IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề Describe a Person Who Is Very Inspiring – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề về những con người truyền cảm hứng là một trong những đề tài phổ biến và quan trọng nhất trong IELTS Speaking. Đây không chỉ là cơ hội để bạn chia sẻ về những người có ảnh hưởng tích cực đến cuộc sống mình, mà còn là dịp để thể hiện khả năng sử dụng ngôn ngữ mô tả tính cách, thành tựu và tác động của một người đối với xã hội.

Theo thống kê từ các trung tâm thi IELTS và nguồn ielts-blog.com, chủ đề “Describe A Person Who Is Very Inspiring” xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong các kỳ thi từ năm 2020 đến 2024, đặc biệt trong quý 1 và quý 3 hàng năm. Khả năng xuất hiện của chủ đề này trong tương lai được đánh giá ở mức cao do tính universal và khả năng mở rộng ý tốt.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ được trang bị đầy đủ những gì cần thiết để tự tin xử lý chủ đề này ở mọi band điểm. Bài viết bao gồm câu hỏi thực tế cho cả 3 Part, bài mẫu chi tiết theo từng band điểm từ 6-7, 7.5-8 đến 8.5-9, phân tích sâu về những yếu tố tạo nên sự khác biệt giữa các band, và kho từ vựng phong phú kèm cách sử dụng. Đặc biệt, tôi sẽ chia sẻ những lời khuyên từ góc nhìn examiner về những lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục hiệu quả.

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 là phần mở đầu của bài thi Speaking, kéo dài khoảng 4-5 phút. Đây là phần warm-up giúp bạn làm quen với examiner và môi trường thi. Các câu hỏi thường xoay quanh cuộc sống hàng ngày, sở thích cá nhân, gia đình, công việc hay học tập.

Chiến lược quan trọng nhất cho Part 1 là trả lời tự nhiên nhưng có structure rõ ràng. Mỗi câu trả lời nên có 2-3 câu, bao gồm câu trả lời trực tiếp, lý do hoặc giải thích, và một ví dụ cụ thể nếu có thể. Đừng chỉ trả lời Yes/No hoặc câu đơn giản vì điều này sẽ khiến band điểm của bạn bị giới hạn.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 1 bao gồm việc trả lời quá ngắn gọn, sử dụng từ vựng đơn điệu và lặp lại, thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân, và có xu hướng học thuộc câu trả lời khiến giọng điệu không tự nhiên. Examiner có thể dễ dàng nhận ra điều này và sẽ đánh giá thấp hơn về Fluency and Coherence.

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you have anyone you consider inspiring in your life?

Question 2: What kind of people do you find inspiring?

Question 3: Did you have any role models when you were younger?

Question 4: Do you think it’s important for young people to have inspiring figures?

Question 5: Who do most people in your country find inspiring?

Question 6: How do inspiring people influence society?

Question 7: Have you ever tried to follow the example of someone inspiring?

Question 8: Do you prefer to be inspired by real people or fictional characters?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you have anyone you consider inspiring in your life?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có hay không
• Nêu rõ người đó là ai
• Đưa ra lý do ngắn gọn tại sao họ inspiring

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I do. My older sister is very inspiring to me. She works hard and always helps other people. She teaches me to be a better person every day.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, có nêu người cụ thể và lý do cơ bản
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng đơn giản (works hard, helps, better person), thiếu chi tiết cụ thể, cấu trúc câu đơn điệu
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời đáp ứng yêu cầu cơ bản nhưng thiếu depth và sophisticated language. Không có ví dụ cụ thể để minh họa.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Absolutely. I’d say my former teacher, Mrs. Lan, has been an incredibly inspiring figure in my life. What I find most admirable about her is not just her dedication to teaching, but her unwavering belief in every student’s potential. She has this remarkable ability to bring out the best in people, which has profoundly shaped my own approach to challenges.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng discourse marker tự nhiên (Absolutely, I’d say), từ vựng tinh vi và cụm từ collocation mạnh (incredibly inspiring figure, unwavering belief, remarkable ability, profoundly shaped). Cấu trúc câu đa dạng với relative clause và complex ideas. Câu trả lời có chiều sâu về cả tính cách lẫn tác động của người được nhắc đến.
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Thể hiện Fluency tốt với linking words mượt mà, Vocabulary range rộng với các collocations tự nhiên, Grammar đa dạng với cấu trúc complex, và Ideas có depth. Cách diễn đạt “what I find most admirable” và “has profoundly shaped” cho thấy khả năng sử dụng ngôn ngữ tinh tế để thể hiện ý tưởng phức tạp.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• incredibly inspiring figure: người cực kỳ truyền cảm hứng
• unwavering belief: niềm tin không lay chuyển
• bring out the best in people: làm nổi bật điểm tốt nhất trong mỗi người
• profoundly shaped: định hình sâu sắc

---

Question: What kind of people do you find inspiring?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu loại người bạn thấy inspiring (có thể 1-2 types)
• Giải thích qualities cụ thể
• Đưa ra ví dụ nếu có thể

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I find people who overcome difficulties inspiring. For example, people who are poor but work hard to be successful. They show us that we can achieve our goals if we try hard.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có structure: type of people → example → reason. Trả lời đúng trọng tâm câu hỏi.
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn basic (overcome difficulties, poor, work hard, try hard), ý tưởng chưa sâu sắc, thiếu specific examples
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response nhưng lacks sophistication. Cần varied vocabulary và more nuanced explanation.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’m particularly drawn to people who demonstrate resilience in the face of adversity. What really strikes me is not just their ability to bounce back from setbacks, but their capacity to maintain compassion and generosity even when going through tough times themselves. For instance, I’m always moved by stories of individuals who, despite facing financial hardship, still find ways to give back to their communities – that kind of selflessness is truly inspiring.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Discourse markers tự nhiên (I’m particularly drawn to, What really strikes me), vocabulary sophisticated (demonstrate resilience, adversity, bounce back from setbacks, compassion, facing financial hardship, give back to communities, selflessness). Cấu trúc phức tạp với multiple clauses. Ý tưởng có depth về emotional và moral dimension.
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates full range của band descriptors. Fluent với natural expressions, lexical resource excellent với precise word choice và collocations, grammar varied và accurate, ideas thoughtful và well-developed.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• demonstrate resilience: thể hiện sự kiên cường
• in the face of adversity: trước nghịch cảnh
• bounce back from setbacks: phục hồi sau thất bại
• give back to their communities: đóng góp lại cho cộng đồng
• selflessness: sự vị tha

---

Question: Did you have any role models when you were younger?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời Yes/No
• Nêu người cụ thể (hoặc giải thích tại sao không)
• Mô tả influence của họ lên bạn lúc nhỏ
• Sử dụng thì quá khứ vì đang nói về thời thơ ấu

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I did. When I was a child, I really admired my uncle. He was a doctor and he helped many poor people for free. I wanted to be like him because he was kind and helpful.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng đúng thì quá khứ, có person cụ thể và reason rõ ràng
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary simple (admired, kind, helpful), structure đơn giản, thiếu elaboration về specific impact
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates the message nhưng lacks complexity trong expression và ideas.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Definitely. Growing up, I looked up to my grandfather tremendously. He was a teacher in a remote rural area and what fascinated me as a child was his unwavering commitment to education despite the challenging circumstances. He would often go the extra mile – literally walking several kilometers to visit students who’d dropped out and persuade their families about the importance of schooling. His dedication taught me early on that making a real difference often requires going beyond what’s convenient or expected.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Natural opening (Definitely, Growing up), phrasal verbs appropriate cho spoken English (looked up to, go the extra mile, dropped out, going beyond), vocabulary rich và contextual (remote rural area, unwavering commitment, challenging circumstances, dedication). Complex sentence structures với multiple clauses. Personal reflection sâu sắc về life lesson learned.
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Exemplifies top band characteristics: naturally fluent, sophisticated vocabulary used precisely, complex grammar handled confidently, ideas thoughtful với clear personal connection.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• looked up to: ngưỡng mộ, tôn trọng
• remote rural area: vùng nông thôn xa xôi
• unwavering commitment: sự cam kết không lay chuyển
• go the extra mile: nỗ lực hơn mức bình thường
• making a real difference: tạo ra sự khác biệt thực sự

Tương tự như describe a time you helped someone with a problem, việc chia sẻ về những người truyền cảm hứng cũng đòi hỏi bạn phải mô tả rõ ràng hành động và tác động cụ thể của họ đối với người khác.

Học viên IELTS đang trả lời câu hỏi về người truyền cảm hứng trong Part 1 với giám khảo

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại của bài thi IELTS Speaking, kéo dài từ 3-4 phút tổng cộng, bao gồm 1 phút chuẩn bị và 2-3 phút nói không bị ngắt quãng. Đây được coi là phần challenging nhất vì bạn phải duy trì câu chuyện một mình trong thời gian dài.

Chiến lược quan trọng cho Part 2 bao gồm việc sử dụng tối đa 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi chú keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh. Bạn nên note down những từ vựng hay, cụm từ quan trọng, và outline ngắn gọn theo các bullet points trong đề bài. Mục tiêu là nói đủ 2 phút, tốt nhất là gần 3 phút để thể hiện stamina tốt.

Khi kể chuyện, bạn cần trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trong cue card. Examiner sẽ đánh giá thấp nếu bạn bỏ sót phần nào. Đặc biệt chú ý đến câu “And explain…” ở cuối vì đây là nơi bạn thể hiện opinion và deeper thinking, chiếm tỷ trọng điểm cao.

Lỗi phổ biến của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 2 là không tận dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị, nói không đủ thời gian (dưới 1.5 phút), sử dụng sai thì động từ (đặc biệt khi kể về quá khứ), và bỏ sót phần explain – phần quan trọng nhất. Nhiều bạn cũng có xu hướng học thuộc template và áp dụng cứng nhắc, khiến câu chuyện nghe không tự nhiên.

Cue Card

Describe a person who is very inspiring

You should say:

• Who this person is
• How you know this person
• What this person does
• And explain why you find this person inspiring

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person – đây là dạng đề yêu cầu mô tả về một người cụ thể, cần focus vào personal qualities, actions, và impact của người đó.

Thì động từ: Chủ yếu dùng thì hiện tại (Present Simple, Present Perfect) nếu người đó vẫn đang sống và có ảnh hưởng hiện tại. Có thể kết hợp quá khứ khi kể về specific stories hoặc moments bạn biết đến họ.

Bullet points phải cover:

• Bullet 1 (Who): Cần nêu rõ identity – họ là ai, nghề nghiệp, vai trò trong xã hội hoặc trong cuộc đời bạn
• Bullet 2 (How you know): Mô tả mối quan hệ hoặc cách bạn biết đến người này – trực tiếp quen biết, qua media, hay nghe kể
• Bullet 3 (What they do): Hành động, công việc, hoặc achievements cụ thể của họ – đây là phần substantial nhất
• Bullet 4 (Why inspiring): Explanation về qualities, values, hoặc impact mà họ mang lại – đây là critical part ghi điểm cao nhất

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần explain chiếm khoảng 40% giá trị của câu trả lời. Đây là nơi bạn demonstrate critical thinking, personal reflection, và ability to articulate complex ideas. Đừng chỉ nói “because they are kind” mà cần phân tích deeper về how và why their qualities matter, the impact they have, và what you’ve learned from them.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I would like to talk about my mother, who is very inspiring to me. She is 52 years old and works as a nurse at the local hospital in my hometown.

I have known her all my life because she is my mother. She raised me and my two brothers by herself after my father passed away when I was ten years old. It was a difficult time for our family, but she never gave up.

My mother works very hard every day. She usually works long shifts at the hospital, sometimes even during holidays and weekends. She takes care of many patients and always does her job with patience and care. Besides her work, she also makes sure we have everything we need at home. She cooks for us, helps us with our problems, and always supports our education.

I find my mother very inspiring for several reasons. First, she is very strong and determined. Even when life was hard after my father died, she worked two jobs to make sure we could go to school and have a good life. Second, she is very kind to everyone. She treats her patients like family and many people thank her for her help. Finally, she taught me important values like working hard and never giving up. When I face difficulties, I always think about my mother and how she overcame her challenges. This gives me strength to keep trying.

In conclusion, my mother is the most inspiring person I know. She showed me that with determination and hard work, we can overcome any difficulty in life.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có coherence tốt với clear sequencing (First, Second, Finally). Sử dụng basic linking words. Câu chuyện có beginning, middle, end rõ ràng. Tuy nhiên thiếu sophistication trong discourse markers và có một số hesitation khi transition giữa các ideas.
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng adequate và relevant (patience and care, strong and determined, working hard, never giving up, strength, determination). Có một số collocations đơn giản. Tuy nhiên vocabulary còn repetitive (very inspiring, very hard, very kind) và thiếu less common words.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Sử dụng mix của simple và complex sentences. Có relative clauses cơ bản (who is very inspiring). Past tense sử dụng chính xác khi kể về father. Tuy nhiên structures còn limited, thiếu variety như conditionals, passive voice, advanced tenses.
Pronunciation	6-7	Clear và dễ hiểu, word stress cơ bản chính xác. Sentence stress và intonation adequate nhưng có thể monotonous.

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points trong đề bài
• ✅ Story có structure rõ ràng và dễ follow
• ✅ Có personal connection mạnh, authentic và touching
• ✅ Sử dụng đúng thì động từ cho different timeframes

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary còn basic và repetitive, cần more variety
• ⚠️ Grammar structures đơn điệu, thiếu complex sentences
• ⚠️ Phần explain chưa đủ depth, cần more elaboration về impact và life lessons

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to talk about Dr. Nguyen Thi Lan, a remarkable pediatrician who I’ve had the privilege of knowing for the past five years. She’s someone who truly embodies the spirit of selfless dedication to helping others, particularly children from disadvantaged backgrounds.

I first came across Dr. Lan when I was volunteering at a charity clinic in my city. She was the head physician there, working entirely pro bono on her weekends. What immediately struck me was not just her exceptional medical expertise, but the way she connected with each child and their families. She treated them with such genuine warmth and respect, never making them feel like they were receiving charity.

What makes Dr. Lan particularly special is her holistic approach to healthcare. She doesn’t just treat illnesses – she goes above and beyond to address the underlying social issues that affect her patients’ health. For instance, she’s established a network of sponsors who help cover educational expenses for children from poor families, believing that education is crucial for breaking the cycle of poverty. She’s also been instrumental in setting up health education programs in rural schools, teaching children about nutrition and hygiene. Despite being in her sixties and having every reason to retire comfortably, she continues to work tirelessly, often putting in twelve-hour days.

The reason I find Dr. Lan so inspiring is multifaceted. Firstly, she’s a living example of how one person can make a tangible difference in countless lives. Through her work, hundreds of children have received medical care they otherwise couldn’t afford. Secondly, her approach to life challenges conventional thinking about success. In a society where wealth and status are often prioritized, she’s chosen a path of service, finding fulfillment in improving others’ lives rather than accumulating material possessions. What resonates with me most, though, is her belief that every child deserves equal opportunities, regardless of their economic background. This philosophy has profoundly influenced my own values and career aspirations. Whenever I feel discouraged or tempted to take the easy path, I think of Dr. Lan’s unwavering commitment and it reignites my motivation to contribute meaningfully to society.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Speaks fluently với minimal hesitation. Sophisticated discourse markers (What immediately struck me, For instance, Firstly, Secondly, What resonates with me most). Clear progression of ideas với smooth transitions. Coherent storytelling từ introduction đến conclusion.
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range vocabulary với precise usage (remarkable pediatrician, truly embodies, selfless dedication, disadvantaged backgrounds, exceptional medical expertise, holistic approach, instrumental in, breaking the cycle of poverty, tangible difference). Good use of collocations và less common phrases. Some idiomatic expressions (goes above and beyond, living example, unwavering commitment).
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Variety of complex structures: relative clauses (who I’ve had the privilege of knowing), participle clauses (believing that, teaching children), conditionals implied (they otherwise couldn’t afford), passive voice (has been instrumental). Mostly error-free với good control of tenses.
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear pronunciation với natural stress patterns. Good use of intonation for emphasis và maintaining listener interest. Pronunciation features không hinder understanding.

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“very inspiring”, “works hard”, “kind to everyone”	“truly embodies”, “selfless dedication”, “exceptional medical expertise”, “unwavering commitment”
Grammar	Simple: “She works very hard every day”	Complex: “Through her work, hundreds of children have received medical care they otherwise couldn’t afford”
Ideas	Basic explanation: “she taught me to work hard”	Deeper analysis: “challenges conventional thinking about success”, “profoundly influenced my own values and career aspirations”

Điểm mạnh bổ sung:

• ✅ Vocabulary range impressive với topic-specific terms và sophisticated expressions
• ✅ Grammar structures varied và handled confidently
• ✅ Ideas well-developed với clear explanations và personal reflection
• ✅ Natural flow với appropriate discourse markers
• ✅ Phần explain có depth với multiple layers of reasoning

Để đạt 8.5-9:

• Cần thêm idiomatic language và more sophisticated expressions
• Personal reflection có thể deeper về philosophical implications
• Có thể thêm contrasts hoặc nuances để show critical thinking

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to tell you about Professor Tran Van Minh, a pioneering marine biologist whose work I’ve been following for nearly a decade. He’s someone who epitomizes the perfect fusion of scientific excellence and grassroots environmental activism, and his influence has been nothing short of transformative, both professionally and personally for me.

I first became aware of Professor Tran when I attended one of his public lectures on coral reef conservation during my university years. What set him apart from other academics I’d encountered was his remarkable gift for making complex scientific concepts accessible without diluting their significance. He had this infectious enthusiasm that made you genuinely care about ecosystems you’d never even seen. After that lecture, I started following his research and eventually had the opportunity to work as a volunteer on one of his marine conservation projects in the Con Dao Islands, which cemented my respect for his work.

Now, what makes Professor Tran’s contributions particularly noteworthy isn’t merely his groundbreaking research on coral restoration – though that alone would be considerable. It’s the way he’s bridged the gap between academia and practical conservation. He’s developed cost-effective coral farming techniques that local fishing communities can actually implement, turning potential adversaries of conservation into its strongest advocates. Rather than adopting the typical top-down approach that many environmentalists favor, he’s empowered local communities to become stewards of their own marine resources. His model has been replicated in over fifteen coastal provinces across Vietnam, and it’s been fascinating to see how he’s essentially created a blueprint for community-driven conservation that other scientists are now studying.

But here’s what I find most inspiring: at 68, an age when most academics are content to rest on their laurels, he’s pushing boundaries more vigorously than ever. He spends weeks living in remote fishing villages, often under fairly spartan conditions, documenting how climate change is affecting traditional fishing practices. He’s leveraged social media in ways that would put many millennials to shame, creating viral content that’s raised awareness about ocean conservation among younger generations. And perhaps most impressively, he’s weathered considerable criticism from those who believe environmental protection comes at the expense of economic development, yet he’s never wavered in his conviction that the two can be complementary.

The reason Professor Tran resonates so deeply with me goes beyond admiration for his achievements. He’s challenged my preconceptions about what it means to make a meaningful contribution to society. I used to think that impact required operating on a grand scale – influencing policy at the national level or making headline-grabbing discoveries. But Professor Tran has shown me that lasting change often comes from patient, sustained effort at the community level, building trust and transferring knowledge in ways that empower others to carry the work forward. His approach runs counter to our society’s obsession with instant results and viral fame, yet it’s proven far more effective in the long run.

What strikes me most profoundly is his philosophy that scientists have a moral obligation not just to understand the world but to actively work towards its preservation, and to do so in ways that respect and include the people most affected by environmental changes. This worldview has fundamentally reshaped my career trajectory. I’m now pursuing environmental science myself, and I constantly ask myself: How can I bridge theory and practice? How can I make my work accessible and inclusive? These questions, inspired by Professor Tran’s example, have become my guiding principles.

In an era where cynicism about humanity’s future often feels justified, Professor Tran is a powerful reminder that dedicated individuals can indeed bend the arc towards positive change, one community, one reef, one person at a time.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Speaks fluently và effortlessly với virtually no hesitation. Sophisticated discourse markers và cohesive devices used naturally (What set him apart, Now what makes…particularly noteworthy, But here’s what I find most inspiring, The reason…goes beyond). Ideas develop logically với smooth progression và clear relationships between concepts. Shows ability to expand on points extensively without losing coherence.
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Exemplary vocabulary range với precise và sophisticated word choice (epitomizes, fusion, grassroots environmental activism, transformative, diluting their significance, infectious enthusiasm, cemented my respect, noteworthy, groundbreaking research, bridged the gap, stewards, replicated, content to rest on their laurels, leveraged, weathered considerable criticism, wavered, conviction). Natural use của idiomatic language (set him apart, pushing boundaries, put many millennials to shame, goes beyond, runs counter to, bend the arc). Collocations used precisely (cost-effective techniques, top-down approach, community-driven conservation, moral obligation).
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range của structures used naturally và accurately: complex conditionals, passive constructions, participle clauses, relative clauses, inversion (Yet he’s never wavered), cleft sentences (What strikes me most). Error-free performance với sophisticated structures handled confidently. Seamless mixing của tenses for narrative effect.
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Fully intelligible với natural pronunciation features. Effective use của intonation, stress patterns, và pausing for emphasis. Pronunciation enhances meaning và keeps listener engaged.

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Câu chuyện flows naturally như một conversation thực sự. Speaker demonstrates ability to maintain extended discourse without repetition hay self-correction. Transitions giữa ideas mượt mà với sophisticated signposting.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• Ví dụ: “epitomizes the perfect fusion” – sử dụng abstract nouns và verbs precisely để convey complex meaning economically
• “weathered considerable criticism” – metaphorical usage showing range
• “runs counter to our society’s obsession” – idiomatic và natural
• “bend the arc towards positive change” – figurative language showing native-like fluency

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Ví dụ: “Rather than adopting the typical top-down approach that many environmentalists favor, he’s empowered local communities to become stewards of their own marine resources” – complex sentence với comparative structure, relative clause, present perfect, và infinitive
• “Yet he’s never wavered in his conviction that the two can be complementary” – shows ability to use negative constructions naturally với embedded clause
• Mixing của tenses creates narrative depth: past (I first became aware), present perfect (I’ve been following), present (he spends weeks)

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Không chỉ mô tả what the person does mà phân tích deeper về philosophy và approach. Demonstrates critical thinking bằng cách contrast Professor Tran’s methods với conventional approaches. Shows personal growth và reflection. Makes broader connections về societal values và meaningful contribution.

Thí sinh IELTS đang trình bày bài nói Part 2 về người truyền cảm hứng với ghi chú chuẩn bị

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Sau khi bạn hoàn thành phần độc thoại 2 phút, examiner thường sẽ hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn để conclude Part 2 trước khi chuyển sang Part 3. Những câu này thường ngắn gọn và liên quan trực tiếp đến người bạn vừa mô tả.

Question 1: Do you still keep in touch with this person?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I do. I follow his social media pages and sometimes watch his videos online. I hope to meet him again someday.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely. I make it a point to attend his public talks whenever possible, and we occasionally correspond via email about conservation projects. In fact, I’m hoping to collaborate with his team on a research project next year, which would be an incredible opportunity.

---

Question 2: Would you like to be like this person in the future?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I would. I want to help people and make a difference like he does. I think his work is very meaningful and important.

Band 8-9 Answer:
In many ways, yes. While I may not follow the exact same career trajectory, I definitely aspire to emulate his commitment to making tangible, positive impacts and his ability to inspire others to take action. His model of marrying passion with purpose is something I’d very much like to incorporate into my own professional life.

Trong bối cảnh thảo luận về người truyền cảm hứng, bạn cũng có thể tham khảo cách kể về describe a family celebration you enjoyed recently vì những người trong gia đình thường là nguồn cảm hứng lớn, và cách bạn mô tả họ trong các sự kiện gia đình cũng thể hiện được personal values và emotional connections.

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần thảo luận sâu và trừu tượng nhất của IELTS Speaking, kéo dài 4-5 phút. Đây là lúc examiner muốn kiểm tra khả năng phân tích, đánh giá, và thảo luận về các vấn đề xã hội rộng hơn liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2 bạn vừa nói.

Yêu cầu của Part 3 khác biệt hoàn toàn so với Part 1 và 2. Bạn cần phải think critically, present arguments có lý lẽ rõ ràng, xem xét nhiều perspectives của vấn đề, và sử dụng ngôn ngữ trừu tượng. Câu trả lời nên dài hơn Part 1 (khoảng 3-5 câu) và demonstrate ability to discuss ideas in depth.

Chiến lược hiệu quả cho Part 3 bao gồm việc mở rộng câu trả lời theo structure: Direct answer → Explanation/Reason 1 + example → Reason 2 + example → Conclusion/Nuance. Sử dụng discourse markers để organize ideas (Well, Actually, On the one hand, However, I think). Đừng ngại acknowledge complexity của issues bằng tentative language (It seems to me, To some extent, I would say).

Lỗi phổ biến của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 3 là trả lời quá ngắn như Part 1, không phân tích sâu vấn đề, thiếu examples từ xã hội (chỉ nói về personal experience), sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản cho abstract topics, và không thể express nuanced opinions. Nhiều bạn cũng có xu hướng give one-sided views thay vì balanced arguments.

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Role Models and Society

Question 1: What qualities do people generally look for in role models nowadays?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion/Description – yêu cầu generalization về social trends
• Key words: qualities, role models, nowadays (so sánh với past có thể tốt)
• Cách tiếp cận: Nêu 2-3 qualities chính → giải thích why they matter → examples từ society → có thể add nuance về changes over time

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think people nowadays look for role models who are successful and famous. For example, many young people admire celebrities like singers or actors because they are rich and popular. People also like role models who help others, like charity workers. Another quality is being honest and real, not fake. This is important because people want to trust their role models.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có attempt to give multiple qualities nhưng organization còn loose
• Vocabulary: Basic (successful, famous, rich, popular, honest, real, fake, trust)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Answers the question adequately nhưng lacks depth trong explanation. Examples quá general (singers or actors) thay vì specific. Thiếu sophisticated language và critical analysis về why these qualities matter in modern context.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, I’d say there’s been quite a shift in what people value in role models in recent years. Increasingly, people seem drawn to figures who demonstrate authenticity rather than just polished perfection. This is particularly evident among younger generations who are quite savvy about manufactured images on social media – they’re looking for people who are transparent about their struggles and failures, not just their successes.

Beyond authenticity, I think people nowadays prioritize role models who use their platform for social good. It’s no longer sufficient to simply be talented or successful; there’s an expectation that influential figures will leverage their visibility to champion important causes – whether that’s environmental sustainability, mental health awareness, or social justice. We’ve seen this with celebrities like Emma Watson or Leonardo DiCaprio, whose advocacy work has become integral to their public persona.

However, I’d also argue that the definition of a role model has become more democratized. Thanks to social media, people don’t only look up to high-profile figures – they’re equally likely to be inspired by everyday individuals who demonstrate resilience, whether that’s a teacher who goes above and beyond, or someone who’s overcome adversity in their local community. This grassroots admiration, I think, reflects a growing recognition that inspiration can come from anywhere, not just from people in the spotlight.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Extremely well-organized: Opening statement → Quality 1 (authenticity) + explanation + example → Quality 2 (social responsibility) + explanation + examples → Contrasting point about democratization + conclusion. Shows sophisticated discourse management.
• Vocabulary: Precise và sophisticated (shift in what people value, demonstrate authenticity, polished perfection, savvy about manufactured images, transparent about struggles, prioritize, leverage their visibility, champion important causes, integral to public persona, democratized, high-profile figures, grassroots admiration, reflects a growing recognition)
• Grammar: Complex structures naturally used (This is particularly evident among younger generations who…, It’s no longer sufficient to simply be…, there’s an expectation that…, I’d also argue that…, Thanks to social media…)
• Critical Thinking: Shows ability to analyze trends, compare past and present, acknowledge complexity (democratization of role models), và provide specific examples to support points

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, Increasingly, Beyond, However, I’d also argue
• Tentative language: I’d say, I think, seems, I’d argue – shows sophisticated English bằng cách avoid absolute statements
• Abstract nouns: authenticity, perfection, sustainability, awareness, justice, advocacy, resilience, adversity, admiration, recognition

---

Question 2: Do you think celebrities have a responsibility to be good role models?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion với ethical dimension – cần present balanced view
• Key words: celebrities, responsibility, good role models
• Cách tiếp cận: State your position → Arguments supporting → Counter-argument → Conclusion with nuance

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think celebrities should be good role models because many people, especially young people, follow them. If celebrities do bad things, their fans might copy them. For example, if a famous singer uses drugs, young fans might think it’s okay to do the same. However, celebrities are also normal people and they can make mistakes. So I think they should try to be good examples, but we shouldn’t expect them to be perfect.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Has position → reason → example → counter-point → conclusion, nhưng development còn superficial
• Vocabulary: Simple (bad things, copy them, normal people, make mistakes, good examples)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear opinion và basic argumentation, nhưng lacks sophistication. Example about drugs quá predictable. Không explore complexity of the issue deeply.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9:

This is quite a contentious issue, and I think it really depends on how we define “responsibility”. On one hand, I believe that when someone chooses to step into the public eye and actively cultivates a following – particularly among impressionable young people – they do assume a certain moral obligation to be mindful of their influence. The reality is that celebrities wield tremendous power in shaping attitudes and behaviors, whether they acknowledge it or not. Research has shown that parasocial relationships – where fans develop one-sided emotional connections with celebrities – can significantly influence everything from purchasing decisions to lifestyle choices. Given this power, I’d argue there’s definitely an ethical dimension to their public behavior.

That said, I think we need to be careful about placing unrealistic expectations on celebrities. After all, they’re human beings who are entitled to make mistakes and have private lives. The problem arises when we conflate fame with moral authority – just because someone is talented at acting or sports doesn’t necessarily mean they’re equipped to serve as a moral compass. What I find problematic is when celebrities actively market themselves as role models – perhaps by targeting children in their advertising or deliberately cultivating a wholesome image – but then behave hypocritically in ways that contradict that image.

Perhaps more importantly, I think the real responsibility lies with parents, educators, and society at large to help young people develop critical thinking skills so they don’t blindly idolize celebrities. We should teach children to distinguish between entertainment value and life guidance, and to seek inspiration from people in their actual lives rather than projecting idealized virtues onto distant famous figures. Celebrity culture will always exist, but if we foster more discernment among young people, the question of whether celebrities need to be perfect role models becomes less critical.

So in summary, while I believe celebrities should be conscious of their influence, ultimate responsibility for navigating celebrity culture rests with individuals, families, and broader social institutions.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated multi-layered argument: Acknowledges complexity of issue → Argument for responsibility + evidence → Counter-argument about unrealistic expectations → Additional perspective about where true responsibility lies → Summary/conclusion. Shows high-level critical thinking.
• Vocabulary: Exemplary range (contentious issue, step into the public eye, cultivates, assume a moral obligation, wield tremendous power, parasocial relationships, purchasing decisions, placing unrealistic expectations, conflate, equipped to serve, problematic, targeting children, hypocritically, blindly idolize, distinguish between, projecting idealized virtues, foster discernment, conscious of, ultimate responsibility, broader social institutions)
• Grammar: Full range used naturally (conditional structures, relative clauses, participle clauses, passive voice, inversion). Complex ideas expressed clearly: “Given this power, I’d argue there’s definitely…”, “The problem arises when we conflate…”, “What I find problematic is when…”
• Critical Thinking: Exceptional. Shows ability to see multiple perspectives, question assumptions (just because someone is talented doesn’t mean they’re equipped to serve as moral compass), bring in research (parasocial relationships), và propose solutions (critical thinking skills)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Acknowledging complexity: “This is quite a contentious issue”, “it really depends on”, “That said”, “Perhaps more importantly”
• Hedging và tentative language: “I think”, “I believe”, “I’d argue”, “doesn’t necessarily mean”
• Academic style: “Research has shown that”, “Given this power”, “the reality is that”
• Contrasting: “On one hand”, “That said”, “while”

---

Theme 2: Inspiration and Achievement

Question 3: Why do you think some people are more successful in inspiring others than others?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause-Effect/Analysis – cần explain reasons và factors
• Key words: some people, more successful, inspiring others
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple factors → explain each → examples → có thể add về how these factors interact

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think some people inspire others more because they have good communication skills. If someone can speak well and explain their ideas clearly, people will listen to them. Also, people who have achieved success in their life can inspire others because they show what is possible. Another reason is that some people have strong personalities that attract others. For example, a confident person who is also kind will inspire more people than someone who is shy.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists multiple factors (communication, achievement, personality) nhưng không deeply explore
• Vocabulary: Basic (good communication skills, speak well, achieved success, strong personalities, attract others, confident, kind, shy)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Identifies relevant factors nhưng explanation superficial. Personality description too simplistic. Example about confidence vs shyness quite black-and-white.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9:

I think the ability to inspire others hinges on several interconnected factors, and it’s rarely just one quality that makes the difference.

First and foremost, I’d say authenticity plays a crucial role. People who inspire others most effectively tend to be those who practice what they preach – there’s congruence between their words and actions. When someone talks about perseverance while simultaneously demonstrating it in their own life, their message carries weight in a way that mere rhetoric never could. We see this with figures like Malala Yousafzai, whose unwavering commitment to education despite facing life-threatening opposition lends credibility to her advocacy.

Beyond authenticity, I think relatability is surprisingly important. People who inspire us most strike a balance between being aspirational and accessible. If someone seems too perfect or their achievements feel completely out of reach, they may command respect but not necessarily inspire us to action. The most effective inspirational figures are those who are transparent about their struggles and failures, making their journey feel attainable. This is why we often see people more moved by stories of individuals who’ve overcome adversity rather than those who’ve had a relatively smooth path to success.

I’d also highlight emotional intelligence as a critical factor. People who truly inspire others possess an ability to tap into universal human emotions and experiences. They understand what resonates with people at a visceral level – whether that’s hope, justice, belonging, or purpose. Master inspirers, if you will, frame their message in ways that help others see themselves as part of something larger and more meaningful.

Finally, I think timing and context matter more than we often acknowledge. Sometimes individuals become inspirational not solely because of their inherent qualities, but because they emerge at a moment when society desperately needs the particular message or example they provide. Think about how environmental activists have become increasingly inspirational as climate anxiety has intensified – their message hasn’t necessarily changed, but the receptiveness of the audience has.

So in essence, successful inspiration is a convergence of personal authenticity, relatable human qualities, emotional intelligence, and often, being the right person at the right time with the right message.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptional organization: Introduces multi-factor approach → Factor 1 (authenticity) + explanation + specific example → Factor 2 (relatability) + nuanced explanation → Factor 3 (emotional intelligence) → Factor 4 (context/timing) + example → Synthesis conclusion
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (hinges on, interconnected factors, practice what they preach, congruence, carries weight, mere rhetoric, unwavering commitment, lends credibility, strike a balance, aspirational and accessible, out of reach, command respect, transparent about, attainable, overcome adversity, emotional intelligence, tap into, resonates, master inspirers, frame their message, emerge at, desperately needs, climate anxiety has intensified, receptiveness, convergence of)
• Grammar: Full range demonstrated: complex conditionals (If someone seems too perfect… they may command respect but not necessarily inspire), relative clauses, participle clauses, passive constructions (are more moved by), cleft sentences (This is why we often see…), cohesive devices used expertly
• Critical Thinking: Outstanding. Goes beyond obvious answers to explore nuanced factors. Shows ability to synthesize multiple elements. Acknowledges external factors (timing, context) not just individual qualities. Uses specific, thoughtful examples (Malala, environmental activists).

💡 Key Language Features:

• Academic discourse markers: First and foremost, Beyond, I’d also highlight, Finally, So in essence
• Qualifying language: I think, I’d say, tend to be, surprisingly, often, more than we often acknowledge
• Abstract conceptualization: congruence, rhetoric, credibility, relatability, aspirational, emotional intelligence, receptiveness, convergence
• Sophisticated comparisons: between…and, rather than, not solely…but, not necessarily

Giám khảo và thí sinh đang thảo luận sâu trong Part 3 về vai trò của người truyền cảm hứng trong xã hội

Theme 3: Media and Inspiration

Question 4: How has social media changed the way people find inspiration?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare/Contrast (past vs present), Cause-Effect
• Key words: social media, changed, find inspiration
• Cách tiếp cận: Describe how it was before → How it is now (changes) → Effects/implications → Balanced view (positive and negative)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7-8:

Social media has definitely changed how people find inspiration in significant ways. In the past, people mostly found inspiration from people they knew personally, like family members or teachers, or from famous people they saw on TV or in newspapers. Now, with social media, people can discover inspiring figures from all over the world instantly.

I think one major change is accessibility. Anyone with a smartphone can now follow inspirational people on Instagram, YouTube, or TikTok. You don’t need to wait for TV programs or buy magazines – inspiration is available 24/7. For example, young people today can watch motivational videos from entrepreneurs, athletes, or activists whenever they want, which makes seeking inspiration more convenient than ever before.

Another change is that social media has democratized who can be inspiring. In the past, you usually needed to be already famous or have achieved something major to inspire others on a large scale. Now, ordinary people who share their personal journeys – whether that’s overcoming illness, learning new skills, or pursuing unusual careers – can build followings and inspire thousands or even millions. This has made inspiration more diverse and relatable.

However, there’s also a downside. Social media can create unrealistic expectations because people often only share their highlight reels – their successes and happy moments – not their struggles. This curated content can sometimes make others feel inadequate rather than inspired. Additionally, the sheer volume of content can be overwhelming, making it hard to distinguish genuine inspiration from people just trying to build their personal brand.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear comparison past/present, multiple changes identified, balanced view with negative aspects
• Vocabulary: Good range (significant ways, inspiring figures, accessibility, motivational videos, democratized, personal journeys, overcoming illness, diverse, relatable, unrealistic expectations, highlight reels, curated content, sheer volume, overwhelming, genuine inspiration, personal brand)
• Tại sao Band 7-8: Well-organized với clear development of ideas. Vocabulary good và appropriate. Grammar mostly accurate với variety. Shows critical thinking bằng acknowledging both positive và negative effects. Could reach 8+ với more sophisticated expressions và deeper analysis.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9:

Social media has absolutely revolutionized the landscape of inspiration in ways that are both profound and, I’d argue, somewhat paradoxical.

Perhaps the most fundamental shift has been the democratization of influence. Pre-internet, the ability to inspire large numbers of people was largely concentrated in traditional gatekeepers – publishers, broadcasters, institutions. If you weren’t endorsed by these entities, your reach was inevitably limited. Social media has dismantled these barriers, enabling virtually anyone with an internet connection to share their story and potentially resonate with a global audience. We’ve seen people from marginalized communities whose stories would never have made it through traditional media filters now amassing substantial followings and challenging mainstream narratives about success and achievement.

This has led to what I’d call an unprecedented diversification of inspirational content. Rather than a relatively homogeneous set of role models dictated by mass media, people can now curate their inspiration to align with their specific interests, values, and identities. Someone interested in sustainable living can follow dozens of zero-waste advocates, while someone navigating a particular health challenge can connect with communities of people facing similar struggles. This granularity and specificity simply wasn’t possible before.

However – and this is where the paradox comes in – I think this abundance has actually made authentic inspiration harder to find in some ways. Social media platforms are algorithmically designed to maximize engagement, which often means promoting content that’s visually striking or emotionally provocative rather than genuinely meaningful. There’s also the phenomenon of performative inspiration – people crafting carefully curated personas that present an illusion of an inspiring life while potentially concealing a very different reality. The aspirational lifestyle content we see constantly can create what psychologists call comparative despair – people feel worse about their lives the more they consume this content, which is the antithesis of true inspiration.

Additionally, I think the instantaneous nature of social media has somewhat cheapened the concept of inspiration. When we’re bombarded with supposedly inspirational content constantly – every quote, every success story, every transformation photo – there’s a risk of desensitization. Inspiration becomes just another form of consumable content rather than something that sparks genuine internal transformation.

So while social media has undeniably expanded access to diverse sources of inspiration, I think we’re still grappling with how to navigate this new landscape in ways that foster authentic motivation rather than just superficial engagement or, worse, disillusionment. The technology has changed; whether we’ve adapted our consumption habits in healthy ways remains an open question.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptional – sophisticated thesis with paradox introduced → Major change 1 (democratization) deeply explored → Major change 2 (diversification) with specific examples → Counterpoint about negative effects extensively developed → Synthesis về ongoing challenges. Shows ability to develop complex argument comprehensively.
• Vocabulary: Outstanding range và precision (revolutionized, profound, paradoxical, fundamental shift, democratization of influence, concentrated in gatekeepers, endorsed by, dismantled these barriers, resonate with, marginalized communities, amassing, challenging mainstream narratives, unprecedented diversification, homogeneous, dictated by, curate, granularity, algorithmically designed, maximize engagement, visually striking, emotionally provocative, performative inspiration, curated personas, illusion, comparative despair, antithesis, instantaneous, cheapened, bombarded, desensitization, consumable content, sparks genuine internal transformation, undeniably expanded access, grappling with, foster authentic motivation, disillusionment)
• Grammar: Full mastery: complex conditionals, passive structures, relative clauses, participle constructions, noun phrases, gerunds as subjects. Seamless handling of complex ideas through sophisticated syntax.
• Critical Thinking: Exceptional analytical depth. Introduces paradox và explores it thoroughly. References psychology (comparative despair, desensitization). Considers múltiple dimensions (access, content, psychology, platforms’ role). Shows ability to synthesize complex issues và present nuanced conclusion.

💡 Key Language Features:

• Academic register: “I’d argue”, “Perhaps the most fundamental shift”, “This has led to”, “This is where the paradox comes in”, “psychologists call”, “remains an open question”
• Sophisticated transitions: “However – and this is where the paradox comes in”, “Additionally”, “So while…I think”
• Qualifying language: “somewhat”, “in some ways”, “often means”, “potentially”, “supposedly”
• Abstract conceptualization: democratization, gatekeepers, homogeneous content, granularity, algorithmic design, performative behavior, comparative despair, desensitization, internal transformation

Khi thảo luận về tác động của những người truyền cảm hứng, điều này cũng liên quan đến các sự kiện gia đình đặc biệt như describe a special family event, nơi chúng ta thường thấy và học hỏi từ các thành viên gia đình về giá trị sống và sự kiên cường.

---

Question 5: Do you think young people today have better role models than previous generations?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare/Evaluate across generations – cần balanced argument
• Key words: young people today, better role models, previous generations
• Cách tiếp cận: Define what “better” means → Arguments for yes → Arguments for no → Nuanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7-8:

That’s an interesting question, and I think the answer isn’t straightforward. In some ways, yes, but in other ways, perhaps not.

On the positive side, I’d say young people today have access to a much more diverse range of role models than previous generations. Thanks to the internet and social media, they can find people who represent different backgrounds, careers, lifestyles, and values. For instance, a young person interested in technology can follow numerous successful entrepreneurs, not just the few that might appear in traditional media. This variety means young people are more likely to find someone they can relate to and aspire to become.

Moreover, many modern role models are more open and authentic about their challenges and mental health struggles, which makes them more humanized and relatable. Previous generations’ role models were often presented as flawless or untouchable, which could be discouraging rather than inspiring.

However, there are also arguments for the opposite view. The saturation of information today means that young people are also exposed to many negative influences and people who achieve fame without necessarily having admirable qualities. Reality TV stars or social media influencers who become famous for superficial reasons might not provide the same depth of inspiration as historical figures who made significant contributions to society.

Additionally, the emphasis on material success, appearance, and instant fame in today’s culture might mean that the criteria for what makes a good role model have shifted in ways that aren’t necessarily positive. Previous generations might have looked up to scientists, civil rights leaders, or people who dedicated their lives to service – role models based on substance rather than surface-level appeal.

So overall, I’d say it’s a mixed picture – young people have more options and accessibility, but whether those options are “better” depends on how we define role models and what values we prioritize.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Balanced two-sided argument well-organized: Introduction acknowledging complexity → Positive aspects (diversity, authenticity) → Negative aspects (saturation, superficiality) → Conclusion recognizing it depends on definition
• Vocabulary: Strong range (access to, diverse range, represent, relate to, aspire to, open and authentic, humanized, flawless, untouchable, discouraging, saturation, exposed to, made significant contributions, emphasis on, instant fame, criteria, shifted, substance, surface-level, mixed picture)
• Grammar: Good variety với complex sentences, conditional meanings, comparatives
• Critical Thinking: Shows ability to see both sides, consider what “better” means, acknowledge that answer depends on values
• Tại sao Band 7-8: Thorough, balanced analysis với good vocabulary và clear organization. To reach 8.5-9 cần more sophisticated expressions, deeper analysis of underlying societal changes, và possibly more specific examples.

---

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
inspiring	adj	/ɪnˈspaɪərɪŋ/	truyền cảm hứng	She is an inspiring teacher who motivates all her students.	inspiring figure, inspiring story, truly inspiring, incredibly inspiring
admirable	adj	/ˈædmərəbl/	đáng ngưỡng mộ	His dedication to helping others is truly admirable.	admirable qualities, admirable achievement, highly admirable, particularly admirable
dedication	n	/ˌdedɪˈkeɪʃn/	sự cống hiến, tận tụy	Her dedication to her work is remarkable.	unwavering dedication, complete dedication, dedication to (something), demonstrate dedication
resilience	n	/rɪˈzɪliəns/	sự kiên cường, bền bỉ	His resilience in the face of adversity inspired many people.	demonstrate resilience, remarkable resilience, build resilience, emotional resilience
perseverance	n	/ˌpɜːsəˈvɪərəns/	sự kiên trì	Success requires perseverance and hard work.	show perseverance, require perseverance, through perseverance, unwavering perseverance
overcome adversity	phrase	/ˌəʊvəˈkʌm ədˈvɜːsəti/	vượt qua nghịch cảnh	She managed to overcome adversity and achieve her dreams.	successfully overcome adversity, help others overcome adversity, story of overcoming adversity
make a difference	phrase	/meɪk ə ˈdɪfrəns/	tạo ra sự khác biệt	He wants to make a difference in people’s lives.	make a real difference, make a positive difference, make a significant difference, try to make a difference
role model	n	/rəʊl ˈmɒdl/	hình mẫu, tấm gương	My teacher is a great role model for young people.	positive role model, serve as a role model, become a role model, strong role model
selfless	adj	/ˈselfləs/	vô tư, không ích kỷ	Her selfless dedication to charity work is inspiring.	selfless act, selfless devotion, selfless service, truly selfless
compassion	n	/kəmˈpæʃn/	lòng trắc ẩn, thương cảm	She treats all patients with great compassion.	show compassion, deep compassion, act of compassion, compassion for others
empathy	n	/ˈempəθi/	sự đồng cảm	Good leaders need to have empathy for their team members.	show empathy, lack of empathy, develop empathy, genuine empathy
integrity	n	/ɪnˈteɡrəti/	tính chính trực, liêm chính	He is known for his honesty and integrity.	moral integrity, personal integrity, maintain integrity, person of integrity
unwavering	adj	/ʌnˈweɪvərɪŋ/	không lay chuyển, kiên định	Her unwavering belief in her students helped them succeed.	unwavering commitment, unwavering support, unwavering determination, unwavering faith
pioneering	adj	/ˌpaɪəˈnɪərɪŋ/	tiên phong, đi đầu	His pioneering work in medical research saved many lives.	pioneering spirit, pioneering research, pioneering work, pioneering efforts
transformative	adj	/trænsˈfɔːmətɪv/	có tính chuyển đổi, thay đổi sâu sắc	Her teaching had a transformative impact on my life.	transformative experience, transformative impact, transformative power, truly transformative
exemplify	v	/ɪɡˈzemplɪfaɪ/	minh họa, là tấm gương	She exemplifies the qualities of a great leader.	exemplify values, exemplify qualities, exemplify dedication, clearly exemplify
embody	v	/ɪmˈbɒdi/	thể hiện, hiện thân	He embodies the spirit of generosity and kindness.	embody values, embody principles, embody spirit, truly embody
contribution	n	/ˌkɒntrɪˈbjuːʃn/	đóng góp	His contributions to society are significant.	make a contribution, valuable contribution, significant contribution, lasting contribution
humanitarian	adj	/hjuːˌmænɪˈteəriən/	nhân đạo	She has devoted her life to humanitarian work.	humanitarian work, humanitarian efforts, humanitarian causes, humanitarian organization
advocate	n/v	/ˈædvəkət/ (n), /ˈædvəkeɪt/ (v)	người ủng hộ / ủng hộ mạnh mẽ	She is a strong advocate for children’s rights.	advocate for (cause), strong advocate, passionate advocate, advocate change

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
go the extra mile	nỗ lực hơn mức mong đợi	She always goes the extra mile to help her students understand difficult concepts.	7.5-8
bring out the best in people	làm nổi bật phẩm chất tốt nhất của ai đó	Great leaders have the ability to bring out the best in people.	7.5-8
against all odds	bất chấp mọi khó khăn	He succeeded against all odds and became a successful entrepreneur.	7.5-8
break new ground	tiên phong, phá vỡ ranh giới	Her research broke new ground in cancer treatment.	8-8.5
epitomize	là hình mẫu điển hình của	She epitomizes grace under pressure.	8-8.5
walk the talk	làm đúng những gì nói	What I respect about him is that he doesn’t just talk about values – he walks the talk.	7.5-8
leave a lasting legacy	để lại di sản lâu dài	His work in education has left a lasting legacy in the community.	8-8.5
beacon of hope	ngọn hải đăng hy vọng	She became a beacon of hope for disadvantaged children.	8-8.5
rise above	vượt qua, không bị ảnh hưởng bởi	Despite facing discrimination, she rose above it and achieved great success.	7.5-8
make waves	tạo ra tác động lớn	His innovative approach to teaching is making waves in the education sector.	7.5-8
trailblazer	người tiên phong, mở đường	She’s a trailblazer for women in technology.	8-8.5
weather the storm	vượt qua giai đoạn khó khăn	The company weathered the storm during the economic crisis thanks to her leadership.	7.5-8

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Sử dụng khi cần một chút thời gian suy nghĩ hoặc để làm mềm câu trả lời
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi muốn đưa ra thông tin thật sự hoặc góc nhìn khác với mong đợi
• 📝 To be honest,… / Honestly,… – Khi nói thẳng thắn về quan điểm cá nhân
• 📝 I’d say that… – Cách lịch sự để đưa ra opinion
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Thể hiện đây là quan điểm cá nhân

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… / What’s more,… – Thêm vào đó, hơn nữa
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
• 📝 Additionally,… / Moreover,… – Ngoài ra
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài điều đó ra
• 📝 Another thing is… – Một điều khác là

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét
• 📝 That said,… / Having said that,… – Dù vậy thì
• 📝 However,… / Nevertheless,… – Tuy nhiên

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… / Overall,… – Nhìn chung, tóm lại
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì
• 📝 In essence,… – Về bản chất
• 📝 So in summary,… – Tóm lại thì

Để làm rõ hoặc paraphrase:

• 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác
• 📝 To put it another way,… – Diễn đạt theo cách khác

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional:

• Formula: If + past perfect, would/could + infinitive
• Ví dụ: “If she hadn’t overcome so many obstacles in her early life, she wouldn’t be the inspiring leader she is today.”

Inversion (Đảo ngữ):

• Formula: Had + S + past participle, S + would have…
• Ví dụ: “Had he not shown such unwavering dedication, many people would never have been inspired to pursue their dreams.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

• Formula: N, who/which + V, V
• Ví dụ: “My mentor, who has dedicated her life to education, continues to inspire thousands of students every year.”

Reduced relative clauses:

• Formula: N + V-ing/V-ed
• Ví dụ: “People working in healthcare often demonstrate the kind of selfless dedication that truly inspires others.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive structures:

• It is thought/believed/said that…
• Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that authentic role models who share their struggles are more inspiring than those who only showcase their successes.”

Get passive (informal):

• Ví dụ: “She got recognized for her humanitarian work and became a role model for young people.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What-cleft:

• What I find most… is…
• Ví dụ: “What I find most inspiring about him is not his achievements, but his humility and willingness to help others.”

It-cleft:

• The thing that… is…
• Ví dụ: “The thing that makes her truly inspiring is her ability to remain compassionate even in the face of adversity.”

5. Participle Clauses:

• Ví dụ: “Having overcome numerous challenges herself, she understands the struggles that young people face.”
• Ví dụ: “Inspired by her mentor’s example, she decided to dedicate her life to helping others.”

6. Subjunctive Mood:

• Ví dụ: “It’s essential that inspiring figures be authentic rather than creating a false persona.”
• Ví dụ: “I would suggest that society encourage young people to seek inspiration from diverse sources.”

Đối với những ai quan tâm đến việc kể về những bữa ăn đặc biệt cùng người truyền cảm hứng, bạn có thể tham khảo describe a recent meal that you enjoyed để học cách mô tả chi tiết những khoảnh khắc và trải nghiệm đáng nhớ.

Infographic từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng cho chủ đề người truyền cảm hứng trong IELTS Speaking

Chiến Lược và Lời Khuyên Từ Examiner

Những Điều Examiner Chú Ý Khi Chấm Điểm

Với hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm chấm thi, tôi muốn chia sẻ những điều mà examiners thực sự đánh giá cao và những lỗi thường làm giảm band điểm của thí sinh:

Fluency & Coherence – Điều gì tạo nên sự khác biệt:

Band 6-7: Nói tương đối trôi chảy nhưng có noticeable hesitations, self-corrections. Sử dụng basic linking words (and, but, because, so). Có thể lặp lại ý hoặc từ ngữ.

Band 8-9: Nói tự nhiên với minimal hesitation. Discourse markers được sử dụng sophisticatedly (Well, Actually, Having said that, What strikes me most). Ideas develop logically và smoothly. Không lặp lại không cần thiết.

Lời khuyên: Thay vì chỉ học từ vựng khó, hãy tập nói về các chủ đề khác nhau để develop natural rhythm. Record yourself và nghe lại để identify hesitations. Practice paraphrasing – một skill quan trọng để avoid repetition.

Lexical Resource – Không chỉ là từ vựng khó:

Nhiều học viên nghĩ rằng sử dụng từ vựng academic hoặc uncommon sẽ được điểm cao. Điều này không đúng. Examiner đánh giá:

• Precision: Từ bạn dùng có chính xác với context không?
• Range: Bạn có variety trong vocabulary không, hay chỉ lặp lại những từ giống nhau?
• Collocations: Bạn có combine words naturally như native speakers không?
• Appropriateness: Vocabulary có phù hợp với spoken English không? (Tránh quá formal như academic writing)

Ví dụ sai lầm phổ biến:

• ❌ “He is very perspicacious” (quá formal, không natural trong speaking)
• ✅ “He has remarkable insight into people’s motivations” (natural và sophisticated)

Ví dụ về good collocations:

• ✅ “unwavering commitment” (not “unchanging commitment”)
• ✅ “overcome adversity” (not “defeat difficulty”)
• ✅ “make a tangible difference” (not “make a touchable difference”)

Grammar – Accuracy vs Complexity:

Band 6-7: Chủ yếu simple và compound sentences. Complex structures có nhưng often with errors. Tenses cơ bản đúng.

Band 8-9: Wide range của structures used naturally: conditionals, relative clauses, participles, passive, inversions. Errors rare và không affect communication.

Quan trọng: Đừng force sử dụng cấu trúc phức tạp nếu bạn không confident. Better một câu simple accurate hơn một câu complex sai nhiều lỗi. Nhưng để đạt 7+, bạn cần demonstrate variety.

Pronunciation – Không chỉ là accent:

Examiners không expect British hoặc American accent. Pronunciation assessment focuses on:

• Intelligibility: Người nghe có hiểu bạn dễ dàng không?
• Word stress: “PHOtograph” vs “phoTOgraphy” vs “photoGRAPHic”
• Sentence stress: Nhấn mạnh information words, không stress function words
• Intonation: Rising cho questions, falling cho statements

Lỗi pronunciation của học viên Việt:

• Không phân biệt /s/ và /ʃ/ (see vs she)
• Thêm âm /s/ vào cuối từ số nhiều không đúng
• Nói monotone, không có intonation patterns
• Word stress sai (ví dụ: “DEvelop” thay vì “deVElop”)

Những Lỗi Phổ Biến Cần Tránh

1. Học thuộc template và áp dụng cứng nhắc:

Examiners rất dễ nhận ra khi thí sinh học thuộc. Red flags bao gồm:

• Sử dụng những cụm từ quá “polished” không match với ability thực
• Pause không natural (vì đang nhớ template)
• Template không fit với câu hỏi cụ thể

Thay vào đó: Học vocabulary và structures, nhưng practice applying them naturally to different questions. Create your own phrases dựa trên personality và experiences của bạn.

2. Trả lời quá ngắn hoặc quá dài không đúng chỗ:

Part 1: 2-3 câu là ideal. Quá ngắn (just Yes/No) hoặc quá dài (5-6 câu) đều không phù hợp.

Part 2: Must nói 2-3 phút đầy đủ. Nhiều học viên nói chưa đủ 1.5 phút vì không biết expand ideas.

Part 3: 3-5 câu, develop ideas fully nhưng don’t ramble.

3. Không trả lời đúng câu hỏi:

Đây là lỗi serious. Ví dụ:

• Câu hỏi: “Why do you think…?” → Cần explain reasons
• Học viên trả lời: Kể story hoặc describe situation → Sai focus

Solution: Listen carefully, identify question type (Why/How/What/Compare/Opinion), và structure answer phù hợp.

4. Sử dụng từ vựng sai context:

Ví dụ phổ biến:

• ❌ “He is very appreciate” (Sai: appreciate là verb)

• ✅ “He is very appreciative” hoặc “I really appreciate him”

• ❌ “Make an influence on”

• ✅ “Have an influence on” hoặc “Influence someone”

5. Quá focus vào grammar mà mất đi fluency:

Một số học viên pause quá lâu giữa sentences để construct perfect grammar. Điều này làm giảm Fluency score nghiêm trọng hơn là một vài grammar errors nhỏ.

Balance: Aim for accuracy nhưng maintain flow. It’s okay to make minor grammar mistakes nếu bạn self-correct naturally và không affect meaning.

Khi nói về người truyền cảm hứng, đôi khi đó cũng là những người đã cùng bạn trải qua describe a time when you attended a performance, nơi bạn có thể được chiêm ngưỡng tài năng và sự tận tâm của họ trong lĩnh vực nghệ thuật.

Tips Chuẩn Bị Hiệu Quả

1. Record và tự đánh giá:

Record yourself trả lời IELTS questions và listen back:

• Identify hesitations và fillers (um, uh, like) quá nhiều
• Check pronunciation và intonation
• Assess fluency và coherence
• Note down vocabulary mistakes

2. Practice with variety:

Đừng chỉ practice một đề. Với chủ đề “inspiring person”, practice nhiều variations:

• Inspiring teacher vs inspiring family member vs inspiring public figure
• Different reasons why they inspire you
• Different qualities và achievements

3. Build personal story bank:

Prepare 5-7 personal stories/examples có thể adapt cho different topics:

• A challenge you overcame
• A person who helped you
• An achievement you’re proud of
• A time you helped someone
• A lesson you learned

4. Extend với structure formula:

Part 1 formula: Direct answer + Reason/Explanation + Example/Detail

Part 2 formula:

• Introduction (who/what)
• Background (how you know/context)
• Main content (what they do/what happened) – longest part
• Explanation (why inspiring/what you learned) – critical part
• Brief conclusion if time allows

Part 3 formula:

• Direct response to question
• Point 1 + explanation + example
• Point 2 + explanation + example
• Counter-point or nuance (for balanced view)
• Brief conclusion

5. Vocabulary notebook organization:

Organize vocabulary by:

• Topic: Inspiring people, challenges, achievements, qualities
• Function: Describing people, expressing opinions, giving reasons, comparing
• Collocations: Write down complete phrases, not just single words

6. Simulate exam conditions:

Practice với timing:

• Part 1: 4-5 phút tổng, mỗi question 20-30 giây
• Part 2: 1 phút chuẩn bị + 2-3 phút nói
• Part 3: 4-5 phút tổng, mỗi question 40-60 giây

Practice with speaking partner hoặc record và review.

7. Develop critical thinking:

Cho Part 3, practice analyzing issues từ multiple angles:

• Advantages và disadvantages
• Past vs present vs future
• Individual vs society perspective
• Ideal vs reality

8. Xem authentic materials:

Watch interviews, TED talks, podcasts về inspiring people:

• Note down vocabulary và expressions
• Observe how speakers structure their ideas
• Pay attention to pronunciation và intonation patterns

Ngày Thi – Những Điều Cần Nhớ

Trước khi vào phòng thi:

✅ Arrive 15-20 phút sớm để calm down

✅ Don’t cram vocabulary phút cuối – điều này sẽ make you more anxious

✅ Warm up voice: nói tiếng Anh với bản thân về bất kỳ topic nào

✅ Take deep breaths để relax

Trong phòng thi:

✅ Build rapport với examiner: Smile, make eye contact, be friendly. Examiner là người bình thường, không phải enemy.

✅ Listen carefully: Nếu không nghe rõ question, politely ask: “I’m sorry, could you repeat that?” hoặc “Could you rephrase the question, please?”

✅ Think before speaking (but not too long): 2-3 giây pause để organize thoughts là okay. Use discourse markers để buy time: “Well, that’s an interesting question…” “Let me think about that…”

✅ Don’t panic về mistakes: Nếu realize một grammar mistake, briefly self-correct và move on. Don’t dwell on it.

✅ Stay on topic: Nếu realize đang đi off-topic, politely redirect: “Sorry, coming back to your question…”

✅ Use body language: Hand gestures (not excessive), nodding, facial expressions – tất cả contribute to communication.

✅ Part 2 preparation time:

• Write keywords only, không write sentences
• Organize theo bullet points trong đề
• Leave space cho transition words
• Write pronunciation của từ khó nếu cần

✅ Maintain energy: Especially trong Part 2, keep enthusiasm trong voice. Monotone delivery sẽ lower Pronunciation score.

Sau mỗi part:

❌ Don’t dwell on mistakes. Part đã qua rồi, focus on part tiếp theo.

❌ Don’t judge performance based on examiner’s facial expressions. Examiners trained để maintain neutral face.

Khi kết thúc:

✅ Thank the examiner politely

✅ Don’t ask about your score – examiners cannot tell you

✅ Move on and focus on other parts of the test hoặc celebrate completion!

---

Hy vọng bài viết này đã cung cấp cho bạn một roadmap đầy đủ và chi tiết để chinh phục chủ đề “Describe a person who is very inspiring” trong IELTS Speaking. Nhớ rằng, success trong IELTS Speaking không đến từ việc học thuộc answers, mà đến từ ability to communicate effectively, naturally, và confidently về bất kỳ topic nào. Practice regularly, learn from mistakes, và most importantly, enjoy the process of improving your English communication skills.

Chúc bạn đạt band điểm mong muốn trong kỳ thi IELTS sắp tới!