IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe a Person Who Often Appears in the News Whom You Would Like to Meet” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Mở bài

Chủ đề “Describe A Person Who Often Appears In The News Whom You Would Like To Meet” là một trong những đề bài phổ biến và thách thức trong IELTS Speaking Part 2. Đây là dạng câu hỏi mô tả người nổi tiếng, yêu cầu thí sinh kết hợp khả năng miêu tả nhân vật công chúng với việc giải thích lý do cá nhân tại sao muốn gặp họ.

Theo thống kê từ các trung tâm thi IELTS trên toàn cầu, chủ đề về người nổi tiếng hoặc người xuất hiện trên truyền thông xuất hiện với tần suất khá cao, khoảng 15-20% trong các kỳ thi từ năm 2022 đến 2024. Đề bài này đặc biệt phổ biến vào quý 2 và quý 4 hàng năm. Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai vẫn ở mức cao do tính thời sự và sự liên quan đến đời sống xã hội.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được:

• 10 câu hỏi thường gặp trong Part 1 về chủ đề tin tức và người nổi tiếng
• Phân tích chi tiết cue card với bài mẫu đầy đủ cho 3 band điểm: 6-7, 7.5-8, và 8.5-9
• 8 câu hỏi thảo luận sâu trong Part 3 với câu trả lời mẫu theo từng band điểm
• Hơn 50 từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm với phát âm, nghĩa và ví dụ cụ thể
• Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của examiner với hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm
• Những lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục
• Kỹ thuật sử dụng discourse markers và cấu trúc ngữ pháp phức tạp để đạt band cao

---

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút, là phần giới thiệu và phỏng vấn ban đầu. Examiner sẽ hỏi các câu hỏi về đời sống hàng ngày, sở thích cá nhân, công việc, học tập và những chủ đề quen thuộc. Đối với chủ đề tin tức và người nổi tiếng, câu hỏi thường xoay quanh thói quen đọc báo, quan điểm về truyền thông và sự quan tâm đến các nhân vật công chúng.

Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả:

• Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi trong 1-2 câu đầu tiên
• Mở rộng ý bằng cách đưa ra lý do, ví dụ hoặc chi tiết bổ sung
• Mỗi câu trả lời nên dài 2-4 câu, tránh trả lời quá ngắn hoặc quá dài
• Sử dụng từ vựng đa dạng nhưng tự nhiên, không cố gắng nhồi nhét từ khó

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời chỉ Yes/No mà không giải thích thêm
• Sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “bad”, “interesting” mà không có từ đồng nghĩa
• Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
• Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm, thiếu tự nhiên
• Lặp lại cấu trúc câu giống nhau cho tất cả các câu hỏi

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you often read or watch the news?

Question 2: What kind of news are you most interested in?

Question 3: How do you usually get your news?

Question 4: Do you think it’s important to keep up with current events?

Question 5: Are there any famous people you particularly admire?

Question 6: Do you follow any celebrities on social media?

Question 7: Have you ever met anyone famous in person?

Question 8: Do you think the news media gives us accurate information?

Question 9: How has the way people get news changed in recent years?

Question 10: Do you prefer reading news online or in newspapers?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

---

Question: Do you often read or watch the news?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời có hay không một cách trực tiếp
• Giải thích tần suất cụ thể (daily, weekly, occasionally)
• Đưa ra lý do hoặc nguồn tin bạn thường sử dụng

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I watch the news quite regularly, usually in the evening after dinner. I prefer watching TV news because it’s more convenient and I can see the pictures and videos. I think it’s important to know what’s happening in the world.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời rõ ràng, có đề cập thời gian cụ thể, đưa ra lý do
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (quite regularly, convenient), cấu trúc câu cơ bản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời đủ thông tin và mạch lạc, nhưng thiếu từ vựng nâng cao và không có chi tiết cụ thể về loại tin tức hay nguồn tin chính xác

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’d say I’m fairly diligent about keeping up with current affairs, typically scrolling through news apps during my morning commute and catching up on major headlines before bed. I tend to gravitate towards reputable sources like BBC or The Guardian because I value well-researched journalism over sensationalized content. It’s become somewhat of a routine that helps me stay informed and engaged with what’s happening both locally and globally.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Từ vựng tinh vi (diligent, gravitate towards, well-researched journalism, sensationalized), cấu trúc câu phức tạp với nhiều mệnh đề, thông tin cụ thể về nguồn tin và thói quen cá nhân, thể hiện sự suy nghĩ chín chắn về chất lượng thông tin
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Câu trả lời trôi chảy với discourse marker “I’d say”, không có hesitation
  • Vocabulary: Sử dụng collocations tự nhiên (keep up with current affairs, major headlines, reputable sources)
  • Grammar: Kết hợp nhiều cấu trúc: present simple, present continuous, mệnh đề quan hệ rút gọn
  • Pronunciation: Các từ như “diligent”, “gravitate” thể hiện khả năng phát âm từ nâng cao

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• keep up with current affairs: theo dõi thời sự
• gravitate towards: có xu hướng nghiêng về, ưa thích
• well-researched journalism: báo chí có nghiên cứu kỹ lưỡng
• sensationalized content: nội dung giật gân, phóng đại
• informed and engaged: được thông tin và tham gia tích cực

---

Question: What kind of news are you most interested in?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu rõ thể loại tin tức cụ thể
• Giải thích tại sao bạn quan tâm đến loại tin đó
• Có thể so sánh với các loại tin khác hoặc đưa ra ví dụ

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I’m mainly interested in technology news because I work in IT and I need to know about new developments. I also like sports news, especially about football. I don’t really follow political news much because it’s sometimes boring and complicated.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có sự phân loại rõ ràng, đưa ra lý do liên quan đến công việc
• Hạn chế: Từ “boring” và “complicated” quá đơn giản, thiếu depth trong giải thích, không có ví dụ cụ thể
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Nội dung adequate nhưng thiếu sophisticated vocabulary và detailed explanation

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’m particularly drawn to science and technology news, especially stories about breakthrough innovations in artificial intelligence and renewable energy. Given my background in engineering, I find it intellectually stimulating to follow how these advancements might reshape our daily lives. That said, I also make a point of reading human interest stories because they provide a more nuanced perspective on how global events impact ordinary people. I tend to steer clear of celebrity gossip though – it strikes me as rather superficial compared to issues of genuine substance.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary phong phú và precise (drawn to, breakthrough innovations, intellectually stimulating, reshape, nuanced perspective, steer clear of, superficial, genuine substance), grammar đa dạng với mệnh đề phụ, relative clauses, thể hiện critical thinking khi so sánh các loại tin và giải thích preference, sử dụng discourse markers tự nhiên (That said, though)
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Câu trả lời dài, detailed và well-organized với clear progression of ideas
  • Vocabulary: Sophisticated word choices và natural collocations
  • Grammar: Complex structures bao gồm adverbial clauses, noun phrases
  • Ideas: Demonstrates depth of thought và ability to contrast different types of news

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• be drawn to: bị thu hút bởi
• breakthrough innovations: những đổi mới đột phá
• intellectually stimulating: kích thích trí tuệ
• reshape our daily lives: định hình lại cuộc sống hàng ngày
• nuanced perspective: góc nhìn tinh tế, nhiều chiều
• steer clear of: tránh xa
• genuine substance: nội dung thực chất, có giá trị

---

Question: How do you usually get your news?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Liệt kê các phương tiện/nền tảng cụ thể
• So sánh ưu nhược điểm của các phương thức
• Có thể đề cập sự thay đổi thói quen theo thời gian

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I usually get my news from my phone, mainly through news apps and social media. I think it’s faster than reading newspapers. Sometimes I watch TV news when I’m at home. I rarely buy newspapers anymore because everything is available online for free.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Đề cập nhiều nguồn khác nhau, có so sánh giữa online và traditional media
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary basic (faster, available, for free), thiếu detail về specific apps hoặc preferences, không elaborate về reasons
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate content nhưng lacks sophistication trong expression và depth of explanation

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’ve completely transitioned to digital platforms for my news consumption – primarily through curated news aggregators like Flipboard and Apple News, which allow me to customize my feed according to my interests. I also subscribe to newsletters from publications like The Economist for in-depth analysis rather than just surface-level reporting. While social media does pop up in my news diet, I’m quite discerning about which sources I trust, as there’s an overwhelming amount of misinformation circulating online. I suppose I’ve become more selective and critical in how I consume news compared to years ago when I’d simply accept whatever was on traditional TV broadcasts.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Highly specific về platforms và strategies, sophisticated vocabulary (transitioned, curated, aggregators, customize, in-depth analysis, surface-level, discerning, overwhelming, misinformation), grammar đa dạng với relative clauses, comparative structures, adverbial clauses, demonstrates critical thinking về media literacy và changes over time, natural discourse markers (While, I suppose)
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Extended response với smooth transitions between ideas
  • Vocabulary: Precise và topic-specific terminology
  • Grammar: Wide range of complex structures used accurately
  • Ideas: Shows sophisticated understanding of modern media landscape và personal evolution

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• transition to digital platforms: chuyển sang nền tảng kỹ thuật số
• curated news aggregators: các trang tổng hợp tin tức được tuyển chọn
• customize my feed: tùy chỉnh nguồn cấp tin
• in-depth analysis: phân tích chuyên sâu
• surface-level reporting: đưa tin ở mức độ bề mặt
• discerning about: có nhãn quan, sáng suốt về
• overwhelming amount of misinformation: lượng thông tin sai lệch quá tải

Học viên Việt Nam luyện tập IELTS Speaking Part 1 về chủ đề tin tức và người nổi tiếng

---

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại (long turn) kéo dài 3-4 phút, bao gồm 1 phút chuẩn bị và 2-3 phút trình bày không bị gián đoạn. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để thể hiện khả năng nói liên tục, tổ chức ý tưởng logic và sử dụng ngôn ngữ phong phú.

Chiến lược chuẩn bị hiệu quả:

• Sử dụng trọn vẹn 1 phút để ghi chú keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Ghi từ khóa theo từng bullet point của đề bài
• Lên kế hoạch thời gian: khoảng 30 giây cho mỗi bullet point, 45-60 giây cho phần “explain”
• Nghĩ trước về opening sentence và conclusion sentence

Kỹ thuật nói đạt điểm cao:

• Nói đủ 2 phút (tối thiểu 1.5 phút), sử dụng hết thời gian được phép
• Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points theo thứ tự
• Sử dụng past tenses nếu đề bài về sự kiện đã xảy ra, present tenses nếu về người/vật hiện tại
• Thêm chi tiết cụ thể, ví dụ, cảm xúc cá nhân
• Sử dụng discourse markers để kết nối ý (To begin with, Moreover, What makes this person special is…)

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Không sử dụng đủ thời gian chuẩn bị, vội vàng bắt đầu nói
• Nói dưới 1.5 phút, kết thúc quá sớm
• Bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points
• Nói chung chung, thiếu specific details
• Lặp lại ý tưởng thay vì phát triển sâu
• Lo lắng quá mức về pronunciation dẫn đến mất tự nhiên

Cue Card

Describe a person who often appears in the news whom you would like to meet

You should say:

• Who this person is
• How you know about this person / How often you see this person in the news
• What this person does / Why this person appears in the news
• And explain why you would like to meet this person

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person (mô tả một người)

Thì động từ chính: Present simple (vì người này vẫn còn sống và vẫn xuất hiện trên tin tức) kết hợp present perfect (để nói về kinh nghiệm biết đến người này)

Bullet points phải cover:

1. Who this person is: Tên, nghề nghiệp, vai trò trong xã hội, quốc tịch
2. How you know / How often you see: Nguồn tin tức, tần suất xuất hiện, kể từ khi nào
3. What they do / Why they appear: Thành tựu, đóng góp, lý do nổi tiếng, các sự kiện liên quan
4. Explain why you want to meet: Đây là phần quan trọng nhất, cần elaborate về personal reasons, values bạn admire, questions bạn muốn hỏi, impact họ có trên bạn

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần giải thích chiếm khoảng 40% thời gian nói (45-60 giây), đây là nơi bạn demonstrate critical thinking, personal reflection và sophisticated language. Đừng chỉ nói “because I admire them” mà phải explain cụ thể what qualities, how they inspire you, what you hope to learn.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

“The person I’d like to talk about is Elon Musk. He’s a very famous businessman and entrepreneur who appears in the news almost every day.

I first heard about him maybe five or six years ago when he started making electric cars with Tesla. Now I see him in the news very often, especially on social media platforms like Twitter, which he actually owns now. He appears in the news because he does many interesting things, like sending rockets to space with his company SpaceX, and he also talks about artificial intelligence and other technologies.

I know about him mainly through online news and YouTube videos. Many technology channels make videos about his companies and his plans. He’s very active on social media, so it’s easy to follow what he’s doing.

I would really like to meet him because I think he’s a very interesting person. He has achieved many things that people said were impossible, like making electric cars popular and creating reusable rockets. I admire his ability to think differently and take big risks. If I could meet him, I would ask him about his way of thinking and how he solves difficult problems. I think I could learn a lot from talking to someone who has done so many amazing things. He also seems to care about the future of humanity, which I find inspiring.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Nói khá trôi chảy với một số hesitation nhẹ, có sử dụng linking words cơ bản (because, also, so, like), tổ chức ý tưởng logic nhưng còn đơn giản
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng đủ dùng và appropriate (entrepreneur, artificial intelligence, reusable rockets) nhưng chủ yếu là common words, có một số collocations (take big risks, think differently)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Sử dụng mix của simple và complex sentences, có relative clauses (which he actually owns, who has done), present perfect (has achieved), conditional (If I could meet) nhưng không quá đa dạng
Pronunciation	6-7	Rõ ràng và dễ hiểu, có thể có một số lỗi nhỏ về pronunciation của từ phức tạp nhưng không ảnh hưởng communication

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points theo thứ tự logic
• ✅ Có specific examples (Tesla, SpaceX, Twitter)
• ✅ Giải thích lý do muốn gặp với personal perspective
• ✅ Độ dài phù hợp, nội dung cohesive

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary chưa sophisticated, nhiều từ basic (very famous, interesting, amazing)
• ⚠️ Thiếu idioms hoặc advanced expressions
• ⚠️ Phần explain chưa đủ deep, chưa có emotional connection mạnh
• ⚠️ Grammar structures tương đối simple, chưa có inversion hay cleft sentences

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

“I’d like to talk about Greta Thunberg, the Swedish environmental activist who has become a household name in recent years.

I first came across her story around 2019 when she gained international prominence for her school strike for climate movement. Since then, she’s been a regular feature in major news outlets – I’d say I see articles or reports about her at least once or twice a week, whether it’s about her speeches at international conferences, her participation in climate protests, or her criticism of world leaders’ inaction on climate change.

What makes her newsworthy is her unwavering commitment to environmental activism despite her young age. She started by protesting alone outside the Swedish parliament when she was just fifteen, and has since mobilized millions of young people worldwide through the Fridays for Future movement. She’s known for her remarkably articulate and often hard-hitting speeches at venues like the UN Climate Summit, where she famously challenged world leaders with her “How dare you?” speech. Beyond protests, she’s also leveraged her platform to promote sustainable living and raise awareness about the urgency of the climate crisis.

The reason I’d love to meet her is multifaceted. Firstly, I’m deeply impressed by her courage – at an age when most teenagers are focused on social media and entertainment, she’s taken on one of humanity’s greatest challenges. Her ability to cut through political rhetoric and speak truth to power is something I find genuinely inspiring. I’d be curious to understand what drives her resilience, especially given the enormous pressure and criticism she faces from climate change deniers. I’d also want to discuss practical ways that ordinary people like myself can make a meaningful impact, because sometimes the problem feels so overwhelming that it’s hard to know where to start. Meeting her would be an opportunity to learn from someone who has demonstrated that individual action can spark global movements.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Trôi chảy, ít hesitation, sử dụng nhiều discourse markers sophisticated (Firstly, Beyond, The reason is multifaceted), ý tưởng được phát triển logic và coherent
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Từ vựng phong phú với collocations tự nhiên (household name, gained prominence, unwavering commitment, hard-hitting speeches, leverage platform, cut through rhetoric), paraphrasing hiệu quả
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Đa dạng structures: relative clauses, passive voice (has been mobilized), present perfect continuous, complex noun phrases, conditional sentences, ít lỗi
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Rõ ràng, natural stress và intonation, phát âm chính xác các từ academic (multifaceted, resilience, rhetoric)

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“very famous businessman”, “interesting things”, “amazing things”	“household name”, “gained international prominence”, “unwavering commitment”, “hard-hitting speeches”
Grammar	Simple structures: “He does many interesting things”, “I think he’s interesting”	Complex structures: “What makes her newsworthy is…”, “at an age when most teenagers are…”, “demonstrated that individual action can spark”
Ideas	Surface-level: “he has achieved many things”, “care about future”	In-depth: specific examples của speeches và movements, multifaceted explanation với personal reflection
Coherence	Basic linking (because, also, so)	Sophisticated markers (Firstly, Beyond, especially given, The reason is multifaceted)

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

“The individual I’m keen to discuss is Jacinda Ardern, who, until her recent resignation, served as New Zealand’s Prime Minister and has been a prominent figure in international news over the past several years.

I initially became aware of her leadership during the tragic Christchurch mosque shootings in 2019, when her remarkably empathetic response and swift action on gun control laws captured global attention. Since then, I’ve been following her trajectory quite closely through various reputable news sources – she’s been featured prominently not just for her political decisions but also for her distinctive leadership style that sets her apart from conventional politicians. Whether it’s her deft handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, where New Zealand became something of a model nation for virus suppression, or her groundbreaking decision to prioritize wellbeing over GDP in economic policy, she consistently appears in international media, I’d estimate several times a month.

What catapults her into the news isn’t merely her political position but rather the progressive and compassionate approach she brings to governance. She’s shattered stereotypes about what leadership looks like – juggling the demands of being a head of government while being a mother to a young child, something virtually unprecedented at her level. Her communication style is particularly noteworthy; she has this rare ability to convey complex policy decisions in accessible language while never coming across as condescending. During crises, whether they’re national tragedies or natural disasters, she’s demonstrated a level of emotional intelligence that’s refreshingly authentic in today’s often cynical political landscape. Moreover, she’s been a vocal advocate for addressing climate change, gender equality, and indigenous rights – issues that resonate deeply with my own values.

As for why I’m eager to meet her, it goes beyond mere admiration of her policies. I’m fascinated by the psychology of principled leadership – how does one maintain integrity and compassion in an environment that often rewards ruthlessness? I’d want to delve into her decision-making process, particularly those moments when taking the moral high ground might have been politically expedient to compromise. Having witnessed how she’s navigated criticism and the immense pressures of leadership, I’m curious about the personal toll such positions exact and how she maintains a sense of perspective. On a more practical level, as someone who believes young people need to be more engaged in civic life, I’d seek her insights on how to bridge the gap between political discourse and youth participation. Perhaps most importantly, in an era where many feel disillusioned with politics, meeting someone who has demonstrated that governance can be both effective and compassionate would be profoundly inspiring. It would be an opportunity to learn not just about politics, but about maintaining one’s humanity in positions of power – a lesson that transcends any particular field or career.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Hoàn toàn fluent và coherent, không có noticeable hesitation, ý tưởng sophisticated và well-developed, progression logic từ facts → analysis → personal reflection, sử dụng sophisticated cohesive devices
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Vocabulary range rộng và precise, idiomatic expressions natural (sets her apart, juggling demands, taking moral high ground, bridge the gap), collocations sophisticated và accurate, paraphrasing skillful
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range của structures: cleft sentences, inversion, mixed conditionals, participle clauses, complex noun phrases, virtually error-free
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Native-like pronunciation với appropriate stress, rhythm và intonation, effortless delivery của từ phức tạp

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:

• Không có hesitation hay self-correction, speech flows naturally như một presentation được prepare kỹ
• Transitions giữa các ý seamless với sophisticated markers
• Pacing appropriate, không quá nhanh hay chậm

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• “captured global attention” thay vì “became famous” – natural collocation
• “deft handling” thay vì “good management” – more precise và sophisticated
• “catapults her into the news” – vivid imagery verb thay vì “makes her appear”
• “shattered stereotypes” – powerful collocation thay vì “broke stereotypes”
• “refreshingly authentic” – adverb + adjective combination shows lexical range
• “politically expedient” – specialized vocabulary trong politics context

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Cleft sentence: “What catapults her into the news isn’t merely…” – emphasizes key point
• Participle clause: “Having witnessed how she’s navigated…” – shows cause-effect relationship
• Relative clause với “where”: “an environment that often rewards ruthlessness”
• Noun phrase phức tạp: “her remarkably empathetic response and swift action”
• Gerund as subject: “juggling the demands” – varied sentence openings
• Rhetorical question: “how does one maintain integrity…” – engagement technique

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:

• Không chỉ describe mà còn analyze tại sao người này significant
• Connects personal values với leadership qualities
• Demonstrates critical thinking về challenges của leadership
• Shows awareness về broader social context (gender equality, climate change)
• Philosophical reflection về “maintaining one’s humanity in power”

🎙️ Delivery Professional:

• Structure rõ ràng: Introduction → Background → Why newsworthy → Personal reasons
• Balanced giữa factual information và personal reflection
• Concludes với broader insight về leadership lessons
• Maintains engagement throughout với varied sentence structures và vocabulary

Thí sinh tự tin trình bày bài nói Part 2 về người nổi tiếng trong IELTS Speaking

---

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Sau khi bạn hoàn thành Part 2, examiner thường hỏi 1-2 câu ngắn để kết thúc phần này trước khi chuyển sang Part 3. Đây là những câu hỏi đơn giản, trả lời ngắn gọn trong 2-3 câu.

Question 1: Have you ever had the opportunity to meet any famous person in real life?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“No, I haven’t actually. I’ve seen some local celebrities at public events, but I’ve never had a real conversation with anyone really famous. I think it would be quite exciting if I had that chance.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Unfortunately not yet, though I did come close to meeting a well-known author at a book signing event last year – the queue was absurdly long so I had to leave early. That said, I’ve always felt that genuine connections matter more than brief celebrity encounters, so I’d rather wait for a meaningful interaction than simply snapping a selfie with someone famous.”

---

Question 2: Do you think meeting this person would change your life in any way?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, I think it would be a memorable experience. It might give me more motivation in my own life and career. Just hearing their advice directly would be valuable.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“I wouldn’t expect a dramatic transformation, but I do believe that engaging with someone who embodies the values and achievements you admire can subtly shift your perspective. Even a brief conversation could crystallize ideas I’ve been grappling with or validate certain principles I’m trying to uphold in my own life. It’s less about life-changing advice and more about that intangible inspiration you get from witnessing excellence firsthand.”

---

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần thảo luận hai chiều (two-way discussion) kéo dài 4-5 phút, là phần khó nhất và quan trọng nhất để phân biệt band điểm cao. Examiner sẽ hỏi các câu hỏi trừu tượng, sâu sắc hơn liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2, yêu cầu bạn phân tích, so sánh, đánh giá và đưa ra quan điểm có chiều sâu.

Yêu cầu của Part 3:

• Phân tích các vấn đề xã hội rộng lớn hơn, không chỉ kinh nghiệm cá nhân
• So sánh quá khứ và hiện tại, hoặc các quan điểm khác nhau
• Đánh giá advantages/disadvantages, causes/effects, problems/solutions
• Đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân nhưng có supporting arguments
• Xem xét nhiều perspectives của một vấn đề

Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời 3-5 câu, không dừng sau 1-2 câu
• Sử dụng discourse markers để organize ideas (Well, Actually, On the one hand…)
• Đưa ra general examples từ xã hội, research, common trends – không chỉ “my friend” hay “my experience”
• Thừa nhận complexity: “It depends…”, “There are several factors…”, “It’s difficult to generalize…”
• Structure: Direct answer → Explanation → Example → Additional point/Contrast

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn, thiếu elaboration và depth
• Không đưa ra clear opinion hoặc chỉ nói “I don’t know”
• Thiếu từ vựng abstract và academic
• Không structure câu trả lời, nói lan man
• Chỉ nói về personal experience thay vì broader social issues
• Sợ disagree với examiner nên không express real opinion
• Không acknowledge different viewpoints

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Media Influence and Celebrity Culture

---

Question 1: Why do you think some people are so interested in the lives of celebrities?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause/Reason – tại sao
• Key words: “interested in lives of celebrities”
• Cách tiếp cận: Đưa ra multiple reasons, xem xét psychological và social factors, có thể mention both positive và negative aspects

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think people are interested in celebrities because they want to see how famous people live. Celebrities have glamorous lifestyles with expensive things, which is very different from ordinary life. Also, following celebrities on social media is entertaining and gives people something to talk about with their friends. Some people might also want to learn from successful people.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có several reasons nhưng không deeply developed
• Vocabulary: Basic (glamorous, expensive, entertaining, successful)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response với multiple points nhưng thiếu sophisticated analysis và academic vocabulary

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Well, I think this phenomenon can be attributed to several interconnected factors. From a psychological standpoint, celebrity culture offers a form of escapism – people living ordinary lives find it fascinating to glimpse into a world of glamour and success that seems so far removed from their daily reality. There’s also an element of vicarious living; by following celebrities’ journeys, people experience excitement and drama without any personal risk.

Moreover, I’d argue that social media has amplified this interest exponentially. The unprecedented access to celebrities’ personal lives blurs the line between public figures and acquaintances, creating an illusion of intimacy that makes people feel personally invested. On a societal level, celebrities often serve as cultural touchstones – they embody aspirations, represent social movements, or simply provide common ground for conversations.

That said, I think there’s a more nuanced aspect to consider. Some people follow celebrities not merely for entertainment but because they genuinely admire their work or their advocacy for important causes. For instance, following a scientist who’s breaking barriers in their field or an activist championing social justice is quite different from obsessing over reality TV personalities. The motivation behind the interest really determines whether it’s a harmless pastime or something more concerning.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized: Direct answer → Psychological reasons → Social media impact → Societal function → Nuanced perspective
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated (interconnected factors, escapism, vicarious living, amplified, unprecedented access, cultural touchstones, embody)
• Grammar: Complex structures: passive voice (can be attributed to), relative clauses, present perfect (has amplified), cleft sentences (The motivation behind… determines)
• Critical Thinking: Shows balanced view, acknowledges complexity, distinguishes between types of interest

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Well”, “Moreover”, “That said”, “For instance” – creates smooth flow
• Tentative language: “I think”, “I’d argue”, “can be attributed to” – academic tone
• Abstract nouns: “phenomenon”, “escapism”, “intimacy”, “aspirations” – shows lexical range
• Collocations: “glimpse into”, “far removed from”, “blurs the line”, “common ground”

---

Question 2: Do you think news organizations give too much attention to celebrities compared to more serious issues?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Comparison
• Key words: “too much attention”, “compared to serious issues”
• Cách tiếp cận: Express clear opinion, acknowledge both sides, explain consequences, suggest balance

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think so. Many news channels spend a lot of time talking about celebrities’ personal lives instead of reporting important news about politics or the economy. This is probably because celebrity news attracts more viewers and makes more money for the media companies. However, this means that people might not be well-informed about serious problems in society. I think news should focus more on important issues.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear opinion với basic reasoning
• Vocabulary: Simple (a lot of time, important news, makes money, serious problems)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Answers the question adequately nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated expression

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Actually, I’d say this is a legitimate concern that reflects a broader shift in media priorities over recent decades. There’s no denying that celebrity-focused content has become disproportionately prominent, often crowding out substantive coverage of critical issues like climate policy, economic inequality, or geopolitical tensions.

The root cause, I believe, lies in the commercial imperatives driving modern media. Celebrity stories generate higher engagement metrics – more clicks, shares, and viewing time – which translates directly into advertising revenue. It’s a classic case of supply meeting demand; media organizations are responding to what audiences consume, even if it’s not necessarily what they need to be informed citizens. This creates a vicious cycle where serious journalism becomes increasingly marginalized.

However, I think we need to avoid painting with too broad a brush. Not all celebrity coverage is frivolous – when public figures use their platform to draw attention to humanitarian crises or social justice issues, that coverage serves a valuable purpose. The real problem is when sensationalized gossip masquerades as news, displacing genuine investigative journalism.

What concerns me most is the long-term impact on democratic discourse. An informed citizenry is fundamental to democracy, and when people are more conversant with celebrity relationships than with policy debates, it undermines the quality of public decision-making. Ideally, news organizations would strike a balance – acknowledging audience interests while maintaining a commitment to their societal responsibility to inform.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Complex organization: Agreement → Root cause analysis → Counterargument → Consequences → Ideal solution
• Vocabulary: Academic và precise (legitimate concern, disproportionately prominent, commercial imperatives, engagement metrics, vicious cycle, marginalized, sensationalized gossip, informed citizenry)
• Grammar: Advanced structures: cleft sentences (What concerns me most is…), passive constructions, conditionals, gerunds as subjects
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates nuanced understanding, acknowledges complexity, considers multiple perspectives, discusses implications

💡 Key Language Features:

• Concession language: “However”, “Not all…is”, “The real problem is when”
• Cause-effect markers: “translates directly into”, “creates a vicious cycle”, “undermines”
• Emphatic structures: “There’s no denying that”, “What concerns me most”
• Academic phrases: “reflects a broader shift”, “a classic case of”, “avoid painting with too broad a brush”

---

Theme 2: Impact of Public Figures

Question 3: In what ways can famous people influence society positively?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Ways/Methods – liệt kê và giải thích
• Key words: “influence society positively”
• Cách tiếp cận: Categorize different types of influence, provide specific examples, explain mechanisms

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Famous people can influence society in many good ways. They can use their popularity to support charities and raise money for important causes. For example, many celebrities donate to hospitals or schools. They can also be role models for young people, showing them that hard work leads to success. Some famous people speak about environmental problems or social issues, which makes more people aware of these problems.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists several ways with brief explanations
• Vocabulary: Basic (good ways, important causes, role models, hard work)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers multiple points but lacks sophisticated vocabulary và depth of analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“I think public figures can wield considerable influence across multiple domains when they leverage their platform responsibly.

First and foremost, they can amplify marginalized voices and bring visibility to causes that might otherwise struggle for mainstream attention. Take Angelina Jolie’s work as a UN ambassador, for instance – her celebrity status has shone a spotlight on refugee crises and humanitarian issues that typically receive scant media coverage. This ripple effect can translate into increased donations, policy changes, and sustained public engagement with these issues.

Equally important is their role in shaping social norms and attitudes. When prominent athletes come out as LGBTQ+ or when actors speak candidly about mental health struggles, it helps destigmatize these issues and fosters a more inclusive cultural climate. Their vulnerability can give permission to ordinary people to seek help or embrace their authentic selves.

Additionally, celebrities can serve as catalysts for behavioral change on issues like environmental sustainability. When influential figures adopt eco-conscious practices and vocalize their commitment to climate action, it can trigger a cascade of imitation among their followers – what’s sometimes called the “celebrity endorsement effect.”

That being said, I think the most profound impact occurs when celebrities transcend mere advocacy and actually invest their resources and time into creating lasting change – whether that’s establishing foundations, funding research, or directly engaging with communities. This demonstrates genuine commitment rather than superficial virtue signaling.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly organized with clear categories: Amplifying causes → Shaping norms → Behavioral change → Deep commitment
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated (wield considerable influence, amplify marginalized voices, shone a spotlight on, ripple effect, destigmatize, catalysts for, cascade of imitation, transcend mere advocacy, virtue signaling)
• Grammar: Wide range including: conditionals, participle phrases, cleft sentences, academic passive constructions
• Examples: Specific và relevant (Angelina Jolie, LGBTQ+ athletes, eco-conscious practices)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Sequencing: “First and foremost”, “Equally important”, “Additionally”, “That being said”
• Academic phrases: “wield considerable influence”, “translate into”, “serves as catalysts for”
• Technical terms: “ripple effect”, “celebrity endorsement effect”, “virtue signaling”
• Contrasts: “genuine commitment” vs “superficial virtue signaling”

---

Question 4: Do you think young people are too influenced by what they see famous people doing?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion về “too much” – requires balanced view
• Key words: “young people”, “too influenced”
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge có influence, discuss whether it’s excessive, consider both negative và positive aspects, factor in individual differences

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think young people are quite influenced by celebrities, maybe too much sometimes. Many teenagers try to copy what celebrities wear or how they act because they want to be like them. This can be negative if they copy bad behaviors like expensive shopping or unhealthy lifestyles. However, sometimes celebrities can be good influences too, like when they promote education or healthy living. I think it depends on the individual – some young people can think critically and others follow celebrities blindly.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Balanced view với positive và negative points
• Vocabulary: Adequate (copy, bad behaviors, good influences, think critically)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Presents both sides but lacks nuanced analysis và sophisticated language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is a nuanced question that I think defies a simple yes or no answer. While it’s true that young people are particularly susceptible to celebrity influence during their formative years, I’d hesitate to say they’re universally too influenced – it really varies considerably based on numerous factors.

On one hand, there’s compelling evidence that celebrity culture can exert unhealthy pressure on young people. Social media has intensified this dynamic, creating unrealistic standards around appearance, lifestyle, and success that can contribute to anxiety, body image issues, and materialistic values. The curated perfection presented by influencers can be particularly pernicious because it masquerades as authentic and attainable, when in reality it’s often heavily edited and financially out of reach for most people.

On the other hand, I think we risk underestimating young people’s critical faculties. Research suggests that media literacy education has made significant strides, and many young people are increasingly savvy about distinguishing between aspirational content and reality. Moreover, not all celebrity influence is negative – role models who advocate for education, social justice, or mental health awareness can inspire positive change.

What strikes me as most important is equipping young people with the tools to engage critically with media rather than attempting to shield them from it entirely. The influence itself isn’t inherently problematic; it’s the lack of critical engagement that creates vulnerability. In an ideal scenario, young people would be exposed to diverse perspectives and taught to question the motives behind celebrity messaging, empowering them to cherry-pick positive influences while recognizing manipulative marketing.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated: Acknowledges complexity → Negative aspects → Positive counter-arguments → Practical solution
• Vocabulary: Advanced (nuanced, defies simple answer, susceptible to, formative years, exert pressure, curated perfection, pernicious, media literacy, aspirational content)
• Grammar: Complex range: cleft sentences (What strikes me…), relative clauses, conditionals, present perfect, participle phrases
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates balanced reasoning, questions assumptions, proposes solutions, acknowledges individual differences

💡 Key Language Features:

• Hedging language: “I’d hesitate to say”, “it really varies”, “can be”, “suggests that”
• Contrasting: “On one hand… On the other hand”, “not all… is”
• Emphatic structures: “What strikes me as most important”, “The influence itself isn’t”
• Academic vocabulary: “compelling evidence”, “intensified this dynamic”, “equipping young people with”

Thảo luận chuyên sâu Part 3 về ảnh hưởng của người nổi tiếng trong IELTS Speaking

---

Theme 3: Privacy and Media Ethics

Question 5: Should there be limits on what journalists can report about famous people’s private lives?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Should question – opinion về ethics và regulation
• Key words: “limits”, “private lives”
• Cách tiếp cận: State position, discuss competing values (privacy vs public interest), consider practical implications, acknowledge complexity

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think there should be some limits. Famous people also have a right to privacy, especially about their families and personal relationships. Journalists shouldn’t follow them everywhere or publish private photos without permission. However, if a famous person does something illegal or dishonest, then the public has a right to know about it. So I think there should be a balance between protecting privacy and informing the public about important things.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear opinion with basic reasoning
• Vocabulary: Simple (right to privacy, without permission, illegal, balance)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Presents coherent argument but lacks sophistication và depth

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“I think this question really gets at the heart of the ongoing tension between press freedom and individual privacy rights, and I believe the answer lies in establishing nuanced boundaries rather than blanket restrictions.

In principle, I’m strongly in favor of protecting celebrities’ private lives from unwarranted intrusion. The relentless hounding by paparazzi and the publication of intimate details without consent constitutes a violation of basic human dignity, regardless of someone’s public profile. The tragic case of Princess Diana serves as a stark reminder of how this can escalate to devastating consequences. From an ethical standpoint, being a public figure doesn’t nullify one’s right to personal boundaries.

However, I think we need to draw a distinction between genuinely private matters and issues that legitimately fall under public interest. When a politician preaches family values while engaging in extramarital affairs, or when a health influencer secretly undergoes cosmetic procedures they claim are natural, there’s a compelling public interest in exposing such hypocrisy. Similarly, if a celebrity’s private behavior involves criminal activity or poses harm to others, journalistic scrutiny is warranted.

The challenge lies in defining where this line should be drawn. I’d advocate for robust legal frameworks that protect against genuinely invasive practices – like long-lens photography in private spaces or phone hacking – while preserving journalists’ ability to investigate matters of genuine public concern. Independent press regulators could play a role in adjudicating these boundaries.

Ultimately, I think the guiding principle should be proportionality – weighing the public interest in disclosure against the harm caused by invasion of privacy, with the burden of proof on media organizations to justify intrusions into private life.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated: Introduces tension → Principle position → Qualification/Exceptions → Practical implementation → Guiding principle
• Vocabulary: Academic và precise (gets at the heart of, unwarranted intrusion, relentless hounding, nullify, draw a distinction, preaches, warranted, adjudicating, proportionality, burden of proof)
• Grammar: Full range: cleft sentences, passive constructions, participle phrases, conditionals, gerunds
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates ethical reasoning, acknowledges competing values, proposes practical framework, uses examples effectively

💡 Key Language Features:

• Introducing complexity: “gets at the heart of”, “nuanced boundaries”, “The challenge lies in”
• Contrasting: “In principle… However”, “draw a distinction between”
• Academic phrases: “From an ethical standpoint”, “legitimate fall under”, “compelling public interest”
• Legal/ethical terminology: “violation of dignity”, “proportionality”, “burden of proof”, “justify intrusions”

---

Question 6: How has social media changed the relationship between celebrities and their fans?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: How (ways of change) – so sánh past vs present
• Key words: “social media”, “relationship”, “changed”
• Cách tiếp cận: Describe past relationship, contrast với present, analyze multiple dimensions of change, discuss implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Social media has changed this relationship a lot. In the past, celebrities seemed very distant and fans could only see them on TV or in magazines. Now, fans can follow celebrities on Instagram or Twitter and see their daily lives. This makes celebrities seem more approachable and real. Fans can also comment and sometimes celebrities reply, which makes fans feel closer to them. However, this also means celebrities have less privacy and face more criticism online.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Past vs present comparison with some consequences
• Vocabulary: Basic (a lot, distant, approachable, real, closer)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points but lacks sophisticated analysis và academic language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Social media has absolutely revolutionized this dynamic, fundamentally altering the traditional power structures and distance that once characterized celebrity-fan relationships.

Historically, celebrities existed in a rarefied sphere, mediated entirely through gatekeepers like publicists, journalists, and studios. Fans consumed carefully curated images and had virtually no direct access. This mystique was actually integral to their appeal – there was an aspirational distance that made them seem larger than life.

Fast forward to today, and social media has dismantled many of these barriers. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok enable celebrities to bypass traditional media entirely and communicate directly with millions of followers. This creates an illusion of intimacy – fans feel they’re getting unfiltered glimpses into celebrities’ lives, seeing them in their homes, with their families, having seemingly candid moments. This perceived authenticity can forge much stronger emotional connections.

However, I think it’s crucial to recognize this as a carefully constructed relationship. What appears spontaneous is often strategically managed – celebrities are acutely aware they’re cultivating their personal brand. The interactivity – likes, comments, shares – creates a feedback loop that gives fans a sense of participation, but the power dynamic remains fundamentally asymmetrical.

There are profound implications here. On one hand, this democratization allows more diverse voices to gain platforms without relying on traditional industry gatekeepers. Independent artists can build followings organically. On the other hand, it’s created unprecedented pressure on public figures to be constantly accessible and performatively authentic, while fans sometimes develop parasocial relationships that blur boundaries unhealthily.

What’s particularly interesting is how this has spawned an entirely new category of “celebrity” – influencers who built their fame entirely through social media, further complicating traditional notions of fame and merit.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-organized: Historical context → Current situation → Critical analysis → Implications (positive/negative) → Broader trend
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated (revolutionized, rarefied sphere, mediated, gatekeepers, mystique, dismantled barriers, illusion of intimacy, unfiltered glimpses, forge connections, asymmetrical, democratization, parasocial relationships)
• Grammar: Advanced range: present perfect (has revolutionized), passive voice (was mediated, is strategically managed), participle clauses, comparative structures
• Critical Thinking: Multi-layered analysis, questions assumptions about authenticity, discusses power dynamics, considers both positive and negative consequences

💡 Key Language Features:

• Time contrast: “Historically… Fast forward to today”
• Emphatic language: “absolutely revolutionized”, “fundamentally altering”, “entirely new category”
• Analytical phrases: “it’s crucial to recognize”, “There are profound implications”, “What’s particularly interesting”
• Academic vocabulary: “characterized”, “integral to”, “bypass”, “forge”, “cultivating”, “asymmetrical”, “spawned”

---

Theme 4: Future Trends and Younger Generations

Question 7: Do you think the types of people who become famous will change in the future?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Future prediction với reasoning
• Key words: “types of people”, “become famous”, “future”
• Cách tiếp cận: Discuss current trends, project future changes, explain driving forces, consider uncertainties

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think it will change. Right now, many people become famous through social media, not just through traditional ways like acting or singing. In the future, I think more regular people will become famous through the internet. Maybe scientists or educators will become more famous too, because people are interested in learning. Technology will continue to make it easier for anyone to become famous if they have interesting content.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Present situation → Future prediction with basic reasoning
• Vocabulary: Simple (regular people, interested in, interesting content)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses the question adequately but lacks sophisticated analysis và specific examples

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“I think we’re already witnessing the early stages of significant shifts in the pathways to fame, and these trends will likely accelerate in coming years.

Traditional routes to celebrity – through entertainment industries, sports, or political prominence – aren’t disappearing, but they’re being supplemented by much more democratized avenues. We’re seeing niche experts and specialists gaining substantial followings – think scientists like Neil deGrasse Tyson making astrophysics accessible, or historians engaging millions through TikTok. This reflects a broader cultural shift toward valuing substance and expertise alongside entertainment value.

I anticipate this trend will intensify as audiences become increasingly sophisticated and perhaps fatigued by the superficiality of traditional celebrity culture. There’s growing appetite for what I’d call “knowledge influencers” – people who combine expertise with engaging communication skills. The success of platforms like MasterClass and educational YouTube channels underscores this demand.

Moreover, I think technological advances will continue to reshape the landscape. Virtual influencers – entirely computer-generated personas – are already gaining traction. As AI becomes more sophisticated, we might see entirely new categories of famous “people” who aren’t even human. Similarly, the metaverse and augmented reality could create parallel forms of fame that transcend physical-world constraints.

Another dimension worth considering is the potential fragmentation of fame itself. Rather than a handful of universally recognized celebrities, we might move toward thousands of micro-celebrities who are tremendously influential within specific communities but virtually unknown outside them. This would represent a more pluralistic model of fame.

That said, I think certain constants will endure – charisma, authenticity (or perceived authenticity), and the ability to tap into cultural moments will remain important regardless of the medium or type of celebrity.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Masterful organization: Current shifts → Future intensification → Technology impact → Fragmentation trend → Enduring constants
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated (witnessing early stages, democratized avenues, niche experts, fatigued by superficiality, underscores, gaining traction, transcend constraints, fragmentation, pluralistic model, endure)
• Grammar: Full range: present continuous for trends, future predictions, passive constructions, relative clauses, conditional structures
• Critical Thinking: Multi-faceted analysis considering technology, social trends, economic factors, acknowledges uncertainties

💡 Key Language Features:

• Future predictions: “I anticipate”, “will likely accelerate”, “we might see”, “could create”
• Trend language: “witnessing early stages”, “reflects a broader shift”, “growing appetite for”, “gaining traction”
• Contrasting: “aren’t disappearing, but being supplemented”, “traditional… alongside entertainment”
• Academic phrases: “underscores this demand”, “worth considering”, “represent a more pluralistic model”

---

Question 8: What qualities do you think are most important for someone to maintain their fame over a long period?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Qualities/Characteristics – describe và explain
• Key words: “qualities”, “maintain fame”, “long period”
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple qualities, explain why each matters, contrast short-term vs long-term fame, use examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think talent is the most important thing for staying famous. If someone is really good at what they do, people will continue to support them. Also, they need to be professional and avoid scandals that could damage their reputation. Being nice to fans is important too, because fans are the ones who keep them famous. Finally, they should be able to change with the times and stay relevant.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists several qualities with brief explanations
• Vocabulary: Basic (really good, nice to fans, change with times, stay relevant)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Identifies key points but lacks depth và sophisticated expression

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is a fascinating question because sustained fame requires a rather different skill set from achieving it in the first place. I’d identify several critical factors.

First and foremost is adaptability – the ability to evolve with changing cultural landscapes while maintaining a coherent identity. Look at someone like David Bowie, who constantly reinvented himself musically and aesthetically throughout decades, yet remained distinctively “Bowie.” Those who cling rigidly to their original formula often become relics of a particular era rather than enduring figures.

Equally crucial is what I’d call “strategic authenticity” – maintaining a sense of genuine connection with audiences while also professionally managing one’s public persona. This is a delicate balancing act. People who seem entirely manufactured struggle to sustain long-term relevance, but those who share every unfiltered thought can self-destruct spectacularly. The sweet spot lies in curating vulnerability – being selectively open in ways that foster connection without compromising professionalism.

Resilience is another vital component. Virtually everyone who’s been famous long enough has weathered controversies, failures, or shifts in public taste. The ability to recover from setbacks, learn from mistakes, and rebuild public favor distinguishes those with staying power from flash-in-the-pan celebrities.

I’d also argue that diversification matters increasingly. Celebrities who branch out – whether launching businesses, engaging in philanthropy, or pursuing multiple creative outlets – create multiple touchpoints with audiences and insulate themselves somewhat from downturns in any single area.

Finally, and perhaps most intangibly, there’s cultural timing – an almost instinctive ability to read and ride cultural waves, to reinvent oneself in sync with broader social shifts. This isn’t something that can be easily manufactured; it requires genuine cultural awareness and intellectual curiosity.

Ultimately, I think longevity in fame requires treating it not as an endpoint but as a platform requiring constant maintenance, evolution, and meaningful engagement with one’s field and audience.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally sophisticated: Introduction → Adaptability → Authenticity → Resilience → Diversification → Cultural timing → Synthesis
• Vocabulary: Advanced (sustained fame, skill set, constantly reinvented, cling rigidly to, relics of, enduring figures, strategic authenticity, delicate balancing act, curated vulnerability, weathered controversies, staying power, flash-in-the-pan, branch out, insulate themselves, intangibly, instinctive ability)
• Grammar: Full range: relative clauses, participle phrases, gerunds, comparative structures, cleft sentences, conditionals
• Examples: Specific và well-integrated (David Bowie)
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis, uses metaphors effectively, acknowledges complexity and trade-offs

💡 Key Language Features:

• Structuring: “First and foremost”, “Equally crucial”, “Another vital component”, “Finally”, “Ultimately”
• Academic phrases: “critical factors”, “delicate balancing act”, “vital component”, “distinguishes those with”
• Metaphorical language: “ride cultural waves”, “sweet spot”, “touchpoints”, “platform requiring maintenance”
• Contrasting: “while maintaining”, “those who… struggle to”, “distinguishes… from”

Bảng tiêu chí chấm điểm IELTS Speaking với các band từ 6 đến 9

---

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
household name	n	/ˈhaʊshəʊld neɪm/	người nổi tiếng, cái tên quen thuộc	She has become a household name since winning the award.	become/remain a household name
gain prominence	v phrase	/ɡeɪn ˈprɒmɪnəns/	trở nên nổi bật, nổi tiếng	He gained international prominence after his breakthrough research.	gain/achieve/rise to prominence
public figure	n	/ˈpʌblɪk ˈfɪɡə(r)/	nhân vật công chúng	As a public figure, she has a responsibility to her fans.	prominent/controversial/influential public figure
media coverage	n	/ˈmiːdiə ˈkʌvərɪdʒ/	sự đưa tin của truyền thông	The event received extensive media coverage.	extensive/widespread/negative media coverage
in the spotlight	idiom	/ɪn ðə ˈspɒtlaɪt/	ở vị trí thu hút sự chú ý	Being constantly in the spotlight can be exhausting.	thrust into/remain in/step out of the spotlight
make headlines	v phrase	/meɪk ˈhedlaɪnz/	gây chú ý lớn, lên tít báo	Her controversial comments made headlines worldwide.	make/grab/hit the headlines
role model	n	/ˈrəʊl mɒdl/	hình mẫu, tấm gương	Athletes should strive to be positive role models for youth.	positive/inspiring/negative role model
influential figure	n	/ˌɪnfluˈenʃl ˈfɪɡə(r)/	nhân vật có ảnh hưởng	She’s one of the most influential figures in modern politics.	highly/increasingly/influential figure
advocate for	v phrase	/ˈædvəkeɪt fɔː(r)/	ủng hộ, vận động cho	He’s been advocating for climate action for decades.	strongly/actively/passionately advocate for
champion a cause	v phrase	/ˈtʃæmpiən ə kɔːz/	đấu tranh cho một mục đích	She champions women’s rights through her foundation.	champion/support/promote a cause
raise awareness	v phrase	/reɪz əˈweənəs/	nâng cao nhận thức	The campaign aims to raise awareness about mental health.	raise/increase/heighten awareness
leverage one’s platform	v phrase	/ˈlevərɪdʒ wʌnz ˈplætfɔːm/	tận dụng vị thế, nền tảng của mình	She leveraged her platform to support disadvantaged communities.	leverage/use/maximize one’s platform
unwavering commitment	n	/ʌnˈweɪvərɪŋ kəˈmɪtmənt/	sự cam kết kiên định	His unwavering commitment to justice is admirable.	unwavering/steadfast/strong commitment
groundbreaking work	n	/ˈɡraʊndbreɪkɪŋ wɜːk/	công trình đột phá	Her groundbreaking work in medicine saved countless lives.	groundbreaking/pioneering/innovative work
trailblazer	n	/ˈtreɪlbleɪzə(r)/	người tiên phong, mở đường	She was a trailblazer for women in technology.	become/remain/recognized as a trailblazer
larger than life	idiom	/ˈlɑːdʒə(r) ðæn laɪf/	vượt trội, phi thường	His personality was larger than life, captivating everyone.	larger-than-life personality/character/presence
come under scrutiny	v phrase	/kʌm ˈʌndə(r) ˈskruːtəni/	bị xem xét kỹ, bị giám sát	His business practices came under scrutiny from regulators.	come/fall under scrutiny
weather the storm	idiom	/ˈweðə(r) ðə stɔːm/	vượt qua khó khăn, sóng gió	Despite the scandal, she weathered the storm and rebuilt her career.	weather/ride out/survive the storm
tarnish one’s reputation	v phrase	/ˈtɑːnɪʃ wʌnz ˌrepjuˈteɪʃn/	làm hoen ố danh tiếng	The allegations threatened to tarnish his hard-earned reputation.	tarnish/damage/ruin one’s reputation
paparazzi	n	/ˌpæpəˈrætsi/	nhiếp ảnh gia săn tin	Celebrities often struggle with intrusive paparazzi.	avoid/escape/hounded by paparazzi

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
be in the public eye	được công chúng chú ý	Being in the public eye means sacrificing some privacy.	7.5-8
steal the spotlight	chiếm trọn sự chú ý	Her performance stole the spotlight at the awards ceremony.	7-8
have star quality	có tố chất ngôi sao	Even as a newcomer, she clearly has star quality.	7-8
cult following	nhóm người hâm mộ cuồng nhiệt	The band developed a cult following over the years.	7.5-8.5
meteoric rise	sự nổi lên nhanh chóng như sao băng	His meteoric rise to fame surprised everyone.	8-9
flash in the pan	hiện tượng nhất thời	Many reality TV stars turn out to be just a flash in the pan.	7.5-8.5
fall from grace	mất địa vị, danh tiếng	The politician’s fall from grace was swift and dramatic.	8-9
on the radar	được chú ý, được quan tâm	She’s definitely on the radar of major film studios now.	7-8
make one’s mark	tạo dấu ấn, thành công nổi bật	She made her mark in the industry through innovative approaches.	7.5-8
cut through the noise	nổi bật giữa đám đông	To succeed today, you need to cut through the noise on social media.	8-9
ride the wave of success	tận dụng thành công	After the viral video, he rode the wave of success skillfully.	7.5-8.5
cultivate an image	xây dựng hình ảnh	Celebrities carefully cultivate an image for public consumption.	8-9

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ ngắn
  • “Well, I think this is a complex issue…”
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn bất ngờ hoặc correct một assumption
  • “Actually, I’d argue that celebrity culture isn’t entirely negative…”
• 📝 To be honest,… / Honestly,… – Khi muốn nói thật lòng
  • “To be honest, I’m not particularly interested in celebrity gossip…”
• 📝 I’d say that… / I would argue that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm có phân tích
  • “I’d say that the relationship between celebrities and media has fundamentally changed…”

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… / Moreover,… / Furthermore,… – Thêm vào đó
  • “Moreover, social media has amplified the influence of public figures…”
• 📝 What’s more,… / In addition,… – Hơn nữa
  • “What’s more, young people are increasingly savvy about media manipulation…”
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
  • “Not to mention the pressure it puts on celebrities’ mental health…”
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra
  • “Beyond that, we need to consider the economic implications…”

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
  • “On the one hand, celebrities have huge platforms. On the other hand, they face constant scrutiny.”
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng cũng cần xét đến
  • “While it’s true that fame brings privileges, we also need to consider the loss of privacy.”
• 📝 That said,… / Having said that,… – Tuy nhiên (sau khi đã nói điều gì đó)
  • “I admire her work. That said, I think some of her comments were misguided.”

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… / Overall,… – Tóm lại
  • “All in all, I think fame is a double-edged sword.”
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì
  • “At the end of the day, celebrities are human beings who deserve respect.”
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Về căn bản thì
  • “Ultimately, the media’s responsibility should be balanced with individuals’ privacy rights.”

Để giải thích hoặc clarify:

• 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là
  • “What I mean is that not all publicity is beneficial.”
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác
  • “In other words, celebrity influence can be a force for good or harm.”
• 📝 To put it another way,… – Diễn đạt theo cách khác
  • “To put it another way, fame comes with significant responsibilities.”

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

• Mixed conditional: Kết hợp điều kiện quá khứ với kết quả hiện tại

  • Formula: If + past perfect, would + verb
  • Ví dụ: “If social media hadn’t emerged, celebrities would still maintain more mystique today.”

• Inversion trong conditional: Tạo formal tone

  • Formula: Were/Had/Should + subject + verb
  • Ví dụ: “Were I to meet her, I would ask about her motivation.”
  • “Had he not leveraged social media, he wouldn’t be this successful.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

• Non-defining relative clauses: Thêm thông tin không thiết yếu

  • Formula: …, which/who/where + clause, …
  • Ví dụ: “Elon Musk, who owns Twitter, frequently appears in tech news.”
  • “The scandal, which erupted last year, damaged his reputation significantly.”

• Reduced relative clauses: Rút gọn mệnh đề quan hệ

  • Formula: noun + V-ing/V-ed
  • Ví dụ: “Celebrities appearing in the news often face intense scrutiny.”
  • “The policies implemented by her government were groundbreaking.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

• It is thought/believed/said that… – Impersonal passive

  • Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that celebrity culture has become too pervasive.”
  • “It is often said that fame comes at a price.”

• Passive với modal verbs:

  • Ví dụ: “Privacy rights should be protected, regardless of one’s fame.”
  • “Such intrusive behavior cannot be justified by public interest.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

• What-cleft: Nhấn mạnh object hoặc action

  • Formula: What + subject + verb + is/was + noun/clause
  • Ví dụ: “What I find most impressive about her is her resilience.”
  • “What really concerns me is the impact on young people’s self-esteem.”

• It-cleft: Nhấn mạnh một thành phần cụ thể

  • Formula: It + is/was + emphasized element + that/who + clause
  • Ví dụ: “It was her humanitarian work that earned her international recognition.”
  • “It’s not the fame itself that’s problematic, but how it’s pursued.”

5. Inversion for Emphasis:

• Negative adverbs at start:
  • Ví dụ: “Never before have we seen such immediate access to celebrities’ lives.”
  • “Rarely does someone maintain fame over multiple decades without controversy.”
  • “Not only does she advocate for climate change, but she also actively funds research.”

6. Advanced Participle Clauses:

• Present participle (-ing) showing simultaneous action:

  • Ví dụ: “Having gained prominence through social media, she now leverages her platform for advocacy.”

• Perfect participle showing earlier action:

  • Ví dụ: “Having weathered numerous scandals, he emerged with his reputation intact.”

7. Subjunctive Mood:

• Trong formal suggestions:
  • Ví dụ: “I would suggest that media outlets be more responsible in their reporting.”
  • “It’s essential that celebrities maintain some boundaries with fans.”

8. Emphatic Structures:

• The thing/person that…:

  • Ví dụ: “The thing that sets her apart is her authenticity.”

• Using “do/does/did” for emphasis:

  • Ví dụ: “She does genuinely care about social causes, unlike some celebrities.”

---

Chiến Lược Tổng Thể Để Đạt Band Cao

Chuẩn Bị Trước Khi Thi

1. Xây Dựng Kho Từ Vựng Theo Chủ Đề

• Không học từ riêng lẻ mà học theo collocations và context
• Tạo mind map cho mỗi topic với các từ vựng liên quan
• Ghi âm mình đọc vocabulary lists để cải thiện pronunciation
• Practice using new words in sample sentences

2. Record và Self-Assessment

• Record câu trả lời của bạn và listen lại
• Identify hesitations, repetitions, grammar mistakes
• Compare với sample answers ở band cao
• Track improvement theo thời gian

3. Practice With Authentic Questions

• Sử dụng đề thi thật từ recent IELTS tests
• Time yourself strictly: Part 1 (4-5 min), Part 2 (2 min), Part 3 (4-5 min)
• Practice với speaking partners hoặc teachers
• Don’t memorize answers – practice flexible thinking

4. Improve Pronunciation Systematically

• Focus on word stress, sentence stress, và intonation
• Practice connected speech (linking, elision)
• Record native speakers và mimic their pronunciation
• Use apps like ELSA Speak cho feedback

Trong Phòng Thi

Part 1: First Impressions Matter

• ✅ Smile, make eye contact, greet examiner naturally
• ✅ Answer directly first, then elaborate
• ✅ Speak at natural pace – not too fast, not too slow
• ✅ Show enthusiasm về topics you’re interested in
• ❌ Don’t give one-word answers
• ❌ Don’t overthink – keep it conversational

Part 2: Structure and Deliver

• ✅ Use full 1 minute to plan – jot down keywords
• ✅ Address ALL bullet points
• ✅ Aim for 2 minutes minimum (ideal: 2-2.5 minutes)
• ✅ Use past/present tenses appropriately
• ✅ Include specific details, examples, emotions
• ✅ If you finish early, elaborate on the “explain” part
• ❌ Don’t write full sentences during prep time
• ❌ Don’t panic if you can’t think of perfect answer – adapt the question slightly

Part 3: Show Critical Thinking

• ✅ Take a moment to think before answering complex questions
• ✅ Structure: Direct answer → Reason/Explanation → Example → Additional point
• ✅ Use sophisticated discourse markers
• ✅ Acknowledge complexity: “It depends…”, “There are several factors…”
• ✅ Show balanced views: discuss different perspectives
• ✅ Connect ideas logically between answers
• ❌ Don’t say “I don’t know” – say “That’s an interesting question. I think…”
• ❌ Don’t give memorized essays – be flexible and responsive

Mindset và Attitude

Confidence Without Arrogance

• Speak clearly với conviction
• It’s okay to self-correct if you make a mistake
• Don’t apologize repeatedly for errors
• Remember: examiner wants you to succeed

Natural Communication

• Treat it like a conversation, not an interrogation
• React naturally to questions – it’s okay to say “That’s a good question”
• Show personality – humor is fine if natural
• Vary your intonation to avoid sounding monotonous

Handling Difficult Moments

• If you don’t understand a question: “Sorry, could you repeat that?” or “Do you mean…?”
• If you can’t think of vocabulary: paraphrase or use simpler words – don’t stop speaking
• If you go off-topic: self-correct – “Actually, to answer your question more directly…”
• If you make grammar mistake: quick correction is fine, then move on

Common Mistakes của Học Viên Việt Nam và Cách Khắc Phục

1. Speaking Too Fast

• Problem: Trying to show fluency leads to unclear pronunciation and mistakes
• Solution: Practice speaking at conversational pace với clear enunciation

2. Overusing Learned Phrases

• Problem: “To begin with, First and foremost” ở every answer
• Solution: Vary discourse markers naturally, sometimes just start directly

3. Translating Directly from Vietnamese

• Problem: Unnatural expressions like “very very very good”
• Solution: Learn English collocations và idioms in context

4. Being Too Formal or Too Casual

• Problem: Using academic language like thesis or slang like “yeah, cool”
• Solution: Aim for educated conversational style – friendly but articulate

5. Lack of Specific Examples

• Problem: Vague statements: “Many people think…”, “It’s very important…”
• Solution: Use specific examples: names, statistics, personal experiences

6. Ignoring Question và Giving Prepared Speech

• Problem: Answering a different question you prepared
• Solution: Listen carefully, address exact question asked, adapt flexibly

7. Stopping After Short Answers

• Problem: Not elaborating enough, especially in Part 1 and 3
• Solution: Always aim for 3+ sentences, use because/for example/such as

8. Pronunciation Issues with Word Endings

• Problem: Missing -s, -ed endings: “She work” instead of “She works”
• Solution: Slow down slightly, practice minimal pairs, record yourself

---

Kết Luận

Chủ đề “Describe a person who often appears in the news whom you would like to meet” là một đề bài IELTS Speaking phổ biến và đa chiều, cho phép bạn thể hiện không chỉ khả năng miêu tả mà còn phân tích sâu về các vấn đề xã hội liên quan đến truyền thông, người nổi tiếng và ảnh hưởng văn hóa.

Những điểm quan trọng cần nhớ:

✅ Về Nội Dung:

• Chọn một người bạn thực sự biết và quan tâm, không phải chỉ vì họ nổi tiếng
• Chuẩn bị cụ thể về achievements, recent news, personal qualities
• Có opinion rõ ràng và reasoning sâu sắc về why you want to meet them
• Kết nối với broader social issues ở Part 3

✅ Về Ngôn Ngữ:

• Band 6-7: Adequate vocabulary và grammar, clear communication
• Band 7.5-8: Sophisticated vocabulary, complex structures, detailed ideas
• Band 8.5-9: Precise language, idiomatic expressions, nuanced critical thinking
• Focus on collocations và natural phrases hơn là individual difficult words

✅ Về Kỹ Năng:

• Fluency không có nghĩa là fast – aim for smooth flow với natural pausing
• Coherence through logical organization và effective discourse markers
• Pronunciation with clear enunciation, appropriate stress và intonation
• Flexibility to adapt và respond authentically to questions

Lộ Trình Học Tập Đề Xuất:

Week 1-2: Building Foundation

• Learn topic-specific vocabulary với collocations
• Study sample answers, analyze structures
• Practice với easier questions (Part 1 style)

Week 3-4: Developing Fluency

• Record Part 2 responses, aim for 2 minutes
• Practice explaining complex ideas (Part 3)
• Work on pronunciation và connected speech

Week 5-6: Refinement

• Full mock tests với timing
• Focus on spontaneity – don’t memorize
• Get feedback from teachers hoặc study partners

Week 7-8: Polish

• Review common mistakes và avoid them
• Practice with various question types
• Build confidence through repeated exposure

Thái Độ Tâm Lý:
Remember that IELTS Speaking đánh giá communication skills, not knowledge. Examiner không quan tâm bạn chọn người nào để nói, họ đánh giá cách bạn express ideas. Be yourself, stay calm, và enjoy the conversation. Với preparation đúng cách và mindset tích cực, bạn hoàn toàn có thể đạt band điểm mục tiêu.

Final Tips từ Examiner:

• 💡 Quality over quantity – better một ý developed well hơn nhiều ý superficial
• 💡 Be honest – authenticity sounds better than rehearsed perfection
• 💡 Stay relevant – answer question asked, not question you wish was asked
• 💡 Show personality – examiners appreciate candidates who engage naturally
• 💡 Learn from mistakes – every practice session is improvement opportunity

Chúc các bạn học tốt và đạt band điểm cao trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking!