IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe A Conversation With A Stranger” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking, chủ đề về các cuộc trò chuyện với người lạ xuất hiện khá thường xuyên, đặc biệt trong Part 2 và Part 3. Đây là một topic thú vị vì nó cho phép bạn kể về trải nghiệm thực tế và thể hiện khả năng diễn đạt cảm xúc, miêu tả tình huống một cách tự nhiên. Chủ đề này đã xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong các kỳ thi IELTS từ năm 2020 đến 2024, và dự đoán sẽ tiếp tục xuất hiện trong tương lai với khả năng cao.

Qua bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được cách trả lời hiệu quả cho tất cả các câu hỏi liên quan đến chủ đề này trong cả 3 Part của bài thi Speaking. Bạn sẽ được tiếp cận với các bài mẫu chi tiết theo nhiều band điểm khác nhau từ 6-7, 7.5-8 đến 8.5-9, cùng với phân tích chuyên sâu về lý do tại sao mỗi bài đạt band điểm tương ứng. Ngoài ra, bài viết còn cung cấp kho từ vựng phong phú, các cụm từ ăn điểm và chiến lược trả lời từ góc nhìn của một examiner có kinh nghiệm. Điều quan trọng là bạn sẽ biết cách tránh những lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và xây dựng câu trả lời tự nhiên, không rập khuôn.

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 thường kéo dài từ 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về đời sống hàng ngày. Đối với chủ đề về giao tiếp với người lạ, examiner thường hỏi về thói quen, sở thích và trải nghiệm cá nhân của bạn. Chiến lược tốt nhất là trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi trong 1 câu đầu tiên, sau đó mở rộng bằng lý do hoặc ví dụ cụ thể trong 1-2 câu tiếp theo.

Các lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 1 bao gồm trả lời quá ngắn gọn chỉ với Yes hoặc No, sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản như good, bad, nice mà không có các từ đồng nghĩa phong phú hơn, và thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân khiến câu trả lời nghe chung chung.

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you often talk to strangers?

Question 2: In what situations do you usually talk to people you don’t know?

Question 3: Is it easy for you to start a conversation with someone you’ve never met?

Question 4: Do you think people in your country are friendly to strangers?

Question 5: Have you ever had a memorable conversation with someone you didn’t know?

Question 6: Do you prefer talking to strangers online or face-to-face?

Question 7: What topics do you usually discuss with people you’ve just met?

Question 8: Has talking to a stranger ever helped you in some way?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you often talk to strangers?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp với tần suất (Yes/No, sometimes, occasionally)
• Đưa ra lý do hoặc bối cảnh cụ thể
• Thêm ví dụ ngắn gọn từ trải nghiệm cá nhân

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I sometimes talk to strangers, especially when I need help with directions or when I’m waiting in line. I think it’s good to be friendly with people. Last week, I talked to someone at the bus stop about the weather.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, có đưa ra ví dụ cụ thể
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (good, friendly), ý tưởng chưa được phát triển sâu, thiếu linking words
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời đủ thông tin nhưng vocabulary và grammar structures còn basic, chưa thể hiện được sự sophisticated trong cách diễn đạt

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’d say I’m fairly open to chatting with strangers, particularly in casual settings like coffee shops or public transport. I find that these spontaneous interactions can be quite refreshing and sometimes even insightful. Just the other day, I had a fascinating exchange with a fellow passenger on the train who shared some valuable insights about local culture that you simply can’t find in guidebooks.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng discourse marker tự nhiên “I’d say”, từ vựng đa dạng và precise (spontaneous interactions, insightful, fascinating exchange), có ví dụ cụ thể và meaningful, grammar structure phức tạp với relative clause
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Thể hiện fluency tốt với các từ nối tự nhiên, vocabulary resource phong phú với collocations mạnh (casual settings, valuable insights), câu trúc ngữ pháp đa dạng, và ý tưởng được phát triển logic với chi tiết cụ thể

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• fairly open to: khá cởi mở, sẵn sàng
• casual settings: bối cảnh thông thường, không trang trọng
• spontaneous interactions: các tương tác tự phát, không có kế hoạch trước
• refreshing: sảng khoái, mới mẻ
• insightful: sâu sắc, có nhiều hiểu biết
• fascinating exchange: cuộc trao đổi thú vị
• valuable insights: những hiểu biết có giá trị

---

Question: In what situations do you usually talk to people you don’t know?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Liệt kê 2-3 tình huống cụ thể
• Giải thích ngắn gọn lý do tại sao giao tiếp trong các tình huống đó
• Có thể thêm cảm nhận cá nhân về việc giao tiếp trong những bối cảnh này

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I usually talk to strangers when I need something, like asking for directions or ordering food at a restaurant. Also, when I’m at social events, I might talk to new people there. It’s a good way to make friends.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Đưa ra được nhiều tình huống khác nhau, có cấu trúc câu rõ ràng
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary đơn giản (good, make friends), thiếu detail cụ thể, không có example sinh động
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate communication nhưng thiếu depth và sophistication trong cách diễn đạt

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, there are several scenarios where I find myself striking up conversations with people I’ve never met. The most common one is during professional networking events, where breaking the ice is actually expected and encouraged. I also tend to chat with strangers when I’m traveling solo – there’s something about being in a new place that makes people more approachable. Additionally, I often engage in small talk with people in waiting rooms or during flights, as it helps pass the time and can lead to surprisingly interesting discussions.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng discourse marker “Well” tự nhiên, vocabulary phong phú và idiomatic (striking up conversations, breaking the ice, traveling solo), structure rõ ràng với “several scenarios” và “additionally”, có nhiều examples cụ thể
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency cao với flow tự nhiên, lexical resource đa dạng với nhiều collocations và phrasal verbs, grammar varied với complex sentences, ideas well-developed với multiple contexts

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• striking up conversations: bắt đầu cuộc trò chuyện
• professional networking events: sự kiện giao lưu nghề nghiệp
• breaking the ice: phá vỡ sự im lặng, làm tan băng không khí
• traveling solo: đi du lịch một mình
• approachable: dễ gần, dễ tiếp cận
• engage in small talk: tham gia vào những cuộc trò chuyện phiếm
• pass the time: giết thời gian
• lead to surprisingly interesting discussions: dẫn đến những cuộc thảo luận thú vị bất ngờ

---

Question: Is it easy for you to start a conversation with someone you’ve never met?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đánh giá khả năng của bản thân một cách trung thực
• Giải thích factors ảnh hưởng đến khả năng này
• Có thể đề cập đến sự thay đổi qua thời gian hoặc phụ thuộc vào hoàn cảnh

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“It depends on the situation. Sometimes I feel confident to talk to new people, but other times I feel shy. When I’m in a good mood, it’s easier for me. I think my English level also affects this.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Thành thực, đề cập được nhiều factors
• Hạn chế: Các ideas chưa được elaborate đầy đủ, từ vựng basic (good mood, shy, affects), thiếu examples
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Basic communication với simple vocabulary và structures

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“To be honest, my comfort level varies depending on the context. In professional settings, I’m quite confident and can effortlessly initiate conversations, partly because there are usually clear common grounds to start from. However, in more casual or social environments, I sometimes need a moment to gauge the situation before jumping in. Over the years, I’ve definitely become more adept at reading social cues and finding natural conversation starters, which has made the whole process much less daunting. I think it’s also about reciprocal energy – when the other person seems open and friendly, it’s much easier to establish rapport.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Honest và nuanced response, sử dụng tentative language phù hợp (To be honest, sometimes, quite), vocabulary sophisticated (effortlessly initiate, gauge the situation, adept at, daunting, reciprocal energy, establish rapport), đề cập đến personal development over time, complex grammar với conditional và time expressions
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Shows critical thinking về factors affecting ability, flexible và natural expression, wide range of vocabulary với precise meanings, complex sentence structures, demonstrates reflection và self-awareness

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• comfort level: mức độ thoải mái
• professional settings: môi trường chuyên nghiệp
• effortlessly initiate conversations: bắt đầu cuộc trò chuyện một cách dễ dàng
• common grounds: điểm chung
• gauge the situation: đánh giá tình huống
• adept at reading social cues: thành thạo trong việc đọc các tín hiệu xã hội
• natural conversation starters: cách mở đầu cuộc trò chuyện tự nhiên
• daunting: đáng sợ, gây nản lòng
• reciprocal energy: năng lượng đáp lại
• establish rapport: thiết lập mối quan hệ tốt

Học viên đang luyện tập IELTS Speaking Part 1 về chủ đề trò chuyện với người lạ

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi chú. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để thể hiện khả năng nói liên tục và có tổ chức. Với chủ đề về cuộc trò chuyện với người lạ để lại ấn tượng tích cực, bạn cần chuẩn bị một câu chuyện có thật hoặc hợp lý với đầy đủ chi tiết về người, thời gian, địa điểm và đặc biệt là cảm xúc cá nhân.

Chiến lược quan trọng là sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi chú các từ khóa chính cho mỗi bullet point, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh. Bạn cần nói đủ 2 phút, tối thiểu 1.5 phút để tránh bị mất điểm. Nhớ trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trong đề bài và đặc biệt chú ý đến câu hỏi “explain” cuối cùng vì đây là phần ghi điểm cao. Vì đây là câu chuyện trong quá khứ, bạn cần sử dụng chủ yếu thì quá khứ.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam là không tận dụng hết thời gian chuẩn bị, nói quá ngắn dưới 1.5 phút, bỏ sót một số bullet points hoặc phần explain quan trọng. Một số bạn cũng hay kể câu chuyện quá chung chung thiếu details cụ thể làm bài nói kém thuyết phục.

Cue Card

Describe A Conversation With A Stranger That Left A Positive Impression

You should say:

• Who this person was
• When and where the conversation took place
• What you talked about
• And explain why this conversation left a positive impression on you

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an experience/event – kể về một trải nghiệm cụ thể trong quá khứ

Thì động từ: Chủ yếu là quá khứ đơn và quá khứ tiếp diễn để kể chuyện, có thể dùng hiện tại hoàn thành khi nói về impact đến hiện tại

Bullet points phải cover:

• Who: Miêu tả người lạ đó – appearance, age, impression đầu tiên
• When and where: Bối cảnh cụ thể – thời gian, địa điểm, hoàn cảnh gặp gỡ
• What you talked about: Nội dung cuộc trò chuyện – topics, flow of conversation
• Explain why: Phần quan trọng nhất – feelings, impact, lessons learned

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là phần giúp bạn ghi điểm cao nhất vì nó thể hiện khả năng phân tích, diễn đạt cảm xúc và suy nghĩ sâu sắc. Bạn cần giải thích rõ tại sao cuộc trò chuyện đó đặc biệt, ảnh hưởng như thế nào đến bạn và có thể là bài học hay insight gì mà bạn thu được.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

“I’d like to talk about a conversation I had with a stranger about six months ago at a coffee shop near my university. This person was a middle-aged man, probably in his fifties, who was sitting at the next table.

I was studying for my exams and feeling quite stressed. He noticed my textbooks and asked me what I was studying. At first, I was a bit surprised because I don’t usually talk to strangers, but he seemed very friendly, so I told him about my studies.

We talked for about twenty minutes. He told me that he used to be a teacher and gave me some good advice about studying and managing stress. He said that I should take regular breaks and not worry too much about exams. He also shared some stories about his own university days, which were quite interesting.

This conversation left a positive impression on me because it came at the right time when I really needed encouragement. His advice was helpful and made me feel less anxious about my exams. Also, he was very kind and took time to talk to someone he didn’t know. After that conversation, I felt more relaxed and motivated to study. It showed me that sometimes strangers can be very helpful and kind, and we shouldn’t be afraid to talk to them.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có flow tương đối tốt nhưng còn một số pauses, sử dụng basic linking words như “at first”, “also”, “after that”
Lexical Resource	6-7	Vocabulary adequate nhưng còn repetitive (kind xuất hiện 2 lần, talk/talked nhiều lần), thiếu variety và sophistication
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Mix của simple và complex sentences, có relative clauses nhưng còn đơn giản, tenses accurate
Pronunciation	6-7	Rõ ràng và dễ hiểu, có một số điểm nhấn tự nhiên

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points trong đề bài
• ✅ Có cấu trúc rõ ràng với introduction, body và conclusion
• ✅ Câu chuyện có thật và believable
• ✅ Grammar về cơ bản accurate với tenses phù hợp

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary còn basic và repetitive (good, kind, helpful, interesting)
• ⚠️ Thiếu descriptive details khiến câu chuyện chưa vivid
• ⚠️ Phần explain còn surface-level, chưa dig deeper vào feelings và impact
• ⚠️ Sentence structures chưa đa dạng, còn nhiều simple sentences

Tương tự như describe a time when you attended a special family event, việc kể chuyện cần nhiều chi tiết cảm xúc hơn để đạt band cao.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

“I’d like to share an experience that really stuck with me – it was a conversation I had with a complete stranger during a train journey to Da Nang about eight months ago.

The person I met was an elderly gentleman, probably in his late sixties, with silver hair and a warm, welcoming smile. He was sitting across from me in the train compartment, and what immediately caught my attention was the book he was reading – it was about Vietnamese history, which happens to be one of my interests.

The conversation kicked off quite naturally when he noticed me glancing at his book. We started discussing Vietnamese historical sites, and the conversation gradually evolved into a broader discussion about cultural preservation and modern development. What I found particularly engaging was his balanced perspective – he’d lived through several decades of change in Vietnam and could offer firsthand insights that you simply can’t get from books. We touched on various topics, from architecture to traditional crafts, and he shared some fascinating anecdotes about places he’d visited and people he’d met.

What made this conversation leave such a lasting impression was the genuine enthusiasm he showed when talking about our culture. Despite being much older and more experienced, he never talked down to me or dismissed my opinions. Instead, he encouraged me to elaborate on my thoughts and seemed genuinely interested in my generation’s perspective. His open-mindedness and respect for different viewpoints really resonated with me. Moreover, the conversation reminded me of the value of intergenerational dialogue – how much we can learn from those who’ve lived through different eras. It rekindled my interest in exploring more about Vietnamese heritage, and I actually visited some of the sites he mentioned afterwards. This encounter taught me that meaningful connections can happen anywhere, and age is no barrier to mutual understanding and respect.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Smooth flow với natural pauses, coherent với good use của discourse markers và logical progression
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range vocabulary với idiomatic expressions (stuck with me, kicked off, resonated with me), collocations tốt (lasting impression, balanced perspective)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Variety của complex structures, relative clauses, past perfect, subordinate clauses, mostly error-free
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear pronunciation với good stress và intonation patterns

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“good advice”, “interesting stories”, “kind”	“balanced perspective”, “firsthand insights”, “fascinating anecdotes”, “genuine enthusiasm”
Grammar	“He told me that he used to be a teacher” (simple past + used to)	“Despite being much older and more experienced, he never talked down to me” (present participle, phrasal verb)
Ideas	Basic explanation: “helpful”, “kind”, “made me feel better”	Deep reflection: “value of intergenerational dialogue”, “rekindled my interest”, “mutual understanding and respect”
Details	Generic: “middle-aged man”, “coffee shop”	Specific: “elderly gentleman with silver hair”, “train journey to Da Nang”, “book about Vietnamese history”

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

“I’d like to recount a serendipitous encounter that profoundly impacted my perspective on human connection – it was an impromptu conversation I had with a stranger at Hanoi’s Old Quarter approximately a year ago, during one of those sweltering summer afternoons.

The individual in question was a woman, I’d estimate in her early forties, who exuded an air of quiet confidence. What initially drew my attention was her distinctive style – she was impeccably dressed in traditional ao dai but with modern accessories, which I found intriguing. She was perusing a collection of vintage photographs at a small gallery I’d wandered into while seeking refuge from the scorching heat.

The conversation unfolded organically when we both paused to admire the same photograph – a black and white image capturing the essence of old Hanoi. We delved into a discussion about how the city had transformed over the decades. What made the conversation particularly enriching was her nuanced understanding of urban development – she turned out to be an urban planner who’d worked on several heritage preservation projects. We explored various dimensions of the topic, from the delicate balance between modernization and cultural preservation to the socioeconomic implications of rapid urbanization. She articulated ideas that I’d been grappling with but couldn’t quite put into words – particularly about how cities can honor their past while embracing the future.

What rendered this conversation so memorable and impactful was multifaceted. Firstly, there was the intellectual stimulation – she challenged some of my preconceived notions about development and encouraged me to think more critically about the trade-offs involved. Her approach was never condescending; rather, she posed thought-provoking questions that led me to re-examine my assumptions. Secondly, what truly struck a chord was her authenticity and openness. In an age where interactions are increasingly superficial and transactional, here was someone willing to engage in a substantive discussion with a complete stranger, sharing not just knowledge but also personal experiences and even vulnerabilities regarding challenges in her field.

Moreover, the conversation transcended mere information exchange – it embodied the kind of meaningful human connection that seems increasingly rare in our fast-paced, digitally-mediated world. It reinforced my belief that serendipitous encounters can be just as valuable as planned meetings, and that remaining open and receptive to unexpected interactions can lead to profound insights. Since that conversation, I’ve become more deliberate about creating space for spontaneous interactions in my daily life, and I’ve noticed how these brief yet meaningful exchanges can enrich one’s understanding of the world. This experience essentially epitomized the beauty of human connection – how two strangers can meet by chance and, through genuine curiosity and mutual respect, create a moment that lingers long after the conversation ends.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Speaks fluently với minimal hesitation, coherent với sophisticated linking, logical flow với clear progression of ideas
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Wide và sophisticated vocabulary range, precise usage, idiomatic và colloquial language, skillful use of less common items
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range of structures với flexibility, consistent accuracy, complex structures used naturally
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Clear pronunciation throughout, effective use of stress và intonation, easy to understand

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói flow cực kỳ natural với các discourse markers tinh tế như “I’d like to recount”, “What initially drew my attention”, “Moreover”, “Since that conversation”. Không có awkward pauses hay repetitions, ideas được develop một cách logic và smooth.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• “serendipitous encounter” – much more sophisticated than “unexpected meeting”
• “exuded an air of quiet confidence” – shows ability to describe impressions vividly
• “delicate balance”, “socioeconomic implications”, “preconceived notions” – demonstrates academic vocabulary used naturally
• “struck a chord”, “transcended”, “epitomized” – idiomatic và precise usage

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Complex sentences: “What rendered this conversation so memorable and impactful was multifaceted”
• Relative clauses: “a black and white image capturing the essence of old Hanoi”
• Present participles: “seeking refuge from the scorching heat”
• Passive voice: “she was impeccably dressed”
• Advanced structures: “In an age where interactions are increasingly superficial”

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Không chỉ dừng ở việc kể chuyện mà còn reflect deeply về broader implications: human connection in digital age, value of serendipitous encounters, balance between tradition and modernity. Shows critical thinking và ability to connect personal experience to wider social context.

Thí sinh IELTS tự tin trình bày bài Speaking Part 2 về cuộc trò chuyện với người lạ

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2 để chuyển sang Part 3:

Question 1: Do you still keep in touch with this person?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“No, unfortunately we didn’t exchange contact information. It was just a one-time meeting, but I still remember the conversation clearly.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Actually, we didn’t exchange contact details, which in retrospect I somewhat regret. However, I think the ephemeral nature of the encounter was part of what made it so special – it was a pure, unencumbered exchange without the expectation of future contact, which somehow made it more authentic and meaningful.”

Question 2: Has this experience changed the way you interact with strangers?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, it has made me more open to talking to strangers. Now I try to be more friendly when people start conversations with me.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Absolutely, it’s fundamentally shifted my approach to chance encounters. I’m now much more receptive to spontaneous interactions and make a conscious effort to remain present and engaged when strangers initiate conversation. I’ve come to view these moments not as interruptions but as potential opportunities for unexpected insights and connections.”

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi trừu tượng và sâu sắc hơn, mở rộng từ chủ đề của Part 2. Đây là phần khó nhất vì yêu cầu bạn phải phân tích, so sánh, đánh giá và đưa ra quan điểm có lý lẽ về các vấn đề xã hội rộng hơn. Khác với Part 1 và 2, Part 3 không còn là nói về bản thân mà là thảo luận về society, trends, changes, và broader implications.

Chiến lược hiệu quả là mở rộng câu trả lời thành 3-5 câu với cấu trúc: direct answer, explanation/reason, example from society, và có thể thêm counter-argument hoặc nuance. Sử dụng discourse markers như “Well”, “Actually”, “I think” để tạo sự tự nhiên. Quan trọng là đưa ra examples từ xã hội, không chỉ từ kinh nghiệm cá nhân, và thừa nhận complexity của vấn đề bằng cách xem xét nhiều góc độ.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 3 bao gồm trả lời quá ngắn gọn như Part 1, thiếu phân tích sâu và lý lẽ rõ ràng, không đưa ra được examples cụ thể từ xã hội, và thiếu từ vựng trừu tượng để bàn về các concepts phức tạp. Một số bạn cũng có xu hướng quá general mà không specific, hoặc chỉ nói về một góc độ duy nhất mà không acknowledge other perspectives.

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Social Interaction and Modern Society

Question 1: Why do you think people are sometimes reluctant to talk to strangers?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause-Effect – phân tích nguyên nhân của một hiện tượng xã hội
• Key words: “reluctant” (miễn cưỡng, không muốn), “sometimes” (ngụ ý không phải lúc nào cũng vậy)
• Cách tiếp cận: Đưa ra 2-3 lý do chính với explanations, có thể đề cập đến cultural factors, safety concerns, social norms

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think there are several reasons why people don’t want to talk to strangers. First, they might be worried about safety, especially in big cities. Also, some people are naturally shy and feel uncomfortable talking to people they don’t know. In Vietnam, people are becoming busier, so they don’t have time to chat with strangers. Culture also plays a role – in some cultures, people are more reserved.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có list ra nhiều reasons nhưng mỗi reason chưa được elaborate deeply
• Vocabulary: Adequate với “worried about safety”, “naturally shy”, “reserved” nhưng còn basic
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points nhưng lacks depth of analysis, examples chưa specific, grammar structures đơn giản

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Well, I think this reluctance stems from a combination of factors, both psychological and societal. From a safety perspective, particularly in urban environments, there’s an inherent wariness that people develop – it’s a protective mechanism in response to potential risks, whether real or perceived. We’re constantly bombarded with news about scams or dangerous encounters, which naturally makes us more guarded.

Beyond safety concerns, I’d say there’s also a social anxiety component. Many people harbor fears about awkward interactions or worry they might intrude on someone’s personal space. In increasingly individualistic societies, we’ve perhaps lost some of the communal culture where talking to strangers was more normalized. Moreover, the digital age has paradoxically made us both more connected and more isolated – we’re so absorbed in our devices that we’ve erected invisible barriers around ourselves.

From a cultural standpoint, different societies have varying norms around stranger interaction. In some cultures, there’s a premium placed on privacy and personal boundaries, whereas others are more predisposed to spontaneous socializing. It’s also worth noting that the pace of modern life leaves many people feeling time-starved, so they might perceive conversations with strangers as time they can’t afford to spare rather than enriching opportunities.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized với clear progression từ safety → psychological → cultural → modern life factors
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated với “inherent wariness”, “protective mechanism”, “bombarded with”, “harbor fears”, “erected invisible barriers”, “there’s a premium placed on”
• Grammar: Complex structures với passives, participles, relative clauses: “it’s a protective mechanism in response to potential risks”, “the digital age has paradoxically made us…”
• Critical Thinking: Shows nuanced understanding bằng cách acknowledge multiple factors, uses hedging language (I’d say, perhaps, might), balanced view

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Well, I think”, “Beyond safety concerns”, “Moreover”, “From a cultural standpoint”
• Tentative language: “I’d say”, “perhaps”, “might perceive”, “it’s worth noting that”
• Abstract nouns: “reluctance”, “wariness”, “mechanism”, “perception”, “enriching opportunities”
• Sophisticated expressions: “stems from a combination of factors”, “paradoxically”, “erected invisible barriers”

---

Question 2: Do you think technology has made it easier or more difficult for people to have meaningful conversations with strangers?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion with comparison – đánh giá impact của technology, xem xét both sides
• Key words: “easier or more difficult” (yêu cầu so sánh), “meaningful conversations” (chất lượng, không phải số lượng)
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge both perspectives, sau đó state opinion của bạn với clear reasoning

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think technology has both positive and negative effects. On one hand, social media helps us connect with people from different countries easily. We can use translation apps to communicate even if we don’t speak the same language. On the other hand, people spend too much time on their phones and ignore people around them. They prefer texting to face-to-face conversation. So I believe technology makes it both easier and harder depending on how we use it.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic “on one hand… on the other hand” structure
• Vocabulary: Simple và predictable (positive/negative effects, connect with people, face-to-face conversation)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses both sides nhưng analysis shallow, thiếu specific examples và depth

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“This is quite a nuanced question, and I’d argue that technology presents a double-edged sword in this regard. On the surface, it seems technology should facilitate connections – we have countless platforms designed explicitly for meeting new people, from language exchange apps to travel communities. These tools can lower the barriers to initial contact, particularly for those who experience social anxiety in face-to-face settings. For instance, someone who’s naturally introverted might find it easier to strike up conversations online before meeting in person.

However, I believe technology has, on balance, actually hindered the quality of spontaneous, in-person interactions with strangers. The most glaring issue is what I call “the smartphone barrier” – people are so engrossed in their digital worlds that they’re physically present but mentally absent. We’ve lost the art of casual observation and serendipitous connection that used to happen naturally in public spaces. Think about public transport – where people once might have struck up conversations during long journeys, now everyone’s plugged into their devices.

More fundamentally, technology has altered our expectations of communication. We’ve become accustomed to curated interactions online, where we can carefully craft our responses and present polished versions of ourselves. This makes authentic, unscripted conversations with strangers feel more daunting by comparison. There’s also the issue of declining interpersonal skills – the less we practice face-to-face interaction with new people, the more uncomfortable it becomes, creating a self-reinforcing cycle.

That said, I don’t think technology is inherently the problem – rather, it’s our relationship with it. If used mindfully and moderately, technology can indeed complement real-world interactions. The key is ensuring it doesn’t become a substitute for genuine human connection.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated organization: acknowledge surface benefits → present main argument → provide deeper analysis → conclude with nuanced position
• Vocabulary: Advanced và precise: “double-edged sword”, “facilitate”, “glaring issue”, “engrossed in”, “serendipitous connection”, “curated interactions”, “self-reinforcing cycle”
• Grammar: Wide range: “it seems technology should facilitate connections”, “where people once might have struck up conversations”, “the less we practice… the more uncomfortable it becomes”
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates depth với multiple layers of analysis, acknowledges complexity, uses examples effectively, shows balanced reasoning while maintaining clear position

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “On the surface”, “However”, “More fundamentally”, “That said”
• Tentative language: “I’d argue that”, “I believe”, “I don’t think… inherently”
• Abstract nouns: “barriers”, “introverted”, “expectations”, “authenticity”, “substitute”
• Sophisticated collocations: “lower the barriers”, “on balance”, “glaring issue”, “self-reinforcing cycle”

Khi thảo luận về những thay đổi trong xã hội hiện đại, chúng ta cũng cần xem xét is it easier to become famous now ielts vì technology đã thay đổi nhiều khía cạnh của cuộc sống.

---

Theme 2: Cultural Differences and Communication

Question 3: How do communication styles differ between cultures, and why is this important to understand?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare + Explain significance – so sánh cultural differences và giải thích tầm quan trọng
• Key words: “communication styles” (cách giao tiếp), “differ between cultures”, “important to understand”
• Cách tiếp cận: Nêu 2-3 main differences, sau đó explain why understanding matters trong globalized world

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Different cultures have different ways of communicating. For example, in Western countries, people are usually more direct when they speak. They say exactly what they mean. But in Asian cultures like Vietnam, people are more indirect and polite. They try not to say things that might offend others. Understanding these differences is important because it helps us avoid misunderstandings when we work or travel internationally. If we don’t understand cultural differences, we might think someone is rude when they’re just communicating in their normal way.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic comparison followed by simple explanation of importance
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng predictable (direct, indirect, polite, misunderstandings)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points với general examples nhưng lacks sophistication và depth of analysis

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“Communication styles vary dramatically across cultures, and these variations manifest in numerous dimensions. Perhaps the most pronounced difference lies in directness versus indirectness. In what anthropologists call “low-context cultures” – typically Western societies like Germany or the United States – communication tends to be explicit and straightforward. People value clarity and expect messages to be conveyed directly. Conversely, in “high-context cultures” such as Japan, Vietnam, or many Middle Eastern societies, much of the meaning is derived from context rather than explicit words. People rely heavily on non-verbal cues, shared understanding, and reading between the lines.

Another critical dimension is the attitude toward hierarchy and formality. In more egalitarian societies, it’s perfectly acceptable to address authority figures by their first names and challenge their ideas openly. However, in cultures with strong hierarchical traditions, such familiarity would be considered deeply disrespectful. The level of formality in language, forms of address, and even body language can vary enormously.

As for why this understanding is paramount, I’d argue it’s essential for several interconnected reasons. First and foremost, in our increasingly globalized world, cross-cultural interactions are unavoidable – whether in business, education, or travel. Misinterpreting communication styles can lead to significant diplomatic or business blunders. What’s perceived as confidence in one culture might come across as arrogance in another; what’s intended as politeness might be seen as dishonesty.

Beyond avoiding faux pas, cultural communication competence enables us to build genuine rapport across cultures. When we understand that a Japanese colleague’s silence doesn’t indicate disinterest but rather thoughtful consideration, or that a Brazilian’s warm physical greetings aren’t overfamiliarity but cultural norm, we can respond appropriately and forge stronger connections. It also fosters empathy and challenges our tendency toward ethnocentrism – the assumption that our own cultural norms are universal or superior.

In a broader sense, understanding these differences contributes to more peaceful international relations and reduces xenophobia. Many conflicts stem from misunderstandings rooted in different communication styles. When we recognize that different doesn’t mean wrong, we become more tolerant and adaptable global citizens.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly organized với clear progression: types of differences → specific examples → multiple reasons for importance → broader implications
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated academic vocabulary: “manifest in numerous dimensions”, “pronounced difference”, “derived from context”, “egalitarian societies”, “paramount”, “ethnocentrism”, “xenophobia”
• Grammar: Complex và varied: passive voice, relative clauses, conditionals, noun clauses, participles
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates expert-level understanding với anthropological concepts (low/high context cultures), multiple perspectives, nuanced analysis, connection to broader social issues

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Perhaps the most pronounced”, “Conversely”, “Another critical dimension”, “As for why”, “Beyond avoiding”
• Tentative language: “I’d argue”, “might come across as”, “might be seen as”
• Abstract nouns: “dimensions”, “familiarity”, “competence”, “rapport”, “empathy”, “ethnocentrism”
• Academic expressions: “manifest in”, “derived from”, “rely heavily on”, “stem from”, “contributes to”

---

Theme 3: Social Skills and Personal Development

Question 4: Do you think schools should teach children how to communicate with people they don’t know? Why or why not?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Justification – đưa ra quan điểm về education policy và giải thích lý do
• Key words: “schools should teach”, “communicate with people they don’t know” (stranger interaction skills)
• Cách tiếp cận: State clear position, provide multiple supporting reasons, acknowledge potential counterarguments, conclude

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7-8:

“Yes, I strongly believe schools should include this in their curriculum. First, communication skills are essential for success in almost any career, and knowing how to interact appropriately with new people is a fundamental life skill. Many students, especially shy ones, struggle with this, so formal training could really help them.

Second, in today’s globalized world, we constantly meet people from different backgrounds, whether at work, university, or while traveling. If schools teach children the right ways to approach and talk to strangers respectfully and safely, they’ll be better prepared for real-world situations. This could include teaching them about body language, appropriate topics for initial conversations, and cultural sensitivity.

However, it’s important that this education also includes safety awareness. Children need to understand the difference between appropriate social interaction and dangerous situations. The teaching should balance encouraging openness and friendliness with maintaining appropriate caution.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position followed by multiple supporting points và consideration of limitations
• Vocabulary: Good range với “essential life skill”, “formal training”, “cultural sensitivity”, “safety awareness”
• Tại sao Band 7-8: Well-developed argument với logical reasoning và balanced view, nhưng có thể deeper vào societal implications

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“Absolutely, I’m a strong advocate for integrating communication skills training, specifically regarding stranger interaction, into school curricula, and I’ll elaborate on why I consider this not just beneficial but essential.

Firstly, we need to recognize that effective communication with unfamiliar individuals is a cornerstone of social and professional success. Yet, paradoxically, it’s a skill that’s rarely explicitly taught. Most people learn through trial and error, which can result in years of social awkwardness or missed opportunities. By providing structured guidance early on, we can equip young people with confidence and competence that will serve them throughout their lives. This is particularly crucial for children who are naturally introverted or come from families where such social interaction isn’t modeled.

Moreover, in an era of increasing social isolation – partly due to technology and partly due to changing community structures – many children are growing up with limited exposure to diverse social situations. Schools can fill this gap by creating safe, supervised environments where students can practice and refine these skills. This could encompass everything from maintaining appropriate eye contact and reading social cues to navigating small talk and understanding contextual appropriateness.

From a societal perspective, I believe such education could address several pressing issues. It could help combat the erosion of social cohesion we’re witnessing in many communities, where people increasingly retreat into their private bubbles. Teaching children the value and joy of spontaneous social interaction might cultivate a more connected, empathetic generation. Additionally, in our multicultural societies, understanding how to communicate respectfully with people from diverse backgrounds is invaluable for social harmony.

Now, I must acknowledge the legitimate concerns parents might have about stranger danger. However, I’d argue this makes age-appropriate education even more critical. Rather than instilling blanket fear of strangers, which can hinder social development, schools can teach nuanced understanding – helping children distinguish between safe social contexts like school events or supervised public spaces and genuinely risky situations. The goal isn’t to make children indiscriminately trusting but rather socially confident within appropriate boundaries.

In practical terms, such programs could include role-playing exercises, guided group discussions, exposure to various social scenarios, and even supervised real-world practice like community service where interaction with unfamiliar people is inherent to the activity. The curriculum could also address digital communication with strangers, teaching online safety alongside virtual etiquette.

To sum up, given that social skills profoundly impact quality of life, career prospects, and societal wellbeing, schools have a responsibility to prepare children comprehensively – and this undoubtedly includes how to communicate effectively and safely with people they don’t yet know.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated argument structure với clear position → multiple detailed supporting arguments → acknowledgment of counterarguments → practical suggestions → strong conclusion
• Vocabulary: Expert-level với “cornerstone of”, “paradoxically”, “equip young people with”, “encompass”, “erosion of social cohesion”, “cultivate”, “instilling blanket fear”, “indiscriminately trusting”
• Grammar: Full range of complex structures used naturally và accurately: “it’s a skill that’s rarely explicitly taught”, “by providing structured guidance”, “rather than instilling blanket fear, which can hinder…”
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates sophisticated analysis với multiple perspectives (individual, societal, practical), addresses counterarguments effectively, proposes concrete solutions, shows awareness of complexity

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Absolutely”, “Firstly”, “Moreover”, “From a societal perspective”, “Now, I must acknowledge”, “In practical terms”, “To sum up”
• Tentative language: “I’m a strong advocate for”, “I believe”, “I’d argue”, “could help”, “might cultivate”
• Abstract nouns: “cornerstone”, “competence”, “isolation”, “cohesion”, “empathy”, “nuanced understanding”
• Sophisticated expressions: “not just beneficial but essential”, “trial and error”, “fill this gap”, “combat the erosion of”, “retreat into”, “profoundly impact”

Học viên thảo luận IELTS Speaking Part 3 về giao tiếp xã hội và văn hóa

---

Question 5: In what ways has the COVID-19 pandemic affected how people interact with strangers?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Describe changes/effects – phân tích impact của một sự kiện cụ thể
• Key words: “COVID-19 pandemic”, “affected”, “interact with strangers” (changes in behavior và attitudes)
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple dimensions of change (behavioral, psychological, technological), provide specific examples, có thể speculate về long-term implications

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“The pandemic has fundamentally altered stranger interactions in ways that are both obvious and subtle, and I suspect some of these changes may prove permanent.

Most visibly, there’s been a dramatic shift in physical interaction norms. The concept of personal space has expanded considerably – what was once considered a comfortable conversational distance now feels uncomfortably close for many. Simple gestures like handshakes have become fraught with health anxiety, leading to the widespread adoption of alternative greetings like elbow bumps or even just verbal acknowledgments. Masks, while serving a practical purpose, have also created a barrier to communication by obscuring facial expressions, making it significantly harder to read emotions and establish rapport with people we don’t know.

From a psychological standpoint, I think the pandemic has intensified pre-existing wariness about strangers. We already discussed earlier how people had protective mechanisms regarding unfamiliar individuals, but COVID-19 added a new dimension – strangers became potential health threats. This heightened vigilance manifests in various ways: people actively avoiding others in public spaces, crossing the street to maintain distance, or feeling anxious in crowded environments where interaction is unavoidable. For some, this has reinforced social anxiety or even developed into new phobias.

Paradoxically, however, the pandemic has also fostered new forms of connection. The shared experience of living through a global crisis created a sense of solidarity that sometimes transcended the usual reservations about stranger interaction. I noticed people becoming more willing to offer assistance to vulnerable neighbors they’d never spoken to before, or engaging in conversations about shared challenges. Online communities also flourished as people sought connection while physically isolated, leading to virtual stranger interactions that might not have occurred otherwise.

In terms of long-term implications, I believe we’re witnessing a bifurcation. Some people have become more appreciative of in-person social interaction precisely because it was restricted, and may actually be more proactive about engaging with others now. Conversely, others have adapted to reduced social contact and may permanently retreat into more isolated lifestyles. The jury’s still out on which trajectory will predominate, but it’s clear that the pandemic has left an indelible mark on our social fabric, including how we relate to people we don’t know.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Comprehensive analysis organized by dimensions: physical changes → psychological impact → paradoxical effects → long-term implications
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và topic-specific: “fundamentally altered”, “fraught with”, “obscuring facial expressions”, “heightened vigilance”, “bifurcation”, “indelible mark”
• Grammar: Complex structures used flexibly: “what was once considered…”, “while serving a practical purpose”, “precisely because it was restricted”
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates nuanced thinking bằng cách acknowledge both negative và positive effects, recognize paradoxes, speculate thoughtfully về future, show awareness of societal complexity

Tương tự như cách mà describe a place in your country that you want to visit again có thể thay đổi sau đại dịch, các tương tác xã hội cũng đã biến đổi đáng kể.

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
strike up a conversation	phrase	/straɪk ʌp ə ˌkɒnvəˈseɪʃən/	bắt đầu một cuộc trò chuyện	I managed to strike up a conversation with the person next to me on the flight.	strike up a friendship, strike up a relationship
break the ice	idiom	/breɪk ðə aɪs/	phá vỡ sự im lặng, làm tan băng không khí	His joke helped break the ice and made everyone feel more comfortable.	break the ice with humor, break the ice successfully
spontaneous interaction	noun phrase	/spɒnˈteɪniəs ˌɪntərˈækʃən/	tương tác tự phát, không có kế hoạch trước	I enjoy spontaneous interactions with interesting people I meet while traveling.	spontaneous conversation, spontaneous exchange
establish rapport	phrase	/ɪˈstæblɪʃ ræˈpɔː(r)/	thiết lập mối quan hệ tốt, tạo sự kết nối	It’s important to establish rapport quickly in a job interview.	build rapport, develop rapport, create rapport
gauge the situation	phrase	/ɡeɪdʒ ðə ˌsɪtʃuˈeɪʃən/	đánh giá tình huống	I paused to gauge the situation before deciding whether to join the conversation.	gauge someone’s reaction, gauge the mood
common ground	noun phrase	/ˈkɒmən ɡraʊnd/	điểm chung, mối quan tâm chung	Finding common ground with strangers makes conversation much easier.	find common ground, establish common ground, seek common ground
awkward silence	noun phrase	/ˈɔːkwəd ˈsaɪləns/	sự im lặng khó xử	There was an awkward silence after I asked that personal question.	fill an awkward silence, break an awkward silence
small talk	noun	/smɔːl tɔːk/	những cuộc trò chuyện phiếm, chuyện phiếm	I’m not very good at small talk with people I’ve just met.	make small talk, engage in small talk, master small talk
serendipitous encounter	noun phrase	/ˌserənˈdɪpɪtəs ɪnˈkaʊntə(r)/	cuộc gặp gỡ tình cờ may mắn	Our meeting was a serendipitous encounter that changed my life.	serendipitous discovery, serendipitous moment
meaningful connection	noun phrase	/ˈmiːnɪŋfəl kəˈnekʃən/	sự kết nối có ý nghĩa	Despite only talking for an hour, we formed a meaningful connection.	meaningful relationship, meaningful conversation, meaningful exchange
superficial interaction	noun phrase	/ˌsuːpəˈfɪʃəl ˌɪntərˈækʃən/	tương tác hời hợt, nông cạn	I prefer having a few meaningful conversations to many superficial interactions.	superficial conversation, superficial relationship
intergenerational dialogue	noun phrase	/ˌɪntədʒenəˈreɪʃənəl ˈdaɪəlɒɡ/	cuộc đối thoại liên thế hệ	Intergenerational dialogue helps bridge the gap between young and old.	intergenerational communication, intergenerational exchange
social cues	noun phrase	/ˈsəʊʃəl kjuːz/	tín hiệu xã hội, dấu hiệu trong giao tiếp	She’s very good at reading social cues and knowing when to change topics.	read social cues, pick up on social cues, miss social cues
approachable	adjective	/əˈprəʊtʃəbəl/	dễ gần, dễ tiếp cận	His friendly smile made him seem very approachable.	seem approachable, appear approachable, make yourself approachable
reserved	adjective	/rɪˈzɜːvd/	kín đáo, dè dặt, dành dặt	Vietnamese people can sometimes seem reserved when meeting strangers.	naturally reserved, quite reserved, somewhat reserved
reciprocal	adjective	/rɪˈsɪprəkəl/	có đi có lại, tương hỗ	Good conversation requires reciprocal effort from both people.	reciprocal relationship, reciprocal trust, reciprocal respect
profound impact	noun phrase	/prəˈfaʊnd ˈɪmpækt/	tác động sâu sắc	That conversation had a profound impact on how I view life.	profound effect, profound influence, profound impression
thought-provoking	adjective	/ˈθɔːt prəˌvəʊkɪŋ/	kích thích tư duy, gợi suy nghĩ	She asked some really thought-provoking questions.	thought-provoking question, thought-provoking discussion, thought-provoking conversation
articulate	verb/adjective	/ɑːˈtɪkjuleɪt/	diễn đạt rõ ràng	He was able to articulate his ideas very clearly despite language barriers.	articulate clearly, articulate thoughts, well-articulated
candid conversation	noun phrase	/ˈkændɪd ˌkɒnvəˈseɪʃən/	cuộc trò chuyện thẳng thắn, chân thành	We had a candid conversation about our life experiences.	candid discussion, candid exchange, candid dialogue

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
stuck with me	để lại ấn tượng sâu sắc, khó quên	That conversation really stuck with me and influenced my career choice.	7.5-9
struck a chord	chạm đến cảm xúc, gây được tiếng vang	What he said about family values really struck a chord with me.	7.5-9
kicked off	bắt đầu (cách nói thân mật hơn)	The conversation kicked off when we discovered we both loved photography.	7-8
a breath of fresh air	một làn gió mới, điều gì đó mới mẻ dễ chịu	Meeting someone so optimistic was a breath of fresh air.	7.5-9
opened my eyes	mở mang tầm mắt, làm nhận ra điều gì đó	That conversation opened my eyes to different perspectives.	7-8
left an indelible mark	để lại dấu ấn khó phai, không thể xóa nhòa	His words left an indelible mark on my approach to life.	8-9
food for thought	điều đáng suy nghĩ	His perspective on education gave me a lot of food for thought.	7-8
mind-opening experience	trải nghiệm mở mang đầu óc	Talking to travelers from different countries was a mind-opening experience.	7-8
hit it off	hợp nhau, có ấn tượng tốt ngay từ đầu	We hit it off immediately and talked for hours.	7-8
on the same wavelength	cùng suy nghĩ, cùng tần số	We were completely on the same wavelength about sustainable living.	7.5-8.5
planted a seed	gieo một hạt giống (ý tưởng)	That conversation planted a seed that eventually grew into my business idea.	8-9
double-edged sword	con dao hai lưỡi, có cả mặt tốt và xấu	Social media is a double-edged sword for meeting new people.	8-9

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Khi cần một chút thời gian để suy nghĩ hoặc muốn câu trả lời nghe tự nhiên hơn
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc thông tin bất ngờ
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi nói thật hoặc chia sẻ quan điểm cá nhân trung thực
• 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm dựa trên suy xét cá nhân
• 📝 In my experience,… – Khi dựa vào kinh nghiệm bản thân
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Khi nói về góc nhìn của mình

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, ngoài ra (nhấn mạnh)
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, thêm vào đó
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến, chưa nói đến
• 📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó (formal hơn)
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài điều đó ra
• 📝 Another thing is… – Một điều khác là

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng chúng ta cũng cần xem xét
• 📝 That said,… – Tuy nhiên, dù vậy thì (để đưa ra ý đối lập)
• 📝 Having said that,… – Sau khi nói điều đó, tuy nhiên

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, xét cho cùng
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, xét về lâu dài
• 📝 To sum up,… – Để tóm tắt lại
• 📝 In a nutshell,… – Nói tóm lại, nói gọn lại

Để làm rõ hoặc diễn giải:

• 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác
• 📝 To put it simply,… – Nói một cách đơn giản
• 📝 Let me put it this way,… – Để tôi nói theo cách này

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

• Mixed conditional: “If I hadn’t struck up that conversation, I wouldn’t be working in this field now.” (Kết hợp quá khứ và hiện tại để show consequence)

• Inversion: “Had I known how impactful that conversation would be, I would have taken notes.” (Đảo ngữ để nhấn mạnh, formal và impressive)

• Implied conditional: “With better social skills, many people would find it easier to network professionally.” (Conditional ẩn, sophisticated)

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

• Non-defining: “That stranger, who turned out to be a renowned professor, completely changed my perspective.” (Bổ sung thông tin, cần có dấu phẩy)

• Reduced relative clause: “The conversation happening at the next table caught my attention.” (Rút gọn bằng V-ing, ngắn gọn hơn)

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

• It is thought/believed/said that…: “It is widely believed that first impressions are formed within seconds.” (Impersonal passive, academic)

• To be + past participle: “I was struck by how articulate he was despite his young age.” (Nhấn mạnh object của hành động)

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

• What + clause + is/was…: “What I found most impressive was his genuine interest in my opinions.” (Nhấn mạnh phần quan trọng)

• It + is/was + that/who…: “It was the authenticity of our exchange that made it so memorable.” (Focus vào một yếu tố cụ thể)

5. Participle Clauses (Mệnh đề phân từ):

• Present participle: “Having experienced social anxiety myself, I understand why some people avoid talking to strangers.” (Chỉ nguyên nhân hoặc thời gian)

• Past participle: “Encouraged by his friendly demeanor, I decided to share my story.” (Chỉ trạng thái hoặc nguyên nhân bị động)

6. Inversion for Emphasis (Đảo ngữ nhấn mạnh):

• Not only… but also: “Not only did that conversation change my perspective, but it also inspired me to travel more.” (Nhấn mạnh hai ý)

• Rarely/Seldom: “Rarely have I met someone so willing to share personal experiences with a stranger.” (Nhấn mạnh tính hiếm)

Khi phát triển kỹ năng giao tiếp, việc describe a time you helped someone with a problem cũng thường liên quan đến việc trò chuyện và xây dựng rapport với người khác.

Chiến lược và lời khuyên từ examiner

Những sai lầm thường gặp cần tránh

1. Học thuộc template và áp dụng máy móc

Nhiều học viên Việt Nam có xu hướng học thuộc các mẫu câu và cố gắng nhồi nhét chúng vào câu trả lời. Điều này làm cho bài nói nghe không tự nhiên và examiner dễ dàng nhận ra. Thay vào đó, hãy hiểu cấu trúc và vocabulary rồi áp dụng linh hoạt theo ngữ cảnh thực tế của bạn.

2. Sử dụng từ vựng quá phức tạp không phù hợp

Việc dùng từ academic như “serendipitous” hay “multifaceted” là tốt, nhưng chỉ khi bạn sử dụng chúng đúng ngữ cảnh và tự nhiên. Nếu mỗi câu đều chứa từ hiếm, nó sẽ nghe giả tạo. Hãy mix giữa advanced vocabulary và everyday expressions để nghe natural.

3. Trả lời quá ngắn hoặc quá dài

Part 1 nên 2-3 câu, Part 2 phải đủ 2 phút, Part 3 nên 3-5 câu. Nhiều học viên hoặc nói quá ngắn làm mất cơ hội thể hiện ability, hoặc nói lan man không đúng trọng tâm. Hãy practice timing để có cảm giác về độ dài phù hợp.

4. Thiếu specific examples

Câu trả lời chung chung như “people nowadays are busy” rất yếu. Hãy luôn support ideas với concrete examples: “For instance, in Hanoi, many office workers commute for 2-3 hours daily, leaving little time for social interaction.”

5. Không trả lời đúng câu hỏi

Đôi khi vì quá tập trung vào việc nói nhiều, học viên quên trả lời chính xác câu hỏi. Nếu được hỏi “Why…”, bạn phải giải thích reasons. Nếu “How…”, bạn phải describe process hoặc method.

6. Ngữ điệu monotone và thiếu eye contact

Speaking không chỉ là words mà còn là delivery. Nếu bạn nói với giọng đều đều như robot, không có intonation và không nhìn examiner, điểm pronunciation và fluency sẽ bị ảnh hưởng. Hãy practice nói với emotion và maintain natural eye contact.

Cách chuẩn bị hiệu quả cho chủ đề này

Giai đoạn 1: Build vocabulary foundation (2-3 tuần)

Học từ vựng theo clusters, không học đơn lẻ. Ví dụ: “conversation” đi với strike up, engage in, have, meaningful, candid. Tạo mind maps cho các sub-topics như types of conversations, places to meet strangers, feelings about interaction. Mỗi ngày học 10-15 từ mới và review từ cũ bằng flashcards hoặc Anki.

Giai đoạn 2: Collect personal stories (1 tuần)

Brainstorm 5-6 real experiences về conversations với strangers. Không cần phải extraordinary – thậm chí một cuộc trò chuyện thú vị ở bus stop cũng được. Note down details: who, when, where, what, why special. Điều quan trọng là bạn có thể kể câu chuyện này naturally vì nó là real.

Giai đoạn 3: Practice với structure (2-3 tuần)

Record yourself trả lời các câu hỏi Part 1, 2, 3. Listen lại và identify problems: hesitations, repetitions, grammar errors, lack of vocabulary. Re-record sau khi improve. Aim for smooth delivery với natural pauses for thinking chứ không phải struggling pauses. Practice Part 2 với timer để ensure bạn nói đủ 2 phút.

Giai đoạn 4: Mock tests và feedback (1-2 tuần trước thi)

Tìm study partner hoặc teacher để conduct mock tests. Điều quan trọng là getting feedback từ người khác vì chúng ta often không nhận ra lỗi của mình. Focus vào specific areas cần improve based on feedback. Trong giai đoạn cuối, practice cả set 3 parts liên tiếp như real test.

Tips trong phòng thi

Trước khi vào:

• Đến sớm 30 phút để calm down và review key vocabulary
• Đừng cố học thêm từ mới phút chót – sẽ khiến bạn confused
• Breathe deeply và nhắc nhở bản thân đây là một cuộc conversation, không phải interrogation

Trong Part 1:

• Listen carefully để understand câu hỏi chính xác
• Mỉm cười và maintain friendly demeanor
• Nếu không hiểu, đừng ngại ask for clarification: “Sorry, could you repeat that?”
• Không trả lời Yes/No rồi dừng – always extend với reason hoặc example

Trong Part 2:

• Sử dụng đủ 1 phút chuẩn bị – đừng bắt đầu nói sớm
• Note down keywords cho mỗi bullet point, không viết câu
• Nếu hết ý trước 2 phút, elaborate thêm về feelings hoặc explain why
• Đừng panic nếu examiner stop bạn – đó là normal sign bạn đã nói đủ

Trong Part 3:

• Take a moment để think trước khi answer – “That’s an interesting question” để buy time
• Structure answer clearly: direct answer → explanation → example → conclusion
• Show critical thinking bằng cách acknowledge complexity: “It depends…”, “There are multiple factors…”
• Nếu không biết topic cụ thể được mention, admit honestly và speak generally: “I’m not very familiar with that specific case, but generally speaking…”

Mindset quan trọng:
Hãy nhớ examiner không phải là kẻ thù trying to trip you up. Họ muốn bạn thành công và đang assess khả năng communicate của bạn, không phải test kiến thức. Treat nó như một friendly conversation với ai đó interested trong opinions của bạn. Confidence (không phải arrogance) thực sự makes a difference trong delivery.

---

Chủ đề “describe a conversation with a stranger that left a positive impression” là một trong những topics thực tế và relatable nhất trong IELTS Speaking. Với sự chuẩn bị kỹ lưỡng qua các bài mẫu, vocabulary và strategies trong bài viết này, bạn hoàn toàn có thể tự tin đạt band điểm mục tiêu. Hãy nhớ rằng authenticity và natural delivery quan trọng hơn việc cố gắng impress examiner bằng từ vựng quá phức tạp. Practice regularly, get feedback, và develop your own style of speaking sẽ đưa bạn đến thành công trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking.