IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe a Person Who Is Very Knowledgeable” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề miêu tả một người có kiến thức uyên bác là một trong những đề bài phổ biến và thường xuyên xuất hiện trong IELTS Speaking Part 2. Từ năm 2020 đến nay, đề tài về “người có kiến thức” và các biến thể liên quan xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong các kỳ thi thực tế tại Việt Nam cũng như trên toàn cầu. Theo thống kê từ các nguồn uy tín như IELTS-Blog.com và IELTSLiz.com, chủ đề này xuất hiện trung bình 2-3 lần mỗi quý, với khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai được đánh giá ở mức cao.

Điều đặc biệt về chủ đề này là nó không chỉ yêu cầu thí sinh miêu tả một người cụ thể mà còn thể hiện khả năng phân tích về kiến thức, chuyên môn và tác động của việc học hỏi. Đây là cơ hội tuyệt vời để bạn thể hiện vốn từ vựng liên quan đến giáo dục, phát triển cá nhân và các lĩnh vực chuyên môn khác nhau.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được:

• Các câu hỏi thường gặp nhất trong cả 3 Part của IELTS Speaking liên quan đến chủ đề người có kiến thức
• Bài mẫu chi tiết theo từng band điểm từ 6-7, 7.5-8 đến 8.5-9 với phân tích sâu về tiêu chí chấm điểm
• Hơn 50 từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm với phiên âm và ví dụ minh họa
• Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của một examiner chính thức
• Những lỗi phổ biến mà học viên Việt Nam thường mắc phải và cách khắc phục

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về cuộc sống hàng ngày, sở thích và kinh nghiệm cá nhân của bạn. Đây là phần “warm-up” giúp bạn làm quen với giọng nói của examiner và tạo ấn tượng ban đầu tốt.

Chiến lược quan trọng nhất cho Part 1 là trả lời một cách tự nhiên và mở rộng ý trong 2-3 câu. Đừng chỉ trả lời “Yes” hoặc “No” – hãy luôn thêm lý do hoặc ví dụ cụ thể.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn gọn, chỉ một câu đơn
• Sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản và lặp đi lặp lại
• Không đưa ra ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
• Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm do lo lắng

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you like learning new things?

Question 2: What subjects did you enjoy studying at school?

Question 3: Who do you usually ask for advice when you have a problem?

Question 4: Do you prefer learning from books or from people?

Question 5: Have you ever taught someone something you know well?

Question 6: What kind of knowledge do you think is most valuable?

Question 7: Do you think it’s important to have general knowledge about many topics?

Question 8: How do you usually learn about topics that interest you?

Question 9: Who was your favorite teacher and why?

Question 10: Do you think young people today have more access to knowledge than in the past?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

---

Question: Do you like learning new things?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp (Yes/No/It depends)
• Đưa ra lý do hoặc ví dụ cụ thể
• Thêm chi tiết về loại kiến thức bạn thích học

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I do. I think learning new things is interesting and helps me in my work. For example, I recently learned about digital marketing because it’s useful for my job. I usually learn through online videos.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời rõ ràng, có ví dụ cụ thể, cấu trúc câu đúng ngữ pháp
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (interesting, useful), thiếu discourse markers, câu văn chưa đa dạng
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đáp ứng yêu cầu cơ bản nhưng thiếu sự tinh tế trong cách diễn đạt và từ vựng chưa thực sự ấn tượng

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Absolutely! I’m quite passionate about expanding my knowledge base, particularly in areas related to technology and psychology. What I find most rewarding is how learning something new can shift your perspective on everyday situations. For instance, I recently delved into behavioral economics, and it’s completely changed how I understand consumer decisions in my marketing role.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng discourse marker tự nhiên (Absolutely), từ vựng sophisticated (passionate about, expanding my knowledge base, delved into), cấu trúc câu phức tạp với mệnh đề quan hệ, ý tưởng cụ thể và sâu sắc
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Thể hiện fluency tự nhiên, vocabulary range rộng với collocations chính xác, grammar đa dạng, và ideas được develop tốt với specific example

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• passionate about (adj + prep): say mê, đam mê về điều gì
• expanding my knowledge base: mở rộng nền tảng kiến thức
• rewarding (adj): bổ ích, đáng giá
• shift your perspective: thay đổi góc nhìn của bạn
• delve into (phrasal verb): nghiên cứu sâu vào

---

Question: Who do you usually ask for advice when you have a problem?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Xác định người cụ thể (hoặc nhiều người tùy tình huống)
• Giải thích tại sao bạn tin tưởng người đó
• Có thể đưa ra ví dụ về một lần nhờ lời khuyên

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I usually ask my older brother because he has more experience than me. He works in IT and knows a lot about technology and career. He always gives me good advice when I have problems at work.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời đúng trọng tâm, có lý do rõ ràng, structure logic
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng lặp lại (problem/problems, good advice), thiếu variety trong cấu trúc câu
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate vocabulary nhưng thiếu sophistication, grammar đơn giản

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, it really depends on the nature of the problem. For work-related issues, I tend to turn to my mentor, who’s incredibly well-versed in digital marketing strategies. What I really value about her guidance is that she doesn’t just give me direct answers – instead, she helps me think things through by asking the right questions. For personal matters, though, I’d say my mother is my go-to person because of her wealth of life experience.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Natural discourse marker (Well), thể hiện nuanced thinking (it depends), vocabulary sophisticated (well-versed in, wealth of life experience, go-to person), grammar variety với conditional và relative clauses
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluent và coherent, lexical resource đa dạng với precise word choice, grammatical range ấn tượng, ideas developed với specific details và balanced view

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• depends on the nature of: phụ thuộc vào bản chất của
• turn to someone: tìm đến ai đó (để xin lời khuyên)
• well-versed in: am hiểu sâu sắc về
• value about: đánh giá cao về
• think things through: suy nghĩ kỹ càng
• go-to person: người đầu tiên mình nghĩ đến
• wealth of experience: kho tàng kinh nghiệm

Thí sinh IELTS Speaking đang trả lời câu hỏi Part 1 về người có kiến thức

---

Question: Do you prefer learning from books or from people?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Có thể chọn một trong hai, hoặc cân bằng cả hai
• Giải thích ưu điểm của phương pháp bạn chọn
• Đưa ra ví dụ cụ thể

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think I prefer learning from people because it’s more interactive. When I read books, sometimes I don’t understand and can’t ask questions. But when learning from someone, I can discuss and get immediate feedback.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Opinion rõ ràng, có comparison, lý do logical
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng basic (more interactive, immediate feedback), cấu trúc câu đơn giản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates effectively nhưng linguistic resources còn limited

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Honestly, I’d say it’s a combination of both, as each has its distinct advantages. Books allow me to learn at my own pace and revisit complex concepts whenever needed, which is particularly useful for technical subjects. However, learning from knowledgeable people brings a dynamic element – you get real-time clarification, nuanced perspectives, and sometimes even insights that aren’t found in textbooks. I find that the most effective approach is to build a theoretical foundation through reading, then engage with experts to deepen that understanding.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sophisticated discourse marker (Honestly), balanced view thể hiện critical thinking, vocabulary range rộng (distinct advantages, dynamic element, nuanced perspectives), complex sentences với relative clauses và noun phrases, ideas được elaborate rất tốt
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates fluency với natural hesitation device, lexical resource ấn tượng với precise collocations, grammatical structures đa dạng, và coherence cao với clear argumentation

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• combination of both: sự kết hợp của cả hai
• distinct advantages: những lợi thế riêng biệt
• learn at my own pace: học theo tốc độ của riêng mình
• revisit complex concepts: xem lại các khái niệm phức tạp
• dynamic element: yếu tố năng động
• real-time clarification: sự làm rõ ngay lập tức
• nuanced perspectives: các góc nhìn tinh tế
• insights that aren’t found in textbooks: những hiểu biết sâu sắc không tìm thấy trong sách giáo khoa
• build a theoretical foundation: xây dựng nền tảng lý thuyết
• engage with experts: tương tác với các chuyên gia

Khi nói về việc học hỏi từ người khác, bạn có thể tìm hiểu thêm về describe a person who inspires you để có thêm ý tưởng về cách miêu tả những người có ảnh hưởng tích cực đến quá trình phát triển bản thân.

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị và ghi chú. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để thể hiện khả năng nói liên tục và organize ideas một cách logic.

Thời gian chuẩn bị: 1 phút – sử dụng hiệu quả để ghi keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh

Thời gian nói: 2-3 phút – cố gắng nói đủ 2 phút, examiner sẽ dừng bạn lại nếu vượt quá 3 phút

Chiến lược quan trọng:

• Sử dụng hết 1 phút để plan và ghi chú keywords cho mỗi bullet point
• Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trong đề bài
• Nói với tốc độ vừa phải, không quá nhanh
• Sử dụng linking words để kết nối ý
• Đưa ra details và examples cụ thể
• Câu “explain” cuối cùng thường là phần quan trọng nhất

Lỗi thường gặp:

• Không sử dụng hết thời gian chuẩn bị hoặc ghi chú lung tung
• Nói dưới 1.5 phút hoặc dừng giữa chừng
• Bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points
• Nói chung chung, thiếu chi tiết cụ thể
• Lạc đề, nói về những điều không liên quan

Cue Card

Describe A Person Who Is Very Knowledgeable In Their Field

You should say:

• Who this person is
• How you know this person
• What field they are knowledgeable in
• And explain why you think this person is very knowledgeable

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person – miêu tả người

Thì động từ: Hiện tại (vì đề bài dùng “is”) – người này vẫn đang là người có kiến thức

Bullet points phải cover:

• Who: Giới thiệu người đó là ai (tên, tuổi, nghề nghiệp)
• How you know: Mối quan hệ của bạn với người đó
• What field: Lĩnh vực chuyên môn cụ thể
• Why knowledgeable: Đây là phần quan trọng nhất – cần đưa ra evidence và examples cụ thể

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần “explain why you think this person is very knowledgeable” là nơi bạn cần elaboration nhiều nhất. Đừng chỉ nói “because he knows a lot” – hãy đưa ra specific examples, achievements, hoặc situations thể hiện expertise của người đó.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about my uncle, Mr. Hai, who is very knowledgeable in medicine. He’s in his early fifties and works as a cardiologist at a big hospital in Ho Chi Minh City.

I’ve known him since I was a child because he’s my mother’s younger brother. We often meet during family gatherings, and he sometimes tells us interesting stories about his work.

His field is cardiology, which means he specializes in heart problems. He treats patients with various heart conditions and also does research about new treatments. He has been working in this field for more than twenty years.

I think he’s very knowledgeable for several reasons. First, he studied medicine for many years at a prestigious university in Vietnam and also did some training abroad. Second, he reads a lot of medical journals to update his knowledge. I remember once when my father had some chest pain, my uncle could immediately tell what the problem was just by asking a few questions. He explained everything very clearly to us, using simple words so we could understand. Many patients come to see him specifically, and they always say he’s one of the best doctors in the hospital. He also teaches young doctors and medical students, which shows that he really knows his subject well.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có sử dụng linking words cơ bản (First, Second, also), flow tương đối mượt nhưng thiếu variety trong discourse markers. Ý tưởng được organize logical nhưng còn predictable
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng adequate với một số less common words (cardiologist, prestigious, medical journals) nhưng còn nhiều basic vocabulary (very knowledgeable, a lot of, many patients). Collocations đơn giản
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Sử dụng mix của simple và complex sentences. Có relative clauses và conditional nhưng chưa đa dạng. Ít lỗi ngữ pháp cơ bản
Pronunciation	6-7	Giả định pronunciation rõ ràng với một số medical terms được phát âm đúng

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
• ✅ Có examples cụ thể (father’s chest pain)
• ✅ Structure rõ ràng, dễ follow
• ✅ Thời lượng đủ 1.5-2 phút

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Từ vựng còn khá basic ở nhiều chỗ
• ⚠️ Thiếu idiomatic expressions
• ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đủ sophisticated
• ⚠️ Ý tưởng chưa thực sự detailed và impressive

Bác sĩ tim mạch đang tư vấn cho bệnh nhân minh họa cho chủ đề IELTS Speaking về người có kiến thức

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to talk about Dr. Nguyen Thanh Hai, an accomplished cardiologist who I’ve had the privilege of knowing for most of my life. He’s my maternal uncle, currently in his early fifties, and he’s one of the leading experts in cardiovascular medicine at one of Ho Chi Minh City’s most renowned hospitals.

I’ve known him since childhood, as he’s always been a prominent figure in our family. Growing up, I was always fascinated by his dedication to medicine and his ability to explain complex medical concepts in layman’s terms. These days, we catch up regularly during family gatherings, and I often find myself picking his brain about various health-related topics.

His area of expertise is cardiology, specifically interventional cardiology, which involves performing procedures like angioplasty and stent placement. Beyond his clinical work, he’s also actively involved in medical research and has published numerous papers in peer-reviewed journals.

What truly sets him apart and demonstrates his profound knowledge is his holistic approach to patient care. Rather than just treating symptoms, he takes the time to understand the underlying causes and educates patients about lifestyle modifications. I recall a particular incident when my father experienced chest discomfort – my uncle didn’t just jump to conclusions. Instead, he conducted a thorough assessment, asking detailed questions about symptoms, medical history, and lifestyle factors. His diagnostic accuracy was impressive, and he explained the situation using analogies that made everything crystal clear to our family.

Moreover, his colleagues frequently seek his consultation on challenging cases, and he mentors young doctors at the hospital. What I find particularly admirable is his commitment to continuous learning – despite his vast experience, he regularly attends international conferences and stays abreast of the latest medical advancements. His combination of practical experience, theoretical knowledge, and genuine compassion for patients truly makes him an expert in his field.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Flow rất natural với variety of discourse markers, coherence devices sử dụng hiệu quả. Ý tưởng được develop smoothly với clear progression
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range của vocabulary với nhiều less common words và idiomatic phrases (pick his brain, jump to conclusions, sets him apart). Collocations precise và natural
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Consistent use of complex structures including relative clauses, participle phrases, và various tenses. Minimal errors
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Giả định có clear pronunciation với appropriate word stress và intonation

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“very knowledgeable”, “prestigious university”	“accomplished cardiologist”, “leading expert”, “renowned hospital”, “holistic approach”
Grammar	“I think he’s very knowledgeable for several reasons”	“What truly sets him apart and demonstrates his profound knowledge is…”
Ideas	“He explained everything very clearly”	“He conducted a thorough assessment, asking detailed questions about symptoms, medical history, and lifestyle factors”
Development	Surface-level descriptions	Detailed examples với specific medical procedures và personal anecdotes

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to talk about Dr. Nguyen Thanh Hai, an exceptionally accomplished interventional cardiologist who happens to be my maternal uncle. Now in his early fifties, he’s widely regarded as one of the foremost authorities in cardiovascular medicine in Vietnam and has built an impressive reputation both nationally and internationally.

I’ve been fortunate enough to know him throughout my life, as he’s been a constant presence at family gatherings. What’s particularly interesting is how my perception of him has evolved over the years – as a child, I simply knew him as the uncle who told fascinating medical stories; now, as an adult, I’ve come to fully appreciate the depth and breadth of his expertise. We maintain regular contact, and I must say, conversations with him are always intellectually stimulating.

His domain of expertise lies in interventional cardiology, which essentially involves performing minimally invasive procedures to treat cardiovascular conditions. He specializes in complex cases involving coronary angioplasty, stent implantation, and various other catheter-based interventions. Beyond his clinical practice, he’s also deeply involved in clinical research and has contributed substantially to the medical literature with publications in high-impact peer-reviewed journals.

What truly distinguishes him and underscores his profound mastery of the field is his remarkably holistic approach to patient care. Unlike many specialists who focus narrowly on their particular domain, he considers the interconnected nature of cardiovascular health with other bodily systems. I vividly remember an incident that really brought this home – when my father experienced some chest discomfort, rather than immediately ordering a battery of tests, my uncle conducted what I can only describe as a meticulous clinical examination. He asked probing questions about everything from dietary habits and stress levels to sleep patterns and family medical history. His ability to synthesize all this information and arrive at an accurate diagnosis was nothing short of remarkable. More importantly, he didn’t just prescribe medication; he took the time to walk us through the pathophysiology of the condition using brilliantly chosen analogies that made complex cardiovascular processes comprehensible even to those of us without medical backgrounds.

What I find particularly impressive is his unwavering commitment to staying at the cutting edge of medical science. Despite having practiced for over two decades, he approaches his profession with the curiosity of someone just starting out. He regularly attends international conferences, engages with the latest research, and has even pioneered certain techniques at his hospital. His colleagues consistently seek his expertise on complex cases, and he’s instrumental in training the next generation of cardiologists. There’s this palpable respect he commands in the medical community, not just for his technical skills but for his ability to communicate complex ideas with remarkable clarity.

What sets him apart from merely competent doctors is this unique combination of extensive theoretical knowledge, refined practical skills acquired through years of experience, and – perhaps most importantly – a genuine intellectual curiosity that drives him to continually push the boundaries of his understanding. It’s this relentless pursuit of excellence that makes him truly knowledgeable in the fullest sense of the word.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Exceptional fluency với sophisticated discourse markers, seamless flow, và ideas highly developed với exemplary coherence
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Sophisticated vocabulary với precise usage, natural idiomatic language (brought this home, at the cutting edge), và skillful use of less common lexical items
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range of structures với complete flexibility và accuracy. Complex sentences with multiple clauses handled effortlessly
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Giả định có sustained clear pronunciation với full range of pronunciation features

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:

• Flow hoàn toàn natural không có hesitation
• Sử dụng discourse markers sophisticated (What’s particularly interesting, I must say, I vividly remember)
• Self-correction natural (as a child… now, as an adult)

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• “foremost authorities” thay vì “leading experts” – more prestigious
• “domain of expertise” thay vì “area of expertise” – more academic
• “brought this home” – idiomatic expression meaning “made it clear”
• “palpable respect” – very precise adjective choice
• “relentless pursuit of excellence” – sophisticated noun phrase

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• “What truly distinguishes him… is his remarkably holistic approach” – cleft sentence for emphasis
• “Unlike many specialists who focus narrowly…” – comparison với relative clause
• “Despite having practiced for over two decades…” – concessive clause với perfect gerund
• Multiple embedded clauses handled smoothly

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:

• Không chỉ describe mà còn analyze (evolution of perception, interconnected nature)
• Specific examples với medical terminology (coronary angioplasty, pathophysiology)
• Balanced view: technical skills + communication + continuous learning
• Abstract concepts expressed clearly (intellectual curiosity, pursuit of excellence)

Nếu bạn đang tìm kiếm thêm ý tưởng về cách miêu tả những người có ảnh hưởng, bạn có thể tham khảo Describe a person you have recently met để học cách xây dựng câu chuyện về các mối quan hệ mới.

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Sau khi bạn hoàn thành phần nói 2 phút, examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn để kết thúc Part 2 trước khi chuyển sang Part 3. Đây thường là những câu hỏi đơn giản liên quan trực tiếp đến đề bài bạn vừa nói.

---

Question 1: Would you like to work in the same field as this person?

Band 6-7 Answer:
It’s interesting, but I don’t think so. Medicine requires many years of study and I prefer my current field of marketing. However, I really respect what he does.

Band 8-9 Answer:
That’s an interesting thought. While I have tremendous admiration for his profession, I don’t think medicine is my calling. It requires not just intellectual capacity but also emotional resilience that I’m not sure I possess. That said, his dedication to continuous learning has certainly inspired me to adopt a similar approach in my own field.

---

Question 2: Do you think you could become as knowledgeable as this person in your field?

Band 6-7 Answer:
I hope so. I think with hard work and experience, I can become good at what I do. But it will take many years like him.

Band 8-9 Answer:
That’s quite a benchmark to aspire to! I believe with sustained effort and the right mindset, it’s certainly possible to achieve mastery in one’s chosen field. What I’ve learned from observing him is that true expertise isn’t just about accumulating knowledge – it’s about maintaining intellectual curiosity and staying humble enough to keep learning. If I can emulate that approach, I think I can carve out my own area of expertise.

Thí sinh đang chuẩn bị ghi chú cho IELTS Speaking Part 2 về người có kiến thức

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút và là phần thách thức nhất của IELTS Speaking. Đây là cuộc thảo luận sâu hơn về các vấn đề trừu tượng liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2.

Yêu cầu:

• Phân tích, so sánh, đánh giá các vấn đề xã hội
• Đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân có lý lẽ vững chắc
• Xem xét nhiều góc độ của vấn đề (advantages/disadvantages, past/present/future)
• Sử dụng examples từ xã hội, không chỉ kinh nghiệm cá nhân

Chiến lược:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời (3-5 câu trở lên)
• Sử dụng discourse markers để structure câu trả lời (Well, Actually, On the one hand…)
• Đưa ra examples cụ thể từ xã hội, thống kê (nếu biết), hoặc general observations
• Thừa nhận complexity của vấn đề (It depends, There are multiple factors…)
• Không sợ pause để suy nghĩ – điều này natural

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn, chỉ 1-2 câu
• Không develop ý với reasons và examples
• Thiếu từ vựng trừu tượng (abstract nouns)
• Không structure câu trả lời rõ ràng
• Đưa ra opinions quá subjective không có supporting evidence

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Education and Knowledge Acquisition

---

Question 1: What qualities do you think make someone truly knowledgeable in their field?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion question – yêu cầu liệt kê và giải thích qualities
• Key words: qualities, truly knowledgeable
• Cách tiếp cận: Liệt kê 2-3 qualities quan trọng, explain mỗi quality với examples hoặc elaboration

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think there are several important qualities. First, they need to have deep knowledge about their subject, which means they studied it for many years. Second, they should have practical experience, not just theory. For example, a good doctor needs to treat many patients, not just read books. Third, I think they need to keep learning because knowledge always changes. So these are the main qualities I think are important.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có attempt to organize (First, Second, Third) nhưng còn mechanical
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng repetitive (knowledge, important, good) và thiếu sophistication
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Trả lời đúng trọng tâm và có structure nhưng ideas chưa được develop deeply, vocabulary range limited

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, I’d say true expertise is multifaceted and goes beyond just accumulating information.

First and foremost, there’s depth of understanding – truly knowledgeable individuals don’t just know facts; they understand the underlying principles and can explain complex concepts in accessible ways. Think of renowned scientists who can make quantum physics comprehensible to the general public.

Equally important is practical application. Knowledge that remains purely theoretical has limited value. Someone who’s genuinely expert has usually refined their skills through hands-on experience and can apply their knowledge to real-world scenarios. A seasoned surgeon, for instance, has performed countless procedures, not just studied anatomy.

I’d also emphasize the importance of intellectual humility. Paradoxically, the most knowledgeable people are often those who recognize the limits of their understanding. They remain open to new perspectives and acknowledge that their field is constantly evolving. This ongoing commitment to learning is what distinguishes genuine experts from those who simply rest on their laurels.

Lastly, I think communication skills are crucial yet often overlooked. What good is expertise if it can’t be shared effectively? The ability to convey complex ideas clearly demonstrates not just knowledge, but mastery.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Excellent organization với clear signposting (First and foremost, Equally important, Lastly)
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (multifaceted, underlying principles, intellectual humility, rest on their laurels)
• Grammar: Complex structures with relative clauses, conditionals, inversions
• Critical Thinking: Nuanced understanding với paradoxical observation, balanced view

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, First and foremost, Equally important, Lastly
• Tentative language: I’d say, I think, often
• Abstract nouns: expertise, humility, mastery, commitment
• Hedging: usually, often, generally – thể hiện sophisticated thinking

---

Question 2: How has access to information changed the way people learn compared to the past?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare past and present – yêu cầu so sánh
• Key words: access to information, changed, compared to the past
• Cách tiếp cận: Structure rõ ràng: Past situation → Current situation → Impact of change

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

In the past, people learned mainly from books and teachers. They had to go to libraries to find information, which took a lot of time. Now, with the internet, people can find any information quickly on their phones or computers. This makes learning easier and faster. Young people today can learn many things that weren’t available before. However, there is too much information now, so sometimes it’s hard to know what is correct.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic comparison (past vs present) nhưng còn simple
• Vocabulary: Basic words (mainly, quickly, easier, hard)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points nhưng lacks depth và sophistication

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

This is a fascinating question because the transformation has been truly revolutionary.

In the past, learning was largely confined to formal educational settings and physical resources. If you wanted to become knowledgeable about something, you’d need access to libraries, universities, or personal mentors. Information was relatively scarce and centralized, which meant that knowledge acquisition was often a time-consuming and privileged pursuit.

Fast forward to today, and we’re living in what some call the “information age”. The internet has democratized access to knowledge in ways that would have been unimaginable just a generation ago. A student in a rural Vietnamese village can now access the same MIT lectures as someone studying in Cambridge. This unprecedented accessibility has fundamentally altered the learning landscape.

However, and this is crucial, easy access doesn’t automatically translate to better learning. While we have information at our fingertips, we’re also grappling with challenges like information overload and the difficulty of distinguishing credible sources from misinformation. The skill set required for learning has shifted dramatically – it’s less about memorizing facts and more about critical evaluation, synthesizing diverse sources, and navigating the vast digital landscape.

What I find particularly interesting is how this has changed the role of experts. Rather than being gatekeepers of knowledge, they’re increasingly becoming guides who help people make sense of information and develop deeper understanding. So while the medium of learning has changed radically, the need for knowledgeable individuals to provide context and insight remains as important as ever.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized: Past → Present → Challenges → Implications, với clear transitions
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated (democratized, unprecedented, grappling with, gatekeepers)
• Grammar: Complex structures (conditionals, relative clauses, inversions)
• Critical Thinking: Balanced analysis, acknowledges benefits và challenges, provides nuanced conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Fast forward to today, However, What I find particularly interesting
• Tentative language: would have been, some call, increasingly
• Abstract nouns: transformation, accessibility, evaluation, synthesis
• Contrast structures: While… also, less about… and more about

---

Question 3: Do you think traditional education will remain relevant in the future?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Future prediction + Opinion
• Key words: traditional education, remain relevant, future
• Cách tiếp cận: Define traditional education → Consider trends → Give balanced prediction

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think traditional education will still be important in the future. Even though online learning is popular now, schools and universities give students important things like interaction with teachers and friends. Some subjects like medicine or engineering need practical training that cannot be done completely online. However, I think traditional education will need to change and use more technology to stay relevant.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear opinion với some supporting points
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng repetitive (important, need)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses question nhưng analysis thiếu depth

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

This is a complex question that really depends on how we define “traditional education.”

I believe formal educational institutions will certainly remain relevant, but they’ll need to evolve significantly to meet changing needs. What I envision is not a complete displacement of traditional education but rather a hybridization.

On the one hand, certain aspects of traditional education are fundamentally irreplaceable. The structured learning environment, face-to-face interaction with mentors, and collaborative experiences with peers provide something that purely digital learning struggles to replicate. There’s considerable evidence suggesting that these social and interactive elements are crucial for developing critical thinking skills, emotional intelligence, and professional networks. In fields requiring hands-on training – medicine, engineering, performing arts – physical presence remains essential.

That said, traditional education cannot remain static. To stay relevant, institutions will need to embrace flexibility, integrate technology seamlessly, and shift their focus from merely transmitting information to teaching students how to learn, analyze, and adapt. The role of educational institutions might transform from being primary sources of knowledge to becoming spaces for collaborative learning, practical application, and mentorship.

Looking ahead, I think we’ll see a blended model where traditional institutions provide structure, credibility, and social learning environments, while also leveraging digital tools for accessibility and personalization. Universities might become less about attending lectures and more about facilitating problem-solving, fostering creativity, and building communities of learners.

At the end of the day, while the format may change, the fundamental need for structured, quality education guided by knowledgeable educators will endure. The institutions that adapt to contemporary demands while preserving the valuable elements of traditional education will be the ones that remain relevant.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated organization: Define terms → Acknowledge irreplaceable aspects → Discuss necessary changes → Future vision → Conclusion
• Vocabulary: Precise và sophisticated (displacement, hybridization, envision, leverage)
• Grammar: Full range including cleft sentences, conditionals, gerunds, inversions
• Critical Thinking: Highly nuanced với balanced view, acknowledges complexity, evidence-based reasoning

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: On the one hand, That said, Looking ahead, At the end of the day
• Tentative language: I believe, I envision, might, probably
• Hedging devices: certain aspects, There’s considerable evidence, to some extent
• Future forms: will remain, will need to, will see

So sánh giữa học truyền thống và học online minh họa cho Part 3 IELTS Speaking

Theme 2: Expertise and Society

---

Question 4: Why do you think some people are more respected for their knowledge than others?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause and effect – giải thích nguyên nhân
• Key words: respected, knowledge, more than others
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple factors (expertise level, communication, field relevance, contribution to society)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think there are several reasons. First, some people have more qualifications like PhDs or awards, so people respect them more. Second, their knowledge might be more useful for society. For example, doctors and engineers are respected because their work helps many people. Also, if someone is famous or appears on TV, more people will know about them and respect them. Finally, some people can explain things well, so others understand and appreciate their knowledge more.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Listed multiple reasons (First, Second, Also, Finally)
• Vocabulary: Basic và repetitive (respect, knowledge, more)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers multiple points nhưng lacks sophistication và deeper analysis

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

That’s a thought-provoking question that touches on both the nature of expertise and societal values.

I think respect for knowledge is multidimensional and influenced by various factors. First and foremost, there’s the perceived practical value of their expertise. People whose knowledge directly addresses pressing societal needs – medical professionals during a pandemic, climate scientists amid environmental concerns – tend to garner more immediate respect because their expertise has tangible relevance to people’s lives.

Another crucial factor is accessibility of communication. Some experts, despite possessing profound knowledge, struggle to convey their insights in ways that resonate with the general public. Conversely, those who can bridge the gap between specialized knowledge and public understanding – think of someone like Neil deGrasse Tyson in physics or Yuval Noah Harari in history – achieve broader recognition. Their ability to make complex ideas digestible without dumbing them down is a skill in itself.

There’s also a credibility component. Formal credentials, peer-reviewed publications, and institutional affiliations serve as markers of expertise that lend weight to someone’s knowledge. This isn’t necessarily about elitism – these mechanisms help the public distinguish genuine experts from self-proclaimed ones, especially important in an age of misinformation.

I’d also argue that the field itself matters. Society tends to prioritize certain types of knowledge based on contemporary concerns. Technical fields like medicine, technology, and economics often receive more recognition than humanities or arts, not because they’re inherently more valuable, but because their contributions are more immediately quantifiable.

Lastly, there’s an element of visibility and timing. An expert whose knowledge aligns with current public discourse or who has platform access – whether through media, publications, or public speaking – will naturally gain more recognition. It’s somewhat unfortunate that the most respected aren’t always the most knowledgeable, but rather those who are both knowledgeable and visible.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated với multiple well-developed points, each with explanation và examples
• Vocabulary: Precise và varied (multidimensional, tangible relevance, bridge the gap, garner, resonate with)
• Grammar: Complex structures throughout với variety
• Critical Thinking: Nuanced analysis với multiple perspectives, acknowledges complexity, đưa ra examples cụ thể

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: First and foremost, Another crucial factor, Conversely, Lastly
• Tentative language: I think, tend to, somewhat, often
• Abstract nouns: accessibility, credibility, visibility, recognition, discourse
• Balanced view: not because… but because, not necessarily about

---

Question 5: Should companies invest more in training employees to become experts in their fields?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Should question – yêu cầu take a position và justify
• Key words: companies, invest, training, experts
• Cách tiếp cận: State opinion → Benefits → Potential challenges → Conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think companies should invest in employee training. When employees have more skills and knowledge, they can do their jobs better and the company will be more successful. Training also makes employees feel valued, so they will stay with the company longer. However, training costs money and takes time, which can be difficult for small companies. But overall, I believe the benefits are greater than the costs.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear opinion với basic reasons
• Vocabulary: Basic business terms (skills, successful, costs)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses both sides nhưng analysis khá superficial

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Absolutely, and I’d argue this isn’t just beneficial but essential for long-term organizational success.

From a purely pragmatic standpoint, investing in employee expertise yields substantial returns. When staff members develop deep proficiency in their domains, they become more productive, innovative, and capable of solving complex problems. This directly translates to competitive advantages – a company with highly skilled personnel can deliver superior products or services, adapt to market changes more effectively, and maintain high standards of work. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft exemplify this approach, investing heavily in continuous learning programs, and their market positions speak for themselves.

Beyond the immediate business benefits, there’s a significant retention advantage. Employees who feel their professional development is prioritized are considerably more likely to remain with the organization. This reduces turnover costs – which can be substantial when you factor in recruitment, onboarding, and productivity losses. Moreover, cultivating internal expertise creates institutional knowledge that becomes a valuable organizational asset.

However, I should acknowledge the challenges. Training requires significant investment – both financial and in terms of time. There’s also the risk that highly trained employees might leverage their expertise to move to competitors. For smaller enterprises with limited resources, this can seem like a daunting commitment.

That said, I believe these concerns, while valid, shouldn’t deter investment. Companies can mitigate the risk of talent loss through retention strategies like career progression paths and creating engaging work environments. As for costs, the long-term ROI of having expert staff typically far outweighs the initial expenditure. Furthermore, failing to invest in employee development almost guarantees falling behind competitors who do.

In essence, in today’s knowledge economy, human expertise is perhaps the most critical asset any organization possesses. Companies that view employee training as an investment rather than an expense are positioning themselves for sustained success. Those that don’t risk becoming obsolete as their workforce’s skills gradually become outdated.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated argument: Strong opinion → Multiple benefits với details → Acknowledge counterarguments → Refute với solutions → Strong conclusion
• Vocabulary: Business-specific và sophisticated (yields substantial returns, retention advantage, institutional knowledge, ROI, daunting, mitigate)
• Grammar: Full range với conditionals, relative clauses, inversions, gerunds
• Critical Thinking: Comprehensive analysis với balanced consideration, practical examples, addresses counterarguments effectively

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: From a purely pragmatic standpoint, Beyond the immediate benefits, However, That said, In essence
• Strong opinion markers: Absolutely, I’d argue, I believe
• Hedging when appropriate: typically, almost, perhaps
• Cause-effect language: directly translates to, yields, results in

Khi thảo luận về chuyên môn trong công việc, bạn có thể tham khảo thêm về describe a subject you would like to study để hiểu cách diễn đạt về việc học tập và phát triển kỹ năng.

Theme 3: Knowledge and Innovation

---

Question 6: How important is creativity compared to knowledge in professional success?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare and evaluate – so sánh importance
• Key words: creativity, knowledge, professional success
• Cách tiếp cận: Discuss both elements → Explain relationship → Consider different contexts

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think both are important for success. Knowledge is important because you need to understand your field well. But creativity is also necessary because it helps you find new solutions to problems. In some jobs like art and design, creativity is more important. In other jobs like accounting, knowledge might be more important. But actually, the best situation is when someone has both creativity and knowledge together.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Attempts balance nhưng còn simplistic
• Vocabulary: Repetitive (important appears 4 times)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Basic comparison nhưng lacks depth và sophistication

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

This is an excellent question because it touches on a false dichotomy that people often create. In my view, creativity and knowledge aren’t competing forces but rather complementary elements that work in tandem.

Knowledge provides the foundation – you need to understand established principles, existing methodologies, and domain-specific concepts before you can meaningfully innovate. Think of it this way: even the most creative chef needs to understand basic cooking techniques, flavor profiles, and food science. Without this foundational knowledge, creativity becomes mere randomness rather than purposeful innovation.

Conversely, knowledge without creativity can lead to stagnation. Someone might be extraordinarily well-versed in their field but lack the innovative thinking to push boundaries or adapt to changing circumstances. This is particularly evident in rapidly evolving sectors like technology, where yesterday’s best practices can become today’s obsolete methods.

What I find fascinating is how the interplay between these two qualities manifests differently across professions. In research-intensive fields like theoretical physics or medicine, deep knowledge is absolutely foundational, but breakthrough discoveries almost always come from someone who can think creatively about existing knowledge – Einstein’s thought experiments being a classic example. In more traditionally creative fields like marketing or design, creativity might seem predominant, but sustainable success still requires knowledge of consumer psychology, market dynamics, and technical capabilities.

I’d argue that in today’s complex professional landscape, the most successful individuals are those who cultivate both. They possess solid expertise in their domains but also maintain the intellectual flexibility to approach problems from novel angles. This combination is what enables true innovation – grounded creativity, if you will.

Moreover, as automation and AI increasingly handle routine knowledge-based tasks, the distinctly human capacity for creative thinking becomes even more valuable. The future, I believe, belongs to knowledge-empowered creators – people who can leverage their expertise in inventive ways to solve unprecedented challenges.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated discussion: Challenge false dichotomy → Explain each element → Discuss interplay → Context-dependent analysis → Future implications
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (false dichotomy, complementary, work in tandem, stagnation, grounded creativity, leverage)
• Grammar: Complex structures với variety (inversions, conditionals, gerunds, relative clauses)
• Critical Thinking: Nuanced understanding, challenges premise, provides examples, considers multiple contexts, looks at implications

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: In my view, Conversely, What I find fascinating, Moreover
• Academic language: This is particularly evident, I’d argue that, if you will
• Abstract nouns: dichotomy, interplay, stagnation, flexibility, innovation
• Rhetorical devices: Think of it this way, being a classic example

---

Question 7: What role do experts play in addressing global challenges like climate change?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Evaluate role/importance
• Key words: experts, global challenges, climate change
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple roles → Discuss importance → Consider limitations → Balanced view

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Experts play a very important role in solving big problems like climate change. Scientists study climate change and tell us what is happening. They also help governments make policies to reduce pollution. Engineers develop new technologies like solar panels and electric cars. Without experts, we wouldn’t know how serious the problem is or what to do about it. However, experts alone cannot solve these problems – we all need to take action.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic outline của expert roles
• Vocabulary: Simple và repetitive (important, experts, problems)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points nhưng analysis lacks depth

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Experts play absolutely crucial yet multifaceted roles in addressing existential challenges like climate change, though their impact extends beyond just providing solutions.

First and foremost, experts serve as the primary source of evidence-based understanding. Climate scientists gather and analyze data, identify patterns, and forecast trajectories that would be impossible for laypeople to discern. This foundational research is what transforms a vague concern into a well-documented crisis with specific parameters and projected consequences. Without this rigorous scientific work, we’d lack the factual basis for policy decisions and public discourse.

Beyond research, experts play a vital interpretive role. The science behind climate change is inherently complex, involving intricate interactions between atmospheric systems, oceanic patterns, and ecological processes. Scientists who can translate these complexities into accessible explanations help bridge the gap between technical understanding and public awareness. This communication function is critical for mobilizing social and political action.

Furthermore, experts directly contribute to solution development. Engineers devise renewable energy technologies, urban planners design sustainable cities, economists model carbon pricing mechanisms, and agricultural scientists develop climate-resilient crops. These practical innovations are where expertise translates into tangible progress.

However, it’s important to recognize the limitations. Expert knowledge, while essential, isn’t sufficient on its own. Implementation requires political will, economic restructuring, and widespread behavioral change – domains where technical expertise must intersect with social sciences, policy-making, and public engagement. History shows us that purely technocratic approaches to complex problems often fall short without broader societal buy-in.

Moreover, experts can sometimes operate in silos, focusing narrowly on their specializations while missing interconnections between systems. Climate change, for instance, isn’t merely an environmental issue – it’s intertwined with economics, social justice, geopolitics, and ethics. The most effective responses come when experts from diverse fields collaborate and when scientific expertise informs but doesn’t dominate the broader conversation that includes affected communities and diverse stakeholders.

In essence, experts are indispensable – they provide the knowledge foundation, develop solutions, and guide evidence-based action. But they’re most effective when their expertise exists within a collaborative framework that includes policymakers, communities, and the public. The challenge isn’t just about having knowledgeable experts, but about creating systems where expertise can effectively interface with the complex realities of implementation and human behavior.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated: Multiple roles explained → Limitations acknowledged → Interconnected nature discussed → Nuanced conclusion
• Vocabulary: Advanced và precise (multifaceted, existential, intricate, technocratic, indispensable, interface with)
• Grammar: Full range với complex embedding, nominalization, conditionals
• Critical Thinking: Deep analysis với multiple perspectives, acknowledges complexity, considers both strengths và limitations, provides balanced view

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: First and foremost, Beyond research, Furthermore, However, Moreover, In essence
• Hedging and qualifying: while essential, sometimes, often, tends to
• Abstract nouns: implementation, mobilization, intersection, collaboration, framework
• Evaluation language: absolutely crucial, vital, indispensable, most effective

Các chuyên gia đa ngành làm việc cùng nhau giải quyết vấn đề toàn cầu

---

Question 8: Do you think knowledge should be freely shared, or is it acceptable for experts to charge for their expertise?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion về ethical dilemma
• Key words: knowledge, freely shared, charge for expertise
• Cách tiếp cận: Present both perspectives → Consider different contexts → Give nuanced opinion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

This is a difficult question. I think some knowledge should be free, especially basic education and important health information. Everyone should have the right to learn basic things. However, experts spent many years learning their skills, so I think they should be paid for their work. For example, doctors and lawyers need to earn money. Maybe the answer is that basic knowledge should be free, but specialized services can be charged.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Attempts to balance both sides
• Vocabulary: Simple và repetitive (knowledge, free, basic)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Shows awareness của complexity nhưng analysis lacks sophistication

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

This question strikes at a fundamental tension in modern society, and I don’t think there’s a simple answer – it really depends on the context and type of knowledge involved.

On one level, I’m strongly inclined to believe that foundational knowledge – particularly in areas like basic education, public health information, and scientific research that affects humanity broadly – should be freely accessible. The open-source movement in technology and the increasing trend toward open-access academic publishing reflect this philosophy. When knowledge is treated as a public good, it can drive innovation, reduce inequalities, and benefit society collectively. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, for instance, was significantly accelerated by unprecedented data sharing among research institutions.

That said, we need to acknowledge that acquiring expertise requires substantial investment – years of education, ongoing learning, and often significant financial costs. Expecting experts to freely dispense their knowledge in all contexts isn’t sustainable and fails to recognize the economic realities of professional life. A consultant who’s spent decades honing specialized skills has every right to charge for their services, just as authors deserve compensation for books that distill their expertise.

What I think makes sense is a nuanced approach. Certain categories of knowledge – particularly those essential for basic welfare, public safety, or addressing urgent societal challenges – should be widely accessible, ideally subsidized by governments or institutions. Simultaneously, experts should be able to monetize their expertise through consulting, specialized services, or proprietary applications of knowledge.

The key distinction, in my view, lies between knowledge as abstract information versus knowledge as applied expertise. A medical researcher’s findings about disease mechanisms should be publicly available, but a specialist physician’s diagnostic acumen and treatment planning for individual patients justifiably commands professional fees. An economist’s theoretical frameworks might be freely shared in academic journals, but their strategic advice to corporations can be appropriately compensated.

Moreover, we should consider alternative models. Many experts contribute to freely available resources – open educational platforms, public lectures, or pro bono work – while also maintaining paid services. This hybrid approach allows knowledge dissemination while ensuring sustainability of expertise development.

Ultimately, I believe the question isn’t whether experts should charge but what knowledge should be freely accessible and what mechanisms we can create to ensure that critical knowledge reaches those who need it while still rewarding those who generate and apply it.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated argument: Present complexity → Free knowledge argument → Paid expertise argument → Nuanced middle ground → Distinction between types → Alternative models → Thoughtful conclusion
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (strikes at, fundamental tension, honing, distill, monetize, acumen, pro bono)
• Grammar: Full range với complex structures, conditionals, nominalizations
• Critical Thinking: Highly nuanced với consideration của multiple perspectives, ethical dimensions, practical considerations, proposes balanced solutions

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: On one level, That said, What I think makes sense, Moreover, Ultimately
• Tentative language: I’m inclined to believe, I think, in my view, might
• Academic expressions: strikes at a fundamental tension, reflects this philosophy, justifiably commands
• Balanced language: On one hand… Simultaneously, not whether… but what

Để khám phá thêm về cách thể hiện sự sáng tạo trong công việc và học tập, bạn có thể xem Describe a time when you did something creative để học cách kết hợp kiến thức với tư duy đổi mới.

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
knowledgeable	adj	/ˈnɒlɪdʒəbl/	có kiến thức, am hiểu	She’s extremely knowledgeable about ancient history.	highly knowledgeable, very knowledgeable, remarkably knowledgeable, incredibly knowledgeable
expertise	n	/ˌekspɜːˈtiːz/	chuyên môn, kiến thức chuyên sâu	His expertise in cybersecurity is widely recognized.	develop expertise, demonstrate expertise, area of expertise, technical expertise, professional expertise
proficiency	n	/prəˈfɪʃənsi/	sự thành thạo, trình độ cao	Her proficiency in multiple languages is impressive.	achieve proficiency, demonstrate proficiency, high level of proficiency, develop proficiency
mastery	n	/ˈmɑːstəri/	sự tinh thông, làm chủ hoàn toàn	He has achieved complete mastery of his craft.	achieve mastery, demonstrate mastery, mastery of a subject, complete mastery
well-versed in	adj phrase	/wel vɜːst ɪn/	am hiểu sâu sắc về	She’s well-versed in contemporary literature.	particularly well-versed, highly well-versed, extremely well-versed
accomplished	adj	/əˈkʌmplɪʃt/	có thành tựu, tài năng	He’s an accomplished pianist and composer.	highly accomplished, accomplished professional, accomplished expert
authority	n	/ɔːˈθɒrəti/	chuyên gia hàng đầu, người có uy tín	She’s a leading authority on climate science.	leading authority, recognized authority, foremost authority, acknowledged authority
depth of knowledge	n phrase	/depθ əv ˈnɒlɪdʒ/	chiều sâu kiến thức	His depth of knowledge in neuroscience is remarkable.	demonstrate depth, considerable depth, impressive depth, extensive depth
domain	n	/dəˈmeɪn/	lĩnh vực, phạm vi chuyên môn	He’s an expert in the domain of artificial intelligence.	domain of expertise, specialized domain, specific domain, technical domain
theoretical foundation	n phrase	/ˌθɪəˈretɪkl faʊnˈdeɪʃn/	nền tảng lý thuyết	Strong theoretical foundation is essential for research.	solid foundation, build a foundation, establish foundation, strong foundation
hands-on experience	n phrase	/hændz ɒn ɪkˈspɪəriəns/	kinh nghiệm thực hành	The program provides hands-on experience in clinical settings.	gain hands-on experience, provide hands-on experience, valuable hands-on experience
practical application	n phrase	/ˈpræktɪkl ˌæplɪˈkeɪʃn/	ứng dụng thực tế	The course focuses on practical application of theories.	practical application of knowledge, direct application, real-world application
insightful	adj	/ˈɪnsaɪtfl/	sâu sắc, có nhận thức sâu	Her analysis of the situation was extremely insightful.	highly insightful, remarkably insightful, particularly insightful
nuanced understanding	n phrase	/ˈnjuːɑːnst ˌʌndəˈstændɪŋ/	sự hiểu biết tinh tế, nhiều sắc thái	He has a nuanced understanding of complex political issues.	develop nuanced understanding, demonstrate nuanced understanding, deep nuanced understanding
cutting-edge	adj	/ˌkʌtɪŋ ˈedʒ/	tiên tiến nhất, tân tiến	She works with cutting-edge technology in genetics.	cutting-edge research, cutting-edge technology, cutting-edge knowledge, cutting-edge developments
state-of-the-art	adj	/ˌsteɪt əv ðə ˈɑːt/	hiện đại nhất, tiên tiến nhất	The laboratory has state-of-the-art equipment.	state-of-the-art facilities, state-of-the-art technology, state-of-the-art knowledge
groundbreaking	adj	/ˈɡraʊndbreɪkɪŋ/	đột phá, mang tính cách mạng	Her groundbreaking research changed the field.	groundbreaking work, groundbreaking research, groundbreaking discovery, groundbreaking contribution
pioneering	adj	/ˌpaɪəˈnɪərɪŋ/	tiên phong, đi đầu	He did pioneering work in renewable energy.	pioneering research, pioneering work, pioneering effort, pioneering approach
erudite	adj	/ˈeruːdaɪt/	uyên bác, có học thức sâu rộng	She’s an erudite scholar with extensive publications.	erudite scholar, erudite expert, erudite discussion, remarkably erudite
scholarly	adj	/ˈskɒləli/	có tính học thuật, thuộc về học giả	His scholarly approach to the subject is admirable.	scholarly work, scholarly research, scholarly publication, scholarly approach

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
at the forefront of	đi đầu trong lĩnh vực	She’s at the forefront of cancer research.	7.5-9
second to none	không ai sánh bằng, tốt nhất	His knowledge of classical music is second to none.	7.5-9
be well-grounded in	có nền tảng vững chắc về	He’s well-grounded in both theory and practice.	7.5-9
go the extra mile	nỗ lực hết mình, làm nhiều hơn mong đợi	She always goes the extra mile to help her students understand.	7.5-8.5
know something inside out	hiểu biết thấu đáo	He knows the legal system inside out.	7.5-8.5
a mine of information	kho tàng thông tin	My professor is a mine of information on European history.	7.5-8.5
stay abreast of	cập nhật, theo kịp	She stays abreast of the latest developments in her field.	7.5-9
break new ground	tạo ra bước đột phá mới	His research is breaking new ground in neuroscience.	7.5-9
push the boundaries	mở rộng giới hạn, đột phá	Great experts push the boundaries of what’s possible.	7.5-9
set the bar high	đặt ra tiêu chuẩn cao	She sets the bar high for academic excellence.	7-8.5
be in a league of one’s own	ở đẳng cấp riêng, khác biệt	When it comes to biotechnology, he’s in a league of his own.	8-9
command respect	được tôn trọng, kính nể	His expertise commands respect throughout the industry.	7.5-8.5
leave no stone unturned	không bỏ sót điều gì, tìm tòi kỹ lưỡng	She leaves no stone unturned in her research.	7.5-8.5
be a cut above	vượt trội hơn	His understanding of the subject is a cut above the rest.	7.5-8.5
ahead of the curve	dẫn đầu, tiên phong	She’s always ahead of the curve in adopting new methodologies.	7.5-9
encyclopedic knowledge	kiến thức bách khoa, rộng và sâu	He has encyclopedic knowledge of world literature.	8-9

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ ngắn, tạo sự tự nhiên
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc sự thật bất ngờ
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi nói thật lòng, thành thật
• 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Từ góc nhìn của tôi
• 📝 The way I see it,… – Theo cách tôi nhìn nhận

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
• 📝 Furthermore,… – Hơn nữa (formal hơn)
• 📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó
• 📝 Besides that,… – Bên cạnh đó

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét
• 📝 That said,… – Tuy nhiên, điều đó đã được nói
• 📝 Having said that,… – Sau khi đã nói điều đó
• 📝 Conversely,… – Ngược lại

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng
• 📝 In essence,… – Về bản chất
• 📝 To sum up,… – Tóm lại

Để nhấn mạnh:

• 📝 What’s particularly interesting is… – Điều đặc biệt thú vị là
• 📝 The key point here is… – Điểm mấu chốt ở đây là
• 📝 What I find most impressive is… – Điều tôi thấy ấn tượng nhất là
• 📝 It’s worth noting that… – Đáng chú ý là

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional:

• Formula: If + Past Perfect, … would + Verb (present result of past condition)
• Ví dụ: If he hadn’t pursued his doctorate, he wouldn’t be the expert he is today.

Inversion (Đảo ngữ):

• Formula: Had + Subject + Past Participle
• Ví dụ: Had she not dedicated years to research, she wouldn’t have achieved such expertise.

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

• Formula: …, which/who + clause, …
• Ví dụ: Dr. Nguyen, who has published over 50 papers, is considered a leading authority.

Reduced relative clauses:

• Formula: Subject + V-ing/Past participle
• Ví dụ: Experts possessing deep knowledge can explain complex concepts simply.

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive:

• It is thought/believed/said that…
• Ví dụ: It is widely believed that continuous learning is essential for maintaining expertise.

By + agent (khi cần nhấn mạnh):

• Ví dụ: The theory was developed by scientists who spent decades researching.

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ – để nhấn mạnh):

What clause:

• Formula: What + Subject + Verb… is/was…
• Ví dụ: What I find most admirable about him is his commitment to sharing knowledge.

It clause:

• Formula: It is/was… that/who…
• Ví dụ: It was his dedication to continuous learning that made him an expert.

The thing that:

• Formula: The thing that + clause… is…
• Ví dụ: The thing that sets her apart is her ability to simplify complex concepts.

5. Nominalization (Danh từ hóa):

• Thay vì: “He knows a lot and that helps him”
• Dùng: “His extensive knowledge contributes to his success”
• Ví dụ: The acquisition of expertise requires sustained commitment. (thay vì “acquiring expertise requires that you commit”)

6. Participle Clauses:

• Having + Past Participle:
• Ví dụ: Having studied medicine for over a decade, she possesses remarkable diagnostic skills.

7. Inversion for Emphasis:

• Not only… but also:

• Ví dụ: Not only does he have theoretical knowledge, but he also has extensive practical experience.

• Rarely/Seldom at the beginning:

• Ví dụ: Rarely have I met someone with such profound understanding of the subject.

Để tìm hiểu thêm về cách miêu tả những người đặc biệt trong cuộc sống, bạn có thể xem Describe a person who is very knowledgeable để khám phá nhiều góc độ khác nhau về chủ đề này.

Chiến Lược Chuẩn Bị và Luyện Tập

1. Xây Dựng Ngân Hàng Ý Tưởng

Brainstorm về người có kiến thức trong cuộc sống bạn:

• Giáo viên, giảng viên đại học
• Người thân (cha mẹ, chú bác trong gia đình)
• Đồng nghiệp, sếp tại công ty
• Chuyên gia bạn theo dõi trên mạng xã hội
• Bác sĩ, luật sư, kế toán từng tư vấn cho bạn

Lập danh sách chi tiết:

• Tên và vai trò của họ
• Lĩnh vực chuyên môn cụ thể
• Thành tựu, bằng cấp, kinh nghiệm
• Tình huống cụ thể thể hiện expertise
• Cảm nhận và đánh giá của bạn về họ

2. Phát Triển Từ Vựng Theo Chủ Đề

Tạo flashcards cho các nhóm từ:

• Medical expertise vocabulary
• Academic/Research terminology
• Business/Professional terms
• Teaching and education expressions
• Technical skills descriptions

Luyện tập collocations:

• Không chỉ học từ đơn lẻ mà học cụm từ đi kèm
• Ví dụ: không chỉ “knowledge” mà “depth of knowledge”, “extensive knowledge”, “acquire knowledge”

Ghi chú pronunciation:

• Đặc biệt chú ý các từ technical: methodology /ˌmeθəˈdɒlədʒi/, proficiency /prəˈfɪʃənsi/
• Luyện word stress và sentence stress

3. Luyện Structure và Coherence

Part 1 Practice:

• Mỗi câu trả lời = Direct answer + Reason + Example (2-3 câu)
• Luyện tập không ngừng lại sau câu đầu tiên
• Record và nghe lại để kiểm tra fluency

Part 2 Practice:

• Thực hành với timer: 1 phút chuẩn bị + 2 phút nói
• Ghi chú keywords chứ không viết câu
• Đảm bảo cover tất cả bullet points
• Luyện linking words để kết nối ý mượt mà

Part 3 Practice:

• Luyện tư duy phản biện: mỗi ý kiến cần có counterargument
• Thực hành structure: Opinion → Reason 1 → Example → Reason 2 → Example → Conclusion
• Luyện abstract thinking: từ specific examples lên general principles

4. Khắc Phục Lỗi Phổ Biến

Lỗi Fluency:

• Vấn đề: Dừng quá nhiều, repetition, self-correction excessive
• Giải pháp: Luyện shadowing với podcasts, practice speaking về topic 5-10 phút mỗi ngày

Lỗi Vocabulary:

• Vấn đề: Overuse của “very”, “good”, “important”, “interesting”
• Giải pháp: Tạo synonym list, học paraphrase, đọc sample answers band cao

Lỗi Grammar:

• Vấn đề: Subject-verb agreement errors, tense confusion, article mistakes
• Giải pháp: Record speaking, transcribe, identify patterns of errors, focused practice

Lỗi Pronunciation:

• Vấn đề: Vietnamese accent ảnh hưởng (v/w confusion, final consonants, stress patterns)
• Giải pháp: Minimal pairs practice, shadowing native speakers, focus on word stress

5. Lịch Trình Luyện Tập Đề Xuất

4 tuần trước thi:

Tuần 1: Foundation

• Ngày 1-2: Học vocabulary topic-specific (20-30 từ/ngày)
• Ngày 3-4: Luyện Part 1 questions (10-15 câu)
• Ngày 5-6: Viết outline cho Part 2, practice 1-2 cue cards
• Ngày 7: Review và record speaking

Tuần 2: Development

• Ngày 1-2: Học advanced expressions và idioms
• Ngày 3-4: Luyện Part 2 với timer, tập trung fluency
• Ngày 5-6: Part 3 questions – luyện extended answers
• Ngày 7: Mock test đầy đủ 3 parts (11-14 phút)

Tuần 3: Refinement

• Ngày 1-2: Phân tích lỗi từ mock tests
• Ngày 3-4: Luyện pronunciation và intonation
• Ngày 5-6: Practice với different perspectives (compare viewpoints)
• Ngày 7: Mock test + feedback

Tuần 4: Consolidation

• Ngày 1-3: Review tất cả vocabulary, thực hành topics khó
• Ngày 4-5: 2-3 mock tests đầy đủ
• Ngày 6: Light practice, review notes
• Ngày 7: Nghỉ ngơi, mental preparation

6. Mindset và Chiến Thuật Trong Phòng Thi

Trước khi vào phòng thi:

• Đến sớm 15-20 phút để làm quen môi trường
• Thở sâu, relax shoulders, positive self-talk
• Review mental checklist: smile, eye contact, confidence

Trong phòng thi:

• Part 1: Maintain eye contact, smile naturally, show interest
• Part 2: Sử dụng đầy đủ 1 phút prep time, look at examiner occasionally khi nói
• Part 3: Take time to think (1-2 giây là OK), dùng discourse markers tự nhiên

Xử lý tình huống khó:

• Không hiểu câu hỏi: “I’m sorry, could you please repeat that?” hoặc “Do you mean…?”
• Không biết từ vựng: Paraphrase (use alternative expressions)
• Blank mind: Sử dụng fillers tự nhiên “Well, let me think…”, “That’s an interesting question…”
• Nói lạc đề: Self-correct ngay: “Actually, what I mean to say is…”

Những điều NÊN làm:

• ✅ Speak naturally với appropriate pace
• ✅ Show enthusiasm about topic
• ✅ Develop answers với reasons và examples
• ✅ Use a range of vocabulary và grammar
• ✅ Maintain good pronunciation và fluency
• ✅ Make eye contact và engage with examiner

Những điều KHÔNG NÊN:

• ❌ Học thuộc answers và recite mechanically
• ❌ Sử dụng overly complex vocabulary không natural
• ❌ Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm
• ❌ Give one-word answers hoặc quá ngắn
• ❌ Argue với examiner
• ❌ Show frustration hoặc negative attitude

Chiến lược và tips cho IELTS Speaking test

Kết Luận

Chủ đề “Describe a person who is very knowledgeable in their field” là một trong những đề bài phổ biến và đa dụng trong IELTS Speaking. Việc chuẩn bị kỹ lưỡng cho topic này không chỉ giúp bạn tự tin khi gặp đề bài này mà còn trang bị vocabulary và ideas cho nhiều chủ đề liên quan khác như education, career, role models, và skills.

Những điểm quan trọng cần nhớ:

Về nội dung:

• Chọn một người cụ thể mà bạn thực sự biết rõ để có thể nói chi tiết và tự nhiên
• Chuẩn bị specific examples và situations thể hiện expertise của người đó
• Không chỉ miêu tả mà phải explain và analyze tại sao họ knowledgeable

Về ngôn ngữ:

• Sử dụng topic-specific vocabulary chính xác (expertise, proficiency, mastery…)
• Tích hợp idiomatic expressions một cách tự nhiên
• Đa dạng grammatical structures, đặc biệt là complex sentences
• Maintain fluency với appropriate discourse markers

Về chiến lược:

• Part 1: Extend answers nhưng không quá dài (2-3 câu)
• Part 2: Cover tất cả bullet points, nói đủ 2 phút với details
• Part 3: Develop abstract thinking, consider multiple perspectives

Lộ trình học tập:

1. Xây dựng vocabulary foundation với flashcards và collocations
2. Practice regularly với timer và recording
3. Analyze sample answers ở nhiều band levels
4. Get feedback từ teachers hoặc study partners
5. Mock tests để làm quen với exam pressure

Hãy nhớ rằng IELTS Speaking đánh giá khả năng giao tiếp thực tế của bạn, không phải khả năng học thuộc. Examiner muốn thấy bạn có thể express ideas một cách tự nhiên, coherent, và với appropriate language. Confidence, authenticity, và genuine engagement với topic sẽ tạo ấn tượng tốt hơn nhiều so với việc recite một bài học thuộc hoàn hảo nhưng không có linh hồn.

Chúc bạn tự tin và đạt được band điểm mong muốn trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking sắp tới!