makes public speaking genuinely resonant.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Comprehensive analysis structured around multiple dimensions (tools, democratization, delivery modalities, tradeoffs, preparation, countermovement, future trends). Each section thoroughly developed với examples và critical evaluation
• Vocabulary: Exceptionally sophisticated (fundamentally revolutionized, unprecedented creative capabilities, democratization, dissemination, tradeoffs, eloquent, eschew, paramount, holographic projection)
• Grammar: Masterful control với varied complex structures, perfect use of tenses to discuss past changes và future projections, sophisticated use of parallel structures
• Critical Thinking: Balanced analysis acknowledging both benefits và drawbacks. References cultural phenomena (“death by PowerPoint”, “Zoom fatigue”). Discusses countertrends và future implications. Shows nuanced understanding rằng technology is tool, not substitute for substance

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: On the front / Perhaps most transformative / However / Interestingly / Looking forward
• Evaluative language: nothing short of remarkable / unprecedented / fundamentally more challenging / deliberately
• Abstract nouns: democratization, modalities, tradeoffs, phenomenon, countermovement, authenticity
• Sophisticated collocations: fundamentally revolutionized, leveled the playing field, raised the bar, sacrifice the energy, eschew elaborate technology, overshadow substance

---

Question 2: Do you think online presentations are as effective as face-to-face ones?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare and evaluate – opinion about effectiveness
• Key words: “online presentations”, “face-to-face”, “as effective”
• Cách tiếp cận: Consider multiple factors (engagement, connection, practical benefits) và provide nuanced answer

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think both have advantages and disadvantages. Face-to-face presentations are better for building connections because you can see people’s reactions directly and adjust your speech. The energy in the room is also better. However, online presentations are more convenient and can reach more people. You can also save time and money on travel. For effectiveness, it depends on the purpose. For important business meetings, face-to-face might be better. But for sharing information with many people, online can work well.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Balanced comparison với acknowledgment của context dependency
• Vocabulary: Adequate (advantages, disadvantages, building connections, convenient, effectiveness)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Provides reasonable comparison nhưng lacks depth in analysis, vocabulary is functional but not sophisticated, examples are general

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“That’s a nuanced question that I don’t think has a straightforward answer – it really depends on the specific objectives and context of the presentation. Let me unpack some key considerations.

In terms of human connection and engagement, face-to-face presentations generally have a distinct advantage. There’s an ineffable quality to physical presence – what some researchers call “social presence theory” – that’s difficult to replicate digitally. When you’re in the same room as your audience, you can pick up on subtle cues: micro-expressions, shifts in body language, energy fluctuations in the room. This real-time feedback loop allows speakers to modulate their delivery dynamically, sensing when to slow down, when to inject humor, or when an additional explanation is needed. This adaptive responsiveness is considerably more challenging in virtual settings where you’re often speaking to blank squares on a screen.

Moreover, face-to-face environments foster a shared experience that can be powerful for motivation and team building. There’s a collective energy – almost a palpable buzz – when a room full of people is captivated by a speaker. This social contagion effect, where enthusiasm spreads through the audience, is largely absent in online formats where participants are physically isolated.

However, I’d argue that online presentations possess their own distinct advantages that can, in certain contexts, make them equally or even more effective. The accessibility factor is huge – you can reach global audiences without the logistical constraints of travel, venue limitations, or scheduling conflicts across time zones. This dramatically expands potential impact. Organizations can deliver training to thousands simultaneously, or speakers can build followings that would be geographically impossible in purely face-to-face contexts.

Digital formats also offer unique engagement tools that face-to-face settings can’t match. Interactive features like chat functions, breakout rooms, live polls, and collaborative documents can actually facilitate certain types of participation better than traditional settings, particularly for introverted individuals who might be reluctant to speak up in physical rooms. I’ve attended virtual conferences where the chat backchannel created rich parallel conversations that enhanced rather than detracted from the main presentation.

There’s also the efficiency argument. Online presentations eliminate travel time and costs, making them more sustainable both economically and environmentally. The ability to record and replay sessions provides flexibility that benefits both presenters and audiences.

That said, we can’t ignore the very real limitations of virtual formats. “Zoom fatigue” is a documented phenomenon – the cognitive load of processing digital communication, combined with reduced mobility and increased self-awareness from seeing yourself on screen, can be genuinely draining. Technical difficulties remain a persistent challenge, and the barrier to disengagement is much lower online – it’s easy to multitask or tune out when you’re at home.

The effectiveness question ultimately hinges on the presentation’s purpose. For delivering information to large, distributed audiences, online formats can be highly efficient. For persuasive presentations requiring deep emotional resonance or complex negotiations demanding nuanced reading of counterparts, face-to-face interaction typically holds the edge. For regular team meetings or routine updates, hybrid approaches might offer the optimal balance.

I’d also note that emerging technologies are rapidly closing the gap. Improved video quality, virtual reality platforms, and AI-enhanced engagement tools are making digital presentations increasingly sophisticated. We may be approaching a convergence point where the experiential difference becomes negligible for many purposes.

In conclusion, rather than viewing them as competing modalities where one is inherently superior, I believe we should recognize them as complementary tools, each optimized for different scenarios. The most effective communicators in the modern era will be those who can leverage the unique strengths of both formats strategically.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-organized với clear thesis (“nuanced question”), systematic analysis của face-to-face advantages, online benefits, limitations, context-dependency, future trends, và thoughtful conclusion
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated và precise (ineffable quality, social presence theory, micro-expressions, adaptive responsiveness, social contagion effect, backchannel, documented phenomenon, convergence point, complementary tools)
• Grammar: Masterful variety including complex conditionals, relative clauses, gerunds, và sophisticated punctuation. Perfect control of comparative structures
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates exceptional analytical depth với reference to research concepts (social presence theory, Zoom fatigue). Provides balanced, nuanced view acknowledging múltiple perspectives. Considers future developments và offers practical framework for decision-making

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Let me unpack / Moreover / However / That said / Ultimately / In conclusion
• Hedging/Tentative language: I don’t think / generally / largely / I’d argue / typically / may be
• Abstract nouns: ineffable quality, responsiveness, contagion effect, accessibility, convergence, modalities
• Sophisticated collocations: nuanced question, subtle cues, adaptive responsiveness, palpable buzz, logistical constraints, cognitive load, holds the edge

Từ Vựng và Cụm Từ Quan Trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
articulate	v	/ɑːˈtɪkjuleɪt/	diễn đạt rõ ràng	She can articulate complex ideas in simple terms.	articulate thoughts/ideas/views/concerns
captivate	v	/ˈkæptɪveɪt/	làm say mê, thu hút	His storytelling ability captivates audiences of all ages.	captivate the audience/attention/imagination
charisma	n	/kəˈrɪzmə/	sức hút cá nhân, khí chất	His natural charisma makes people want to listen to him.	natural charisma, personal charisma, charismatic speaker
compelling	adj	/kəmˈpelɪŋ/	thuyết phục, hấp dẫn	She delivered a compelling argument for educational reform.	compelling narrative/argument/reason/evidence
command attention	phrase	/kəˈmɑːnd əˈtenʃn/	thu hút sự chú ý mạnh mẽ	Great speakers know how to command attention from the moment they start.	command respect/authority/attention
convey	v	/kənˈveɪ/	truyền đạt	He conveys his passion for the subject very effectively.	convey information/message/meaning/emotion
engage	v	/ɪnˈɡeɪdʒ/	thu hút, tương tác	She knows how to engage her audience through questions.	engage the audience/reader/students/participants
eloquent	adj	/ˈeləkwənt/	hùng biện, ngôn từ sáng suốt	His eloquent speech moved many people to tears.	eloquent speaker/speech/testimony/advocate
enthrall	v	/ɪnˈθrɔːl/	mê hoặc, làm say đắm	The speaker enthralled the audience with her personal stories.	enthrall the audience/crowd/listeners
impactful	adj	/ˈɪmpæktfl/	có tác động mạnh	His impactful presentation changed how we think about the issue.	impactful speech/message/presentation/storytelling
inspire	v	/ɪnˈspaɪər/	truyền cảm hứng	Her words inspire people to take action.	inspire confidence/hope/action/change
mesmerize	v	/ˈmezməraɪz/	mê hoặc, thôi miên	The audience was mesmerized by his powerful delivery.	mesmerize the audience/crowd/listeners
modulate	v	/ˈmɒdʒuleɪt/	điều chỉnh giọng nói	Skilled speakers modulate their voice to emphasize key points.	modulate voice/tone/speech/delivery
persuasive	adj	/pəˈsweɪsɪv/	thuyết phục	She has a very persuasive speaking style.	persuasive argument/speech/speaker/communication
poise	n	/pɔɪz/	sự bình tĩnh, thái độ điềm đạm	He maintained his poise even during difficult questions.	maintain poise, show poise, poise under pressure
resonate	v	/ˈrezəneɪt/	gây được tiếng vang, gây ấn tượng sâu sắc	Her message resonated deeply with young people.	resonate with audience/message/story/experience
rhetoric	n	/ˈretərɪk/	nghệ thuật hùng biện	He studied classical rhetoric to improve his speaking.	powerful rhetoric, political rhetoric, rhetorical devices
stage presence	phrase	/steɪdʒ ˈprezns/	khí chất trên sân khấu	Her strong stage presence commands respect instantly.	strong/powerful/natural stage presence

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
hold the audience in the palm of your hand	kiểm soát hoàn toàn sự chú ý của khán giả	The way she tells stories, she holds the audience in the palm of her hand.	8-9
command the room	làm chủ không gian, thu hút sự chú ý của mọi người	With his confident posture and clear voice, he really commands the room.	7.5-8
strike a chord	chạm đến cảm xúc, gây được tiếng vang	His speech about family values struck a chord with many listeners.	7.5-8
get your point across	truyền đạt ý kiến hiệu quả	She’s excellent at getting her point across without being aggressive.	7-8
think on your feet	ứng biến nhanh, xử lý tình huống bất ngờ	Good speakers can think on their feet when facing unexpected questions.	7.5-8
cut through the noise	nổi bật giữa rất nhiều thông tin khác	His clear, simple message cuts through the noise of complicated debates.	8-9
hit home	gây tác động mạnh, chạm đến trực tiếp vấn đề	Her personal anecdote really hit home with the audience.	7.5-8
weave a narrative	dệt nên câu chuyện mạch lạc	He skillfully weaves narratives that connect data with human experience.	8-9
have a way with words	có tài ăn nói	She really has a way with words that makes complex topics accessible.	7-8
break the ice	phá vỡ sự ngại ngùng, tạo bầu không khí thoải mái	He used humor to break the ice at the beginning of his presentation.	7-7.5

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Sử dụng khi cần một chút thời gian suy nghĩ hoặc để đưa ra câu trả lời cân nhắc
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi muốn đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc thông tin bất ngờ
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi muốn chia sẻ quan điểm thật lòng
• 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân một cách lịch sự

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, hơn thế nữa
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, thêm vào đó
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến, chưa nói đến
• 📝 Another aspect to consider is… – Một khía cạnh khác cần xem xét là
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Vượt ra ngoài điều đó

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng chúng ta cũng cần xem xét
• 📝 That being said,… – Dù vậy thì, tuy nhiên
• 📝 However, it’s worth noting that… – Tuy nhiên, đáng chú ý là

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, xét về tổng thể
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, khi đã xem xét mọi thứ
• 📝 In conclusion,… – Kết luận lại
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng, về cơ bản

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional:

• Formula: If + past perfect, would + infinitive
• Ví dụ: “If I had received proper training in public speaking earlier, I would be much more confident now.”

Inversion (Đảo ngữ):

• Formula: Had + subject + past participle, would have…
• Ví dụ: “Had he not practiced extensively, he wouldn’t have delivered such a powerful speech.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

• Formula: Subject + , which/who + verb + ,
• Ví dụ: “Barack Obama, who is widely regarded as an exceptional orator, studied rhetoric extensively.”

Reduced relative clauses:

• Formula: Subject + participle phrase
• Ví dụ: “The speaker standing on the stage captivated everyone with his presence.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive constructions:

• It is thought/believed/said that…: “It is widely believed that public speaking skills can be learned and improved.”
• Subject + is thought/believed/said to…: “He is considered to be one of the most influential speakers of our generation.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What-cleft:

• What I find most…, is…: “What I find most impressive about her speaking style is her ability to connect with diverse audiences.”
• Ví dụ: “What makes him an exceptional speaker is not just his words, but his genuine passion.”

It-cleft:

• It is/was… that…: “It was his storytelling ability that truly set him apart from other speakers.”
• Ví dụ: “It’s the authenticity in his delivery that resonates most with audiences.”

5. Inversion for Emphasis:

Negative inversion:

• Not only… but also: “Not only does she speak eloquently, but she also inspires people to take action.”
• Rarely/Seldom/Never: “Rarely have I seen a speaker who can command attention so effortlessly.”

6. Participle Clauses:

Present participle for simultaneous actions:

• Ví dụ: “Standing confidently on stage, he began his presentation with a compelling anecdote.”

Perfect participle for prior actions:

• Ví dụ: “Having studied various speaking techniques, she developed her own unique style.”

7. Advanced Comparison Structures:

The + comparative, the + comparative:

• Ví dụ: “The more you practice public speaking, the more confident you become.”

As + adjective + as:

• Ví dụ: “Her stage presence is as powerful as her message.”

Những cấu trúc này giúp câu trả lời của bạn đa dạng và sophisticated hơn nhiều, thể hiện khả năng sử dụng ngôn ngữ ở mức độ cao trong IELTS Speaking. Tương tự, việc nắm vững các cấu trúc ngữ pháp phức tạp cũng quan trọng trong các chủ đề khác, đặc biệt khi bạn muốn đạt band điểm cao trong kỳ thi IELTS.

---

Bài viết này đã cung cấp cho bạn cái nhìn toàn diện về cách trả lời chủ đề “Describe a person who is skilled at public speaking” trong IELTS Speaking. Từ các câu hỏi Part 1 đơn giản đến bài nói dài trong Part 2 và thảo luận sâu trong Part 3, bạn đã có trong tay các mẫu câu trả lời từ Band 6-7 đến Band 8.5-9 để tham khảo.

Điều quan trọng nhất là hiểu rõ sự khác biệt giữa các band điểm không chỉ nằm ở từ vựng hay ngữ pháp, mà còn ở độ sâu của ý tưởng, khả năng phân tích vấn đề từ nhiều góc độ, và cách bạn kết nối các ý một cách tự nhiên. Hãy luyện tập thường xuyên với các câu hỏi mẫu, ghi âm lại bài nói của mình để tự đánh giá, và không ngừng cải thiện những điểm còn yếu.

Chúc bạn thành công trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking!