IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe A Person Who Has A Positive Influence On Your Life” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề về một người có ảnh hưởng tích cực đến cuộc sống của bạn là một trong những topic xuất hiện thường xuyên nhất trong IELTS Speaking, đặc biệt ở Part 2. Đây là dạng câu hỏi yêu cầu thí sinh mô tả về con người – một chủ đề vô cùng gần gũi nhưng cũng đầy thử thách nếu bạn không biết cách khai thác sâu và sử dụng từ vựng phù hợp.

Theo thống kê từ các trung tâm luyện thi IELTS và diễn đàn như IELTS-Simon.com, ieltsliz.com, chủ đề “influential person” xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong các kỳ thi từ 2020 đến nay, và khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai vẫn ở mức Cao. Điều này đòi hỏi thí sinh cần chuẩn bị kỹ lưỡng, không chỉ về nội dung mà còn về cách diễn đạt tự nhiên, mạch lạc.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được:

  • Các câu hỏi thường gặp trong cả 3 Part của IELTS Speaking liên quan đến chủ đề này
  • Bài mẫu chi tiết theo nhiều band điểm (6-7, 7.5-8, 8.5-9) với phân tích từng tiêu chí chấm
  • Từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm giúp bạn nâng band score
  • Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của một IELTS Examiner
  • Những lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking thường kéo dài 4-5 phút, với các câu hỏi ngắn gọn về đời sống hàng ngày, sở thích, công việc, gia đình. Đây là phần “warm-up” giúp bạn làm quen với examiner và bầu không khí thi.

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

  • Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi ngay trong câu đầu tiên
  • Mở rộng ý với 2-3 câu bổ sung (lý do, ví dụ, chi tiết)
  • Giữ câu trả lời tự nhiên, không quá dài dòng (khoảng 20-30 giây/câu)

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

  • Trả lời quá ngắn kiểu “Yes/No” hoặc “I like it” mà không giải thích
  • Dùng từ vựng quá đơn giản, lặp đi lặp lại
  • Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
  • Học thuộc template nghe máy móc, không tự nhiên

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Who do you spend most of your time with?

Question 2: Do you think it’s important to have role models in life?

Question 3: What qualities do you admire most in other people?

Question 4: Has anyone in your family influenced you significantly?

Question 5: Do you prefer spending time with family or friends?

Question 6: Who was your favorite teacher at school?

Question 7: Do you think parents have the biggest influence on children?

Question 8: Have you ever changed your behavior because of someone’s advice?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Who do you spend most of your time with?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

  • Trả lời trực tiếp người bạn dành nhiều thời gian nhất
  • Giải thích tại sao (cùng sống, cùng làm, sở thích chung…)
  • Thêm chi tiết về những gì các bạn thường làm cùng nhau

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I spend most of my time with my best friend, Nam. We’ve known each other since high school and we share similar interests like playing video games and watching movies. We usually hang out on weekends.

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh: Trả lời đúng trọng tâm, có đưa ra lý do (similar interests) và ví dụ cụ thể (playing video games, watching movies)
  • Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (spend time, hang out, similar interests), thiếu sự phát triển ý sâu hơn
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời adequate và clear nhưng chưa có từ vựng nâng cao hay cấu trúc ngữ pháp phức tạp. Fluency tốt nhưng thiếu sophistication.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’d say I spend the bulk of my time with my younger sister, as we’re currently flatmates in the city. We’ve always been incredibly close, and even though we have different schedules, we make it a point to have dinner together most evenings. It’s during these meals that we catch up on each other’s day and share our thoughts about everything from work stress to future plans. Having her around has been tremendously comforting, especially since we’re both away from our parents.

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh:
    • Vocabulary nâng cao: “bulk of my time”, “flatmates”, “incredibly close”, “catch up on”, “tremendously comforting”
    • Cấu trúc phức tạp: “even though we have different schedules”, “make it a point to…”
    • Chi tiết cụ thể và personal: đề cập đến dinner routine, work stress, away from parents
    • Natural discourse markers: “I’d say”, “It’s during these meals that…”
  • Tại sao Band 8-9:
    • Fluency: Trôi chảy, không hesitation, các ý nối tiếp logic
    • Vocabulary: Precise và sophisticated với collocations tự nhiên
    • Grammar: Sử dụng đa dạng thì, mệnh đề quan hệ, cấu trúc phức
    • Pronunciation: Assumed to be clear với natural intonation

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

  • the bulk of my time: phần lớn thời gian của tôi
  • flatmates: bạn cùng phòng/căn hộ
  • incredibly close: cực kỳ thân thiết
  • catch up on: cập nhật, kể lại những gì đã xảy ra
  • tremendously comforting: vô cùng an ủi, thoải mái

Question: What qualities do you admire most in other people?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

  • Nêu 1-2 phẩm chất cụ thể
  • Giải thích tại sao những phẩm chất này quan trọng với bạn
  • Có thể đưa ví dụ về người có phẩm chất đó

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I really admire people who are honest and hardworking. I think honesty is important because you can trust these people, and hardworking people usually achieve their goals. My father is like this, and I respect him a lot.

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh: Clear và relevant, có đưa ra lý do và ví dụ cá nhân
  • Hạn chế: Từ vựng basic (honest, hardworking, trust, achieve goals), cấu trúc câu đơn giản
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Đáp ứng yêu cầu câu hỏi nhưng thiếu depth và sophistication trong cách diễn đạt

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’m particularly drawn to people who demonstrate resilience and authenticity. In my view, resilience – the ability to bounce back from setbacks – is crucial in today’s fast-paced world where challenges are inevitable. Equally important is authenticity, which means staying true to one’s values rather than conforming to others’ expectations. I find that people who possess these qualities tend to be more grounded and inspiring to be around. For instance, my former manager embodied both traits – she never sugar-coated difficulties but always maintained a positive outlook, which really resonated with me.

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh:
    • Vocabulary sophisticated: “drawn to”, “resilience”, “authenticity”, “bounce back from setbacks”, “conforming to”, “grounded”, “embodied”, “sugar-coated”, “resonated with”
    • Grammar complex: “which means staying…”, “people who possess”, “she never sugar-coated… but always maintained”
    • Ideas well-developed với explanation và example cụ thể
    • Natural flow với discourse markers: “In my view”, “Equally important”, “For instance”
  • Tại sào Band 8-9:
    • Fluency: Highly coherent với sophisticated linking
    • Vocabulary: Wide range và precise usage
    • Grammar: Complex structures used accurately
    • Ideas: Thoughtful và well-explained

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

  • be drawn to: bị thu hút bởi
  • resilience: sự kiên cường, khả năng phục hồi
  • authenticity: tính chân thực
  • bounce back from setbacks: vượt qua thất bại
  • conform to: tuân theo, chiều theo
  • grounded: thực tế, có chân trong đất
  • embody: thể hiện, là hiện thân của
  • sugar-coat: nói cho dễ nghe, che đậy sự thật
  • resonate with someone: gây ấn tượng sâu sắc, làm ai đó cảm nhận được

Question: Do you think parents have the biggest influence on children?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

  • Đưa ra opinion rõ ràng (agree/partly agree)
  • Giải thích lý do với 1-2 points
  • Balance view nếu có thể (acknowledge other influences)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think parents have the biggest influence on children. They spend the most time with children when they are young and teach them many important things like how to behave and what is right or wrong. Teachers and friends also influence children, but I believe parents are the most important.

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh: Clear opinion, có reasoning logic, acknowledge alternatives
  • Hạn chế: Vocabulary basic, ideas khá general và predictable
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response với basic reasoning nhưng thiếu sophistication và depth

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’d say parents typically have the most profound influence, particularly during a child’s formative years. This is because children naturally look up to their parents as primary role models and internalize their values and behaviors through daily observation. However, I think it’s important to acknowledge that influence is multifaceted – as children grow older, peers, teachers, and media also play increasingly significant roles in shaping their worldview. In today’s digital age, social media influencers might even rival parental influence among teenagers. So while I believe parents lay the foundation, the overall influence on a child is really a combination of various factors.

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh:
    • Balanced view: recognize parents’ importance but acknowledge other factors
    • Sophisticated vocabulary: “profound influence”, “formative years”, “internalize”, “multifaceted”, “shaping worldview”, “rival”, “lay the foundation”
    • Complex ideas: mention age differences, digital age context
    • Natural discourse: “I’d say”, “However”, “So while…”
  • Tại sao Band 8-9:
    • Fluency: Smooth progression of ideas với excellent coherence
    • Vocabulary: Wide range và used precisely
    • Grammar: Mix of complex structures
    • Critical Thinking: Shows nuanced understanding của topic

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

  • profound influence: ảnh hưởng sâu sắc
  • formative years: những năm hình thành tính cách
  • look up to: ngưỡng mộ, coi trọng
  • internalize: tiếp thu, nội hóa
  • multifaceted: nhiều khía cạnh
  • shape someone’s worldview: hình thành thế giới quan của ai đó
  • rival: sánh ngang, cạnh tranh
  • lay the foundation: đặt nền móng

Học viên IELTS đang trả lời câu hỏi về người có ảnh hưởng tích cực trong Part 1Học viên IELTS đang trả lời câu hỏi về người có ảnh hưởng tích cực trong Part 1

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần thử thách nhất của IELTS Speaking với yêu cầu độc thoại 2-3 phút liên tục. Đây là phần examiner đánh giá toàn diện nhất về khả năng fluency, vocabulary range, grammatical structures và pronunciation của bạn.

Thời gian chuẩn bị: 1 phút (sử dụng hiệu quả!)
Thời gian nói: 2-3 phút không bị ngắt

Chiến lược quan trọng:

  • Trong 1 phút chuẩn bị: Ghi chú keywords cho mỗi bullet point, KHÔNG viết câu đầy đủ. Lên outline nhanh theo structure: Who → When/Where → What they did → Why influential
  • Nói đủ 2 phút: Đây là minimum requirement. Nếu nói dưới 1.5 phút, bạn sẽ mất điểm Fluency nghiêm trọng
  • Cover tất cả bullet points: Examiner sẽ đánh dấu nếu bạn bỏ sót. Bullet cuối “explain why” là phần quan trọng nhất để ghi điểm cao
  • Sử dụng thì phù hợp: Nếu kể về quá khứ dùng past tenses, nếu về hiện tại dùng present tenses

Lỗi thường gặp:

  • Viết câu đầy đủ trong 1 phút chuẩn bị rồi đọc, nghe rất unnatural
  • Nói quá nhanh để “cố gắng nói nhiều” nhưng mất điểm pronunciation
  • Bỏ qua bullet point cuối (explain) – phần ghi điểm cao nhất
  • Không biết paraphrase từ trong đề, cứ lặp lại từ gốc

Cue Card

Describe A Person Who Has A Positive Influence On Your Life

You should say:

  • Who this person is
  • How you know this person
  • What positive influence this person has on you
  • And explain why you think this person is important to you

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person (kể về con người)

Thì động từ: Có thể mix giữa past (how you met) và present (current influence), tùy vào mối quan hệ hiện tại với người đó

Bullet points phải cover:

  • Who this person is: Name/relationship/basic background (teacher, parent, friend, colleague…)
  • How you know this person: Khi nào, ở đâu gặp, trong hoàn cảnh gì
  • What positive influence: Cụ thể họ đã ảnh hưởng như thế nào – thay đổi mindset, habits, goals…
  • Why important: Đây là phần “explain” quan trọng nhất – đi sâu vào feelings, long-term impact

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần này chiếm tới 40% điểm của bài nói. Đừng chỉ nói “because they help me” mà phải elaborate về emotional connection, personal growth, lasting impact.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about my English teacher, Ms. Lan, who has had a really positive influence on my life. I first met her when I was in grade 10, about five years ago, at my high school in Hanoi.

Ms. Lan was different from other teachers. She was always enthusiastic and supportive. She didn’t just teach us grammar and vocabulary but also shared her own experiences studying abroad and working in different countries. This opened my eyes to new possibilities.

The positive influence she had on me was quite significant. Before meeting her, I wasn’t very confident in speaking English. I was afraid of making mistakes. But Ms. Lan always encouraged us to speak up and told us that making mistakes was part of learning. She created a comfortable environment where we could practice without fear of being judged. Gradually, I became more confident and my English improved a lot.

She also influenced my career choice. Listening to her stories about traveling and meeting people from different cultures made me realize that I wanted to work in an international environment. Now I’m studying international business, and I can say that she inspired me to pursue this path.

She is important to me because she not only improved my English skills but also changed my mindset. She taught me to be more confident and to see challenges as opportunities to grow. Even now, when I face difficulties, I remember her words: “Don’t be afraid to try.” I’m really grateful to have had such a wonderful teacher.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí Band Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence 6-7 Speaks at length without noticeable effort, có coherence markers (Before meeting her, Gradually, Even now) nhưng còn đơn giản. Một số pauses để suy nghĩ.
Lexical Resource 6-7 Vocabulary đủ để diễn đạt ý nhưng chưa sophisticated: enthusiastic, supportive, comfortable environment, inspired, mindset. Thiếu collocations nâng cao và idiomatic expressions.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy 6-7 Mix của simple và complex sentences. Có sử dụng relative clauses (who has had, where we could practice) và conditionals cơ bản. Một số lỗi nhỏ không ảnh hưởng hiểu nghĩa.
Pronunciation 6-7 Generally clear và understandable. Có một vài mispronunciations không nghiêm trọng. Intonation khá tự nhiên.

Điểm mạnh:

  • ✅ Cover đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
  • ✅ Có structure rõ ràng theo đề bài
  • ✅ Đưa ra examples cụ thể (afraid of making mistakes → became more confident)
  • ✅ Length đủ requirement (khoảng 1.5-2 phút)

Hạn chế:

  • ⚠️ Vocabulary còn basic và predictable (enthusiastic, supportive, inspired…)
  • ⚠️ Thiếu depth trong phần “explain why important” – có thể elaborate hơn
  • ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đủ đa dạng và phức tạp

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to tell you about my older sister, Minh, who has been an incredible source of inspiration throughout my life. We’ve obviously known each other since birth, but it was during my university years, particularly when I was struggling with my studies, that I truly began to appreciate her influence.

Minh is six years older than me, and by the time I started university, she had already established herself as a successful marketing manager. What struck me most about her wasn’t just her professional achievements, but her unwavering determination and positive outlook on life. She had faced numerous setbacks – including being made redundant during the economic downturn – yet she never let these challenges define her.

Her influence on me has been profound in several ways. First and foremost, she taught me the value of resilience. Whenever I felt overwhelmed by academic pressure or disheartened by failures, she would share her own experiences and remind me that setbacks are temporary but giving up is permanent. This mindset shift was transformative for me. I learned to view challenges not as obstacles but as opportunities for growth.

Additionally, she’s been instrumental in developing my professional mindset. She introduced me to the concept of networking and helped me understand that success isn’t just about what you know, but also about the relationships you cultivate. Thanks to her guidance, I started attending industry events and became more proactive in building meaningful connections.

What makes her particularly important to me is that her influence extends beyond practical advice. She’s shown me, through her actions, what it means to be compassionate, driven, and authentic. Các bạn cũng có thể tham khảo thêm về describe a person who has a positive influence on your life để có thêm góc nhìn về chủ đề này. She never puts on airs despite her success, and she always makes time for family. Watching her balance her career ambitions with personal relationships has taught me that true success is holistic, not just professional.

Even now, as I’m embarking on my own career, I often find myself asking, “What would Minh do?” Her influence has become ingrained in my decision-making process, and I genuinely believe I wouldn’t be the person I am today without her guidance and example.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí Band Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence 7.5-8 Speaks fluently với minimal hesitation. Excellent use of cohesive devices (First and foremost, Additionally, Even now). Ideas được develop logically và coherently.
Lexical Resource 7.5-8 Wide range of vocabulary với less common words: unwavering determination, being made redundant, profound, disheartened, transformative, instrumental in, puts on airs, holistic, ingrained in. Good use of collocations và paraphrasing.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy 7.5-8 Wide range of structures: relative clauses (who has been, what makes her), conditionals, passive voice (being made redundant), present perfect (has been). Mostly error-free.
Pronunciation 7.5-8 Clear và natural. Good control of intonation patterns. Maintains listener comprehension throughout.

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh Band 6-7 Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary enthusiastic, supportive, inspired, comfortable environment unwavering determination, profound influence, transformative, instrumental in, puts on airs, holistic
Grammar She was always enthusiastic and supportive What struck me most wasn’t just her achievements, but her unwavering determination
Ideas She encouraged us to speak and not fear mistakes Detailed explanation về mindset shift, professional development, và holistic success
Length 1.5-2 phút 2-2.5 phút với richer content

Điểm khác biệt chính:

  • Vocabulary sophisticated hơn với collocations tự nhiên
  • Grammar structures đa dạng và chính xác hơn
  • Ideas được elaborate với specific examples
  • Personal reflection sâu sắc hơn trong phần “explain why”

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to talk about my former mentor, Dr. Nguyen Thanh, who has had a profoundly transformative impact on both my personal and professional trajectory. I was fortunate enough to meet him about four years ago when I was floundering in my first job after graduation, grappling with imposter syndrome and questioning whether I’d chosen the right career path.

Dr. Thanh is a seasoned management consultant with over twenty years of experience, and our paths crossed rather serendipitously at a professional development workshop. What immediately struck me about him was his remarkable ability to blend professional expertise with genuine empathy – a rare combination that made him exceptionally approachable despite his impressive credentials. Unlike many senior professionals I’d encountered, he didn’t dispense advice from an ivory tower; instead, he had this uncanny knack for asking thought-provoking questions that helped me discover answers within myself.

The influence he’s had on me has been nothing short of life-changing, and it operates on multiple dimensions. On a practical level, he revolutionized my approach to problem-solving. I used to tackle challenges in a rather haphazard manner, but he introduced me to structured thinking frameworks that have become invaluable tools in my professional toolkit. He taught me that excellence isn’t about working harder; it’s about working smarter and being strategic about where you invest your energy.

Perhaps more significantly, Dr. Thanh has been instrumental in reshaping my entire mindset about failure and growth. I remember vividly when I botched a major presentation early in our mentorship. Rather than offering hollow reassurances, he sat me down and dissected what went wrong with surgical precision, but in a way that was constructive rather than crushing. He helped me reframe failure not as a referendum on my abilities but as invaluable feedback that accelerates learning. This perspective shift has been absolutely liberating – I now actively seek challenges that push me out of my comfort zone, whereas I used to play it safe to avoid potential embarrassment.

What truly sets him apart and makes him irreplaceable in my life is his embodiment of the values he espouses. He doesn’t just talk about work-life balance or continuous learning – he walks the walk. Despite his demanding schedule, he’s remarkably present during our conversations, never making me feel like an obligation. He’s also refreshingly honest about his own struggles and vulnerabilities, which demystifies success and makes it feel attainable rather than some distant, unassailable peak.

The ripple effects of his mentorship extend far beyond our actual interactions. I find myself mentally consulting him when facing difficult decisions, asking, “What would Dr. Thanh’s approach be?” His influence has become so deeply woven into my thought processes that it’s hard to disentangle where his guidance ends and my own judgment begins – which I suppose is the hallmark of exceptional mentorship. Nếu các bạn quan tâm đến việc phát triển các mối quan hệ có ý nghĩa, có thể tham khảo thêm describe a piece of good news you heard about someone you know well để hiểu thêm về những điều tích cực trong các mối quan hệ xung quanh.

Looking back, I realize that what makes Dr. Thanh so pivotal isn’t any single piece of advice or insight he’s shared, but rather the cumulative effect of his consistent investment in my development. He’s shown me what it means to lead with both competence and compassion, to pursue excellence without sacrificing integrity, and to measure success not just by personal achievements but by the positive impact we have on others. In essence, he’s provided me with a blueprint for the kind of professional – and person – I aspire to become.

Thí sinh IELTS đang trình bày bài nói Part 2 về người có ảnh hưởng tích cựcThí sinh IELTS đang trình bày bài nói Part 2 về người có ảnh hưởng tích cực

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí Band Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence 8.5-9 Speaks fluently và effortlessly với natural hesitations chỉ để tạo emphasis. Outstanding coherence với sophisticated discourse markers và logical progression of ideas. Develops topic fully và coherently.
Lexical Resource 8.5-9 Wide range của sophisticated vocabulary: profoundly transformative, floundering, grappling with, serendipitously, uncanny knack for, dispense advice from an ivory tower, haphazard manner, invaluable tools, botched, dissected, accelerates learning, embodiment, walks the walk, demystifies, hallmark. Natural use of idiomatic language và precise collocation.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy 8.5-9 Full range of structures với complete flexibility và accuracy: complex conditionals, cleft sentences (What truly sets him apart is…), inversion (Rather than offering…), passive constructions, mixed conditionals. Error-free throughout.
Pronunciation 8.5-9 Sustained use of pronunciation features với minimal effect on intelligibility. Effective use of stress, rhythm và intonation. Varies pace và volume for emphasis naturally.

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:

  • Zero hesitation với smooth, natural delivery
  • Sophisticated signposting: “On a practical level”, “Perhaps more significantly”, “What truly sets him apart”
  • Natural self-correction và reformulation để clarify points
  • Maintains coherence trong cả 3 phút without losing thread

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

  • Idiomatic expressions: “dispense advice from an ivory tower” (đưa lời khuyên từ vị trí cao, xa rời thực tế), “play it safe” (chơi an toàn), “walks the walk” (làm đúng những gì mình nói)
  • Sophisticated collocations: “profoundly transformative impact”, “grappling with imposter syndrome”, “uncanny knack for”, “surgical precision”
  • Academic/formal vocabulary: trajectory, serendipitously, embodiment, demystifies, unassailable, hallmark
  • Precise verb choices: floundering (lao đao), botched (làm hỏng), dissected (mổ xẻ), espouses (ủng hộ, theo đuổi)

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

  • Cleft sentences: “What immediately struck me was…”, “What truly sets him apart is…”
  • Inversion: “Rather than offering hollow reassurances, he sat me down…”
  • Complex relative clauses: “asking thought-provoking questions that helped me discover answers…”
  • Mixed tenses: Natural switching giữa past (khi kể story) và present (khi nói về current influence)
  • Conditionals: “I now actively seek challenges that push me out of my comfort zone, whereas I used to play it safe”

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:

  • Multiple layers of analysis: practical skills + mindset shift + values embodiment
  • Specific examples: botched presentation story với detailed reflection
  • Personal growth narrative: from imposter syndrome → actively seeking challenges
  • Meta-reflection: “His influence has become so deeply woven into my thought processes that it’s hard to disentangle…”
  • Philosophical depth: “measure success not just by personal achievements but by the positive impact we have on others”

Comparison với Band 7.5-8:

  • Vocabulary: Band 8-9 uses more idiomatic và less common phrases (uncanny knack for vs good at, floundering vs struggling)
  • Ideas: Band 8-9 shows deeper reflection với meta-commentary về mentorship itself
  • Structure: Band 8-9 weaves story và reflection seamlessly, không separate bullet points
  • Length: Band 8-9 sử dụng đầy đủ 3 phút với rich content, không repetition

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Sau Part 2, examiner thường hỏi 1-2 câu ngắn để transition sang Part 3:

Question 1: Do you still keep in touch with this person?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I do. We usually meet once or twice a month for coffee and talk about our lives. I always value his advice.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely. We’ve maintained regular contact – I’d say we catch up every few weeks, either over coffee or through video calls if our schedules don’t align. What’s wonderful is that our relationship has evolved from a formal mentor-mentee dynamic into something more akin to a genuine friendship. I still lean on him for guidance, but now I can also reciprocate by sharing my own insights, which makes the relationship feel more balanced and fulfilling.


Question 2: Would you like to become a person like them?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, definitely. I admire their qualities and I hope I can help and inspire other people in the future like they did for me.

Band 8-9 Answer:
That’s an interesting question. I’d say I aspire to embody certain qualities he possesses – particularly his ability to empower others while maintaining humility – but I also believe it’s important to forge my own path rather than simply emulate someone else. What I’ve learned from him is that authentic leadership comes from being true to your own values, so ironically, the best way to honor his influence is to become the best version of myself, not a carbon copy of him.

Thí sinh ghi chú chuẩn bị cho Part 2 IELTS Speaking trong 1 phútThí sinh ghi chú chuẩn bị cho Part 2 IELTS Speaking trong 1 phút

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần thử thách nhất về tư duy và ngôn ngữ. Khác với Part 1 (personal questions) và Part 2 (storytelling), Part 3 yêu cầu bạn discuss abstract ideas, analyze issues từ nhiều góc độ, và express opinions có depth.

Thời gian: 4-5 phút

Đặc điểm:

  • Câu hỏi mở rộng từ topic của Part 2 nhưng ở level trừu tượng hơn
  • Yêu cầu critical thinking: compare, analyze causes/effects, predict future, evaluate pros/cons
  • Không còn về “bạn” mà về “people in general”, “society”, “your country”

Yêu cầu:

  • Phân tích multi-dimensional (không chỉ một góc độ)
  • Đưa ra quan điểm có lý lẽ rõ ràng
  • Support bằng examples từ society, không chỉ personal experience
  • Acknowledge complexity của issues (không black-and-white thinking)

Chiến lược:

  • Mở rộng câu trả lời: 4-6 câu minimum (khoảng 40-60 giây)
  • Sử dụng discourse markers tự nhiên: “Well”, “Actually”, “I suppose”, “It’s hard to say, but…”
  • Structure: Direct answer → Reason 1 + example → Reason 2 + example → Nuance/Conclusion
  • Acknowledge other viewpoints: “While some people might argue that…, I believe…”

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

  • Trả lời quá ngắn (1-2 câu) như Part 1
  • Chỉ nói personal experience thay vì analyze broader context
  • Thiếu lý lẽ rõ ràng, nói mơ hồ
  • Vocabulary không đủ abstract/formal cho academic discussion
  • Không biết acknowledge complexity, chỉ nói một chiều

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Role Models and Social Influence


Question 1: What qualities make someone a good role model in modern society?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Qualities/Characteristics question
  • Key words: “good role model”, “modern society” (phải contextualize cho thời đại hiện tại)
  • Cách tiếp cận: Identify 2-3 key qualities → Explain why each matters → Give example/context

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think a good role model in modern society should have several important qualities. First, they should be honest and have good morals because people, especially young people, will copy their behavior. Second, they should be hardworking and successful, so others can learn from them. For example, many people admire successful businesspeople like Bill Gates because they worked hard to achieve their goals. Also, I think role models should care about social issues and try to help others. This is important in today’s world where we have many problems like poverty and climate change.

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Clear với listing qualities (First, Second, Also)
  • Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng basic (honest, good morals, hardworking, successful, care about)
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Answers the question với clear points nhưng lacks sophistication trong vocabulary và depth trong analysis. Examples có nhưng chưa develop fully.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, I’d argue that what constitutes a good role model has evolved considerably in recent years. While traditional qualities like integrity and resilience remain fundamental, I think modern role models also need to demonstrate authenticity and social consciousness.

Authenticity is crucial because we’re living in an age of curated personas and social media filters. People, particularly younger generations, are increasingly skeptical of those who present a flawless facade. They gravitate towards individuals who are willing to be vulnerable about their struggles and failures, not just showcase their successes. Take someone like Michelle Obama, for instance – her willingness to discuss her experiences with imposter syndrome and work-life balance has made her exceptionally relatable and, consequently, influential.

Equally important is social consciousness – an awareness of and commitment to broader societal issues. In an interconnected world grappling with challenges like climate change and inequality, people look up to those who leverage their influence for collective good rather than purely personal gain. Role models today need to demonstrate that success isn’t just about individual achievement but also about contributing to positive change. Tương tự, describe a moment when you felt very thankful cũng cho thấy tầm quan trọng của việc nhận ra những ảnh hưởng tích cực từ người khác trong cuộc sống.

I’d also say that adaptability has become increasingly vital. The pace of change in modern society means that rigid thinking quickly becomes obsolete. Role models who demonstrate continuous learning and the ability to pivot when circumstances change inspire others to embrace rather than fear transformation.

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Well-organized với clear topic sentences cho mỗi quality, followed by explanation và examples
  • Vocabulary: Sophisticated: evolved considerably, integrity, curated personas, skeptical of, flawless facade, gravitate towards, exceptionally relatable, leverage their influence, grappling with
  • Grammar: Complex structures: “While traditional qualities remain…”, “what constitutes…”, “an awareness of and commitment to”
  • Critical Thinking: Shows nuanced understanding của how role models have changed với modern context

💡 Key Language Features:

  • Discourse markers: “Well, I’d argue that…”, “While… remain fundamental”, “Take someone like…”, “I’d also say that…”
  • Tentative language: “I think”, “I’d argue”, “seems to be”
  • Abstract nouns: authenticity, resilience, consciousness, adaptability, transformation
  • Academic phrases: constitutes, demonstrate, consequently, increasingly

Question 2: Do you think celebrities have too much influence on young people today?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Opinion question về extent of influence (có quá mức không?)
  • Key words: “too much”, “celebrities”, “young people”, “today”
  • Cách tiếp cận: State position → Acknowledge why có influence → Discuss whether “too much” → Balance view

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think celebrities have too much influence on young people nowadays. Many young people follow celebrities on social media and try to copy their lifestyle, fashion, and behavior. This can be negative because some celebrities promote unhealthy habits like excessive shopping or unrealistic beauty standards. However, not all celebrity influence is bad. Some celebrities use their fame to raise awareness about important issues like education or environmental protection. So while celebrities do have a lot of influence, it depends on how they use it and how young people respond to it.

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Clear position → reasons → counter-argument → conclusion
  • Vocabulary: Adequate but common (follow, copy, promote, raise awareness, unhealthy habits)
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Logical structure và covers different angles nhưng lacks sophistication và depth trong analysis

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

That’s quite a loaded question, and I think the answer is more nuanced than a simple yes or no. While I acknowledge that celebrities wield considerable influence over young people, I’m not entirely convinced that it’s inherently “too much” – rather, I think the issue lies in the nature and quality of that influence.

On one hand, the unprecedented access that social media provides has certainly amplified celebrity influence to levels we’ve never seen before. Young people are now constantly bombarded with carefully curated images and messages that can shape their aspirations, self-image, and even values. The danger here isn’t just the influence itself, but that much of what’s presented is highly artificial – filtered photos, glamorized lifestyles, and often thinly veiled product endorsements masquerading as genuine recommendations. This can cultivate unrealistic expectations and, in more serious cases, contribute to issues like body dysmorphia or conspicuous consumption.

However, I think it’s overly simplistic to paint all celebrity influence with the same brush. The landscape is actually quite heterogeneous. While some celebrities do perpetuate harmful stereotypes or peddle superficial materialism, others have leveraged their platforms admirably. Consider how Emma Watson has championed gender equality or how Leonardo DiCaprio has brought climate issues to the forefront of public discourse. These individuals demonstrate that celebrity status can be a powerful vehicle for positive social change.

The crux of the matter, in my view, is media literacy and critical thinking skills. Rather than trying to diminish celebrity influence – which is probably neither possible nor entirely desirable – we should be equipping young people with the tools to critically evaluate the messages they’re consuming. Khi nói về sự ảnh hưởng tích cực, chúng ta cũng nên nhớ rằng describe a recent family tradition you celebrated có thể mang lại những giá trị bền vững hơn nhiều so với những ảnh hưởng ngắn hạn từ celebrity culture. If young people can discern between authentic advocacy and commercial manipulation, between healthy inspiration and toxic comparison, then celebrity influence becomes less of a threat and more of just another factor in their development.

So to directly answer the question: yes, celebrities have substantial influence, but whether it’s “too much” depends largely on the ecosystem within which that influence operates – including education, parental guidance, and the broader cultural conversation about what we value as a society.

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Acknowledge complexity → Discuss negative aspects với depth → Counter with positive examples → Shift to real solution (media literacy) → Nuanced conclusion
  • Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: loaded question, wield considerable influence, unprecedented access, constantly bombarded with, masquerading as, cultivate unrealistic expectations, conspicuous consumption, heterogeneous, perpetuate, peddle, championed, brought to the forefront, crux of the matter, equipping, critically evaluate, ecosystem
  • Grammar: Full range: cleft sentences (The danger here isn’t…, The crux of the matter is…), conditionals (If young people can discern…), passive (are constantly bombarded), complex nominalizations
  • Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis, acknowledges complexity, shifts perspective to real solution, avoids simple yes/no thinking

💡 Key Language Features:

  • Hedge language: “quite”, “I’m not entirely convinced”, “rather”, “largely”
  • Academic discourse: “On one hand”, “However”, “The crux of the matter”, “So to directly answer”
  • Sophisticated vocabulary: wield, amplified, nuanced, heterogeneous, leverage, ecosystem
  • Metaphorical language: “paint with the same brush”, “powerful vehicle for”

Theme 2: Influence Across Generations

Question 3: How has the way people influence each other changed over the past few decades?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Change over time (past vs present comparison)
  • Key words: “changed”, “past few decades” (cần compare traditional vs modern ways)
  • Cách tiếp cận: Identify traditional ways → Explain how they’ve changed → Give reasons for changes → Implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think the way people influence each other has changed a lot because of technology, especially the internet and social media. In the past, people were mainly influenced by family members, teachers, and local community leaders because they had direct contact with them. But now, people can be influenced by anyone around the world through social media platforms like Facebook or Instagram. Also, the speed of influence has changed. Before, it took time for ideas to spread, but now information and trends can go viral in just hours. This means both positive and negative influences can spread much faster than before.

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Clear comparison past vs present với specific points
  • Vocabulary: Adequate (direct contact, spread, go viral) nhưng thiếu precision
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses the question với clear comparison nhưng analysis lacks depth và vocabulary không sophisticated

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

The landscape of influence has undergone a seismic shift over recent decades, primarily driven by technological advancement. I’d say the changes can be analyzed through several key dimensions.

Perhaps most obviously, there’s been a dramatic democratization of influence. In previous generations, influence was largely concentrated in traditional authority figures – parents, teachers, religious leaders, and local community figures who commanded respect through proximity and recognized expertise. Today, however, influence has been radically decentralized. Anyone with a smartphone and internet connection can potentially amass a following and shape opinions on a global scale. This has upended traditional hierarchies of credibility – a teenage YouTuber might have more influence over consumer behavior than established experts.

The mechanisms of influence have also fundamentally changed. Traditional influence operated through sustained, personal relationships and face-to-face interaction, which naturally created deeper but narrower spheres of impact. Contemporary influence, by contrast, tends to be more superficial but exponentially broader. Through algorithmic amplification and network effects, a single post can cascade through millions of people in hours, something inconceivable in the pre-digital era. However, this comes with a trade-off: while reach has expanded dramatically, the depth and durability of that influence might be more fleeting. Để hiểu thêm về những ảnh hưởng tích cực từ truyền thống gia đình, bạn có thể xem describe an interesting tradition in your family để thấy cách các giá trị được truyền qua các thế hệ.

I’d also highlight the shift in the currency of influence itself. Previously, influence was largely derived from demonstrable expertise, moral authority, or institutional position. Now, relatability, authenticity, and entertainment value often carry more weight. We’ve seen the rise of micro-influencers whose power comes not from traditional credentials but from perceived genuineness and the ability to foster parasocial relationships with their audiences.

Finally, there’s been a shift from unidirectional to interactive influence. Traditional influence was largely top-down – authority figures disseminated messages that were passively received. Digital platforms have enabled more reciprocal dynamics where audiences actively participate in shaping narratives, challenging viewpoints, and co-creating influence. This has made influence simultaneously more democratic but also more fragmented and contested.

The implications are profound and double-edged. On one hand, this leveled playing field has empowered marginalized voices and enabled grassroots movements to gain traction in ways previously impossible. On the other, it’s contributed to echo chambers, the proliferation of misinformation, and a general erosion of shared truths, as influence becomes increasingly siloed and algorithm-driven.

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Exceptional organization với clear dimensions: democratization → mechanisms → currency → direction → implications
  • Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: seismic shift, democratization, concentrated in, radically decentralized, amass, upended, hierarchies of credibility, exponentially broader, cascade through, fleeting, currency of influence, parasocial relationships, unidirectional, disseminated, reciprocal dynamics, double-edged, leveled playing field, erosion of shared truths, siloed, algorithm-driven
  • Grammar: Full range of complex structures perfectly executed
  • Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis, historical perspective, discusses implications, balanced view of pros and cons

💡 Key Language Features:

  • Academic tone: “can be analyzed through several key dimensions”, “implications are profound”
  • Sophisticated transitions: “Perhaps most obviously”, “by contrast”, “I’d also highlight”, “Finally”
  • Complex nominal phrases: “hierarchies of credibility”, “currency of influence”, “proliferation of misinformation”
  • Metaphorical language: “seismic shift”, “landscape of influence”, “cascade through”, “leveled playing field”

Theme 3: Media and Technology

Question 4: What role does social media play in shaping people’s role models today?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Role/Function question
  • Key words: “social media”, “shaping”, “role models”, “today”
  • Cách tiếp cận: Describe current role → Explain mechanisms → Evaluate positive/negative aspects

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Social media plays a huge role in shaping people’s role models nowadays. Through platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, people can easily discover and follow influencers and celebrities from all over the world. Social media makes these role models seem more accessible and relatable because they share details about their daily lives. Young people especially are influenced by what they see on social media. However, this can be both good and bad. It’s good because people can find role models who share their interests and values, but it’s bad because sometimes the image presented on social media is fake or exaggerated, which can create unrealistic expectations.

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Clear với main role → mechanism → evaluation
  • Vocabulary: Common words (huge role, accessible, relatable, fake, unrealistic expectations)
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate answer covering main points nhưng lacks sophistication và detailed analysis

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Social media has become the primary conduit through which role models are discovered, cultivated, and disseminated in contemporary society, fundamentally reshaping the very concept of what it means to be a role model.

First and foremost, social media has democratized visibility in unprecedented ways. Traditionally, becoming a widely recognized role model required institutional gatekeeping – you needed to be spotlighted by traditional media, achieve conventional success, or hold formal positions of authority. Social media has circumvented these barriers, allowing individuals to build influence organically based purely on their content and ability to resonate with audiences. This has diversified the pool of available role models dramatically – we now see role models emerging from niche communities around specific interests, identities, or values that might never have gained mainstream visibility before.

The platform also facilitates a different type of connection between role models and their followers. The illusion of intimacy created through daily updates, stories, and direct interaction makes role models feel remarkably accessible, which can enhance their influence. When someone shares their morning routine, workout struggles, or career setbacks, it humanizes them in ways that traditional celebrity culture never could. This perceived authenticity – whether genuine or carefully constructed – makes their influence more potent because followers feel they’re learning from someone relatable rather than an untouchable figure on a pedestal.

However, I think it’s crucial to acknowledge the more problematic dimensions. Social media’s role in shaping role models is inextricably tied to its algorithmic architecture and economic model. Platforms prioritize engagement, which means content that triggers strong emotional responses – whether inspiration or outrage – gets amplified disproportionately. This can skew which types of role models gain prominence, often favoring those who are visually appealing, controversial, or adept at self-promotion over those who might have more substantive qualities but less performative charisma.

Moreover, there’s the issue of manufactured authenticity. The same tools that allow genuine connection also enable carefully curated personas that bear little resemblance to reality. Many supposed role models are essentially brand constructions, promoting lifestyles that are financially unattainable for most followers while obscuring the commercial motivations behind their content. Việc hiểu rõ về describe a place you visited that exceeded your expectations cũng cho thấy tầm quan trọng của trải nghiệm thực tế so với những hình ảnh được tô vẽ trên mạng xã hội. This creates what I’d call “aspirational toxicity” – where the very role models meant to inspire actually foster inadequacy and consumerist values.

There’s also a temporal dimension worth considering. Social media’s fast-paced nature means role models can rise and fall with remarkable velocity. Someone can be widely admired one week and cancelled the next based on a single misstep. This volatility arguably makes role models less stable sources of guidance than traditional figures whose influence was built and tested over longer periods.

In essence, social media’s role is paradoxical: it has broadened access to diverse role models and created more authentic-feeling connections, but it has also commodified influence, prioritized superficial engagement over substantive impact, and blurred the line between genuine inspiration and commercial manipulation. The challenge for individuals is navigating this complex landscape with discernment, recognizing that the role models algorithmically served to them may not necessarily be those most worth emulating.

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Outstanding multi-layered analysis: democratization → type of connection → problematic aspects (algorithm + manufactured authenticity + temporal dimension) → synthesis
  • Vocabulary: Exceptional: primary conduit, cultivated, disseminated, circumvented, resonate with, diversified the pool, illusion of intimacy, inextricably tied to, skew, adept at, curated personas, aspirational toxicity, foster inadequacy, temporal dimension, volatility, paradoxical, commodified
  • Grammar: Sophisticated structures throughout including nominalization, cleft sentences, passive voice used strategically
  • Critical Thinking: Exceptionally nuanced với multiple perspectives, introduces original concepts (aspirational toxicity), balanced analysis

💡 Key Language Features:

  • Academic discourse: “First and foremost”, “However, I think it’s crucial to”, “Moreover”, “In essence”
  • Sophisticated analysis: “paradoxical”, “inextricably tied to”, “temporal dimension”
  • Precise vocabulary: conduit, circumvented, skew, volatility, discernment
  • Metaphorical language: “untouchable figure on a pedestal”, “algorithmic architecture”

Theme 4: Cultural and Educational Influence

Question 5: Should schools do more to teach students about choosing positive role models?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Should question (opinion về education policy)
  • Key words: “schools”, “teach”, “choosing positive role models”
  • Cách tiếp cận: State position → Give reasons why it’s needed/not needed → Discuss how it could be implemented → Potential challenges

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think schools should definitely teach students about choosing positive role models. Young people today are exposed to many different influences, especially through social media, and they might not always be able to tell which role models are good for them. Schools could help by teaching students to think critically about the people they admire and to look for role models who have good values and achievements. This could be done through special lessons or discussions in class. However, it might be challenging because different families have different values, and some parents might not agree with what the school teaches about role models.

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Clear position → reasons → implementation → challenge
  • Vocabulary: Adequate (think critically, good values, achievements, challenging)
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Logical structure và covers các aspects chính nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated expression

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’m strongly inclined to say yes, though I think the approach needs to be carefully calibrated to be effective. The question isn’t really whether schools should play a role in this area, but rather how they can do so in ways that are both pedagogically sound and respectful of diverse perspectives.

The rationale for school involvement seems compelling to me. Young people today navigate an unprecedented deluge of potential influences, many of which are algorithmically curated to maximize engagement rather than promote genuine wellbeing or development. Without explicit guidance in critical evaluation, students may default to superficial criteria when choosing role models – popularity, physical appearance, wealth – rather than considering qualities like integrity, resilience, or contribution to society. Schools, as institutions explicitly tasked with fostering holistic development, are well-positioned to provide this scaffolding.

However, the implementation matters enormously. I don’t think this should be approached prescriptively – that is, schools shouldn’t be dictating who students should or shouldn’t admire, which would likely backfire and feel patronizing. Rather, the focus should be on cultivating critical thinking skills and providing frameworks for evaluation. Students could be taught to ask questions like: What values does this person embody? What’s the basis of their influence? What are they known for beyond their image? Are their achievements replicable, or do they depend on exceptional circumstances or resources? What trade-offs have they made to achieve their position?

This kind of media literacy education could be woven into existing curricula quite naturally. English or Media Studies classes could analyze how public figures are constructed and presented. Social Studies could examine historical role models and discuss what makes their influence endure. Even Science classes could spotlight role models from diverse backgrounds who’ve made contributions to their fields, normalizing achievement across different identities.

That said, I acknowledge the inherent tensions here. There’s a fine line between education and indoctrination, and role model selection often intersects with values that may vary across families and communities. Schools would need to be mindful of this cultural sensitivity and frame discussions in ways that respect pluralism rather than impose singular narratives. The goal should be empowering students to make informed choices aligned with their own values, not molding them toward predetermined ideals.

There’s also the practical challenge of equipping educators themselves with the skills to facilitate these conversations. Teachers would need professional development to handle nuanced discussions about influence, identity, and values – particularly given how these topics can venture into controversial territory.

On balance, though, I believe the benefits outweigh the challenges. In an era where influence is so democratized yet often so opaque in its motivations, equipping young people with analytical tools to evaluate who they look up to isn’t just beneficial – it’s arguably essential to their development as discerning, autonomous individuals. The key is approaching it not as prescriptive moralism but as practical life skill education – teaching students how to think about role models, not what to think about them.

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Exceptional với clear position → rationale → implementation approach → potential challenges → balancing considerations → conclusion
  • Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: calibrated, pedagogically sound, unprecedented deluge, algorithmically curated, scaffolding, approached prescriptively, backfire, feel patronizing, woven into, inherent tensions, intersects with, cultural sensitivity, respect pluralism, impose singular narratives, venture into controversial territory, outweigh, opaque, discerning, autonomous, prescriptive moralism
  • Grammar: Full range perfectly executed với varied sentence structures
  • Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis acknowledging complexity, practical considerations, potential pitfalls, balanced conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

  • Nuanced expression: “strongly inclined to say yes, though…”, “not really whether… but rather how”
  • Academic hedging: “seems compelling”, “arguably essential”
  • Sophisticated discourse: “The rationale for… seems compelling”, “That said”, “On balance”
  • Complex nominalization: “implementation matters enormously”, “cultivation of critical thinking”

Examiner và thí sinh trao đổi sâu trong Part 3 IELTS SpeakingExaminer và thí sinh trao đổi sâu trong Part 3 IELTS Speaking

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ Loại từ Phiên âm Nghĩa tiếng Việt Ví dụ Collocation
profound influence noun phrase /prəˈfaʊnd ˈɪnfluəns/ ảnh hưởng sâu sắc She had a profound influence on my career choices. have/exert/exercise a profound influence
role model noun /ˈrəʊl ˌmɒdl/ hình mẫu, tấm gương My mother has always been my role model. positive/negative role model, serve as a role model
mentorship noun /ˈmentɔːʃɪp/ sự cố vấn, hướng dẫn His mentorship helped me navigate difficult career decisions. provide/offer mentorship, benefit from mentorship
look up to phrasal verb /lʊk ʌp tuː/ ngưỡng mộ, kính trọng Children naturally look up to their parents. look up to someone as…, look up to someone for…
shape someone’s worldview verb phrase /ʃeɪp wɜːldvjuː/ hình thành thế giới quan của ai đó Travel experiences shaped my worldview significantly. fundamentally/profoundly shape worldview
inspirational adj /ˌɪnspəˈreɪʃənl/ truyền cảm hứng Her story was truly inspirational. highly/deeply/truly inspirational
unwavering determination noun phrase /ʌnˈweɪvərɪŋ dɪˌtɜːmɪˈneɪʃn/ sự quyết tâm không lay chuyển His unwavering determination helped him overcome obstacles. show/demonstrate unwavering determination
formative years noun phrase /ˈfɔːmətɪv jɪəz/ những năm hình thành tính cách The formative years of childhood are crucial. during one’s formative years, in the formative years
internalize verb /ɪnˈtɜːnəlaɪz/ nội hóa, tiếp thu vào bản thân Children internalize the values they observe. internalize values/beliefs/attitudes
emulate verb /ˈemjuleɪt/ noi theo, bắt chước Young athletes emulate their sporting heroes. seek to/strive to emulate, emulate success
resilience noun /rɪˈzɪliəns/ sự kiên cường, khả năng phục hồi Building resilience is essential for overcoming challenges. build/develop resilience, show/demonstrate resilience
authenticity noun /ˌɔːθenˈtɪsəti/ tính chân thực People value authenticity over perfection nowadays. lack/possess authenticity, project authenticity
embody verb /ɪmˈbɒdi/ thể hiện, là hiện thân của She embodies the qualities of a great leader. fully/perfectly embody, embody values/principles
leverage influence verb phrase /ˈlevərɪdʒ ˈɪnfluəns/ tận dụng ảnh hưởng Celebrities should leverage their influence for social good. leverage influence to…, effectively leverage influence
gravitate towards phrasal verb /ˈɡrævɪteɪt təˈwɔːdz/ bị hút về, có xu hướng theo People naturally gravitate towards confident individuals. gravitate towards someone/something
transformative impact noun phrase /trænsˈfɔːmətɪv ˈɪmpækt/ tác động làm thay đổi The experience had a transformative impact on my life. have/exert a transformative impact
instrumental in adj phrase /ˌɪnstrəˈmentl ɪn/ đóng vai trò quan trọng trong She was instrumental in my personal development. be instrumental in doing something
cultivate verb /ˈkʌltɪveɪt/ nuôi dưỡng, phát triển We should cultivate positive relationships. cultivate skills/relationships/habits
foster verb /ˈfɒstə/ thúc đẩy, nuôi dưỡng Good role models foster confidence in others. foster development/growth/understanding
multifaceted adj /ˌmʌltiˈfæsɪtɪd/ nhiều khía cạnh Influence is a multifaceted phenomenon. multifaceted approach/issue/nature

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ Nghĩa Ví dụ sử dụng Band điểm
a guiding light người chỉ đường, nguồn cảm hứng dẫn dắt My grandfather was a guiding light during difficult times. 7.5-9
walk the walk làm đúng những gì mình nói True role models don’t just talk the talk; they walk the walk. 7.5-9
put someone on a pedestal đặt ai đó lên bệ cao We shouldn’t put celebrities on a pedestal and forget they’re human. 7-8.5
under someone’s wing dưới sự bảo trợ, chăm sóc của ai I learned so much while working under her wing. 7-8.5
pave the way for mở đường cho Her achievements paved the way for future generations. 7.5-9
lead by example nêu gương bằng hành động The best leaders lead by example rather than just giving orders. 7-8.5
a breath of fresh air điều gì mới mẻ, tích cực Her innovative approach was a breath of fresh air in the industry. 7-8
see eye to eye with đồng tình, có cùng quan điểm I don’t always see eye to eye with my parents, but I respect their views. 7-8
take someone under one’s wing nhận ai đó vào bảo trợ, dìu dắt My manager took me under her wing when I first started. 7-8.5
in someone’s footsteps theo bước chân của ai Many children follow in their parents’ footsteps career-wise. 7-8
the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree con nhà tông không giống lông cũng giống cánh He’s just as entrepreneurial as his father – the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. 8-9
cut from the same cloth cùng kiểu, giống nhau They’re cut from the same cloth – both passionate about social justice. 7.5-8.5
dispense advice from an ivory tower đưa lời khuyên từ vị trí cao, xa rời thực tế Good mentors don’t dispense advice from an ivory tower; they understand real struggles. 8-9
make waves tạo ra tác động lớn, gây tiếng vang Her research made waves in the scientific community. 7.5-8.5
set the bar high đặt ra tiêu chuẩn cao My teacher set the bar high, which pushed us to excel. 7-8
bring out the best in someone giúp ai đó phát huy tốt nhất Great mentors bring out the best in their mentees. 7-8.5

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

  • 📝 Well,… – Khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ ngắn
  • 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc điều chỉnh
  • 📝 To be honest/frank,… – Khi nói thật lòng
  • 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm
  • 📝 From my perspective/point of view,… – Từ góc nhìn của tôi
  • 📝 The way I see it,… – Theo cách tôi nhìn nhận

Để bổ sung ý:

  • 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó
  • 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa
  • 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
  • 📝 Besides that/In addition to that,… – Ngoài ra
  • 📝 Another thing worth mentioning is… – Một điều khác đáng nói là

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

  • 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác…
  • 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là…, chúng ta cũng cần xem xét…
  • 📝 That said/Having said that,… – Tuy nhiên, đã nói vậy…
  • 📝 At the same time,… – Đồng thời

Để đưa ra ví dụ:

  • 📝 For instance/For example,… – Ví dụ
  • 📝 Take… for instance/example – Lấy… làm ví dụ
  • 📝 A case in point is… – Một trường hợp điển hình là
  • 📝 To illustrate this point,… – Để minh họa điểm này

Để kết luận:

  • 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại
  • 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì
  • 📝 In essence/Essentially,… – Về bản chất
  • 📝 The bottom line is… – Điểm mấu chốt là
  • 📝 On balance,… – Cân nhắc mọi mặt

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional (Type 2 + 3):

  • Formula: If + Past Perfect, would/could + infinitive
  • Ví dụ: “If my teacher hadn’t encouraged me back then, I wouldn’t have the confidence I do today.”

Inversion for emphasis:

  • Formula: Had + subject + past participle, would have…
  • Ví dụ: “Had I not met this influential person, my life trajectory would have been completely different.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

  • Formula: , which/who + verb
  • Ví dụ: “My mentor, who had over 20 years of experience, taught me invaluable lessons about leadership.”

Reduced relative clauses:

  • Formula: Noun + present/past participle
  • Ví dụ: “The values instilled by my parents have shaped who I am today.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive:

  • Formula: It is thought/believed/said that…
  • Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that parental influence is strongest during childhood.”

Passive with modals:

  • Formula: can/should/must + be + past participle
  • Ví dụ: “Role models should be chosen carefully based on their values, not just their success.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What-cleft:

  • Formula: What + subject + verb + is/was…
  • Ví dụ: “What I admire most about her is her resilience in the face of adversity.”

It-cleft:

  • Formula: It + is/was + focus + that/who…
  • Ví dụ: “It was my grandfather who taught me the importance of integrity.”

5. Inversion for Emphasis:

  • Formula: Not only + auxiliary + subject + verb, but also…
  • Ví dụ: “Not only did she inspire me academically, but she also taught me valuable life lessons.”

6. Participle Clauses:

  • Formula: Present/Past participle at beginning
  • Ví dụ: “Having witnessed her determination firsthand, I learned the true meaning of perseverance.”

7. Emphatic Structures:

  • Formula: It is/was… that…
  • Ví dụ: “It is through her guidance that I discovered my true potential.”

Chiến Lược Đạt Điểm Cao Từ Góc Nhìn Examiner

Những Điều Examiners Đánh Giá Cao

1. Natural Delivery (Sự tự nhiên)

  • Nói như đang conversation, không recite thuộc lòng
  • Có self-correction tự nhiên: “I mean…”, “or rather…”
  • Sử dụng fillers hợp lý: “Well”, “Let me think”, “You know”

2. Depth of Content (Chiều sâu nội dung)

  • Không chỉ “what” mà còn “why” và “how”
  • Personal reflection và critical thinking
  • Specific examples thay vì general statements

3. Vocabulary Precision (Độ chính xác từ vựng)

  • Dùng từ precise thay vì vague: “profound” thay vì “very big”
  • Collocations tự nhiên: “exert influence” không phải “give influence”
  • Paraphrasing thay vì lặp từ

4. Grammatical Flexibility (Linh hoạt ngữ pháp)

  • Mix nhiều structures trong một câu trả lời
  • Không sai ngữ pháp cơ bản (subject-verb agreement, tenses)
  • Complex structures được dùng naturally, không forced

Lỗi Phổ Biến Cần Tránh

Học thuộc template và áp dụng máy móc

  • Nghe unnatural và repetitive
  • Examiner nhận ra ngay và có thể downgrade band

Thay vào đó: Học structures nhưng flexible adapt theo context


Nói quá nhanh để “thể hiện fluency”

  • Dẫn đến pronunciation errors
  • Mất điểm cả Fluency lẫn Pronunciation

Thay vào đó: Nói với pace comfortable, rõ ràng, có natural pauses


Sử dụng từ vựng academic quá mức không phù hợp

  • “utilize” thay vì “use” trong mọi context
  • Nghe stiff và unnatural

Thay vào đó: Balance giữa conversational và sophisticated language


Trả lời quá ngắn hoặc quá dài

  • Part 1: Quá 30 giây examiner sẽ ngắt
  • Part 2: Dưới 1.5 phút mất điểm nghiêm trọng
  • Part 3: Dưới 30 giây hoặc quá 1.5 phút đều không tốt

Thay vào đó: Practice timing với stopwatch


Không trả lời đúng câu hỏi

  • Nói về topic liên quan nhưng không address exact question
  • Bỏ sót bullet points trong Part 2

Thay vào đó: Pause để hiểu câu hỏi, không sợ yêu cầu clarification


Thiếu examples cụ thể

  • Chỉ nói general statements
  • “People think…”, “It is important…” mà không có specifics

Thay vào đó: Luôn có at least 1 specific example cho mỗi point

Tips Thực Chiến Từ Examiner

Cho Part 1:

  1. Direct answer trong câu đầu tiên
  2. Extend với 2-3 câu: reason + example
  3. Không overthink – đây là warm-up

Cho Part 2:

  1. Dùng hết 1 phút preparation – ghi keywords cho mỗi bullet
  2. Speak for full 2 minutes minimum
  3. Structure: Introduction → Body (cover all bullets) → Brief conclusion
  4. Phần “explain why” quan trọng nhất – dành 40% thời gian

Cho Part 3:

  1. Acknowledge complexity: “That’s an interesting question…”, “It’s hard to say definitively…”
  2. Multi-dimensional answers: “On one hand… On the other hand…”
  3. Support với societal examples, không chỉ personal
  4. Show critical thinking: “However, we need to consider…”, “The issue is more nuanced…”

Lộ Trình Luyện Tập Hiệu Quả

Giai đoạn 1: Foundation (2-4 tuần)

  • Làm quen với format và timing của cả 3 Parts
  • Build vocabulary bank cho common topics
  • Practice pronunciation với shadowing technique
  • Record và listen back để identify issues

Giai đoạn 2: Development (4-6 tuần)

  • Practice với real IELTS questions
  • Focus vào extending answers với reasons + examples
  • Học structures và practice paraphrasing
  • Mock tests với timing chính xác

Giai đoạn 3: Refinement (2-4 tuần trước thi)

  • Polish pronunciation và intonation
  • Practice với speaking partner hoặc tutor
  • Review và internalize vocabulary
  • Work on natural delivery và confidence

Mỗi ngày:

  • 15 phút: Vocabulary review
  • 20 phút: Practice answering questions (record yourself)
  • 10 phút: Listen back và note improvements
  • 15 phút: Shadowing native speakers

Tổng Kết

Chủ đề “Describe a person who has a positive influence on your life” là một trong những topic phổ biến và quan trọng nhất trong IELTS Speaking. Để đạt band điểm cao, bạn cần:

Chuẩn bị kỹ lưỡng: Có sẵn ideas cho cả 3 Parts, không chỉ Part 2

Vocabulary đa dạng: Từ basic đến advanced, với natural collocations

Grammar linh hoạt: Mix nhiều structures naturally

Ideas có depth: Không chỉ mô tả mà phân tích, reflect

Delivery tự nhiên: Như conversation, không như reading script

Examples cụ thể: Personal stories cho Part 2, societal examples cho Part 3

Time management: Part 1 (20-30s/câu), Part 2 (2-3 phút), Part 3 (40-60s/câu)

Nhớ rằng, IELTS Speaking đánh giá khả năng communication trong real-life situations. Examiner muốn nghe bạn nói tự nhiên, có critical thinking, và demonstrate English proficiency – không phải recite thuộc lòng. Practice regularly, record yourself, và luôn seek feedback để improve.

Chúc bạn đạt band điểm mong muốn trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking!

Previous Article

IELTS Writing Task 2: Vai Trò Của Thuế Trong Phát Triển Kinh Tế – Bài Mẫu Band 5-9 & Phân Tích Chi Tiết

Next Article

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời "Describe a Situation When You Were Very Happy" - Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Write a Comment

Leave a Comment

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *

Đăng ký nhận thông tin bài mẫu

Để lại địa chỉ email của bạn, chúng tôi sẽ thông báo tới bạn khi có bài mẫu mới được biên tập và xuất bản thành công.
Chúng tôi cam kết không spam email ✨