IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe A Film Character You Would Like To Be Friends With” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề về nhân vật phim là một trong những đề tài phổ biến và thú vị nhất trong IELTS Speaking. Đề bài “Describe A Film Character You Would Like To Be Friends With” không chỉ kiểm tra khả năng miêu tả của bạn mà còn đòi hỏi bạn phải giải thích được những phẩm chất, tính cách khiến một nhân vật trở nên đáng để kết bạn. Đây là cơ hội tuyệt vời để thí sinh thể hiện vốn từ vựng về tính cách con người, khả năng phân tích character development, cũng như chia sẻ quan điểm cá nhân về tình bạn và các giá trị trong cuộc sống.

Tần suất xuất hiện: Chủ đề về phim ảnh và nhân vật điện ảnh xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong các kỳ thi IELTS từ năm 2020 đến nay, đặc biệt là các biến thể về “a film character”, “a fictional character”, “a character from a book or movie”. Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai: Cao do tính phổ biến và khả năng ứng dụng rộng rãi của chủ đề.

Những gì bạn sẽ học được từ bài viết này:

• 10+ câu hỏi thực tế về phim ảnh và nhân vật trong cả 3 Part
• Bài mẫu chi tiết theo 3 mức band điểm (6-7, 7.5-8, 8.5-9) với phân tích sâu
• 30+ từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm về tính cách, phẩm chất con người
• Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn Examiner
• Các lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục
• Discourse markers và grammatical structures giúp nâng band điểm

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn gọn về đời sống hàng ngày và sở thích cá nhân. Đối với chủ đề phim ảnh, examiner thường hỏi về thói quen xem phim, thể loại yêu thích, và trải nghiệm cá nhân của bạn.

Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả:

• Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi trong câu đầu tiên
• Mở rộng bằng lý do hoặc ví dụ cụ thể (2-3 câu tổng cộng)
• Sử dụng thì động từ phù hợp (hiện tại đơn cho thói quen)
• Thêm chi tiết cá nhân để câu trả lời tự nhiên hơn

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn chỉ có “Yes, I do” hoặc “No, I don’t”
• Dùng từ vựng quá đơn giản: “good movie”, “interesting film”
• Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ trải nghiệm bản thân
• Không sử dụng linking words để nối ý

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you like watching films?

Question 2: What kinds of films do you prefer to watch?

Question 3: How often do you go to the cinema?

Question 4: Did you watch many films when you were a child?

Question 5: Do you prefer watching films at home or in the cinema?

Question 6: What was the last film you watched?

Question 7: Do you like watching films alone or with friends?

Question 8: Are there any types of films you dislike?

Question 9: Do you think films have changed since you were younger?

Question 10: Would you like to work in the film industry?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you like watching films?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời Yes/No ngay lập tức
• Giải thích lý do (relaxation, entertainment, learning)
• Thêm frequency hoặc preference để câu trả lời phong phú hơn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I like watching films very much. I usually watch movies on weekends to relax after a busy week. I think films are a good way to entertain myself and learn about different cultures.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp, có lý do và frequency
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng đơn giản (good way, very much), cấu trúc câu cơ bản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response với basic vocabulary và simple structures, nhưng thiếu sophistication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Absolutely! I’m quite a film enthusiast, actually. I try to catch a movie at least once a week, whether it’s at the cinema or streaming at home. What I love most about films is that they’re a window into different worlds – they allow me to experience diverse perspectives and cultures without leaving my couch. Plus, after a hectic day at work, there’s nothing quite like immersing myself in a compelling storyline.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Vocabulary nâng cao: “film enthusiast”, “catch a movie”, “a window into different worlds”, “immersing myself in”
  • Cấu trúc đa dạng: “What I love most about…”, “there’s nothing quite like…”
  • Ý tưởng cụ thể và personal: đề cập cả cinema và streaming, giải thích rõ giá trị của phim
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Natural fluency, sophisticated vocabulary, complex structures, và personal perspective rõ ràng

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• film enthusiast: người đam mê phim ảnh
• catch a movie: xem một bộ phim (informal, natural)
• a window into different worlds: cánh cửa mở ra những thế giới khác
• experience diverse perspectives: trải nghiệm những góc nhìn đa dạng
• immersing myself in: đắm chìm vào

---

Question: What kinds of films do you prefer to watch?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu rõ thể loại yêu thích (có thể 1-2 thể loại)
• Giải thích tại sao thích (emotional connection, learning value, excitement)
• Có thể contrast với thể loại không thích

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I prefer watching action films and comedies. Action movies are exciting with many special effects, and comedies make me laugh and feel relaxed. I don’t really like horror films because they are too scary for me.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Clear preference, có lý do cơ bản, đề cập đến dislike
• Hạn chế: Adjectives đơn giản (exciting, scary), thiếu depth trong explanation
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicative nhưng thiếu precise vocabulary và sophisticated reasoning

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’m particularly drawn to thought-provoking dramas and psychological thrillers. What appeals to me about these genres is that they often explore the complexities of human nature and challenge conventional thinking. For instance, films like ‘Shawshank Redemption’ or ‘Inception’ really make you reflect on deeper themes – hope, reality, morality. That said, I’m not averse to the occasional lighthearted comedy when I need a mental break. I tend to steer clear of horror films, though – I find them unnecessarily unsettling.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Collocations tự nhiên: “drawn to”, “appeals to me”, “steer clear of”, “averse to”
  • Specific examples: Shawshank Redemption, Inception
  • Abstract nouns: complexities, morality, themes
  • Balanced view: thích drama nhưng cũng xem comedy
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Precise vocabulary, idiomatic expressions, detailed reasoning với concrete examples

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• drawn to: bị thu hút bởi
• thought-provoking: kích thích tư duy
• explore the complexities of human nature: khám phá sự phức tạp của bản chất con người
• challenge conventional thinking: thách thức tư duy thông thường
• averse to: không thích, tránh xa
• steer clear of: tránh xa, không dính líu tới

---

Question: How often do you go to the cinema?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu frequency cụ thể (once a week/month, rarely, frequently)
• Giải thích lý do cho frequency đó (busy schedule, streaming services, experience)
• Có thể so sánh with the past nếu có thay đổi

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I go to the cinema about once a month. I’m quite busy with work and study, so I don’t have much time. Also, cinema tickets are expensive in my city. I usually watch films at home on Netflix instead because it’s more convenient.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Frequency rõ ràng, có reasons (busy, expensive), đề cập alternative
• Hạn chế: Explanation chưa develop, từ vựng simple (quite busy, expensive)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear communication nhưng lacks elaboration và sophisticated language

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“To be honest, I don’t frequent the cinema as much as I used to – maybe once every couple of months at most. This is mainly because streaming platforms have become so accessible and affordable. However, I do make exceptions for big-budget blockbusters or films that really benefit from the big-screen experience – you know, those with stunning cinematography or immersive sound design. For instance, I made sure to catch ‘Dune’ at the cinema because the visual spectacle would’ve been lost on a small screen. There’s also something about the communal atmosphere of a cinema that you can’t replicate at home.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Natural discourse markers: “To be honest”, “However”, “For instance”
  • Specific terminology: “big-budget blockbusters”, “stunning cinematography”, “immersive sound design”
  • Nuanced explanation: giải thích khi nào thì đi cinema vs khi nào xem nhà
  • Concrete example: Dune
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluent delivery, topic-specific vocabulary, detailed reasoning với acknowledgment of both options

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• frequent (verb): lui tới thường xuyên
• streaming platforms: nền tảng xem phim trực tuyến
• big-budget blockbusters: phim bom tấn kinh phí lớn
• benefit from the big-screen experience: được lợi từ trải nghiệm màn hình lớn
• stunning cinematography: kỹ thuật quay phim tuyệt đẹp
• visual spectacle: cảnh tượng hình ảnh nổi bật
• communal atmosphere: không khí cộng đồng

Thí sinh đang luyện tập trả lời câu hỏi IELTS Speaking Part 1 về chủ đề phim ảnh

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại quan trọng nhất, kéo dài 2-3 phút không bị ngắt. Bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị với giấy và bút để ghi chú.

Chiến lược thành công:

• Sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị: Ghi keywords cho mỗi bullet point, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Nói đủ 2 phút: Aim for 2-2.5 phút, tối thiểu 1.5 phút
• Cover tất cả bullet points: Examiner đánh giá khả năng trả lời đầy đủ yêu cầu
• Phần “explain” là quan trọng nhất: Đây là nơi bạn demonstrate critical thinking
• Sử dụng thì quá khứ nếu kể về phim đã xem

Lỗi thường gặp:

• Không dùng hết thời gian chuẩn bị, bắt đầu nói ngay
• Nói quá ngắn (dưới 1.5 phút) hoặc dừng đột ngột
• Bỏ sót một bullet point quan trọng
• Tập trung quá nhiều vào cốt truyện phim thay vì nhân vật
• Không giải thích rõ tại sao muốn kết bạn với nhân vật đó

Cue Card

Describe a film character you would like to be friends with

You should say:

• Who this character is
• What film this character appears in
• What this character is like
• And explain why you would like to be friends with this character

Phân Tích Đề Bài

• Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person (fictional character)
• Thì động từ: Hiện tại đơn khi miêu tả character (vì character vẫn tồn tại trong phim), quá khứ đơn khi kể về lúc xem phim
• Bullet points phải cover:
  1. Who: Tên nhân vật, vai trò trong phim
  2. What film: Tên phim, có thể thêm genre, director
  3. What like: Appearance, personality, characteristics, values
  4. Why be friends: Đây là phần QUAN TRỌNG NHẤT – phải giải thích rõ ràng những phẩm chất nào khiến character này đáng để kết bạn
• Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần này chiếm 40-50% thời gian nói, thể hiện critical thinking và ability to analyze character traits

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

“I would like to talk about Forrest Gump from the film with the same name. This is a very famous American movie from the 1990s about a man with a low IQ but a kind heart.

Forrest Gump is a simple but honest person. He always tells the truth and keeps his promises. In the film, he does many things like running across America, playing ping pong, and starting a shrimp business. He is very loyal to his friends, especially his friend Bubba who died in the war.

What I like about Forrest is that he never gives up. Even when people laugh at him or think he is stupid, he continues to try his best. He is also very kind to everyone he meets. For example, he takes care of his mother when she is sick and waits for Jenny, the girl he loves, for many years.

I would like to be friends with Forrest because I think he would be a very loyal and honest friend. He would never betray you or lie to you. In today’s world, it is hard to find people who are really sincere. Also, his positive attitude would make me feel happy and motivated. When I have problems, I think he would support me and encourage me to keep going, just like he never gave up in his own life.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có basic linking (also, for example, because), logic flow nhưng còn mechanical. Một số hesitation nhẹ có thể xảy ra
Lexical Resource	6-7	Vocabulary adequate (kind heart, loyal, sincere, positive attitude) nhưng chưa sophisticated. Có repetition (kind/kind)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Mix của simple và complex sentences. Có relative clauses (who died, who are really sincere). Tenses cơ bản chính xác
Pronunciation	6-7	Clear và understandable, word stress cơ bản đúng

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
• ✅ Có examples cụ thể từ phim (running, ping pong, caring for mother)
• ✅ Giải thích rõ why want to be friends
• ✅ Structure rõ ràng theo đúng cue card

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary chưa varied (kind xuất hiện nhiều lần, simple/honest là basic adjectives)
• ⚠️ Thiếu idiomatic expressions và advanced collocations
• ⚠️ Ideas chưa deeply analyzed (chỉ nêu qualities chưa elaborate)
• ⚠️ Có thể thêm personal reflection sâu hơn

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

“I’d like to talk about Andy Dufresne, the protagonist from ‘The Shawshank Redemption’, which is widely regarded as one of the greatest films ever made. It’s a drama set in the 1940s about a banker who’s wrongly convicted of murder and sentenced to life in Shawshank State Penitentiary.

What makes Andy truly remarkable is his unwavering resilience and quiet determination. Despite being thrown into a brutal prison environment where most people would lose all hope, he maintains his dignity and inner strength. He’s highly intelligent and resourceful – for instance, he helps the prison guards with their taxes and eventually establishes a prison library. But what I find most admirable is his patience – he spends nearly two decades meticulously planning his escape while appearing to be a model prisoner.

In terms of personality, Andy is introspective and thoughtful rather than loud or showy. He has this calm demeanor that commands respect without him having to say much. He’s also incredibly loyal – he never forgets his friend Red and eventually helps him find freedom too. What really strikes me about Andy is his belief that hope is a powerful thing – even in the darkest circumstances, he never lets the system break his spirit.

I would genuinely love to be friends with someone like Andy because I think he embodies qualities that are rare in today’s world. Firstly, his mental fortitude would be incredibly inspiring – having a friend who can stay positive and focused even in adversity would help me deal with my own challenges better. Secondly, his unwavering integrity means you could trust him completely. He proved throughout the film that he’s someone who stands by his principles no matter what. Finally, I think his wisdom and perspective on life would make every conversation meaningful. He’s the type of person who would give you thoughtful advice rather than empty words. In short, Andy represents the kind of friend who would make you a better person simply through their presence.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Smooth delivery với natural linking (Firstly, Secondly, Finally, In short). Cohesion tốt giữa các ý. Minimal hesitation
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range: “unwavering resilience”, “introspective”, “mental fortitude”, “embodies qualities”. Collocations tự nhiên: “commands respect”, “stands by principles”
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Complex structures: relative clauses, conditionals (would help me deal), passives. Tenses accurate và flexible
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear với good intonation patterns, sentence stress appropriate

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“kind heart”, “never gives up”	“unwavering resilience”, “mental fortitude”, “embodies qualities”
Grammar	“He is very loyal to his friends”	“He’s incredibly loyal – he never forgets his friend Red and eventually helps him find freedom too”
Ideas	Basic qualities (loyal, honest, positive)	Deeper analysis (resilience in adversity, wisdom, perspective on life, inspiration)

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

“I’d like to describe Elle Woods from the film ‘Legally Blonde’ – and I know this might seem like an unconventional choice, but hear me out, because this character is far more multidimensional than people give her credit for.

Elle is the protagonist of this early 2000s comedy-drama, initially portrayed as a stereotypical California sorority girl who follows her ex-boyfriend to Harvard Law School. However, what makes her such a compelling character is her remarkable evolution throughout the narrative. She defies every stereotype thrown at her and proves that intelligence and femininity aren’t mutually exclusive. What I find particularly fascinating is that she achieves this without compromising her authentic self – she doesn’t become cynical or harsh to succeed in a male-dominated field; she remains kind, optimistic, and true to her values.

In terms of personality, Elle is infectiously positive without being naive. She has this unshakeable self-belief that’s genuinely inspiring – when everyone underestimates her, instead of internalizing their doubt, she uses it as fuel to prove them wrong. She’s also remarkably emotionally intelligent – there’s a scene where she helps a nail technician who’s being mistreated, showing that she’s attuned to other people’s struggles despite her privileged background. What really resonates with me is her collaborative rather than competitive spirit – unlike most law students around her who backstab each other to get ahead, Elle lifts others up.

Now, why would I want to be friends with Elle? Well, for starters, she epitomizes the kind of friend who would champion your dreams unconditionally. She’s demonstrated time and again that she celebrates other people’s success rather than feeling threatened by it. In today’s world, where there’s so much comparison culture and social competition, having a friend with Elle’s genuine enthusiasm for others would be incredibly refreshing.

Moreover, Elle’s resilience in the face of discrimination is something I deeply admire. She was dismissed as superficial and incompetent based purely on her appearance and interests, yet she never let others’ narrow-minded perceptions define her capabilities. That kind of friend would empower you to embrace your authentic self rather than conforming to others’ expectations. I think we could all use someone in our lives who reminds us that we don’t need to fit into prescribed boxes to be successful or worthy.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, Elle embodies optimism without toxic positivity. She acknowledges challenges but doesn’t wallow in negativity. She finds creative solutions and maintains her joie de vivre even when facing setbacks. That’s the kind of energy that’s contagious in the best possible way – being around someone like that would help you reframe difficulties as opportunities rather than obstacles.

In essence, Elle Woods represents a rare combination of intelligence, kindness, authenticity, and resilience – qualities that don’t often coexist in such harmony. She’s proof that you can be both ambitious and compassionate, both strong and gentle. That’s exactly the type of friend who would not only enrich your life but also inspire you to become your best self.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Completely fluent với sophisticated linking (“hear me out”, “moreover”, “in essence”). Natural topic development với smooth transitions. Zero hesitation
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Sophisticated range: “multidimensional”, “defies every stereotype”, “infectious”, “epitomizes”, “toxic positivity”, “joie de vivre”. Idiomatic: “give credit for”, “lift others up”, “wallow in negativity”
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range of structures với complete control: complex conditionals, cleft sentences (“That’s the kind of…”), inversion, passive voices. Perfect tense control
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Native-like features với excellent stress, rhythm, intonation conveying nuanced meaning

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:

• Không có hesitation, filler words được dùng naturally (“I know this might seem…, but hear me out”)
• Transitions mượt mà giữa các phần (For starters, Moreover, Finally)
• Topic development logic và convincing

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• Precise adjectives: “multidimensional”, “compelling”, “infectious”, “unshakeable”
• Advanced collocations: “defies every stereotype”, “champion your dreams”, “comparison culture”
• Idiomatic expressions: “lift others up”, “reframe difficulties”, “enrich your life”
• Abstract nouns: “resilience”, “authenticity”, “joie de vivre”

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Cleft sentences: “What makes her compelling is…”, “What I find fascinating is…”
• Conditionals: “That kind of friend would empower you to…”
• Relative clauses: “who would champion your dreams”, “where there’s so much comparison”
• Passive for emphasis: “was dismissed as superficial”

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:

• Không chỉ describe character mà analyze complexity và contradiction (girlish but smart)
• Kết nối với broader social themes (comparison culture, toxic positivity, gender stereotypes)
• Personal reflection genuine (we could all use someone…)
• Sophisticated reasoning về tại sao friendship valuable

Thí sinh tự tin trình bày bài nói IELTS Speaking Part 2 về nhân vật phim mà họ muốn kết bạn

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Sau Part 2, examiner thường hỏi 1-2 câu ngắn để transition sang Part 3:

Question 1: Have you watched this film more than once?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, I have watched it two or three times. I really enjoy this film, so I watch it again when I have free time.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Absolutely! I’ve actually watched it multiple times over the years, and it’s one of those films that reveals new layers each time you watch it. You notice subtle details and nuances in the character development that you might have missed initially.”

---

Question 2: Do you think this character is realistic?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“I think some parts are realistic and some are not. Her personality is realistic, but some events in the film are exaggerated for entertainment.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“That’s an interesting question. I’d say Elle is somewhat idealized – I mean, her level of optimism and success might be a bit far-fetched in reality. However, what makes her emotionally authentic is that her struggles with being underestimated and stereotyped are experiences many people can relate to on a personal level. So while the surface details might be Hollywood-ized, the underlying themes are quite grounded in reality.”

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi trừu tượng và phức tạp hơn, yêu cầu bạn phân tích, so sánh, và đưa ra quan điểm về các vấn đề xã hội liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2.

Yêu cầu then chốt:

• Phân tích sâu: Không chỉ nêu ý kiến mà phải giải thích WHY
• Nhiều góc độ: Thừa nhận complexity, đưa ra different perspectives
• Examples cụ thể: Từ xã hội, không chỉ cá nhân
• Abstract thinking: Sử dụng abstract nouns và concepts

Chiến lược thành công:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời (3-5 câu minimum)
• Structure: Direct answer → Reason 1 + example → Reason 2 + example → Conclusion/nuance
• Sử dụng discourse markers để organize ideas
• Tentative language để show sophistication (tends to, might, to some extent)

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời ngắn như Part 1 (chỉ 1-2 câu)
• Không develop reasons với examples
• Thiếu từ vựng abstract và academic
• Không acknowledge different viewpoints
• Over-generalizing (“Everyone thinks…”, “All people…”)

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Film Characters and Their Influence

Question 1: Why do you think people like certain film characters?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Explain reasons (Why question)
• Key words: like, film characters
• Cách tiếp cận: Đưa ra 2-3 reasons khác nhau (identification, aspiration, entertainment), có examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think people like film characters for different reasons. First, if the character is similar to them, they can understand and connect with the character easily. Second, some characters are very brave or talented, so people admire them and want to be like them. Finally, some characters are funny and make people laugh, which helps them relax and enjoy the film.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear với First, Second, Finally
• Vocabulary: Basic (similar, brave, talented, funny)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Coherent và adequate nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Well, I think people’s affinity for certain characters often stems from a combination of factors.

On one level, there’s the aspect of identification – we tend to gravitate towards characters whose struggles or experiences mirror our own. When we see someone on screen dealing with challenges we’ve faced, whether it’s navigating difficult relationships or overcoming self-doubt, it creates a powerful emotional resonance. It’s that sense of ‘Someone finally gets what I’m going through.’

Beyond that, there’s also the aspirational element. Many beloved characters embody qualities we wish we had – courage, wit, resilience, or moral integrity. Take characters like Wonder Woman or Tony Stark – they allow audiences to vicariously experience a more heroic or accomplished version of themselves. It’s a form of wish fulfillment that’s both entertaining and potentially inspiring.

And I’d say there’s also a purely aesthetic or entertainment dimension – sometimes we simply find a character charismatic or entertaining because of how they’re written or performed, regardless of whether we relate to them personally. A compelling villain, for instance, can be as captivating as a hero, not because we want to be like them, but because they’re fascinatingly complex.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized với “On one level”, “Beyond that”, “And I’d say” để separate different reasons
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated: “affinity for”, “stems from”, “gravitate towards”, “emotional resonance”, “embody qualities”, “vicariously experience”, “wish fulfillment”
• Grammar: Complex structures: relative clauses, noun clauses, whether…or, regardless of
• Critical Thinking: Multiple layers (identification, aspiration, entertainment) với nuanced explanation

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Well”, “On one level”, “Beyond that”, “And I’d say”
• Tentative language: “often”, “tend to”, “can be”
• Abstract nouns: “identification”, “aspiration”, “resilience”, “integrity”, “dimension”

---

Question 2: Do you think film characters can influence people’s behavior in real life?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Evaluation
• Key words: influence, behavior, real life
• Cách tiếp cận: Yes/No → Explain how (positive/negative examples) → Acknowledge limitations

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think film characters can influence people’s behavior. For example, when children watch superhero movies, they may want to help other people like the heroes do. However, some violent characters might make people, especially young people, become more aggressive. So I think it depends on what kind of character and what kind of person is watching.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear opinion → positive example → negative example → qualification
• Vocabulary: Basic (help, violent, aggressive)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses the question adequately nhưng examples chưa develop và vocabulary limited

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Absolutely, though I’d say the extent of influence is often more subtle and nuanced than people realize.

Film characters can definitely shape attitudes and behaviors, particularly when it comes to social norms and values. For instance, the proliferation of strong female characters in recent years – think Rey from Star Wars or Moana – has arguably contributed to shifting perceptions about gender roles and capabilities. Young girls now have a wider array of role models who demonstrate that leadership and bravery aren’t exclusively masculine traits.

That said, I think the influence operates on a spectrum. For some viewers, especially impressionable young people, characters can have a profound impact on their worldview and self-perception. There’s actually research showing that exposure to certain character types can reinforce stereotypes or, conversely, challenge preconceived notions. For example, positive portrayals of diverse ethnicities and cultures in film have been shown to reduce prejudice among audiences.

However, I’d caution against overestimating this influence. Most people have sufficient critical faculties to distinguish between fiction and reality. While a compelling character might inspire someone to be braver or kinder, it’s unlikely that one film will fundamentally alter someone’s core personality. The influence is more about planting seeds or reinforcing existing inclinations rather than causing dramatic transformations.

There’s also the concern about negative influences – violence, toxic behaviors, or unrealistic standards. But I think this is where media literacy becomes crucial. Teaching people, especially children, to critically analyze what they consume rather than passively absorb it is key to mitigating potential harm while still allowing them to enjoy and learn from fictional characters.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position → positive influence with example → spectrum acknowledgment → limitations → negative aspect with solution
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: “proliferation of”, “shifting perceptions”, “array of role models”, “operates on a spectrum”, “preconceived notions”, “critical faculties”, “mitigating potential harm”
• Grammar: Full range: cleft sentences, conditionals, passives, complex noun phrases
• Critical Thinking: Balanced view acknowledging both positive and negative influences, research reference, considers different audiences, proposes solution

💡 Key Language Features:

• Hedging: “I’d say”, “arguably”, “I’d caution against”
• Academic style: “operates on a spectrum”, “there’s actually research showing”, “media literacy”
• Discourse markers: “For instance”, “That said”, “However”, “There’s also”

---

Theme 2: Changes in Film Industry and Characters

Question 1: How have film characters changed over the past few decades?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare/Contrast (past vs present)
• Key words: changed, past few decades
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify 2-3 key changes (diversity, complexity, representation) với examples từ past và present

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Film characters have changed a lot. In the past, most heroes were white men and women usually played small roles. Now, we can see more female heroes and characters from different countries and backgrounds. Also, characters today are more realistic and have more complex personalities. For example, superheroes now have problems and weaknesses, not just superpowers.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Then vs now comparison with example
• Vocabulary: Simple (a lot, small roles, complex, problems)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear comparison nhưng lacks specific examples và sophisticated analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“The evolution of film characters over recent decades has been quite remarkable, reflecting broader societal shifts in terms of representation and complexity.

Perhaps the most conspicuous change has been in diversity and inclusion. If you look at Hollywood films from the 80s or 90s, they were overwhelmingly dominated by white, male protagonists, with women and minorities typically relegated to supporting roles or one-dimensional stereotypes. Fast forward to today, and we’re seeing a much richer tapestry of characters – films like ‘Black Panther’ or ‘Crazy Rich Asians’ have mainstream protagonists from underrepresented communities, and this reflects a growing recognition that audiences are diverse and want to see themselves represented on screen.

Beyond demographics, there’s also been a shift toward more nuanced characterization. Classic film characters tended to be fairly archetypal – the unambiguously heroic protagonist versus the purely evil antagonist. Contemporary cinema, however, embraces moral ambiguity. Characters like Walter White from Breaking Bad or even heroes in the Marvel universe are deeply flawed and make questionable decisions. This speaks to audiences’ appetite for complexity and psychological realism rather than simple black-and-white morality.

I’d also point to the evolution of female characters specifically. We’ve moved away from women being merely love interests or damsels in distress to seeing them as fully-realized individuals with their own agency and story arcs. The Bechdel Test, which measures whether films feature substantive conversations between women about something other than men, has gained traction as a metric, pushing filmmakers to write more dimensional female characters.

That said, I think it’s important not to overstate the progress. There’s still a long way to go in terms of equitable representation, particularly for LGBTQ+ individuals, people with disabilities, and certain ethnic groups. But the trajectory is undeniably positive, and I’m optimistic that we’ll continue seeing more diverse and authentic portrayals moving forward.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Introduction → Change 1 (diversity) with examples → Change 2 (complexity) → Change 3 (female characters) → Qualification về remaining challenges
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated: “conspicuous”, “relegated to”, “tapestry”, “nuanced characterization”, “archetypal”, “moral ambiguity”, “deeply flawed”, “agency”, “trajectory”
• Grammar: Complex: passives, conditionals, relative clauses, present perfect for change over time
• Critical Thinking: Specific examples (Black Panther, Breaking Bad, Bechdel Test), acknowledges progress while noting limitations

---

Question 2: Do you think filmmakers have a responsibility to create positive role models?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion about responsibility/obligation
• Key words: responsibility, positive role models
• Cách tiếp cận: State position → Reasons for/against → Balanced view → Personal stance

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think filmmakers have some responsibility to create good characters, especially in movies for children. Young people learn from what they see, so filmmakers should be careful. However, filmmakers also need freedom to tell different kinds of stories, including stories with bad characters. So it’s a balance between responsibility and creativity.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Opinion → reason → counter-argument → balance
• Vocabulary: Simple (good characters, bad characters, freedom)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses both sides nhưng lacks depth và specific argumentation

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is quite a contentious issue, and I think the answer hinges on how we define ‘responsibility’ and what we mean by ‘positive role models.’

On one hand, I do believe filmmakers have a certain moral obligation, particularly when their work is likely to reach young or impressionable audiences. Films are powerful cultural artifacts that can shape societal values and normalize certain behaviors. When filmmakers consistently portray, say, toxic masculinity or unhealthy relationships without critical context, they’re perpetuating harmful norms. In that sense, there’s an argument that they should exercise some social responsibility in the messages they disseminate.

However, I’d push back against the idea that all characters need to be conventionally ‘positive’ or morally exemplary. Art, including cinema, should have the freedom to explore the full spectrum of human experience – including darkness, moral ambiguity, and flawed individuals. Some of the most thought-provoking and culturally significant films feature deeply problematic characters precisely because they force us to grapple with uncomfortable truths about human nature. Sanitizing all characters into perfect role models would result in shallow, unrealistic storytelling that ultimately diminishes art’s power to provoke thought and conversation.

What I think is crucial is how these characters are portrayed. There’s a difference between glorifying negative behaviors and depicting them in a way that invites critical reflection. For instance, ‘Breaking Bad’ features a protagonist who becomes a drug kingpin, but the show never romanticizes his choices – instead, it systematically shows the devastating consequences of his actions. That’s responsible storytelling even with an ‘anti-hero.’

Ultimately, I believe the responsibility lies not solely with filmmakers but also with audiences, educators, and parents to cultivate media literacy. We need to equip people, especially young viewers, with the critical thinking skills to engage with complex characters and narratives rather than expecting all media to spoon-feed us morally simplistic tales.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Position statement → Argument FOR → Argument AGAINST → Nuance (how matters) → Balanced conclusion
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: “contentious”, “hinges on”, “cultural artifacts”, “perpetuating harmful norms”, “push back against”, “sanitizing”, “romanticizes”, “spoon-feed”
• Grammar: Full range with perfect control: relative clauses, conditional structures, cleft sentences, complex noun phrases
• Critical Thinking: Acknowledges complexity, considers different stakeholders, distinguishes between depiction and glorification, proposes solution

Phân tích chi tiết cách trả lời câu hỏi IELTS Speaking Part 3 về ảnh hưởng của nhân vật phim

Theme 3: The Psychology of Character Connection

Question 1: Why do people sometimes feel more connected to fictional characters than real people?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Explain phenomenon
• Key words: feel connected, fictional vs real
• Cách tiếp cận: Psychological reasons, compare fictional vs real relationships, acknowledge trend

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think this happens because fictional characters are easier to understand than real people. In films, we can see their thoughts and feelings clearly, but with real people, we don’t always know what they’re thinking. Also, fictional characters don’t disappoint us or hurt us like real people sometimes do. So some people prefer fictional relationships because they feel safer.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Reason 1 → Reason 2 → Conclusion
• Vocabulary: Simple (easier, clearly, disappoint, safer)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Logical explanation nhưng lacks psychological terminology và depth

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“That’s a fascinating psychological phenomenon that I think speaks to several aspects of modern life and human nature.

First and foremost, fictional characters offer a level of intimacy and transparency that real-life relationships rarely provide. Through films, we’re granted access to a character’s internal monologue, motivations, and vulnerabilities in a way that’s simply impossible with real people. We see their backstory, understand their trauma, and witness their character arc. This omniscient perspective creates a sense of knowing someone completely, which is incredibly rare in actual relationships where people naturally maintain certain boundaries and private thoughts.

Moreover, relationships with fictional characters are inherently safe and non-reciprocal. They can’t reject you, judge you, or disappoint you in the way real people can. There’s no emotional labor or conflict resolution required. For people who’ve experienced relationship trauma or who struggle with social anxiety, fictional connections can provide emotional fulfillment without the vulnerability and risk that come with real interpersonal relationships. It’s escapism, certainly, but it can also be emotionally protective.

I’d also suggest that fictional characters are often idealized versions of people. They’re carefully crafted by writers to be compelling, consistent, and often more admirable than the flawed, contradictory individuals we encounter in reality. They embody specific traits – loyalty, bravery, humor – in their purest form without the messiness that characterizes real human beings. So when someone forms an attachment to a fictional character, they’re often connecting with an archetype or ideal rather than the complex, unpredictable nature of actual people.

That said, while I understand these connections, I do think there’s a danger in substituting fictional relationships for real ones. Real relationships, for all their challenges, provide genuine reciprocity, growth, and human connection that fiction simply cannot replicate. The imperfections and conflicts in real relationships are actually what make them meaningful and foster personal development.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Introduction → Reason 1 (intimacy/transparency) → Reason 2 (safety) → Reason 3 (idealization) → Warning/balance
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated psychological terms: “omniscient perspective”, “emotional labor”, “reciprocity”, “archetype”, “escapism”, “vulnerability”
• Grammar: Complex with full accuracy: relative clauses, nominalizations, conditionals
• Critical Thinking: Multi-layered analysis considering psychology, modern life, and potential dangers

---

Question 2: Should there be limits on what kinds of characters can be shown in films?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion about censorship/regulation
• Key words: limits, kinds of characters
• Cách tiếp cận: Complex issue → considerations for limits → considerations against → balanced position

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“This is a difficult question. I think there should be some limits, especially for children’s films. Very violent or scary characters might be harmful for young children. However, for adult films, I think there should be more freedom because adults can decide what they want to watch. Maybe films should have clear age ratings so people can choose carefully.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Acknowledge difficulty → limits for children → freedom for adults → solution (ratings)
• Vocabulary: Basic (difficult, harmful, freedom, decide)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Reasonable position nhưng lacks exploration of nuances và specific examples

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This question delves into the perennial tension between artistic freedom and social responsibility, and I don’t think there are easy answers.

In principle, I’m generally wary of censorship because it can become a slippery slope. History has shown us that restrictions on artistic expression often reflect the prejudices of those in power rather than genuine concerns about harm. What one society deems offensive or inappropriate, another might see as important social commentary. Stifling creative freedom can impoverish culture and prevent filmmakers from tackling challenging subjects that society needs to grapple with.

That being said, I do think there’s legitimate grounds for certain boundaries, particularly around content that could directly cause harm. For instance, characters that explicitly incite violence, promote hate speech, or exploit vulnerable groups – these raise ethical questions that go beyond simple artistic expression. There’s also the specific consideration of age-appropriate content. While I believe adult audiences should have broad access to diverse narratives, children are developmentally vulnerable, and certain character portrayals – extreme violence, sexual content, or traumatic themes – could be genuinely damaging to young psyches.

However, rather than outright bans, I think the solution lies in robust rating systems and transparent content warnings that empower consumers to make informed choices. Parents should be equipped with clear information about what their children will be exposed to, and adults should be able to self-select their media consumption. This approach respects both the autonomy of audiences and the creative freedom of filmmakers.

I’d also emphasize the importance of contextual representation. A character who espouses racist views, for example, isn’t inherently problematic if the film itself condemns those views or uses the character to critique such ideologies. The key is whether the narrative endorses harmful attitudes or examines them critically.

In essence, I believe in minimal restrictions on the types of characters that can be portrayed, coupled with strong educational frameworks around media literacy and comprehensive labeling systems that allow for individual agency in consumption choices.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Introduction of complexity → Argument against censorship → Argument for some limits → Solution (ratings + warnings) → Important distinction (context matters) → Conclusion
• Vocabulary: Academic and sophisticated: “delves into”, “perennial tension”, “slippery slope”, “stifling”, “legitimate grounds for”, “developmentally vulnerable”, “espouses”, “condemns”, “coupled with”
• Grammar: Full range: passives, conditionals, relative clauses, cleft sentences, parallelism
• Critical Thinking: Highly nuanced, considers multiple stakeholders, distinguishes between types of harm, proposes practical solutions, acknowledges complexity without over-simplifying

Từ Vựng và Cụm Từ Quan Trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
protagonist	n	/prəʊˈtæɡənɪst/	nhân vật chính	Andy Dufresne is the protagonist of the film.	main protagonist, central protagonist, female/male protagonist
antagonist	n	/ænˈtæɡənɪst/	nhân vật phản diện	The antagonist creates obstacles for the hero.	main antagonist, ruthless antagonist, formidable antagonist
character arc	n	/ˈkærəktə ɑːk/	sự phát triển nhân vật	Her character arc shows transformation from weak to strong.	compelling character arc, complete character arc, develop a character arc
embody	v	/ɪmˈbɒdi/	thể hiện, hiện thân	Elle embodies optimism and resilience.	embody qualities, embody values, embody principles
compelling	adj	/kəmˈpelɪŋ/	hấp dẫn, thuyết phục	She’s a compelling character with depth.	compelling story, compelling performance, compelling reason
multidimensional	adj	/ˌmʌltiˌdaɪˈmenʃənl/	đa chiều, phức tạp	The character is multidimensional, not one-dimensional.	multidimensional character, multidimensional personality
resilience	n	/rɪˈzɪliəns/	sức bật, khả năng phục hồi	His resilience in adversity is inspiring.	show resilience, demonstrate resilience, build resilience
unwavering	adj	/ʌnˈweɪvərɪŋ/	không dao động, kiên định	She has unwavering determination.	unwavering commitment, unwavering loyalty, unwavering support
introspective	adj	/ˌɪntrəˈspektɪv/	hay tự suy ngẫm	He’s quite introspective and thoughtful.	introspective nature, introspective person, introspective character
charismatic	adj	/ˌkærɪzˈmætɪk/	có sức hút, thu hút	The character is naturally charismatic.	charismatic leader, charismatic personality, charismatic presence
moral integrity	n	/ˈmɒrəl ɪnˈteɡrəti/	tính chính trực đạo đức	He maintains his moral integrity throughout.	demonstrate moral integrity, uphold moral integrity, have moral integrity
mental fortitude	n	/ˈmentl ˈfɔːtɪtjuːd/	sức mạnh tinh thần	Her mental fortitude helps her survive.	show mental fortitude, require mental fortitude, build mental fortitude
relatable	adj	/rɪˈleɪtəbl/	dễ đồng cảm, gần gũi	The character is very relatable to young adults.	relatable character, relatable story, highly relatable
defy stereotypes	v phrase	/dɪˈfaɪ ˈsteriətaɪps/	phá vỡ định kiến	She defies stereotypes about women.	defy gender stereotypes, defy conventional stereotypes
emotionally intelligent	adj phrase	/ɪˈməʊʃnəli ɪnˈtelɪdʒənt/	thông minh cảm xúc	She’s emotionally intelligent and empathetic.	emotionally intelligent person, emotionally intelligent behavior
authentic self	n phrase	/ɔːˈθentɪk self/	bản ngã thật	He embraces his authentic self.	stay true to authentic self, express authentic self
character development	n	/ˈkærəktə dɪˈveləpmənt/	sự phát triển nhân vật	The film has excellent character development.	strong character development, lack character development
backstory	n	/ˈbækstɔːri/	tiền sử, quá khứ nhân vật	The character’s backstory explains her motivation.	tragic backstory, detailed backstory, reveal backstory
vulnerability	n	/ˌvʌlnərəˈbɪləti/	tính dễ bị tổn thương	His vulnerability makes him more human.	show vulnerability, emotional vulnerability, embrace vulnerability
empowering	adj	/ɪmˈpaʊərɪŋ/	trao quyền, khích lệ	The character is empowering to young girls.	empowering message, empowering story, empowering character

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
stand by one’s principles	kiên định với nguyên tắc của mình	He stands by his principles even under pressure.	7.5-9
lift others up	nâng đỡ người khác	She lifts others up rather than competing with them.	7.5-9
lose all hope	mất hết hy vọng	Despite circumstances that would make others lose all hope, he persevered.	6-7
command respect	được tôn trọng (một cách tự nhiên)	His quiet demeanor commands respect.	7.5-9
mirror one’s own	phản ánh trải nghiệm của chính mình	Characters whose struggles mirror our own resonate deeply.	7.5-9
vicariously experience	trải nghiệm gián tiếp	We vicariously experience adventure through film characters.	8-9
a window into different worlds	cánh cửa mở ra thế giới khác	Films provide a window into different worlds and cultures.	7.5-8
reframe difficulties as opportunities	nhìn khó khăn như cơ hội	She helps people reframe difficulties as opportunities for growth.	8-9
enrich one’s life	làm phong phú cuộc sống	That kind of friend would enrich your life immeasurably.	7.5-8
emotionally resonate	gây tiếng vang về mặt cảm xúc	The character’s journey emotionally resonates with audiences.	7.5-9
push back against	phản đối, chống lại	I’d push back against the idea that all characters must be positive.	8-9
a slippery slope	dốc trơn (dẫn đến hệ lụy)	Censorship can be a slippery slope toward oppression.	8-9

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Khi cần một chút thời gian suy nghĩ
  • “Well, I think people’s affinity for certain characters…”
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra thông tin bất ngờ hoặc sửa chữa
  • “Actually, I’ve watched this film multiple times.”
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi chia sẻ ý kiến thật
  • “To be honest, I don’t go to the cinema as much as I used to.”
• 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra đánh giá cá nhân
  • “I’d say that the influence operates on a spectrum.”

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó
  • “On top of that, she’s incredibly loyal to her friends.”
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa
  • “What’s more, the character demonstrates remarkable resilience.”
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra còn
  • “Beyond that, there’s also the aspirational element.”
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
  • “Not to mention, the visual effects are stunning.”

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
  • “On the one hand, filmmakers have responsibility. On the other hand, they need creative freedom.”
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét
  • “While it’s true that characters influence behavior, we also need to consider individual agency.”
• 📝 That said,… – Tuy nhiên, điều đó nói lên rằng
  • “That said, I think the influence is more subtle than people realize.”

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại
  • “All in all, Elle represents qualities I deeply admire.”
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì
  • “At the end of the day, it’s about finding characters that resonate with you.”
• 📝 In essence,… – Về bản chất
  • “In essence, this character embodies everything I value in friendship.”
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Rút cục, cuối cùng
  • “Ultimately, the responsibility lies with both filmmakers and audiences.”

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional (Kết hợp quá khứ và hiện tại):

• “If she hadn’t maintained her optimism (past), she wouldn’t be such an inspiring character today (present).”
• Dùng để show consequences kéo dài từ quá khứ đến hiện tại

Inversion (Đảo ngữ với conditional):

• “Had I not watched this film, I wouldn’t have understood the importance of resilience.”
• Formal hơn, suitable cho Part 3

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses (Mệnh đề không xác định):

• “Elle Woods, who initially appears stereotypical, actually demonstrates remarkable depth.”
• Thêm thông tin bổ sung về character

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal structures:

• “It is widely believed that film characters can influence behavior.”
• “It has been shown that exposure to diverse characters reduces prejudice.”
• Dùng để reference research hoặc common beliefs

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What-clefts (để emphasize):

• “What I find most admirable about this character is his unwavering integrity.”
• “What makes her compelling is her ability to remain authentic.”

It-clefts:

• “It was her resilience that inspired me the most.”
• “It’s the complexity of the character that makes the film memorable.”

5. Inversion for emphasis:

• “Rarely have I seen such a well-developed character.”
• “Never before had a film character resonated with me so deeply.”
• Dùng tiết kiệm trong Part 2/3 để tạo impact

6. Participle Clauses:

• “Having watched the film multiple times, I can say the character reveals new layers each viewing.”
• “Faced with seemingly insurmountable obstacles, she never loses hope.”
• Giúp câu văn sophisticated và concise

Bài viết này cung cấp roadmap toàn diện giúp bạn tự tin chinh phục chủ đề “Describe a film character you would like to be friends with” trong IELTS Speaking. Hãy nhớ rằng, key to success không phải là học thuộc template mà là hiểu rõ tiêu chí chấm điểm, phát triển khả năng tư duy phản biện, và thực hành đều đặn với feedback chất lượng. Với sự chuẩn bị kỹ lưỡng và authentic delivery, bạn hoàn toàn có thể đạt được band điểm mục tiêu!