IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe A Time When You Shared Your Knowledge Or Expertise With Others” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề chia sẻ kiến thức và chuyên môn là một trong những đề tài phổ biến và đầy ý nghĩa trong IELTS Speaking. Với tư cách là một examiner có hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm chấm thi, tôi nhận thấy đây là chủ đề xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong các kỳ thi IELTS từ năm 2020 đến nay, đặc biệt là trong Part 2 và Part 3. Theo thống kê từ các trung tâm thi IELTS chính thức, chủ đề này xuất hiện khoảng 15-20 lần mỗi quý tại các test centers trên toàn cầu, và khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai vẫn ở mức cao.

Đây là một chủ đề tuyệt vời vì nó cho phép bạn thể hiện không chỉ khả năng ngôn ngữ mà còn cả tính cách, kỹ năng giao tiếp và giá trị cá nhân. Các góc độ thường được hỏi bao gồm: việc dạy học cho người khác, chia sẻ kỹ năng nghề nghiệp, hướng dẫn đồng nghiệp, giúp đỡ bạn bè trong học tập, hay truyền đạt kinh nghiệm sống.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được cách trả lời câu hỏi ở cả ba Part một cách tự nhiên và ấn tượng, từ những câu hỏi khởi động đơn giản trong Part 1, đến bài nói độc thoại chi tiết trong Part 2, cho đến những câu hỏi thảo luận sâu sắc trong Part 3. Tôi sẽ cung cấp các bài mẫu theo nhiều band điểm khác nhau từ 6.0 đến 9.0, kèm phân tích chi tiết về từng tiêu chí chấm điểm. Bạn cũng sẽ được trang bị một kho từ vựng phong phú, các cụm từ ăn điểm và những chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của một examiner chính thức.

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài khoảng 4-5 phút, trong đó examiner sẽ hỏi bạn các câu hỏi về cuộc sống hàng ngày, sở thích, công việc, học tập và môi trường sống. Đây là phần khởi động giúp bạn cảm thấy thoải mái trước khi chuyển sang các phần khó hơn.

Đặc điểm của Part 1 là các câu hỏi thường ngắn gọn, trực tiếp và không đòi hỏi suy nghĩ quá sâu. Tuy nhiên, chiến lược quan trọng là bạn cần mở rộng câu trả lời của mình thành 2-3 câu, không chỉ trả lời Yes/No hoặc một câu đơn giản.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 1 bao gồm:

• Trả lời quá ngắn, thiếu elaboration
• Sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “nice”, “interesting”
• Không đưa ra ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
• Nói theo template cứng nhắc, thiếu tự nhiên

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you like helping others learn new things?

Question 2: Have you ever taught someone a skill or subject?

Question 3: What kind of knowledge do you think is important to share with others?

Question 4: Do you prefer learning from others or teaching others?

Question 5: Have you ever learned something useful from a friend or family member?

Question 6: What was the most recent thing you taught someone?

Question 7: Do you think it’s important for people to share their knowledge?

Question 8: Are you good at explaining things to others?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you like helping others learn new things?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có hay không
• Đưa ra lý do tại sao bạn thích hoặc không thích
• Thêm một ví dụ ngắn gọn từ kinh nghiệm

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I really like helping others learn. I think it’s a good feeling when someone understands something because of my explanation. For example, I often help my younger sister with her English homework and she has improved a lot.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp, có lý do và ví dụ cụ thể
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản như “good feeling”, “a lot”; cấu trúc câu chưa đa dạng
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời rõ ràng và có đủ ba phần cơ bản, nhưng vocabulary và grammar chưa thể hiện được sự sophisticated

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Absolutely, I find it tremendously rewarding to help others acquire new skills or knowledge. There’s something deeply fulfilling about seeing that lightbulb moment when someone finally grasps a concept they’ve been struggling with. Just recently, I’ve been mentoring a colleague on using advanced Excel functions, and watching her confidence grow has been incredibly gratifying.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng từ vựng tinh tế như “tremendously rewarding”, “acquire”, “grasps a concept”, “mentoring”, “gratifying”; cấu trúc câu phức tạp với mệnh đề quan hệ và gerund; ý tưởng sâu sắc hơn với “lightbulb moment”
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Câu trả lời trôi chảy, tự nhiên với discourse marker “Absolutely”
  • Vocabulary: Precise và sophisticated với collocations mạnh
  • Grammar: Sử dụng present perfect continuous, gerund as subject, và complex sentences
  • Pronunciation: Các từ đa âm tiết được sử dụng cho thấy khả năng phát âm tốt

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• tremendously rewarding: cực kỳ đáng giá, mang lại sự hài lòng lớn
• acquire new skills or knowledge: tiếp thu kỹ năng hoặc kiến thức mới
• fulfilling: mang lại cảm giác thỏa mãn, trọn vẹn
• lightbulb moment: khoảnh khắc chợt hiểu ra, như bóng đèn bật sáng
• grasps a concept: nắm bắt được một khái niệm
• mentoring: hướng dẫn, làm người cố vấn

---

Question: What kind of knowledge do you think is important to share with others?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu loại kiến thức bạn cho là quan trọng
• Giải thích tại sao nó quan trọng
• Có thể đưa thêm ví dụ minh họa

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think practical skills are important to share. Things like cooking, basic computer skills, or how to manage money are useful for everyone. These skills help people in their daily life and make them more independent.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có câu trả lời rõ ràng với ví dụ cụ thể và lý do
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng đơn giản “things like”, “useful”, “help people”; thiếu depth trong việc phân tích
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đáp ứng yêu cầu cơ bản nhưng chưa thể hiện được level cao hơn về vocabulary range và complexity of ideas

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I believe life skills and practical expertise are paramount to share, particularly things like financial literacy, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence. These are foundational competencies that aren’t always taught in formal education but are essential for navigating modern life. For instance, understanding how to budget effectively or manage stress constructively can have a profound impact on someone’s quality of life, far beyond what academic knowledge alone can offer.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary xuất sắc với “paramount”, “financial literacy”, “foundational competencies”, “navigating modern life”; ý tưởng sâu sắc về sự khác biệt giữa formal education và life skills; cấu trúc câu phức tạp với relative clauses
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Sử dụng “I believe” và linking phrases như “particularly”, “for instance” một cách tự nhiên
  • Vocabulary: Abstract nouns và collocations mạnh như “profound impact”, “manage stress constructively”
  • Grammar: Relative clauses, infinitives, và complex noun phrases
  • Ideas: Thể hiện critical thinking bằng cách so sánh academic vs practical knowledge

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• paramount: tối quan trọng, có ý nghĩa hàng đầu
• financial literacy: hiểu biết về tài chính
• critical thinking: tư duy phản biện
• emotional intelligence: trí tuệ cảm xúc
• foundational competencies: những năng lực nền tảng
• navigating modern life: định hướng, điều hướng cuộc sống hiện đại
• profound impact: tác động sâu sắc

---

Question: Do you prefer learning from others or teaching others?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Chọn một trong hai hoặc nói cả hai
• Giải thích preference của bạn
• Kết nối với tính cách hoặc kinh nghiệm cá nhân

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think I prefer learning from others because I can always discover new things. I like listening to people who have more experience than me. But sometimes teaching others is also interesting because it helps me understand the topic better.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Đưa ra được cả hai góc nhìn, có lý do cơ bản
• Hạn chế: Dùng “I think” và “I like” quá nhiều; từ vựng chưa varied; câu văn còn đơn giản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Có structure cơ bản và ideas hợp lý nhưng thiếu sophistication trong cách diễn đạt

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Honestly, I’d say I equally value both, though for different reasons. Learning from others keeps me intellectually stimulated and humble – there’s always someone with a unique perspective or expertise to offer. However, teaching others is equally rewarding because it consolidates my own understanding and forces me to articulate concepts clearly. As the saying goes, “you don’t truly understand something until you can explain it to someone else,” and I’ve found this to be remarkably true in my experience.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Balanced view thể hiện mature thinking; sử dụng quotation để support idea; vocabulary cao cấp như “intellectually stimulated”, “consolidates”, “articulate”; grammar đa dạng với clauses và conjunctions
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Natural discourse marker “Honestly”, smooth transitions
  • Vocabulary: Precise word choices như “consolidates”, “articulate”, “remarkably”
  • Grammar: Complex structures với contrastive conjunctions, relative clauses
  • Ideas: Sophisticated với philosophical insight từ quotation

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• equally value both: đánh giá cao cả hai như nhau
• intellectually stimulated: được kích thích về mặt trí tuệ
• consolidates my own understanding: củng cố sự hiểu biết của bản thân
• articulate concepts clearly: diễn đạt các khái niệm một cách rõ ràng
• remarkably true: đúng một cách đáng chú ý

Học viên thực hành trả lời câu hỏi IELTS Speaking Part 1 về chia sẻ kiến thức với giáo viên hướng dẫn

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần quan trọng nhất trong IELTS Speaking, chiếm thời gian 3-4 phút bao gồm 1 phút chuẩn bị và 2 phút nói. Đây là phần độc thoại nơi bạn phải nói liên tục về một chủ đề cụ thể mà không bị examiner ngắt lời.

Đặc điểm của Part 2 là bạn sẽ nhận được một cue card với đề bài và các bullet points hướng dẫn. Bạn có quyền sử dụng giấy và bút để ghi chú trong 1 phút chuẩn bị.

Chiến lược hiệu quả cho Part 2:

• Sử dụng trọn vẹn 1 phút để ghi chú keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Đảm bảo nói đủ 2 phút, tối thiểu là 1.5 phút
• Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trên cue card
• Với đề kể về quá khứ, nhớ dùng thì quá khứ một cách nhất quán
• Sử dụng signposting language để chuyển ý mạch lạc

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Không tận dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị, vội vàng bắt đầu
• Nói quá ngắn, dưới 1.5 phút
• Bỏ sót một số bullet points hoặc phần “explain”
• Không duy trì được tense consistency
• Dùng quá nhiều filler words như “um”, “uh”

Cue Card

Describe A Time When You Shared Your Knowledge Or Expertise With Others

You should say:

• What knowledge or expertise you shared
• Who you shared it with
• When and where this happened
• And explain how you felt about sharing this knowledge

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an experience/event – kể về một trải nghiệm cụ thể trong quá khứ

Thì động từ: Chủ yếu là thì quá khứ đơn và quá khứ tiếp diễn vì đây là sự kiện đã xảy ra

Bullet points phải cover:

• What: Kiến thức hoặc chuyên môn gì bạn đã chia sẻ – cần specific, không quá chung chung
• Who: Ai là người nhận kiến thức – có thể là một người, một nhóm, học sinh, đồng nghiệp, bạn bè
• When/Where: Bối cảnh thời gian và địa điểm – giúp tạo scene cho câu chuyện
• Explain: Cảm xúc và suy nghĩ của bạn – đây là phần quan trọng nhất để ghi điểm cao, cần elaborate về feelings, reflections, và significance

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần này thường chiếm 30-40% thời gian nói của bạn. Đây là nơi bạn thể hiện depth of thinking, emotional intelligence, và khả năng reflect. Đừng chỉ nói “I felt happy” mà hãy giải thích tại sao, tác động của trải nghiệm đó như thế nào, và bạn học được gì.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about a time when I taught my cousin how to use social media safely. This happened about six months ago during summer vacation.

My cousin is 14 years old and she had just got her first smartphone. Her parents were worried because they didn’t know much about social media, so they asked me to help her. We met at my house one afternoon and I spent about two hours showing her different things.

First, I explained to her about privacy settings on Facebook and Instagram. I showed her how to make her account private and how to control who can see her posts. Then I talked about the dangers of sharing personal information online, like her address or phone number. I also taught her how to recognize fake accounts and suspicious messages.

I used real examples to make it easier to understand. For example, I showed her some fake friend requests I had received and explained how to identify them. I also told her about some common online scams that young people should watch out for.

During the session, my cousin asked many questions and she was very interested in learning. I tried to answer everything clearly and gave her some tips about what to do if someone bothers her online.

I felt really good about helping her because I think internet safety is very important, especially for young people. I was happy that I could use my knowledge to protect her from potential dangers. Her parents also thanked me a lot, which made me feel proud. After that day, my cousin sometimes messages me when she’s not sure about something online, and I’m always happy to help her.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Nói khá trôi chảy với sequencing rõ ràng (First, Then, During, After). Có sử dụng basic linking words nhưng chưa đa dạng. Câu chuyện có structure logic.
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng adequate và relevant (privacy settings, personal information, fake accounts, online scams, internet safety). Có một số collocations tốt nhưng vẫn còn nhiều từ đơn giản như “really good”, “a lot”.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Sử dụng đúng past tense consistently. Có mix của simple và complex sentences. Một số cấu trúc như relative clauses và conditionals nhưng chưa nhiều. Ít lỗi ngữ pháp.
Pronunciation	6-7	Rõ ràng và dễ hiểu. Có khả năng phát âm từ đa âm tiết nhưng intonation chưa varied nhiều.

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points
• ✅ Có chronological order rõ ràng, dễ follow
• ✅ Đưa ra được ví dụ cụ thể (fake friend requests)
• ✅ Thời gian nói đủ 2 phút

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Từ vựng chưa sophisticated, thiếu idioms và advanced expressions
• ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đa dạng, chủ yếu là simple và compound sentences
• ⚠️ Phần “explain feelings” còn surface-level, chưa show depth of reflection

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to share an experience about when I conducted a workshop on digital marketing for small business owners in my community. This took place about eight months ago at our local community center.

The backstory is quite interesting. I’ve been working in digital marketing for nearly five years, and I’d noticed that many small businesses in my neighborhood were struggling to establish an online presence. They had great products but lacked the know-how to reach customers through social media and online platforms. So I volunteered to organize a free workshop to help them bridge this knowledge gap.

The session attracted about 15 participants, mostly owners of family-run businesses like cafes, bookshops, and handicraft stores. I designed a comprehensive two-hour workshop covering the fundamentals of social media marketing, including how to create engaging content, understand target audiences, and use basic analytics tools.

What made the workshop particularly effective was my approach. Rather than just delivering a theoretical lecture, I used their actual businesses as case studies. For instance, I helped the owner of a local bakery brainstorm content ideas for her Instagram account and showed her how to use hashtags strategically. We also did some hands-on activities where participants practiced creating posts and analyzing their competitors’ online strategies.

The atmosphere was incredibly interactive and collaborative. People were sharing their challenges and learning from each other’s experiences, which created a real sense of community. Some participants who were more tech-savvy even started helping others, which was wonderful to witness.

Looking back, I felt immensely satisfied with the experience. It was rewarding not just because I could pass on my expertise, but because I saw the immediate impact it had. Several participants told me they felt much more confident about using social media for their businesses. One café owner even messaged me a few weeks later to say she’d gained 200 new followers and had seen a noticeable increase in customers. That kind of tangible result made all the preparation worthwhile and reinforced my belief in the importance of knowledge sharing within communities.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Nói trôi chảy với hesitation rất ít. Sử dụng đa dạng linking devices (The backstory is, For instance, Looking back). Có clear progression và logical development của ideas.
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Vocabulary range rộng với nhiều less common words và collocations (conducted a workshop, establish an online presence, bridge this knowledge gap, hands-on activities, tangible result). Flexible và precise trong word choice.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Đa dạng structures: relative clauses, participle clauses, passive voice. Mix của tenses phù hợp (past simple, past perfect, past continuous). Câu phức tạp nhưng accurate.
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear và natural với appropriate stress patterns. Good intonation để emphasize key points. Phát âm tốt các từ đa âm tiết.

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“taught”, “showed her”, “real examples”	“conducted a workshop”, “bridge this knowledge gap”, “case studies”, “tangible result”
Grammar	“I explained to her about privacy settings”	“I’d noticed that many small businesses were struggling to establish an online presence”
Ideas	Basic explanation về feelings	Deeper reflection với specific impacts và philosophical insight về community knowledge sharing

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to recount a particularly memorable experience from last year when I had the privilege of mentoring a group of university students in data visualization and statistical analysis – areas I’ve specialized in throughout my ten-year career in market research.

The genesis of this opportunity was somewhat serendipitous. I’d been invited to give a guest lecture at my alma mater, and during the Q&A session, several students expressed frustration about the disconnect between their theoretical coursework and the practical skills demanded by employers. Sensing their genuine eagerness to learn, I offered to run a series of intensive weekend workshops completely pro bono.

What transpired over those six weeks was genuinely transformative, not just for the students but for me as well. I worked with a cohort of twelve final-year students who were embarking on their thesis projects. My objective wasn’t merely to teach them technical proficiency in tools like R and Tableau, but to help them develop a more analytical mindset – to think critically about data storytelling and how to extract meaningful insights from complex datasets.

The methodology I employed was deliberately hands-on and iterative. Each week, students would bring their actual thesis data, and we’d work through it collectively. I’d demonstrate techniques, then watch them apply these in real-time, troubleshooting as issues arose. What made this approach particularly effective was the peer learning dynamic it fostered. Students would critique each other’s visualizations, suggest alternative approaches, and build on each other’s ideas – creating this wonderful collaborative environment where learning became organic and multidirectional.

One moment that stands out vividly was when a student who’d been struggling with confidence managed to create an exceptionally sophisticated interactive dashboard. The pride and disbelief on her face was palpable, and watching her present it to the group with newfound assurance was genuinely moving.

Reflecting on this experience, I found it profoundly fulfilling on multiple levels. On a practical level, I had the satisfaction of knowing I’d equipped these students with marketable skills that would serve them well in their careers. Several have since secured competitive positions at leading firms, which is tremendously gratifying. But beyond that, the experience rekindled my own enthusiasm for my field. Teaching forces you to revisit fundamentals, to articulate the ‘why’ behind the ‘how’, which deepened my own understanding in unexpected ways.

Moreover, it reinforced my conviction about the multiplicative nature of knowledge sharing. Each of those twelve students will likely mentor others in turn, creating this ripple effect that extends far beyond my initial contribution. There’s something quite profound about being part of that knowledge transmission chain, about contributing to a legacy that transcends individual achievement.

The experience also made me more cognizant of the responsibility that comes with expertise. Knowledge held too tightly loses its value, but when shared generously, it has this remarkable capacity to multiply and evolve. It’s an insight that has shaped how I approach not just my professional development but my broader role within my community.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Hoàn toàn fluent và coherent. Sophisticated cohesive devices (The genesis of, What transpired, Reflecting on). Perfect logical flow với clear development từ context → actions → results → deeper reflection.
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Exceptional range với idiomatic usage (serendipitous, pro bono, stands out vividly, palpable, rekindled). Precise và sophisticated word choice (multiplicative nature, cognizant, transcends). Natural collocations (theoretical coursework, hands-on and iterative, ripple effect).
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range của structures: inversion, participle clauses, cleft sentences, mixed conditionals. Completely accurate với complex sentences. Natural use of advanced grammar không forced.
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Sustained use của features như stress, intonation, connected speech một cách natural và expressive. Clear articulation của complex, multi-syllable academic vocabulary.

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói không có hesitation, có rhythm tự nhiên với varied pacing để emphasize key points. Sử dụng sophisticated discourse markers như “The genesis of”, “What transpired”, “Reflecting on this experience” mà không làm gián đoạn flow.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• “serendipitous” – Từ học thuật tinh tế thay vì “lucky” hoặc “by chance”
• “pro bono” – Latin phrase thể hiện knowledge về professional terminology
• “palpable” – Abstract adjective showing precision trong describing emotions
• “multiplicative nature” – Conceptual language thể hiện sophisticated thinking
• “transcends individual achievement” – Philosophical vocabulary cho thấy depth

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Participle clauses: “Sensing their genuine eagerness to learn, I offered…”
• Cleft sentences: “What made this approach particularly effective was…”
• Complex noun phrases: “the disconnect between their theoretical coursework and the practical skills demanded by employers”
• Inversion: “Knowledge held too tightly loses its value”

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Không chỉ describe sự kiện mà còn philosophize về nature của knowledge sharing, concept của “ripple effect”, và personal transformation. Show metacognition – suy nghĩ về quá trình suy nghĩ của chính mình.

Người hướng dẫn đang dạy workshop về chia sẻ kiến thức cho nhóm học viên IELTS Speaking Part 2

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner thường hỏi 1-2 câu ngắn sau khi bạn hoàn thành Part 2 để kết thúc phần này một cách tự nhiên trước khi chuyển sang Part 3.

Question 1: Do you still keep in touch with those people you helped?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, some of them still contact me sometimes when they have questions. We are connected on social media and they update me about their progress.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely. I maintain regular contact with several of them, particularly through a LinkedIn group we established. It’s been rewarding to witness their professional trajectories – some have even surpassed my own achievements in certain areas, which is genuinely thrilling to see.

---

Question 2: Would you do something similar again in the future?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, definitely. I really enjoyed the experience and I think it’s important to help others. If I have time, I would like to organize more workshops or teaching sessions.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Without a doubt. The experience was so enriching that I’ve actually made it a regular commitment. I now dedicate a few hours each month to pro bono mentoring, and I’m currently exploring partnerships with local organizations to scale up these initiatives. There’s something intrinsically motivating about contributing to others’ growth.

---

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần thách thức nhất trong IELTS Speaking, kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi thảo luận sâu và trừu tượng liên quan đến chủ đề của Part 2. Đây là nơi examiner đánh giá khả năng phân tích, so sánh, đưa ra quan điểm và lập luận của bạn.

Đặc điểm của Part 3:

• Câu hỏi mang tính trừu tượng, yêu cầu suy nghĩ về social issues, trends, comparisons
• Không còn là personal experiences mà là general opinions và analysis
• Đòi hỏi vocabulary học thuật và abstract concepts
• Cần structure rõ ràng với supporting reasons và examples

Yêu cầu để đạt điểm cao:

• Phân tích vấn đề từ nhiều góc độ
• Đưa ra quan điểm có lý lẽ với supporting evidence
• Sử dụng examples từ society, không chỉ từ cá nhân
• Thừa nhận complexity và nuances của vấn đề
• Show critical thinking và balanced view

Chiến lược trả lời:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời thành 3-5 câu hoặc hơn
• Sử dụng discourse markers để structure ideas
• Đưa ra reasons, examples, và sometimes counterarguments
• Compare và contrast khi phù hợp
• Acknowledge different perspectives

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn, thiếu elaboration
• Chỉ đưa ra opinion mà không có supporting reasons
• Thiếu từ vựng abstract và academic
• Không structure câu trả lời một cách logic
• Speaking quá personal thay vì general

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Education and Knowledge Transfer

---

Question 1: Why do you think some people are better at teaching than others?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause and Effect – giải thích nguyên nhân
• Key words: “some people”, “better at teaching” – cần identify qualities và factors
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify 2-3 main reasons → Explain each với examples → Conclude hoặc add nuance

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think some people are naturally better at teaching because of their personality. People who are patient and good at explaining things can teach well. Also, if someone really understands a subject deeply, they can teach it better because they know how to make it simple. Experience also matters – teachers who have taught for many years know how to deal with different students and their problems.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có identify được 3 reasons (personality, understanding, experience) nhưng còn shallow
• Vocabulary: Basic words như “good at”, “know how”, “deal with”
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response nhưng thiếu depth và sophisticated language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Well, I’d argue that teaching prowess stems from a confluence of factors, both innate and acquired.

First and foremost, there’s the element of emotional intelligence – exceptional teachers possess this remarkable ability to read their audience, to sense when comprehension is lagging, and to adapt their approach accordingly. They’re attuned to the subtle non-verbal cues that indicate confusion or disengagement, which allows them to recalibrate in real-time.

Beyond that, the best teachers have what I’d call pedagogical empathy – they can viscerally remember what it was like to not understand something, which prevents them from making that common mistake of assuming knowledge or skipping foundational steps. This cognitive flexibility enables them to break down complex concepts into digestible components and to employ multiple explanatory approaches until something resonates.

There’s also the passion factor that cannot be overstated. When someone is genuinely enthusiastic about their subject matter, that enthusiasm is infectious. It transforms the learning experience from a mere information transfer into something more dynamic and memorable. Students can intuitively distinguish between someone who’s going through the motions and someone who’s truly invested in their growth.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated với clear signposting (First and foremost, Beyond that, There’s also). Each point được develop fully với explanation và elaboration.
• Vocabulary: Exceptional range (teaching prowess, confluence of factors, pedagogical empathy, cognitive flexibility, viscerally remember, going through the motions)
• Grammar: Complex structures (relative clauses, infinitives, participles, noun phrases)
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis touching on psychology, pedagogy, và emotional aspects

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Well, I’d argue that…”, “First and foremost”, “Beyond that”
• Tentative language: “I’d call”, “I’d argue that”, “to some extent”
• Abstract nouns: teaching prowess, confluence, pedagogical empathy, cognitive flexibility

---

Question 2: How has the way people share knowledge changed with technology?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare and Contrast – so sánh past vs present
• Key words: “changed”, “with technology” – cần discuss transformation
• Cách tiếp cận: Describe traditional methods → Explain modern methods → Discuss implications/impacts

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Technology has changed knowledge sharing a lot. In the past, people could only learn from teachers in classrooms or from books. Now, we can learn anything online through YouTube videos, online courses, and websites. It’s much easier and faster to get information. Also, anyone can share their knowledge now, not just experts or teachers. However, sometimes the quality of information online is not very good because anyone can post anything.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic comparison với some valid points
• Vocabulary: Simple words “a lot”, “much easier”, “not very good”
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main ideas nhưng lacks sophistication và depth of analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

The digital revolution has fundamentally transformed the landscape of knowledge dissemination in ways that would have been inconceivable just a generation ago.

Traditionally, knowledge sharing was inherently hierarchical and geographically constrained – you learned from the expert in your vicinity, whether that was a teacher, a master craftsperson, or a local authority. Information flowed vertically from those with credentials to those without, and access was often predicated on physical proximity or institutional affiliation.

In stark contrast, we now exist in what some scholars call the “democratization of knowledge” era. Platforms like YouTube, Coursera, and even Twitter have dismantled these traditional barriers, creating horizontal knowledge networks where anyone with expertise – credentialed or otherwise – can reach a global audience instantaneously. A teenager in rural Vietnam can learn quantum physics from MIT professors or master coding through self-directed online learning, which represents a paradigm shift in educational accessibility.

However, this transformation is decidedly double-edged. While we’ve gained unprecedented access, we’ve also encountered the challenge of information overload and the erosion of authoritative sources. The democratization that empowers genuine expertise to reach wider audiences also enables the proliferation of misinformation. Discerning credible knowledge from pseudo-expertise has become an essential skill in itself.

Moreover, there’s been a fundamental shift in the temporality of knowledge sharing. Where learning was once a synchronous, scheduled activity – you attended class at specific times – it’s now overwhelmingly asynchronous and self-paced. This offers tremendous flexibility but also requires greater self-discipline and intrinsic motivation, skills not everyone possesses equally.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated với clear past-present comparison, then deeper analysis của implications. Multiple dimensions explored (hierarchy, geography, credibility, temporality).
• Vocabulary: Academic và precise (inconceivable, hierarchical, predicated on, paradigm shift, decidedly double-edged, proliferation of misinformation, temporality)
• Grammar: Full range của complex structures (relative clauses, participle phrases, noun phrases, passive constructions)
• Critical Thinking: Balanced view acknowledging both positive và negative aspects, shows awareness của scholarly discourse (“some scholars call”)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Traditionally”, “In stark contrast”, “However”, “Moreover”
• Tentative language: “some scholars call”, “would have been”
• Abstract nouns: landscape of knowledge dissemination, democratization, paradigm shift, proliferation, temporality

---

Theme 2: Workplace Learning and Skills Development

Question 3: Should companies invest more in training their employees, or should employees be responsible for their own development?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Compare two sides
• Key words: “companies invest” vs “employees be responsible”
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge both perspectives → Give balanced view → State your position with reasons

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think both companies and employees should share the responsibility. Companies should provide training because they benefit from skilled workers and it helps the business grow. But employees should also take initiative to learn new things because it helps their career. In today’s world, technology changes fast, so both sides need to work together to keep skills updated.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Balanced view nhưng còn general
• Vocabulary: Basic expressions “should provide”, “take initiative”, “helps their career”
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Reasonable points nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated argumentation

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

This is quite a nuanced question that I think requires a more sophisticated answer than simply advocating for one side.

From a pragmatic standpoint, I’d argue there needs to be shared responsibility, but with contextual flexibility. Companies that want to remain competitive and retain talent have a vested interest in upskilling their workforce. When organizations invest in comprehensive training programs, they’re not just enhancing individual capabilities – they’re cultivating institutional knowledge and fostering loyalty. Employees who feel their professional development is valued are significantly more likely to remain committed to the organization, which mitigates the costly cycle of turnover and recruitment.

That said, overreliance on employer-provided training can foster a dangerous complacency. In today’s rapidly evolving economy, where entire job categories can become obsolete within a decade, individuals need to take ownership of their continuous learning trajectory. The concept of “lifelong learning” isn’t just a trendy buzzword – it’s an economic imperative. Those who wait passively for their employers to spoon-feed them skills may find themselves woefully unprepared for inevitable market shifts.

The optimal model, in my view, is a symbiotic relationship where companies provide the foundational infrastructure – things like learning platforms, mentorship programs, and allocated development time – while employees bring the intrinsic motivation and self-direction to leverage these resources effectively. It’s rather like providing someone with a gym membership versus actually doing the workouts – both elements are indispensable for results.

We should also acknowledge that this dynamic varies considerably across industries and organizational scales. Startups and SMEs may lack the resources for elaborate training programs, making self-directed learning more critical, whereas large corporations with deeper pockets have less excuse for neglecting employee development. Similarly, industries experiencing rapid technological disruption require more aggressive upskilling initiatives than more stable sectors.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptional organization with thesis statement, multiple supporting arguments, nuanced considerations, và sector-specific analysis
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated range (nuanced question, vested interest, cultivating institutional knowledge, mitigates the costly cycle, symbiotic relationship, indispensable)
• Grammar: Full range demonstrating flexibility và accuracy
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis considering business perspective, employee perspective, economic context, và industry variations. Uses metaphor effectively (gym membership analogy).

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “From a pragmatic standpoint”, “That said”, “The optimal model”, “We should also acknowledge”
• Tentative language: “I’d argue”, “in my view”, “may find themselves”
• Abstract nouns: complacency, trajectory, imperative, symbiotic relationship, infrastructure

Cuộc thảo luận sâu về chia sẻ kiến thức trong IELTS Speaking Part 3 giữa examiner và thí sinh

---

Theme 3: Social Impact and Knowledge Sharing

Question 4: Do you think people today are more willing to share their knowledge compared to the past?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Historical comparison
• Key words: “more willing”, “compared to the past”
• Cách tiếp cận: Consider historical context → Examine current trends → Explain factors driving changes → Provide balanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think people today share knowledge more easily. With the internet and social media, it’s very convenient to share information. People post tutorials, tips, and advice online for free. In the past, knowledge was more limited to books and schools, so not everyone could access it. Now anyone can learn almost anything online, which shows people are more open to sharing what they know.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Simple comparison với basic reasons
• Vocabulary: Common words “very convenient”, “more open”, “almost anything”
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses question adequately nhưng thiếu depth và critical analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

This is a fascinating question that I think reveals some interesting paradoxes about modern society.

On the surface, it would appear that we’re living in an unprecedented age of knowledge sharing. The sheer volume of information being freely disseminated through blogs, podcasts, YouTube channels, and open-source platforms is staggering. There’s this cultural shift toward what’s been called the “sharing economy” – people are remarkably generous about dispensing advice, tutorial content, and even proprietary expertise that they’ve spent years developing.

However, I’d caution against accepting this at face value. While the mechanisms for sharing have certainly proliferated, I’m not entirely convinced that the underlying motivations have changed as dramatically. Historically, knowledge sharing often occurred within tight-knit communities – guilds, apprenticeship systems, scholarly circles – where there was a strong sense of collective benefit and reciprocal obligation. People shared because they were part of a cohesive social fabric that valued mutual advancement.

In contrast, much of today’s knowledge sharing is mediated by different incentives – personal branding, audience building, monetization potential. When someone creates a comprehensive tutorial on YouTube, yes, they’re sharing knowledge, but they’re also cultivating a following, generating ad revenue, or establishing themselves as thought leaders. This doesn’t negate the value of what’s being shared, but it does complicate the narrative of pure altruism.

Moreover, we need to distinguish between information sharing and genuine knowledge transfer. There’s an abundance of content but not always depth of understanding. The soundbite culture of social media often privileges surface-level tips over deep expertise, and the attention economy rewards easily digestible content rather than comprehensive education.

That said, there are genuinely heartening trends – the open-source movement, Wikipedia, academic preprint servers – that represent a democratization of knowledge that’s qualitatively different from historical patterns. These initiatives are driven by genuine commitment to collective advancement rather than individual gain.

So to answer more directly, I’d say people today have far greater capacity and platforms for sharing knowledge, and many do so generously, but the underlying willingness is perhaps more complex and mixed in motivation than we might initially assume. It’s neither purely better nor worse than the past – just different in character and scale.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated với thesis-antithesis-synthesis approach. Acknowledges surface appearance, then critiques it, provides historical context, examines modern motivations, distinguishes between information vs knowledge, acknowledges positive trends, và provides nuanced conclusion
• Vocabulary: Exceptional range (unprecedented, disseminated, at face value, mediated by, negate the value, soundbite culture, heartening trends, qualitatively different)
• Grammar: Full range với complex embedding, conditionals, participle constructions
• Critical Thinking: Highly sophisticated showing ability to challenge assumptions, examine multiple dimensions, acknowledge paradoxes, và provide balanced assessment. Shows awareness of academic concepts (sharing economy, attention economy, open-source movement).

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “On the surface”, “However, I’d caution against”, “In contrast”, “Moreover”, “That said”, “So to answer more directly”
• Tentative language: “I think”, “I’m not entirely convinced”, “I’d say”, “perhaps”
• Abstract nouns: paradoxes, mechanisms, underlying motivations, reciprocal obligation, soundbite culture, democratization

---

Question 5: What are the potential dangers of sharing too much information online?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Problem identification
• Key words: “potential dangers”, “too much information”, “online”
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify main dangers → Explain each với examples/consequences → Consider broader implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

There are several dangers when people share too much online. First, privacy is a big problem – people’s personal information can be stolen or misused. Hackers can use this information for identity theft or fraud. Second, what you post online stays there forever, so it might affect your reputation in the future. For example, employers often check social media before hiring someone. Also, sharing too much can make you a target for scams or cyberbullying.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists dangers clearly với basic explanations
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng common (big problem, stays there forever, make you a target)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points nhưng lacks sophisticated analysis và nuanced language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

This is an increasingly pressing concern as we navigate the complexities of our hyper-connected digital lives, and I think the dangers operate on multiple interconnected levels.

At the most immediate level, there’s the tangible security risk. When people indiscriminately share personal details – their location patterns, family relationships, financial status, daily routines – they’re essentially constructing a detailed profile that malicious actors can exploit. We’ve seen cases where burglars use social media to determine when homes are empty, or where stalkers piece together someone’s whereabouts through seemingly innocuous posts. The cumulative effect of these digital breadcrumbs can be far more revealing than people realize.

Beyond physical security, there’s the dimension of reputational vulnerability. The internet has an elephant’s memory – things posted in a moment of poor judgment or during different life phases can resurface years later with potentially devastating consequences. We’re essentially living with permanent digital records of our most unguarded moments, yet our social norms around privacy haven’t fully adapted to this reality. What felt like harmless sharing within a specific context can be weaponized or misconstrued when divorced from that context.

There’s also what I’d call the “aggregation risk.” Individual pieces of information might seem innocuous in isolation, but when aggregated and analyzed by sophisticated algorithms, they can reveal patterns and vulnerabilities that individuals never intended to expose. This is how data brokers construct remarkably detailed profiles used for targeted manipulation – whether through advertising, political campaigning, or more nefarious purposes.

More subtly, I think there’s a psychological dimension that’s often overlooked. The performative nature of social media sharing creates pressure for constant self-disclosure and curated authenticity – which is somewhat oxymoronic. This can lead to what researchers call “context collapse,” where we’re simultaneously performing for multiple audiences – family, colleagues, friends from different life stages – creating authentic connection with none. The danger here is more existential – a kind of erosion of genuine privacy and the reflective solitude necessary for authentic identity formation.

We should also consider the epistemic dangers – the way oversimplified information sharing can contribute to polarization and misinformation spread. When complex issues are reduced to shareable soundbites without nuance, we collectively degrade our capacity for sophisticated thinking about important topics.

Addressing these dangers requires multi-layered solutions – better digital literacy education, more robust platform accountability, regulatory frameworks that balance innovation with protection, and perhaps most importantly, cultural shifts in how we think about privacy and appropriate boundaries in digital spaces.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptional organization examining multiple dimensions (security, reputational, aggregation, psychological, epistemic) với each được develop comprehensively. Concludes với solutions dimension.
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (indiscriminately share, malicious actors, digital breadcrumbs, reputational vulnerability, aggregation risk, performative nature, context collapse, epistemic dangers, multi-layered solutions)
• Grammar: Full range demonstrating complete flexibility: complex noun phrases, participle clauses, relative clauses, passive constructions, advanced conditionals
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis showing awareness of research (“researchers call”), ability to identify subtle/overlooked dimensions, consideration of both immediate và long-term implications, và solution-oriented thinking

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “At the most immediate level”, “Beyond physical security”, “More subtly”, “We should also consider”
• Tentative language: “I think”, “what I’d call”, “somewhat oxymoronic”
• Abstract nouns: hyper-connected digital lives, reputational vulnerability, aggregation risk, context collapse, epistemic dangers, authentic identity formation

---

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
share one’s expertise	verb phrase	/ʃeər wʌnz ˌekspɜːˈtiːz/	chia sẻ chuyên môn của mình	I had the opportunity to share my expertise in digital marketing with small business owners.	share knowledge/skills/insights, pass on expertise, impart expertise
mentor	verb/noun	/ˈmentɔː(r)/	hướng dẫn, làm người cố vấn	I mentored a group of junior colleagues on data analysis techniques.	mentor someone, act as a mentor, provide mentorship, mentoring relationship
impart knowledge	verb phrase	/ɪmˈpɑːt ˈnɒlɪdʒ/	truyền đạt kiến thức	Teachers play a crucial role in imparting knowledge to the next generation.	impart skills/wisdom/information, effectively impart
pedagogical	adjective	/ˌpedəˈɡɒdʒɪkl/	thuộc về sư phạm, giáo dục học	Good teachers employ various pedagogical approaches to suit different learning styles.	pedagogical methods/approaches/techniques, pedagogical knowledge
knowledge transfer	noun phrase	/ˈnɒlɪdʒ trænsˈfɜː(r)/	sự chuyển giao kiến thức	Effective knowledge transfer is essential for organizational continuity.	facilitate knowledge transfer, knowledge transfer process, barriers to knowledge transfer
hands-on learning	noun phrase	/hændz ɒn ˈlɜːnɪŋ/	học tập thực hành	The workshop emphasized hands-on learning rather than theoretical lectures.	hands-on experience/training/approach, provide hands-on learning
grasp a concept	verb phrase	/ɡrɑːsp ə ˈkɒnsept/	nắm bắt một khái niệm	It took her a while to fully grasp the concept of compound interest.	quickly/fully grasp, struggle to grasp, help someone grasp
consolidate understanding	verb phrase	/kənˈsɒlɪdeɪt ˌʌndəˈstændɪŋ/	củng cố sự hiểu biết	Teaching others is an excellent way to consolidate your own understanding.	consolidate knowledge/learning/skills, help consolidate
bridge the knowledge gap	verb phrase	/brɪdʒ ðə ˈnɒlɪdʒ ɡæp/	thu hẹp khoảng cách kiến thức	The training program aimed to bridge the knowledge gap between theory and practice.	bridge the gap/divide, help bridge, successfully bridge
foster learning	verb phrase	/ˈfɒstə(r) ˈlɜːnɪŋ/	thúc đẩy, nuôi dưỡng việc học	An open environment fosters learning and intellectual curiosity.	foster development/growth/understanding, actively foster
cultivate skills	verb phrase	/ˈkʌltɪveɪt skɪlz/	trau dồi kỹ năng	Mentorship programs help cultivate essential professional skills.	cultivate abilities/talents/expertise, carefully cultivate
transmit knowledge	verb phrase	/trænzˈmɪt ˈnɒlɪdʒ/	truyền tải kiến thức	Experienced workers can transmit valuable knowledge to newcomers.	transmit information/skills/wisdom, effectively transmit
facilitate understanding	verb phrase	/fəˈsɪlɪteɪt ˌʌndəˈstændɪŋ/	tạo điều kiện thuận lợi cho sự hiểu biết	Visual aids can greatly facilitate understanding of complex topics.	facilitate learning/communication/discussion, help facilitate
acquire new skills	verb phrase	/əˈkwaɪə(r) njuː skɪlz/	tiếp thu kỹ năng mới	The course helped participants acquire new skills in project management.	acquire knowledge/expertise/competencies, rapidly acquire
upskill	verb	/ˈʌpskɪl/	nâng cao kỹ năng	Companies need to invest in upskilling their workforce to stay competitive.	upskill employees/workers, upskill and reskill, upskilling initiatives
domain expertise	noun phrase	/dəʊˈmeɪn ˌekspɜːˈtiːz/	chuyên môn trong lĩnh vực cụ thể	She has significant domain expertise in cybersecurity.	possess domain expertise, develop domain expertise, leverage domain expertise
peer learning	noun phrase	/pɪə(r) ˈlɜːnɪŋ/	học hỏi từ đồng nghiệp	Peer learning can be just as valuable as formal instruction.	peer learning opportunities, facilitate peer learning, peer learning environment
knowledge dissemination	noun phrase	/ˈnɒlɪdʒ dɪˌsemɪˈneɪʃn/	sự phổ biến kiến thức	The internet has revolutionized knowledge dissemination globally.	knowledge dissemination channels, facilitate knowledge dissemination
capacity building	noun phrase	/kəˈpæsəti ˈbɪldɪŋ/	xây dựng năng lực	The NGO focuses on capacity building in rural communities.	capacity building programs/initiatives/efforts, invest in capacity building
intellectual capital	noun phrase	/ˌɪntəˈlektʃuəl ˈkæpɪtl/	vốn trí tuệ	Organizations must protect and leverage their intellectual capital.	develop intellectual capital, intellectual capital management

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
pass the torch	truyền lại trách nhiệm/kiến thức cho thế hệ sau	Experienced professionals need to pass the torch to younger generations through mentoring.	7.5-9
lightbulb moment	khoảnh khắc chợt hiểu ra	Watching her have that lightbulb moment when the concept finally clicked was incredibly rewarding.	7.5-8
learn the ropes	học cách làm việc, làm quen với công việc	New employees need guidance to learn the ropes of the organization.	7-8
knowledge is power	tri thức là sức mạnh	The saying “knowledge is power” is more relevant than ever in today’s information age.	6-7
stand on the shoulders of giants	học hỏi từ những người đi trước	Scientists stand on the shoulders of giants, building upon previous discoveries.	8-9
spoon-feed information	đưa thông tin một cách thụ động, không tư duy	Good teachers don’t spoon-feed information; they encourage critical thinking.	7.5-8
reinvent the wheel	làm lại việc đã có, lãng phí công sức	Knowledge sharing prevents people from reinventing the wheel unnecessarily.	7-8
trial and error	thử và sai, học qua thực hành	Sometimes hands-on learning through trial and error is more effective than theoretical instruction.	6-7
steep learning curve	quá trình học tập khó khăn, phải học nhiều trong thời gian ngắn	The software has a steep learning curve, so I created tutorials to help others.	7.5-8
food for thought	điều đáng suy ngẫm	Her presentation on collaborative learning provided plenty of food for thought.	7-8
in someone’s shoes	đặt mình vào vị trí người khác	Good mentors can put themselves in their students’ shoes to understand their struggles.	6-7
the penny dropped	chợt hiểu ra (British English)	I could see the moment when the penny dropped and he finally understood the formula.	7.5-8

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Khi cần một chút thời gian suy nghĩ hoặc để transition tự nhiên
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi muốn đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc correct một assumption
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi muốn thể hiện sự chân thật trong opinion
• 📝 I’d say that… – Cách tentative để đưa ra quan điểm
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Thể hiện đây là personal view
• 📝 The way I see it,… – Nhấn mạnh subjective opinion

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm điểm bổ sung
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, bổ sung điểm mạnh hơn
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến (thường là điểm quan trọng)
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra còn
• 📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó (formal hơn)
• 📝 Furthermore,… – Hơn nữa (academic)

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng cần xem xét
• 📝 Having said that,… – Nói như vậy nhưng… (để contrast)
• 📝 That said,… – Đã nói như vậy nhưng
• 📝 Nevertheless,… – Tuy nhiên (formal)
• 📝 In contrast,… – Ngược lại

Để giải thích và làm rõ:

• 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác
• 📝 To put it simply,… – Nói đơn giản là
• 📝 Let me put it this way,… – Để tôi nói theo cách này
• 📝 To clarify,… – Để làm rõ

Để đưa ra ví dụ:

• 📝 For instance,… – Ví dụ như (formal)
• 📝 Take… for example,… – Lấy… làm ví dụ
• 📝 A case in point is… – Một trường hợp điển hình là
• 📝 To illustrate this point,… – Để minh họa điểm này

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, xét tất cả
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Sau cùng
• 📝 In the final analysis,… – Xét cho cùng (formal)
• 📝 To sum up,… – Tóm lại

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional:

• Formula: If + past perfect, would/could + infinitive
• Ví dụ: “If I hadn’t learned from experienced mentors, I wouldn’t be able to share this knowledge effectively today.”
• Khi nào dùng: Diễn tả past action có impact lên present situation

Inversion after negative adverbials:

• Formula: Never/Rarely/Seldom + auxiliary + subject + verb
• Ví dụ: “Rarely have I encountered someone so passionate about sharing their expertise with others.”
• Khi nào dùng: Để nhấn mạnh và tạo formal tone (Band 8-9)

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

• Formula: , which/who/where + clause,
• Ví dụ: “The workshop, which lasted for six weeks, transformed how the students approached their research.”
• Khi nào dùng: Thêm information không essential nhưng enriching

Reduced relative clauses:

• Formula: noun + participle phrase
• Ví dụ: “The knowledge shared during these sessions has proven invaluable.”
• Khi nào dùng: Để câu ngắn gọn và sophisticated hơn

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive:

• Formula: It is thought/believed/said/considered that…
• Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that peer learning can be as effective as formal instruction.”
• Khi nào dùng: Đưa ra general opinions hoặc established facts

Agent-less passive:

• Formula: be + past participle (without “by…”)
• Ví dụ: “Knowledge should be shared generously rather than hoarded.”
• Khi nào dùng: Focus vào action hơn là doer

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What-clefts:

• Formula: What + subject + verb + is/was…
• Ví dụ: “What I find most rewarding about teaching is seeing students develop confidence.”
• Khi nào dùng: Để emphasize một phần cụ thể của information

It-clefts:

• Formula: It + be + focus + that/who…
• Ví dụ: “It was through mentoring others that I truly consolidated my own understanding.”
• Khi nào dùng: Để highlight một element cụ thể

5. Advanced Verb Patterns:

Causative structures:

• Formula: have/get + object + past participle
• Ví dụ: “The experience had me rethinking my own approach to learning.”
• Khi nào dùng: Express causation một cách sophisticated

Subjunctive mood:

• Formula: It is essential/important/vital that + subject + base verb
• Ví dụ: “It is essential that knowledge be shared across generations.”
• Khi nào dùng: Express necessity hoặc recommendations (formal)

6. Participle Clauses:

Present participle:

• Formula: …ing phrase, main clause
• Ví dụ: “Recognizing their struggle, I adapted my teaching approach to make concepts more accessible.”
• Khi nào dùng: Show simultaneous actions hoặc cause-effect

Perfect participle:

• Formula: Having + past participle, main clause
• Ví dụ: “Having experienced these challenges myself, I could empathize with their difficulties.”
• Khi nào dùng: Show action completed trước main action

Học viên IELTS ghi chép từ vựng và ngữ pháp quan trọng cho chủ đề chia sẻ kiến thức

---

Với bài hướng dẫn chi tiết này, bạn đã được trang bị đầy đủ kiến thức và kỹ năng để tự tin trả lời chủ đề “Describe a time when you shared your knowledge or expertise with others” trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking. Hãy nhớ rằng, chìa khóa để đạt điểm cao không chỉ nằm ở việc học thuộc các bài mẫu, mà là hiểu được tiêu chí chấm điểm, phát triển khả năng tư duy phản biện, và luyện tập thường xuyên để câu trả lời của bạn trở nên tự nhiên và authentic. Chúc bạn thành công trong kỳ thi IELTS sắp tới.