IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe A Person Who Is Very Talented” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề miêu tả một người có tài năng trong lĩnh vực chuyên môn là một trong những đề bài phổ biến nhất trong IELTS Speaking Part 2. Theo thống kê từ các kỳ thi thực tế, chủ đề này xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong các đề thi từ năm 2022 đến nay, đặc biệt trong quý 1 và quý 3 hàng năm. Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai vẫn ở mức cao do tính ứng dụng thực tế và khả năng đánh giá toàn diện kỹ năng ngôn ngữ của thí sinh.

Chủ đề này quan trọng vì nó cho phép giám khảo đánh giá khả năng miêu tả chi tiết về con người, sử dụng từ vựng liên quan đến nghề nghiệp, tài năng, thành tựu, cũng như khả năng diễn đạt cảm xúc và đánh giá cá nhân. Các góc độ thường được hỏi bao gồm: miêu tả kỹ năng chuyên môn, quá trình phát triển tài năng, ảnh hưởng của người đó đến bản thân hoặc xã hội, và so sánh giữa tài năng bẩm sinh với nỗ lực rèn luyện.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được cách trả lời hiệu quả cho cả 3 Part của bài thi Speaking với chủ đề này, bao gồm 15+ câu hỏi thường gặp kèm bài mẫu chi tiết theo các band điểm 6-7, 7.5-8, và 8.5-9. Bạn cũng sẽ nắm vững hơn 50 từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm, cùng với các chiến lược trả lời từ góc nhìn của một examiner chính thức. Khi nắm vững cách trả lời chủ đề này, bạn cũng có thể áp dụng tương tự cho describe a time when you helped someone improve their skills để mở rộng vốn ý tưởng của mình.

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về cuộc sống hàng ngày, sở thích, công việc hoặc học tập. Đây là phần “làm quen” giúp bạn thư giãn trước khi vào các phần khó hơn. Chiến lược hiệu quả nhất là trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, sau đó mở rộng thêm 1-2 câu với lý do hoặc ví dụ cụ thể.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 1:

• Trả lời quá ngắn gọn chỉ “Yes” hoặc “No” mà không giải thích
• Sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “bad”, “like”, “don’t like”
• Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
• Nói quá dài làm giám khảo phải ngắt lời

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you think you have any special talents or skills?

Question 2: What kind of talented people do you admire most?

Question 3: Is there anyone in your family who is particularly talented?

Question 4: Do you think talent is more important than hard work?

Question 5: Have you ever tried to learn a skill that you weren’t naturally good at?

Question 6: What talents would you like to develop in the future?

Question 7: Do you think children should focus on developing their talents from a young age?

Question 8: Are there any talented people in your country who are famous internationally?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

---

Question: Do you think you have any special talents or skills?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có hay không
• Nêu tên tài năng/kỹ năng cụ thể
• Đưa ra ví dụ ngắn gọn về cách bạn sử dụng kỹ năng đó

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think I’m quite good at languages. I can speak English and a bit of Chinese. I learned them at school and through watching movies. It helps me communicate with people from different countries.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời rõ ràng, có ví dụ cụ thể về kỹ năng ngôn ngữ
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng khá cơ bản (“quite good at”, “a bit of”), cấu trúc câu đơn giản, thiếu chi tiết về mức độ thành thạo
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đủ coherence và clarity nhưng chưa demonstrate được lexical range hoặc grammatical complexity

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, I’d say I have a knack for languages. I’m fairly proficient in English and intermediate in Mandarin Chinese, which I’ve been studying for about five years. What I find particularly rewarding is being able to bridge communication gaps between people from different cultural backgrounds, especially in my work as a customer service representative dealing with international clients.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng collocations tự nhiên (“have a knack for”, “fairly proficient in”, “bridge communication gaps”), cấu trúc câu phức tạp với relative clause, ý tưởng được phát triển đầy đủ với context về công việc
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluent, vocabulary sophisticated và precise, grammar đa dạng, ý tưởng được elaborated một cách tự nhiên không gượng ép

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• have a knack for (something): có khiếu, có tài về điều gì đó
• fairly proficient in: khá thành thạo trong
• bridge communication gaps: kết nối khoảng cách giao tiếp
• particularly rewarding: đặc biệt bổ ích/có ý nghĩa

---

Question: What kind of talented people do you admire most?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu loại người tài năng cụ thể
• Giải thích tại sao bạn ngưỡng mộ họ
• Có thể đưa ra ví dụ ngắn về một người như vậy

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I admire people who are talented in music, especially pianists. I think playing piano is very difficult and needs a lot of practice. My neighbor is a piano teacher and she can play very beautifully. I always enjoy listening to her practice.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có ví dụ cụ thể từ đời sống thực tế, trả lời đầy đủ câu hỏi
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng lặp lại (“very”), thiếu từ vựng chuyên ngành về âm nhạc, chưa giải thích sâu lý do ngưỡng mộ
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response nhưng chưa impressive về vocabulary và idea development

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I have immense respect for people who excel in the arts, particularly musicians and visual artists. What I find most admirable is their ability to evoke emotions and provoke thought through their work. For instance, I’m fascinated by concert pianists who can convey complex narratives through their interpretation of classical pieces. It requires not just technical mastery but also profound emotional intelligence to connect with audiences on such a deep level.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary tinh vi và topic-specific (“immense respect for”, “excel in”, “evoke emotions”, “technical mastery”, “emotional intelligence”), grammar phức tạp với embedded clauses, ý tưởng sâu sắc về mối quan hệ giữa kỹ thuật và cảm xúc
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates sophisticated language control, ideas are well-developed với abstract thinking, natural và fluent

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• have immense respect for: vô cùng tôn trọng, ngưỡng mộ
• excel in: xuất sắc trong lĩnh vực
• evoke emotions: gợi lên cảm xúc
• technical mastery: sự thành thạo về mặt kỹ thuật
• profound emotional intelligence: trí tuệ cảm xúc sâu sắc

---

Question: Do you think talent is more important than hard work?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đưa ra quan điểm rõ ràng hoặc balanced view
• Giải thích reasoning của bạn
• Đưa ra ví dụ để minh họa

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think both are important. Talent helps you start faster, but hard work is necessary to become really good. For example, someone with natural talent for sports still needs to practice every day. Without practice, they can’t become professional.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có quan điểm cân bằng, logic rõ ràng, có ví dụ về thể thao
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng cơ bản (“really good”, “become professional”), thiếu nuance trong argument
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear communication nhưng lacks sophistication trong cách diễn đạt và depth of ideas

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“That’s an interesting question, and I’d say it’s not really an either-or situation. While innate talent certainly gives people a head start, I believe sustained effort and dedication are what ultimately separate the good from the great. Take athletes, for instance. You might have natural aptitude for running, but without rigorous training and mental resilience, you won’t reach Olympic levels. Talent sets the foundation, but hard work builds the structure, if you will.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Discourse markers natural (“That’s an interesting question”, “if you will”), vocabulary sophisticated (“innate talent”, “sustained effort”, “separate the good from the great”, “mental resilience”), structure phức tạp với metaphor cuối cùng, shows critical thinking với balanced perspective
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluent and coherent, wide range of vocabulary used naturally, complex grammar, ideas are nuanced và well-articulated

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• innate talent: tài năng bẩm sinh
• a head start: lợi thế ban đầu
• sustained effort and dedication: nỗ lực và sự cống hiến bền bỉ
• separate the good from the great: phân biệt giữa người giỏi và người xuất sắc
• mental resilience: sức bền tinh thần

So sánh tài năng bẩm sinh và nỗ lực rèn luyện trong IELTS Speaking chủ đề người tài năng

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị và ghi chú. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất vì giám khảo có thể đánh giá toàn diện khả năng duy trì câu chuyện, sử dụng từ vựng đa dạng, và cấu trúc ngữ pháp phức tạp của bạn.

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

• Sử dụng đầy đủ 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Nói tối thiểu 1.5 phút, lý tưởng là 2-2.5 phút
• Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points trong cue card
• Sử dụng thì quá khứ nếu kể về người bạn đã biết, thì hiện tại nếu vẫn duy trì mối quan hệ
• Mở rộng phần “explain” vì đây là nơi bạn ghi điểm cao nhất

Lỗi thường gặp:

• Lãng phí thời gian chuẩn bị, không ghi chú gì
• Nói dưới 1.5 phút rồi im lặng
• Bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points
• Nói văn viết, không tự nhiên
• Không phát triển phần “explain why”

Cue Card

Describe A Person Who Is Very Talented In Their Profession

You should say:

• Who this person is
• What their profession is
• How you know about this person/their talent
• And explain why you think they are very talented

Phân Tích Đề Bài

• Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person – yêu cầu miêu tả chi tiết về một cá nhân cụ thể
• Thì động từ: Chủ yếu là hiện tại đơn và hiện tại hoàn thành (nếu người đó vẫn đang hoạt động trong nghề), có thể dùng quá khứ đơn khi kể về lần đầu biết đến họ
• Bullet points phải cover:
  • Danh tính người đó (tên, tuổi, nghề nghiệp)
  • Nghề nghiệp cụ thể và họ làm gì
  • Cách bạn biết đến họ (qua truyền thông, trực tiếp, qua người khác)
  • Lý do tại sao họ talented (thành tựu, kỹ năng đặc biệt, ảnh hưởng)
• Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là phần giúp bạn demonstrate vocabulary về achievements, skills, impact và personal qualities. Đừng chỉ liệt kê thành tích mà hãy phân tích tại sao những điều đó chứng minh tài năng

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

“I’d like to talk about my English teacher, Ms. Lan, who I think is very talented in her profession.

Ms. Lan has been teaching English for about 15 years at my high school. She teaches different levels, from beginners to advanced students. I got to know her when I was in grade 10, and she was my teacher for three years.

What makes her talented is that she has a special way of teaching. She doesn’t just follow the textbook. Instead, she uses games, videos, and real-life situations to help us learn. Her classes are always interesting and never boring. She can explain difficult grammar rules in a simple way that everyone can understand.

Another thing is that she really cares about her students. She knows each student’s strengths and weaknesses. If someone is struggling, she gives them extra help after class. Many students who were bad at English became much better because of her teaching.

Ms. Lan also speaks English very fluently and naturally. She has a British accent and uses idiomatic expressions that make her sound like a native speaker. She studied in the UK for two years, so her English is really good.

I think she’s talented because she combines good English skills with excellent teaching methods. Not all people who speak English well can teach it effectively, but she can do both. Her students always get high scores in exams, and many of them have gone on to study abroad. That’s why I really admire her as a talented professional.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có linking words cơ bản (another thing, instead), ideas được connect nhưng chưa sophisticated. Một số hesitation nhẹ có thể xảy ra
Lexical Resource	6-7	Vocabulary adequate (struggling, strengths and weaknesses, idiomatic expressions) nhưng có repetition (really good, very talented). Thiếu less common words
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Mix của simple và complex sentences. Có relative clauses (who were bad at) nhưng structures chưa đa dạng. Phần lớn accurate
Pronunciation	6-7	Generally clear và comprehensible. Có thể có một số lỗi về word stress nhưng không ảnh hưởng hiểu nghĩa

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
• ✅ Có ví dụ cụ thể về teaching methods và impact
• ✅ Structure rõ ràng, dễ theo dõi
• ✅ Đủ độ dài (khoảng 1.5-2 phút)

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary chưa impressive, nhiều từ cơ bản
• ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đa dạng, thiếu conditionals, passive voice
• ⚠️ Ideas về talent chưa deep, chủ yếu surface-level descriptions

Tương tự như cách miêu tả về giáo viên có tài năng này, bạn cũng có thể áp dụng kỹ thuật này khi trả lời describe a time when you received an unexpected compliment để tạo sự liên kết trong câu chuyện.

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

“I’d like to tell you about Dr. Nguyen Anh Tuan, who is an exceptionally talented cardiac surgeon working at one of Vietnam’s leading hospitals.

Dr. Tuan specializes in minimally invasive heart surgery, which is a highly complex field requiring extraordinary precision and expertise. I first learned about him through a documentary that featured his groundbreaking work in performing complicated procedures that many other surgeons considered too risky. What really caught my attention was how he had successfully operated on patients who had been turned away by multiple hospitals.

What makes him stand out in his field is not just his technical prowess, but his innovative approach to surgery. He’s been instrumental in introducing several cutting-edge techniques to Vietnam, which have significantly improved patient outcomes and reduced recovery times. For instance, he pioneered a particular technique that allows patients to go home within three days instead of the typical two-week hospital stay.

Beyond his surgical skills, Dr. Tuan demonstrates remarkable dedication to his patients. Despite his busy schedule, he personally follows up with each patient during their recovery, and he’s known for going the extra mile to ensure they understand their condition and treatment options. Colleagues describe him as someone who combines brilliance with compassion, which is quite rare in such a demanding profession.

I think what truly makes him talented is his holistic approach to medicine. He doesn’t just treat symptoms; he takes into account the patient’s overall wellbeing, including their mental health and family situation. He also devotes considerable time to training younger surgeons, essentially passing on his expertise to the next generation. His work has earned him numerous awards, including recognition from international medical associations.

The reason I hold him in such high regard is that he represents the perfect blend of technical mastery, innovation, and humanity. In a field where lives literally hang in the balance, having someone with both the skill and the compassion he possesses is truly exceptional.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Speaks fluently với minimal hesitation. Uses a range of cohesive devices naturally (Beyond, For instance, Despite). Ideas progress logically
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range of vocabulary (exceptional, pioneered, instrumental in, holistic approach). Uses collocations accurately. Some less common idiomatic phrases
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Good range of complex structures (relative clauses, participle clauses, passive forms). Generally accurate với occasional minor errors
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear pronunciation with appropriate stress và intonation. Uses features to enhance meaning

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“very talented”, “good at teaching”, “really cares”	“exceptionally talented”, “specializes in”, “demonstrates remarkable dedication”, “holds in high regard”
Grammar	Simple + some complex sentences	Variety of complex structures with embedded clauses
Ideas	Surface description of abilities	Deeper analysis with specific examples of innovation and impact

Bác sĩ phẫu thuật tim tài năng với kỹ thuật tiên tiến tại Việt Nam minh họa IELTS Speaking

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

“I’d like to talk about Trinh Cong Son, who is widely regarded as one of Vietnam’s most gifted and influential songwriters and composers, though sadly he passed away in 2001.

Trinh Cong Son was a prolific composer who created over 600 songs during his lifetime, many of which have become timeless classics in Vietnamese music. His work spanned multiple genres, from anti-war songs to romantic ballads, but what truly set him apart was his ability to capture the essence of human emotions in the most profound yet accessible way. I first discovered his music through my parents, who would often play his songs at home, and I was immediately struck by the poetic depth and emotional resonance of his lyrics.

What makes him exceptionally talented in my eyes is the way he revolutionized Vietnamese songwriting. During the Vietnam War, when most artists were producing propaganda, he had the courage to write songs that questioned the senselessness of conflict and celebrated peace and humanity. His songs like ‘Diem Xua’ and ‘Noi Vong Tay Lon’ weren’t just melodically beautiful; they served as a voice for an entire generation grappling with the complexities of war and loss. This required not just musical talent but tremendous moral courage and artistic integrity.

Beyond his compositional skills, what I find most remarkable is his versatility and emotional range. He could write a heart-wrenching ballad about lost love that would move you to tears, and then compose a whimsical children’s song that would make you smile. This breadth of expression demonstrates a profound understanding of the human condition that goes far beyond technical proficiency. His melodies were often deceptively simple, yet they had this haunting quality that would linger in your mind long after the song ended.

What truly elevates him to genius level, in my opinion, is the enduring relevance of his work. Despite being written decades ago, his songs still resonate deeply with young Vietnamese people today, including my generation. They’ve been covered by countless artists, adapted into various musical styles, and continue to be performed at major cultural events. This timeless quality is, I believe, the hallmark of true talent – creating something that transcends its original context and speaks to universal human experiences.

Moreover, Trinh Cong Son’s influence extends beyond music into Vietnamese literature and cultural identity. His lyrics are studied in schools, quoted in everyday conversation, and have shaped how Vietnamese people express emotions about love, loss, and peace. He essentially created a new vocabulary for emotional expression in Vietnamese culture, which is an achievement few artists in any field can claim.

The reason I consider him so talented is that he embodied the complete artist – someone who possessed not just technical skill and creativity, but also vision, courage, and an unwavering commitment to his artistic principles. In a profession where many chase commercial success, he remained true to his artistic vision, creating work that was both commercially successful and artistically significant. That balance, I think, is what distinguishes the truly talented from the merely skilled.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	9	Speaks fluently và coherently với no apparent effort. Uses sophisticated cohesive devices seamlessly. Ideas flow naturally với excellent progression
Lexical Resource	9	Wide vocabulary với precise và sophisticated usage. Natural collocations và idiomatic language. Rare vocab used appropriately (prolific, senselessness, haunting quality, timeless quality)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	9	Full range of structures với full flexibility và accuracy. Complex sentences handled with ease. Minor errors extremely rare
Pronunciation	9	Varied intonation patterns to enhance meaning. Stress và rhythm used effectively. Fully comprehensible throughout

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói demonstrates effortless delivery với no hesitation. Candidate có thể maintain discourse trong 2.5-3 phút một cách tự nhiên, không có những pauses không cần thiết hay repetition vì thiếu ý tưởng.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• “revolutionized Vietnamese songwriting” – powerful verb choice thay vì “changed”
• “haunting quality” – adjective sophisticated hơn “memorable” hay “beautiful”
• “the hallmark of true talent” – idiomatic expression high-level
• “transcends its original context” – academic vocabulary used naturally
• “unwavering commitment” – strong collocation thể hiện depth of meaning

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Relative clauses: “who is widely regarded as”, “which have become timeless classics”
• Participle clauses: “Despite being written decades ago”
• Cleft sentences: “What makes him exceptionally talented”, “What I find most remarkable”
• Passive constructions: “His lyrics are studied”, “quoted in everyday conversation”
• Conditional implied: “few artists in any field can claim”
• Inversion: Không sử dụng nhưng có thể thêm vào nếu tự nhiên

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Bài nói không chỉ describe surface-level achievements mà còn analyze deeper impact của Trinh Cong Son:

• Moral courage trong wartime context
• Versatility across different emotional registers
• Timeless relevance cho multiple generations
• Cultural impact beyond just music
• Balance between commercial và artistic success

Việc phát triển ý sâu sắc về tài năng cũng có điểm tương đồng với cách bạn miêu tả describe a building you admire for its architecture, khi đều cần phân tích ảnh hưởng và ý nghĩa sâu xa.

---

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2 để transition sang Part 3:

Question 1: Do you listen to his music often?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, quite often. I usually listen to his songs when I’m feeling sad or nostalgic. His music helps me relax.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Absolutely, his music has become somewhat of a comfort for me. I turn to his songs particularly during reflective moments, as there’s something about the melancholic beauty of his melodies that helps me process complex emotions. It’s become a regular part of my evening routine.”

---

Question 2: Is his music popular among young people in Vietnam?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, many young people still like his music. Some singers make new versions of his songs that are more modern. Young people can hear them on social media.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Interestingly, yes – his music has experienced a resurgence among younger generations, partly due to contemporary artists reinterpreting his classics with modern arrangements. Social media platforms have also played a significant role in introducing his work to millennials and Gen Z, who might not have discovered him otherwise. I think there’s something universally appealing about authentic emotional expression that transcends generational gaps.”

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi thảo luận sâu và trừu tượng hơn, thường explore các khía cạnh rộng hơn của chủ đề trong Part 2. Đây là phần khó nhất và quan trọng nhất trong việc phân biệt band 7+ với band 6.

Yêu cầu:

• Phân tích, so sánh, đánh giá các vấn đề xã hội
• Đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân có lý lẽ chặt chẽ
• Xem xét nhiều góc độ của vấn đề (pros/cons, past/present/future)
• Sử dụng examples từ xã hội, không chỉ kinh nghiệm cá nhân

Chiến lược:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời ít nhất 3-5 câu
• Sử dụng discourse markers để buy time và organize thoughts
• Đưa ra examples cụ thể từ thế giới thực
• Acknowledge complexity của vấn đề khi thích hợp
• Không sợ nói “That’s an interesting question” hay “I haven’t thought about this before, but…”

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn như Part 1 (1-2 câu)
• Không phát triển reasoning
• Thiếu vocabulary trừu tượng để discuss concepts
• Chỉ nói về personal experience thay vì societal trends
• Không structure câu trả lời rõ ràng

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Nature vs Nurture in Talent Development

---

Question 1: Do you think people are born with talent or can it be developed through practice?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion – Nature vs Nurture debate
• Key words: born with, developed, practice
• Cách tiếp cận: Đưa ra balanced view hoặc chọn một bên nhưng acknowledge góc nhìn kia. Include scientific/social evidence nếu có thể

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think both are important. Some people have natural ability from birth, like being good at sports or music. But they still need to practice a lot to become really talented. For example, Mozart was a musical genius, but he also practiced many hours every day. So I believe talent is important, but hard work is also necessary to develop it fully.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position → Example → Conclusion, nhưng simple
• Vocabulary: Basic words (natural ability, really talented, hard work)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response với reasoning but lacks sophistication trong vocabulary và depth of analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“That’s a fascinating question that has sparked considerable debate among psychologists and educators. I’d say the truth lies somewhere in between, though I lean towards the view that while genetic predisposition certainly plays a role, it’s far from being the sole determinant of success.

On the one hand, there’s compelling evidence that some individuals are born with certain neurological advantages – for instance, perfect pitch in music or exceptional spatial reasoning in mathematics. These innate abilities can give someone a significant head start in developing expertise in specific domains.

That being said, research by Anders Ericsson on deliberate practice has shown that even those without obvious natural gifts can achieve extraordinary levels of proficiency through sustained, focused training. The famous “10,000-hour rule” highlights the importance of dedicated practice in mastering any skill, regardless of initial aptitude.

What I find most interesting is that talent and practice seem to have a synergistic relationship. Natural ability might make the initial learning curve less steep, but without disciplined practice and refinement, that potential remains largely untapped. Conversely, someone with moderate natural ability but exceptional work ethic can often surpass those who rely solely on their innate gifts.

To sum up, I believe we’re all born with varying degrees of aptitude for different activities, but it’s the combination of that potential with deliberate, sustained effort that ultimately determines who becomes truly talented in their field.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized: Introduction with position → Evidence for nature → Evidence for nurture → Synthesis of both → Conclusion
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (sparked considerable debate, genetic predisposition, neurological advantages, synergistic relationship, largely untapped)
• Grammar: Complex structures seamlessly integrated – conditionals (might make), relative clauses (who rely solely on), passive forms (has been shown)
• Critical Thinking: Shows nuanced understanding của complex issue, cites research, acknowledges multiple perspectives

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: That’s a fascinating question, On the one hand, That being said, What I find most interesting, To sum up
• Tentative language: I’d say, I lean towards, seems to have, can often
• Abstract nouns: predisposition, proficiency, aptitude, potential, synthesis

---

Question 2: How can society better identify and nurture talented individuals, especially children?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Problem-Solution, Social Policy
• Key words: society, identify, nurture, children
• Cách tiếp cận: Discuss current methods → Identify problems → Suggest improvements → Consider challenges

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think schools should have better programs to find talented students. Teachers can watch students and see who is good at different things like art, sports, or science. Then schools can give these students special classes or training. The government should also give money to support talented children from poor families so they have the same opportunities as rich children.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Suggestion → Implementation → Equity consideration
• Vocabulary: Basic educational terms but appropriate
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points but lacks depth về implementation challenges và broader societal impact

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is a critical issue that many countries are grappling with, and I think it requires a multi-faceted approach involving education systems, families, and broader social structures.

First and foremost, we need more comprehensive assessment methods that go beyond traditional academic testing. The current system tends to favor linguistic and logical-mathematical intelligence, while overlooking other forms of talent like kinesthetic ability, emotional intelligence, or creative thinking. Implementing Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences in schools would help cast a wider net for identifying diverse talents.

Equally important is ensuring equitable access to opportunities for talent development. In many societies, talented children from underprivileged backgrounds simply lack exposure to resources that could help them flourish. This is where I believe government intervention becomes crucial – through subsidized programs, scholarship schemes, and community-based talent initiatives that level the playing field.

However, we also need to be careful not to put excessive pressure on young people identified as talented. There’s a phenomenon psychologists call “gifted kid burnout” where children pushed too hard too early end up losing their passion. So any talent nurturing program needs to strike a balance between providing opportunities and preserving the intrinsic motivation that drives genuine excellence.

Another dimension worth considering is mentorship programs that connect talented young people with accomplished professionals in their field. This kind of guidance and real-world exposure can be invaluable in helping them navigate their career paths and understand what it truly takes to excel.

In an ideal scenario, we’d have an integrated system where schools, families, and specialized institutions work together to create personalized development pathways for talented individuals while ensuring they also receive a well-rounded education. It’s not just about producing prodigies; it’s about cultivating well-adjusted individuals who can contribute meaningfully to society.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Problem identification → Multiple solutions → Cautions/balance → Additional suggestions → Ideal vision
• Vocabulary: Policy-related vocabulary (government intervention, subsidized programs, equitable access), psychological terms (intrinsic motivation, gifted kid burnout)
• Grammar: Full range – passive constructions, conditional structures, complex noun phrases
• Critical Thinking: Considers multiple stakeholders, acknowledges potential problems with solutions, references theories, shows holistic thinking

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: First and foremost, Equally important, However, Another dimension, In an ideal scenario
• Hedging language: I think it requires, would help, tends to favor
• Academic vocabulary: multi-faceted approach, comprehensive assessment, implementing theory, navigate career paths

Chương trình phát triển tài năng trẻ em đa dạng tại Việt Nam cho IELTS Speaking

---

Theme 2: Talent in the Modern Workplace

Question 3: Is talent more important than qualifications when hiring employees?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare and Evaluate
• Key words: talent, qualifications, hiring
• Cách tiếp cận: Define both concepts → Compare their value → Consider context-dependent factors → Give balanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think both are important, but it depends on the job. For some jobs like doctor or engineer, qualifications are very important because you need specific knowledge and certificates. But for creative jobs like design or marketing, talent and creativity might be more important than having a degree. Companies should look at both qualifications and talent when they hire people.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Position → Examples for each side → Conclusion
• Vocabulary: Job-related vocabulary but basic
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Logical response but lacks sophisticated analysis of how these factors interact

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is a nuanced question because the relative importance of talent versus qualifications really hinges on the nature of the role and the industry in question.

In highly regulated professions – medicine, law, engineering, for instance – qualifications are absolutely non-negotiable. They serve as objective validation that someone has acquired the foundational knowledge and met standardized competency requirements. You wouldn’t want an unqualified surgeon operating on you, no matter how naturally talented they might be at manual dexterity or staying calm under pressure.

That said, qualifications alone are insufficient predictors of actual job performance. There’s a growing recognition in the corporate world that soft skills, adaptability, and raw talent often outweigh formal credentials, particularly in rapidly evolving fields like technology and creative industries. Someone with an innate flair for problem-solving or exceptional interpersonal skills might bring more value to an organization than someone with an impressive degree but limited practical ability.

What’s increasingly common in forward-thinking companies is a hybrid approach to recruitment. They use qualifications as a baseline filter to ensure candidates have the requisite technical knowledge, but then place greater emphasis on demonstrating actual talent through practical assessments, portfolio reviews, or trial projects. This way, they’re not overly constrained by educational credentials while still ensuring professional standards are met.

I’d also argue that the definition of qualifications is evolving. Online courses, industry certifications, and demonstrable project experience are gaining currency as alternatives to traditional degrees, especially in sectors where practical skills trump theoretical knowledge.

Ultimately, I believe the question shouldn’t be talent versus qualifications, but rather how to effectively evaluate both in tandem. The most successful hires are typically those who combine solid foundational knowledge with the talent and drive to apply that knowledge innovatively. Striking that balance is what separates exceptional hiring decisions from merely adequate ones.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Acknowledge complexity → Discuss qualifications-critical roles → Discuss talent-critical roles → Modern hybrid approach → Evolving definitions → Synthesized conclusion
• Vocabulary: Business/HR specific (non-negotiable, predictors of performance, baseline filter, gaining currency, practical ability)
• Grammar: Sophisticated structures – inversion (no matter how), parallel structures (combine… with…), conditionals
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis considering industry differences, modern trends, evolving definitions

💡 Key Language Features:

• Academic discourse: hinges on, insufficient predictors of, increasingly common, gaining currency
• Balancing expressions: That said, While… still, not… versus but rather
• Business vocabulary: regulated professions, forward-thinking companies, recruitment, hiring decisions

Khi thảo luận về tài năng trong công việc, việc phân tích sâu này cũng có thể được áp dụng khi bạn trả lời các câu hỏi về how can sports bring people together ielts, nơi bạn cần phân tích các yếu tố xã hội phức tạp.

---

Question 4: How has the definition of “talent” changed in the digital age?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Change Over Time, Social Trends
• Key words: definition, talent, digital age, changed
• Cách tiếp cận: Describe traditional definition → Explain how technology changed this → Give examples → Discuss implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“In the past, talent usually meant being very good at traditional skills like music, art, or sports. Now with the internet and social media, there are many new kinds of talents. For example, people can be famous for making videos on YouTube or TikTok. These digital skills are now considered talents too. Also, anyone can show their talent online, not just people in big companies or famous schools.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Past → Present → Example → Democratization point
• Vocabulary: Technology terms but basic (internet, social media, online)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main transition but lacks analytical depth about implications

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“The digital revolution has fundamentally reshaped our conception of talent in several profound ways.

Traditionally, talent was largely confined to conventional domains – mastery of musical instruments, prowess in sports, or excellence in traditional arts and crafts. These skills required years of formal training, often accessible only to those with financial means or institutional support. Talent was also gate-kept by established authorities like record labels, publishers, or academic institutions who determined who got recognition.

The digital age has democratized both the development and showcase of talent. First and foremost, the internet has lowered barriers to entry dramatically. You no longer need expensive studio equipment or industry connections to reach a global audience. A teenager with a smartphone and creativity can become an influential content creator, amassing millions of followers based purely on their unique voice and authentic engagement with their audience.

More significantly, we’ve seen the emergence of entirely new categories of talent that didn’t exist a generation ago. Digital literacy, data visualization, UX/UI design, algorithmic thinking – these are now highly prized skills that command premium value in the marketplace. Even seemingly trivial abilities like being charismatic on camera or having an eye for Instagram aesthetics have become monetizable talents in the creator economy.

Another crucial shift is that talent is now less about perfection and more about authenticity and relatability. Social media has shown us that imperfect but genuine often resonates more deeply than polished but sterile content. This has recalibrated our expectations of what talented people should look and sound like.

However, this democratization comes with its own set of challenges. The sheer volume of content means talent can get lost in the noise, and algorithmic bias sometimes amplifies mediocrity while genuine skill goes unnoticed. There’s also a question of whether some viral sensations truly represent talent or just fortunate timing and clever marketing.

What’s fascinating is how this has blurred the lines between professional and amateur. The concept of “amateur talent” now seems almost obsolete – many self-taught YouTubers produce work that rivals or surpasses traditional professionals. This has forced traditional institutions to rethink their value proposition and adapt to this new landscape.

In essence, the digital age has made talent more diverse, more accessible, and more fluid, but also more complex to define and evaluate. It’s an exciting time, but one that requires us to continuously reassess what we mean when we call someone talented.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Historical context → Democratization → New categories → Quality shift → Challenges → Professional/amateur blur → Synthesized conclusion
• Vocabulary: Technology + social commentary vocabulary (gate-kept, democratized, monetizable, algorithmic bias, viral sensations)
• Grammar: Full range including passive forms, participle clauses, cleft sentences
• Critical Thinking: Multi-layered analysis covering access, new categories, quality metrics, challenges, and broader social implications

💡 Key Language Features:

• Change vocabulary: fundamentally reshaped, has democratized, recalibrated, blurred the lines
• Contrasting language: less about… more about, traditional vs digital, perfect vs authentic
• Evaluative language: fascinating, crucial shift, comes with challenges, exciting time

---

Theme 3: Cultural Perspectives on Talent

Question 5: Do different cultures value different types of talents?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare and Contrast, Cultural Analysis
• Key words: cultures, value, different types, talents
• Cách tiếp cận: Give position → Provide cultural examples → Explain underlying reasons → Discuss globalisation impact

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think so. In Asian countries like Vietnam, parents often value academic talents more than creative talents. They want their children to be good at math and science. But in Western countries, I think they value creativity and individuality more. They encourage children to develop artistic talents like music or painting. This is because of different education systems and cultural values about success.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Agreement → Asian example → Western example → Reason
• Vocabulary: Geographic and cultural terms but general
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Makes valid cultural comparisons but stereotypical và lacks nuanced understanding

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Absolutely, and I think this reflects deeper cultural values and socioeconomic contexts that shape how societies perceive and reward different abilities.

Take East Asian cultures, for instance, where there’s traditionally been a strong emphasis on academic achievement, particularly in STEM fields. This isn’t arbitrary – it’s rooted in Confucian values that prioritize education as a pathway to social mobility and collective prosperity. Countries like South Korea, Japan, and China have historically channeled their youth toward technically demanding professions because these were seen as essential for national development. Mathematical and scientific talent is held in particularly high esteem because it’s measurable, objective, and translates into economic productivity.

In stark contrast, many Western societies, particularly Scandinavian countries, place considerable value on creative and artistic talents. This stems from cultural ideologies that celebrate individualism and self-expression. There’s a greater tolerance for unconventional career paths and a more robust social safety net that allows people to pursue artistic endeavors without the fear of financial ruin. The concept of “finding yourself” through creative exploration is more culturally acceptable there than in societies where pragmatism and financial security are paramount concerns.

Interestingly, some cultures place extraordinary value on talents that might seem peripheral elsewhere. In Kenya and Ethiopia, long-distance running talent is deeply revered and systematically cultivated, partly because of geographic and genetic advantages, but also because successful athletes become national heroes who bring international recognition. Similarly, in Brazil, football prowess is almost sacred, transcending mere sport to become a symbol of national identity.

It’s also worth noting that within any culture, there are generational shifts in what talents are valued. The rise of the digital economy has made tech-savvy talents universally desirable, somewhat eroding traditional cultural boundaries. A talented software engineer or digital marketer is valued in Tokyo just as much as in Silicon Valley these days.

That said, I’d caution against overgeneralizing. Even within a single country, there can be vast differences based on socioeconomic class, urban versus rural settings, and individual family values. An affluent family in Ho Chi Minh City might encourage artistic pursuits that a rural farming family simply can’t afford to prioritize.

What’s particularly interesting in our globalized world is how these cultural differences are both persisting and hybridizing. Young people are exposed to diverse value systems through media and education, leading to more eclectic definitions of what constitutes valuable talent. We’re seeing Asian parents becoming more open to creative careers, while Western societies are placing renewed emphasis on STEM education to remain competitive.

In conclusion, while cultural contexts definitely shape which talents are celebrated and cultivated, these are fluid categories that evolve with economic realities, global influences, and generational perspectives.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Confirmation → East Asian example with cultural roots → Western contrast with ideology → Unique cultural examples → Digital convergence → Caution against stereotypes → Globalization impact → Nuanced conclusion
• Vocabulary: Anthropological/sociological vocabulary (socioeconomic contexts, cultural ideologies, generational shifts, hybridizing)
• Grammar: Sophisticated structures including embedded clauses, passive voice for formality, participle phrases
• Critical Thinking: Avoids stereotypes, provides cultural-historical context, acknowledges within-culture variation, discusses evolution and convergence

💡 Key Language Features:

• Cultural analysis terms: reflects deeper values, rooted in, stems from, transcending
• Hedging and nuancing: I’d caution against, That said, can be, tend to
• Contrast markers: In stark contrast, Interestingly, while… still

Nếu bạn quan tâm đến việc phát triển kỹ năng tranh luận về các khía cạnh văn hóa và xã hội, việc rèn luyện qua chủ đề này cũng giúp bạn chuẩn bị tốt hơn cho describe a competition you want to participate in khi cần giải thích động lực và giá trị văn hóa.

---

Question 6: Should talented people have a responsibility to use their talents for the benefit of society?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion on Ethics/Responsibility
• Key words: responsibility, benefit of society, should
• Cách tiếp cận: Consider different perspectives → Examine pros/cons of obligation → Discuss practical implications → Give nuanced position

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think talented people should try to help society if they can. For example, talented doctors can treat poor people for free sometimes, or famous artists can donate money to charity. But I also understand that everyone has the right to use their talent however they want. It’s their personal choice. Maybe the best way is to encourage talented people to help society, but not force them.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Opinion → Examples → Alternative view → Compromise
• Vocabulary: Basic ethical terms
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Balanced view but lacks philosophical depth về rights, obligations, and social contract

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is a deeply philosophical question that touches on issues of individual liberty, social responsibility, and the nature of talent itself. My view is somewhat nuanced.

On principle, I’m hesitant to impose any moral obligation on talented individuals simply because they happen to possess exceptional abilities. Talent, whether innate or cultivated, doesn’t automatically come with strings attached. To suggest that talented people “owe” society something risks commodifying their abilities and reducing them to mere instruments of social utility. From a libertarian perspective, people should have autonomy over how they deploy their talents, whether that’s for personal fulfillment, financial gain, or social good.

However, I also recognize that talent rarely develops in a vacuum. Most talented individuals have benefited from societal infrastructure – education systems, cultural institutions, public funding of the arts and sciences, mentorship, and social stability that allowed them to hone their craft. From this angle, there’s a compelling argument that success creates a reciprocal obligation to “give back” to the community that facilitated that success. This is the “social contract” perspective.

What I find most persuasive is a middle ground that emphasizes encouragement rather than compulsion. Society should create incentives and cultural narratives that make socially beneficial uses of talent rewarding and celebrated, without mandating it. For instance, tax benefits for charitable work, recognition programs for public service, or platforms that amplify voices using their talents for positive impact.

There’s also a question of what “benefit to society” actually means. Is a novelist who writes purely for artistic expression not benefiting society by enriching our cultural landscape? Does a talented athlete who inspires millions through their achievements fulfill a social function even if they’re primarily driven by personal ambition? I’d argue that the relationship between individual talent and social benefit is more complex and indirect than simple obligation would suggest.

That said, I do think those in positions of extraordinary privilege and influence – say, billionaire entrepreneurs or globally renowned artists – have a heightened responsibility because their capacity for impact is disproportionately large. With great power comes great responsibility, as the saying goes. Someone with the platform to shape public discourse or the resources to address systemic problems arguably has a stronger moral case for using those abilities pro-socially.

In practical terms, I believe the focus should be on cultivating a culture where using talent for communal benefit is seen as admirable rather than obligatory, where ethical considerations are woven into professional training, and where systemic barriers that prevent talented people from marginalized backgrounds from even developing their abilities are dismantled.

Ultimately, while I stop short of saying talented people have a binding duty, I believe a society flourishes when its talented members choose to leverage their abilities not just for personal success but for collective advancement. The key word there is “choose” – intrinsic motivation and genuine care produce far more meaningful contributions than coerced obligation ever could.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Acknowledge complexity → Individual liberty argument → Social contract counter-argument → Middle ground position → Definition examination → Scale of responsibility → Practical approach → Nuanced conclusion
• Vocabulary: Philosophical/ethical vocabulary (moral obligation, autonomy, reciprocal obligation, social contract, intrinsic motivation)
• Grammar: Full sophisticated range – inversion (rarely develops), cleft sentences (What I find most persuasive), conditionals (if/whether structures)
• Critical Thinking: Examines multiple philosophical frameworks, questions assumptions, considers practical implications, acknowledges complexity, avoids absolutism

💡 Key Language Features:

• Philosophical discourse: touches on, on principle, from this angle, middle ground, ultimately
• Hedging sophisticated: I’m hesitant to, somewhat nuanced, arguably has, stop short of
• Abstract concepts: autonomy, commodifying, reciprocal obligation, systemic barriers, collective advancement

Trách nhiệm xã hội của người tài năng đóng góp cho cộng đồng trong IELTS Speaking

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
exceptionally talented	adj phrase	/ɪkˈsepʃənəli ˈtæləntɪd/	cực kỳ tài năng	She is exceptionally talented at playing the piano.	exceptionally gifted, exceptionally skilled, exceptionally creative
have a knack for	idiom	/hæv ə næk fɔː/	có khiếu về	He has a knack for solving complex problems quickly.	natural knack, special knack, real knack for
excel in/at	verb	/ɪkˈsel/	xuất sắc trong	She excels at mathematics and science.	excel academically, excel professionally, excel in one’s field
innate talent	noun phrase	/ɪˈneɪt ˈtælənt/	tài năng bẩm sinh	His innate talent for music was evident from childhood.	innate ability, innate gift, innate skill
technical prowess	noun phrase	/ˈteknɪkəl ˈpraʊəs/	kỹ năng kỹ thuật cao	The surgeon’s technical prowess saved many lives.	technical mastery, technical expertise, technical proficiency
demonstrate remarkable	verb phrase	/ˈdemənstreɪt rɪˈmɑːkəbl/	thể hiện khả năng đáng chú ý	He demonstrates remarkable dedication to his craft.	demonstrate exceptional, demonstrate outstanding, demonstrate extraordinary
prodigy	noun	/ˈprɒdɪdʒi/	thần đồng	Mozart was a musical prodigy who composed at age five.	child prodigy, piano prodigy, mathematical prodigy
versatility	noun	/ˌvɜːsəˈtɪləti/	tính linh hoạt, đa năng	Her versatility allows her to work across different genres.	remarkable versatility, great versatility, artistic versatility
groundbreaking work	noun phrase	/ˈɡraʊndbreɪkɪŋ wɜːk/	công trình đột phá	His groundbreaking work in AI revolutionized the field.	groundbreaking research, groundbreaking discovery, groundbreaking achievement
go the extra mile	idiom	/ɡəʊ ði ˈekstrə maɪl/	nỗ lực hết mình, làm nhiều hơn mong đợi	She always goes the extra mile for her students.	willing to go, always go, prepared to go
stand out in one’s field	phrase	/stænd aʊt ɪn wʌnz fiːld/	nổi bật trong lĩnh vực	Her innovative approach makes her stand out in her field.	really stand out, clearly stand out, manage to stand out
mastery of	noun phrase	/ˈmɑːstəri əv/	sự thành thạo về	His mastery of the violin is unparalleled.	complete mastery, technical mastery, achieve mastery
cultivate talent	verb phrase	/ˈkʌltɪveɪt ˈtælənt/	nuôi dưỡng tài năng	The school aims to cultivate talent in young artists.	cultivate skills, cultivate abilities, help cultivate
hone one’s skills	verb phrase	/həʊn wʌnz skɪlz/	mài giũa kỹ năng	He spent years honing his skills as a chef.	hone abilities, hone craft, hone expertise
natural aptitude	noun phrase	/ˈnætʃrəl ˈæptɪtjuːd/	khả năng tự nhiên	She has a natural aptitude for languages.	natural ability, natural flair, natural gift
cutting-edge techniques	noun phrase	/ˈkʌtɪŋ edʒ tekˈniːks/	kỹ thuật tiên tiến	The surgeon uses cutting-edge techniques in operations.	cutting-edge technology, cutting-edge methods, cutting-edge approach
proficiency	noun	/prəˈfɪʃənsi/	sự thành thạo	Her proficiency in multiple languages is impressive.	high proficiency, demonstrate proficiency, level of proficiency
trailblazer	noun	/ˈtreɪlbleɪzə/	người tiên phong	She’s a trailblazer in renewable energy research.	true trailblazer, industry trailblazer, creative trailblazer
virtuoso	noun	/ˌvɜːtʃuˈəʊsəʊ/	nghệ sĩ bậc thầy	He’s considered a virtuoso of classical guitar.	piano virtuoso, violin virtuoso, true virtuoso
flourish in	verb	/ˈflʌrɪʃ ɪn/	phát triển mạnh trong	Talented individuals flourish in supportive environments.	flourish professionally, flourish creatively, begin to flourish

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
head and shoulders above	vượt trội hơn hẳn	She is head and shoulders above other candidates in her field.	7.5-9
in a league of one’s own	đẳng cấp riêng, không ai sánh kịp	As a composer, he’s in a league of his own.	7.5-9
the cream of the crop	những người giỏi nhất	Only the cream of the crop make it to the national team.	7-8
second to none	không ai sánh bằng	Her expertise in neurosurgery is second to none.	7.5-9
a cut above the rest	vượt trội hơn số còn lại	His innovative approach is a cut above the rest.	7-8
set the bar high	đặt tiêu chuẩn cao	His groundbreaking research set the bar high for others.	7-8
raise the bar	nâng cao tiêu chuẩn	She continues to raise the bar in competitive gymnastics.	7-8
push the boundaries	phá vỡ giới hạn	Great artists push the boundaries of their medium.	7.5-8.5
blaze a trail	mở đường, tiên phong	She blazed a trail for women in engineering.	7.5-9
leave one’s mark	để dấu ấn	His contributions left a lasting mark on the industry.	7-8
have what it takes	có đủ phẩm chất cần thiết	She definitely has what it takes to succeed at the highest level.	7-8
separate the wheat from the chaff	phân biệt người giỏi với người tầm thường	Competitions help separate the wheat from the chaff.	8-9

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Dùng khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ ngắn: “Well, that’s an interesting question…”
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc thông tin bất ngờ: “Actually, I think it’s more complex than that…”
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi thể hiện sự thật thẳng: “To be honest, I’ve never thought about it that way before…”
• 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm có phần dè dặt: “I’d say that talent alone isn’t enough…”
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Nhấn mạnh quan điểm cá nhân: “From my perspective, both factors play important roles…”

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm điểm quan trọng nữa: “On top of that, she’s incredibly dedicated…”
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa: “What’s more, his work has influenced an entire generation…”
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến: “Not to mention her contributions to charity work…”
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra còn: “Beyond that, he’s an excellent mentor to young professionals…”
• 📝 Another thing worth mentioning is… – Một điều đáng nói khác là: “Another thing worth mentioning is his humble attitude…”

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét
• 📝 Having said that,… – Tuy nhiên: “Having said that, natural talent still provides an advantage…”
• 📝 That being said,… – Điều đó được nói ra: “That being said, hard work can compensate for limited natural ability…”

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại: “All in all, I believe both talent and effort are essential…”
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì: “At the end of the day, what matters most is the impact they create…”
• 📝 To sum up,… – Tóm lược: “To sum up, talented individuals shape our society in countless ways…”
• 📝 In essence,… – Về bản chất: “In essence, talent is potential, but dedication turns it into achievement…”

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

• Mixed conditional: If + past perfect, would/could + infinitive (hoặc ngược lại)

  • Ví dụ: “If he hadn’t received proper training in his youth, he wouldn’t be such an accomplished pianist today.”
  • “If she were more confident, she would have pursued her musical career earlier.”

• Inversion in conditionals: Had/Were/Should + subject + verb

  • Ví dụ: “Had she not discovered her talent early, she might have chosen a completely different path.”
  • “Were he to dedicate more time to practice, he could reach championship level.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

• Non-defining relative clauses: Thêm thông tin không thiết yếu

  • Ví dụ: “Dr. Nguyen, who has pioneered several surgical techniques, is highly respected in the medical community.”
  • “His latest composition, which took three years to complete, has received international acclaim.”

• Reduced relative clauses: Rút gọn với participles

  • Ví dụ: “People possessing exceptional talent often face unique pressures.” (= who possess)
  • “The techniques developed by her have revolutionized the industry.” (= which were developed)

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

• Impersonal passive structures:

  • It is thought/believed/said that…: “It is widely believed that talent requires both nature and nurture.”
  • Subject + be + said/thought/considered + to + infinitive: “She is considered to be one of the most talented architects of her generation.”

• Get passive: Informal hơn, nhấn mạnh quá trình

  • Ví dụ: “He got recognized for his outstanding contributions to science.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

• What clauses: Nhấn mạnh object hoặc action

  • Ví dụ: “What I find most impressive about her is her ability to innovate constantly.”
  • “What truly distinguishes talented people is their dedication to continuous improvement.”

• It clauses: Nhấn mạnh subject hoặc một phần của câu

  • Ví dụ: “It was her perseverance that led to her eventual success, not just natural ability.”
  • “It’s not just about having talent; it’s about knowing how to develop it.”

5. Inversion for Emphasis:

• Negative adverbials at the beginning:
  • Ví dụ: “Never have I seen such dedication to one’s craft.”
  • “Rarely do we encounter someone with such a perfect combination of talent and humility.”
  • “Only by combining natural ability with relentless practice can one achieve true mastery.”

6. Participle Clauses:

• Present participle: Diễn tả hành động đồng thời hoặc nguyên nhân

  • Ví dụ: “Having studied under renowned masters, she developed an exceptional technique.”
  • “Recognizing her potential early, her parents enrolled her in specialized programs.”

• Past participle: Diễn tả kết quả hoặc trạng thái bị động

  • Ví dụ: “Trained by the best coaches, he went on to win multiple championships.”

7. Subjunctive Mood:

• Formal suggestions or requirements:
  • Ví dụ: “It’s essential that talented individuals be given opportunities to develop their skills.”
  • “The committee recommends that she receive additional support for her research.”

Việc nắm vững các cấu trúc ngữ pháp này sẽ giúp bạn tự tin hơn không chỉ trong chủ đề này mà còn trong mọi tình huống của bài thi IELTS Speaking. Hãy thực hành thường xuyên và áp dụng chúng một cách tự nhiên trong giao tiếp để đạt band điểm cao nhất!