IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe a Person Who Is Very Good at Problem-Solving” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề “Describe A Person Who Is Very Good At Problem-solving” là một đề bài thú vị và khá phổ biến trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking. Đây là dạng câu hỏi yêu cầu thí sinh miêu tả một người có kỹ năng giải quyết vấn đề xuất sắc – một chủ đề vừa thiết thực vừa cho phép bạn thể hiện khả năng ngôn ngữ đa dạng.

Theo thống kê từ các trung tâm thi IELTS và diễn đàn chia sẻ đề thi thực tế, chủ đề về “people” và đặc biệt là những người có kỹ năng đặc biệt xuất hiện với tần suất khá cao trong các kỳ thi từ năm 2022 đến nay. Đề bài này đặc biệt phổ biến vì nó cho phép giám khảo đánh giá khả năng miêu tả con người, giải thích hành vi và phân tích tính cách của thí sinh.

Trong bài viết này, với vai trò là một IELTS Speaking Examiner có hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm, tôi sẽ chia sẻ với bạn:

• Các câu hỏi thường gặp trong cả 3 phần thi Speaking liên quan đến chủ đề này
• Bài mẫu chi tiết theo từng band điểm từ 6-7, 7.5-8 đến 8.5-9 với phân tích cụ thể
• Kho từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm giúp bạn nâng band
• Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của giám khảo
• Những lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục

Khả năng xuất hiện của chủ đề này trong tương lai được đánh giá ở mức cao, đặc biệt khi các kỹ năng mềm như problem-solving đang được đề cao trong xã hội hiện đại.

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking thường kéo dài từ 4-5 phút, trong đó giám khảo sẽ hỏi các câu hỏi ngắn về cuộc sống hàng ngày, sở thích và trải nghiệm cá nhân của bạn. Đây là phần “warm-up” giúp bạn làm quen với không khí thi cử và giám khảo.

Chiến lược quan trọng nhất cho Part 1 là trả lời tự nhiên và mở rộng câu trả lời của bạn thành 2-3 câu thay vì chỉ Yes/No đơn giản. Mỗi câu trả lời nên bao gồm: câu trả lời trực tiếp, lý do hoặc giải thích, và một ví dụ cụ thể nếu có thể.

Các lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 1:

• Trả lời quá ngắn gọn, thiếu elaboration
• Sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản, lặp đi lặp lại
• Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
• Nghe không kỹ câu hỏi dẫn đến trả lời lạc đề

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you consider yourself good at solving problems?

Question 2: What kind of problems do you usually face in your daily life?

Question 3: Who do you usually turn to when you have a problem?

Question 4: Do you prefer to solve problems on your own or ask for help?

Question 5: Have you ever helped someone else solve a difficult problem?

Question 6: What qualities do you think a good problem-solver should have?

Question 7: Do you think problem-solving skills can be learned or are people born with them?

Question 8: How do you usually feel when facing a difficult problem?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you consider yourself good at solving problems?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp Yes/No hoặc “to some extent”
• Đưa ra lý do hoặc ví dụ minh họa
• Thêm một chi tiết cụ thể để câu trả lời thêm phần tự nhiên

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think I’m quite good at solving problems, especially simple ones in daily life. When I face a problem, I usually try to stay calm and think of different solutions. For example, last week my phone stopped working and I managed to fix it by watching some YouTube tutorials.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, có ví dụ cụ thể từ cuộc sống
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (good, simple, fix), thiếu cấu trúc phức tạp
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời rõ ràng và có nội dung, nhưng vocabulary và grammar chưa đủ sophisticated để đạt band cao hơn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’d say I’m reasonably adept at problem-solving, though it really depends on the nature of the challenge. I tend to approach difficulties methodically by breaking them down into smaller, more manageable components. Just recently, I troubleshot a technical issue with my laptop by systematically eliminating potential causes, which saved me from an expensive repair bill.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng từ vựng tinh tế (adept at, methodically, manageable components, systematically eliminating), cấu trúc câu đa dạng, thừa nhận complexity của vấn đề (“depends on the nature”)
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Natural flow với discourse marker “I’d say”
  • Vocabulary: Precise và less common words (adept, methodically, troubleshot)
  • Grammar: Complex structures và appropriate tenses
  • Content: Balanced view với ví dụ cụ thể và relevant

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• reasonably adept at: khá giỏi trong việc gì đó (tinh tế hơn “good at”)
• approach methodically: tiếp cận một cách có phương pháp
• manageable components: các phần có thể quản lý được
• troubleshoot: khắc phục sự cố (từ chuyên ngành technical)
• systematically eliminate: loại trừ một cách có hệ thống

---

Question: Who do you usually turn to when you have a problem?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu rõ đối tượng bạn thường nhờ giúp đỡ
• Giải thích tại sao bạn chọn người đó
• Có thể thêm ví dụ về một lần cụ thể

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“When I have a problem, I usually ask my older brother for help. He is very smart and experienced, so he can give me good advice. Sometimes I also talk to my close friends because they understand me well and can support me.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Câu trả lời rõ ràng, có lý do cụ thể
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng basic (smart, good advice, understand me well), cấu trúc câu đơn giản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đáp ứng yêu cầu nhưng thiếu depth và sophistication trong ngôn ngữ

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, it really depends on the type of problem I’m facing. For practical issues, I typically consult my father, who has a wealth of life experience and a very pragmatic approach to challenges. However, when it comes to more personal dilemmas, I tend to confide in my best friend, as she’s exceptionally level-headed and offers unbiased perspectives.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Vocabulary: Sophisticated expressions (wealth of experience, pragmatic approach, confide in, level-headed, unbiased perspectives)
  • Structure: Well-organized với clear contrast (practical vs personal)
  • Grammar: Varied structures including relative clauses và complex sentences
  • Content: Nuanced answer showing different situations
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates flexibility trong thinking và excellent command of language với precise vocabulary choices

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• depends on the type of problem: tùy thuộc vào loại vấn đề
• consult someone: tham khảo ý kiến ai đó (formal hơn “ask”)
• a wealth of experience: rất nhiều kinh nghiệm
• pragmatic approach: cách tiếp cận thực tế
• confide in someone: tâm sự, chia sẻ bí mật với ai
• level-headed: điềm tĩnh, sáng suốt
• unbiased perspectives: quan điểm khách quan, không thiên vị

---

Question: Do you think problem-solving skills can be learned or are people born with them?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đưa ra quan điểm rõ ràng (learned/born/both)
• Giải thích lý do cho quan điểm của bạn
• Có thể đưa ra ví dụ hoặc evidence để support

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I believe problem-solving skills can be learned through practice and experience. When people face many problems in life, they become better at finding solutions. Schools also teach students how to think critically and solve problems, so I think everyone can improve this skill.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có position statement rõ ràng, đưa ra reasoning logic
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary còn basic (face problems, find solutions, think critically), thiếu depth trong analysis
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear communication nhưng lacks sophistication trong language và ideas

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’d argue it’s a combination of both nature and nurture. While some individuals might have an innate aptitude for analytical thinking, I believe the majority of problem-solving skills are acquired through experience and deliberate practice. For instance, exposure to diverse challenges throughout life helps people develop mental frameworks for tackling new problems. That said, natural curiosity and cognitive flexibility might give certain people a slight edge in this area.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Vocabulary: High-level expressions (innate aptitude, acquired through experience, mental frameworks, cognitive flexibility, a slight edge)
  • Structure: Balanced argument acknowledging both sides
  • Grammar: Complex structures với appropriate hedging language
  • Critical Thinking: Nuanced view showing deep understanding of the topic
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates sophisticated thinking với precise academic vocabulary và ability to discuss abstract concepts naturally

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• a combination of nature and nurture: sự kết hợp giữa bẩm sinh và nuôi dưỡng
• innate aptitude: năng khiếu bẩm sinh
• acquired through experience: có được qua kinh nghiệm
• exposure to diverse challenges: tiếp xúc với nhiều thách thức đa dạng
• develop mental frameworks: phát triển khung tư duy
• cognitive flexibility: sự linh hoạt trong nhận thức
• give someone a slight edge: mang lại lợi thế nhỏ cho ai đó

Học viên đang chuẩn bị trả lời các câu hỏi IELTS Speaking Part 1 về kỹ năng giải quyết vấn đề

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn sẽ có 1 phút chuẩn bị và ghi chú trước khi nói. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để thể hiện khả năng diễn đạt liên tục của bạn.

Chiến lược quan trọng:

• Sử dụng đầy đủ 1 phút để ghi chú keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Cố gắng nói đủ 2 phút (tối thiểu 1.5 phút) để tránh mất điểm
• Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trong đề bài
• Tập trung vào câu “explain” cuối cùng vì đây là nơi bạn show được sự sâu sắc
• Sử dụng thì động từ phù hợp (thường là quá khứ khi kể về một người cụ thể)

Lỗi thường gặp:

• Không sử dụng hết thời gian chuẩn bị, vội vàng bắt đầu nói
• Nói quá ngắn (dưới 1.5 phút) hoặc dừng giữa chừng
• Bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points
• Lạc đề, không focus vào người “good at problem-solving”

Cue Card

Describe a person who is very good at problem-solving

You should say:

• Who this person is
• How you know this person
• What kind of problems this person is good at solving
• And explain why you think this person is very good at problem-solving

Phân Tích Đề Bài

• Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person (miêu tả người)
• Thì động từ: Chủ yếu là hiện tại đơn (khi nói về đặc điểm) và quá khứ đơn (khi kể các examples cụ thể)
• Bullet points phải cover:
  • Who: Danh tính, mối quan hệ với bạn
  • How you know: Hoàn cảnh quen biết, thời gian biết nhau
  • What kind of problems: Loại vấn đề họ giỏi giải quyết (technical, personal, work-related…)
  • Why you think so: Đây là phần quan trọng nhất – cần giải thích cụ thể với examples
• Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần này chiếm khoảng 40-50% bài nói, cần có ví dụ cụ thể, qualities của người đó, và impact của họ

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

“I’d like to talk about my uncle, Mr. Thanh, who is very good at solving problems. He is my father’s younger brother and he’s about 45 years old now.

I’ve known him since I was a child because he often visits our family on weekends and special occasions. He works as an IT manager at a big technology company in Ho Chi Minh City, so he’s quite busy most of the time.

My uncle is particularly good at solving technical problems, especially those related to computers and technology. Whenever anyone in our family has issues with their phones, laptops, or any electronic devices, we always call him for help. He can fix almost anything related to technology.

I think he’s very good at problem-solving for several reasons. First, he always stays calm when facing difficulties. He never gets stressed or worried, which helps him think clearly. Second, he has a lot of knowledge about technology and computers, so he knows many solutions. Last year, when my laptop crashed and I lost all my important files for university, he managed to recover everything within just a few hours. I was so grateful.

Additionally, he’s very patient and willing to explain things to others. He doesn’t just fix the problem but also teaches us how to prevent similar issues in the future. This quality makes him a great problem-solver in my opinion.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có linking words cơ bản (first, second, additionally), flow tương đối tốt nhưng còn đơn giản
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng adequate (stays calm, has issues with, recover files) nhưng chưa sophisticated
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Mix của simple và complex sentences, có một số errors nhỏ về article
Pronunciation	6-7	Rõ ràng và dễ hiểu, có thể có accent nhẹ

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
• ✅ Có ví dụ cụ thể (laptop crashed, recovered files)
• ✅ Structure rõ ràng, dễ follow
• ✅ Đủ thời lượng (khoảng 1.5-2 phút)

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Từ vựng còn basic và repetitive (good at, fix problems, help)
• ⚠️ Thiếu idiomatic expressions
• ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đủ varied và complex

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

“I’d like to describe my former colleague, Sarah, who I consider to be exceptionally skilled at problem-solving. She worked as a project manager at the marketing agency where I did my internship last year.

I got to know Sarah during my three-month internship program. She was assigned as my mentor, so I had the opportunity to observe her work style closely and learn from her hands-on approach to challenges. She’s in her early thirties and has about eight years of experience in the marketing industry.

What makes Sarah particularly remarkable is her ability to tackle a wide range of problems, from interpersonal conflicts within teams to complex logistical issues in campaign management. I remember one instance when a major client threatened to pull out of a multi-million-dollar contract due to some miscommunication. Sarah managed to salvage the relationship by organizing an emergency meeting, addressing their concerns systematically, and proposing alternative solutions that actually exceeded their original expectations.

I believe Sarah is an outstanding problem-solver for several reasons. Firstly, she has this remarkable ability to remain composed under pressure. While others might panic, she takes a step back to analyze the situation objectively. Secondly, she’s incredibly resourceful – she always finds creative ways to work around constraints, whether it’s limited budget or tight deadlines.

What impresses me most is her collaborative approach. Rather than making decisions in isolation, she brings relevant stakeholders together, listens to different perspectives, and synthesizes everyone’s input into actionable solutions. This not only solves the immediate problem but also builds team cohesion and prevents similar issues from recurring. Her methodical yet flexible mindset is something I really admire and try to emulate in my own work.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Smooth flow với sophisticated linking, develops ideas logically
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range của less common vocabulary với precise meaning (salvage, synthesizes, emulate)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Variety của complex structures với high degree of accuracy
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear và natural với appropriate stress và intonation

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“good at solving problems”, “fix”, “help”	“exceptionally skilled”, “tackle challenges”, “salvage the relationship”, “synthesizes”
Grammar	“He is very good at…”, “I think he’s…”	“What makes her remarkable is…”, “Rather than making decisions…”, “This not only solves… but also…”
Ideas	General qualities (calm, patient)	Specific examples với detailed analysis (salvaging client relationship, collaborative approach)

Minh họa bài nói IELTS Speaking Part 2 về người giỏi giải quyết vấn đề

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

“I’d like to talk about my neighbor, Dr. Minh, who I regard as one of the most exceptionally analytical individuals I’ve ever encountered. He’s a renowned cardiovascular surgeon in his late forties, and what truly sets him apart is his uncanny ability to solve problems both within and beyond his professional sphere.

I’ve known Dr. Minh for approximately five years now, ever since my family relocated to our current neighborhood. Our relationship evolved from casual neighborly interactions to a more meaningful mentorship, particularly after I expressed interest in pursuing a career in healthcare. Through our regular conversations, I’ve gained invaluable insights into his problem-solving methodology.

What makes Dr. Minh particularly impressive is his versatility in addressing challenges across diverse domains. Professionally, he’s known for his decisive approach to critical medical situations. I recall him mentioning a case where he had to improvise during an emergency surgery when unexpected complications arose – he drew upon his extensive experience and adapted his surgical strategy in real-time, ultimately saving the patient’s life. Beyond his medical practice, he’s equally adept at resolving community-level issues. Last year, when our neighborhood faced chronic flooding during monsoon season, he spearheaded an initiative to redesign the drainage system, liaising with local authorities and mobilizing residents to implement sustainable solutions.

What I find most remarkable about his problem-solving prowess is his multifaceted approach. Firstly, he possesses extraordinary emotional intelligence – he recognizes that many problems have underlying human elements that need to be addressed before tackling the technical aspects. When dealing with patients’ families, for instance, he doesn’t just present medical options; he takes time to understand their concerns, cultural sensitivities, and emotional states, which facilitates more effective decision-making.

Secondly, he exemplifies what I call “structured creativity.” He follows a systematic diagnostic process – gathering information, identifying patterns, and testing hypotheses – but he’s not constrained by conventional thinking. He encourages out-of-the-box solutions while maintaining scientific rigor. This balance between methodical analysis and innovative thinking is particularly evident in how he mentors younger doctors, fostering an environment where they feel empowered to challenge traditional approaches while respecting evidence-based practice.

Moreover, his long-term perspective is truly admirable. Unlike those who seek quick fixes, Dr. Minh always considers the broader implications of his solutions. He asks questions like “How will this affect stakeholders six months from now?” or “What unintended consequences might arise?” This forward-thinking mentality has earned him tremendous respect in both professional and personal circles.

What resonates with me most deeply is his belief that effective problem-solving is fundamentally about empowering others. He often says, “The best solution isn’t necessarily the one I devise, but the one that enables others to solve similar problems independently.” This philosophy is reflected in his teaching style and community involvement, where he prioritizes knowledge transfer over simply providing answers.

In essence, Dr. Minh’s combination of technical excellence, emotional intelligence, creative thinking, and altruistic motivation makes him an exemplary problem-solver whose approach I continuously strive to emulate in my own life.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Effortless coherent speech với sophisticated cohesive devices, develops topics fully và appropriately
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Precise và sophisticated lexical choices với natural idioms (sets him apart, uncanny ability, out-of-the-box), rare vocabulary used naturally
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range của structures used naturally và accurately, error-free với sophisticated constructions
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Native-like với full range của pronunciation features, effortless to understand

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói flow một cách tự nhiên không có hesitation, với transitions mượt mà giữa các ideas. Các discourse markers được sử dụng tinh tế (What I find most remarkable, Moreover, In essence) không mechanical.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• “uncanny ability” thay vì “very good at” – sophisticated và expressive hơn
• “spearheaded an initiative” thay vì “started a project” – professional và precise
• “facilitates more effective decision-making” – abstract noun phrase showing high-level language
• “empowered to challenge” – academic register appropriate for discussing concepts

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Complex sentence: “Unlike those who seek quick fixes, Dr. Minh always considers the broader implications of his solutions.”
• Relative clause: “…which facilitates more effective decision-making”
• Participle clause: “…fostering an environment where they feel empowered…”
• Inversion cho emphasis: “What resonates with me most deeply is…”

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Không chỉ miêu tả “what” mà còn phân tích “why” và “how” với multiple layers:

• Medical expertise + community involvement (versatility)
• Technical skills + emotional intelligence (holistic approach)
• Short-term solutions + long-term thinking (strategic mindset)
• Personal success + empowering others (leadership philosophy)

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Question 1: Would you like to develop problem-solving skills like this person?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, definitely. I think problem-solving is a very useful skill in both work and daily life. I’m trying to learn from him by paying attention to how he approaches different situations.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Absolutely. I’m consciously working towards developing similar capabilities, particularly his methodical yet creative approach. I’ve started deliberately exposing myself to challenging situations and reflecting on the decision-making processes involved, which I believe will help me cultivate these skills over time.”

---

Question 2: Do you think you’ll be as good as this person one day?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“I hope so, but it will take a lot of time and practice. He has much more experience than me, so I need to work hard and learn more.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“That’s certainly an aspirational goal, though I recognize that his level of expertise is the result of decades of experience and continuous learning. What I find encouraging is that many of his skills – like emotional intelligence and systematic thinking – are developable through conscious effort. So while I may not replicate his exact prowess, I’m confident I can progressively enhance my own problem-solving capabilities.”

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút và là phần khó nhất trong IELTS Speaking. Đây là lúc giám khảo đánh giá khả năng thảo luận các vấn đề trừu tượng, phân tích sâu và đưa ra quan điểm có lý lẽ của bạn.

Yêu cầu chính:

• Phân tích, so sánh, đánh giá thay vì chỉ miêu tả
• Đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân có supporting arguments
• Xem xét nhiều góc độ của vấn đề (both sides)
• Sử dụng examples từ society chứ không chỉ personal experiences

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời thành 3-5 câu với structure rõ ràng
• Sử dụng discourse markers để organize ideas (Well, Actually, On the one hand…)
• Đưa ra evidence hoặc examples từ xã hội, nghiên cứu, hoặc common knowledge
• Thừa nhận complexity của issues (It depends on…, While… it’s also true that…)
• Không sợ acknowledge limitations trong hiểu biết của mình

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn gọn, thiếu elaboration và depth
• Không đưa ra reasoning rõ ràng cho opinions
• Thiếu vocabulary trừu tượng để discuss concepts
• Không balance different perspectives
• Speaking như đang viết essay (quá formal/academic)

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Problem-Solving in Education and Workplace

Question 1: Why is problem-solving considered an important skill in the workplace today?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause/Reason question – yêu cầu giải thích “tại sao”
• Key words: important skill, workplace, today (nhấn mạnh context hiện đại)
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • Direct answer: State rõ tầm quan trọng
  • Reason 1 + example/explanation
  • Reason 2 + example/explanation
  • Optional conclusion/broader implication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Problem-solving is very important in the workplace because companies face many challenges every day. Employees who can find solutions quickly are more valuable to their employers. For example, if a machine breaks down in a factory, workers with good problem-solving skills can fix it faster, which saves time and money. Also, modern jobs are becoming more complex, so people need to think creatively to handle new situations.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có clear answer và 2 reasons với example
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng basic (very important, find solutions, fix, think creatively)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses question adequately nhưng lacks sophistication trong language và depth trong analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Well, I’d argue that problem-solving has become paramount in contemporary workplaces for several interconnected reasons.

Firstly, we’re living in an era of unprecedented complexity where businesses face multifaceted challenges – from technological disruptions to global supply chain uncertainties. Employees who can navigate these ambiguities and devise innovative solutions are essentially keeping organizations competitive. Unlike routine tasks that can be automated or outsourced, nuanced problem-solving requires human judgment and adaptability, making it an irreplaceable competency.

Secondly, the pace of change in most industries has accelerated dramatically. What worked yesterday might be obsolete today, so organizations need team members who can rapidly assess new situations and pivot strategies accordingly. For instance, during the pandemic, companies that had agile problem-solvers were able to transition to remote operations smoothly, while others struggled with the adaptation.

Moreover, there’s a growing emphasis on collaborative problem-solving rather than hierarchical decision-making. Modern workplaces value employees who can work cross-functionally, synthesize diverse perspectives, and co-create solutions – skills that are fundamentally rooted in strong problem-solving capabilities.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized with clear signposting (Firstly, Secondly, Moreover) và logical flow từ individual importance → organizational impact → broader trends
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (paramount, multifaceted challenges, navigate ambiguities, irreplaceable competency, pivot strategies, synthesize perspectives)
• Grammar: Complex structures including:
  • Relative clauses: “companies that had agile problem-solvers”
  • Conditional structures: implied trong “What worked yesterday might be obsolete today”
  • Participle clauses: “making it an irreplaceable competency”
• Critical Thinking: Shows deep understanding với multiple layers (technological context, pace of change, organizational culture shift), specific example (pandemic), acknowledges complexity

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, Firstly, Secondly, Moreover, For instance, Unlike
• Tentative language: I’d argue, essentially, might be (shows sophisticated hedging)
• Abstract nouns: complexity, ambiguities, adaptability, competency, emphasis
• Collocations: unprecedented complexity, devise innovative solutions, accelerated dramatically, transition smoothly

---

Question 2: Should schools focus more on teaching students how to solve problems rather than memorizing facts?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion question với implicit comparison (problem-solving vs memorization)
• Key words: schools, focus more, teaching, solve problems vs memorizing facts
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • State your position (Yes/No/Balanced view)
  • Acknowledge value của problem-solving education
  • Consider role của factual knowledge
  • Suggest balanced approach nếu appropriate

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think schools should teach both problem-solving and memorizing facts because they are both important. Students need to know basic facts to understand subjects, but they also need to learn how to use that knowledge to solve problems. For example, in math class, students should memorize formulas but also practice using them in different situations. So I believe a balanced approach is best.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Has clear position (balanced) với basic reasoning
• Vocabulary: Simple và repetitive (both important, need to know, learn how to use)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Answers question appropriately nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is quite a nuanced question, and I’d say the answer lies somewhere in the middle. While I absolutely agree that problem-solving skills should be prioritized in modern education, I don’t think we should completely dismiss the value of foundational knowledge.

On the one hand, rote memorization without understanding has limited utility in today’s information-rich world where facts are readily accessible via search engines. What’s far more valuable is cultivating students’ ability to analyze information critically, identify patterns, and apply knowledge creatively to novel situations. For instance, instead of simply memorizing historical dates, students benefit more from understanding cause-and-effect relationships in history and drawing parallels to contemporary issues.

However, I’d argue that a certain baseline of factual knowledge is necessary as intellectual scaffolding for effective problem-solving. You can’t really engage in sophisticated scientific problem-solving without understanding fundamental principles, or tackle complex mathematical challenges without mastering basic operations. The key is how facts are taught – they should be presented as tools for thinking rather than ends in themselves.

Ideally, educational systems should strike a balance by embedding factual learning within problem-based pedagogies. This means using real-world scenarios where students need to retrieve and apply knowledge to solve problems, which reinforces both retention and practical application. Progressive education systems in countries like Finland have demonstrated that this integrated approach yields superior outcomes in terms of both knowledge acquisition and problem-solving competency.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated với clear thesis (balanced view), acknowledges both sides, provides concrete example, offers solution
• Vocabulary: Advanced và precise (nuanced question, rote memorization, limited utility, intellectual scaffolding, problem-based pedagogies, yields superior outcomes)
• Grammar: Complex với variety:
  • Conditional: “You can’t really engage… without understanding…”
  • Passive: “should be presented as”
  • Modal verbs for suggestions: “should strike a balance”
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates ability to see complexity, acknowledge different perspectives, propose synthesis, reference real-world evidence (Finland education system)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: On the one hand, However, Ideally, For instance
• Tentative language: I’d say, I’d argue, quite a nuanced question (appropriate hedging)
• Abstract vocabulary: utility, scaffolding, pedagogies, retention, acquisition, competency
• Academic tone: Progressive education systems, yields superior outcomes, embedded within

IELTS Speaking Part 3 thảo luận về giáo dục kỹ năng giải quyết vấn đề

Theme 2: Problem-Solving and Technology

Question 1: Has technology made it easier or harder for people to solve problems?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare/Evaluate question với binary choice (easier vs harder)
• Key words: technology, easier or harder, solve problems
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • Acknowledge complexity (both easier and harder in different ways)
  • Explain how technology helps problem-solving
  • Discuss potential drawbacks
  • Provide balanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think technology has made it easier to solve problems in many ways. For example, we can search for information online very quickly when we face a problem. Also, we have many apps and tools that help us organize our work and communicate with others. However, technology also creates new problems, like cybersecurity issues. So overall, I believe technology is helpful but we need to use it wisely.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Acknowledges both sides briefly với basic examples
• Vocabulary: Simple (made it easier, search for information, helpful, use wisely)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses both aspects nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“I’d say technology has had a paradoxical effect on problem-solving – it’s simultaneously made certain aspects easier while introducing entirely new layers of complexity.

On the positive side, technology has democratized access to information and tools that were once the exclusive domain of experts. AI-powered diagnostic tools, for instance, enable healthcare workers in remote areas to identify medical conditions with accuracy that would have required specialist consultation previously. Similarly, collaborative platforms allow geographically dispersed teams to tackle complex projects by leveraging diverse expertise, something that would have been logistically prohibitive in the pre-digital era.

However, there’s a flip side to this convenience. Technology has created what some researchers call “cognitive offloading” – we’ve become so reliant on digital tools that our intrinsic problem-solving capabilities might be atrophying. When GPS navigates for us, we lose our sense of direction; when calculators compute instantly, our mental arithmetic suffers. There’s also the issue of information overload – having access to vast amounts of data doesn’t automatically translate to better problem-solving if we lack the critical thinking skills to filter, evaluate, and synthesize that information effectively.

Moreover, technology itself has spawned entirely new categories of problems – cybersecurity threats, algorithm bias, digital addiction – that require sophisticated technological literacy to address. In this sense, we’re in a sort of arms race where technology both enables solutions and generates challenges.

Ultimately, I believe technology is a double-edged sword. It’s made problem-solving more efficient in many domains, but it’s also shifted the nature of competency required. Success now depends not just on accessing technological tools, but on maintaining our fundamental cognitive skills while judiciously leveraging digital resources – essentially augmenting rather than replacing human problem-solving capacity.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-organized với clear thesis (paradoxical effect), explores advantages, disadvantages, new types of problems, và synthesized conclusion
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (paradoxical effect, democratized access, cognitive offloading, atrophying, information overload, spawned, double-edged sword, judiciously leveraging, augmenting)
• Grammar: Full range của complex structures:
  • Participial phrases: “having access to vast amounts of data”
  • Relative clauses: “tools that were once the exclusive domain”
  • Conditional implications: “doesn’t automatically translate to”
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates high-level analysis với multiple perspectives, uses research terminology (cognitive offloading), considers both direct effects và meta-level implications, proposes nuanced conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: On the positive side, However, Moreover, Ultimately, Similarly
• Hedging/Academic language: I’d say, might be, some researchers call, In this sense
• Metaphors: double-edged sword, arms race, flip side
• Technical vocabulary: AI-powered, algorithm bias, digital literacy, cognitive offloading

---

Question 2: Do you think people rely too much on technology to solve their problems nowadays?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion question về over-reliance
• Key words: rely too much, technology, solve problems, nowadays
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • State position (yes/no/depends)
  • Provide evidence hoặc examples
  • Consider different contexts
  • Discuss implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think many people rely too much on technology. For example, students always use Google to find answers instead of thinking by themselves. This can make them lazy and unable to solve problems without technology. However, technology is also very useful in many situations, so we shouldn’t avoid it completely. People just need to find a good balance.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position với basic supporting point và qualification
• Vocabulary: Simple (rely too much, find answers, make them lazy, find a good balance)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Gets point across nhưng lacks sophistication và depth

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“I think the question of whether people rely excessively on technology really depends on the context and the nature of the problems in question.

In certain domains, what might appear as over-reliance could actually be strategic delegation of routine cognitive tasks. For instance, using spell-checkers or grammar tools frees up mental resources to focus on higher-order thinking like argumentation and creative expression. Similarly, using project management software to track deadlines allows professionals to concentrate on strategic planning rather than administrative minutiae. In these cases, technology is serving as a cognitive amplifier rather than a crutch.

However, I do think there are legitimate concerns about dependency in areas that affect fundamental capabilities. When people can’t navigate without GPS, perform basic calculations without apps, or solve interpersonal conflicts without mediating through social media platforms, we’re potentially eroding essential skills. There’s a particularly troubling trend among younger generations who turn to online forums for advice on relatively straightforward problems they could solve through basic critical thinking or trial and error.

What’s more concerning is the diminishing tolerance for ambiguity. Because technology often provides instant answers, people are becoming less comfortable with the uncertain, iterative process that characterizes complex problem-solving. This could have long-term implications for innovation and adaptive capacity, which thrive on the ability to sit with problems and explore multiple solutions.

That said, I don’t think the solution is retreating from technology. Rather, we need to cultivate digital wisdom – understanding when technology enhances our problem-solving and when it undermines it. This requires metacognitive awareness about our cognitive processes and deliberate practice in maintaining core competencies even as we leverage digital tools. Educational systems and workplace cultures have a crucial role to play in fostering this balance.”

Phán tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated argument structure: acknowledges complexity → presents strategic uses → discusses legitimate concerns → deeper implications → proposes solution
• Vocabulary: Advanced và precise (excessive reliance, strategic delegation, cognitive amplifier, legitimate concerns, eroding essential skills, diminishing tolerance for ambiguity, metacognitive awareness, digital wisdom)
• Grammar: Full range including:
  • Complex conditionals: “when people can’t navigate…”
  • Participial phrases: “understanding when technology enhances…”
  • Relative clauses: “which thrive on the ability…”
• Critical Thinking: Exceptional depth với multiple analytical layers, distinguishes between contexts, considers psychological implications (tolerance for ambiguity), proposes constructive solution rather than simple yes/no

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: In certain domains, However, What’s more concerning, That said, Rather
• Hedging: I think, might appear as, could actually be, potentially
• Academic collocations: legitimate concerns, long-term implications, crucial role, deliberate practice
• Abstract concepts: cognitive amplifier, digital wisdom, metacognitive awareness, adaptive capacity

Theme 3: Leadership and Problem-Solving

Question: What qualities make a good leader in terms of problem-solving?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Qualities/Characteristics question
• Key words: qualities, good leader, problem-solving
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • Identify 2-3 key qualities
  • Explain each với reasoning và examples
  • Connect qualities to effective problem-solving outcomes

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think good leaders need several qualities for problem-solving. First, they should be calm and not panic when problems happen. This helps them think clearly and make better decisions. Second, they need to be creative to find different solutions. Third, good leaders should listen to other people’s ideas because sometimes team members have good suggestions. Finally, they should be confident and able to make decisions quickly when necessary.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists qualities với brief explanations
• Vocabulary: Basic adjectives (calm, creative, confident) và simple verbs
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers key points adequately nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

“I’d say effective problem-solving leadership requires a sophisticated blend of cognitive, emotional, and interpersonal competencies.

Foremost among these is what I’d call diagnostic acumen – the ability to accurately identify the root cause of problems rather than just addressing surface symptoms. Strong leaders distinguish between what’s urgent and what’s important, and they can penetrate through the noise to understand the underlying dynamics at play. This requires both analytical rigor and intuitive sense, as problems in organizational contexts are rarely purely technical – they often involve complex human factors.

Equally crucial is emotional regulation under pressure. When crises emerge, teams naturally look to leaders for cues about how to respond. Leaders who can maintain composure, project confidence (even while acknowledging uncertainty), and manage their own stress create an environment where others can think clearly rather than react defensively. This isn’t about suppressing emotions but about channeling them productively – for instance, transforming anxiety into focused energy.

Another indispensable quality is what researchers call cognitive flexibility – the capacity to hold multiple perspectives simultaneously, challenge one’s own assumptions, and pivot strategies when evidence suggests current approaches aren’t working. The best problem-solving leaders don’t marry themselves to initial solutions; they remain open to new information and willing to change course. This requires a certain intellectual humility that’s often undervalued in leadership discourse.

I’d also emphasize collaborative intelligence – the skill of harnessing collective wisdom rather than relying solely on individual brilliance. Exceptional leaders create psychological safety where team members feel empowered to voice concerns, propose unorthodox ideas, and even challenge leadership decisions. They recognize that diverse perspectives often yield more robust solutions than homogeneous thinking, and they actively cultivate that diversity.

Finally, there’s the strategic vision to see beyond immediate problem resolution toward systemic improvement. Rather than just putting out fires, effective leaders ask “What can we learn from this?” and “How can we prevent similar issues or build resilience against future challenges?” This forward-thinking orientation transforms problems from crises into opportunities for organizational growth.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-organized với clear topic sentences, detailed explanations, và smooth transitions between qualities
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (diagnostic acumen, emotional regulation, cognitive flexibility, psychological safety, systemic improvement, homogeneous thinking, intellectual humility)
• Grammar: Full sophisticated range:
  • Relative clauses: “where team members feel empowered…”
  • Gerund phrases: “the skill of harnessing collective wisdom”
  • Parallel structures: “not just putting out fires… but transforming problems…”
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates exceptional depth với academic references (researchers call, leadership discourse), distinguishes between related concepts (urgent vs important, technical vs human factors), provides nuanced analysis của each quality

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Foremost among these, Equally crucial, Another indispensable quality, I’d also emphasize, Finally
• Academic language: I’d say, what I’d call, what researchers call, cognitive/emotional/interpersonal competencies
• Abstract nouns: acumen, rigor, humility, resilience, orientation
• Sophisticated collocations: root cause, surface symptoms, underlying dynamics, intellectual humility, psychological safety, systemic improvement

Thảo luận IELTS Speaking Part 3 về lãnh đạo và giải quyết vấn đề

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
analytical thinking	n. phrase	/ˌænəˈlɪtɪkəl ˈθɪŋkɪŋ/	tư duy phân tích	He approaches every challenge with analytical thinking.	strong analytical thinking, develop analytical thinking, apply analytical thinking
tackle a problem	v. phrase	/ˈtækl ə ˈprɒbləm/	giải quyết vấn đề	She knows how to tackle complex problems systematically.	tackle effectively, tackle head-on, tackle immediately, tackle successfully
resourceful	adj.	/rɪˈsɔːsfəl/	tháo vát, khéo léo	My mentor is incredibly resourceful when facing constraints.	highly resourceful, remarkably resourceful, naturally resourceful
methodical approach	n. phrase	/məˈθɒdɪkəl əˈprəʊtʃ/	cách tiếp cận có phương pháp	His methodical approach ensures no details are overlooked.	take a methodical approach, adopt a methodical approach, systematic and methodical approach
think outside the box	idiom	/θɪŋk ˌaʊtˈsaɪd ðə bɒks/	suy nghĩ sáng tạo, phá vỡ틀	Good problem-solvers think outside the box.	encourage to think outside the box, ability to think outside the box
pragmatic	adj.	/præɡˈmætɪk/	thực tế, thực dụng	She takes a pragmatic approach to workplace issues.	pragmatic solution, pragmatic approach, pragmatic attitude
troubleshoot	v.	/ˈtrʌblʃuːt/	khắc phục sự cố	He can troubleshoot technical problems quickly.	troubleshoot effectively, troubleshoot efficiently, able to troubleshoot
strategic thinking	n. phrase	/strəˈtiːdʒɪk ˈθɪŋkɪŋ/	tư duy chiến lược	Strategic thinking helps anticipate future challenges.	demonstrate strategic thinking, develop strategic thinking, lack strategic thinking
quick-witted	adj.	/ˌkwɪk ˈwɪtɪd/	nhanh trí, lanh lợi	Quick-witted people excel in crisis situations.	remarkably quick-witted, naturally quick-witted
innovative solution	n. phrase	/ˈɪnəveɪtɪv səˈluːʃən/	giải pháp sáng tạo	They came up with an innovative solution nobody expected.	develop innovative solutions, propose innovative solutions, implement innovative solutions
level-headed	adj.	/ˌlevl ˈhedɪd/	bình tĩnh, điềm đạm	Level-headed leaders make better decisions under pressure.	remain level-headed, stay level-headed, remarkably level-headed
critical thinking	n. phrase	/ˈkrɪtɪkəl ˈθɪŋkɪŋ/	tư duy phản biện	Education should emphasize critical thinking skills.	develop critical thinking, promote critical thinking, lack critical thinking
versatile	adj.	/ˈvɜːsətaɪl/	đa năng, linh hoạt	She’s versatile in handling different types of problems.	remarkably versatile, highly versatile, incredibly versatile
navigate challenges	v. phrase	/ˈnævɪɡeɪt ˈtʃælɪndʒɪz/	vượt qua thách thức	Experienced leaders navigate challenges with confidence.	successfully navigate, skillfully navigate, ability to navigate
cognitive flexibility	n. phrase	/ˈkɒɡnətɪv ˌfleksəˈbɪləti/	sự linh hoạt nhận thức	Cognitive flexibility is essential for complex problem-solving.	demonstrate cognitive flexibility, develop cognitive flexibility, high cognitive flexibility
diagnose the problem	v. phrase	/ˌdaɪəɡˈnəʊz ðə ˈprɒbləm/	chẩn đoán vấn đề	He can quickly diagnose the problem and find solutions.	accurately diagnose, properly diagnose, ability to diagnose
decisive	adj.	/dɪˈsaɪsɪv/	quyết đoán	Decisive leaders don’t hesitate when action is needed.	remarkably decisive, extremely decisive, highly decisive
holistic perspective	n. phrase	/həʊˈlɪstɪk pəˈspektɪv/	góc nhìn toàn diện	She takes a holistic perspective when analyzing problems.	adopt a holistic perspective, take a holistic perspective, lack a holistic perspective

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
hit the nail on the head	chỉ đúng vấn đề, nói đúng trọng tâm	When she identified the communication breakdown, she really hit the nail on the head.	7.5-8.5
nip it in the bud	ngăn chặn ngay từ đầu	Good problem-solvers nip potential issues in the bud.	7.5-8.5
think on one’s feet	suy nghĩ nhanh, ứng biến tốt	He can think on his feet even in unexpected situations.	7.5-8.5
get to the root of the problem	tìm ra nguyên nhân gốc rễ	She always gets to the root of the problem rather than treating symptoms.	7.5-8.5
a double-edged sword	con dao hai lưỡi (có cả mặt tốt và xấu)	Technology is a double-edged sword in problem-solving.	8.0-9.0
leave no stone unturned	không bỏ sót chi tiết nào	He leaves no stone unturned when investigating issues.	7.5-8.5
weigh the pros and cons	cân nhắc ưu nhược điểm	Effective problem-solvers carefully weigh the pros and cons.	7.0-8.0
back to the drawing board	quay lại bắt đầu từ đầu	When the first solution failed, they went back to the drawing board.	7.5-8.5
connect the dots	kết nối các mảnh ghép, nhìn ra bức tranh tổng thể	She’s excellent at connecting the dots between seemingly unrelated issues.	8.0-9.0
put out fires	giải quyết các vấn đề cấp bách	He spends most of his day putting out fires rather than strategic planning.	7.5-8.5
trial and error	thử và sai, học từ thất bại	Problem-solving often involves trial and error.	7.0-8.0
a blessing in disguise	điều xấu hóa tốt, may mắn ẩn giấu	That challenge turned out to be a blessing in disguise.	7.5-8.5

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Sử dụng khi cần một chút thời gian suy nghĩ: “Well, that’s an interesting question…”
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc điều chỉnh: “Actually, I think it depends on the situation…”
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi muốn nói thật hoặc thừa nhận điều gì: “To be honest, I’ve never really thought about that before, but…”
• 📝 I’d say that… – Cách sophisticated để đưa ra quan điểm: “I’d say that problem-solving is crucial in modern workplaces.”
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Nhấn mạnh đây là quan điểm cá nhân: “From my perspective, experience matters more than natural talent.”

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, hơn nữa: “On top of that, she’s also very patient with team members.”
• 📝 What’s more,… – Ngoài ra: “What’s more, he can explain complex issues in simple terms.”
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến: “Not to mention his impressive track record of successful projects.”
• 📝 Besides,… – Bên cạnh đó: “Besides, technology has made collaboration much easier.”
• 📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó (formal): “Additionally, good leaders inspire their teams.”

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác: “On the one hand, technology helps. On the other hand, it creates dependency.”
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng cần xét: “While it’s true that experience helps, natural talent also plays a role.”
• 📝 Having said that,… – Nói như vậy thì (để đưa ra contrast): “Having said that, not everyone has access to quality education.”
• 📝 That said,… – Tuy nhiên (sophisticated): “That said, technology isn’t a complete solution.”

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, nhìn chung: “All in all, problem-solving is a learnable skill.”
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, xét cho cùng: “At the end of the day, experience matters most.”
• 📝 In a nutshell,… – Tóm gọn lại: “In a nutshell, good problem-solvers are valuable assets.”
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng (formal): “Ultimately, it depends on individual circumstances.”

Để đưa ra ví dụ:

• 📝 For instance,… – Ví dụ như: “For instance, my manager always stays calm during crises.”
• 📝 Take… for example – Lấy… làm ví dụ: “Take Steve Jobs, for example – he was known for innovative problem-solving.”
• 📝 A case in point is… – Một trường hợp điển hình là: “A case in point is how Singapore handled the pandemic.”

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

• Mixed conditional: Kết hợp quá khứ và hiện tại để show causation

  • Formula: If + past perfect, would + base verb
  • Ví dụ: “If she hadn’t developed strong problem-solving skills early on, she wouldn’t be such an effective leader today.”

• Inversion for emphasis: Đảo ngữ để nhấn mạnh (formal, impressive)

  • Formula: Had + S + past participle, S + would have…
  • Ví dụ: “Had he not remained calm, the situation could have escalated.”
  • Formula: Should + S + base verb, S + will…
  • Ví dụ: “Should any problems arise, he knows exactly how to handle them.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

• Non-defining relative clauses: Thêm thông tin không thiết yếu (sophisticated)

  • Ví dụ: “Dr. Minh, who has over 20 years of experience, approaches problems methodically.”
  • Ví dụ: “This approach, which emphasizes collaboration, tends to yield better results.”

• Reduced relative clauses:

  • Ví dụ: “People possessing strong analytical skills often excel at problem-solving.” (instead of “who possess”)

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

• Impersonal passive: Dùng để generalize hoặc sound academic
  • It is thought/believed/said that…
  • Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that problem-solving skills can be developed through practice.”
  • It has been shown/proven/demonstrated that…
  • Ví dụ: “It has been demonstrated that diverse teams solve problems more effectively.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

• What-cleft: Nhấn mạnh object hoặc action

  • What I find most… is…
  • Ví dụ: “What I find most impressive about her is her ability to remain calm under pressure.”
  • What really matters is…
  • Ví dụ: “What really matters in problem-solving is not just intelligence but persistence.”

• It-cleft: Nhấn mạnh specific element

  • It’s … that…
  • Ví dụ: “It’s his creative thinking that sets him apart from others.”

5. Participle Clauses:

• Present participle (-ing): Show simultaneous actions hoặc cause
  • Ví dụ: “Having faced numerous challenges, she developed exceptional problem-solving skills.”
  • Ví dụ: “Recognizing the urgency, he immediately assembled a crisis team.”

6. Inversion After Negative Adverbials:

• Ví dụ: “Never have I seen someone solve problems so efficiently.”
• Ví dụ: “Rarely do we encounter such innovative thinking.”
• Ví dụ: “Not only does he identify problems quickly, but he also implements solutions effectively.”

7. Subjunctive Mood:

• It’s important/essential/crucial that + S + base verb
  • Ví dụ: “It’s essential that leaders remain composed during crises.”
  • Ví dụ: “I suggest that companies invest more in problem-solving training.”

Chiến Lược Đặc Biệt Từ Examiner

Chiến Lược Timing và Structure

Part 1 Timing Tips:

• Mỗi câu trả lời nên kéo dài 15-20 giây (2-3 câu)
• Không nói quá ngắn (Yes/No only) cũng không quá dài (over 30 seconds)
• Structure đơn giản: Direct answer → Reason/Example → Optional elaboration

Part 2 Note-taking Strategy:
Trong 1 phút chuẩn bị, ghi chú theo format:

Who: [name + relationship + age/profession]
How know: [context + time]
What problems: [type 1], [type 2], [type 3]
Why good: 
  - Quality 1 → example
  - Quality 2 → example
  - Impact/feeling

Part 3 Extension Technique:
Mỗi câu trả lời Part 3 nên follow công thức PREP:

• Point: State your position
• Reason: Explain why
• Example: Give evidence/illustration
• Point: Restate or conclude

Common Mistakes của Học Viên Việt Nam và Cách Khắc Phục

Lỗi 1: Trả lời quá ngắn gọn

• ❌ “Yes, I do.” (Dừng ở đó)
• ✅ “Yes, I do. I consider myself reasonably good at solving everyday problems, though it really depends on the nature of the challenge. For instance, I’m quite adept at troubleshooting technical issues…”

Lỗi 2: Sử dụng vocabulary quá academic/bookish không tự nhiên

• ❌ “He demonstrates commendable acumen in resolving predicaments.” (Nghe như đọc sách)
• ✅ “He’s exceptionally good at figuring out complex problems.” (Natural spoken English)

Lỗi 3: Không mở rộng câu “explain” trong Part 2

• ❌ Nói về “Who, How, What” rất chi tiết nhưng chỉ dành 15 giây cho “Why”
• ✅ Phân bổ: Who (20%), How (15%), What (20%), Why (45%)

Lỗi 4: Thiếu discourse markers

• ❌ Nói liên tục không có “Well,” “Actually,” “On the other hand”
• ✅ Sử dụng markers tự nhiên để organize ideas và gain thinking time

Lỗi 5: Speak như đang viết essay

• ❌ “In conclusion, problem-solving constitutes an indispensable competency…” (Quá formal)
• ✅ “So yeah, I’d say problem-solving is really crucial these days…” (Conversational)

Lỗi 6: Không acknowledge complexity trong Part 3

• ❌ “Yes, technology always makes problem-solving easier.” (Too absolute)
• ✅ “Well, it’s a bit more nuanced than that. While technology certainly helps in many ways, it also…” (Sophisticated thinking)

Tips Để Đạt Band 8+

1. Demonstrate Range:

• Không lặp lại cùng một từ nhiều lần
• Paraphrase câu hỏi của examiner trong câu trả lời
• Vary sentence structures (simple, compound, complex)

2. Show Critical Thinking:

• Acknowledge different perspectives: “Some people argue… while others believe…”
• Qualify statements: “To some extent…”, “In certain contexts…”
• Consider implications: “This could lead to…”, “The long-term effect might be…”

3. Use Examples Effectively:

• Part 1: Personal examples (ngắn gọn)
• Part 2: Detailed personal story (specific)
• Part 3: Societal examples, research, trends (broader)

4. Maintain Natural Fluency:

• Sử dụng fillers tự nhiên: “you know,” “I mean,” “kind of” (moderate use)
• Self-correction naturally: “He’s very… well, actually, I’d say he’s exceptionally skilled…”
• Không sợ pause briefly để think (1-2 giây là OK)

5. Pronunciation Matters:

• Word stress: “ANalytical” not “analyTIcal”
• Sentence stress: Nhấn vào content words
• Intonation: Rise để show uncertainty, fall để conclude
• Linking: “good_at”, “think_outside”

Lộ Trình Chuẩn Bị 4 Tuần

Tuần 1: Foundation

• Học vocabulary theo theme (15-20 từ mỗi ngày)
• Practice trả lời Part 1 questions (8-10 questions/day)
• Record yourself và listen lại để identify issues

Tuần 2: Part 2 Mastery

• Practice 2 cue cards mỗi ngày
• Time yourself strictly (1 min prep, 2 min talk)
• Focus on covering all bullet points đầy đủ

Tuần 3: Part 3 Depth

• Practice abstract questions với PREP structure
• Develop opinions on các topics phổ biến
• Practice hedging và showing balanced views

Tuần 4: Mock Tests & Refinement

• Full mock tests (3-4 lần)
• Get feedback từ teacher hoặc native speaker
• Fine-tune pronunciation và reduce fillers

Chiến lược cải thiện band điểm IELTS Speaking từ examiner

Những Điều Cần Nhớ Từ Examiner

Với hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm chấm thi IELTS Speaking, tôi muốn nhấn mạnh những điểm sau:

1. Authenticity Wins Over Perfection:
Giám khảo đánh giá cao sự tự nhiên hơn là câu trả lời “perfect” nhưng mechanical. Đừng cố gắng sound like a textbook. Hãy là chính bạn, nhưng bản best version của bạn.

2. It’s a Conversation, Not an Interrogation:
IELTS Speaking là cuộc trò chuyện hai chiều. Maintain eye contact, show interest, respond naturally. Một số thí sinh treat nó như exam questions và tạo ra stiff atmosphere.

3. Band 8-9 Isn’t About Zero Mistakes:
Native speakers cũng make mistakes khi nói. Band cao là về overall impression – fluency, range, và ability to communicate complex ideas effectively. Một vài grammar slips won’t destroy your band nếu overall performance xuất sắc.

4. Vocabulary Trong Context:
Đừng cố nhét advanced vocabulary không phù hợp. Một từ “simple” nhưng chính xác tốt hơn một từ “advanced” dùng sai context. Ví dụ: “tackle a problem” (natural) tốt hơn “ameliorate a predicament” (trying too hard).

5. Opinions Matter More Than “Right Answers”:
Không có “correct answer” trong IELTS Speaking. Examiner không care về opinion của bạn, chỉ care về how bạn express và justify nó. Bạn có thể disagree với popular views – miễn là articulate reasoning tốt.

6. Preparation ≠ Memorization:
Chuẩn bị ideas và vocabulary là tốt. Memorize whole answers là disaster. Examiners are trained để nhận diện memorized responses và sẽ penalize hoặc redirect để break your script.

Chủ đề “Describe a person who is very good at problem-solving” là cơ hội tuyệt vời để showcase language abilities của bạn. Với preparation đúng cách, vocabulary phong phú, và examples cụ thể, bạn hoàn toàn có thể đạt band điểm mục tiêu. Remember: Practice makes progress. Good luck với IELTS Speaking test của bạn!