IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “How Much Is IELTS Advantage VIP Course” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề về các khóa học IELTS và việc đầu tư cho việc học tiếng Anh là một góc độ thường xuất hiện trong IELTS Speaking, đặc biệt khi nói về giáo dục, sự phát triển cá nhân, hoặc các quyết định tài chính. Mặc dù câu hỏi trực tiếp về “How Much Is Ielts Advantage Vip Course” ít khi xuất hiện nguyên văn, nhưng các câu hỏi liên quan đến chi phí học tập, đầu tư cho giáo dục, lựa chọn khóa học xuất hiện khá thường xuyên trong các kỳ thi IELTS từ 2020 đến nay, với tần suất khoảng trung bình đến cao.

Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai: Cao – đặc biệt trong bối cảnh ngày càng nhiều người quan tâm đến việc học IELTS và các khóa học online.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được:

• Các câu hỏi IELTS Speaking thực tế về giáo dục, khóa học, và quyết định đầu tư
• Bài mẫu chi tiết theo 3 band điểm (6-7, 7.5-8, 8.5-9) cho cả 3 Part
• Từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm về chủ đề education và investment
• Chiến lược trả lời từ góc nhìn của Examiner với hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm
• Cách tránh những lỗi phổ biến của học viên Việt Nam khi nói về tiền bạc và giáo dục

---

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về đời sống hàng ngày. Examiner muốn đánh giá khả năng giao tiếp tự nhiên của bạn trong các tình huống quen thuộc. Chiến lược quan trọng là trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, sau đó mở rộng thêm 1-2 câu với lý do hoặc ví dụ cụ thể.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn gọn, chỉ “Yes” hoặc “No” mà không giải thích
• Sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “bad”, “interesting”
• Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân, khiến câu trả lời trở nên chung chung
• Ngại nói về tiền bạc vì văn hóa Việt Nam coi đây là chủ đề nhạy cảm

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you enjoy learning English?

Question 2: How do you usually learn new things?

Question 3: Have you taken any courses recently?

Question 4: Do you prefer studying alone or with others?

Question 5: What’s the most challenging thing about learning English?

Question 6: Do you think it’s important to invest in education?

Question 7: How much time do you spend on self-study each week?

Question 8: What kinds of learning resources do you use?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

---

Question: Have you taken any courses recently?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có hoặc không
• Nêu tên khóa học (hoặc lý do chưa tham gia)
• Giải thích mục đích hoặc lợi ích

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I have. I’m taking an IELTS preparation course at a local center. The course is quite helpful because it teaches me test strategies and provides practice materials. I attend classes twice a week.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời rõ ràng, có thông tin cụ thể về khóa học và tần suất học
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (helpful, teaches), cấu trúc câu chưa đa dạng
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời đủ dài và có nội dung nhưng thiếu sự tinh tế trong ngôn ngữ. Vocabulary ở mức adequate nhưng chưa sophisticated.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Actually, yes. I’ve been enrolled in an intensive IELTS preparation program for the past two months. What really drew me to this particular course was the comprehensive curriculum that covers all four skills, plus the fact that it offers personalized feedback from experienced instructors. I find the structured approach really conducive to my learning style.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Vocabulary nâng cao: “enrolled in”, “intensive”, “comprehensive curriculum”, “conducive to”
  • Cấu trúc câu phức: sử dụng relative clause “that covers…” và “the fact that…”
  • Ý tưởng chi tiết và specific về lý do chọn khóa học
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Câu trả lời tự nhiên, mạch lạc với discourse marker “Actually”
  • Vocabulary: Precise and sophisticated với collocations chuẩn
  • Grammar: Mixed tenses (present perfect continuous, simple present) chính xác
  • Pronunciation: Các từ nhiều âm tiết cho thấy khả năng phát âm tốt

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• be enrolled in: ghi danh, đăng ký vào khóa học
• draw someone to something: thu hút ai đó
• comprehensive curriculum: chương trình học toàn diện
• personalized feedback: phản hồi cá nhân hóa
• conducive to: có lợi cho, tạo điều kiện thuận lợi cho

---

Question: Do you think it’s important to invest in education?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đưa ra quan điểm rõ ràng (Yes/No/It depends)
• Giải thích tại sao với 1-2 lý do
• Có thể thêm ví dụ ngắn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think it’s very important. Education can help us get better jobs and earn more money in the future. Many successful people have spent money on their education. So I believe investing in education is a good decision.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có quan điểm rõ ràng, đưa ra lý do logic
• Hạn chế: Ý tưởng còn surface-level, thiếu depth. Từ vựng đơn giản (good decision, better jobs)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời đáp ứng yêu cầu cơ bản nhưng chưa impressive. Thiếu examples cụ thể hoặc perspective sâu hơn.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Absolutely. I’d say that education is probably one of the most worthwhile investments you can make in yourself. Not only does it equip you with practical skills and knowledge, but it also opens doors to opportunities that might otherwise be out of reach. In my case, taking professional courses has significantly enhanced my career prospects and boosted my confidence in the workplace.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Vocabulary sophisticated: “worthwhile investments”, “equip you with”, “out of reach”, “significantly enhanced”
  • Cấu trúc “Not only… but also…” tạo sự cân bằng
  • Personal example làm câu trả lời thuyết phục hơn
  • Discourse marker “Absolutely” thể hiện strong agreement tự nhiên
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Natural và confident với appropriate intonation
  • Vocabulary: Idiomatic expressions như “opens doors to” sử dụng chính xác
  • Grammar: Inversion với “Not only does it…”, present perfect “has enhanced”
  • Ideas: Balanced view với cả practical benefits và personal development

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• worthwhile investment: khoản đầu tư xứng đáng
• equip someone with something: trang bị cho ai cái gì
• open doors to: mở ra cơ hội
• out of reach: ngoài tầm với
• significantly enhance: cải thiện đáng kể
• boost one’s confidence: tăng cường sự tự tin

---

Question: How much time do you spend on self-study each week?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đưa ra con số cụ thể (hoặc ước lượng)
• Giải thích bạn dành thời gian đó như thế nào
• Có thể nói về challenges nếu phù hợp

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I spend about 5-6 hours per week on self-study. I usually study in the evening after work. I watch English videos and practice grammar exercises. Sometimes I don’t have enough time because I’m busy with work.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có số liệu cụ thể, nói về thói quen học tập
• Hạn chế: Còn list information chứ chưa elaborate deeply. “Busy with work” là lý do quá chung chung
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate information nhưng thiếu sophistication trong cách diễn đạt và ý tưởng

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, I try to dedicate around seven to eight hours weekly to independent study, though it varies depending on my workload. I’ve found that breaking it down into smaller chunks throughout the week works better than marathon study sessions. Typically, I’ll spend about an hour each evening immersing myself in English podcasts or working through practice questions. What I find most challenging is maintaining consistency when work gets hectic, but I’ve learned that even brief, focused sessions can be remarkably effective.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Vocabulary range impressive: “dedicate”, “chunks”, “marathon sessions”, “immersing myself in”, “remarkably effective”
  • Natural hedging language: “around”, “though it varies”, “typically”
  • Reflects critical thinking: so sánh different study approaches
  • Personal insight về challenges và solutions
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Well-developed response với cohesive devices “Well”, “Typically”, “What I find…”
  • Vocabulary: Metaphorical language như “marathon sessions”, “chunks” sử dụng naturally
  • Grammar: Complex sentences với reduced relative clause “when work gets hectic”
  • Ideas: Shows self-awareness và learning strategy

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• dedicate time to something: dành thời gian cho việc gì
• independent study: tự học
• break down into chunks: chia nhỏ thành từng phần
• marathon study session: buổi học kéo dài liên tục
• immerse oneself in: đắm mình vào
• maintain consistency: duy trì sự kiên trì
• brief, focused session: buổi học ngắn nhưng tập trung
• remarkably effective: hiệu quả đáng kể

Học viên đang tự học IELTS Speaking tại nhà với laptop và tài liệu chuẩn bị cho kỳ thi

---

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để thể hiện khả năng nói liên tục và có tổ chức. Examiner sẽ không ngắt lời bạn cho đến khi hết thời gian.

Chiến lược quan trọng:

• Sử dụng đủ 1 phút chuẩn bị: Ghi chú keywords cho mỗi bullet point, KHÔNG viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Nói đủ 2 phút: Tối thiểu 1 phút 45 giây. Examiner sẽ cho điểm thấp nếu bạn nói dưới 1 phút 30 giây
• Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points: Đặc biệt là câu “explain” cuối cùng – đây là nơi ghi điểm cao nhất
• Organize ý tưởng: Theo thứ tự bullet points hoặc theo trình tự thời gian
• Sử dụng thì động từ chính xác: Quá khứ cho experiences, hiện tại cho habits/preferences

Lỗi thường gặp:

• Viết quá nhiều trong 1 phút chuẩn bị rồi đọc theo notes (nghe không tự nhiên)
• Nói quá nhanh để “xong” rồi im lặng còn 30 giây
• Bỏ sót bullet point cuối (explain) vì hết ý tưởng
• Lạc đề, nói về thứ không liên quan

Cue Card

Describe an important decision you made about your education or career

You should say:

• What the decision was
• When you made this decision
• What factors influenced your decision
• And explain why this decision was important to you

Phân Tích Đề Bài

• Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an experience/decision (past event)
• Thì động từ: Chủ yếu quá khứ (made, decided, was), có thể dùng present perfect để nói về impact hiện tại
• Bullet points phải cover:
  • What: Quyết định cụ thể là gì (ví dụ: đăng ký khóa học IELTS, chuyển ngành học, nghỉ việc để đi học)
  • When: Thời điểm (tháng/năm hoặc period như “last year”, “when I was in university”)
  • Factors: Những yếu tố ảnh hưởng (financial, career goals, advice from others, personal interests)
  • Explain: Đây là phần QUAN TRỌNG NHẤT – giải thích tại sao important, impact như thế nào
• Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là nơi bạn thể hiện critical thinking và personal reflection. Nên dành 30-40 giây cho phần này với vocabulary và ideas sâu sắc.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1 phút 50 giây

“I’d like to talk about an important decision I made last year about my career development. The decision was to enroll in an IELTS preparation course.

I made this decision in January 2023. At that time, I was working at a local company and I realized that my English skills were not good enough for better job opportunities. Many international companies require IELTS certificates, so I decided to take the test.

Several factors influenced my decision. First, my salary was quite low and I wanted to apply for positions at foreign companies that pay better. Second, my friend told me about an IELTS course that had good reviews and reasonable fees. Third, I had some savings and I thought it was a good time to invest in my education.

This decision was important to me because it opened up new possibilities. After taking the course and passing the IELTS test, I was able to apply for better jobs. Now I’m working at a multinational company with a higher salary. The course was expensive, but it was worth it because it changed my career path.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6.5	Nói khá trôi chảy, có organization cơ bản theo bullet points. Sử dụng một số linking words (First, Second, Third) nhưng còn mechanical. Có một số hesitation nhẹ khi chuyển ý.
Lexical Resource	6	Từ vựng adequate cho topic: “enroll in”, “influenced”, “invest in”, “opened up”, “worth it”. Tuy nhiên, còn nhiều từ đơn giản (good, better, low). Một số collocations đúng nhưng chưa sophisticated.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6.5	Mix được past simple và past continuous. Có một số complex sentences với “because”, “after”. Tuy nhiên, đa số là simple/compound sentences. Ít lỗi nh�ng không có variety cao.
Pronunciation	6.5	Phát âm rõ ràng, dễ hiểu. Word stress cơ bản đúng. Intonation khá flat, chưa có nhiều variation để tạo natural rhythm.

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đủ tất cả bullet points theo đúng thứ tự
• ✅ Nói đủ thời lượng với content relevant
• ✅ Có structure rõ ràng, dễ follow
• ✅ Sử dụng một số time markers (At that time, After, Now)

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary còn đơn giản và lặp lại (good, better xuất hiện nhiều lần)
• ⚠️ Thiếu descriptive details khiến bài nói chưa engaging
• ⚠️ Phần “explain” chưa deep enough, chưa elaborate về emotions hoặc personal growth
• ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đa dạng, thiếu advanced constructions

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2 phút 15 giây

“I’d like to share with you a pivotal decision I made regarding my professional development, which was to invest in a premium IELTS preparation program – specifically, an intensive course that cost about $800.

This decision came about roughly 18 months ago, at a time when I was at a crossroads in my career. I’d been working at a Vietnamese company for three years and, while the job was stable, I felt I’d reached a plateau in terms of growth opportunities. I came to realize that my limited English proficiency was the main barrier holding me back from advancing to more senior positions or transitioning to international firms.

Several factors played a role in my decision-making process. Financially speaking, the course was quite substantial – it represented nearly two months’ salary – but I viewed it as a long-term investment rather than an expense. I was also influenced by success stories from former students who’d significantly improved their scores and career prospects. Additionally, the course offered personalized coaching and comprehensive materials, which I felt would give me an edge over self-study.

Looking back, this decision was instrumental in shaping where I am today. The most important aspect wasn’t just passing the test with a Band 7.5, but the confidence and skills I gained throughout the process. It equipped me with the communication abilities to compete in the global job market. Within six months of completing the course, I secured a position at an international corporation, which has opened doors to opportunities I’d never imagined. While the upfront cost was considerable, the return on investment has been truly remarkable – both in financial terms and personal growth.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Speaks fluently với minimal hesitation. Cohesive devices sử dụng naturally (Looking back, Additionally, While). Ý tưởng được organize logically và elaborate đầy đủ.
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Vocabulary range wide và precise: “pivotal decision”, “at a crossroads”, “reached a plateau”, “instrumental in”. Collocations chuẩn: “play a role in”, “return on investment”. Một số less common phrases như “give me an edge”.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Variety tốt: past perfect “had been working”, passive voice “was influenced by”, relative clauses. Complex sentences natural. Ít lỗi ngữ pháp.
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear pronunciation với good intonation patterns. Word/sentence stress appropriate. Natural rhythm cho multi-syllable words.

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“good reviews”, “reasonable fees”, “opened up new possibilities”	“personalized coaching”, “comprehensive materials”, “instrumental in shaping”, “opened doors to opportunities”
Grammar	“I realized that my English skills were not good enough”	“I came to realize that my limited English proficiency was the main barrier holding me back”
Ideas	Basic explanation: khóa học giúp pass test, tìm được việc tốt hơn	Deeper reflection: confidence gained, skills acquired, long-term career impact, personal growth beyond just passing test
Organization	Straightforward chronological order	More sophisticated với reflective elements “Looking back” và contrasts “While…but”

Sinh viên Việt Nam đưa ra quyết định đầu tư khóa học IELTS cao cấp cho sự nghiệp

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2 phút 45 giây đầy đủ

“I’d like to talk about what I consider to be one of the most defining moments in my professional journey – the decision to make a significant financial commitment to an advanced IELTS preparation program, which, at the time, set me back approximately $1,200.

This turning point occurred about two years ago, during what I’d describe as a period of professional soul-searching. I’d been working in the marketing department of a domestic firm for several years and, while I’d climbed the ladder to a certain extent, I found myself increasingly frustrated by the glass ceiling I’d encountered. It became abundantly clear that without demonstrable English proficiency – specifically, a credible IELTS certificate – my career trajectory would remain severely limited, regardless of my expertise or dedication.

The decision-making process was far from straightforward, and multiple considerations came into play. From a purely financial standpoint, the course fee was nothing to sneeze at – it amounted to almost 40% of my monthly income at the time. I had to weigh this against the opportunity cost of not investing, which potentially meant years of stagnation. What ultimately tipped the scales was conducting thorough due diligence – I scrutinized reviews, attended a trial class, and spoke with alumni who’d reaped substantial benefits. The program’s stellar reputation for producing high band scores, combined with its emphasis on personalized feedback and cutting-edge teaching methodologies, convinced me that this was a calculated risk worth taking.

With the benefit of hindsight, I can confidently say this decision was absolutely transformative – and I use that word deliberately. Beyond the tangible outcome of achieving a Band 8.0, which directly facilitated my transition to a senior role at a multinational corporation, the experience fundamentally altered my relationship with learning itself. The intensive training instilled in me a level of linguistic confidence I’d never possessed before, enabling me to articulate complex ideas in high-stakes situations, from client presentations to international negotiations. Moreover, the substantial initial outlay proved to be what I now recognize as one of my most prudent investments – the salary increment alone recouped the course fee within three months, not to mention the intangible benefits like expanded professional networks and enhanced self-efficacy. Looking at it through a broader lens, this decision taught me an invaluable lesson about the exponential returns that can come from strategically investing in one’s capabilities during critical junctures in your career.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	9	Speaks fluently và coherently với full range of cohesive devices used naturally và appropriately. Ý tưởng phát triển logical với sophisticated organization. Không hesitation ngoài natural pauses for effect.
Lexical Resource	9	Wide vocabulary range với precise và sophisticated usage. Idiomatic language natural: “set me back”, “nothing to sneeze at”, “tipped the scales”. Less common lexical items: “demonstrable”, “scrutinized”, “exponential returns”. Collocations native-like: “conduct due diligence”, “recoup the fee”.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	9	Full range of structures với flexibility. Complex sentences effortless: cleft sentences “What ultimately tipped…”, inversion “Beyond the tangible outcome…”, participle clauses “enabling me to articulate…”. Error-free throughout.
Pronunciation	9	Pronunciation exemplary với effective use of intonation patterns. Natural rhythm and stress. Multi-syllable words pronounced accurately: “demonstrable”, “methodologies”, “exponential”.

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Không có bất kỳ hesitation nào ngoài những pauses tự nhiên để tạo dramatic effect. Sử dụng sophisticated discourse markers như “With the benefit of hindsight”, “Looking at it through a broader lens” một cách tự nhiên.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:
Ví dụ: “set me back” (idiom cho “cost”) thay vì “cost me”, “nothing to sneeze at” (idiom cho “significant amount”) thay vì “expensive”, “tipped the scales” (idiom cho “made the final decision”) – tất cả đều native-like và contextually appropriate.

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:
Ví dụ: “What ultimately tipped the scales was conducting thorough due diligence” – đây là cleft sentence structure (It was…that) được invert để emphasize. “Beyond the tangible outcome of achieving Band 8.0, which directly facilitated my transition…” – complex sentence với relative clause embedded naturally.

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Không chỉ dừng lại ở surface level (học khóa, pass test, có việc tốt) mà phân tích deeper impacts: “fundamentally altered my relationship with learning”, “instilled linguistic confidence”, “enhanced self-efficacy”. Reflect về lesson learned: “exponential returns from strategically investing during critical junctures”.

🎨 Metaphorical Language:
Sử dụng metaphor một cách tinh tế: “glass ceiling” (invisible barrier to advancement), “professional soul-searching” (deep reflection), “turning point” (pivotal moment), cho thấy ability to use figurative language naturally.

🔗 Cohesion Natural:
Transition giữa các phần seamless với devices như “The decision-making process was far from straightforward”, “With the benefit of hindsight”, “Looking at it through a broader lens” – không mechanical như First/Second/Third.

---

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner thường hỏi 1-2 câu ngắn sau khi bạn kết thúc Part 2, để transition sang Part 3. Đây là câu hỏi đơn giản, chỉ cần trả lời ngắn gọn.

Question 1: Would you recommend this course to others?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, definitely. I think it’s a good course for people who want to improve their IELTS scores. The teachers are experienced and the materials are useful.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Without hesitation, yes. I’d say it’s particularly well-suited for those who are serious about achieving a competitive band score and are willing to put in the effort. The value proposition is excellent, especially considering the potential career dividends.”

💡 Key expressions: “without hesitation” (không do dự), “well-suited for” (phù hợp với), “value proposition” (giá trị đề xuất), “career dividends” (lợi ích nghề nghiệp – metaphor từ financial term)

---

Question 2: Was it difficult to afford the course?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, it was quite expensive for me at that time. I had to save money for several months. But I think it was a good investment.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Honestly, it did stretch my budget initially. I had to make some sacrifices and cut back on discretionary spending for a few months. However, I viewed it through the lens of opportunity cost – the potential earnings I’d miss out on by not improving my English far outweighed the upfront expense.”

💡 Key expressions: “stretch my budget” (làm căng ngân sách), “cut back on” (cắt giảm), “opportunity cost” (chi phí cơ hội – economics term), “miss out on” (bỏ lỡ), “upfront expense” (chi phí ban đầu)

---

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi trừu tượng, discuss về issues rộng hơn liên quan đến topic Part 2. Đây là phần khó nhất và phân biệt rõ giữa Band 6 và Band 8+.

Yêu cầu:

• Phân tích vấn đề từ nhiều góc độ (not just personal opinion)
• So sánh các situations, time periods, perspectives
• Đánh giá advantages/disadvantages, causes/effects
• Dự đoán future trends nếu được hỏi

Chiến lược:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời 3-5 câu với structure: Direct answer → Reason/Explanation → Example → Additional point/Conclusion
• Sử dụng discourse markers để organize ideas: “Well, I think…”, “On the one hand…, on the other hand…”, “What’s interesting is…”
• Đưa ra examples từ society, không chỉ personal experience như Part 1
• Acknowledge complexity: “It’s a complex issue”, “It depends on…”, “There are multiple factors…”
• Show balanced view: Không extreme opinions, consider different perspectives

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn (1-2 câu) như Part 1
• Chỉ nói về personal experience thay vì general trends
• Thiếu từ vựng abstract/academic
• Không elaborate reasons, chỉ state opinions
• Sợ disagree hoặc không dám nói “It depends”

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Education Investment and Accessibility

---

Question 1: Why do you think some people are willing to pay high fees for educational courses while others are not?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause/Reason – Why question
• Key words: “some people…while others” → cần contrast hai groups
• Cách tiếp cận:
  1. Direct answer về main reason
  2. Explain factors cho group 1 (willing to pay)
  3. Explain factors cho group 2 (not willing)
  4. Có thể add nuance về “it depends on…”

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think it depends on their financial situation and their goals. Some people have money and they believe education is important for their future, so they are willing to pay. Other people don’t have enough money or they think they can learn by themselves for free. Also, some people can see the long-term benefits of education while others focus on saving money now.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có contrast “some people…other people” nhưng còn basic
• Vocabulary: Simple words (have money, important, save money)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses câu hỏi adequately nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated language. Ideas ở surface level.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Well, I think this boils down to a combination of factors – primarily financial capacity, but also mindset and perceived value. On one end of the spectrum, we have individuals who view education as a strategic investment rather than an expense. These are typically people who’ve witnessed firsthand how quality education can be a game-changer in terms of career advancement, so they’re prepared to stretch their budgets or even take on debt for the right program. They tend to subscribe to the philosophy that knowledge is an asset that appreciates over time.

On the flip side, some people are more risk-averse or financially constrained, which is perfectly understandable. They might prioritize immediate needs over long-term investments, or perhaps they’ve had negative experiences where expensive courses didn’t deliver on their promises. Additionally, there’s a growing school of thought that with the proliferation of free online resources, paying premium fees isn’t always justified.

What’s interesting is that cultural background also comes into play. In some Asian societies, for instance, there’s a deeply ingrained belief in the transformative power of education, which drives families to make considerable sacrifices. Ultimately, it’s less about absolute wealth and more about priorities and values.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated organization:

  • Opening with “boils down to” và list factors
  • “On one end…On the flip side” → clear contrast
  • “What’s interesting is…” → adding another dimension
  • “Ultimately…” → conclusion with nuanced view

• Vocabulary: High-level và precise:

  • “boils down to” (idiom = results from)
  • “perceived value” (giá trị cảm nhận)
  • “game-changer” (metaphor = transformative factor)
  • “subscribes to the philosophy” (academic phrase)
  • “risk-averse” (technical term)
  • “proliferation of” (formal = rapid increase)
  • “ingrained belief” (collocation = deeply-held belief)

• Grammar: Complex và varied:

  • Relative clauses: “individuals who view…”, “people who’ve witnessed…”
  • Present perfect: “have witnessed”, “didn’t deliver”
  • Passive voice: “isn’t justified”
  • Cleft sentence implied: “it’s less about…and more about…”

• Critical Thinking:

  • Acknowledges multiple perspectives without bias
  • Brings in cultural dimension → shows wider knowledge
  • Nuanced conclusion (not black-and-white)
  • Uses hedging language appropriately: “typically”, “tend to”, “might”

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Well”, “On one end…On the flip side”, “Additionally”, “What’s interesting is”, “Ultimately”
• Tentative language: “I think”, “typically”, “tend to”, “might”, “perhaps” → shows sophistication, không absolute statements
• Abstract nouns: “capacity”, “mindset”, “philosophy”, “proliferation”, “priority” → academic style
• Metaphors: “game-changer”, “appreciates over time”, “school of thought” → native-like expression

---

Question 2: Do you think the government should subsidize professional training courses?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Should question (nên hay không nên)
• Key words: “government”, “subsidize” (tài trợ), “professional training”
• Cách tiếp cận:
  1. State your position (Yes/No/Partially)
  2. Explain reasons với real-world examples
  3. Acknowledge opposing view
  4. Conclude with balanced perspective

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think the government should help people pay for training courses. Many people cannot afford expensive courses, so government support would help them. This is good for the economy because more skilled workers mean better businesses. However, the government has limited money, so they should choose which courses to support carefully. Maybe they should focus on important skills that the country needs.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có position và reasons nhưng chưa elaborate deeply
• Vocabulary: Basic level (help, afford, good for, important)
• Ideas: Sensible nhưng predictable và lack specific examples
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response nhưng thiếu sophisticated argumentation và language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“I’d say this is quite a nuanced issue that requires striking a balance between social equity and fiscal responsibility. In principle, yes, I believe governments should play a role in making professional training more accessible, but with certain caveats.

The rationale behind public funding is fairly compelling. Accessible upskilling opportunities can help bridge the skills gap that many economies face, particularly in emerging industries like AI or renewable energy. By subsidizing targeted programs, governments can ensure that talent development isn’t limited to those with substantial financial resources, which promotes social mobility and reduces inequality. We’ve seen successful models in countries like Singapore, where the government’s SkillsFuture initiative provides generous credits for citizens to pursue relevant training, which has demonstrably enhanced their workforce competitiveness.

That said, I think there are legitimate concerns about blanket subsidies. Not all courses deliver equal value, and there’s a risk of misallocated resources if funding isn’t tied to labor market needs or quality standards. A more pragmatic approach might be to prioritize high-demand fields where there’s a clear skills shortage, or to use a co-funding model where individuals bear some of the cost, ensuring they have skin in the game and are genuinely committed.

At the end of the day, strategic government investment in professional training can yield significant dividends – not just for individuals but for overall economic productivity. However, it needs to be coupled with robust quality assurance and alignment with industry needs to maximize impact.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exemplary organization:

  • Opening: Acknowledges complexity + states position with qualifier
  • Para 1: Arguments FOR với reasons và real example
  • Para 2: Arguments AGAINST và suggests better approach
  • Conclusion: Balanced synthesis

• Vocabulary: Academic and sophisticated:

  • “nuanced issue” (vấn đề phức tạp)
  • “striking a balance” (tìm sự cân bằng)
  • “fiscal responsibility” (trách nhiệm tài khóa)
  • “with certain caveats” (với những điều kiện nhất định)
  • “bridge the skills gap” (collocation)
  • “blanket subsidies” (tài trợ toàn diện không phân biệt)
  • “misallocated resources” (nguồn lực bị phân bổ sai)
  • “skin in the game” (idiom = có stake cá nhân)
  • “yield significant dividends” (metaphor from finance)

• Grammar: Advanced structures:

  • Relative clauses: “that many economies face”, “where individuals bear…”
  • Present perfect: “has demonstrably enhanced”
  • Conditional: implied trong “if funding isn’t tied to…”
  • Passive: “isn’t limited to”, “be coupled with”
  • Gerunds as subjects: “Accessible upskilling opportunities can…”

• Critical Thinking:

  • Two-sided argument (for và against) → shows balanced thinking
  • Real-world example (Singapore’s SkillsFuture) → credibility
  • Proposes alternative solution (co-funding model) → problem-solving
  • Considers multiple stakeholders (individuals, government, economy)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “In principle”, “That said”, “At the end of the day”
• Hedging: “I’d say”, “I believe”, “might be”, “can help” → academic caution
• Formal expressions: “The rationale behind”, “legitimate concerns”, “pragmatic approach”

Chính phủ hỗ trợ tài trợ khóa học đào tạo nghề nghiệp cho người dân

---

Theme 2: Value and Quality of Education

Question 3: How can people evaluate whether an educational course is worth the investment?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: How question – yêu cầu explain process/methods
• Key words: “evaluate” (đánh giá), “worth the investment”
• Cách tiếp cận: List several evaluation criteria với explanations và examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“People should check several things before choosing a course. First, they should look at reviews from previous students to see if the course is good. Second, they should compare the price with other similar courses. Third, they need to think about whether the course will help them get a better job. Also, they can attend a trial class to see the teaching quality. Finally, they should check if the certificate is recognized by companies.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: List format with First/Second/Third – clear nhưng mechanical
• Vocabulary: Basic verbs (check, look at, think about)
• Ideas: Practical nhưng superficial
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers multiple points nhưng lacks elaboration và sophisticated language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“This is actually a really important question, and I think people need to be quite systematic in their approach rather than just going by recommendations or marketing materials.

First and foremost, due diligence on the credentials and track record of the institution is crucial. This means looking beyond glossy brochures to find verifiable outcomes – for instance, what percentage of graduates actually achieve their target scores or successfully transition to their desired careers? Word-of-mouth from alumni can be invaluable here, but I’d also suggest looking at independent reviews on platforms like Google or specialized education forums, where feedback tends to be more candid.

Another key consideration is the curriculum alignment with your specific needs. A course might have an excellent reputation generally, but if it doesn’t cater to your particular weak areas or testing goals, it’s not going to deliver optimal value. I think it’s worth examining the course structure, the qualification of instructors, and whether they offer personalized feedback rather than just one-size-fits-all teaching.

From a financial standpoint, cost-benefit analysis is essential. This isn’t just about comparing sticker prices – you need to factor in opportunity costs, like the time you’ll invest, and potential returns, such as salary increases or career advancement. Sometimes a more expensive course that guarantees results or offers flexible scheduling can actually be more cost-effective than a cheaper alternative that stretches over a longer period.

Finally, I’d say trial classes or money-back guarantees are excellent indicators of confidence from the provider. If an institution is willing to let you test the waters before committing, it suggests they’re genuinely confident in their service quality rather than just trying to lock in revenue.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Extremely well-organized với clear categories:

  • Opening acknowledges importance
  • Para 1: Institution credibility
  • Para 2: Curriculum fit
  • Para 3: Financial evaluation
  • Para 4: Risk mitigation

• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise:

  • “systematic approach” vs “going by” (contrast formal/informal)
  • “due diligence” (business term)
  • “verifiable outcomes” (academic phrase)
  • “word-of-mouth” (idiom)
  • “candid feedback” (collocation)
  • “one-size-fits-all” (idiom)
  • “sticker price” (idiom = advertised price)
  • “opportunity cost” (economics term)
  • “test the waters” (idiom = try cautiously)
  • “lock in revenue” (business phrasal verb)

• Grammar: Complex và natural:

  • Question form embedded: “what percentage of graduates…”
  • Conditional: “if it doesn’t cater to…, it’s not going to…”
  • Comparative: “more expensive…more cost-effective than…”
  • Present perfect: “might have an excellent reputation”
  • Gerunds: “examining the course structure”

• Critical Thinking:

  • Comprehensive coverage of evaluation criteria
  • Distinguishes between surface indicators và deeper quality measures
  • Provides specific methods (where to find reviews, what to ask)
  • Acknowledges trade-offs (expensive vs cheap, time vs money)

---

Question 4: Do you think online courses can provide the same value as in-person classes?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Comparison
• Key words: “online” vs “in-person”, “same value”
• Cách tiếp cận: Compare and contrast, acknowledge pros/cons của cả hai

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think both online and in-person classes have advantages. Online courses are convenient because you can study at home and save time on traveling. They are also usually cheaper. However, in-person classes are better for interaction with teachers and other students. You can ask questions immediately and get answers. I think it depends on the subject – some subjects are better online, while others need face-to-face teaching.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic comparison với “both…and”, “However”
• Ideas: Standard points (convenience, cost, interaction)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate comparison nhưng thiếu depth và nuanced analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“This is quite a contentious debate, and honestly, I don’t think there’s a one-size-fits-all answer – it really hinges on the nature of the course and individual learning preferences.

For skills-based or knowledge-acquisition courses, particularly those focused on IELTS or academic subjects, online formats have proven remarkably effective. The technology has evolved to a point where platforms can facilitate live interaction, breakout discussions, and even real-time feedback that rivals traditional classrooms. What’s more, online courses often leverage recorded materials, allowing students to revisit complex concepts at their own pace – something that’s not possible in a physical classroom. The asynchronous nature of many online programs also accommodates diverse schedules, which is invaluable for working professionals.

However, I’d argue that in-person learning still holds a distinct edge in certain contexts. The spontaneous interactions and social dynamics of a physical classroom can foster deeper engagement and collaborative learning in ways that virtual environments struggle to replicate. There’s also something to be said for the accountability that comes with physically showing up to class – it’s easier to get sidetracked when you’re at home. Additionally, for courses requiring hands-on practice – think language conversation classes or technical workshops – the immediacy of in-person feedback is hard to match.

Where I think we’re heading is toward a blended approach that capitalizes on the strengths of both modalities. The most forward-thinking institutions are integrating online components for theoretical foundation while reserving in-person sessions for high-touch interactions and practical applications. This hybrid model might actually surpass either format individually in terms of value delivered.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated three-part argument:

  • Opening: Acknowledges complexity
  • Para 1: Case for online với specific benefits
  • Para 2: Case for in-person với limitations của online
  • Para 3: Proposes synthesis (blended approach)

• Vocabulary: Academic và nuanced:

  • “contentious debate” (formal)
  • “hinges on” (depends critically on)
  • “knowledge-acquisition” (academic compound)
  • “proven remarkably effective” (strong collocation)
  • “rivals traditional classrooms” (sophisticated verb choice)
  • “leverage recorded materials” (business term applied to education)
  • “asynchronous nature” (technical term)
  • “holds a distinct edge” (idiom = has advantage)
  • “foster deeper engagement” (academic collocation)
  • “get sidetracked” (phrasal verb = lose focus)
  • “capitalize on” (business phrasal verb)
  • “high-touch interactions” (business term)

• Grammar: Advanced structures:

  • Cleft sentence: “What’s more, online courses…”
  • Relative clauses: “allowing students to revisit…”, “something that’s not possible…”
  • Present perfect: “have proven”, “has evolved”
  • Gerunds: “requiring hands-on practice”
  • Future prediction: “Where I think we’re heading is…”

• Critical Thinking:

  • Avoids simplistic “better/worse” judgment
  • Contextualizes comparison (depends on course type, learner type)
  • Acknowledges evolution of technology
  • Predicts future trend (blended learning)
  • Uses specific examples (IELTS, technical workshops)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Honestly”, “What’s more”, “However”, “Additionally”, “Where I think…”
• Hedging: “quite”, “often”, “might”, “I’d argue” → academic caution
• Contrastive structures: “While…also”, “However”, “On the other hand” (implied)

---

Theme 3: Future Trends in Education

Question 5: How do you think education and training will change in the next 10-20 years?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Future prediction – How will…change?
• Key words: “education and training”, “next 10-20 years”
• Cách tiếp cận:
  1. Identify current trends
  2. Extrapolate future developments
  3. Consider multiple dimensions (technology, access, content)
  4. Use future forms appropriately

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think education will change a lot because of technology. More people will study online instead of going to schools. Artificial intelligence might help teachers to teach better and give personalized lessons. Also, I think people will need to learn new skills more often because jobs are changing quickly. Virtual reality might be used in some classes to make learning more interesting. Overall, I believe education will become more flexible and technology-focused.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists several predictions nhưng không elaborate deeply
• Vocabulary: Basic future expressions (will change, might help)
• Ideas: Predictable trends (online learning, AI, VR)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses question với relevant ideas nhưng lacks sophisticated analysis và language variety

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“Well, if current trajectories are any indication, I think we’re on the cusp of a fairly radical transformation in how education is conceptualized and delivered.

First and foremost, I anticipate we’ll see a decisive shift away from the traditional front-loaded model – where you acquire education in your youth and then coast on that knowledge for decades – toward continuous, lifelong learning. The rapid pace of technological change means skills become obsolete much faster than before, so upskilling and reskilling will likely become routine aspects of everyone’s career. I’d expect to see more modular, bite-sized credentials rather than lengthy degree programs – something like stackable certificates that you accumulate throughout your working life.

On the technology front, AI is probably going to be transformative, though perhaps not in the ways people expect. Rather than replacing human instructors, I think it’ll augment them by handling routine tasks like grading or providing basic feedback, freeing up teachers to focus on higher-order thinking and mentorship. We’re already seeing adaptive learning platforms that tailor content to individual learning speeds and styles – this personalization will likely become far more sophisticated, essentially giving everyone a customized curriculum.

I also think there’ll be a blurring of boundaries between formal and informal learning. With the proliferation of high-quality free resources – from YouTube tutorials to open courseware from top universities – the credential itself might matter less than demonstrable skills. We might see more emphasis on portfolio-based assessment rather than exams, and competency-based progression rather than time-based degree requirements.

That said, I hope we don’t lose sight of the irreplaceable value of human connection in education. The most effective learning often happens through discourse, debate, and collaboration – elements that are challenging to replicate purely through technology. The ideal scenario would be one where technological advances democratize access to quality education globally while still preserving those crucial interpersonal dimensions of learning.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Comprehensive và sophisticated:

  • Opening: Sets context với current trends
  • Para 1: Shift in learning paradigm (continuous learning)
  • Para 2: Technology impact (AI augmentation)
  • Para 3: Changes in credentialing and assessment
  • Conclusion: Balanced view acknowledging limitations

• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated:

  • “on the cusp of” (idiom = on the verge of)
  • “radical transformation” (strong collocation)
  • “front-loaded model” (technical term)
  • “coast on that knowledge” (phrasal verb = rely on without updating)
  • “become obsolete” (formal verb)
  • “stackable certificates” (education jargon)
  • “augment them” (formal = enhance)
  • “higher-order thinking” (educational psychology term)
  • “adaptive learning platforms” (technical term)
  • “blurring of boundaries” (metaphorical expression)
  • “proliferation of” (formal = rapid increase)
  • “demonstrable skills” (formal adjective)
  • “competency-based progression” (education jargon)
  • “democratize access” (sophisticated verb use)

• Grammar: Advanced và varied:

  • Future forms variety: “we’re on the cusp”, “I anticipate we’ll see”, “will likely become”, “is probably going to be”, “might matter less”
  • Conditional: “if current trajectories are any indication”
  • Rather than structure: “Rather than replacing…, I think it’ll augment…”
  • Present continuous for future: “we’re already seeing”
  • Passive voice: “is conceptualized and delivered”

• Critical Thinking:

  • Multi-dimensional analysis (paradigm shift, technology, assessment)
  • Nuanced view of AI (augment not replace)
  • Acknowledges potential downsides
  • Specific examples and terminology showing expertise
  • Predicts concrete changes with reasoning

💡 Key Language Features:

• Future expressions variety:

  • “I anticipate we’ll see…” (formal prediction)
  • “is probably going to be…” (confident prediction)
  • “I’d expect to see…” (personal forecast)
  • “will likely become…” (probable future)
  • “might matter less…” (possible future)

• Discourse markers: “First and foremost”, “On the technology front”, “That said”, “The ideal scenario”

• Hedging appropriately: “fairly”, “probably”, “perhaps”, “likely”, “might” → shows academic caution about predictions

Tương lai giáo dục với công nghệ AI và học tập trực tuyến cá nhân hóa

---

Question 6: Is it better to specialize in one field or have knowledge in multiple areas?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Compare two approaches
• Key words: “specialize” vs “multiple areas”, “better”
• Cách tiếp cận: Discuss both sides, consider contexts where each is valuable

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7-8:

“This is an interesting question and I think the answer depends on your career goals. Specialization has clear advantages – experts in specific fields like medicine or engineering usually earn high salaries and are very respected. They have deep knowledge that takes years to develop. However, having diverse knowledge can also be valuable in today’s world. Many companies look for people who can work across different areas and solve complex problems. I personally think a balance is best – having one main area of expertise but also understanding related fields.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Good organization với “depends on”, consideration of both sides, personal conclusion
• Vocabulary: Appropriate với some good phrases (clear advantages, diverse knowledge, area of expertise)
• Ideas: Balanced và relevant
• Tại sao Band 7-8: Well-developed response với reasonable depth nhưng có thể more sophisticated

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“This question really gets to the heart of an ongoing debate in career development, and I think the optimal answer has evolved considerably over time.

Traditionally, the conventional wisdom was that specialization was the surest path to professional success. The logic was fairly straightforward – becoming a deep expert in a narrow domain meant you’d be virtually irreplaceable and could command premium compensation. This model still holds true in certain fields – you wouldn’t want a neurosurgeon who also dabbles in marketing, for instance. That depth of expertise requires years of focused study and practice that simply isn’t compatible with divided attention.

However, I’d argue that we’re increasingly moving toward a T-shaped skills model – where you have profound depth in one area (the vertical stroke of the T) but also sufficient breadth across related disciplines (the horizontal stroke). This hybrid approach has become particularly valued in knowledge economy sectors. For example, a data scientist who understands not just the technical algorithms but also business strategy and communication can bridge gaps between technical and non-technical teams in ways that a pure specialist cannot.

What’s driving this shift is the interconnected nature of modern problems. Many of today’s most pressing challenges – climate change, healthcare innovation, technological ethics – are inherently interdisciplinary and require people who can synthesize insights from multiple domains. We’ve also seen that cross-pollination of ideas between fields often sparks innovation – some of the most breakthrough concepts come from applying frameworks from one discipline to another.

My personal take is that the ideal strategy is sequential rather than simultaneous – build genuine expertise in one domain first, which gives you credibility and a solid foundation, then strategically expand into complementary areas. This way you’re not a jack of all trades, master of none, but rather someone with a strong core competence and meaningful adjacent knowledge.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exemplary sophistication:

  • Opening: Frames as evolving debate
  • Para 1: Traditional specialization argument với specific example
  • Para 2: Introduces T-shaped model với explanation
  • Para 3: Explains why this shift is happening
  • Conclusion: Personal synthesis với practical advice

• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated:

  • “gets to the heart of” (idiom)
  • “conventional wisdom” (phrase)
  • “surest path” (formal collocation)
  • “command premium compensation” (business expression)
  • “holds true” (formal phrase)
  • “divided attention” (psychological term)
  • “T-shaped skills” (business/HR jargon)
  • “profound depth” và “sufficient breadth” (contrasting academic phrases)
  • “bridge gaps” (metaphor)
  • “pure specialist” (precise descriptor)
  • “interconnected nature” (academic phrase)
  • “cross-pollination” (biological metaphor applied to ideas)
  • “sparks innovation” (vivid verb choice)
  • “jack of all trades, master of none” (complete idiom)
  • “adjacent knowledge” (precise terminology)

• Grammar: Complex và error-free:

  • Passive constructions: “is valued”, “are driven”
  • Conditional perfect: “you wouldn’t want a surgeon who…”
  • Relative clauses: “a data scientist who understands…”, “people who can synthesize…”
  • Comparative: “increasingly moving toward…”
  • Gerunds: “becoming a deep expert”, “applying frameworks”
  • Not just…but also structure

• Critical Thinking:

  • Historical perspective (traditional → modern)
  • Contextualizes when each approach is appropriate
  • Identifies driving forces behind change
  • Provides specific examples (neurosurgeon, data scientist)
  • Offers practical synthesis rather than simplistic “one is better”
  • Acknowledges complexity và interdisciplinarity

💡 Key Language Features:

• Sophisticated discourse markers: “Traditionally”, “However”, “What’s driving this”, “My personal take”
• Contrastive structures: “not just…but also”, “rather than”, “some…others”
• Hedging: “I’d argue”, “I think”, “tends to”, “can” → academic caution
• Metaphorical language: “T-shaped”, “cross-pollination”, “bridge gaps”, “sparks”

---

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
enroll in	phrasal v	/ɪnˈrəʊl ɪn/	ghi danh, đăng ký vào	I enrolled in an intensive IELTS course last month.	enroll in a program/course/class, be enrolled in
comprehensive curriculum	n phrase	/ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv kəˈrɪkjələm/	chương trình học toàn diện	The course offers a comprehensive curriculum covering all skills.	develop/design/offer a comprehensive curriculum
personalized feedback	n phrase	/ˈpɜːsənəlaɪzd ˈfiːdbæk/	phản hồi cá nhân hóa	Students receive personalized feedback on their speaking performance.	provide/receive/give personalized feedback
worthwhile investment	n phrase	/ˌwɜːθˈwaɪl ɪnˈvestmənt/	khoản đầu tư xứng đáng	Education is a worthwhile investment in your future.	make/consider a worthwhile investment
dedicate time to	phrasal v	/ˈdedɪkeɪt taɪm tuː/	dành thời gian cho	I dedicate two hours daily to English practice.	dedicate time/resources/effort to something
pivotal decision	n phrase	/ˈpɪvətl dɪˈsɪʒn/	quyết định then chốt	Taking that course was a pivotal decision in my career.	make a pivotal decision, pivotal moment/role
at a crossroads	idiom	/ət ə ˈkrɒsrəʊdz/	ở ngã rẽ quan trọng	I was at a crossroads in my professional life.	be at/reach a crossroads, career crossroads
reach a plateau	idiom	/riːtʃ ə pləˈtəʊ/	đạt đến ngưỡng trì trệ	My English skills had reached a plateau.	reach/hit a plateau, plateau in progress/growth
barrier	n	/ˈbæriə(r)/	rào cản, trở ngại	Language proficiency was the main barrier to advancement.	main/major barrier, overcome/remove a barrier, barrier to entry/success
play a role in	phrase	/pleɪ ə rəʊl ɪn/	đóng vai trò trong	Several factors played a role in my decision.	play a key/crucial/significant role in
long-term investment	n phrase	/lɒŋ tɜːm ɪnˈvestmənt/	đầu tư dài hạn	I viewed the course as a long-term investment.	make/consider a long-term investment, long-term strategy/benefit
substantially	adv	/səbˈstænʃəli/	đáng kể, nhiều	The course fee was substantially higher than others.	substantially increase/improve/reduce, substantially different
instrumental in	adj phrase	/ˌɪnstrəˈmentl ɪn/	đóng vai trò quan trọng trong	The training was instrumental in my career change.	be instrumental in doing something, play an instrumental role
upfront cost	n phrase	/ˌʌpˈfrʌnt kɒst/	chi phí ban đầu	The upfront cost was significant but worthwhile.	upfront payment/fee/investment, pay upfront costs
return on investment	n phrase	/rɪˈtɜːn ɒn ɪnˈvestmənt/	lợi nhuận đầu tư (ROI)	The return on investment exceeded my expectations.	calculate/maximize return on investment, high/low ROI
due diligence	n phrase	/djuː ˈdɪlɪdʒəns/	sự thẩm định kỹ lưỡng	Conduct due diligence before choosing a course.	conduct/perform/do due diligence, due diligence process
track record	n phrase	/træk ˈrekɔːd/	thành tích, hồ sơ thành công	Check the institution’s track record with past students.	proven/strong/excellent track record, track record of success
cutting-edge	adj	/ˈkʌtɪŋ edʒ/	tiên tiến, hiện đại nhất	The course uses cutting-edge teaching methodologies.	cutting-edge technology/research/approach, at the cutting edge of
facilitate	v	/fəˈsɪlɪteɪt/	tạo điều kiện, hỗ trợ	Technology facilitates personalized learning experiences.	facilitate access/communication/learning, facilitate a process
demonstrable	adj	/dɪˈmɒnstrəbl/	có thể chứng minh	Employers want demonstrable English proficiency.	demonstrable evidence/results/skills, demonstrable impact

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
set me back	khiến tôi tốn (tiền)	The VIP course set me back nearly $1,000.	8-9
nothing to sneeze at	không phải số nhỏ, đáng kể	The course fee was nothing to sneeze at for a student.	8-9
tip the scales	quyết định cuối cùng, nghiêng về	The positive reviews tipped the scales in favor of enrolling.	8-9
give me an edge	cho tôi lợi thế	Personalized coaching gave me an edge over other candidates.	7.5-9
open doors to	mở ra cơ hội	The certificate opened doors to international companies.	7-9
game-changer	yếu tố thay đổi cục diện	Quality education can be a real game-changer for careers.	7.5-9
boil down to	quy về, tóm lại là	The decision boils down to your priorities and budget.	8-9
stretch one’s budget	làm căng ngân sách	The premium course really stretched my budget.	7.5-9
weigh against	cân nhắc, so sánh với	You need to weigh the cost against potential benefits.	7.5-9
recoup the cost	hoàn vốn	I recouped the course cost through my salary increase.	8-9
on the cusp of	trên bờ vực, sắp xảy ra	We’re on the cusp of a major transformation in education.	8-9
get to the heart of	đi vào trọng tâm	This question gets to the heart of the education debate.	8-9
jack of all trades, master of none	biết nhiều thứ nhưng không tinh	Don’t be a jack of all trades – specialize first.	7.5-9
strike a balance	tìm sự cân bằng	We need to strike a balance between cost and quality.	7.5-9
skin in the game	có cổ phần, có lợi ích trong vấn đề	Co-funding ensures students have skin in the game.	8-9

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ ngắn hoặc muốn hedge response
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra thông tin khác với expected hoặc add nuance
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi muốn nói thẳng thắn, genuine
• 📝 I’d say that… – Formal cách đưa ra opinion
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Academic cách nói quan điểm
• 📝 In my view,… – Tương tự “I think” nhưng formal hơn

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó (informal hơn “In addition”)
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, thêm nữa
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
• 📝 Additionally,… – Formal way to add information
• 📝 Furthermore,… – Rất formal, suitable cho Part 3

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Classic contrast structure
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Acknowledge một side rồi present another
• 📝 That said,… – Tuy nhiên (để introduce contrasting point after agreement)
• 📝 Having said that,… – Tương tự “That said”

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại (informal)
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì (idiom, quite informal)
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng (formal)
• 📝 Looking at it from a broader perspective,… – Nhìn từ góc độ rộng hơn

Để clarify hoặc elaborate:

• 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là
• 📝 To put it another way,… – Nói cách khác
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác (formal hơn)

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

• Mixed conditional (Type 2 + Type 3):

  • Formula: If + Past Simple, Subject + would + Present Perfect
  • Ví dụ: “If I hadn’t enrolled in that course, I wouldn’t have the job I have now.”

• Inversion with conditional:

  • Formula: Should/Were/Had + Subject + Verb
  • Ví dụ: “Had I known about the scholarship, I would have applied earlier.”
  • Ví dụ: “Were I to choose again, I’d still invest in that course.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

• Non-defining relative clause:

  • Formula: Noun, which/who + clause, verb
  • Ví dụ: “The IELTS Advantage course, which costs around $800, includes personalized coaching.”
  • Note: Dùng comma, không dùng “that”

• Reduced relative clause:

  • Formula: Noun + V-ing/V-ed
  • Ví dụ: “Students seeking high band scores often invest in premium courses.”
  • Ví dụ: “The certificate obtained from this course is internationally recognized.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

• Impersonal passive (formal academic style):

  • It is thought/believed/said that…
  • Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that quality education requires significant investment.”
  • Ví dụ: “It has been demonstrated that personalized feedback improves outcomes.”

• Passive with reporting verbs:

  • Ví dụ: “The course is said to have excellent success rates.”
  • Ví dụ: “This institution is known for producing high-scoring students.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

• What-cleft (emphasize object/action):

  • Formula: What + Subject + Verb + is/was + emphasized part
  • Ví dụ: “What I find most valuable is the personalized attention from instructors.”
  • Ví dụ: “What really matters is the return on investment, not just the upfront cost.”

• It-cleft (emphasize subject/time/reason):

  • Formula: It + is/was + emphasized part + that/who + rest
  • Ví dụ: “It was the comprehensive curriculum that attracted me to this course.”
  • Ví dụ: “It’s the quality of teaching that makes the difference, not the price.”

5. Advanced Conjunctions:

• Despite/In spite of + noun/gerund:

  • Ví dụ: “Despite the high cost, many students consider it worthwhile.”
  • Ví dụ: “In spite of being expensive, the course offers excellent value.”

• Whereas/While (contrast):

  • Ví dụ: “Some courses focus on test strategies, whereas others emphasize comprehensive skill-building.”

6. Inversion for emphasis:

• Not only…but also (with inversion):

  • Ví dụ: “Not only does the course improve your IELTS score, but it also builds confidence.”

• Rarely/Seldom/Never (with inversion):

  • Ví dụ: “Rarely have I seen such dedicated instructors.”
  • Ví dụ: “Seldom do students regret investing in quality education.”

Người học thành công sau khi hoàn thành khóa học IELTS VIP đạt band điểm cao

---

Việc đầu tư vào các khóa học IELTS chất lượng cao như IELTS Advantage VIP Course là một quyết định quan trọng đòi hỏi sự cân nhắc kỹ lưỡng. Như đã phân tích qua các sample answers từ Band 6 đến Band 9, điểm khác biệt không chỉ nằm ở vocabulary hay grammar, mà còn ở khả năng phân tích sâu sắc, tư duy phản biện, và diễn đạt ý tưởng một cách tinh tế.

Khi chuẩn bị cho IELTS Speaking, hãy nhớ rằng Examiners không đánh giá bạn dựa trên việc bạn có ý kiến gì, mà là cách bạn express và support ý kiến đó. Sử dụng các strategies và vocabulary trong bài viết này một cách tự nhiên, không học thuộc template. Thực hành với actual questions, record yourself, và tự đánh giá theo band descriptors.

Chúc bạn đạt band điểm như mong muốn trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking sắp tới!