Trong hành trình chinh phục IELTS Speaking, việc miêu tả một người có tài năng đặc biệt là một trong những chủ đề phổ biến và hấp dẫn nhất. Chủ đề “Describe A Person Who Has A Special Talent” không chỉ xuất hiện thường xuyên trong các kỳ thi IELTS thực tế từ năm 2020 đến nay, mà còn mang tính ứng dụng cao vì nó cho phép bạn thể hiện khả năng miêu tả người, kể chuyện và phân tích sâu sắc.
Theo thống kê từ các đề thi thực tế được chia sẻ trên IELTS-Blog và IELTSLiz, chủ đề về “talent” và “skilled people” xuất hiện với tần suất cao (khoảng 15-20% các kỳ thi), đặc biệt phổ biến ở khu vực Châu Á. Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai vẫn ở mức cao do tính universal và linh hoạt của chủ đề này.
Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được:
- Các câu hỏi thường gặp và cách xử lý hiệu quả trong cả 3 Part của IELTS Speaking
- Bài mẫu chi tiết theo từng band điểm (6-7, 7.5-8, 8.5-9) với phân tích chuyên sâu
- Kho từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm liên quan đến tài năng, kỹ năng và thành tựu
- Chiến lược trả lời từ góc nhìn của một Examiner chính thức
- Lời khuyên thực tế giúp tránh những lỗi phổ biến của học viên Việt Nam
IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview
Tổng Quan Về Part 1
Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về cuộc sống hàng ngày, sở thích và kinh nghiệm cá nhân. Đây là phần “warm-up” giúp bạn làm quen với examiner và tạo ấn tượng ban đầu.
Chiến lược quan trọng: Mỗi câu trả lời nên kéo dài 2-3 câu, bao gồm direct answer, explanation và example. Tránh trả lời quá ngắn kiểu “Yes, I do” hoặc quá dài lòng vòng mất tự nhiên.
Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:
- Trả lời chỉ một câu ngắn, không mở rộng ý
- Dùng từ vựng quá đơn giản (good, nice, interesting) lặp đi lặp lại
- Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
- Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm do lo lắng
- Không tự nhiên, nghe như đang đọc thuộc
Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp
Question 1: Do you have any special talents or skills?
Question 2: What talents do you admire in other people?
Question 3: Do you think everyone has a special talent?
Question 4: Did you learn any special skills when you were a child?
Question 5: What kind of talents are valued in your country?
Question 6: Would you like to develop a new talent in the future?
Question 7: Do you think talent is more important than hard work?
Question 8: Have you ever tried to learn a difficult skill?
Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết
Question: Do you have any special talents or skills?
🎯 Cách tiếp cận:
- Trả lời trực tiếp có hay không
- Giải thích talent đó là gì và bạn phát triển nó như thế nào
- Thêm một câu về tại sao bạn thích nó hoặc nó giúp ích gì
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“I think I’m quite good at drawing. I started learning it when I was young and I practice regularly. It helps me relax after work and I enjoy creating beautiful pictures.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh: Trả lời rõ ràng, có cấu trúc cơ bản (talent → how → benefit)
- Hạn chế: Từ vựng đơn giản (good at, beautiful), thiếu detail cụ thể, grammar chưa đa dạng
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Fluent nhưng chưa sophisticated, vocabulary adequate nhưng không impressive, ideas basic
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“I’d say I have a knack for playing the piano. I’ve been honing this skill since I was seven, and over the years, I’ve developed quite a repertoire of classical pieces. What I find most rewarding about it is the way music allows me to express emotions that words simply can’t capture.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh:
- Vocabulary tinh tế: “have a knack for” (thay vì “good at”), “honing this skill” (thay vì “practicing”)
- Grammar phức tạp: relative clause “that words simply can’t capture”
- Ideas sâu sắc: kết nối piano với emotional expression
- Natural discourse: “I’d say” tạo sự tự nhiên
- Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates flexibility, uses less common vocabulary naturally, shows depth of thought
💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:
- have a knack for (something): có khiếu, có tài về cái gì
- hone a skill: rèn luyện, mài giũa kỹ năng
- repertoire: vốn tiết mục, danh mục các tác phẩm
- express emotions: thể hiện cảm xúc
Question: What talents do you admire in other people?
🎯 Cách tiếp cận:
- Chọn một loại talent cụ thể
- Giải thích tại sao bạn admire nó
- Có thể đưa ra example về một người có talent đó
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“I really admire people who can speak many languages. It’s very useful because they can communicate with people from different countries. I wish I could speak more languages like them.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh: Clear answer, có reason (useful for communication)
- Hạn chế: Vocabulary repetitive (people, languages), idea chưa develop, thiếu depth
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates effectively nhưng lacks sophistication
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“I’m absolutely fascinated by people who are gifted linguists. There’s something remarkable about the ability to switch between languages effortlessly and absorb different cultures through their native tongues. I think it takes not just intelligence but also cultural sensitivity and dedication to master multiple languages at that level.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh:
- Vocabulary range: “fascinated by”, “gifted linguists”, “switch effortlessly”
- Complex ideas: liên kết language với culture và personal qualities
- Grammar variety: “not just…but also” structure
- Natural expression: “There’s something remarkable about…”
- Tại sao Band 8-9: Shows ability to discuss abstract ideas, uses precise vocabulary, demonstrates critical thinking
💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:
- be fascinated by: bị cuốn hút, mê mẩn bởi
- gifted linguist: người có tài về ngôn ngữ
- switch between languages effortlessly: chuyển đổi giữa các ngôn ngữ một cách dễ dàng
- cultural sensitivity: sự nhạy bén về văn hóa
Question: Do you think talent is more important than hard work?
🎯 Cách tiếp cận:
- Đây là opinion question, nên đưa ra quan điểm rõ ràng
- Balance câu trả lời bằng cách acknowledge cả hai yếu tố
- Đưa ra lý do và example để support
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“I think both are important. Some people have natural talent but they still need to practice. Hard work can help people improve their skills even if they don’t have much talent at first.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh: Balanced view, acknowledge cả talent và effort
- Hạn chế: Ideas basic và predictable, thiếu example cụ thể, vocabulary đơn giản
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate communication nhưng lacks depth và sophistication
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“That’s an interesting question. From my perspective, while innate talent certainly gives people a head start, I’d argue that consistent effort is what truly determines success. You see countless examples of naturally gifted individuals who never reach their potential because they rely solely on their abilities, whereas people with modest talents but unwavering dedication often surpass them. I think the sweet spot is when talent and hard work converge.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh:
- Opening strategy: “That’s an interesting question” – natural discourse marker
- Complex argument structure: acknowledge talent → emphasize effort → examples → synthesis
- Sophisticated vocabulary: “innate talent”, “unwavering dedication”, “converge”
- Advanced grammar: relative clauses, contrast structures
- Balanced perspective showing critical thinking
- Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates ability to discuss abstract concepts, uses a range of complex structures naturally, shows depth of critical thinking
💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:
- innate talent: tài năng bẩm sinh
- give someone a head start: tạo lợi thế ban đầu
- rely solely on: chỉ dựa vào
- unwavering dedication: sự cống hiến kiên định
- the sweet spot: điểm tối ưu, điểm cân bằng hoàn hảo
- converge: hội tụ, kết hợp lại
Học viên Việt Nam tự tin trả lời câu hỏi IELTS Speaking Part 1 về tài năng và kỹ năng cá nhân
IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)
Tổng Quan Về Part 2
Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị và ghi chú. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để demonstrate fluency và ability to speak at length.
Thời gian chuẩn bị: 1 phút
- Đừng lãng phí thời gian này!
- Ghi keywords cho mỗi bullet point, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
- Plan structure: Introduction → Body (cover all bullets) → Conclusion
Thời gian nói: 2-3 phút
- Minimum: 1.5 phút (nếu dưới 1.5 phút sẽ bị trừ điểm)
- Optimal: 2-2.5 phút
- Examiner sẽ ngắt lời khi hết 2 phút, đây là điều bình thường
Chiến lược:
- Cover tất cả bullet points, đặc biệt là câu “explain” cuối cùng
- Sử dụng past tense nếu describe experience trong quá khứ
- Thêm details cụ thể để make your story vivid
- Maintain fluency, đừng pause quá lâu
Lỗi thường gặp:
- Không sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị, rush vào nói ngay
- Nói dưới 1.5 phút do thiếu ý tưởng
- Bỏ sót bullet points, đặc biệt là câu “explain”
- Kể chuyện lan man, không stick to the topic
- Dùng hiện tại khi cần dùng quá khứ
Cue Card
Describe a person who has a special talent
You should say:
- Who this person is
- What special talent they have
- How you know about their talent
- And explain why you think this talent is special
Phân Tích Đề Bài
Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person (miêu tả người)
Thì động từ: Có thể dùng hiện tại (nếu người đó vẫn còn talent hiện tại) hoặc quá khứ (nếu kể về lần đầu biết)
Bullet points phải cover:
- Who this person is: Giới thiệu người đó là ai, mối quan hệ với bạn
- What special talent they have: Miêu tả cụ thể talent, đừng chỉ nói chung chung
- How you know about their talent: Kể story về lần đầu tiên hoặc những lần bạn witness talent đó
- And explain why you think this talent is special: Đây là phần quan trọng nhất – phân tích, đánh giá, express feelings
Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là nơi bạn demonstrate critical thinking và depth. Đừng chỉ nói “because it’s impressive” mà hãy analyze tại sao special, impact như thế nào, khó khăn gì, ý nghĩa gì.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7
Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút
I’d like to talk about my friend Nam, who has a special talent for playing guitar. I met him when we were in university and we became close friends.
Nam is really good at playing guitar. He can play many different types of music, from classical to rock. He started learning guitar when he was 12 years old. Now he can play very difficult songs easily.
I first knew about his talent when he performed at a university event. He played a beautiful song and everyone was impressed. After that, I often asked him to play guitar when we had parties or gatherings. He always played wonderfully and made everyone happy.
I think his talent is special for several reasons. First, he practices a lot to maintain his skill. He spends at least two hours every day practicing. Second, he can also teach other people to play guitar. Many of our friends learned from him. Third, his music always makes people feel good and relaxed.
What makes it more special is that he doesn’t just play, he also creates his own music. He has written several songs and some of them are very popular among our friends. I really admire his talent and hope to learn from him someday.
Phân Tích Band Điểm
| Tiêu chí | Band | Nhận xét |
|---|---|---|
| Fluency & Coherence | 6-7 | Maintains flow, covers all points, uses basic connectors (first, second, third), có một số hesitation nhỏ |
| Lexical Resource | 6-7 | Adequate vocabulary (impressed, maintain, create), một số repetition (play, good), chưa có idiomatic expressions |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 6-7 | Mix của simple và complex sentences, có relative clauses cơ bản, một số lỗi nhỏ không ảnh hưởng communication |
| Pronunciation | 6-7 | Generally clear, dễ hiểu, có thể có một số Vietnamese accent |
Điểm mạnh:
- ✅ Cover đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
- ✅ Có structure rõ ràng với introduction, body, và conclusion
- ✅ Đưa ra nhiều reasons trong phần explain
- ✅ Maintain fluency trong suốt 2 phút
Hạn chế:
- ⚠️ Vocabulary còn basic (good, beautiful, wonderful – repetitive)
- ⚠️ Thiếu vivid details và personal feelings
- ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đa dạng
- ⚠️ Phần “explain” chưa đủ deep và insightful
📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8
Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút
I’d like to tell you about my childhood friend, Linh, who possesses an extraordinary talent for painting. We’ve known each other since we were in primary school, and I’ve had the privilege of witnessing her artistic journey over the past 15 years.
Linh’s talent lies in hyper-realistic portrait painting. What sets her apart is her remarkable ability to capture not just the physical features of a person, but also their emotions and personality through subtle brush strokes and color choices. She specializes in oil painting, and her works are so detailed that they often look like high-resolution photographs at first glance.
I first discovered her talent quite by accident during an art class in secondary school. While most of us were struggling with basic sketches, Linh had already completed a stunning portrait of our art teacher. I remember being absolutely mesmerized by how she managed to capture the teacher’s kind expression and the sparkle in her eyes. Since then, I’ve watched her refine her craft through countless hours of practice and dedication.
What makes her talent truly special, in my opinion, is the combination of technical skill and emotional depth. You see, many people can learn to paint realistically through practice, but Linh has this innate ability to connect with her subjects on a deeper level. Before painting someone, she always spends time talking to them, understanding their stories and personalities. This empathetic approach allows her to create portraits that feel alive and meaningful.
Moreover, despite her exceptional abilities, Linh remains incredibly humble and generous with her knowledge. She regularly conducts free workshops for underprivileged children, believing that art should be accessible to everyone. This combination of talent and character is what makes her truly remarkable in my eyes.
Phân Tích Band Điểm
| Tiêu chí | Band | Nhận xét |
|---|---|---|
| Fluency & Coherence | 7.5-8 | Speaks fluently with minimal hesitation, well-organized với clear progression, effective use của cohesive devices |
| Lexical Resource | 7.5-8 | Wide range của vocabulary, uses less common expressions naturally (mesmerized, refine her craft), good collocations |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 7.5-8 | Variety của complex structures, relative clauses, present perfect, gerunds, mainly error-free |
| Pronunciation | 7.5-8 | Clear pronunciation, natural stress và intonation patterns |
So Sánh Với Band 6-7
| Khía cạnh | Band 6-7 | Band 7.5-8 |
|---|---|---|
| Vocabulary | “really good at playing” | “possesses an extraordinary talent”, “hyper-realistic portrait painting” |
| Grammar | “He can play many types of music” | “I’ve had the privilege of witnessing her artistic journey” (present perfect) |
| Ideas | “He practices a lot” | “combination of technical skill and emotional depth”, “empathetic approach” |
| Details | General descriptions | Specific examples (art class incident, free workshops) |
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9
Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ
I’d like to talk about my former colleague, David, whose exceptional talent for data visualization has genuinely left an indelible mark on how I perceive the intersection between technology and storytelling. We worked together at a tech startup for about three years, and during that time, I had the rare privilege of witnessing what I can only describe as genius at work.
David’s talent is quite niche – he possesses an uncanny ability to transform complex datasets and abstract statistical information into visually compelling narratives that anyone can understand. While this might sound rather technical, what makes him truly special is that he approaches data not as a computer scientist would, but rather with the sensibility of an artist and the intuition of a psychologist. He has this remarkable gift for identifying the human stories hidden within columns of numbers and bringing them to life through innovative visual representations.
I first became aware of his extraordinary abilities during a high-stakes presentation to potential investors. The thing is, our company was struggling to explain our impact metrics, and previous presentations had been met with glazed-over eyes and polite but lukewarm responses. David took the reins and created an interactive visualization that didn’t just show our growth numbers – it took viewers on a journey through the lives of actual users whose experiences had been transformed by our product. I remember being completely blown away by the collective gasp in the room when his visualization revealed the ripple effect our service had created across different communities. That presentation secured us the funding, but more importantly, it demonstrated how powerful thoughtful data representation could be.
What strikes me as particularly remarkable about David’s talent is the painstaking dedication that underpins it. It’s not simply a matter of being naturally gifted with design skills – though he certainly is. He invests countless hours in understanding the context behind every data point, conducting interviews with end-users, and iterating through dozens of prototypes before arriving at the final visualization. I’ve seen him agonize over the choice between different color palettes because he understood how subtle variations in hue could influence emotional responses and comprehension.
Furthermore, his talent transcends mere technical proficiency. What truly sets him apart is his democratizing mission – his genuine conviction that data literacy shouldn’t be the exclusive domain of analysts and researchers. He’s developed open-source tools and conducts pro bono workshops for non-profit organizations, helping them leverage data storytelling to amplify their causes. This synthesis of exceptional skill, creative vision, and social consciousness is what makes his talent not just special, but genuinely transformative.
In retrospect, knowing David has fundamentally changed how I think about talents in general. His example demonstrates that true expertise isn’t just about mastering a craft – it’s about using that mastery to bridge divides, to make the complex accessible, and to empower others through your work.
Phân Tích Band Điểm
| Tiêu chí | Band | Nhận xét |
|---|---|---|
| Fluency & Coherence | 8.5-9 | Speaks fluently với natural, effortless delivery, sophisticated use của cohesive devices, ideas flow logically và naturally |
| Lexical Resource | 8.5-9 | Wide range của sophisticated vocabulary used naturally, precise và idiomatic, effective use của less common expressions, collocations perfect |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 8.5-9 | Full range của structures với flexibility, complex sentences handled với complete naturalness, error-free |
| Pronunciation | 8.5-9 | Native-like features, effective use của intonation patterns, stress và rhythm natural |
Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc
🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
- Không có hesitation, discourse flows như natural conversation
- Uses sophisticated discourse markers naturally: “The thing is”, “What strikes me as”, “In retrospect”
- Transitions seamlessly giữa các ideas
📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:
- “left an indelible mark on” (để lại dấu ấn không thể xóa nhòa) – thay vì “influenced me”
- “possesses an uncanny ability” (có khả năng kỳ lạ, phi thường) – thay vì “is very good at”
- “painstaking dedication” (sự cống hiến tỉ mỉ) – descriptive và precise
- “democratizing mission” (sứ mệnh dân chủ hóa) – shows depth của understanding
- “synthesis of exceptional skill, creative vision, and social consciousness” – complex abstract noun phrase
📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:
- Complex relative clauses: “whose exceptional talent…has genuinely left an indelible mark on how I perceive…”
- Cleft sentences: “What makes him truly special is that…”, “What strikes me as particularly remarkable…”
- Gerund phrases: “identifying the human stories”, “bringing them to life”
- Perfect infinitives: “to have been transformed”
- Participle clauses: “demonstrating how powerful…”, “helping them leverage…”
💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
- Không chỉ describe talent mà analyze its deeper meaning
- Connects talent to broader themes: storytelling, democratization, social impact
- Shows reflection và critical thinking: “In retrospect, knowing David has fundamentally changed…”
- Demonstrates nuanced understanding: talent = skill + dedication + social consciousness
🎨 Storytelling Xuất Sắc:
- Vivid scene-setting: “high-stakes presentation”, “glazed-over eyes”
- Emotional engagement: “being completely blown away”, “collective gasp”
- Specific examples thay vì general statements
- Creates a narrative arc: discovery → demonstration → analysis → reflection
Thí sinh IELTS Speaking tự tin trình bày độc thoại Part 2 về người có tài năng đặc biệt
Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)
Sau khi bạn hoàn thành Part 2, examiner thường hỏi 1-2 câu ngắn để transition sang Part 3. Đây là câu hỏi đơn giản, trả lời tự nhiên trong 2-3 câu.
Question 1: Do you think you could develop a similar talent?
Band 6-7 Answer:
“Maybe, but it would be very difficult. I think I would need a lot of time to practice and learn. It also requires natural ability which I’m not sure I have.”
Band 8-9 Answer:
“That’s an interesting thought. While I certainly admire this talent, I think developing it to that level would require years of dedicated practice and, quite honestly, a certain predisposition that I’m not sure I possess. That said, I believe with the right guidance and commitment, one could at least become reasonably proficient, even if not reaching that extraordinary level of mastery.”
Question 2: Have you ever tried to learn this skill yourself?
Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, I tried it a few times but I wasn’t very successful. It was harder than I thought and I didn’t have enough time to practice regularly.”
Band 8-9 Answer:
“I actually dabbled in it a few years ago, more out of curiosity than any serious ambition. I quickly realized that what looks effortless when experts do it actually requires tremendous technical knowledge and patience. While I didn’t pursue it seriously, the experience gave me an even deeper appreciation for those who excel at it.”
IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion
Tổng Quan Về Part 3
Part 3 là phần thảo luận hai chiều kéo dài 4-5 phút, trong đó examiner sẽ hỏi các câu hỏi trừu tượng và sâu sắc hơn liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2. Đây là phần khó nhất và cũng là nơi bạn có thể thực sự demonstrate band 7.5+.
Yêu cầu:
- Phân tích, compare, evaluate từ nhiều góc độ
- Đưa ra opinions có supporting reasons rõ ràng
- Discuss broader social implications, không chỉ personal experience
- Show ability to think critically và abstractly
Chiến lược:
- Mở rộng câu trả lời (minimum 3-4 câu, optimal 5-7 câu)
- Structure: Direct answer → Reason/Explanation → Example → Further analysis/Nuance
- Sử dụng discourse markers: “Well”, “Actually”, “I suppose”, “From my perspective”
- Acknowledge complexity: “It depends”, “There are different viewpoints”, “On the one hand…on the other hand”
- Connect ideas với real-world examples từ society, history, hoặc research
Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:
- Trả lời quá ngắn, không develop ideas
- Chỉ nói về personal experience thay vì broader context
- Thiếu lý lẽ và evidence để support opinions
- Không sử dụng được từ vựng abstract và academic
- Hesitate nhiều do không có ý tưởng
- Answer câu hỏi literally thay vì explore deeper meanings
Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu
Theme 1: Nature of Talent and Ability
Question 1: Is talent something people are born with or can it be developed?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Opinion với two sides (nature vs nurture debate)
- Key words: born with (innate), developed (acquired through effort)
- Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge both sides, có thể lean về một side nhưng nên balanced, đưa examples cụ thể
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“I think both are important. Some people are born with natural abilities, like being good at music or sports. But they still need to practice a lot to become really good. For example, many famous musicians started with talent but practiced every day for many years. So I believe talent gives you a good start, but hard work is also necessary to succeed.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Opinion stated → Both sides acknowledged → Example → Conclusion
- Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng basic (good at, famous, necessary)
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear communication nhưng lacks sophisticated language và depth of analysis
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“Well, this is quite a contentious debate that’s been going on for centuries, isn’t it? From my perspective, I’d argue that talent is best understood as a spectrum rather than a binary concept. While there’s certainly evidence of innate predispositions – you see child prodigies who demonstrate extraordinary abilities at remarkably young ages – I think what we often perceive as pure natural talent is actually a complex interplay between genetic potential and environmental factors.
On the one hand, research in neuroscience suggests that certain individuals are born with cognitive advantages in specific domains – perhaps a more acute auditory processing system for musicians or enhanced spatial reasoning for mathematicians. On the other hand, longitudinal studies have shown that what really differentiates experts from amateurs is the quantity and quality of deliberate practice they engage in.
What’s fascinating is that even innately gifted individuals can plateau without sustained effort, while those who start with modest abilities can reach remarkable levels through systematic training and unwavering commitment. I think Malcolm Gladwell’s 10,000-hour rule, while perhaps oversimplified, captures an important truth: mastery requires not just talent but relentless dedication. So to answer your question, I’d say talent provides a foundation, but it’s the scaffolding of hard work that determines how high the structure ultimately rises.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Well-organized với clear argument progression: acknowledge debate → present position → explore both sides → synthesis → conclusion
- Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise: “contentious debate”, “spectrum”, “innate predispositions”, “complex interplay”, “plateau”
- Grammar: Complex structures seamlessly integrated: cleft sentences, relative clauses, conditional implications
- Critical Thinking: Shows nuanced understanding, references research/theories (neuroscience, Malcolm Gladwell), acknowledges complexity
- Discourse markers: Natural use của “Well”, “From my perspective”, “On the one hand…On the other hand”, “What’s fascinating”
💡 Key Language Features:
- Discourse markers: Well, From my perspective, On the one hand, On the other hand, What’s fascinating
- Tentative language: I’d argue, I think, perhaps, while perhaps oversimplified
- Abstract nouns: spectrum, predisposition, interplay, foundation, scaffolding
- Academic references: research in neuroscience, longitudinal studies, Malcolm Gladwell’s 10,000-hour rule
Question 2: Why do some talented people never achieve success?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Cause analysis (tại sao)
- Key words: talented people, never achieve success
- Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple factors, examples của famous cases nếu biết, avoid oversimplification
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“There are several reasons why talented people don’t become successful. First, they might not work hard enough because they think their talent is enough. Second, they might not have good opportunities or support from family. Third, some talented people are unlucky and face many difficulties in their life. So even with talent, you need other things to be successful.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Lists reasons systematically với First, Second, Third
- Vocabulary: Clear but simple (work hard, good opportunities, unlucky)
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates main ideas effectively nhưng lacks depth và sophistication
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“That’s a really thought-provoking question because it challenges the common assumption that talent automatically translates into success. I think there are several interconnected factors at play here.
First and foremost, I’d say it often comes down to psychological resilience. Many talented individuals struggle with perfectionism or fear of failure, which can actually be paralyzing. When things come easily at first, they may never develop the coping mechanisms needed to handle setbacks and rejection, which are inevitable in any competitive field. I’ve read about numerous artists and athletes who had tremendous potential but crumbled under pressure when faced with their first major failures.
Equally important is the role of circumstantial factors. Talent without opportunity is like a seed without water – it simply can’t flourish. People from disadvantaged backgrounds might lack access to quality training, mentorship networks, or financial resources necessary to hone their abilities. There’s also what economists call the lottery of birth – being in the right place at the right time, having the right connections.
Moreover, I think some talented people fall victim to complacency. They coast on their natural abilities without putting in the grinding, unglamorous work that expertise demands. There’s this misconception that talent means things should feel easy, but in reality, even prodigies need to push beyond their comfort zones and embrace the tedious process of mastery.
Lastly, we shouldn’t underestimate the element of luck and market dynamics. Sometimes incredibly talented people are working in fields that are saturated or their particular style doesn’t align with current trends. Success often requires not just talent but also strategic positioning and sometimes, frankly, just being in the right place at the right moment.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Complex multi-layered argument: psychological factors → circumstantial factors → personal factors → external factors
- Vocabulary: Sophisticated và domain-specific: “psychological resilience”, “coping mechanisms”, “circumstantial factors”, “lottery of birth”, “market dynamics”
- Grammar: Full range of complex structures used naturally and appropriately
- Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis, acknowledges complexity, uses economic concepts, challenges assumptions
- Examples & Evidence: References research (“I’ve read about”), uses economic terminology (“lottery of birth”), discusses market forces
💡 Key Language Features:
- Opening phrases: That’s a really thought-provoking question, First and foremost, Equally important, Moreover, Lastly
- Hedging language: I’d say, I think, often, sometimes, frankly
- Metaphors: “seed without water”, “grinding, unglamorous work”
- Academic vocabulary: interconnected factors, psychological resilience, circumstantial factors, strategic positioning
Theme 2: Education and Talent Development
Question 1: Should schools focus more on developing students’ talents or teaching general knowledge?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Opinion/Recommendation với two contrasting approaches
- Key words: schools, talents vs general knowledge
- Cách tiếp cận: Balanced argument, consider different educational philosophies, think about practical implications
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“I think schools should do both. General knowledge is important because students need to learn basic subjects like math and language. But schools should also help students find and develop their talents. Maybe they can have special programs or clubs for students with different talents. This way, students can learn both general things and improve their special abilities.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Balanced view stated → Reasons for both → Suggestion
- Vocabulary: Basic educational terminology
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear position nhưng lacks sophisticated argumentation
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“This question really gets to the heart of an ongoing debate in educational philosophy. Ideally, I think we need a nuanced approach that doesn’t treat these as mutually exclusive goals.
On the one hand, there’s a strong argument for well-rounded education that provides all students with a foundational knowledge base. This equips young people with critical thinking skills, cultural literacy, and the versatility needed in our rapidly changing job market. Without this foundation, students might find themselves pigeonholed into narrow specializations without the broader perspective that helps them adapt and innovate.
On the other hand, I think our current education systems often stifle individual potential by forcing everyone through the same one-size-fits-all curriculum. We risk squandering exceptional talents when a mathematically gifted child is forced to spend equal time on subjects they may never use, or when a naturally artistic student is made to feel inadequate because they struggle with standardized testing in academic subjects.
What I envision is more of a hybrid model – perhaps maintaining core requirements in essential areas like literacy, numeracy, and critical thinking, while providing substantial flexibility for students to pursue specialized tracks aligned with their aptitudes and interests. Finland’s education system offers an interesting example where they’ve managed to strike this balance, combining strong fundamentals with significant student autonomy.
The key, I believe, is early identification of talents coupled with personalized learning pathways that allow students to go deeper in areas where they show promise, while still maintaining sufficient breadth to ensure they’re not closing doors prematurely. After all, many of history’s greatest innovators were polymaths who drew connections across disciplines.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Sophisticated argumentation: acknowledge debate → explore both sides with detailed reasoning → propose synthesis → conclusion with broader implication
- Vocabulary: Advanced educational terminology: “well-rounded education”, “cultural literacy”, “one-size-fits-all curriculum”, “personalized learning pathways”, “polymaths”
- Grammar: Complex sentences với multiple clauses handled effortlessly
- Critical Thinking: Shows deep understanding of educational theory, references real example (Finland), considers historical perspective
- Discourse: Natural flow với sophisticated markers
Question 2: Do you think talented children should be educated separately from others?
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“This is quite a contentious issue that elicits strong opinions on both sides. Personally, I have mixed feelings about segregating gifted children into separate educational tracks.
The case for specialized education is compelling: talented children often find regular classrooms intellectually unstimulating and may disengage if not sufficiently challenged. Gifted programs allow them to learn at an accelerated pace with peers who share their abilities, potentially maximizing their potential. Countries like Singapore have had considerable success with this streamed approach.
However, I have reservations about the social and psychological implications. Segregation – even when well-intentioned – can create an elitist environment that breeds arrogance in gifted students while fostering resentment among those excluded. Children need to develop emotional intelligence and social awareness, which comes from interacting with diverse peers with varied abilities and backgrounds.
Moreover, there’s the issue of self-fulfilling prophecies. Students labeled as less talented may internalize these limitations, while the pressure on gifted students can be crushing. I’ve read studies showing that children in mixed-ability classrooms often develop better collaborative skills and more realistic self-assessments.
My preferred approach would be differentiated instruction within inclusive classrooms – where teachers tailor content to different ability levels while maintaining a cohesive learning community. This requires more pedagogical sophistication and resources, but I believe it offers the best of both worlds: challenge for advanced students without the social fragmentation that separation creates.”
Giáo viên IELTS hướng dẫn học sinh phát triển kỹ năng nói về tài năng và giáo dục
Theme 3: Talent in Modern Society
Question 1: How has technology changed the way people develop and showcase their talents?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Analyze changes/impact (How has…changed)
- Key words: technology, develop, showcase talents
- Cách tiếp cận: Compare past and present, give specific examples của platforms/technologies, consider both positive and negative impacts
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“Technology has changed things a lot. In the past, people needed to go to schools or studios to learn and practice their talents. Now they can learn online through YouTube or other websites. Also, people can show their talents on social media like Instagram or TikTok. This makes it easier for talented people to become famous. However, there is also more competition now because many people can share their work online.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Clear comparison past vs present, mentions specific platforms
- Vocabulary: Basic tech vocabulary, adequate for communication
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses question directly with relevant examples nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated analysis
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“Technology has fundamentally revolutionized both the acquisition and demonstration of talent in ways that would have been unimaginable just a generation ago.
In terms of development, we’ve witnessed a democratization of access to high-quality learning resources. Aspiring musicians can access masterclasses from world-renowned virtuosos through platforms like MasterClass, artists can learn techniques from leading practitioners via YouTube tutorials, and programmers can develop expertise through free online courses from top universities. This has essentially dismantled the traditional gatekeeping structures – you no longer need expensive private tutors or admission to prestigious institutions to access excellent instruction.
Even more transformative is how technology has created unprecedented opportunities for showcasing talent. Social media platforms have become powerful launching pads for careers. We’ve seen countless examples of people catapulting to fame through viral videos – musicians like Justin Bieber were discovered on YouTube, digital artists build massive followings on Instagram, writers find audiences through Medium and Substack. The intermediary role of traditional gatekeepers – record labels, galleries, publishers – has been significantly diminished.
However, this double-edged sword cuts both ways. While visibility is now democratized, the sheer volume of content creates a signal-to-noise problem. Talented individuals must now also be savvy marketers and algorithm experts to get noticed amid the deluge. There’s also the risk of prioritizing virality over depth – talents that are instantly gratifying or visually striking tend to gain traction more easily than those requiring sustained attention or nuanced appreciation.
Furthermore, I think we’re seeing a shift toward what I’d call micro-specialization. Technology allows people to find niche audiences for highly specialized talents that would never have been commercially viable in the pre-internet era. Someone with an obscure skill – say, restoring vintage typewriters or creating miniature sculptures – can now connect with a global community of enthusiasts and build a sustainable practice.
On balance, while I believe technology has expanded opportunities exponentially, it’s also created new challenges around standing out in an oversaturated marketplace and maintaining authentic creative development rather than just chasing metrics.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Comprehensive analysis covering multiple dimensions: development/learning → showcasing/visibility → challenges → specialization → balanced conclusion
- Vocabulary: Sophisticated tech and social terminology: “democratization”, “gatekeeping structures”, “catapulting to fame”, “signal-to-noise problem”, “micro-specialization”
- Grammar: Complex structures used flexibly: cleft sentences, passive constructions, parallel structures
- Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis, acknowledges complexity, uses specific examples (Justin Bieber, platforms), introduces original concepts (micro-specialization, signal-to-noise)
- Balanced perspective: Shows both positive impacts và potential downsides
💡 Key Language Features:
- Academic phrases: fundamentally revolutionized, democratization of access, unprecedented opportunities, double-edged sword
- Sophisticated connectors: In terms of, Even more transformative, However, Furthermore, On balance
- Hedging: I think, I believe, tend to
- Technical vocabulary: algorithm experts, virality, metrics, niche audiences
Question 2: Do you think society values certain talents more than others? Why?
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“Absolutely, and I think this differential valuation reveals a lot about our collective priorities and economic structures.
Most obviously, we tend to lionize talents that have clear commercial applications or entertainment value. Athletes, entertainers, and tech entrepreneurs enjoy celebrity status and astronomical earnings, while equally talented individuals in fields like social work, education, or artisan crafts often struggle for recognition and fair compensation. This hierarchy largely reflects market forces – skills that can be monetized at scale or that attract large audiences are disproportionately rewarded.
There’s also a cultural dimension to this. Different societies privilege different talents based on their values and historical contexts. In many Asian countries, there’s traditionally been enormous prestige attached to academic excellence and technical proficiency, whereas Western societies often place a premium on creative innovation and entrepreneurial risk-taking. These cultural frameworks shape not just which talents are rewarded, but which ones children are encouraged to develop in the first place.
What I find particularly troubling is how we often undervalue talents that are essential to societal functioning but difficult to quantify or don’t fit our narrow definition of productivity. Emotional intelligence, caregiving abilities, community building skills – these are profoundly important talents that hold communities together, yet they’re rarely celebrated or compensated adequately because they don’t easily translate into GDP metrics.
Moreover, I think there’s a recency bias at play. We’re currently in an era that glorifies technological prowess and digital literacy, but this wasn’t always the case and likely won’t remain so indefinitely. The talents society values shift with economic paradigms and technological disruptions. A century ago, being a skilled manual craftsperson carried tremendous prestige; now those same skills are often marginalized as low-status work.
Ultimately, I believe this hierarchy of talents is socially constructed rather than inherently justified. A truly enlightened society would recognize the diverse forms of human excellence and create systems that honor contributions across a broader spectrum of abilities, not just those that happen to be economically fashionable at a particular historical moment.”
Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng
Topic-Specific Vocabulary
| Từ vựng/Cụm từ | Loại từ | Phiên âm | Nghĩa tiếng Việt | Ví dụ | Collocation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| innate talent | noun phrase | /ɪˈneɪt ˈtælənt/ | tài năng bẩm sinh | She has an innate talent for music. | natural talent, inherent ability, born gifted |
| hone a skill | verb phrase | /həʊn ə skɪl/ | mài giũa, rèn luyện kỹ năng | He spent years honing his skills as a painter. | refine, perfect, develop, sharpen |
| prodigy | noun | /ˈprɒdɪdʒi/ | thần đồng | Mozart was a child prodigy who composed music at age five. | child prodigy, musical prodigy, chess prodigy |
| gifted | adjective | /ˈɡɪftɪd/ | có năng khiếu, tài năng | She’s a gifted linguist who speaks six languages. | highly gifted, naturally gifted, exceptionally gifted |
| aptitude | noun | /ˈæptɪtjuːd/ | năng khiếu, khả năng thiên bẩm | He has a natural aptitude for mathematics. | natural aptitude, special aptitude, aptitude for |
| virtuoso | noun | /ˌvɜːtʃuˈəʊzəʊ/ | nghệ sĩ tài ba, bậc thầy | She’s a piano virtuoso who performs worldwide. | virtuoso performance, virtuoso pianist, accomplished virtuoso |
| mastery | noun | /ˈmɑːstəri/ | sự thành thạo, tinh thông | His mastery of the guitar is impressive. | complete mastery, technical mastery, achieve mastery |
| excel at | verb phrase | /ɪkˈsel æt/ | xuất sắc về, giỏi về | She excels at public speaking. | excel in, particularly excel, naturally excel |
| exceptional ability | noun phrase | /ɪkˈsepʃənl əˈbɪləti/ | khả năng phi thường | Her exceptional ability to memorize is remarkable. | extraordinary ability, remarkable ability, outstanding ability |
| cultivate talent | verb phrase | /ˈkʌltɪveɪt ˈtælənt/ | nuôi dưỡng tài năng | Good schools cultivate talent in young students. | nurture, develop, foster talent |
| raw talent | noun phrase | /rɔː ˈtælənt/ | tài năng thô, chưa mài giũa | He has raw talent but needs proper training. | untapped potential, natural ability, unrefined skill |
| repertoire | noun | /ˈrepətwɑː(r)/ | vốn tiết mục, danh mục kỹ năng | She has an impressive repertoire of classical pieces. | extensive repertoire, wide repertoire, build repertoire |
| demonstrate prowess | verb phrase | /ˈdeməntreɪt ˈpraʊəs/ | thể hiện tài năng, khả năng | He demonstrated his prowess in the competition. | show prowess, display prowess, athletic prowess |
| latent potential | noun phrase | /ˈleɪtnt pəˈtenʃl/ | tiềm năng ẩn giấu | Many people have latent potential that never develops. | hidden potential, untapped potential, dormant potential |
| savant | noun | /sæˈvɑːnt/ | người có tài năng đặc biệt (thường trong một lĩnh vực) | He’s a mathematical savant with incredible abilities. | savant syndrome, gifted savant, artistic savant |
Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases
| Cụm từ | Nghĩa | Ví dụ sử dụng | Band điểm |
|---|---|---|---|
| have a knack for | có khiếu về, giỏi tự nhiên về | She has a real knack for languages and picks them up easily. | 7.5-8 |
| second to none | không ai sánh kịp, xuất sắc nhất | Her skills as a surgeon are second to none. | 7.5-8 |
| in a league of their own | ở một đẳng cấp riêng | When it comes to chess, he’s in a league of his own. | 8-9 |
| cut above the rest | vượt trội hơn những người khác | Her artistic abilities are a cut above the rest. | 7.5-8 |
| natural flair for | có tài tự nhiên về | He has a natural flair for dramatic performance. | 7.5-8 |
| jack of all trades | người biết làm nhiều thứ (nhưng không chuyên sâu) | He’s a jack of all trades but master of none. | 7-8 |
| hidden gem | viên ngọc ẩn giấu, tài năng chưa được phát hiện | She’s a hidden gem waiting to be discovered. | 7.5-8 |
| the cream of the crop | những người giỏi nhất, ưu tú nhất | These students are the cream of the crop. | 8-9 |
| rise to the occasion | vươn lên đáp ứng thách thức | When challenged, she always rises to the occasion. | 7.5-8 |
| push the envelope | vượt qua giới hạn, đổi mới | Great artists push the envelope and challenge conventions. | 8-9 |
| ahead of the curve | đi trước thời đại, tiên phong | His innovative techniques put him ahead of the curve. | 8-9 |
| set the bar high | đặt tiêu chuẩn cao | Her performance set the bar high for others. | 7.5-8 |
Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)
Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:
- 📝 Well,… – Dùng khi cần suy nghĩ hoặc soften câu trả lời
- 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc correct một assumption
- 📝 To be honest,… – Khi nói thật, thể hiện sincerity
- 📝 I’d say that… – Cách softer để đưa ra quan điểm
- 📝 From my perspective,… – Nhấn mạnh đây là quan điểm cá nhân
- 📝 In my view,… – Tương tự “from my perspective”
Để bổ sung ý:
- 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó (slightly informal nhưng natural)
- 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, quan trọng hơn
- 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
- 📝 Furthermore,… – Hơn nữa (formal hơn)
- 📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó
- 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra
Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:
- 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
- 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… chúng ta cũng cần xem xét
- 📝 Admittedly,… however,… – Phải thừa nhận… tuy nhiên
- 📝 That being said,… – Tuy nhiên, dù vậy
- 📝 Having said that,… – Đã nói vậy nhưng
Để giải thích và làm rõ:
- 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là
- 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác
- 📝 To put it another way,… – Nói theo cách khác
- 📝 The thing is,… – Vấn đề là (very natural)
- 📝 You see,… – Bạn thấy đấy (creates engagement)
Để kết luận:
- 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại
- 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì
- 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng, về cơ bản
- 📝 In a nutshell,… – Tóm gọn lại
- 📝 To sum up,… – Tóm lại
Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng
1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):
Mixed conditional:
- Formula: If + past perfect, would/could + bare infinitive
- Ví dụ: “If she had received proper training earlier, she would be a world-class pianist now.”
- Khi nào dùng: Nói về điều kiện trong quá khứ ảnh hưởng đến hiện tại
Inversion in conditionals:
- Formula: Should/Were/Had + subject + verb
- Ví dụ: “Had he been given more opportunities, he might have achieved greater success.”
- Khi nào dùng: Formal style, impressive trong IELTS Speaking Part 3
2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):
Non-defining relative clauses:
- Formula: …, which/who/whose + clause, …
- Ví dụ: “My sister, who has been playing violin for 15 years, recently won a national competition.”
- Khi nào dùng: Thêm thông tin về noun, tạo câu phức tạp và natural
3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):
Impersonal passive:
- Formula: It is thought/believed/said/considered that…
- Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that talent without practice leads nowhere.”
- Khi nào dùng: Đưa ra general opinions, sounds academic và objective
Passive with reporting verbs:
- Formula: Subject + is/are thought/believed/said to…
- Ví dụ: “Mozart is thought to have composed his first piece at age five.”
4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):
What-cleft:
- Formula: What + subject + verb + is/was + noun phrase
- Ví dụ: “What I find most impressive is her ability to improvise under pressure.”
- Khi nào dùng: Nhấn mạnh information mới, sounds natural và sophisticated
It-cleft:
- Formula: It + is/was + noun phrase + that/who + clause
- Ví dụ: “It was her dedication that made the difference, not just her talent.”
- Khi nào dùng: Emphasize một phần cụ thể của câu
The thing that:
- Formula: The thing that + clause + is/was + noun phrase
- Ví dụ: “The thing that sets exceptional people apart is their resilience in the face of failure.”
5. Participle Clauses:
Present participle:
- Formula: …verb-ing…, subject + verb
- Ví dụ: “Having practiced for years, she developed remarkable technical proficiency.”
Past participle:
- Formula: Past participle phrase, subject + verb
- Ví dụ: “Encouraged by her early success, she decided to pursue music professionally.”
6. Inversion for Emphasis:
Negative adverbials:
- Formula: Never/Rarely/Seldom + auxiliary + subject + verb
- Ví dụ: “Rarely have I seen such natural talent combined with such dedication.”
- Khi nào dùng: Formal style, creates dramatic effect
Only:
- Formula: Only by/through + verb-ing + auxiliary + subject + verb
- Ví dụ: “Only by practicing consistently can one achieve mastery.”
Bảng từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng chủ đề tài năng trong IELTS Speaking
Chiến Lược Tổng Thể Để Đạt Band Cao
Chuẩn Bị Trước Khi Thi
1. Xây Dựng Kho Ý Tưởng Cá Nhân:
- Brainstorm 5-6 people với different talents mà bạn có thể nói về
- Prepare stories cụ thể với vivid details
- Practice telling these stories naturally, không thuộc lòng
- Đảm bảo stories có thể adapt cho different questions
2. Phát Triển Từ Vựng Contextually:
- Học từ vựng trong context của câu, không học isolated words
- Practice collocations (từ đi với từ nào)
- Record yourself sử dụng new vocabulary
- Không học quá nhiều từ fancy mà không biết dùng naturally
3. Luyện Tập Fluency:
- Practice speaking for 2 minutes without stopping
- Record và listen lại để identify hesitation patterns
- Work on linking words và fillers để maintain flow
- Don’t overthink grammar – prioritize communication
4. Phát Triển Critical Thinking:
- Practice analyzing issues từ multiple perspectives
- Đọc opinion articles để expose yourself với different viewpoints
- Ask yourself “why” và “what if” questions
- Learn to acknowledge complexity rather than oversimplify
Trong Phòng Thi
Part 1 Strategy:
- Answer directly first, then expand
- Aim for 2-3 sentences per answer
- Be natural và conversational
- Don’t overthink – treat it like friendly chat
Part 2 Strategy:
- Use full 1 minute để plan với keywords
- Structure: Intro → Body (cover bullets systematically) → Conclusion
- Include specific details và personal reactions
- Monitor time – aim for 2+ minutes
- If you forget something, keep going – don’t panic
Part 3 Strategy:
- Take a moment để think before answering complex questions
- Structure longer answers: Direct answer → Reasons → Examples → Conclusion
- Use discourse markers to organize thoughts
- It’s OK to say “That’s an interesting question” hoặc “I haven’t thought about that before”
- Show you can think critically – acknowledge different viewpoints
Những Điều Nên Tránh
❌ Học thuộc templates – Examiners nhận ra ngay và sẽ downgrade
❌ Sử dụng từ vựng quá phức tạp không naturally – Better to use simple words correctly
❌ Nói quá nhanh – Speed doesn’t equal fluency; clarity matters more
❌ Correct yourself quá nhiều – Minor mistakes are OK, don’t interrupt flow
❌ Oversimplify trong Part 3 – Show depth of thinking
❌ Give very short answers – Especially trong Part 3, develop your ideas
❌ Fake stories – Examiners can tell; be authentic
Luyện Tập Hiệu Quả
Daily Practice Routine:
- 10 phút: Answer 3-4 Part 1 questions về different topics
- 5 phút: Brainstorm ideas cho một Part 2 topic
- 10 phút: Do một full Part 2 response và record
- 10 phút: Answer 2-3 Part 3 questions với detailed responses
- 5 phút: Review recording, identify areas to improve
Weekly Goals:
- Complete 5-7 full speaking tests
- Learn và practice 20-30 new vocabulary items contextually
- Watch TED talks hoặc podcasts để expose to natural English
- Practice with speaking partner nếu có thể
Mindset Để Thành Công
✅ Confidence is key – Even if nervous, project confidence through body language
✅ Be yourself – Authenticity is more impressive than perfection
✅ Engage with examiner – Make eye contact, smile, show interest
✅ See it as conversation – Not interrogation, but opportunity to showcase English
✅ Learn from mistakes – Every practice test teaches something
✅ Stay positive – Don’t let one weak answer affect the rest
Kết Luận
Chủ đề “Describe a person who has a special talent” là một trong những topics thú vị và versatile nhất trong IELTS Speaking. Thành công với chủ đề này đòi hỏi không chỉ vocabulary tốt mà còn ability to tell engaging stories và analyze abstract concepts critically.
Key Takeaways:
🎯 Về Nội Dung:
- Choose real people và real stories – authenticity shines through
- Develop stories với specific details thay vì general descriptions
- Trong Part 3, demonstrate critical thinking bằng cách explore multiple perspectives
- Connect personal experiences với broader social implications
📚 Về Ngôn Ngữ:
- Prioritize natural, idiomatic expressions over complex vocabulary
- Use discourse markers to structure responses
- Employ range của grammatical structures nhưng đảm bảo accuracy
- Collocations và phrasal verbs make speech more native-like
🎙️ Về Delivery:
- Maintain fluency – minor mistakes are acceptable
- Use appropriate intonation để emphasize key points
- Engage với examiner through eye contact và natural body language
- Manage time effectively, đặc biệt trong Part 2
💡 Về Preparation:
- Practice regularly với variety of talent-related topics
- Record yourself và analyze performance critically
- Build vocabulary bank contextually, not through isolated lists
- Develop critical thinking skills bằng cách đọc và analyze diverse viewpoints
Remember, IELTS Speaking đánh giá communication ability của bạn, not perfection. Examiner muốn hear natural, engaging conversation with clear ideas được express confidently. Practice consistently, stay authentic, và trust in your preparation.
Với mindset đúng, preparation kỹ lưỡng, và consistent practice, bạn hoàn toàn có thể achieve band score mục tiêu của mình. Good luck với IELTS Speaking test!
