IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề Describe A Nature Park You’d Like To Explore – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Mở bài

Chủ đề “Describe A Nature Park You’d Like To Explore” là một trong những đề bài phổ biến nhất trong IELTS Speaking Part 2, thuộc nhóm câu hỏi về địa điểm và thiên nhiên. Đây là dạng đề yêu cầu thí sinh mô tả một công viên tự nhiên mà họ muốn khám phá, thể hiện khả năng diễn đạt về môi trường, địa lý và sở thích cá nhân.

Theo thống kê từ các trung tâm thi IELTS trên toàn cầu, chủ đề về thiên nhiên và môi trường xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong các kỳ thi từ 2020 đến 2024, đặc biệt là sau đại dịch COVID-19 khi xu hướng du lịch sinh thái và kết nối với thiên nhiên trở nên phổ biến. Khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai được đánh giá ở mức Cao, do IELTS thường ưu tiên các chủ đề liên quan đến bảo vệ môi trường và phát triển bền vững.

Bài viết này sẽ cung cấp cho bạn:

• Câu hỏi thường gặp trong cả 3 Part của IELTS Speaking liên quan đến công viên tự nhiên và môi trường
• Bài mẫu chi tiết theo từng band điểm 6-7, 7.5-8 và 8.5-9 với phân tích chuyên sâu
• Hơn 50 từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm kèm cách sử dụng thực tế
• Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của một examiner 20 năm kinh nghiệm
• Những lỗi phổ biến nhất của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về cuộc sống hàng ngày. Với chủ đề thiên nhiên và công viên, examiner thường hỏi về thói quen, sở thích và kinh nghiệm cá nhân của bạn. Mục tiêu là tạo không khí thoải mái và đánh giá khả năng giao tiếp cơ bản.

Chiến lược quan trọng: Mỗi câu trả lời nên có 2-3 câu, bao gồm câu trả lời trực tiếp, lý do và ví dụ cụ thể. Tránh trả lời một từ như “Yes” hay “No”.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn gọn, thiếu mở rộng ý tưởng
• Sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “nice”, “beautiful”
• Không đưa ra ví dụ từ kinh nghiệm thực tế
• Ngại sử dụng thì hiện tại hoàn thành để nói về kinh nghiệm

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you like spending time in nature?

Question 2: How often do you visit parks or natural areas?

Question 3: Are there any parks near where you live?

Question 4: Did you visit parks often when you were a child?

Question 5: What do you usually do when you visit a park?

Question 6: Do you prefer natural parks or city parks?

Question 7: Would you like to live near a national park?

Question 8: Have you ever been camping in nature?

Question 9: What kind of outdoor activities do you enjoy?

Question 10: Do you think it’s important to protect natural areas?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you like spending time in nature?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp Yes/No
• Giải thích tại sao (cảm giác, lợi ích)
• Đưa ra ví dụ cụ thể về hoạt động yêu thích

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I do. I find it very relaxing to be in natural surroundings. Whenever I feel stressed from work, I usually go to a nearby park to walk around and breathe fresh air. It helps me feel better.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Câu trả lời rõ ràng, có lý do và ví dụ cụ thể về việc đi công viên khi stress
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (relaxing, feel better), cấu trúc câu chưa phức tạp, thiếu chi tiết cảm xúc sâu sắc hơn
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đủ thông tin cơ bản, mạch lạc nhưng chưa thể hiện được lexical resource và grammatical range cao

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Absolutely! I’m quite drawn to natural environments because they offer such a refreshing escape from the hustle and bustle of city life. I find that immersing myself in nature, whether it’s hiking through forests or simply sitting by a lake, has a remarkably calming effect on my mental wellbeing. In fact, I make it a point to visit natural areas at least once a month to recharge my batteries.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng collocation tự nhiên như “drawn to”, “refreshing escape”, “immersing myself”. Cấu trúc câu phức tạp với mệnh đề quan hệ “whether it’s…or…”. Thể hiện frequency với “at least once a month” và idiom “recharge my batteries”
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Trả lời trôi chảy với discourse marker “Absolutely”, “In fact”
  • Vocabulary: Sophisticated expressions như “remarkably calming effect”, “mental wellbeing”
  • Grammar: Sử dụng gerund, relative clause, complex sentences
  • Pronunciation: Từ vựng chọn lọc giúp phát âm tự nhiên hơn

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• be drawn to: bị thu hút bởi (cảm giác mạnh mẽ hơn “like”)
• refreshing escape: sự thoát ly sảng khoái
• immerse oneself in: đắm mình vào
• remarkably calming effect: tác động làm dịu đáng kể
• recharge one’s batteries: nạp lại năng lượng (idiom)

---

Question: How often do you visit parks or natural areas?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu tần suất cụ thể (once a week, twice a month…)
• Giải thích lý do cho tần suất đó
• Có thể so sánh với quá khứ để tăng độ phức tạp

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I try to visit parks about once or twice a month. I would go more often but I’m quite busy with work during weekdays. On weekends, I prefer going to parks in the early morning when it’s not too crowded.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có tần suất cụ thể, giải thích lý do (bận công việc), có chi tiết về thời gian ưa thích
• Hạn chế: Cấu trúc “I try to”, “I would go” chưa được khai thác triệt để, thiếu vocabulary về routine
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đủ thông tin nhưng vẫn ở mức adequate, chưa impressive

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, I’d say I make it a habit to visit natural areas roughly twice a month, though it really depends on my schedule. Ideally, I’d love to go more frequently, but with work commitments and other responsibilities, it’s not always feasible. That said, I’ve noticed I’m much more inclined to visit parks during spring and autumn when the weather is particularly pleasant – there’s something incredibly invigorating about being outdoors during those seasons.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Sử dụng discourse marker “Well” tự nhiên
  • Collocation “make it a habit” thay vì “try to”
  • Tentative language “I’d say”, “roughly” thể hiện native-like speaking
  • Thừa nhận constraint với “work commitments”
  • Thêm seasonal variation cho answer phong phú hơn
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Tự nhiên với filler “Well”, “That said”
  • Vocabulary: “invigorating”, “inclined to”, “feasible”, “particularly pleasant”
  • Grammar: Conditional “I’d love to”, relative clause “when the weather is”
  • Ideas: Multi-layered answer với frequency, constraint, seasonal preference

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• make it a habit: biến thành thói quen (mạnh hơn “try to”)
• work commitments: các công việc cam kết
• be inclined to: có khuynh hướng, thiên về
• particularly pleasant: đặc biệt dễ chịu
• invigorating: làm phấn chấn, tràn đầy sinh lực

---

Question: Did you visit parks often when you were a child?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Sử dụng thì quá khứ đơn hoặc “used to” để nói về thói quen quá khứ
• So sánh với hiện tại nếu có thể
• Thêm chi tiết về hoạt động cụ thể trong quá khứ

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I did. When I was young, my parents often took me to the park near our house on weekends. I remember playing on the swings and feeding the fish in the pond. It was a very happy time.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng thì quá khứ đúng, có chi tiết cụ thể về hoạt động
• Hạn chế: Câu trúc đơn giản, từ vựng cơ bản (playing, happy time)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đáp ứng yêu cầu cơ bản nhưng thiếu sophistication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Actually, yes – I have quite fond memories of visiting parks during my childhood. My family would often take weekend outings to a local park that had a beautiful lake and sprawling green spaces. What I remember most vividly is running around freely with other children, flying kites, and having picnics under the shade of old trees. Looking back, I think those experiences really instilled in me an appreciation for nature that I still carry today. It’s quite different from how children spend their time nowadays, mostly glued to screens.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • “Would often” cho habitual past action – sophisticated hơn “used to”
  • Rich descriptive language: “sprawling green spaces”, “running around freely”
  • Reflective element: “instilled in me”, “I still carry today”
  • Social commentary: so sánh với trẻ em hiện đại
  • Phrase “glued to screens” là colloquial expression tự nhiên
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Discourse marker “Actually”, “Looking back” tạo flow tự nhiên
  • Vocabulary: “fond memories”, “instilled in me”, “sprawling”, “vividly”
  • Grammar: Modal “would” cho past habit, gerund structures
  • Ideas: Không chỉ describe mà còn reflect và compare

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• fond memories: những kỷ niệm đẹp
• take weekend outings: đi chơi cuối tuần
• sprawling green spaces: không gian xanh rộng lớn
• instill in someone: thấm nhuần vào ai đó
• glued to screens: dán mắt vào màn hình (idiom)

Gia đình Việt Nam vui chơi tại công viên thiên nhiên với trẻ em đang thả diều và chơi đùa trên bãi cỏ xanh

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần quan trọng nhất của bài thi Speaking, kéo dài 3-4 phút bao gồm:

• 1 phút chuẩn bị (được cho giấy và bút ghi chú)
• 2 phút nói liên tục không bị gián đoạn
• 1-2 phút trả lời follow-up questions

Chiến lược quan trọng:

• Sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị: Chỉ ghi keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh. Viết theo từng bullet point
• Nói đủ 2 phút: Đây là yêu cầu tối thiểu. Nếu nói dưới 1.5 phút, bạn sẽ bị trừ điểm Fluency
• Cover tất cả bullet points: Examiner sẽ check xem bạn có trả lời đủ không
• Thì động từ: Chú ý đề bài – “you’d like to explore” là future/hypothetical nên dùng “would like to”, “hope to”, “plan to”

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Không tận dụng thời gian chuẩn bị, vội vàng nói luôn
• Nói quá nhanh và kết thúc sau 1 phút rồi im lặng
• Bỏ sót bullet point “explain why”
• Dùng sai thì (nói như đã đi rồi thay vì muốn đi)
• Không có ví dụ cụ thể, nói chung chung

Cue Card

Describe a nature park you’d like to explore

You should say:

• Where this nature park is
• How you learned about it
• What it is special about
• And explain why you would like to explore this park

Phân Tích Đề Bài

• Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a place (future/hypothetical) – mô tả địa điểm bạn muốn đến
• Thì động từ chính: Future forms (would like to, hope to, plan to), Present simple (để mô tả đặc điểm của công viên)
• Bullet points phải cover:
  • Where: Vị trí địa lý cụ thể (quốc gia, vùng)
  • How you learned about it: Nguồn thông tin (documentary, friend, social media, book…)
  • What is special: Đặc điểm độc đáo (địa hình, động thực vật, hoạt động…)
  • Why you want to explore: Lý do cá nhân (quan trọng nhất – chiếm 40% câu trả lời)
• Câu “explain why” quan trọng: Đây là phần ghi điểm cao nhất vì cần critical thinking, personal reflection. Không chỉ nói “because it’s beautiful” mà phải sâu hơn – ảnh hưởng gì đến bạn, ý nghĩa gì với bạn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park in Vietnam, which I really want to visit someday. It’s located in Quang Binh Province, in the central part of Vietnam.

I first learned about this park from a travel documentary I watched on television about two years ago. The documentary showed amazing caves and beautiful forests, which really caught my attention. After that, I also saw many pictures of this park on social media from people who had visited there.

What makes this park special is that it has some of the largest caves in the world, including Son Doong Cave. The documentary showed that these caves have underground rivers and very tall ceilings. The park also has thick forests and many rare animals and plants. It’s a UNESCO World Heritage Site, which means it’s very important for nature conservation.

I would like to explore this park for several reasons. First, I’m very interested in natural wonders and I’ve never seen such big caves before. Second, I enjoy hiking and outdoor activities, and this park offers many trekking routes. Also, I think visiting this place would help me understand more about Vietnamese nature and geology. Finally, I believe spending time in such a beautiful natural environment would be very relaxing and memorable. It would be a great experience to see these natural formations that took millions of years to form.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có linking words cơ bản (First, Second, Also, Finally). Ý tưởng tương đối mạch lạc nhưng còn mechanical. Thời lượng đủ nhưng chưa đạt 2 phút đầy đủ
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng adequate với collocations như “natural wonders”, “outdoor activities”, “nature conservation”. Tuy nhiên còn lặp từ “park” nhiều lần, chưa dùng paraphrase
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Có một số cấu trúc phức như relative clause “which I really want to visit”, “which means”. Tuy nhiên chủ yếu là simple và compound sentences. Ít complex structures
Pronunciation	6-7	Giả định phát âm rõ ràng với các từ phổ biến, nhưng có thể gặp khó với “geological”, “formations”

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Cover đủ tất cả bullet points trong đề bài
• ✅ Có cấu trúc rõ ràng theo từng phần
• ✅ Đưa ra nhiều lý do tại sao muốn khám phá (First, Second, Also, Finally)
• ✅ Có thông tin factual về công viên (UNESCO, Son Doong Cave)

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Từ vựng chưa sophisticated, còn lặp từ nhiều (park xuất hiện 8 lần)
• ⚠️ Thiếu personal feeling sâu sắc – nói lý do nhưng chưa có emotion
• ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đủ variety
• ⚠️ Thiếu descriptive language để tạo imagery
• ⚠️ Chưa đủ 2 phút (khoảng 1.5 phút)

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d love to tell you about Torres del Paine National Park in Chilean Patagonia, which has been on my bucket list for quite some time now. This spectacular nature reserve is situated in the southernmost region of Chile, and it’s renowned as one of the most breathtaking wilderness areas in South America.

My fascination with this park began when I stumbled upon a stunning photo essay in National Geographic magazine about three years ago. The images of jagged mountain peaks, turquoise glacial lakes, and vast open steppes were absolutely mesmerizing. Since then, I’ve been actively following travel blogs and watching documentaries about the park, which has only intensified my desire to visit.

What sets Torres del Paine apart is its incredible biodiversity and dramatic landscapes. The park is home to the famous granite towers that give it its name, as well as massive glaciers that are part of the Southern Patagonian Ice Field. The wildlife is equally impressive – you can spot guanacos, which are relatives of llamas, Andean condors soaring overhead, and if you’re lucky, even the elusive puma. The park also offers some of the world’s most challenging yet rewarding hiking circuits, including the famous W Trek.

There are several compelling reasons why I’m eager to explore this particular park. Firstly, as someone who’s passionate about landscape photography, I’m drawn to the ever-changing light and dramatic scenery that Patagonia is famous for. The thought of capturing sunrise over those iconic granite towers is incredibly exciting. Secondly, I’ve always been fascinated by extreme environments, and Patagonia’s harsh but beautiful climate represents a real adventure. Moreover, I believe that experiencing such a remote and pristine wilderness would give me a profound sense of perspective on our planet’s natural heritage. In our increasingly urbanized world, places like Torres del Paine remind us of nature’s raw power and beauty, and I think that immersing myself in such an environment would be not just memorable but also transformative for my appreciation of the natural world.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Flow tự nhiên với discourse markers sophisticated (Firstly, Secondly, Moreover). Ý tưởng phát triển logic và coherent. Đủ 2+ phút
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range of vocabulary với collocations tự nhiên: “on my bucket list”, “stumbled upon”, “sets apart”, “ever-changing light”. Paraphrasing tốt (nature reserve, wilderness area, park)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Variety of complex structures: relative clauses, conditionals (if you’re lucky), gerunds. Mix của simple và complex sentences tự nhiên
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Giả định pronunciation rõ ràng với từ vựng phức tạp như “biodiversity”, “Patagonia”, word stress chính xác

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“natural wonders”, “beautiful forests”	“breathtaking wilderness areas”, “dramatic landscapes”, “pristine wilderness”
Grammar	“I learned about this park from a documentary”	“My fascination began when I stumbled upon a stunning photo essay”
Ideas	“I think visiting would be relaxing and memorable”	“Immersing myself in such an environment would be transformative for my appreciation of the natural world”
Description	“The park has large caves and thick forests”	“Jagged mountain peaks, turquoise glacial lakes, and vast open steppes”

Điểm mạnh bổ sung:

• ✅ Descriptive language tạo vivid imagery (jagged peaks, turquoise lakes)
• ✅ Personal passion được thể hiện rõ (landscape photography, fascination with extreme environments)
• ✅ Deep reflection về ý nghĩa (profound sense of perspective, transformative)
• ✅ Specific examples (W Trek, guanacos, Andean condors, puma)

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d be delighted to share with you my aspiration to explore the Serengeti National Park in Tanzania, which has been capturing my imagination for the better part of a decade now. This iconic African savanna is located in the northern circuit of Tanzania, bordering Kenya’s Maasai Mara, and it stands as one of the most ecologically significant wilderness areas on the planet.

My introduction to the Serengeti came through what I can only describe as a life-changing experience – watching the BBC’s groundbreaking documentary series “Planet Earth” during my university years. The breathtaking footage of the Great Migration, where millions of wildebeest, zebras, and gazelles undertake their perilous annual journey across the plains, left me absolutely spellbound. Since then, I’ve been voraciously consuming everything I can find about the park – from academic journals on savanna ecosystems to first-hand accounts from wildlife photographers and conservationists. What really solidified my determination to visit was reading a compelling article about the park’s role in biodiversity conservation and how it serves as a living laboratory for understanding predator-prey dynamics.

What makes the Serengeti truly extraordinary – and I use that word deliberately – is its unparalleled ecological complexity and pristine wilderness character. The park encompasses over 14,750 square kilometers of diverse habitats, ranging from vast grassland plains to riverine forests and rocky outcrops known as kopjes. It boasts the highest concentration of large mammals anywhere on Earth, including the Big Five – lions, elephants, buffalo, leopards, and rhinos. But what genuinely sets it apart is the Great Migration, often described as the “greatest wildlife spectacle on Earth.” This cyclical movement of over 1.5 million animals, driven by ancient instincts and rainfall patterns, is a testament to nature’s rhythms that have remained unchanged for millennia. The park is also a UNESCO World Heritage Site, recognized not just for its wildlife but for its role in advancing our understanding of ecological processes and species evolution.

Now, as for why I’m so passionately drawn to exploring this particular wilderness, there are several deeply personal and interconnected reasons. First and foremost, as someone who studied environmental science, I’m intellectually fascinated by the intricate web of relationships that sustain such a biodiverse ecosystem. The Serengeti represents what ecologists call a complete ecosystem – one where natural processes operate with minimal human interference. I’m particularly interested in observing the delicate balance between predator and prey populations and understanding how seasonal variations drive animal behavior.

Beyond the scientific dimension, there’s something profoundly humbling about the prospect of witnessing wildlife in a landscape that has remained essentially unchanged since the dawn of humanity. In our increasingly fragmented and anthropocentric world, the Serengeti offers a rare glimpse into how nature functions when left to its own devices. I believe that experiencing this untamed wilderness would provide me with a renewed sense of perspective on humanity’s place within the broader ecological tapestry. There’s also an aesthetic element I can’t ignore – as an amateur photographer, the opportunity to capture the ethereal beauty of the African sunset over the plains, or the raw intensity of a lion hunt, represents a creative challenge I’ve been yearning for.

Moreover, I’m increasingly aware that places like the Serengeti face mounting pressures from climate change, human encroachment, and poaching. Visiting the park would not only fulfill a personal dream but also deepen my commitment to conservation efforts. I believe that experiencing such awe-inspiring nature firsthand is crucial for developing the emotional connection necessary to become an effective advocate for environmental protection. In essence, exploring the Serengeti would be much more than a mere holiday – it would be a transformative journey that would fundamentally reshape my understanding of our natural world and my responsibility toward its preservation.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Exceptionally fluent với natural discourse markers (Now as for, First and foremost, Beyond, Moreover). Ý tưởng được phát triển đầy đủ, sophisticated và coherent. Transitions hoàn hảo giữa các phần
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Wide và flexible lexical range với idiomatic usage tự nhiên: “capturing my imagination”, “voraciously consuming”, “spellbound”. Precise vocabulary cho academic concepts (predator-prey dynamics, ecological tapestry, anthropocentric)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range của structures: complex relative clauses, participial phrases, conditional forms, passive voice. Error-free với natural English patterns
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Giả định native-like pronunciation với word stress và intonation patterns chính xác ngay cả với academic terminology

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:

• Discourse markers rất tự nhiên và sophisticated: “I’d be delighted to”, “for the better part of a decade”, “what I can only describe as”
• Không có hesitation, flow như native speaker
• Self-correction tinh tế: “What makes it extraordinary – and I use that word deliberately”

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• Academic collocations: “ecologically significant”, “predator-prey dynamics”, “biodiversity conservation”
• Vivid descriptive language: “perilous annual journey”, “ethereal beauty”, “raw intensity”
• Idiomatic expressions sử dụng tự nhiên: “voraciously consuming”, “solidified my determination”
• Paraphrasing xuất sắc: park → wilderness area → savanna → ecosystem → protected area

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Reduced relative clauses: “ranging from vast grassland plains to…”
• Participial phrases: “driven by ancient instincts and rainfall patterns”
• Cleft sentences: “What really solidified my determination was…”
• Passive voice academic: “is recognized not just for…”
• Complex conditionals được implied subtly

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:

• Multi-layered reasoning: scientific interest → personal growth → aesthetic appeal → conservation awareness
• Demonstrates critical thinking: nhận thức về threats, connection giữa experience và advocacy
• Personal reflection đầy emotion nhưng vẫn sophisticated: “profoundly humbling”, “transformative journey”
• Shows breadth of knowledge: ecological concepts, conservation issues, historical context

🎨 Structure Hoàn Hảo:

• Introduction hook engaging: “capturing my imagination for the better part of a decade”
• Mỗi bullet point được develop chi tiết với examples
• “Explain why” chiếm 50% câu trả lời với multi-dimensional reasons
• Conclusion strong với broader implication về conservation

Cảnh đại di cư động vật hoang dã tại vườn quốc gia Serengeti với hàng nghìn ngựa vằn và linh dương di chuyển trên thảo nguyên rộng lớn

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Sau khi bạn nói xong 2 phút Part 2, examiner thường hỏi 1-2 câu ngắn liên quan trực tiếp đến topic vừa nói. Đây là transition sang Part 3.

Question 1: Have you made any plans to visit this park?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Not yet, but I’m planning to go there in the next few years. I need to save money first because it’s quite expensive to travel there. I’m also researching the best time to visit.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Well, I’ve been putting together a tentative plan actually. I’m hoping to visit within the next two years, though it depends on logistical factors like work commitments and finances. I’ve been setting aside a travel fund specifically for this trip, and I’m currently researching the optimal season to visit – probably during the dry season when wildlife viewing is at its peak. It’s definitely moved from wishful thinking to a concrete goal.

Phân tích:

• Band 8-9 shows more planning detail với “tentative plan”, “setting aside”
• Natural discourse marker “actually” và “Well”
• Idiomatic expressions: “wishful thinking”, “concrete goal”

---

Question 2: What would you do if you couldn’t visit this park?

Band 6-7 Answer:
I would be disappointed, but I could visit other nature parks instead. There are many beautiful parks in the world, so I would just choose a different destination.

Band 8-9 Answer:
That would be rather disappointing, but I suppose there are alternative wilderness areas that could offer similar experiences. I’d probably turn my attention to places like Kruger National Park in South Africa or perhaps Yellowstone in the US. That said, the Serengeti has a unique mystique that would be hard to replicate elsewhere. If it proved truly unfeasible to visit, I’d content myself with continuing to learn about it through documentaries and perhaps even contributing to conservation efforts from afar.

Phân tích:

• Shows flexibility với alternatives
• Acknowledges unique quality: “unique mystique that would be hard to replicate”
• Positive framing với “content myself”, “contributing to conservation”
• Vocabulary sophisticated: “unfeasible”, “turn my attention”

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần khó nhất và quan trọng nhất để phân biệt band 7+ với band 6. Đây là cuộc thảo luận trừu tượng về các vấn đề xã hội liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2. Examiner đánh giá khả năng critical thinking, phân tích sâu và diễn đạt ý kiến phức tạp.

Thời gian: 4-5 phút

Yêu cầu:

• Phân tích, so sánh, đưa ra nhận định có chiều sâu
• Xem xét nhiều góc độ của vấn đề (advantages/disadvantages, causes/effects)
• Đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân có lý lẽ rõ ràng
• Sử dụng examples từ society, không chỉ personal experience

Chiến lược:

• Mỗi câu trả lời nên 4-6 câu (30-45 giây)
• Sử dụng discourse markers để structure answer: “Well, I think…”, “On the one hand…”, “From my perspective…”
• Acknowledge complexity: “It’s a complex issue”, “There are multiple factors”
• Balance view khi phù hợp: “While…there are also…”

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn (1-2 câu)
• Chỉ đưa ra một góc nhìn duy nhất
• Không có examples từ society/world
• Thiếu vocabulary trừu tượng (development, sustainability, urbanization…)
• Không dare to có opinion mạnh mẽ

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Environmental Conservation

---

Question 1: Why do you think it’s important to protect natural parks and wilderness areas?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Reason (Why important)
• Key words: protect, natural parks, wilderness, important
• Cách tiếp cận: Direct answer về tầm quan trọng → Multiple reasons (environmental, scientific, social) → Broader implication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think protecting natural parks is very important for several reasons. First, these areas are home to many rare animals and plants that need protection. If we don’t protect them, some species might disappear. Second, natural parks help keep the air clean and control the climate. They also provide places where people can enjoy nature and relax. In my country, Vietnam, we have many national parks like Cat Ba and Phong Nha, and they are important for both wildlife and tourism.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear với First, Second nhưng còn mechanical
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng basic (rare animals, keep air clean, enjoy nature)
• Ideas: Cover main points (biodiversity, environment, recreation) nhưng chưa deep
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đủ thông tin và organized nhưng thiếu sophistication trong vocabulary và depth trong analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Well, I believe the protection of wilderness areas and natural reserves is absolutely paramount for a multitude of reasons, though I’ll focus on what I consider the most critical ones.

From an ecological standpoint, these areas serve as crucial biodiversity hotspots that harbor species found nowhere else on Earth. Many of these organisms play vital roles in their ecosystems – for instance, apex predators help regulate prey populations, while certain plants may hold the key to future medical breakthroughs. Without protected status, these areas face threats from habitat fragmentation, poaching, and unsustainable development, which could lead to irreversible biodiversity loss.

Beyond the environmental dimension, there’s also a compelling scientific rationale. Natural parks function as living laboratories where researchers can study ecosystem dynamics and evolutionary processes in their unaltered state. This research is invaluable for understanding how natural systems respond to environmental pressures, which in turn helps us develop more effective conservation strategies.

On a more human level, I’d argue that these wild spaces serve an intrinsic psychological purpose. In our increasingly urbanized world, pristine natural environments offer people an opportunity to reconnect with nature and gain perspective on their place in the larger ecosystem. There’s growing evidence that exposure to nature has significant mental health benefits, from reducing stress levels to enhancing creativity.

So in essence, protecting these areas isn’t just about preserving pretty landscapes – it’s about safeguarding the ecological infrastructure that supports all life on Earth, advancing scientific knowledge, and maintaining spaces that nourish the human spirit.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptional với clear signposting: “From an ecological standpoint”, “Beyond the environmental dimension”, “On a more human level”, “So in essence”
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated và precise: “paramount”, “biodiversity hotspots”, “apex predators”, “habitat fragmentation”, “irreversible biodiversity loss”, “intrinsic psychological purpose”
• Grammar: Complex structures tự nhiên: participial phrases “which in turn helps us”, relative clauses “where researchers can study”, cleft sentences “it’s about safeguarding”
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis (ecological, scientific, psychological), shows awareness of nuance, backs up với scientific evidence “growing evidence that…”

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Well”, “From…standpoint”, “Beyond”, “On a more…level”, “So in essence”
• Tentative language: “I believe”, “I’d argue”, “I consider” – shows critical thinking không assertive quá
• Abstract nouns: biodiversity, fragmentation, urbanization, infrastructure – academic register
• Hedging: “Many of these”, “certain plants may” – academic caution

---

Question 2: Do you think governments are doing enough to protect natural environments?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Evaluation (are…doing enough)
• Key words: governments, doing enough, protect natural environments
• Cách tiếp cận: Give position (Yes/No/Mixed) → Evidence/Examples → Acknowledge other side → Conclusion/Recommendation

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think most governments are trying to protect nature, but it’s not always enough. Many countries have created national parks and passed environmental laws, which is good. However, there are still problems like illegal hunting and deforestation. The government needs to enforce the laws better and spend more money on conservation. In some cases, economic development is more important to governments than environmental protection, which is a problem.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Has position và reasons, nhưng development còn simple
• Vocabulary: Adequate (national parks, environmental laws, conservation) nhưng general
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear answer với some support nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated examples

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

That’s quite a nuanced question, and I’d say the answer really varies considerably depending on which government we’re talking about. Overall, though, I think it’s fair to say that while progress has been made, most governments still fall short of what’s genuinely needed to address the scale of environmental challenges we’re facing.

On the positive side, many nations have indeed established protected areas and enacted legislation aimed at conservation. Countries like Costa Rica, for example, have made remarkable strides in protecting their natural heritage, with nearly 25% of their territory designated as protected areas. Similarly, international agreements like the Paris Climate Accord show growing political will to address environmental issues on a global scale.

That said, there’s often a significant gap between policy on paper and actual implementation. Many governments face competing priorities – particularly in developing nations where there’s intense pressure to pursue economic growth at almost any cost. Budget constraints, corruption, and inadequate enforcement mechanisms often undermine even well-intentioned policies. For instance, we continue to see rampant deforestation in the Amazon despite Brazil having relatively strong environmental legislation.

Moreover, I think many governments are still taking an overly reactive approach rather than a proactive one. They tend to respond to environmental crises after they’ve occurred rather than investing in prevention. What’s really needed is a fundamental shift in how we view economic development – moving away from the extractive model toward sustainable practices that recognize the intrinsic value of natural ecosystems.

In my view, governments need to not only strengthen enforcement but also allocate substantially more resources to conservation and create economic incentives that make protecting nature more profitable than destroying it.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated với balanced argument: acknowledges progress → identifies shortcomings → explains systemic issues → proposes solutions
• Vocabulary: Precise và topic-specific: “nuanced question”, “fall short”, “enacted legislation”, “competing priorities”, “enforcement mechanisms”, “rampant deforestation”, “extractive model”
• Grammar: Wide range: conditional forms, passive voice, relative clauses, participle clauses tự nhiên
• Critical Thinking: Shows depth với:
  • Acknowledges complexity: “varies considerably”, “nuanced”
  • Gives specific examples: Costa Rica, Paris Accord, Amazon
  • Identifies systemic problems: budget constraints, corruption
  • Proposes solutions: fundamental shift, economic incentives
  • Balanced view: recognizes both progress và shortcomings

💡 Key Language Features:

• Evaluative language: “fall short”, “significant gap”, “overly reactive”, “well-intentioned”
• Contrast markers: “On the positive side”, “That said”, “Moreover”
• Hedging for academic tone: “I’d say”, “I think it’s fair to say”, “In my view”
• Citing examples effectively: “Countries like Costa Rica, for example”

Biểu đồ minh họa chính sách bảo vệ môi trường và khu bảo tồn thiên nhiên của các quốc gia trên thế giới

---

Theme 2: Tourism and Nature

Question 3: What are the positive and negative effects of tourism on natural parks?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare (Advantages & Disadvantages)
• Key words: positive, negative effects, tourism, natural parks
• Cách tiếp cận: Structure theo 2 sides → Give balanced view → Conclude với personal stance về which matters more

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Tourism has both good and bad effects on natural parks. On the positive side, tourism brings money that can be used to protect the parks and help local communities. It also creates jobs for people living near the parks. Many parks depend on tourism income for their maintenance.

However, there are also negative effects. Too many tourists can damage the environment. They might leave trash, disturb animals, or walk on protected plants. Some tourist activities like hiking can cause erosion. During peak season, popular parks become very crowded, which affects the natural beauty and wildlife.

I think tourism can be good if it’s managed properly. Parks need to control visitor numbers and educate tourists about protecting nature.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear với positive side và negative side
• Vocabulary: Adequate (brings money, creates jobs, damage environment) nhưng general
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Balanced view với examples nhưng analysis chưa deep, vocabulary chưa sophisticated

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

This is actually a double-edged sword, and I think it’s important to acknowledge both dimensions of tourism’s impact on natural areas.

Starting with the benefits, tourism can be a powerful economic driver for conservation efforts. When natural parks generate revenue through entrance fees, guided tours, and related services, this creates a tangible financial incentive for governments and local communities to protect these areas. We’ve seen this work particularly well in countries like Rwanda, where gorilla tourism has not only funded conservation programs but also transformed local attitudes toward wildlife protection. Tourism also raises awareness on a global scale – when people experience the majesty of these places firsthand, they’re more likely to become advocates for environmental protection. Furthermore, it can provide alternative livelihoods for local populations who might otherwise depend on environmentally destructive activities like logging or poaching.

However, the flip side of this is quite concerning. Unchecked tourism can lead to what ecologists call “loving nature to death”. High visitor volumes create infrastructure pressure – more roads, hotels, and facilities, which fragment habitats and disrupt wildlife patterns. There’s also the issue of behavioral impact: tourists, even well-meaning ones, can inadvertently cause harm through activities like getting too close to wildlife, straying off designated paths, or introducing invasive species. Popular destinations like Machu Picchu or certain Thai islands have experienced severe environmental degradation due to overtourism. Additionally, the carbon footprint associated with travel to these remote locations contributes to the very climate change that threatens these ecosystems.

In my opinion, the key lies in what’s now being called “sustainable tourism” or “ecotourism” – carefully managed visitor experiences that minimize environmental impact while maximizing conservation benefits. This might involve implementing visitor quotas, enforcing strict behavioral guidelines, investing tourism revenue directly into conservation, and empowering local communities to be stewards of their natural resources. Countries like Bhutan, with their “high value, low impact” tourism model, show that it’s possible to strike this balance.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptional organization: benefits → drawbacks → balanced solution. Clear discourse markers throughout
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated và precise:
  • Idiomatic: “double-edged sword”, “loving nature to death”
  • Academic: “tangible financial incentive”, “habitat fragmentation”, “environmental degradation”, “carbon footprint”
  • Topic-specific: “ecotourism”, “visitor quotas”, “stewards”, “high value, low impact”
• Grammar: Complex structures flow naturally:
  • Conditional: “When natural parks generate revenue”
  • Relative clauses: “who might otherwise depend on”
  • Participial phrases: “even well-meaning ones”
  • Passive: “is now being called”
• Critical Thinking: Outstanding depth:
  • Specific examples: Rwanda gorillas, Machu Picchu, Thai islands, Bhutan
  • Acknowledges complexity: “inadvertently cause harm”
  • Proposes nuanced solution: sustainable tourism model
  • Shows awareness of systemic issues: carbon footprint paradox

💡 Key Language Features:

• Signposting: “Starting with”, “However, the flip side”, “Additionally”, “In my opinion”
• Academic caution: “can be”, “might involve”, “it’s possible to”
• Introducing counterarguments: “However”, “the flip side of this”
• Technical terms used naturally: habitat fragmentation, invasive species, carbon footprint

---

Question 4: How can people be encouraged to visit nature parks rather than cities for holidays?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Problem-Solution / Suggestions (How can people be encouraged)
• Key words: encouraged, visit nature parks, rather than cities, holidays
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge current trend → Identify barriers → Suggest multiple solutions → Conclude về feasibility

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

To encourage more people to visit nature parks, I think there are several things we can do. First, nature parks should be made more accessible by improving transportation. Many parks are in remote areas, so better roads and public transport would help.

Second, we could reduce the cost of visiting. Entry fees and accommodation near parks are sometimes expensive, which discourages families. If prices were lower, more people would visit.

Marketing is also important. Parks should use social media to promote their attractions and show people why visiting nature is better than staying in cities. They could show beautiful photos and videos of wildlife and landscapes.

Finally, schools could organize field trips to nature parks to introduce children to outdoor activities from a young age.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Multiple solutions với First, Second, Finally
• Vocabulary: Clear (accessible, reduce cost, marketing) nhưng straightforward
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Practical suggestions với some development nhưng lacks sophisticated analysis of psychological/social factors

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

That’s an interesting challenge, especially given that urban tourism currently dominates the travel industry. I think shifting preferences toward nature-based holidays requires a multi-faceted approach that addresses both practical barriers and psychological factors.

First and foremost, we need to tackle the perception problem. Many people, particularly younger generations, associate nature parks with rustic and uncomfortable experiences. There’s often a misconception that visiting wilderness areas means sacrificing comfort and modern amenities. To counter this, destinations could develop “glamping” facilities – that’s glamorous camping – which bridge the gap between outdoor adventure and comfort. We’re seeing this trend gain traction in places like New Zealand and Scandinavia, where you can experience stunning natural settings without giving up creature comforts.

Secondly, accessibility is crucial. Unlike cities which typically have well-developed infrastructure, many natural parks are notoriously difficult to reach, especially for families or elderly visitors. Governments and park authorities should invest in improving transportation links – perhaps subsidizing bus routes or creating park-and-ride systems. Some countries have implemented “national park passes” that offer unlimited access for a reasonable annual fee, which incentivizes repeat visits.

From a marketing perspective, I believe there’s enormous untapped potential in highlighting the wellness benefits of nature. Mounting scientific evidence shows that spending time in natural environments reduces stress, improves mental health, and even boosts immune function. Park authorities could partner with health organizations to promote nature visits as a form of preventive healthcare. The Japanese concept of “forest bathing” or shinrin-yoku has been remarkably successful in framing nature visits as a health-promoting activity rather than just leisure.

Additionally, education plays a pivotal role. If we want to cultivate a genuine appreciation for nature, we need to start young. Schools should incorporate more outdoor education programs and field trips to natural areas. When children develop an emotional connection to nature early in life, they’re far more likely to prioritize these experiences as adults.

Finally, I think we need to leverage digital technology paradoxically to promote offline experiences. Virtual reality previews, engaging social media content, and well-designed apps that enhance the park experience – like interactive nature guides or augmented reality features – can make nature parks feel more relevant to tech-savvy generations.

Ultimately, it’s about reframing the narrative around nature tourism – positioning it not as an alternative to city breaks but as an essential component of a balanced lifestyle and a meaningful way to disconnect from our hyper-connected world.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated với 5 distinct approaches, each well-developed. Natural progression từ perception → practical → marketing → education → technology
• Vocabulary: Exceptional range:
  • Colloquial yet appropriate: “creature comforts”, “untapped potential”
  • Academic: “multi-faceted approach”, “perception problem”, “cultivate”
  • Topic-specific: “glamping”, “forest bathing/shinrin-yoku”, “park-and-ride”
  • Abstract: “reframing the narrative”, “positioning”, “hyper-connected”
• Grammar: Full range showcased naturally:
  • Relative clauses: “which bridge the gap”, “that offer unlimited access”
  • Conditionals: “If we want to cultivate”
  • Passive voice: “is currently dominated”, “are notoriously difficult”
  • Comparative structures: “far more likely”, “not as an alternative to but as”
• Critical Thinking: Outstanding với:
  • Identifies root causes: perception problem, practical barriers
  • Specific examples: New Zealand glamping, Japanese shinrin-yoku, national park passes
  • Shows awareness of different demographics: younger generations, families, elderly
  • Acknowledges irony: “leverage digital technology…to promote offline experiences”
  • Holistic conclusion: reframing narrative

💡 Key Language Features:

• Sophisticated discourse markers: “First and foremost”, “Secondly”, “From a…perspective”, “Additionally”, “Finally”, “Ultimately”
• Hedging and cautious language: “I think”, “I believe”, “could develop”, “perhaps”
• Introducing evidence: “Mounting scientific evidence shows”, “We’re seeing this trend”
• Emphasis techniques: “enormous untapped potential”, “remarkably successful”
• Parenthetical explanations: “that’s glamorous camping”, “or shinrin-yoku”

Khu cắm trại sang trọng glamping với lều trại hiện đại trong công viên thiên nhiên, kết hợp giữa tiện nghi và trải nghiệm thiên nhiên

---

Theme 3: Urban vs Natural Environments

Question 5: Why do you think some people prefer cities to natural environments?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Analyze reasons/causes (Why do some people prefer)
• Key words: prefer cities, natural environments, reasons
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge different preferences → Explore multiple reasons (practical, psychological, cultural) → Fair conclusion không judge

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think different people have different preferences. Some people prefer cities because cities are more convenient. They have everything close by – shops, restaurants, hospitals, and entertainment. In cities, you don’t need a car because public transport is good.

Also, cities offer more job opportunities and better salaries. Young people especially like cities because they want to build their careers. Cities are more exciting with lots of activities and events happening every day.

Some people also find nature boring because there’s nothing to do. They’re used to busy city life and feel uncomfortable in quiet natural places. People who grow up in cities might not know how to enjoy nature.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear reasons: convenience, career, lifestyle
• Vocabulary: Adequate (convenient, job opportunities, exciting) nhưng general
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points với some explanation nhưng analysis superficial, vocabulary simple

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

That’s a fascinating question that really speaks to the diverse range of human preferences and value systems. I think there are several interrelated factors that drive urban preference, and it’s worth exploring them non-judgmentally.

From a purely practical standpoint, cities offer unparalleled convenience and accessibility. Everything you need is typically within reach – healthcare facilities, educational institutions, employment opportunities, and cultural amenities. For people with demanding careers or those raising families, this proximity to services can be absolutely essential. There’s also the infrastructure advantage – reliable public transportation, high-speed internet, and modern utilities that we often take for granted in urban settings but which can be woefully inadequate in remote natural areas.

Beyond practicalities, I think there’s a strong social dimension to urban preference. Cities are hubs of human interaction and cultural diversity. For many people, the energy and dynamism of city life – the constant buzz of activity, the serendipitous encounters, the cultural events – are deeply fulfilling. This is particularly true for younger people who are at a life stage where socializing and building professional networks are priorities. In contrast, natural environments, while beautiful, can feel isolating for those who thrive on social stimulation.

There’s also what I’d call a “familiarity bias”. People who’ve spent their formative years in urban environments often find nature somewhat alien or even intimidating. They may lack the skills and knowledge to feel comfortable in wilderness settings – things like navigation, understanding weather patterns, or identifying potential hazards. This knowledge gap can translate into anxiety rather than enjoyment when visiting natural areas.

Moreover, I think we shouldn’t underestimate the psychological comfort of controlled environments. Cities, for all their chaos, are fundamentally human-designed spaces where most variables are predictable and manageable. Nature, by contrast, is inherently unpredictable – weather can change suddenly, you might encounter wildlife, mobile phone coverage is unreliable. For people who value predictability and control, this unpredictability can be unsettling rather than exhilarating.

Finally, there may be cultural factors at play. In many rapidly developing nations, urbanization is associated with progress, modernity, and upward mobility. There can be a societal perception that rural or natural areas represent backwardness or lack of opportunity. This stigma, though unfortunate, shapes preferences at a deep level.

That said, I don’t think these preferences are fixed. Many people who prefer cities simply haven’t had positive experiences in nature yet, or haven’t discovered activities that resonate with them. The key is respecting different preferences while also creating opportunities for people to explore what natural environments have to offer.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally organized với 5 distinct dimensions: practical, social, psychological, cultural. Mỗi point được develop đầy đủ với nuance
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và varied:
  • Academic register: “interrelated factors”, “non-judgmentally”, “proximity to services”, “formative years”
  • Psychological terms: “familiarity bias”, “psychological comfort”, “predictability”
  • Social commentary: “upward mobility”, “societal perception”, “stigma”
  • Vivid descriptions: “constant buzz”, “serendipitous encounters”, “woefully inadequate”
• Grammar: Full mastery với complex structures:
  • Cleft sentences: “it’s worth exploring”, “There’s also what I’d call”
  • Relative clauses embedded naturally throughout
  • Conditionals: implied trong “can be unsettling rather than exhilarating”
  • Parallel structures: “predictable and manageable”, “unsettling rather than exhilarating”
• Critical Thinking: Outstanding depth:
  • Non-judgmental analysis: “non-judgmentally”, “worth respecting”
  • Multiple perspectives: practical, social, psychological, cultural
  • Acknowledges complexity: “interrelated factors”, “diverse range”
  • Nuanced conclusion: preferences aren’t fixed, importance of creating opportunities
  • Shows empathy: understands different viewpoints without dismissing them

💡 Key Language Features:

• Academic hedging: “I think”, “may be”, “can feel”, “often find”
• Introducing perspectives: “From a…standpoint”, “Beyond practicalities”, “There’s also”
• Contrast markers: “while beautiful”, “by contrast”, “rather than”
• Emphasis: “absolutely essential”, “deeply fulfilling”, “inherently unpredictable”
• Creating new concepts: “what I’d call a ‘familiarity bias'” – shows sophisticated thinking

---

Question 6: Do you think future generations will value nature more or less than we do now?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Prediction/Speculation (future trends)
• Key words: future generations, value nature, more or less
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge uncertainty → Present both possibilities (optimistic and pessimistic scenarios) → Give personal prediction với reasons

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

That’s difficult to predict, but I think it could go either way. On one hand, young people today are more aware of environmental problems like climate change and pollution. They learn about these issues in school and see news about them online, so they might care more about protecting nature.

On the other hand, future generations will grow up with more technology and spend more time indoors using devices. They might have less contact with nature and therefore appreciate it less. Also, as cities continue to grow, fewer people will live near natural areas.

I hope that education will help young people value nature more, but it’s hard to say for certain.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Balanced với “on one hand” và “on the other hand”
• Vocabulary: Adequate (environmental problems, protecting nature) nhưng general
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers both sides với some reasoning nhưng lacks sophisticated analysis of trends and factors

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

That’s quite a thought-provoking question, and honestly, I think the answer is far from certain – there are compelling arguments on both sides, and the reality will likely be more nuanced than a simple “more” or “less.”

On the optimistic side, there are reasons to believe future generations might develop a deeper appreciation for nature. First, environmental awareness has never been higher, largely thanks to youth-led movements like Greta Thunberg’s climate activism. Today’s young people are growing up with an acute understanding of ecological crises – they’re witnessing extreme weather events, biodiversity loss, and ecosystem collapse in real-time through media. This constant exposure to environmental issues could translate into a heightened sense of urgency about protecting what remains. Additionally, as natural spaces become increasingly scarce, they may be valued more highly – following the economic principle of scarcity driving value. We’re already seeing this with “forest bathing” and “ecotherapy” becoming mainstream concepts.

However, there are equally troubling counter-trends that suggest the opposite. The accelerating pace of urbanization means that a growing proportion of humanity will have minimal exposure to natural environments during their formative years. There’s a concept called “shifting baseline syndrome” that’s particularly relevant here – each generation unconsciously accepts the environmental conditions they grew up with as normal, failing to recognize the degradation from previous generations. A child born today in a highly urbanized, climate-changed world might simply not comprehend what’s been lost.

Moreover, the digital revolution presents a double-edged sword. While technology can raise awareness, it also creates competing demands for attention. When you can experience the world virtually – through VR simulations of rainforests or documentaries – there’s less incentive to seek out these experiences physically. Screen addiction and the gamification of life could lead to a generation that values digital experiences over physical ones, nature included.

I’d also point to the economic pressures that future generations will face. With rising living costs, student debt, and job insecurity, many young people are prioritizing economic survival over environmental values. When you’re struggling to afford housing, caring about remote wilderness areas can feel like a luxury.

My personal prediction – and I’m cautiously optimistic here – is that we’ll see a polarization. One segment of future society will be deeply committed to environmental stewardship, having internalized the urgency of the ecological crisis. But simultaneously, we’ll have another segment that’s increasingly disconnected from nature, viewing it as largely irrelevant to their tech-centric lives. The question is which group will hold more influence in shaping policy and societal values.

Ultimately, I don’t think this outcome is predetermined. It depends heavily on the choices we make now in education, urban planning, and how we integrate nature into daily life rather than treating it as something separate or optional.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Masterful organization: uncertainty acknowledgment → optimistic scenario + evidence → pessimistic scenario + evidence → personal prediction → conditional conclusion
• Vocabulary: Exceptional sophistication:
  • Academic concepts: “shifting baseline syndrome”, “scarcity driving value”, “gamification”
  • Contemporary issues: “climate activism”, “screen addiction”, “job insecurity”
  • Abstract thinking: “competing demands for attention”, “environmental stewardship”, “tech-centric lives”
  • Precise collocations: “acute understanding”, “formative years”, “cautiously optimistic”
• Grammar: Full range demonstrated fluently:
  • Future forms varied: “will develop”, “might appreciate”, “we’ll see”
  • Complex conditionals: implied trong “When you’re struggling to afford housing”
  • Participial phrases: “following the economic principle”, “having internalized”
  • Passive constructions: “are witnessing”, “will be valued”, “is predetermined”
• Critical Thinking: Exceptional depth:
  • Acknowledges complexity: “far from certain”, “more nuanced”
  • Introduces academic concepts: shifting baseline syndrome
  • Specific examples: Greta Thunberg, forest bathing, VR simulations
  • Considers multiple factors: environmental, technological, economic, psychological
  • Predicts polarization rather than uniform trend – sophisticated analysis
  • Empathetic to economic constraints: “when you’re struggling to afford housing”
  • Conditional ending: outcome depends on choices we make now

💡 Key Language Features:

• Speculation markers: “might develop”, “could translate into”, “may be valued”, “I’d predict”
• Introducing academic concepts: “There’s a concept called”, “following the principle of”
• Presenting contrasts: “On the optimistic side”, “However”, “Moreover”, “But simultaneously”
• Emphasis through vocabulary: “never been higher”, “increasingly scarce”, “deeply committed”
• Metacognitive language: “I’m cautiously optimistic”, “My personal prediction”, “Ultimately”

Thanh thiếu niên tham gia hoạt động bảo vệ môi trường và khám phá thiên nhiên với công nghệ hiện đại

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
pristine wilderness	n	/ˈprɪstiːn ˈwɪldənəs/	vùng hoang dã nguyên sơ	The park offers pristine wilderness that has remained untouched for centuries.	pristine environment, pristine nature, pristine forest
biodiversity hotspot	n	/ˌbaɪəʊdaɪˈvɜːsəti ˈhɒtspɒt/	điểm nóng đa dạng sinh học	The Amazon rainforest is considered a major biodiversity hotspot.	critical hotspot, global hotspot, recognized hotspot
ecosystem	n	/ˈiːkəʊsɪstəm/	hệ sinh thái	Coral reefs are complex ecosystems that support thousands of species.	fragile ecosystem, marine ecosystem, balanced ecosystem, ecosystem collapse
habitat fragmentation	n	/ˈhæbɪtæt ˌfræɡmenˈteɪʃn/	sự phân mảnh môi trường sống	Road construction often leads to habitat fragmentation.	cause fragmentation, prevent fragmentation, habitat loss
conservation efforts	n	/ˌkɒnsəˈveɪʃn ˈefəts/	nỗ lực bảo tồn	Conservation efforts have helped increase the panda population.	support conservation, conservation measures, conservation project
endangered species	n	/ɪnˈdeɪndʒəd ˈspiːʃiːz/	loài bị đe dọa	Many endangered species can only be found in protected areas.	critically endangered, protect endangered species, endangered wildlife
ecological balance	n	/ˌiːkəˈlɒdʒɪkl ˈbæləns/	cân bằng sinh thái	Predators play a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance.	maintain balance, disrupt balance, restore balance, delicate balance
sustainable tourism	n	/səˈsteɪnəbl ˈtʊərɪzəm/	du lịch bền vững	Sustainable tourism aims to minimize environmental impact.	promote sustainable tourism, sustainable practices, ecotourism
breathtaking scenery	n	/ˈbreθteɪkɪŋ ˈsiːnəri/	phong cảnh ngoạn mục	The national park is famous for its breathtaking scenery.	stunning scenery, spectacular scenery, dramatic scenery
untouched nature	n	/ˌʌnˈtʌtʃt ˈneɪtʃə/	thiên nhiên hoang sơ	Few places offer such untouched nature in the modern world.	pristine nature, unspoiled nature, wild nature
apex predator	n	/ˈeɪpeks ˈpredətə/	động vật săn mồi đỉnh cao	Tigers are apex predators in their ecosystem.	top predator, dominant predator, apex species
sprawling landscape	n	/ˈsprɔːlɪŋ ˈlændskeɪp/	cảnh quan rộng lớn	The park features sprawling landscapes of grasslands and forests.	vast landscape, expansive landscape, sprawling plains
geological formation	n	/ˌdʒiːəˈlɒdʒɪkl fɔːˈmeɪʃn/	cấu tạo địa chất	The canyon’s geological formations took millions of years to form.	unique formation, ancient formation, rock formation
flora and fauna	n	/ˈflɔːrə ænd ˈfɔːnə/	hệ động thực vật	The reserve protects diverse flora and fauna.	native flora and fauna, endemic flora and fauna, unique flora and fauna
nature reserve	n	/ˈneɪtʃə rɪˈzɜːv/	khu bảo tồn thiên nhiên	The nature reserve is home to several rare bird species.	protected reserve, national reserve, wildlife reserve
wilderness area	n	/ˈwɪldənəs ˈeəriə/	khu vực hoang dã	True wilderness areas are becoming increasingly rare.	remote wilderness, pristine wilderness, vast wilderness
environmental degradation	n	/ɪnˌvaɪrənˈmentl ˌdeɡrəˈdeɪʃn/	suy thoái môi trường	Tourism can lead to environmental degradation if not managed properly.	prevent degradation, severe degradation, habitat degradation
carbon footprint	n	/ˈkɑːbən ˈfʊtprɪnt/	dấu chân carbon	Air travel significantly increases your carbon footprint.	reduce carbon footprint, minimize carbon footprint, carbon emissions

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
on my bucket list	trong danh sách điều muốn làm trước khi chết	Visiting the Galapagos Islands has been on my bucket list for years.	7.5-9
off the beaten track	nơi hẻo lánh, ít người biết	I prefer destinations that are off the beaten track rather than tourist hotspots.	7.5-9
a breath of fresh air	làm sảng khoái, thay đổi tích cực	After months in the city, visiting the mountains was a real breath of fresh air.	7-8
in the middle of nowhere	ở nơi hẻo lánh	The nature park is literally in the middle of nowhere, which makes it so peaceful.	7-8
get away from it all	thoát khỏi mọi thứ, nghỉ ngơi hoàn toàn	Sometimes you just need to get away from it all and reconnect with nature.	7-8
a stone’s throw away	rất gần (ngay cạnh)	Fortunately, there’s a beautiful park just a stone’s throw away from my apartment.	7.5-8
loving nature to death	quá yêu thiên nhiên đến mức phá hủy nó	Popular parks risk loving nature to death through overtourism.	8-9
double-edged sword	con dao hai lưỡi	Tourism is a double-edged sword for national parks.	8-9
recharge one’s batteries	nạp lại năng lượng	I visit nature parks to recharge my batteries after stressful work periods.	7.5-8
at the crack of dawn	vào lúc rạng đông	We started hiking at the crack of dawn to avoid the midday heat.	7.5-8
weather permitting	nếu thời tiết cho phép	We plan to camp overnight, weather permitting.	7-8
in its natural habitat	trong môi trường sống tự nhiên	It’s incredible to see these animals in their natural habitat.	7-8
under threat	đang bị đe dọa	Many coastal ecosystems are under threat from rising sea levels.	7.5-8
strike a balance	tìm được sự cân bằng	Parks must strike a balance between conservation and public access.	8-9
take for granted	coi là đương nhiên, không trân trọng	We often take for granted the clean air that forests provide.	7.5-8
give something a wide berth	tránh xa cái gì	Visitors should give wild animals a wide berth for safety.	8-9

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ ngắn (Well, I think that’s quite an interesting question…)
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra thông tin có thể bất ngờ hoặc trái với expectation (Actually, I’ve been planning to visit that park for years…)
• 📝 To be honest,… / Honestly,… – Khi nói thẳng thắn (To be honest, I’m not a huge fan of camping…)
• 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân (I’d say that protecting nature should be a top priority…)
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Khi nói từ góc nhìn riêng (From my perspective, the government isn’t doing enough…)

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… / Moreover,… – Thêm vào đó (On top of that, the park offers excellent hiking trails…)
• 📝 What’s more,… / Furthermore,… – Hơn nữa (What’s more, visiting nature parks can improve mental health…)
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến (The park is beautiful, not to mention incredibly peaceful…)
• 📝 Another point worth mentioning is… – Một điểm khác đáng nói là (Another point worth mentioning is the biodiversity…)
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra (Beyond that, there are educational programs for children…)

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác…
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét…
• 📝 That said,… / Having said that,… – Tuy nhiên, đã nói như vậy… (Tourism brings revenue. That said, it can also cause damage…)
• 📝 To some extent,… – Ở một mức độ nào đó (To some extent, I agree with that view, but…)

Để đưa ra ví dụ:

• 📝 For instance,… / For example,… – Ví dụ
• 📝 Take… for example – Lấy… làm ví dụ (Take Costa Rica for example – they’ve done excellent conservation work…)
• 📝 A case in point is… – Một trường hợp điển hình là (A case in point is Yellowstone National Park…)
• 📝 …such as… – …như là… (Many activities such as hiking and birdwatching…)

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… / Overall,… – Tóm lại, nhìn chung
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì (At the end of the day, we all need to take responsibility…)
• 📝 In a nutshell,… – Nói tóm lại (In a nutshell, nature parks are essential for conservation…)
• 📝 To sum up,… – Tóm lại

Để thể hiện uncertainty/tentativeness (rất quan trọng cho band 8+):

• 📝 I would say… / I’d argue that… – Tôi cho rằng (không chắc chắn tuyệt đối)
• 📝 It seems to me that… – Có vẻ như với tôi
• 📝 I tend to think that… – Tôi có xu hướng nghĩ rằng
• 📝 As far as I’m concerned,… – Theo như tôi quan tâm/biết

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

• Mixed conditional (mix past và present):

  • Formula: If + past perfect, would + base verb
  • Ví dụ: “If I had visited more national parks when I was younger, I would probably have a deeper appreciation for nature now.”

• Inversion (đảo ngữ trong câu điều kiện formal):

  • Formula: Should/Were/Had + subject + verb…
  • Ví dụ: “Were governments to invest more in conservation, we would see significant improvements.” (formal thay cho “If governments invested…”)
  • Ví dụ: “Had I known about this park earlier, I would have visited years ago.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

• Non-defining relative clauses (thông tin bổ sung):

  • Formula: …, which/who/where + clause
  • Ví dụ: “Torres del Paine, which is located in Chilean Patagonia, is one of the most spectacular parks I’ve read about.”
  • Ví dụ: “My friend Sarah, who is a passionate hiker, recommended this park to me.”

• Reduced relative clauses:

  • Ví dụ: “The park, situated in northern Tanzania, covers over 14,000 square kilometers.” (thay cho “which is situated”)
  • Ví dụ: “Tourists visiting the park should follow strict guidelines.” (thay cho “who are visiting”)

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động – để formal hơn):

• Impersonal passive (very academic):

  • Formula: It is thought/believed/said/reported that…
  • Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that spending time in nature reduces stress levels.”
  • Ví dụ: “It has been reported that visitor numbers have doubled in recent years.”

• Passive with modal verbs:

  • Ví dụ: “More funding should be allocated to conservation efforts.”
  • Ví dụ: “These ecosystems must be protected for future generations.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ – để nhấn mạnh):

• What-cleft (nhấn mạnh object/action):

  • Formula: What + subject + verb + is/was…
  • Ví dụ: “What I find most appealing about nature parks is the sense of tranquility they offer.”
  • Ví dụ: “What really concerns me is the increasing commercialization of natural areas.”

• It-cleft (nhấn mạnh subject/time/place):

  • Formula: It + be + [focus] + that/who…
  • Ví dụ: “It was the breathtaking scenery that first captured my imagination.”
  • Ví dụ: “It’s the younger generation who seem most passionate about conservation.”

5. Participle Clauses (Rút gọn mệnh đề bằng V-ing/V3):

• Present participle (-ing) – cho hành động đồng thời:

  • Ví dụ: “Visiting national parks regularly, I’ve developed a deep appreciation for wildlife.”
  • Ví dụ: “Being situated in a remote location, the park remains relatively untouched.”

• Past participle (V3) – cho passive meaning:

  • Ví dụ: “Established in 1951, the park has become a UNESCO World Heritage Site.”
  • Ví dụ: “Surrounded by mountains, the lake offers spectacular views.”

6. Inversion for Emphasis:

• After negative adverbials:

  • Formula: Rarely/Seldom/Never/Not only + auxiliary + subject + verb
  • Ví dụ: “Rarely have I seen such pristine wilderness in this day and age.”
  • Ví dụ: “Not only does the park protect endangered species, but it also provides educational opportunities.”

• After “only” expressions:

  • Ví dụ: “Only by protecting these areas can we preserve biodiversity for future generations.”
  • Ví dụ: “Only when I visited the park did I truly understand its importance.”

7. Wish/If only (để express regret hoặc desire):

• Ví dụ: “I wish more people understood the importance of conservation.”
• Ví dụ: “If only governments would prioritize environmental protection over economic development.”

8. Gerund vs Infinitive (sử dụng đúng để sound natural):

• Gerund sau certain verbs/prepositions:

  • Ví dụ: “I’m passionate about protecting the environment.” (NOT “to protect”)
  • Ví dụ: “The documentary helped raise awareness by showcasing endangered species.”

• Infinitive of purpose:

  • Ví dụ: “I’d like to visit the park to experience its unique ecosystem firsthand.”
  • Ví dụ: “Conservation efforts aim to prevent species extinction.”

9. Subjunctive (formal suggestions/requirements):

• Formula: It is essential/important/crucial that + subject + base verb (không chia)
• Ví dụ: “It is essential that visitors respect wildlife boundaries.” (NOT “respects“)
• Ví dụ: “I would recommend that the government invest more in park infrastructure.” (NOT “invests“)

---

Bài viết này cung cấp một lộ trình toàn diện để chuẩn bị cho chủ đề “describe a nature park you’d like to explore” trong IELTS Speaking. Từ góc nhìn của một examiner, điều quan trọng nhất không phải là học thuộc câu trả lời mà là hiểu rõ cách structure ý tưởng, sử dụng vocabulary tự nhiên và phát triển critical thinking.

Hãy nhớ rằng, IELTS Speaking đánh giá khả năng giao tiếp thực tế của bạn, không phải khả năng recite memorized answers. Examiner được train để nhận ra câu trả lời học thuộc và sẽ trừ điểm nghiêm khắc. Thay vào đó, hãy tập trung vào việc phát triển ideas của riêng bạn, sử dụng các structures và vocabulary trong bài này như công cụ để diễn đạt thoughts một cách tự nhiên và impressive hơn.

Chúc bạn thành công trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking!