IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe A Public Figure You Admire For Their Work” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề “Describe A Public Figure You Admire For Their Work” là một trong những đề bài phổ biến nhất trong IELTS Speaking Part 2, xuất hiện thường xuyên từ năm 2020 đến nay với tần suất khoảng 15-20% trong các kỳ thi thực tế. Chủ đề này không chỉ kiểm tra khả năng mô tả con người mà còn đánh giá khả năng phân tích, đánh giá công việc và thành tựu của một cá nhân có ảnh hưởng.

Qua bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được cách trả lời tự nhiên và ấn tượng cho cả ba phần thi, từ câu hỏi ngắn trong Part 1 về famous people, đến bài nói dài 2 phút trong Part 2, và thảo luận sâu về vai trò của public figures trong xã hội ở Part 3. Bạn cũng sẽ có trong tay bộ từ vựng chuyên biệt, các cấu trúc ngữ pháp nâng cao và chiến lược trả lời từ góc nhìn của một examiner với hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm chấm thi IELTS.

Đặc biệt, bài viết cung cấp các bài mẫu chi tiết theo từng band điểm (6-7, 7.5-8, 8.5-9) với phân tích cụ thể giúp bạn hiểu rõ sự khác biệt giữa các mức điểm và biết cách nâng cao khả năng Speaking của mình một cách hiệu quả.

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về đời sống hàng ngày và sở thích cá nhân. Với chủ đề về famous people và public figures, examiner sẽ hỏi những câu hỏi đơn giản về việc bạn có theo dõi người nổi tiếng hay không, loại người nổi tiếng nào bạn thích, và vai trò của họ trong xã hội.

Chiến lược hiệu quả nhất là trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, sau đó mở rộng với lý do và ví dụ cụ thể trong 2-3 câu. Nhiều học viên Việt Nam thường mắc lỗi trả lời quá ngắn gọn kiểu “Yes, I do” hoặc “No, I don’t” mà không giải thích thêm. Một lỗi phổ biến khác là dùng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “nice”, “interesting” thay vì các từ chính xác và phong phú hơn.

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you often follow news about famous people?

Question 2: What kind of public figures do you admire?

Question 3: Have you ever met any famous people in person?

Question 4: Do you think celebrities have a positive influence on young people?

Question 5: Would you like to be famous in the future?

Question 6: How do people in your country feel about public figures?

Question 7: Do you think being famous brings more advantages or disadvantages?

Question 8: What makes someone become a famous public figure nowadays?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you often follow news about famous people?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời Yes/No rõ ràng
• Giải thích loại người nổi tiếng bạn quan tâm
• Đưa ra lý do hoặc cách bạn theo dõi họ

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I do follow some famous people, especially those who work in entertainment. I usually check their social media to see what they’re doing. I think it’s interesting to know about their daily lives.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp, có đề cập đến cách thức (social media) và lý do cơ bản
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng đơn giản (interesting, doing), thiếu ví dụ cụ thể, cấu trúc câu chưa đa dạng
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đủ thông tin nhưng chưa demonstrate được vocabulary range và grammatical complexity

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, I’d say I selectively follow certain public figures, particularly those who are making meaningful contributions in fields like education or social activism. I tend to keep tabs on them through documentaries and reputable news sources rather than celebrity gossip platforms. What draws me to these individuals is their genuine commitment to creating positive change rather than just seeking publicity.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Từ vựng chính xác và tinh tế (selectively follow, meaningful contributions, keep tabs on, reputable news sources, genuine commitment), cấu trúc phức tạp với relative clauses, thể hiện critical thinking khi phân biệt loại nội dung theo dõi
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency tự nhiên với discourse marker “Well, I’d say”, lexical resource phong phú với collocations mạnh, grammar đa dạng, ý tưởng sâu sắc hơn so với câu trả lời thông thường

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• selectively follow: theo dõi có chọn lọc
• making meaningful contributions: đóng góp ý nghĩa
• keep tabs on: theo dõi thường xuyên (informal)
• reputable news sources: nguồn tin đáng tin cậy
• draws me to: thu hút tôi đến
• genuine commitment: cam kết thực sự

---

Question: What kind of public figures do you admire?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu rõ loại người nổi tiếng (scientists, activists, artists, entrepreneurs…)
• Giải thích qualities bạn ngưỡng mộ
• Có thể đưa ví dụ ngắn gọn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I admire scientists and researchers because they work hard to find solutions to problems. They are smart and dedicated to their work. I think their work is very important for society.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời rõ ràng với lý do cơ bản (hard-working, important for society)
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng chung chung (smart, work hard), thiếu depth trong explanation, không có ví dụ cụ thể
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response nhưng lacks sophistication trong vocabulary và ideas

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I have tremendous respect for public figures who are pioneers in their respective fields, particularly scientists and social entrepreneurs. What I find most admirable is their unwavering dedication to solving real-world problems despite facing numerous setbacks. Take someone like environmental activists – they’re constantly pushing boundaries and challenging the status quo to address pressing issues like climate change, which requires both intellectual rigor and moral courage.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary sophisticated (tremendous respect, pioneers in their respective fields, unwavering dedication, numerous setbacks, pushing boundaries, challenging the status quo, intellectual rigor, moral courage), grammar đa dạng với relative clauses và participial phrases, ý tưởng nuanced với ví dụ cụ thể về environmental activists
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates excellent lexical resource với precise word choices, complex sentence structures, và critical thinking skills khi phân tích qualities cần thiết (both intellectual and moral aspects)

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• tremendous respect for: rất kính trọng
• pioneers in their respective fields: người tiên phong trong lĩnh vực của họ
• unwavering dedication: sự cống hiến không lay chuyển
• numerous setbacks: nhiều thất bại
• pushing boundaries: vượt qua giới hạn
• challenging the status quo: thách thức hiện trạng
• intellectual rigor: tính chặt chẽ về mặt trí tuệ
• moral courage: lòng can đảm về mặt đạo đức

---

Question: Have you ever met any famous people in person?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời Yes/No trung thực
• Nếu Yes: mô tả ngắn gọn trải nghiệm và cảm xúc
• Nếu No: giải thích lý do hoặc nói về mong muốn trong tương lai

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“No, I haven’t met any famous people yet. But I would really like to meet some scientists or writers in the future. I think it would be a great experience to talk to them and learn from them.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Honest answer, có đề cập future possibility
• Hạn chế: Quá ngắn, từ vựng basic (great experience, talk to, learn from)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Meets basic requirements nhưng thiếu elaboration và sophisticated language

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Actually, I haven’t had the opportunity to cross paths with any well-known public figures, though it’s certainly something I’d jump at the chance to do. If I could sit down with someone influential, I’d love to meet a renowned social entrepreneur – someone who’s successfully bridged the gap between business innovation and social impact. I imagine it would be incredibly enlightening to hear firsthand about the challenges they’ve navigated and the decision-making processes behind their initiatives.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Natural discourse marker “Actually”, sophisticated expressions (cross paths with, jump at the chance, sit down with, renowned, successfully bridged, incredibly enlightening, firsthand, challenges they’ve navigated), conditional structure showing hypothetical thinking, detailed explanation về why và what kind of person
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Excellent fluency with natural hesitation device, wide range of vocabulary including idiomatic expressions, complex conditional structure, demonstrates depth of thought về value of such meeting

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• cross paths with: gặp gỡ tình cờ
• jump at the chance: nắm bắt cơ hội ngay lập tức
• sit down with: ngồi trò chuyện với (informal)
• renowned: nổi tiếng, có danh tiếng
• successfully bridged: kết nối thành công
• incredibly enlightening: vô cùng khai sáng
• firsthand: trực tiếp
• challenges they’ve navigated: những thách thức họ đã vượt qua

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị và ghi chú. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để demonstrate khả năng nói liên tục không bị gián đoạn. Với chủ đề về public figures, bạn cần chọn một người cụ thể và mô tả chi tiết công việc, thành tựu của họ.

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

• Sử dụng trọn vẹn 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Tổ chức ý theo bullet points của đề bài
• Nói ít nhất 1.5-2 phút để đảm bảo không bị mất điểm fluency
• Focus vào phần “explain” vì đây là nơi thể hiện critical thinking

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Không sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị, vội vàng bắt đầu
• Nói dưới 1.5 phút vì thiếu ý tưởng hoặc từ vựng
• Bỏ qua một số bullet points
• Mô tả quá chung chung, thiếu chi tiết cụ thể về achievements

Người nổi tiếng mà bạn ngưỡng mộ trong bài thi IELTS Speaking Part 2 về công việc của họ

Cue Card

Describe a public figure you admire for their work

You should say:

• Who this person is
• What work they do
• How you know about this person
• And explain why you admire their work

Phân Tích Đề Bài

• Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a person (focus on their professional work/achievements)
• Thì động từ: Chủ yếu hiện tại (vì người này vẫn đang làm việc) hoặc quá khứ nếu họ đã nghỉ hưu/qua đời
• Bullet points phải cover:
  • Who: Giới thiệu rõ ràng tên, nghề nghiệp
  • What work: Mô tả cụ thể công việc họ làm, không chỉ job title
  • How you know: Nguồn thông tin (news, social media, books…)
  • Why admire: Phần quan trọng nhất – giải thích impact, qualities, values
• Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là nơi bạn thể hiện critical thinking bằng cách phân tích tại sao công việc của họ đáng ngưỡng mộ, impact của họ đối với society, qualities nào làm họ outstanding. Không chỉ nói “because they’re successful” mà phải dig deeper vào values, challenges overcome, contributions to society.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about Elon Musk, who is a famous businessman and entrepreneur. He is the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, two very successful companies.

Elon Musk works in technology and innovation. His main work is developing electric cars with Tesla to reduce pollution and help the environment. He also works on space projects with SpaceX. His company builds rockets and wants to send people to Mars in the future. He is always working on new ideas and products.

I first heard about him on the news a few years ago when Tesla became very popular. After that, I started following his work on social media and reading articles about him. Many people talk about him online because he does interesting things.

I admire his work for several reasons. First, he is very ambitious and has big dreams. He wants to change how we travel and help solve climate change. Second, he works very hard and faces many challenges but never gives up. His companies had problems in the past, but he kept trying and made them successful. Finally, I think his work is important for the future. Electric cars and space exploration can make our lives better. He shows that with hard work and creativity, we can solve big problems in the world.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Nói được liên tục khoảng 1.5-2 phút, có linking words cơ bản (First, Second, Finally), ý tưởng organized nhưng chưa sophisticated
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng adequate (entrepreneur, innovation, ambitious, challenges, kept trying) nhưng chưa precise và varied, một số paraphrasing cơ bản
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Mix của simple và complex sentences, có relative clauses, một số lỗi nhỏ không ảnh hưởng communication
Pronunciation	6-7	Rõ ràng, dễ hiểu, stress và intonation cơ bản đúng

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Cover đầy đủ tất cả bullet points theo đúng thứ tự
• ✅ Có structure rõ ràng với introduction và reasons
• ✅ Đủ thời lượng (1.5-2 phút)
• ✅ Ý tưởng relevant và easy to follow

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Từ vựng chưa sophisticated (very successful, very hard, interesting things)
• ⚠️ Thiếu specific examples về achievements (nói chung chung “made them successful”)
• ⚠️ Explanation phần “why admire” còn surface-level, chưa analyze sâu impact và values

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

The public figure I’d like to talk about is Dr. Jane Goodall, who is widely recognized as one of the world’s most influential primatologists and conservationists. She’s now in her late 80s but remains remarkably active in her field.

Dr. Goodall has dedicated her entire life to studying chimpanzees and promoting wildlife conservation. Her most groundbreaking work began in the 1960s when she went to Tanzania to observe chimpanzees in their natural habitat. What made her research revolutionary was that she discovered chimpanzees make and use tools, which was previously thought to be uniquely human. She also documented their complex social behaviors and emotional lives, which fundamentally changed how we understand primates and our relationship with the animal kingdom. Beyond research, she founded the Jane Goodall Institute, which works on conservation and environmental education programs globally.

I first learned about her work through a documentary I watched during high school, and since then, I’ve kept up with her activities through various sources – books, TED talks, and social media. She’s someone who maintains a strong presence in the environmental movement despite her age.

What I find most admirable about Dr. Goodall’s work is her unwavering commitment to conservation over more than six decades. She didn’t just conduct research and publish papers – she translated her scientific findings into meaningful action by establishing educational programs that empower local communities to protect their environment. I’m also impressed by her ability to bridge the gap between science and the general public. She communicates complex scientific concepts in ways that inspire people to care about wildlife. Moreover, her work has shown that one person with dedication can create lasting impact on both scientific understanding and environmental policy. Her approach demonstrates that true success isn’t just about personal achievement but about creating positive change that benefits future generations.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Nói trôi chảy 2-2.5 phút không hesitation, cohesive devices varied (Beyond research, Moreover, despite), logical progression
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range với precision (widely recognized as, influential primatologists, groundbreaking work, revolutionary, uniquely human, unwavering commitment), good collocations
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Complex structures (relative clauses, what-clauses, participles), passive voice, subordination, minimal errors
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear với good stress patterns và natural intonation

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“very successful”, “interesting things”	“widely recognized as”, “groundbreaking work”, “revolutionary”, “unwavering commitment”
Grammar	Simple: “He works very hard”	Complex: “What made her research revolutionary was that…”, “which fundamentally changed…”
Ideas	General: “helps solve climate change”	Specific: “discovered chimpanzees make and use tools, which was previously thought to be uniquely human”

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to tell you about Malala Yousafzai, a Pakistani activist who has become a global icon for education rights and women’s empowerment. Despite being only in her mid-20s, she’s already achieved what most people couldn’t accomplish in a lifetime.

Malala’s work centers on advocating for girls’ education, particularly in regions where access to schooling is restricted. What makes her story exceptionally compelling is that she began this work at the remarkably young age of 11, writing a blog under a pseudonym for BBC about life under Taliban rule in Pakistan’s Swat Valley. Her outspoken advocacy for education rights made her a target, and at 15, she survived an assassination attempt that would have silenced most people. However, rather than retreating from the public eye, she intensified her efforts, eventually founding the Malala Fund, an organization that champions girls’ education in developing countries. She also became the youngest-ever Nobel Peace Prize laureate at 17, and she’s now leveraging her platform to influence policy makers and mobilize resources for educational initiatives worldwide.

I first became aware of Malala’s work when the news of the attack on her broke internationally. Since then, I’ve followed her journey closely through her autobiography “I Am Malala,” various interviews, and her organization’s reports. What’s particularly striking is how she’s maintained her authenticity and stayed grounded despite global fame.

What I find most admirable about Malala’s work is the sheer courage she embodies. She didn’t just bounce back from a life-threatening experience – she transformed personal tragedy into a catalyst for global change. This demonstrates an extraordinary level of resilience that goes far beyond what most would consider possible. More importantly, her work addresses a fundamental human rights issue that affects millions of girls who are systematically denied educational opportunities. She’s not working on surface-level problems; she’s tackling the root causes of gender inequality and poverty.

What also sets her apart is her approach to activism. Unlike some public figures who adopt causes for publicity, Malala’s commitment is deeply personal and rooted in her lived experience. She speaks with moral authority because she’s lived through the very oppression she’s fighting against. Additionally, I admire how she navigates the complexities of international advocacy while remaining connected to grassroots realities. She doesn’t just make speeches – the Malala Fund implements concrete programs that have tangible outcomes.

Perhaps what resonates with me most is that she proves that age and background need not be barriers to making a substantial impact. Her work challenges the notion that you need to be in a position of traditional power to create change. She exemplifies how conviction, courage, and consistency can amplify an individual’s voice to reach global consciousness. In an era where we’re often bombarded with stories of corruption and self-interest among public figures, Malala represents the antithesis – someone who genuinely prioritizes collective welfare over personal gain.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Completely fluent với sophisticated progression, rich cohesive devices (However, More importantly, Additionally, Perhaps), natural pauses for emphasis
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Sophisticated và precise (global icon, exceptionally compelling, outspoken advocacy, survived an assassination attempt, champions girls’ education, leveraging her platform, sheer courage, transformed personal tragedy into a catalyst, systematically denied, speaks with moral authority), idiomatic expressions natural
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range of structures with flexibility và accuracy (cleft sentences, advanced relative clauses, participles, conditionals), virtually error-free
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Completely natural với appropriate stress, rhythm, intonation, easily understood

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:

• Nói liên tục 2.5-3 phút với natural rhythm không robot-like
• Pauses có mục đích cho emphasis chứ không phải do hesitation
• Discourse markers sophisticated (What also sets her apart, Perhaps what resonates with me most)

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• Ví dụ: “a global icon” thay vì “famous person” – demonstrates precision
• “transformed personal tragedy into a catalyst” – metaphorical language showing high-level thinking
• “the sheer courage she embodies” – abstract noun + collocation
• “systematically denied” – precise academic word
• “the antithesis” – sophisticated vocabulary showing contrast

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Ví dụ: “Despite being only in her mid-20s, she’s already achieved what most people couldn’t accomplish in a lifetime” – complex sentence với contrast và relative clause
• “Rather than retreating from the public eye, she intensified her efforts” – gerund phrase showing contrast
• Cleft sentence: “What I find most admirable…” – emphasizes key point

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:

• Không chỉ nói “she helps girls go to school” mà phân tích deeper về “fundamental human rights issue”, “root causes of gender inequality”
• So sánh với public figures khác để highlight what makes her unique
• Reflects on broader implications: “challenges the notion that you need to be in a position of traditional power”
• Personal connection sophisticated: “what resonates with me most”

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2 để transition sang Part 3:

Question 1: Do you think more young people are interested in social causes nowadays?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, I think so. Many young people care about environmental and social problems now. They use social media to share information and organize activities.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Absolutely. I’d say there’s been a notable shift in youth engagement with social causes, partly because digital platforms have lowered the barriers to activism. Young people can now mobilize quickly, raise awareness, and even influence policy in ways that weren’t possible for previous generations. However, whether this translates into sustained commitment rather than just performative activism remains to be seen.”

---

Question 2: Is it important for public figures to use their influence for good?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, it’s very important. Famous people have many followers, so they can help spread good messages and encourage people to do positive things.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“I believe they have a moral responsibility to do so, though it’s a contentious issue. Given their disproportionate influence and access to platforms, public figures are uniquely positioned to draw attention to important causes. That said, we should be careful not to over-rely on celebrity advocacy, as systemic change ultimately requires institutional reform rather than just individual goodwill.”

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi trừu tượng và phức tạp hơn, yêu cầu bạn phân tích, so sánh và đánh giá các khía cạnh rộng hơn của chủ đề. Đây là phần khó nhất vì examiner muốn thấy khả năng critical thinking và discuss abstract concepts.

Bạn cần:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời thành 3-5 câu với analysis sâu
• Sử dụng discourse markers tự nhiên (Well, Actually, I suppose…)
• Đưa ra examples từ society, trends, không chỉ personal experience
• Thừa nhận complexity của issues (both sides, depends on…)
• Show awareness về different perspectives

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời ngắn như Part 1, thiếu elaboration
• Không có clear position hoặc reasoning
• Thiếu academic/abstract vocabulary
• Examples quá personal thay vì societal

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Role and Influence of Public Figures

---

Question 1: Why do you think people are so fascinated by the lives of famous people?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause-Effect (Why…)
• Key words: fascinated, lives of famous people
• Cách tiếp cận: Explain psychological/social reasons → Give examples → Consider different types of fascination (healthy vs unhealthy)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think people are interested in famous people because they want to know about their lifestyles. Famous people often have money and success, so ordinary people are curious about how they live. Also, social media makes it easy to follow celebrities, so people can see what they’re doing every day. Some people also want to learn from successful people to improve their own lives.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có reasons với examples nhưng still surface-level
• Vocabulary: Basic (interested, want to know, ordinary people)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate explanation nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Well, I think there are several psychological factors at play here. Firstly, there’s an element of escapism – people living ordinary lives find it intriguing to peer into the seemingly glamorous world of celebrities, which offers a temporary respite from their daily routines. It’s human nature to be curious about those who have achieved extraordinary success or possess exceptional talents.

Beyond that, I’d say social comparison plays a significant role. People often benchmark themselves against public figures, whether consciously or unconsciously, as a way of measuring their own achievements or validating their life choices. This can be both motivating and detrimental, depending on how individuals process that information.

Additionally, in today’s hyperconnected digital landscape, celebrities have become more accessible than ever before. Social media has blurred the boundaries between public and private lives, creating an illusion of intimacy that makes people feel personally connected to figures they’ve never met. This parasocial relationship can be quite powerful, explaining why fans feel emotionally invested in celebrities’ successes and failures.

However, I think it’s worth noting that this fascination becomes problematic when it crosses the line into obsession or when it fuels unrealistic expectations about life and success.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized: Multiple reasons (escapism, social comparison, digital accessibility) → Each developed with explanation → Concluding nuance about problems
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated (psychological factors at play, escapism, peer into, temporary respite, human nature, benchmark themselves against, hyperconnected digital landscape, blurred the boundaries, illusion of intimacy, parasocial relationship, emotionally invested, crosses the line into)
• Grammar: Complex với range of structures: there’s…, I’d say…, depending on how…, this can be…, it’s worth noting that…
• Critical Thinking: Shows balanced view, acknowledges both positive aspects và problematic side, demonstrates understanding of psychology và sociology

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, Firstly, Beyond that, Additionally, However
• Tentative language: I think, I’d say, can be, it’s worth noting
• Abstract nouns: escapism, comparison, illusion, intimacy, obsession, expectations
• Academic collocations: psychological factors at play, human nature, social comparison, parasocial relationship

---

Question 2: Do you think celebrities have too much influence on young people today?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion (Do you think…)
• Key words: too much influence, young people
• Cách tiếp cận: State position → Explain why/why not → Give balanced view → Examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think celebrities have a lot of influence on young people today. Young people want to be like their favorite stars, so they copy their style and behavior. This can be bad if celebrities do wrong things, because young people might follow them. However, some celebrities are good role models and inspire young people to work hard and help others. So it depends on the celebrity.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position với basic reasoning
• Vocabulary: Simple (a lot of, copy, bad, good role models)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Answers the question nhưng lacks depth và nuanced analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“I’d say the issue is more nuanced than simply having too much or too little influence. What concerns me is not the magnitude of their influence but rather the nature of it and the lack of critical filtering among young audiences.

On one hand, celebrities can serve as powerful catalysts for positive change. When they use their platforms to champion important causes like mental health awareness or environmental conservation, they can reach demographics that traditional advocacy groups might struggle to engage. We’ve seen this with figures like Emma Watson promoting gender equality or Leonardo DiCaprio advocating for climate action – their involvement has demonstrably amplified these conversations.

On the other hand, there’s a troubling trend of uncritical admiration where young people emulate celebrities without discerning which aspects are worth adopting. The pervasive influence of social media means young people are constantly bombarded with curated, often unrealistic portrayals of success, beauty, and lifestyle. This can foster unhealthy comparisons and create distorted expectations about what constitutes a meaningful life.

What’s particularly concerning is the commercialization of influence. Many celebrities are essentially walking advertisements, and young people may not always recognize when they’re being subjected to marketing tactics disguised as genuine recommendations. This blurs the line between authentic influence and commercial manipulation.

Ultimately, I think the solution isn’t to diminish celebrity influence but rather to equip young people with critical thinking skills so they can navigate this influence more wisely. Educational systems should place greater emphasis on media literacy to help young people distinguish between aspirational content and reality.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated: Nuanced opening (it’s not simple) → Positive aspects with examples → Negative aspects with analysis → Specific concern about commercialization → Solution-oriented conclusion
• Vocabulary: Highly academic (nuanced, magnitude vs nature, catalysts, demographics, demonstrably amplified, troubling trend, uncritical admiration, emulate, discerning, pervasive influence, foster unhealthy comparisons, distorted expectations, subjected to marketing tactics, diminish, equip, navigate, aspirational content)
• Grammar: Full range with conditionals, relative clauses, participles, cleft sentences
• Critical Thinking: Refuses simplistic answer, considers multiple dimensions, provides specific examples, proposes solutions, shows awareness of underlying mechanisms

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: On one hand, On the other hand, What’s particularly concerning, Ultimately
• Tentative language: I’d say, can serve as, may not always, I think
• Academic vocabulary: magnitude, demographics, pervasive, foster, distorted, commercialization, manipulation
• Sophisticated structures: “What concerns me is not X but rather Y”, “This can foster…”, “the solution isn’t to X but rather to Y”

Nếu bạn muốn tìm hiểu thêm về các chủ đề speaking khác, bạn có thể tham khảo bài viết về describe a time when you had to make a sacrifice, nơi cung cấp các chiến lược trả lời cho những tình huống cần thể hiện sự hy sinh cá nhân.

Theme 2: Fame and Success

Question 3: What qualities do you think a person needs to become successful in the public eye?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion about qualities/characteristics
• Key words: qualities, successful, public eye
• Cách tiếp cận: List several qualities → Explain each with reasoning → Consider how these differ across fields

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“To be successful as a public figure, I think people need to be talented at what they do. They also need to work hard and be determined to achieve their goals. Good communication skills are important too because they need to talk to the media and the public. Being confident also helps them perform well under pressure.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists qualities với brief explanations
• Vocabulary: Basic (talented, work hard, good communication skills, confident)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response with relevant points nhưng lacks sophistication

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“I think the qualities required vary considerably depending on the field, but there are some universal traits that seem to cut across different domains of public achievement.

First and foremost, resilience is absolutely crucial. The path to public recognition is invariably fraught with setbacks, criticism, and periods of doubt. Those who succeed are typically individuals who can weather these storms without losing sight of their core purpose. We see this with virtually every successful public figure – they’ve persevered through failures that would have deterred most people.

Coupled with resilience is adaptability. The public landscape is constantly evolving, especially with rapid technological changes. Those who remain relevant are those who can reinvent themselves while maintaining their authenticity. Think about how certain artists or entrepreneurs have successfully navigated shifting cultural trends without compromising their core values.

I’d also emphasize the importance of strategic communication skills. It’s not enough to be talented or accomplished – you need to be able to articulate your vision and connect with diverse audiences. This involves emotional intelligence and the ability to read social dynamics, which helps public figures build rapport and maintain credibility.

Interestingly, I think timing and luck play roles that are often underestimated. Some people have the right skills and work ethic but emerge at moments when the public is particularly receptive to what they offer. However, I’d argue that truly successful individuals are those who create their own opportunities rather than merely waiting for lucky breaks.

Finally, there’s an element of authenticity that’s become increasingly important in our age of heightened scrutiny. The public has become more discerning and can often detect insincerity. Those who present a genuine version of themselves, even with all their flaws, tend to build more sustainable public followings than those who project carefully manufactured personas.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated: Acknowledges variation → Multiple qualities each thoroughly explained with examples → Considers underestimated factors → Contemporary trends
• Vocabulary: Exceptional (vary considerably, universal traits, cut across, invariably fraught with, weather these storms, persevered through, coupled with, navigate shifting cultural trends, articulate your vision, emotional intelligence, read social dynamics, underestimated, heightened scrutiny, discerning, detect insincerity, sustainable, manufactured personas)
• Grammar: Complex range including relative clauses, participles, conditionals, emphatic structures
• Critical Thinking: Nuanced understanding showing qualities are context-dependent, considers both obvious và overlooked factors, addresses contemporary changes (authenticity in digital age)

---

Question 4: How has social media changed the way people become famous?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Change/Development (How has… changed)
• Key words: social media, become famous
• Cách tiếp cận: Contrast past vs present → Explain mechanisms → Evaluate positive/negative aspects → Future implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Social media has changed fame a lot. In the past, people became famous through TV, movies, or music. Now, anyone can become famous on social media like YouTube or Instagram. People can share their content directly with followers without needing TV companies. This is good because more people have opportunities, but it also means there are many famous people who are not very talented.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic comparison past vs present với brief evaluation
• Vocabulary: Simple (changed a lot, share content, more people)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses the question với basic analysis nhưng lacks depth

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Social media has fundamentally democratized the path to fame in ways that would have been unimaginable just two decades ago. This shift represents a seismic change in how recognition and influence are acquired and sustained.

Traditionally, becoming a public figure required gatekeepers – publishers, record labels, studios, or media executives who controlled access to mass audiences. This hierarchical system meant that fame was relatively scarce and concentrated among a select few. Social media has dismantled these barriers, enabling individuals to build audiences directly without intermediary approval. We’ve witnessed the rise of self-made influencers who’ve cultivated massive followings through authentic content rather than manufactured celebrity status.

This democratization has both empowering and problematic dimensions. On the positive side, it’s leveled the playing field for people from diverse backgrounds who previously lacked access to traditional media channels. We’re seeing voices and perspectives that were historically marginalized now gaining prominence. Someone from a small town can now reach millions if their content resonates.

However, this accessibility has also diluted the concept of fame itself. We’ve moved from a culture of celebrity to a culture of micro-celebrity, where fame is more fragmented and ephemeral. The viral nature of social media means people can achieve fleeting notoriety without substantive talent or contribution. There’s also the troubling phenomenon of fame becoming an end in itself rather than a byproduct of meaningful work.

Moreover, social media fame often demands constant content production and self-promotion, which can be psychologically taxing. The metrics-driven environment – likes, shares, followers – creates validation cycles that can be both addictive and anxiety-inducing. Unlike traditional celebrities who maintained some degree of privacy, social media personalities often feel pressure to share increasingly intimate aspects of their lives to maintain engagement.

Looking ahead, I think we’ll see continued evolution in how fame operates, possibly with emerging platforms creating entirely new types of public figures. What remains to be seen is whether this saturated landscape will lead to meaningful democratization of influence or simply create new forms of inequality.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Extremely sophisticated: Historical context → Explanation of mechanism → Balanced evaluation (positive and negative) → Psychological/social implications → Future considerations
• Vocabulary: Advanced academic (fundamentally democratized, seismic change, gatekeepers, hierarchical system, dismantled barriers, cultivated massive followings, diluted the concept, fragmented and ephemeral, fleeting notoriety, troubling phenomenon, metrics-driven environment, validation cycles, psychologically taxing, saturated landscape)
• Grammar: Full range với perfect mastery (relative clauses, participles, conditionals, emphatic structures)
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis considering historical change, mechanisms, implications across different domains (social, psychological, cultural), future trends, acknowledges complexity without simplistic conclusions

Ảnh hưởng của mạng xã hội đến cách mọi người trở nên nổi tiếng trong thời đại hiện đại

Theme 3: Responsibility and Ethics

Question 5: Should public figures be held to higher moral standards than ordinary people?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion with ethical consideration (Should…)
• Key words: public figures, higher moral standards, ordinary people
• Cách tiếp cận: Present different perspectives → Your position with reasoning → Consider practical implications → Nuanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think public figures should be good role models because many people look up to them, especially young people. If they do bad things, it can have a bad influence on society. However, they are also human and can make mistakes like everyone else. So I think they should try to be good examples but we shouldn’t expect them to be perfect.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Simple position với basic reasoning and acknowledgment of complexity
• Vocabulary: Elementary (good role models, bad things, bad influence, make mistakes)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses both sides nhưng analysis remains superficial

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is a contentious question that touches on fundamental tensions between public responsibility and personal freedom. I’d argue that the answer is more complex than a simple yes or no.

On one hand, there’s a compelling argument for higher standards. Public figures, by virtue of their visibility and influence, wield disproportionate power to shape attitudes and behaviors, particularly among impressionable audiences. When they engage in unethical conduct, the ripple effects can be significant. A politician’s corruption can undermine trust in democratic institutions; a business leader’s malfeasance can erode confidence in economic systems. From this perspective, accepting public prominence comes with implicit responsibilities to uphold certain standards.

However, I think we need to be cautious about imposing unrealistic expectations. Public figures are, fundamentally, human beings with the same capacity for error and moral complexity as anyone else. Placing them on pedestals and demanding perfection not only sets them up for inevitable failure but also creates a hypocritical dynamic where we vilify them for the same flaws we tolerate in ourselves. This can lead to destructive cancel culture where single mistakes result in disproportionate consequences.

What I find more constructive is to distinguish between professional conduct and personal life. Public figures should absolutely be held accountable for actions within their professional sphere – politicians for their governance decisions, business leaders for their corporate ethics, scientists for their research integrity. However, their private lives, provided they don’t involve illegal activity or direct harm to others, should perhaps be afforded more privacy than current media culture allows.

Additionally, I think the standards should vary according to the nature of their public role. Someone who explicitly positions themselves as a moral or educational leader – like a religious figure or children’s entertainer – reasonably invites higher scrutiny than, say, an athlete or artist whose primary contribution is in a different domain. Context matters.

Ultimately, rather than simply demanding higher standards, I think society should focus on fostering accountability mechanisms that apply consistently to everyone, public figure or not. The problem isn’t necessarily that we hold celebrities to higher standards, but that we often fail to hold powerful people accountable at all, while simultaneously obsessing over relatively trivial personal behaviors of public figures. We need more balanced, proportionate approaches to evaluating conduct, regardless of someone’s fame or status.”

Tương tự như trong describe a situation when you were very happy, việc phân tích cảm xúc và động lực của nhân vật công chúng cũng yêu cầu khả năng suy nghĩ sâu sắc và diễn đạt tinh tế.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally sophisticated: Acknowledges complexity → Argument for higher standards → Counter-argument against → Proposes nuanced distinction (professional vs personal) → Considers variation by role → Systemic solution rather than individual judgment
• Vocabulary: Highly advanced (contentious question, fundamental tensions, compelling argument, wield disproportionate power, ripple effects, malfeasance, erode confidence, implicit responsibilities, imposing unrealistic expectations, placing them on pedestals, vilify, destructive cancel culture, fostering accountability mechanisms, obsessing over)
• Grammar: Full mastery with sophisticated structures throughout
• Critical Thinking: Refuses binary thinking, considers multiple perspectives, proposes distinctions, context-dependent thinking, addresses systemic issues rather than individual blame

---

Question 6: Do you think the media invades the privacy of famous people too much?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion about media ethics
• Key words: media, invades privacy, famous people, too much
• Cách tiếp cận: Define reasonable boundaries → Explain current problems → Consider public interest vs privacy → Different types of public figures

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think the media sometimes goes too far. Famous people also need private lives and time with their families. Paparazzi follow them everywhere and take pictures without permission, which is not fair. However, some famous people want publicity, so they share a lot about their lives. The media should respect their privacy but also report important news about them.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position với examples và some nuance
• Vocabulary: Basic (goes too far, private lives, not fair, important news)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response addressing the question but lacking sophisticated analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“I think this issue sits at the intersection of several competing interests – press freedom, public curiosity, and individual privacy – making it particularly thorny to navigate.

There’s no question that certain media practices cross ethical lines. The intrusive tactics employed by some outlets – stalking, harassment, using telephoto lenses to capture private moments – constitute genuine invasions of privacy that can have severe psychological consequences. We’ve seen tragic cases where relentless media attention has contributed to mental health crises or worse among public figures. The death of Princess Diana is perhaps the most stark reminder of how media intrusion can turn lethal.

However, I think we need to draw distinctions between different types of privacy invasion and different categories of public figures. There’s a legitimate argument that elected officials and those in positions of significant power should have less expectation of privacy regarding matters that might bear on their fitness for their roles. If a politician’s financial dealings suggest corruption, or a CEO’s personal conduct reveals conflicts of interest, the public arguably has a right to know. This is different from tabloid coverage of an actor’s romantic life, which typically serves no purpose beyond satisfying voyeuristic curiosity.

The challenge is that the line between “public interest” and “interesting to the public” has become increasingly blurred. Media outlets often invoke public interest to justify coverage that is really just gossip. The profit-driven nature of media means there’s tremendous incentive to sensationalize and intrude, as this content generates clicks and drives revenue.

What’s particularly problematic is the symbiotic relationship that’s developed between celebrities and media. Some public figures actively court media attention when it suits them, then cry foul when that same attention becomes unwanted. This makes it difficult to establish clear boundaries. Social media has complicated this further, as many celebrities willingly share intimate details of their lives online, which can be perceived as lowering the bar for what constitutes private information.

I think the solution requires a multi-pronged approach. We need stronger legal protections against genuinely invasive practices like harassment and unauthorized photography in private spaces. Media organizations should adopt and enforce ethical guidelines that prioritize the dignity and safety of their subjects. But equally important is cultivating media literacy among the public, so people understand that consuming invasive content creates the market demand that perpetuates these practices.

Ultimately, while fame does entail some loss of privacy, it shouldn’t grant carte blanche for media to disregard basic human dignity. The question isn’t whether famous people deserve privacy, but rather where we draw the line between legitimate public interest and exploitative voyeurism.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated: Identifies competing interests → Acknowledges serious problems with examples → Draws nuanced distinctions (types of figures, types of privacy) → Analyzes systemic issues (profit motive, symbiotic relationship) → Proposes multi-faceted solution → Principled conclusion
• Vocabulary: Exceptional academic register (sits at the intersection of, thorny to navigate, intrusive tactics, constitute, severe psychological consequences, stark reminder, bear on, conflicts of interest, voyeuristic curiosity, invoke, profit-driven, tremendous incentive, symbiotic relationship, cry foul, multi-pronged approach, grant carte blanche, exploitative voyeurism)
• Grammar: Full mastery with varied complex structures throughout
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis considering ethics, economics, psychology, technology, law; refuses simplistic answers; proposes systemic rather than individual solutions; acknowledges complexity and contradictions

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
public figure	noun phrase	/ˈpʌblɪk ˈfɪɡə(r)/	nhân vật công chúng	“Dr. Goodall is a respected public figure in conservation.”	prominent public figure, controversial public figure, influential public figure
groundbreaking	adj	/ˈɡraʊndbreɪkɪŋ/	mang tính đột phá, mở đường	“Her groundbreaking research changed scientific understanding.”	groundbreaking work, groundbreaking discovery, groundbreaking achievement
dedicate oneself to	verb phrase	/ˈdedɪkeɪt wʌnˈself tuː/	cống hiến bản thân cho	“He dedicated himself to improving education in rural areas.”	dedicate time to, dedicate life to, dedicate resources to
unwavering commitment	noun phrase	/ʌnˈweɪvərɪŋ kəˈmɪtmənt/	sự cam kết không lay chuyển	“Her unwavering commitment to justice inspires many.”	show unwavering commitment, demonstrate unwavering commitment, maintain unwavering commitment
champion	verb	/ˈtʃæmpiən/	đấu tranh cho, ủng hộ mạnh mẽ	“She champions the rights of marginalized communities.”	champion a cause, champion rights, champion reform
leverage	verb	/ˈlevərɪdʒ/	tận dụng, khai thác (ưu thế)	“He leverages his platform to raise awareness about climate change.”	leverage influence, leverage resources, leverage opportunities
resilience	noun	/rɪˈzɪliəns/	khả năng phục hồi, sức bật	“Her resilience after the accident was remarkable.”	demonstrate resilience, build resilience, show resilience
navigate	verb	/ˈnævɪɡeɪt/	vượt qua, điều hướng (khó khăn)	“She successfully navigated the challenges of starting a business.”	navigate challenges, navigate complexities, navigate difficulties
catalyst	noun	/ˈkætəlɪst/	chất xúc tác, động lực thúc đẩy	“His work became a catalyst for policy reform.”	catalyst for change, act as a catalyst, serve as a catalyst
empower	verb	/ɪmˈpaʊə(r)/	trao quyền, làm mạnh mẽ hơn	“The program empowers women through education and training.”	empower people, empower communities, empower individuals
tackle	verb	/ˈtækl/	giải quyết (vấn đề khó)	“She tackles root causes of poverty rather than symptoms.”	tackle issues, tackle problems, tackle challenges
exemplify	verb	/ɪɡˈzemplɪfaɪ/	minh họa, là tấm gương	“He exemplifies the values of integrity and hard work.”	exemplify qualities, exemplify values, exemplify principles
amplify	verb	/ˈæmplɪfaɪ/	khuếch đại, làm lan rộng	“Social media amplifies their message to millions.”	amplify voice, amplify message, amplify impact
foster	verb	/ˈfɒstə(r)/	nuôi dưỡng, khuyến khích phát triển	“The organization fosters innovation in renewable energy.”	foster development, foster understanding, foster relationships
mobilize	verb	/ˈməʊbəlaɪz/	huy động	“She mobilized volunteers to support the campaign.”	mobilize resources, mobilize support, mobilize community
stigma	noun	/ˈstɪɡmə/	sự kỳ thị, dấu ấn xấu	“He works to reduce stigma around mental health issues.”	social stigma, break down stigma, challenge stigma
advocacy	noun	/ˈædvəkəsi/	sự vận động, ủng hộ	“Her advocacy for human rights earned international recognition.”	advocacy work, advocacy campaign, advocacy efforts
trailblazer	noun	/ˈtreɪlbleɪzə(r)/	người tiên phong	“She’s a trailblazer in women’s rights.”	regarded as a trailblazer, become a trailblazer
visionary	noun/adj	/ˈvɪʒənri/	người có tầm nhìn xa	“He’s a visionary leader in technology innovation.”	visionary leader, visionary approach, visionary ideas
philanthropy	noun	/fɪˈlænθrəpi/	hoạt động từ thiện	“His philanthropy focuses on education and healthcare.”	engage in philanthropy, philanthropy work, philanthropy efforts

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
make waves	tạo ảnh hưởng lớn, gây chú ý	“Her documentary made waves in the environmental movement.”	7.5-8
break new ground	mở ra hướng đi mới, đột phá	“His research broke new ground in treating the disease.”	7.5-8
at the forefront of	đi đầu trong lĩnh vực	“She’s at the forefront of cancer research.”	7.5-8
leave a lasting legacy	để lại di sản lâu dài	“Nelson Mandela left a lasting legacy of peace and reconciliation.”	8-9
ahead of their time	vượt thời đại	“His ideas about renewable energy were ahead of their time.”	7.5-8
make a meaningful impact	tạo ra tác động có ý nghĩa	“Her work made a meaningful impact on children’s education.”	7.5-8
go against the grain	đi ngược dòng, không theo số đông	“She went against the grain by challenging traditional practices.”	8-9
push the envelope	vượt qua giới hạn thông thường	“He constantly pushes the envelope in artistic expression.”	8-9
stand the test of time	tồn tại qua thời gian	“Her contributions to science will stand the test of time.”	7.5-8
pave the way for	mở đường cho	“She paved the way for future generations of women scientists.”	7.5-8
speak volumes about	nói lên nhiều điều về	“His dedication to the cause speaks volumes about his character.”	7.5-8
weather the storm	vượt qua khó khăn	“Despite criticism, she weathered the storm and continued her work.”	8-9

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ ngắn: “Well, I’d say there are several factors…”
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra thông tin bất ngờ hoặc chính xác hơn: “Actually, the situation is more complex than that…”
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi chia sẻ quan điểm thật: “To be honest, I have mixed feelings about this…”
• 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra ý kiến có cân nhắc: “I’d say that both approaches have merit…”
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Khi nhấn mạnh đây là quan điểm cá nhân: “From my perspective, education is the key…”

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó: “On top of that, she also founded several charities…”
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa (formal hơn Moreover): “What’s more, his influence extends beyond his field…”
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến: “Not to mention the numerous awards she’s received…”
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra: “Beyond that, he uses his platform to advocate for change…”
• 📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó (formal): “Additionally, her work has inspired millions…”

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác: “On the one hand, fame brings opportunities. On the other hand, it invades privacy.”
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét: “While it’s true that celebrities influence youth, we also need to consider parents’ role…”
• 📝 That said,… – Dù vậy, tuy nhiên: “His work is impressive. That said, some critics question his methods…”
• 📝 Having said that,… – Đã nói như vậy thì: “Fame can be rewarding. Having said that, it comes with significant pressures…”

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, nhìn chung: “All in all, I believe public figures have great responsibility…”
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì (informal): “At the end of the day, their impact depends on how they use their influence…”
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng, về cơ bản: “Ultimately, what matters most is their genuine commitment…”
• 📝 In the final analysis,… – Xét cho cùng (formal): “In the final analysis, their legacy will be judged by their contributions…”

Để giải thích và làm rõ:

• 📝 What I mean is,… – Ý tôi là: “Fame requires resilience. What I mean is, the ability to handle criticism…”
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác: “She champions education. In other words, she fights for every child’s right to learn…”
• 📝 To put it simply,… – Nói đơn giản: “To put it simply, he changed how we think about technology…”
• 📝 The point I’m making is,… – Điểm tôi muốn nói là: “The point I’m making is that influence comes with responsibility…”

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

• Mixed conditional:

  • Formula: If + past perfect, would + infinitive (mixing past condition with present result)
  • Ví dụ: “If Malala hadn’t survived the attack, millions of girls wouldn’t have the educational opportunities they have today.”

• Inversion (đảo ngữ):

  • Formula: Had + subject + past participle, would have…
  • Ví dụ: “Had she not dedicated her life to this cause, the situation would be drastically different.”
  • Formula: Should + subject + infinitive, will…
  • Ví dụ: “Should public figures abuse their influence, society must hold them accountable.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

• Non-defining relative clauses:

  • Ví dụ: “Dr. Jane Goodall, who is now in her late 80s, continues to advocate for conservation.”
  • Ví dụ: “Her work, which has spanned over six decades, has transformed our understanding of primates.”

• Reduced relative clauses:

  • Ví dụ: “Public figures using their platforms responsibly can inspire millions.” (who use → using)
  • Ví dụ: “The challenges faced by activists are immense.” (which are faced → faced)

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

• It is thought/believed/said that…

  • Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that public figures have moral obligations to their followers.”
  • Ví dụ: “It has been argued that celebrity culture undermines genuine achievement.”

• Advanced passive structures:

  • Ví dụ: “Her contributions are being recognized globally.” (present continuous passive)
  • Ví dụ: “The issue has been brought to public attention by several activists.” (present perfect passive)

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ – nhấn mạnh):

• What I find most… is…

  • Ví dụ: “What I find most admirable about her work is the consistency of her commitment.”
  • Ví dụ: “What makes him stand out is his willingness to take risks.”

• The thing that… is…

  • Ví dụ: “The thing that impresses me most is how she balances multiple roles.”
  • Ví dụ: “The reason why people admire him is his authenticity.”

• It is… that…

  • Ví dụ: “It is her dedication that sets her apart from others.”
  • Ví dụ: “It was through education that she empowered communities.”

5. Participle Clauses (Mệnh đề phân từ):

• Present participle (-ing):

  • Ví dụ: “Having faced numerous obstacles, she emerged stronger and more determined.”
  • Ví dụ: “Recognizing the urgency of the issue, he mobilized resources immediately.”

• Past participle (-ed):

  • Ví dụ: “Inspired by her story, millions of young people became activists.”
  • Ví dụ: “Armed with evidence, the journalist exposed the corruption.”

6. Inversion for Emphasis:

• Negative adverbials at the start:
  • Ví dụ: “Not only did she excel in her field, but she also inspired others to follow.”
  • Ví dụ: “Rarely have we seen such dedication to a cause.”
  • Ví dụ: “Never before has a public figure mobilized support so effectively.”

7. Nominalization (Danh từ hóa):

• Chuyển động từ thành danh từ để formal hơn:
  • contribute → contribution: “His contribution to science is immeasurable.”
  • dedicate → dedication: “Her dedication inspired a generation.”
  • influence → influence: “The influence of social media cannot be understated.”

Khi bạn cần thể hiện sự ngưỡng mộ đặc biệt, hãy kết hợp với cách trả lời trong describe a moment when you felt very thankful để làm phong phú câu trả lời về cảm xúc và động lực cá nhân.

Chiến Lược Trả Lời Hiệu Quả

Chuẩn Bị Trước Khi Thi

1. Chọn nhân vật phù hợp:

• Chọn người bạn thực sự biết rõ, không nên chọn người quá xa lạ
• Ưu tiên những người có thành tựu cụ thể, dễ mô tả
• Có thể là scientists, activists, entrepreneurs, educators (không chỉ entertainers)
• Tránh chọn politicians gây tranh cãi để avoid sensitive topics

2. Research và ghi chú:

• Đọc biography hoặc articles về người đó
• Note down specific achievements với numbers/facts (năm nhận giải, số người được giúp đỡ…)
• Tìm hiểu challenges họ đã overcome
• Chuẩn bị vocabulary liên quan đến field của họ

3. Practice structure:

• Tập nói với timer để ensure 2 phút
• Record và listen lại để check fluency, pronunciation
• Practice paraphrasing để avoid repetition
• Rehearse transitions giữa các bullet points

Trong Phòng Thi

Part 1 Tips:

• Mở rộng mỗi câu trả lời thành 2-3 câu (Direct answer → Reason → Example)
• Use discourse markers tự nhiên: “Well”, “Actually”, “To be honest”
• Vary tenses: mix past experiences với present opinions
• Show enthusiasm nhưng stay natural, không quá theatrical

Part 2 Tips:

Trong 1 phút chuẩn bị:

• Ghi keywords cho mỗi bullet point, KHÔNG viết câu
• Structure notes theo thứ tự đề bài
• Note 2-3 specific examples/achievements để elaborate
• Ghi từ vựng nâng cao bạn muốn use

Khi nói:

• Start confident: “I’d like to talk about…”
• Speak với natural pace, không rush
• Make eye contact với examiner occasionally
• Use hand gestures nhẹ nhàng để emphasize points (nhưng không overdo)
• Nếu blank, paraphrase lại ý vừa nói với từ khác để buy time
• Aim for 2-2.5 phút; nếu examiner stops bạn, đó là good sign

Part 3 Tips:

• Take a moment to think: “That’s an interesting question. Well, I think…”
• Structure answers: Point → Explanation → Example → Nuance
• Show critical thinking bằng cách acknowledge complexity: “It depends…”, “There are different perspectives…”
• Use conditional structures: “If…, then…”, “Should…, would…”
• Connect to current events hoặc trends: “In today’s digital age…”, “Given recent developments…”
• Don’t be afraid to say “I’m not entirely sure, but I think…” khi uncertain

Xử Lý Các Tình Huống Khó

1. Khi không biết từ vựng:

• Paraphrase: Thay vì “philanthropist” → “someone who dedicates their wealth to helping others”
• Use relative clauses: “the person who…” instead of job title
• Describe function instead of name: “organizations that help reduce poverty” thay vì “NGOs”

2. Khi blank/forget ý tưởng:

• Repeat lại câu cuối với paraphrase: “As I mentioned, her work focuses on… which means…”
• Use fillers appropriately: “Let me think…”, “How should I put it…”
• Move to next point: “Another aspect worth mentioning is…”
• KHÔNG im lặng hoàn toàn; keep talking even if slightly off-topic

3. Khi examiner interrupt:

• Đừng panic – đây là normal nếu bạn đã nói đủ
• Immediately stop và listen
• Answer new question, không cố finish câu cũ

4. Khi không understand câu hỏi:

• Lịch sự xin clarify: “Sorry, could you rephrase that?” or “Do you mean…?”
• Paraphrase lại để confirm: “So you’re asking whether…”
• KHÔNG đoán và answer completely wrong question

5. Khi nervous:

• Deep breath trước khi vào phòng
• Remember examiner muốn bạn succeed, không phải trick bạn
• Focus vào communication chứ không phải perfection
• Nếu make mistake, self-correct naturally và move on: “Sorry, I mean…”

Lỗi Thường Gặp Cần Tránh

❌ Memorizing templates: Examiners nhận ra instantly và score sẽ thấp
✅ Instead: Learn flexible structures và adapt cho từng câu hỏi

❌ Using overly complex vocabulary incorrectly: “He utilized his competencies to fabricate innovations”
✅ Instead: Use words bạn confident về meaning: “He used his skills to create new solutions”

❌ Speaking too fast: Trying to cram in nhiều từ vựng
✅ Instead: Natural pace với clear pronunciation

❌ Giving one-word answers trong Part 1: “Yes.” “No.”
✅ Instead: “Yes, I do. Actually, I find it quite interesting because…”

❌ Going off-topic trong Part 2: Nói quá nhiều về personal feelings, quên describe work
✅ Instead: Focus on achievement và impact của work

❌ Being too brief trong Part 3: Answering như Part 1
✅ Instead: Extended responses với analysis và examples

❌ Contradicting yourself: Saying different things về same topic
✅ Instead: Stay consistent hoặc acknowledge change: “Earlier I mentioned X, but actually…”

❌ Apologizing constantly: “Sorry, my English is bad”
✅ Instead: Speak confidently; examiners assess ability, không expect perfection

Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả trong bài thi IELTS Speaking về nhân vật công chúng

Lộ Trình Học Tập Đề Xuất

Giai Đoạn 1: Xây Dựng Nền Tảng (2-3 tuần)

Week 1-2: Vocabulary Building

• Học 10-15 từ vựng mỗi ngày liên quan đến achievements, work, influence
• Tạo flashcards với examples
• Practice using trong câu của riêng bạn
• Watch TED Talks về inspiring figures và note vocabulary

Week 2-3: Grammar Structures

• Focus on relative clauses, conditionals, passive voice
• Rewrite simple sentences thành complex ones
• Practice nominalization
• Do grammar exercises focusing on spoken accuracy

Giai Đoạn 2: Practice Intensive (3-4 tuần)

Week 3-4: Part 1 Practice

• Practice 50+ Part 1 questions về famous people, admiration, role models
• Record answers và self-assess
• Focus on extending answers naturally
• Work on natural discourse markers

Week 4-5: Part 2 Intensive

• Practice với 20+ different cue cards về people
• Time yourself strictly (1 min prep, 2 min speaking)
• Experiment với different structures
• Build bank of specific examples về different public figures

Week 5-6: Part 3 Deep Dive

• Practice analyzing abstract questions
• Work on critical thinking skills
• Learn to present balanced arguments
• Practice với partner hoặc tutor cho feedback

Giai Đoạn 3: Mock Tests và Refinement (2 tuần)

Week 7-8: Full Mock Tests

• Làm 4-6 full speaking tests trong conditions giống thật
• Get feedback từ experienced teachers/examiners
• Identify weaknesses và focus practice
• Work on confidence và managing nerves

Study Resources Khuyên Dùng

Books:

• “IELTS Speaking Actual Tests” – Recent questions
• “Vocabulary for IELTS Advanced” – Collocation focus
• Biography books của inspiring figures

Online:

• IELTS Liz (ielts-liz.com) – Free tips và sample answers
• IELTS Simon (ielts-simon.com) – Examiner perspectives
• BBC Podcasts – For natural English exposure
• TED Talks – Inspiring content và pronunciation models

Practice Partners:

• Find study partners on IELTS forums
• Join speaking practice groups
• Consider online tutors for personalized feedback
• Record conversations và review together

Trong quá trình học tập, bạn cũng nên tham khảo thêm các bài viết như describe a place you visited that exceeded your expectations để học cách mô tả chi tiết và sử dụng ngôn ngữ so sánh hiệu quả, kỹ năng này rất hữu ích khi nói về thành tựu của public figures.

Daily Practice Routine (30-45 phút)

Morning (15 phút):

• Review 10 vocabulary items
• Listen to 1 TED Talk segment (5 min)
• Shadow speaking (repeat after speaker) để improve pronunciation

Afternoon (15 phút):

• Practice answering 3-5 Part 1 questions
• Record và listen lại
• Note areas for improvement

Evening (15 phút):

• Practice 1 Part 2 cue card với timer
• HOẶC discuss 2-3 Part 3 questions với depth
• Write reflection về what went well/needs work

Tracking Progress

Weekly Review:

• Listen to recordings từ đầu tuần và cuối tuần
• Note improvements in fluency, vocabulary, confidence
• Identify persistent errors
• Adjust study plan accordingly

Self-Assessment Checklist:

• [ ] Có thể nói 2 phút liên tục không hesitation?
• [ ] Vocabulary range đa dạng hay còn lặp từ?
• [ ] Grammar có mixing simple và complex structures?
• [ ] Pronunciation rõ ràng không?
• [ ] Ideas có depth hay còn superficial?
• [ ] Discourse markers used naturally?
• [ ] Confident khi answer unexpected questions?

Lời Khuyên Từ Examiner

Với hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm chấm thi, tôi muốn chia sẻ những insights thực tế về những gì examiners thực sự đánh giá cao:

1. Authenticity Over Perfection

Chúng tôi có thể nhận ra ngay khi candidates đang recite memorized answers. Thà có một vài grammar mistakes nhỏ nhưng sound natural hơn là perfect grammar nhưng robotic. Examiners muốn nghe conversation, không phải presentation.

2. Ideas Matter More Than You Think

Nhiều candidates focus quá nhiều vào vocabulary fancy mà quên rằng content quality cũng crucial. A well-developed idea với simple words thường score cao hơn shallow idea với complex vocabulary used incorrectly. Trong Part 3 đặc biệt, critical thinking demonstrating through your arguments weighs heavily.

3. Natural Pauses Are OK

Đừng sợ pauses để think. Natural thinking pauses khác với awkward hesitations do lack vocabulary. Use fillers appropriately: “Well, let me think…”, “That’s an interesting point…” shows you’re processing the question thoughtfully.

4. Engagement With Examiner

Duy trì eye contact, show interest trong conversation. Examiners are human; engaging naturally làm atmosphere thoải mái hơn và performance của bạn often better. Don’t treat it như interrogation; treat it như interesting discussion.

5. Recovery From Mistakes

Tôi thấy nhiều candidates panic sau một mistake và performance sau đó collapse. Self-correct naturally nếu cần: “Sorry, I mean…” và move on. Examiners assess overall ability, not expect zero mistakes. How you recover shows communication skills.

6. Cultural Sensitivity

Khi talk about public figures, be mindful of cultural và political sensitivity. You can admire political figures nhưng focus on their policies/achievements rather than controversial political stances. This shows maturity và keeps conversation professional.

7. Listen Carefully

Part 3 questions sometimes có multiple parts. Make sure you address all aspects. If question asks “Why… and what impact…”, answer both. Missing parts là common error làm lose marks.

8. The First 30 Seconds Matter

First impression trong speaking test matters. Start confident, clear, với good energy. Even if you struggle later, strong start creates positive halo effect. Practice your opening lines nhiều lần.

9. Don’t Underestimate Pronunciation

This criterion often overlooked by candidates focusing on vocabulary/grammar. Clear pronunciation with appropriate stress và intonation can elevate entire performance. Không cần accent như native speaker, nhưng need to be easily understood.

10. Show Personality

IELTS Speaking assesses communication ability, not just language. Showing appropriate emotion, enthusiasm về topics makes you memorable và demonstrates natural communication. Don’t be bland; be human.

Tổng Kết

Chủ đề “Describe a public figure you admire for their work” là excellent opportunity để demonstrate range của English abilities. Success không chỉ về memorizing vocabulary mà về developing ability to discuss complex topics với depth, nuance, và authenticity.

Key takeaways:

✅ Choose wisely: Pick a public figure bạn genuinely admire và know well enough để elaborate

✅ Prepare flexibly: Build vocabulary bank và structures, nhưng adapt cho specific questions

✅ Practice extensively: Regular practice với timing và self-recording essential

✅ Think critically: Especially trong Part 3, show ability to analyze từ multiple perspectives

✅ Stay natural: Fluency và communication effectiveness often matter more than perfect grammar

✅ Manage nerves: Confidence comes from preparation; treat test như interesting conversation

Nhớ rằng IELTS Speaking đánh giá communication trong real-life contexts. The more you practice discussing topics bạn passionate về with depth và clarity, the better prepared you’ll be. Public figures và their work là rich topic cho practicing abstract thinking, evaluation, và expression of personal values – all skills valuable không chỉ cho IELTS mà cho academic và professional communication.

Nếu bạn đang tìm kiếm động lực để học tập hiệu quả, hãy xem thêm describe a situation when you were very motivated, nơi bạn có thể học cách diễn đạt về động lực và quyết tâm – những yếu tố quan trọng khi nói về nhân vật công chúng thành công.

Chúc bạn success trong IELTS Speaking test! Remember: Every great speaker started as a beginner. With consistent practice và right strategies, bạn hoàn toàn có thể achieve band score mục tiêu.