IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe A Decision You Made That Surprised Others” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Mở bài

Chủ đề “Describe A Decision You Made That Surprised Others” là một trong những đề bài thường xuyên xuất hiện trong phần thi IELTS Speaking Part 2, đặc biệt được yêu thích bởi các giám khảo trong các kỳ thi từ năm 2022 đến nay. Theo thống kê từ các trung tâm luyện thi IELTS và phản hồi từ thí sinh, chủ đề này xuất hiện với tần suất cao – khoảng 1-2 lần mỗi tháng tại các trung tâm thi trên toàn thế giới, và khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai vẫn ở mức cao do tính linh hoạt và khả năng đánh giá toàn diện kỹ năng của thí sinh.

Đề bài này đặc biệt thú vị vì nó không chỉ yêu cầu bạn kể về một quyết định, mà còn phải giải thích tại sao quyết định đó lại khiến người khác ngạc nhiên. Điều này đòi hỏi bạn phải thể hiện khả năng phân tích, so sánh kỳ vọng của người khác với hành động thực tế của bạn, đồng thời giải thích động lực sâu xa đằng sau lựa chọn của mình.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được:

• Các câu hỏi thường gặp trong cả 3 Part liên quan đến chủ đề quyết định và sự ngạc nhiên
• Bài mẫu chi tiết theo nhiều band điểm từ 6-7, 7.5-8 đến 8.5-9 với phân tích sâu sắc
• Hơn 50 từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm được giám khảo đánh giá cao
• Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của một IELTS Examiner với 20 năm kinh nghiệm
• Những lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn gọn về đời sống hàng ngày. Đây là phần “khởi động” giúp bạn làm quen với giám khảo và môi trường thi. Chiến lược hiệu quả nhất là trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi trong 1-2 câu đầu, sau đó mở rộng ý bằng lý do, ví dụ hoặc chi tiết cá nhân trong 1-2 câu tiếp theo, tổng cộng khoảng 2-3 câu cho mỗi câu hỏi.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn chỉ “Yes” hoặc “No” mà không mở rộng
• Sử dụng từ vựng đơn giản lặp đi lặp lại như “good”, “bad”, “like”, “don’t like”
• Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
• Nói quá nhanh do căng thẳng, dẫn đến phát âm không rõ ràng

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you find it easy to make decisions?

Question 2: What was the most difficult decision you had to make recently?

Question 3: Do you prefer to make decisions quickly or take your time?

Question 4: Who do you usually ask for advice when making important decisions?

Question 5: Have you ever regretted a decision you made?

Question 6: Do you think young people today make better decisions than in the past?

Question 7: What kinds of decisions do you make every day?

Question 8: Do you prefer to make decisions alone or with others?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

---

Question: Do you find it easy to make decisions?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có dễ hay không
• Giải thích lý do tại sao (phụ thuộc vào loại quyết định, tính cách…)
• Đưa ra ví dụ cụ thể để minh họa

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

It depends on the situation. For small decisions like what to eat or what to wear, I can decide very quickly. But for big decisions like choosing my university major, I need more time to think carefully because they affect my future.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp, có phân loại rõ ràng giữa small và big decisions, có ví dụ cụ thể
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn basic (small, big, think carefully), cấu trúc câu đơn giản, chưa có linking words phức tạp
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời adequate và relevant nhưng thiếu sophistication về vocabulary và grammar. Ý tưởng rõ ràng nhưng cách diễn đạt chưa impressive.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, it really varies depending on the magnitude of the decision. When it comes to trivial choices like selecting a restaurant or picking out an outfit, I’m quite decisive and can make up my mind almost instantly. However, for life-altering decisions such as career moves or major investments, I tend to be more deliberate and weigh up all the pros and cons thoroughly before committing to anything.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng vocabulary chính xác và đa dạng (magnitude, trivial choices, decisive, life-altering, deliberate, weigh up pros and cons), cấu trúc câu phức tạp với “when it comes to” và “before committing”, discourse marker tự nhiên “Well”
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Thể hiện lexical resource xuất sắc với topic-specific vocabulary, grammatical range đa dạng, ý tưởng được phát triển logic và clear với sự phân loại tinh tế giữa các loại quyết định.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• it really varies depending on: tùy thuộc vào, thay đổi theo
• magnitude: tầm quan trọng, quy mô
• trivial choices: những lựa chọn không quan trọng, nhỏ nhặt
• decisive: quyết đoán
• life-altering decisions: những quyết định thay đổi cuộc đời
• deliberate: thận trọng, cân nhắc kỹ
• weigh up the pros and cons: cân nhắc ưu nhược điểm

---

Question: What was the most difficult decision you had to make recently?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu rõ quyết định cụ thể (không nên chung chung)
• Giải thích tại sao khó khăn
• Có thể đề cập briefly đến kết quả hoặc cảm xúc lúc đó

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

The most difficult decision I made recently was choosing between two job offers. One job paid more money but required me to work long hours. The other job had better work-life balance but lower salary. It was hard because both had good and bad points.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Ví dụ cụ thể và realistic, có comparison rõ ràng giữa hai options
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary repetitive (good, bad), thiếu emotional depth, cấu trúc câu đơn giản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Answer đủ chi tiết nhưng chưa sophisticated, thiếu advanced vocabulary và complex sentences.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’d say the toughest decision I’ve grappled with lately was choosing between two job offers last month. One position offered a significantly higher salary but came with demanding working hours and frequent overtime, while the other provided a more balanced lifestyle but considerably less financial compensation. What made it particularly challenging was that I had to prioritize between short-term financial gain and long-term wellbeing, and it felt like a real trade-off with no perfect solution.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary sophisticated và precise (grappled with, significantly higher, demanding working hours, financial compensation, prioritize, trade-off), sử dụng relative clause “what made it particularly challenging was that…”, thể hiện critical thinking về conflict giữa hai values
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates excellent command of vocabulary với topic-specific collocations, complex sentence structures, và ability to express abstract concepts clearly. Có emotional và intellectual depth.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• grapple with: vật lộn với, đối mặt với (khó khăn)
• demanding working hours: giờ làm việc đòi hỏi cao
• financial compensation: đền bù tài chính, lương thưởng
• prioritize: ưu tiên
• short-term financial gain: lợi ích tài chính ngắn hạn
• long-term wellbeing: hạnh phúc lâu dài
• a real trade-off: sự đánh đổi thực sự

Quyết định khó khăn giữa hai lựa chọn công việc với lương cao và work-life balance trong IELTS Speaking

---

Question: Do you prefer to make decisions quickly or take your time?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• State your preference rõ ràng
• Explain why (personality, experience, consequences…)
• Có thể acknowledge rằng có exceptions

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I usually prefer to take my time when making decisions. I like to think about different options and ask other people for their opinions. Sometimes I make quick decisions but only for small things that are not important.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Clear preference, có reason, có qualification về exceptions
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary basic, thiếu specific examples, cấu trúc đơn giản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response nhưng lacks sophistication và depth.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Generally speaking, I’m more of a cautious decision-maker who prefers to take a measured approach rather than rushing into things. I find that sleeping on important decisions helps me gain clarity and avoid impulsive choices that I might regret later. That said, I’ve learned through experience that overthinking can lead to analysis paralysis, so for time-sensitive matters, I try to trust my gut instinct and make the call. It’s really about striking a balance between due diligence and decisive action.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary range xuất sắc (cautious decision-maker, measured approach, sleeping on decisions, analysis paralysis, gut instinct, striking a balance, due diligence), shows self-awareness và learning from experience, acknowledges nuance với “that said” và “it’s about striking a balance”
• Tại sào Band 8-9: Demonstrates mature thinking, sophisticated language, và ability to present balanced view. Sử dụng discourse markers naturally (“Generally speaking”, “That said”), và có clear structure từ preference → reason → exception → conclusion.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• cautious decision-maker: người ra quyết định thận trọng
• take a measured approach: tiếp cận một cách có cân nhắc
• sleep on a decision: suy nghĩ thêm về quyết định (nghĩa đen: ngủ một đêm rồi quyết định)
• impulsive choices: lựa chọn bốc đồng
• analysis paralysis: tình trạng suy nghĩ quá nhiều đến mức không thể quyết định
• time-sensitive matters: vấn đề cấp bách về mặt thời gian
• trust my gut instinct: tin vào trực giác
• strike a balance: tạo sự cân bằng
• due diligence: sự thận trọng, xem xét kỹ lưỡng

Nếu bạn quan tâm đến việc phát triển khả năng tư duy nhanh trong các tình huống khẩn cấp, bạn có thể tham khảo thêm về describe a situation where you had to think quickly để hiểu thêm về cách diễn đạt các tình huống yêu cầu quyết định tức thời một cách ấn tượng.

---

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần quan trọng nhất của bài thi Speaking, chiếm khoảng 3-4 phút với 1 phút chuẩn bị và 2-3 phút nói. Đây là phần độc thoại không bị ngắt, nơi bạn có cơ hội thể hiện khả năng phát triển ý tưởng, sử dụng từ vựng đa dạng và cấu trúc câu phức tạp.

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

• Sử dụng đủ 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi chú keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Ghi chú theo structure: Who/What/When/Where/Why/How + Feelings/Explain
• Nói đủ 2 phút, tốt nhất là 2-2.5 phút để cho thấy fluency
• Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points, đặc biệt là phần “explain” cuối cùng
• Sử dụng past tense cho các câu chuyện đã xảy ra
• Include emotions và personal reflections để câu chuyện sinh động

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Không sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị, vội vàng bắt đầu nói
• Nói dưới 1.5 phút khiến giám khảo phải hỏi thêm câu hỏi
• Bỏ sót bullet point cuối cùng (phần explain quan trọng nhất)
• Kể chuyện thiếu details, quá chung chung
• Dùng vocabulary quá academic không phù hợp với speaking style

Cue Card

Describe a decision you made that surprised others

You should say:

• What the decision was
• When you made this decision
• Who was surprised by your decision
• And explain why they were surprised and how you felt about their reaction

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an event/experience – kể về một quyết định và phản ứng của người khác

Thì động từ: Chủ yếu là Past Simple và Past Continuous vì đây là câu chuyện đã xảy ra trong quá khứ

Bullet points phải cover:

1. What the decision was – Quyết định cụ thể là gì (cần nêu rõ, không chung chung)
2. When you made this decision – Thời điểm, context (có thể brief nhưng cần có)
3. Who was surprised – Ai ngạc nhiên (gia đình, bạn bè, đồng nghiệp…)
4. Explain why they were surprised + your feelings – Đây là phần QUAN TRỌNG NHẤT, cần phát triển kỹ với lý do cụ thể và cảm xúc của bạn

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần explain thường chiếm 40-50% thời gian nói và là nơi bạn thể hiện critical thinking. Bạn cần giải thích:

• Tại sao quyết định của bạn đi ngược với expectations
• Kỳ vọng của người khác là gì và quyết định của bạn khác như thế nào
• Cảm xúc của bạn về phản ứng đó (proud, relieved, misunderstood, vindicated…)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about a decision I made last year that really surprised my family and friends. I decided to quit my stable office job to open a small coffee shop.

I made this decision in March last year, after working in an accounting firm for three years. I had been thinking about it for several months because I wasn’t happy with my job anymore. The work was boring and repetitive, and I felt stressed every day.

The people who were most surprised were my parents and my colleagues. My parents had always wanted me to have a secure job with good benefits, so they were shocked when I told them. My colleagues couldn’t believe it either because I seemed to be doing well at the company.

They were surprised for several reasons. First, everyone thought my job was good because it paid well and was stable. Second, I had studied accounting for four years at university, so they didn’t understand why I would give it up. Third, starting a business is risky, and nobody expected me to take such a big risk.

When I saw their reactions, I felt a bit nervous but also confident about my choice. I understood their concerns, but I knew that I had to follow my passion. Now, one year later, my coffee shop is doing quite well, and my family is starting to support my decision.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có sử dụng linking words (First, Second, Third) nhưng còn mechanical. Story có structure rõ ràng nhưng chưa sophisticated. Một số hesitation nhẹ có thể xảy ra.
Lexical Resource	6-7	Vocabulary adequate (stable job, secure, risky, give up, follow passion) nhưng chưa impressive. Một số collocations đơn giản (make a decision, start a business). Thiếu less common words.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Mix of simple và complex sentences. Sử dụng past perfect (had been thinking) và past simple correctly. Có attempts at complex structures nhưng limited range.
Pronunciation	6-7	Generally clear và understandable với minimal influence từ tiếng Việt. Word stress và intonation mostly appropriate.

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
• ✅ Story structure rõ ràng, dễ follow
• ✅ Có personal details và emotions
• ✅ Time management tốt, đủ thời lượng

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary chưa sophisticated, thiếu idiomatic expressions
• ⚠️ Grammar structures còn basic, predictable
• ⚠️ Phần explain chưa đủ depth về psychological reasons
• ⚠️ Thiếu vivid details khiến story chưa engaging

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to share a decision I made roughly eighteen months ago that took everyone by surprise – I chose to turn down a promotion to senior manager in order to pursue a master’s degree abroad.

The decision came about in early 2023, when I was at what many would consider a pivotal point in my career. I’d been working as a marketing manager at a reputable multinational company for about four years, and management had just offered me a significant step up – a senior position with substantially higher pay and more responsibilities. However, I’d been nurturing a dream of studying international business in the UK, and when I got accepted into a prestigious program at the University of Manchester, I found myself at a crossroads.

The news of my decision sent shockwaves through my workplace and family. My parents, who had witnessed my steady climb up the corporate ladder, were utterly bewildered. They couldn’t fathom why I would walk away from such a golden opportunity. My colleagues were equally taken aback, especially considering that many of them had been vying for similar positions for years.

What made my decision so surprising to them was the timing and the trade-offs. From their perspective, I was at the peak of my career trajectory – young, successful, and being offered everything most people work decades to achieve. Conventional wisdom suggested I should strike while the iron is hot and secure my financial future. Additionally, they saw pursuing further education at this stage as taking two steps backward when I could be forging ahead.

Looking back, their reaction was a mixture of concern and disbelief, which I completely understood. Initially, I felt somewhat torn – their surprise made me second-guess myself for a moment. However, I also felt a deep sense of conviction that this was the right path for me. I realized that their surprise stemmed from their own values and life experiences, while I was betting on long-term fulfillment over immediate gratification. Now, halfway through my program, I feel vindicated in my choice, and interestingly, many of those who were initially skeptical have come around and expressed admiration for my courage.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Smooth delivery với natural discourse markers. Story flows logically với sophisticated cohesive devices. Minimal hesitation, speaks at length without difficulty.
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range of vocabulary với many less common items (pivotal point, nurturing a dream, at a crossroads, send shockwaves, vying for, strike while the iron is hot). Good use of collocations và idiomatic language. Occasional minor imprecision có thể có.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Wide range of structures including complex sentences, relative clauses, past perfect continuous. Majority of sentences error-free. Good control of tenses.
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear pronunciation với effective use of intonation patterns. Word stress và sentence stress natural. Easy to understand throughout.

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“surprised” (repeated), “stable job”, “risky”	“took everyone by surprise”, “sent shockwaves”, “utterly bewildered”, “at a crossroads”
Grammar	Simple past + some past perfect: “I had been thinking…”	Complex mix: past perfect continuous “had been nurturing”, conditionals, relative clauses
Ideas	Basic explanation: good pay, stable, risky business	Deep analysis: timing, trade-offs, conventional wisdom vs personal values, long-term vs short-term
Coherence	Linear sequencing với basic linkers	Sophisticated progression với advanced discourse markers và nuanced transitions

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to recount a decision I made about two years ago that genuinely caught everyone off guard – I chose to step away from what appeared to be a meteoric rise in the corporate world to dedicate myself to social entrepreneurship in my rural hometown.

This decision crystallized in the spring of 2022, though the seeds had been sown much earlier. At the time, I was working as a senior consultant at a Big Four accounting firm in Ho Chi Minh City, and I’d just been headhunted for a director position at a Fortune 500 company with what most would consider a lucrative package – we’re talking about six figures, comprehensive benefits, and the kind of prestige that opens doors. Yet, during a visit back to my hometown in the Mekong Delta, I was struck by the stark disparity between urban prosperity and rural stagnation. I saw untapped potential in the agricultural community there and felt a gnawing sense that I could make a more meaningful contribution by helping local farmers leverage technology to access better markets. This epiphany led me to take the plunge and establish a social enterprise focused on bridging the rural-urban divide.

The announcement of my decision reverberated through my personal and professional circles like an earthquake. My parents, both self-made individuals who had invested enormously in my education, were shell-shocked. They’d envisioned me as the embodiment of their aspirations – a successful executive in the city – and suddenly, I was talking about returning to till the soil, metaphorically speaking. My former colleagues responded with incredulity, with some bluntly questioning my sanity. Even close friends, while supportive, couldn’t help but wonder if I was throwing away years of hard-earned credentials and forfeiting a future that most people could only dream of.

What rendered my decision so startling to them was the sheer magnitude of what I appeared to be sacrificing. From an outsider’s perspective, I was turning my back on not just financial security, but also social capital and professional trajectory that people spend their entire lives cultivating. The prevailing narrative in Vietnamese society still heavily privileges white-collar success and urban achievement – the idea of someone with my background and credentials choosing to work with farmers seemed almost incomprehensible, if not downright regressive. Moreover, my timing seemed particularly ill-conceived to them: I was in my prime earning years, unmarried without financial obligations that would later make such moves impossible. From their vantage point, I should have been consolidating my position and building nest egg, not embarking on what they perceived as a quixotic adventure with no guaranteed returns.

Their reaction was a complex tapestry of concern, bafflement, and perhaps a touch of vicarious anxiety. Initially, I’d be lying if I said it didn’t shake my resolve. There were moments in the dead of night when I questioned whether I was being foolishly idealistic, whether I was squandering opportunities that might never come again. However, wrestling with their doubts ultimately helped me crystallize my own values. I came to realize that their surprise was rooted in a traditional definition of success – one that equates achievement with financial accumulation and status markers. My definition had evolved to prioritize impact and fulfillment over conventional metrics. Rather than feeling defensive, I felt a quiet confidence that I was charting my own course, even if it diverged from the well-trodden path.

Two years on, while my venture is still in its growth phase and I’m earning a fraction of what I could have, the intangible rewards have been immeasurable. Perhaps most satisfyingly, many of those initial skeptics have come full circle – they’ve witnessed the tangible difference we’re making in farmers’ lives and now speak of my decision with respect, some even calling it courageous. It’s taught me that truly transformative decisions will almost always surprise others because, by definition, they challenge the status quo and operate outside conventional frameworks of thinking.

Lựa chọn xã hội doanh nghiệp thay vì sự nghiệp thành thị khiến mọi người ngạc nhiên trong IELTS Speaking

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Effortless fluency với sophisticated discourse management. Ideas develop logically với nuanced progression. Natural pacing, no hesitation, speaks coherently at length. Cohesion sophisticated and unobtrusive.
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Exceptional range với skillful use of less common và idiomatic items (meteoric rise, seeds had been sown, gnawing sense, take the plunge, till the soil, quixotic adventure, in the dead of night, come full circle). Precise meaning và appropriate register. Natural collocations throughout.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range of structures với full flexibility và accuracy. Complex sentences handled with ease. Consistent accuracy with only rare, minor “slips”. Perfect control of tenses including past perfect và conditionals.
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Native-like delivery với sophisticated control of phonological features. Sustained use of appropriate intonation patterns, word stress, và connected speech. Easy to understand throughout, enhances meaning.

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Không có hesitation hay self-correction. Ideas flow naturally như đang kể chuyện cho bạn bè, nhưng vẫn maintain formality phù hợp với context thi. Sử dụng discourse markers tinh tế không mechanical.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• “meteoric rise” – không chỉ nói “quick success” mà dùng metaphor mạnh mẽ
• “seeds had been sown” – idiomatic expression thể hiện quá trình dần dần
• “gnawing sense” – vivid adjective thể hiện cảm xúc sâu sắc
• “quixotic adventure” – literary reference showing cultural knowledge
• “in the dead of night” – idiomatic, emotional
• “come full circle” – sophisticated idiom về sự thay đổi quan điểm

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• “we’re talking about six figures” – conversational yet appropriate structure
• “I’d be lying if I said it didn’t shake my resolve” – complex conditional với double negative
• “whether I was being foolishly idealistic, whether I was squandering” – parallel structure với repeated whether clauses
• “they’ve witnessed… and now speak…” – perfect tense showing change over time

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:

• Không chỉ kể story mà còn analyze cultural và societal expectations
• Reflect on personal values vs conventional success metrics
• Show psychological depth: moments of doubt, process of resolving internal conflict
• Demonstrate growth: from uncertainty to conviction to vindication
• Cultural sensitivity: understanding of Vietnamese social norms về success

---

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner thường hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2 trước khi chuyển sang Part 3:

Question 1: Do you think you made the right decision?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I think I made the right decision. Although it was difficult at first, I’m much happier now and I don’t regret my choice.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely. With the benefit of hindsight, I can say with certainty that it was the right call for me. While the path hasn’t been without its challenges, the personal growth and sense of purpose I’ve gained have been worth their weight in gold. Looking back, I only wish I’d had the courage to make that leap sooner.

---

Question 2: Would you encourage others to make similar bold decisions?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I would encourage them if they’re not happy with their current situation. But they should think carefully and have a good plan before making big changes.

Band 8-9 Answer:
I would, but with important caveats. I think everyone should have the courage to pursue their authentic path, but it’s crucial to be strategic rather than impulsive. My advice would be to do your due diligence, build a safety net, and most importantly, align your decision with your core values rather than simply chasing novelty. Life-changing decisions require both courage and calculated planning.

---

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần thách thức nhất, kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi trừu tượng và sâu sắc hơn Part 2. Đây là lúc examiner đánh giá khả năng critical thinking và sử dụng academic language của bạn. Không giống Part 1 (personal) và Part 2 (storytelling), Part 3 yêu cầu bạn discuss về social issues, trends, và abstract concepts.

Yêu cầu:

• Phân tích từ nhiều góc độ (economic, social, cultural, generational…)
• So sánh (past vs present, young vs old, your country vs others)
• Đưa ra opinions có lý lẽ rõ ràng và supporting evidence
• Acknowledge complexity của issues – tránh absolute statements

Chiến lược:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời đến 3-5 câu (40-60 giây)
• Structure: Direct answer → Reason 1 + example → Reason 2 + example → Conclusion/Nuance
• Sử dụng discourse markers để organize thoughts (Well, Actually, On the one hand…)
• Đưa ra examples từ society, không chỉ personal experience
• Show balanced thinking: “However”, “On the flip side”, “Having said that”

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn (1-2 câu) thiếu elaboration
• Không có clear standpoint hoặc contradiction trong logic
• Thiếu từ vựng abstract và academic
• Chỉ nói về personal experience thay vì societal perspective
• Không acknowledge other viewpoints
• Over-generalize với “everyone”, “always”, “never”

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Decision-Making in Modern Society

---

Question 1: Why do you think young people today often make decisions that surprise older generations?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause-Effect (Why) – yêu cầu analyze reasons
• Key words: young people, surprise, older generations → focus on generational gap
• Cách tiếp cận: State the phenomenon briefly → Give 2-3 reasons (values, technology, social change) → Examples → Conclude với balanced view

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think young people make different decisions because the world has changed a lot. They have different values from their parents’ generation. For example, many young people care more about happiness and work-life balance than just making money. Also, they have more information from the internet, so they can learn about different lifestyle choices. Older people are surprised because they think the traditional way is safer and better.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic cause-effect structure có present
• Vocabulary: Common words (changed a lot, care more about, traditional way) nhưng adequate
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Ideas relevant và có example, nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated language. Không có nuanced analysis của psychological hay sociological factors.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, I think there’s a fundamental disconnect between generations that stems from dramatically different formative experiences. Today’s young people, particularly millennials and Gen Z, have come of age in an era of unprecedented connectivity and rapid social change, which has fundamentally reshaped their value systems. Unlike their parents who prioritized job security and material accumulation due to experiencing economic hardship, younger generations place greater emphasis on personal fulfillment, purpose, and experiences.

On top of that, the proliferation of social media and global communication has exposed them to diverse lifestyle models that previous generations simply weren’t aware of. When they see digital nomads working from Bali or social entrepreneurs building purpose-driven businesses, these alternatives become viable options rather than pipe dreams. This broadened horizon of possibilities naturally leads to decisions that deviate from conventional scripts.

What often surprises older generations is that these decisions challenge the very metrics by which they measured success. When a young person turns down a stable corporate job to become a content creator, for instance, it’s not just the choice itself that’s surprising – it’s the underlying rejection of traditional career hierarchies and linear progression models. At its core, this generational gap reflects a profound shift in how we define prosperity and achievement in the modern age.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized với clear progression: State phenomenon → Analyze causes (values + exposure) → Explain psychological impact → Conclude với deeper insight
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated range (fundamental disconnect, formative experiences, come of age, unprecedented connectivity, proliferation of, pipe dreams, deviate from conventional scripts, underlying rejection, linear progression)
• Grammar: Complex structures: relative clauses, passives, present perfect với social changes
• Critical Thinking: Goes beyond surface reasons để analyze psychological và sociological dimensions, shows understanding of generational theory

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Well”, “On top of that”, “At its core” – natural organization
• Tentative language: “I think there’s”, “often surprises” – avoiding absolutes
• Abstract nouns: “disconnect”, “fulfillment”, “prosperity”, “achievement” – academic register
• Collocations: “come of age”, “place emphasis on”, “turn down”, “at its core”

Tương tự như cách mà describe a time when you achieved something significant, việc thảo luận về quyết định đột phá cũng yêu cầu người học phản ánh sâu sắc về động lực cá nhân và giá trị xã hội.

---

Question 2: Do you think people make better decisions now than in the past? Why or why not?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Compare (past vs present) + Justification
• Key words: better decisions, now vs past
• Cách tiếp cận: State position (better/not necessarily better/mixed) → Give reasons với temporal comparison → Acknowledge complexity

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think it’s difficult to say if decisions are better now or in the past. On one hand, we have more information and tools to help us make decisions, like the internet and expert advice. We can research everything before deciding. On the other hand, having too many choices can make decisions harder. In the past, people had fewer options, so decisions were simpler. I think both times have advantages and disadvantages.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Balanced view với “on one hand/on the other hand”
• Vocabulary: Basic but clear (more information, too many choices, advantages and disadvantages)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Shows some analytical thinking nhưng lacks depth và specific examples. Language functional but not sophisticated.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’d argue that it’s a mixed bag, actually. In some respects, the modern information age has equipped us with unprecedented tools for informed decision-making. We have access to vast databases, expert opinions, data analytics, and comparative reviews that our predecessors could never have imagined. This informational advantage theoretically enables more evidence-based choices rather than decisions based solely on gut feeling or limited anecdotal experience.

However, there’s a significant caveat – having more information doesn’t automatically translate to better decisions. Paradoxically, the abundance of choice and information overload can lead to what psychologists call “decision fatigue” and “analysis paralysis.” When faced with hundreds of smartphone models or career paths, people can become overwhelmed and either defer decisions indefinitely or make impulsive choices just to escape the anxiety. Research has shown that excessive choice can actually diminish satisfaction with our decisions.

Moreover, I think we need to consider what constitutes a “better” decision. If we’re measuring by material outcomes and efficiency, then yes, modern decision-making tools are superior. But if we’re considering psychological wellbeing and authenticity, one could argue that our ancestors, who made decisions based on community values and time-tested wisdom, might have experienced less regret and existential uncertainty. They weren’t constantly second-guessing themselves by comparing their choices to curated alternatives on social media.

At the end of the day, I believe the key isn’t whether we have access to more information, but whether we’ve developed the critical thinking skills and emotional intelligence to filter that information and align decisions with our authentic values. That’s the challenge of our time.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated three-part argument: Advantages → Disadvantages (paradox) → Deeper philosophical consideration → Conclusion
• Vocabulary: Academic and precise (mixed bag, equipped with, informational advantage, evidence-based, gut feeling, caveat, paradoxically, analysis paralysis, defer indefinitely, curated alternatives, existential uncertainty, second-guessing)
• Grammar: Full range including conditionals (“if we’re measuring”), relative clauses, passive constructions, perfect tenses
• Critical Thinking: References psychological research, considers multiple definitions of “better”, acknowledges paradoxes, provides nuanced conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Actually”, “However”, “Moreover”, “At the end of the day”
• Academic references: “what psychologists call”, “Research has shown”
• Contrastive structures: “In some respects… However…”, “If we’re measuring by X… But if we’re considering Y…”
• Hedging: “I’d argue”, “theoretically”, “one could argue”

---

Question 3: What role does social pressure play in people’s decision-making?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause-Effect / Analysis (What role)
• Key words: social pressure, decision-making
• Cách tiếp cận: Define/acknowledge the influence → Explain mechanisms → Give examples → Consider positive/negative aspects

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Social pressure has a big influence on people’s decisions. Many people want to fit in with their family, friends, or society, so they choose what others expect them to do. For example, some people choose a career their parents want instead of following their own dreams. Sometimes social pressure is good because it helps people avoid bad decisions. But sometimes it stops people from being themselves and doing what makes them happy.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear explanation với positive/negative aspects
• Vocabulary: Basic (big influence, fit in, choose what others expect)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses question adequately với relevant example, nhưng lacks sophistication và deeper psychological analysis.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Social pressure plays a profoundly influential role, often operating at both conscious and unconscious levels. At its core, humans are inherently social beings with deep-seated needs for acceptance and belonging, which makes us acutely sensitive to the expectations and judgments of our reference groups – whether that’s family, peers, or broader society.

This influence manifests in several ways. Most obviously, there’s explicit pressure where family members or communities directly advocate for certain decisions – like pushing children toward prestigious careers such as medicine or law. But perhaps more insidiously, there’s implicit pressure from social norms and what we might call “the herd mentality.” When everyone around you is buying property, getting married at a certain age, or pursuing particular lifestyle choices, there’s an unspoken expectation that you’ll conform to that template, even without anyone explicitly telling you to.

The impact can be both constraining and constructive. On the negative side, social pressure can stifle individuality and lead people to make decisions that run counter to their authentic desires, resulting in long-term dissatisfaction and even identity crises. We see this frequently in Asian cultures, where filial piety and face-saving concerns might lead someone to sacrifice personal aspirations for family expectations.

On the flip side, social pressure isn’t always detrimental. It can serve as a valuable reality check and protective mechanism. When our community questions a reckless decision, they might be offering wisdom born from collective experience. Moreover, accountability to others can actually help us follow through on positive commitments – think of how public declarations of goals increase success rates.

What’s crucial is developing the discernment to distinguish between pressure that stems from others’ genuine concern for our wellbeing and pressure that merely reflects their projections of what success should look like. Striking that balance between honoring social bonds and maintaining personal autonomy is one of life’s central challenges.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Comprehensive analysis: Define + explain mechanisms → Examples of types → Discuss positive và negative → Conclude với balanced insight
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated (profoundly influential, inherently social beings, deep-seated needs, acutely sensitive, reference groups, manifests, explicitly/implicitly, herd mentality, unspoken expectation, stifle individuality, run counter to, filial piety, face-saving concerns, reckless decision, accountability, discernment, projections, striking that balance)
• Grammar: Complex structures throughout với perfect control
• Critical Thinking: Nuanced analysis acknowledging both positive và negative aspects, cultural sensitivity, psychological depth về conscious/unconscious influences

💡 Key Language Features:

• Academic style: “manifests in several ways”, “at conscious and unconscious levels”
• Balanced language: “On the negative side… On the flip side”
• Tentative expressions: “perhaps more insidiously”, “might be offering”
• Sophisticated connectors: “Moreover”, “What’s crucial is”

Áp lực xã hội ảnh hưởng đến quyết định cá nhân trong IELTS Speaking Part 3

---

Theme 2: Risk-Taking and Change

---

Question 4: Why do some people find it harder to take risks than others?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause-Effect / Individual differences
• Key words: find it harder, take risks, some people vs others
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple factors (personality, upbringing, experience, culture) → Explain each → Give examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Different people have different personalities and backgrounds. Some people are naturally more careful and afraid of losing what they have. Maybe they grew up in families that taught them to be safe and avoid risks. Other people are more adventurous because they had different experiences. Also, people who have failed before might be more afraid to try new things. Culture also matters – some cultures encourage risk-taking more than others.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists multiple factors adequately
• Vocabulary: Simple (naturally more careful, afraid of losing, adventurous)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers relevant factors nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated explanation of psychological mechanisms.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I think risk tolerance is shaped by a complex interplay of factors – nature and nurture both playing significant roles. From a personality standpoint, there’s actually empirical evidence suggesting that risk-taking propensity has genetic components. Some individuals are simply hardwired to be more sensation-seeking and novelty-oriented, while others have a neurological predisposition toward caution and loss aversion.

Beyond innate tendencies, upbringing plays a pivotal role. Children raised in environments where calculated risks were modeled and failures were framed as learning opportunities tend to develop greater resilience and comfort with uncertainty. Conversely, those from risk-averse households where mistakes were punished or where there was economic instability might develop a scarcity mindset that makes any gamble feel potentially catastrophic.

There’s also what psychologists call “reference dependence” – our willingness to take risks depends on our current situation. Someone who has accumulated substantial resources and has a safety net feels more empowered to take risks than someone living paycheck to paycheck for whom a failed venture could mean financial ruin. It’s not necessarily about courage but about opportunity cost and what’s at stake.

Additionally, I’d highlight cultural conditioning. In individualistic societies like the US, there’s a cultural narrative celebrating entrepreneurial risk-takers and viewing failure as a badge of honor. However, in more collectivist Asian cultures where family reputation and social harmony are paramount, taking risks that could bring shame or instability is heavily discouraged. This cultural overlay can either amplify or suppress natural risk-taking inclinations.

Ultimately, those who find risk-taking harder aren’t necessarily lacking courage – they’re often operating within rational constraints shaped by their biology, history, resources, and cultural context. Understanding these factors can help us approach risk-taking more strategically rather than simply trying to force ourselves to be braver.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Multi-dimensional analysis: Genetic → Environmental/upbringing → Economic/situational → Cultural → Nuanced conclusion
• Vocabulary: Academic and precise (complex interplay, nature and nurture, empirical evidence, risk-taking propensity, hardwired, neurological predisposition, loss aversion, calculated risks, scarcity mindset, reference dependence, opportunity cost, cultural conditioning, cultural narrative, cultural overlay, rational constraints)
• Grammar: Full range với sophisticated structures
• Critical Thinking: References psychological concepts, considers biological/psychological/social/economic/cultural dimensions, avoids oversimplification, empathetic conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

• Academic references: “empirical evidence”, “psychologists call”, “what’s at stake”
• Technical vocabulary: “loss aversion”, “reference dependence”, “scarcity mindset”
• Contrastive structures: “Some individuals… while others”, “Conversely”
• Nuanced conclusion: “aren’t necessarily lacking courage – they’re often operating within rational constraints”

Việc thảo luận về khả năng chấp nhận rủi ro cũng liên quan mật thiết đến describe a situation where you had to take responsibility for something, vì cả hai đều yêu cầu can đảm và tư duy phản biện.

---

Question 5: Do you think society is becoming more accepting of unconventional life choices?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Social trend analysis
• Key words: society, becoming more accepting, unconventional life choices
• Cách tiếp cận: State position → Provide evidence of change → Acknowledge limitations/counterexamples → Consider future direction

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think society is becoming more open-minded about different lifestyles. These days, we see more people accepting things that were unusual before, like choosing not to get married or changing careers multiple times. Social media helps people share their different lifestyles and show that there are many ways to be successful. However, in some traditional communities, people still prefer conventional choices. But overall, I think the trend is toward more acceptance, especially among younger generations.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position with supporting points và some acknowledgment of exceptions
• Vocabulary: Basic (open-minded, unusual, traditional communities, conventional choices)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses the question with relevant ideas nhưng lacks sophisticated analysis of underlying social forces và mechanisms of change.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I would say yes, but with important qualifications. There’s undeniably a discernible shift toward greater acceptance of life paths that deviate from traditional templates, particularly in urban and educated demographics. We’re seeing growing normalization of choices like remaining childfree, pursuing non-linear careers, cohabiting without marriage, or rejecting the conventional corporate ladder in favor of freelancing or passion projects.

Several factors are driving this evolution. Firstly, the democratization of media through social platforms has amplified diverse voices and created visible communities around alternative lifestyles, making them seem less fringe and more mainstream. When you can find thousands of others living similarly unconventional lives, it validates your choices and dilutes the stigma. Secondly, economic realities have forced many people to forge their own paths anyway – when traditional markers of success like homeownership or lifetime employment are increasingly out of reach, unconventionality becomes a pragmatic adaptation rather than mere rebellion.

That said, this acceptance is far from universal or complete. There remains considerable resistance, particularly around choices that challenge deeply entrenched social structures like marriage and parenthood. In many Asian societies, including Vietnam, while there’s surface-level tolerance of unconventional careers, there’s still profound pressure around family formation and intergenerational expectations. The acceptance tends to be conditional – you can be unconventional in your twenties, but expectations often crystallize as you approach certain ages.

Moreover, I think we need to distinguish between tolerance and genuine celebration of difference. While overt discrimination may have decreased, many unconventional choices are still subtly stigmatized through concerned questions, unsolicited advice, or being made to constantly justify your decisions. True acceptance would mean these choices require no more explanation than conventional ones.

Looking ahead, I’m cautiously optimistic that this trend will continue, driven by generational turnover and continued economic disruption making traditional paths less feasible or appealing. However, the pace of change will likely vary dramatically across different communities and will probably ebb and flow rather than progressing linearly. Cultural evolution is messy and uneven, after all.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated organization: Clear position with qualification → Evidence and drivers of change → Counterarguments and limitations → Nuanced distinction (tolerance vs celebration) → Future outlook
• Vocabulary: Advanced (important qualifications, discernible shift, deviate from templates, normalization, democratization of media, fringe vs mainstream, validates your choices, dilutes the stigma, entrenched social structures, surface-level tolerance, conditional, crystallize, subtly stigmatized, unsolicited advice, ebb and flow)
• Grammar: Complex structures với full control, including conditionals, relative clauses, passive voice
• Critical Thinking: Multi-layered analysis considering social, economic, demographic, và cultural factors; distinguishes between types of acceptance; acknowledges complexity và variability; provides sophisticated future prediction

💡 Key Language Features:

• Qualification language: “I would say yes, but with important qualifications”, “far from universal”
• Academic discourse: “Several factors are driving”, “That said”, “Moreover”, “Looking ahead”
• Sophisticated connectors: “Firstly… Secondly…”, “while… however…”
• Precise vocabulary: “discernible shift”, “democratization”, “amplified”, “validates”

---

Theme 3: Cultural and Generational Perspectives

---

Question 6: How do cultural values influence the decisions people make?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Analysis of mechanism (How)
• Key words: cultural values, influence, decisions
• Cách tiếp cận: Define cultural values briefly → Explain mechanisms of influence → Give cross-cultural examples → Consider degree of influence

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Cultural values have a strong effect on people’s decisions. In some cultures, family is very important, so people often choose what their family wants instead of only thinking about themselves. For example, in Asian cultures, children might study medicine because their parents want them to, not because it’s their personal interest. Different cultures also have different ideas about success – some value money and status, while others value happiness and balance. These cultural values shape what people think is a good decision.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic explanation with Asian example
• Vocabulary: Simple (strong effect, very important, good decision)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses question appropriately với relevant example, nhưng lacks depth về psychological và social mechanisms, và sophisticated cultural analysis.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Cultural values function as invisible lenses through which we perceive and evaluate options, often operating so fundamentally that we don’t even recognize their influence. They essentially define the parameters of what constitutes acceptable, desirable, or shameful choices, thereby channeling our decision-making in particular directions.

One primary mechanism is through collective vs individualistic orientations. In individualistic cultures like the US or Australia, there’s a premium placed on personal autonomy, self-expression, and charting one’s own course. Decisions are often framed around “What do I want?” or “What aligns with my authentic self?” However, in collectivist cultures prevalent across Asia, decisions are inherently relational – they’re evaluated not just by personal satisfaction but by their impact on family harmony, social face, and intergenerational obligations. So when someone from a collectivist background weighs a career decision, they’re simultaneously calculating filial responsibility, potential for bringing honor to the family, and whether the choice upholds or threatens social cohesion.

Another dimension is attitudes toward uncertainty and tradition. Cultures with what researchers call “high uncertainty avoidance” tend to prize stability and established paths, making unconventional decisions psychologically more costly. This is why in countries with strong uncertainty avoidance, you see more people gravitating toward secure government jobs or well-trodden career paths rather than entrepreneurial ventures. The cultural conditioning makes risk feel disproportionately threatening.

There’s also the temporal dimension – some cultures are past-oriented, valuing tradition and ancestral wisdom, while others are future-oriented, prioritizing innovation and progress. These temporal orientations influence whether people make decisions by consulting tradition or by experimenting with novel approaches.

That said, I think it’s crucial not to overstate cultural determinism. Within any culture, there’s tremendous individual variation, and globalization is creating increasingly hybrid value systems, especially among younger generations who are exposed to diverse cultural narratives. Culture provides a powerful current, but individuals can and do swim against it – though often at personal cost in terms of social friction and emotional labor.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated multi-level analysis: Metaphorical introduction → Mechanism 1 (collectivism/individualism) with detailed explanation → Mechanism 2 (uncertainty avoidance) → Mechanism 3 (temporal orientation) → Important qualification about individual agency
• Vocabulary: Academic and precise (invisible lenses, define parameters, channeling, premium placed on, charting one’s own course, inherently relational, social face, intergenerational obligations, upholds or threatens, uncertainty avoidance, prize stability, gravitating toward, well-trodden paths, temporal dimension, consulting tradition, cultural determinism, tremendous individual variation, hybrid value systems, swim against it)
• Grammar: Full range of complex structures với perfect accuracy
• Critical Thinking: References cultural psychology theories, provides cross-cultural comparative analysis, uses sophisticated metaphors, acknowledges complexity and individual agency, demonstrates deep understanding of cultural dynamics

💡 Key Language Features:

• Sophisticated metaphors: “invisible lenses”, “provides a powerful current”, “swim against it”
• Academic references: “what researchers call”, “temporal dimension”, “cultural determinism”
• Contrastive frameworks: “In individualistic cultures… However, in collectivist cultures”
• Qualification: “That said, I think it’s crucial not to overstate”
• Technical terminology: “uncertainty avoidance”, “intergenerational obligations”, “social face”

Khi thảo luận về ảnh hưởng của giá trị văn hóa, người học cũng có thể tham khảo cách phản ánh về describe a family tradition you enjoy để hiểu rõ hơn về mối liên hệ giữa truyền thống và các quyết định cá nhân.

---

Question 7: Is it important for famous people to make bold decisions? Why?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion về specific group (famous people)
• Key words: important, famous people, bold decisions
• Cách tiếp cận: Define what “bold decisions” means in this context → Argue for importance (or not) → Consider responsibilities và influence → Give examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think it’s important for famous people to make bold decisions because they have influence on many people. When celebrities take risks or stand up for important causes, they can inspire others to do the same. For example, when a famous actress speaks about mental health, it helps reduce stigma. However, they also need to be responsible because their decisions affect their fans. If they make bad choices, young people might copy them. So bold decisions are good if they are positive and helpful to society.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position với supporting reasons và qualification
• Vocabulary: Adequate (have influence, take risks, stand up for causes, inspire, reduce stigma)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Relevant response với example, nhưng lacks sophistication và deeper analysis of celebrity influence mechanisms.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

This is quite nuanced, actually. On one hand, I’d argue that celebrities and public figures bear a unique responsibility precisely because of their outsized platform and cultural influence. When someone in the public eye makes a bold decision – whether that’s speaking out on controversial issues, disrupting industry norms, or championing unpopular causes – they can catalyze broader social conversations and normalize behaviors that might otherwise remain marginalized. Think of how coming out stories from celebrities have accelerated LGBTQ+ acceptance, or how athletes taking a knee sparked global discussions about racial justice. Their visibility amplifies impact exponentially.

Moreover, famous people are often in positions where playing it safe is not only creatively stifling but also represents a missed opportunity for meaningful change. Many achieved fame precisely by bucking conventions in the first place, so continuing to make bold choices feels consistent with their public role as innovators or cultural provocateurs. In the entertainment industry, for instance, calculated risks often distinguish legends from mere celebrities.

However, I think we need to be careful about romanticizing boldness for its own sake. Not all bold decisions are wise or ethical, and the cult of celebrity can sometimes conflate audacity with value. When influencers make reckless decisions, the consequences ripple outward, particularly affecting impressionable young followers who might emulate behaviors without understanding nuanced contexts. There’s a difference between courageous stands on principle and attention-seeking provocations devoid of substance.

Furthermore, the pressure for constant boldness can be psychologically taxing and may not reflect these individuals’ authentic selves – they’re human beings, not perpetual revolutionaries. Sometimes the most important decision a famous person can make is simply to live authentically and set healthy boundaries, even if that seems less dramatic.

So to sum up, I believe famous people should feel empowered to make bold decisions when aligned with their values and leveraging their platform for positive change, but we shouldn’t impose an obligation that every choice must be groundbreaking. The importance lies not in boldness itself, but in thoughtful authenticity and responsible use of influence.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated: Establish nuance → Argument for importance with mechanisms and examples → Counterargument (dangers of romanticizing) → Additional consideration (psychological impact) → Balanced conclusion
• Vocabulary: Advanced (bear unique responsibility, outsized platform, cultural influence, catalyze, normalize, marginalized, accelerated acceptance, visibility amplifies, bucking conventions, cultural provocateurs, calculated risks, romanticizing boldness, cult of celebrity, conflate audacity with value, ripple outward, impressionable followers, emulate, courageous stands, attention-seeking provocations, psychologically taxing, perpetual revolutionaries, impose an obligation, thoughtful authenticity)
• Grammar: Full range với sophisticated structures including conditionals, relative clauses, gerunds, sophisticated passive constructions
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis considering social impact, professional considerations, ethical dimensions, psychological factors; distinguishes between types of boldness; provides nuanced conclusion balancing empowerment with realism

💡 Key Language Features:

• Nuanced introduction: “This is quite nuanced, actually”
• Sophisticated discourse markers: “On one hand… Moreover… However… Furthermore… So to sum up”
• Precise distinctions: “difference between courageous stands and attention-seeking provocations”
• Conditional language: “when aligned with their values”, “if that seems less dramatic”
• Advanced collocations: “bear responsibility”, “catalyze conversations”, “ripple outward”

Khi nói về người nổi tiếng và quyết định của họ, học viên có thể liên hệ với describe a person who often appears in the news whom you would like to meet để phát triển khả năng phân tích ảnh hưởng của các nhân vật công chúng.

---

Question 8: How has technology changed the way people make decisions?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Change analysis (How has X changed Y)
• Key words: technology, changed, way people make decisions
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple dimensions of change → Explain mechanisms → Consider positive và negative impacts → Examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Technology has changed decision-making a lot. Now we can get information very quickly from the internet before making decisions. We can compare prices, read reviews, and ask for advice online. This makes decisions easier in some ways. But sometimes too much information makes it harder to choose because there are too many options. Also, people might rely too much on technology and not trust their own judgment anymore. Overall, technology has both helped and complicated decision-making.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic comparison of positive và negative impacts
• Vocabulary: Simple (changed a lot, get information quickly, easier/harder, too much information)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses question with relevant points nhưng lacks depth về specific mechanisms và sophisticated analysis of technological impacts.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Technology has fundamentally transformed the decision-making landscape in several profound ways. Most obviously, it’s created unprecedented access to information. Whereas previous generations might have made major purchases or life decisions based on limited data points and word-of-mouth, we now have instant access to comprehensive research, comparative analytics, expert opinions, and crowdsourced reviews. This has theoretically democratized expertise and enabled more data-driven decisions across all life domains.

Beyond information access, technology has introduced algorithmic decision support. From AI-powered recommendation systems suggesting which movies to watch or products to buy, to sophisticated financial planning tools and even career matching algorithms, we’re increasingly outsourcing cognitive load to technological intermediaries. This can enhance efficiency and help us navigate complexity, but it also raises questions about whether we’re ceding autonomy to black-box systems whose logic we don’t fully understand.

Another significant shift is the acceleration of decision cycles. Technology has compressed timeframes – we can make instant purchases, book flights in seconds, or swipe through potential romantic partners at unprecedented speed. This has created a culture of immediacy where delayed gratification feels increasingly foreign, and we’ve become accustomed to instant optionality. The psychological ramifications are still unfolding, but we’re seeing evidence of diminished patience and commitment challenges when decisions can be reversed or revisited so easily.

Paradoxically, despite all these decision-support tools, many people report feeling more overwhelmed rather than empowered. The phenomenon of “choice overload” has been well-documented – when you can choose from 50 health insurance plans or hundreds of career paths laid out on LinkedIn, decision fatigue sets in. Technology has exponentially multiplied our options without necessarily improving our evaluative frameworks for selecting among them.

There’s also the social comparison dimension. Social media has made others’ life choices hyper-visible, creating constant reference points that color our decision-making. We’re not just asking “Is this right for me?” but implicitly comparing “Is this as impressive as what my peers are doing?” This externalized locus of evaluation can distort priorities and lead to decisions driven more by optics than genuine preference.

In essence, technology has made decision-making simultaneously more informed and more paralyzing, faster yet less thoughtful, connected to collective wisdom yet more susceptible to algorithmic manipulation. The challenge for modern individuals is harnessing the benefits while developing critical digital literacy and preserving human judgment at the core of important choices.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Comprehensive multi-dimensional analysis: Information access → Algorithmic support → Temporal acceleration → Paradoxical effects (choice overload) → Social comparison → Nuanced synthesis
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated academic vocabulary (fundamentally transformed, unprecedented access, democratized expertise, data-driven decisions, outsourcing cognitive load, ceding autonomy, black-box systems, compressed timeframes, culture of immediacy, delayed gratification, psychological ramifications, diminished patience, choice overload, decision fatigue, evaluative frameworks, hyper-visible, externalized locus of evaluation, distort priorities, algorithmic manipulation, harnessing benefits, critical digital literacy)
• Grammar: Full range of advanced structures with consistent accuracy
• Critical Thinking: Multi-layered analysis considering cognitive, temporal, social, and psychological dimensions; identifies paradoxes and unintended consequences; references research concepts; provides nuanced synthesis rather than simplistic conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

• Advanced discourse organization: Clear progression through multiple dimensions with sophisticated connectors
• Academic references: “phenomenon of choice overload has been well-documented”, “evidence of diminished patience”
• Paradoxes explicitly stated: “Paradoxically, despite… more overwhelmed”, “simultaneously more informed and more paralyzing”
• Technical vocabulary: “algorithmic decision support”, “crowdsourced reviews”, “black-box systems”, “locus of evaluation”
• Sophisticated synthesis: “In essence” followed by parallel structures showing complexity

Công nghệ ảnh hưởng quyết định trong thời hiện đại IELTS Speaking

---

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
take someone by surprise	phrase	/teɪk ˈsʌmwʌn baɪ səˈpraɪz/	làm ai đó ngạc nhiên	My decision to quit my job took everyone by surprise.	take sb by surprise, catch sb off guard, come as a shock
pivotal point	noun phrase	/ˈpɪvətl pɔɪnt/	điểm then chốt, thời điểm quan trọng	I was at a pivotal point in my career when I made that decision.	pivotal moment, critical juncture, turning point, crossroads
conventional wisdom	noun phrase	/kənˈvenʃənl ˈwɪzdəm/	quan niệm truyền thống, suy nghĩ thông thường	Conventional wisdom suggested I should accept the promotion.	challenge conventional wisdom, defy expectations, go against the grain
walk away from	phrasal verb	/wɔːk əˈweɪ frɒm/	từ bỏ, rời bỏ	I decided to walk away from a lucrative career.	walk away from opportunity, turn down an offer, pass up a chance
strike while the iron is hot	idiom	/straɪk waɪl ði ˈaɪən ɪz hɒt/	chớp thời cơ, tận dụng cơ hội khi còn có thể	People told me to strike while the iron is hot and accept the position.	seize the opportunity, capitalize on, take advantage of timing
second-guess	verb	/ˈsekənd ɡes/	nghi ngờ lại quyết định của bản thân	I started to second-guess myself after seeing their reactions.	second-guess one’s decision, have doubts, question one’s judgment
vindicated	adjective	/ˈvɪndɪkeɪtɪd/	được chứng minh là đúng, được minh oan	I felt vindicated when my business became successful.	feel vindicated, prove someone right, justify one’s decision
meteoric rise	noun phrase	/ˌmiːtiˈɒrɪk raɪz/	sự thăng tiến nhanh chóng	He experienced a meteoric rise in his career.	rapid ascent, swift progression, quick advancement
at a crossroads	idiom	/æt ə ˈkrɒsrəʊdz/	ở ngã rẽ quan trọng trong cuộc đời	I found myself at a crossroads between security and passion.	reach a crossroads, face a dilemma, confront a choice
take the plunge	idiom	/teɪk ðə plʌndʒ/	quyết định làm điều gì đó mạo hiểm	I finally took the plunge and started my own business.	make the leap, take the risk, commit to action
nurture a dream	verb phrase	/ˈnɜːtʃə ə driːm/	ấp ủ một ước mơ	I’d been nurturing a dream of studying abroad for years.	harbor an ambition, cherish a goal, hold onto a vision
utterly bewildered	adjective phrase	/ˈʌtəli bɪˈwɪldəd/	vô cùng bối rối, hoang mang	My parents were utterly bewildered by my choice.	completely confused, totally perplexed, thoroughly baffled
vying for	verb	/ˈvaɪɪŋ fɔː/	cạnh tranh để có được	Many colleagues had been vying for that position for years.	compete for, contend for, strive for
long-term fulfillment	noun phrase	/lɒŋ tɜːm fʊlˈfɪlmənt/	sự thỏa mãn lâu dài	I prioritized long-term fulfillment over immediate financial gain.	lasting satisfaction, enduring happiness, sustained contentment
trade-off	noun	/ˈtreɪd ɒf/	sự đánh đổi, hy sinh cái này để có cái kia	There was a significant trade-off between salary and work-life balance.	make a trade-off, balance competing interests, compromise
leap of faith	idiom	/liːp əv feɪθ/	hành động mạo hiểm dựa trên niềm tin	Starting a business required a leap of faith.	take a chance, trust one’s instincts, venture into unknown
buck the trend	idiom	/bʌk ðə trend/	đi ngược xu hướng	I decided to buck the trend and pursue an unconventional path.	go against convention, defy norms, swim against the current
calculated risk	noun phrase	/ˈkælkjʊleɪtɪd rɪsk/	rủi ro được tính toán, cân nhắc	It was a calculated risk based on market research.	informed gamble, strategic chance, measured venture
forge one’s own path	idiom	/fɔːdʒ wʌnz əʊn pɑːθ/	tự tạo con đường riêng cho mình	She decided to forge her own path instead of following family expectations.	carve out a niche, chart one’s course, blaze a trail

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
send shockwaves	gây chấn động, làm mọi người sửng sốt	My resignation sent shockwaves through the office.	7.5-9
come full circle	trở lại điểm xuất phát, chu kỳ hoàn thành	Their opinions have come full circle from skepticism to admiration.	7.5-9
in the dead of night	lúc nửa đêm (khi suy nghĩ nhiều nhất)	In the dead of night, I questioned my decision.	8-9
throw caution to the wind	bỏ mọi sự thận trọng, liều lĩnh hành động	I decided to throw caution to the wind and pursue my passion.	7.5-9
a watershed moment	thời điểm bước ngoặt quan trọng	That decision was a watershed moment in my life.	7.5-9
burn one’s bridges	đốt cầu phía sau, không thể quay lại	By resigning without notice, I was burning my bridges.	7.5-9
bite the bullet	chấp nhận làm điều khó khăn	I had to bite the bullet and have a difficult conversation with my parents.	7-9
go out on a limb	làm điều mạo hiểm, liều lĩnh	I went out on a limb by turning down a secure job offer.	7.5-9
the ball is in someone’s court	trách nhiệm/quyết định thuộc về ai đó	After presenting my plan, the ball was in my parents’ court to support or oppose.	7-9
on the fence	do dự, chưa quyết định được	I was on the fence for months before making my final decision.	7-8
a quantum leap	bước nhảy vọt lớn	Moving abroad represented a quantum leap in my personal development.	8-9
the writing on the wall	dấu hiệu rõ ràng của điều sắp xảy ra	I saw the writing on the wall that my current career wasn’t sustainable.	7.5-9

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Dùng khi cần một chút thời gian suy nghĩ hoặc khi câu trả lời phức tạp
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác biệt hoặc surprising information
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi muốn thể hiện sự thật thật
• 📝 I’d say that… – Cách mềm mại để đưa ra quan điểm
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Nhấn mạnh đây là góc nhìn cá nhân

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó (formal hơn “also”)
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa (trang trọng)
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến (thường cho điểm quan trọng)
• 📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó (academic style)
• 📝 Furthermore,… – Hơn nữa (formal)
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Tuy đúng là… nhưng cần xem xét…
• 📝 Having said that,… – Sau khi nói điều đó (để introduce contrasting point)
• 📝 That said,… – Tuy nhiên (sophisticated way to introduce contrast)
• 📝 On the flip side,… – Mặt trái của vấn đề

Để giải thích hoặc làm rõ:

• 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là…
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác
• 📝 To put it simply,… – Nói đơn giản là
• 📝 Essentially,… – Về cơ bản
• 📝 At its core,… – Ở cốt lõi của vấn đề

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì
• 📝 In essence,… – Về bản chất
• 📝 To sum up,… – Tóm lại
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional (Past condition → Present result):

• Formula: If + past perfect, would + infinitive
• Ví dụ: “If I hadn’t taken that risk, I wouldn’t be where I am today.”
  (Nếu tôi không chấp nhận rủi ro đó, tôi sẽ không ở vị trí như hôm nay.)

Inversion for emphasis:

• Formula: Had + subject + past participle, would + infinitive
• Ví dụ: “Had I known how challenging it would be, I might have prepared differently, but I wouldn’t have changed my decision.”
  (Nếu tôi biết nó khó khăn như vậy, tôi có thể đã chuẩn bị khác, nhưng tôi vẫn không thay đổi quyết định.)

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clause:

• Formula: …, which/who + clause, …
• Ví dụ: “My decision to study abroad, which surprised everyone, turned out to be transformative.”
  (Quyết định du học của tôi, điều khiến mọi người ngạc nhiên, hóa ra lại mang tính chuyển đổi.)

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Reporting structures:

• It is thought/believed/said that…
• Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that taking risks is essential for personal growth.”
  (Người ta tin rằng chấp nhận rủi ro là cần thiết cho sự phát triển cá nhân.)

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What-cleft for emphasis:

• Formula: What + clause + is/was…
• Ví dụ: “What surprised people most was not the decision itself, but the timing.”
  (Điều khiến mọi người ngạc nhiên nhất không phải quyết định, mà là thời điểm.)

The thing that-cleft:

• Formula: The thing that + clause + is/was…
• Ví dụ: “The thing that made my decision so unexpected was that I had always seemed risk-averse.”
  (Điều khiến quyết định của tôi bất ngờ là tôi luôn tỏ ra e ngại rủi ro.)

5. Participle Clauses (Mệnh đề phân từ):

Present participle for simultaneous actions:

• Ví dụ: “Seeing their shocked reactions, I realized how unconventional my choice really was.”
  (Nhìn thấy phản ứng sốc của họ, tôi nhận ra lựa chọn của mình thực sự phi truyền thống như thế nào.)

Past participle for passive meaning:

• Ví dụ: “Faced with two equally attractive options, I had to dig deep to understand my true priorities.”
  (Đối mặt với hai lựa chọn hấp dẫn như nhau, tôi phải đào sâu để hiểu ưu tiên thật sự của mình.)

6. Inversion for Emphasis:

Rarely/Seldom/Never at beginning:

• Formula: Rarely/Seldom/Never + auxiliary + subject + verb
• Ví dụ: “Rarely had I felt so certain about a decision, despite everyone’s doubts.”
  (Hiếm khi tôi cảm thấy chắc chắn về một quyết định như vậy, dù mọi người đều hoài nghi.)

7. Hypothetical Language (Ngôn ngữ giả định):

Were to construction:

• Formula: Were + subject + to + infinitive
• Ví dụ: “Were I to make the decision again, I would choose the same path.”
  (Nếu tôi phải quyết định lại, tôi vẫn sẽ chọn con đường đó.)

---

Bài viết này cung cấp một roadmap toàn diện để bạn chinh phục chủ đề “describe a decision you made that surprised others” trong IELTS Speaking. Hãy nhớ rằng, chìa khóa để đạt band điểm cao không chỉ nằm ở việc thuộc lòng các câu trả lời mẫu, mà là hiểu được cấu trúc, logic và ngôn ngữ được sử dụng để bạn có thể áp dụng linh hoạt vào câu chuyện riêng của mình. Practice regularly, record yourself, và quan trọng nhất – hãy kể những câu chuyện thật của bạn với sự tự tin và authenticity!