IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe a Recent News Story That Interested You” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề “Describe A Recent News Story That Interested You” là một trong những đề bài phổ biến và thực tế nhất trong phần thi IELTS Speaking Part 2. Với tư cách là một IELTS Examiner có hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm chấm thi, tôi nhận thấy chủ đề này xuất hiện đều đặn trong các kỳ thi từ năm 2018 đến nay, với tần suất khoảng 3-4 lần mỗi năm. Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai vẫn ở mức cao do tính thời sự và khả năng đánh giá toàn diện kỹ năng của thí sinh.

Chủ đề này đặc biệt quan trọng vì nó không chỉ kiểm tra khả năng sử dụng ngôn ngữ mà còn phản ánh sự quan tâm của bạn đến thế giới xung quanh – một yếu tố mà examiner đánh giá cao. Các góc độ thường được hỏi bao gồm: tin tức về khoa học công nghệ, môi trường, giáo dục, y tế, thể thao, và các vấn đề xã hội.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được:

• Câu hỏi thường gặp trong cả 3 Part với phân tích chi tiết
• Bài mẫu đạt chuẩn theo từng band điểm (6-7, 7.5-8, 8.5-9)
• Hơn 50 từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm về tin tức và truyền thông
• Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn Examiner
• Phân tích sâu về sự khác biệt giữa các band điểm
• Lời khuyên thực tế để tránh những lỗi phổ biến của học viên Việt Nam

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Thời gian của Part 1 thường kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về đời sống hàng ngày. Đặc điểm nổi bật là câu hỏi đơn giản, liên quan đến bản thân và thói quen của bạn. Chiến lược hiệu quả nhất là trả lời tự nhiên, mở rộng ý trong 2-3 câu để thể hiện khả năng giao tiếp.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong phần này:

• Trả lời quá ngắn chỉ một từ hoặc Yes/No
• Dùng từ vựng quá đơn giản, lặp đi lặp lại
• Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể để minh họa cho câu trả lời
• Không sử dụng discourse markers để câu trả lời tự nhiên hơn

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Dưới đây là những câu hỏi thực tế đã xuất hiện trong các kỳ thi IELTS gần đây:

Question 1: Do you often read or watch the news?

Question 2: What kind of news are you most interested in?

Question 3: How do you usually get your news?

Question 4: Do you prefer reading news online or in newspapers?

Question 5: Do you think it’s important to keep up with current events?

Question 6: How much time do you spend on news each day?

Question 7: Do you discuss news stories with your friends or family?

Question 8: Has your interest in news changed over the years?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

---

Question: Do you often read or watch the news?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có hay không
• Đưa ra tần suất cụ thể
• Giải thích lý do và thêm ví dụ về loại tin tức bạn theo dõi

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I read the news quite often, usually in the morning. I check my phone for the latest news about my country and the world. I think it’s important to know what’s happening around us.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, có đề cập thời gian và lý do
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng cơ bản (read, check, important), cấu trúc câu đơn giản, thiếu chi tiết cụ thể
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời rõ ràng nhưng chưa thể hiện được lexical range và grammatical variety

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Actually, I’m quite a news junkie and I make it a point to catch up on current affairs every morning over breakfast. I mainly scroll through various news apps on my phone, focusing particularly on breaking news about technology and environmental issues. I find that staying informed helps me engage in more meaningful conversations and keeps me connected to what’s happening both locally and globally.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng idiomatic expressions (news junkie, make it a point to), collocations tự nhiên (catch up on, breaking news, staying informed), cấu trúc câu đa dạng với present participle (focusing particularly on), và ý tưởng được phát triển logic với lý do cụ thể
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Thể hiện Fluency tốt với discourse marker “Actually”, Vocabulary tinh vi và tự nhiên, Grammar đa dạng với các cấu trúc phức tạp, và ideas được mở rộng một cách tự nhiên

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• news junkie: người nghiện tin tức
• catch up on: cập nhật thông tin về cái gì
• scroll through: lướt qua (màn hình)
• breaking news: tin nóng hổi
• staying informed: giữ mình được cập nhật thông tin

---

Question: What kind of news are you most interested in?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu rõ loại tin tức yêu thích
• Giải thích tại sao quan tâm đến loại tin đó
• Cho ví dụ cụ thể về một câu chuyện tin tức gần đây

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I like reading news about science and technology. I find these topics interesting because they are about new discoveries. For example, I recently read about artificial intelligence. These things will affect our future.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có nêu rõ loại tin tức và đưa ví dụ cụ thể
• Hạn chế: Lý do chưa thuyết phục, từ vựng lặp lại (interesting, these), câu ngắn và đơn giản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Nội dung đầy đủ cơ bản nhưng thiếu depth và sophistication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’m particularly drawn to science and technology news because I find it absolutely fascinating to see how innovation is reshaping our world. Just recently, I came across an in-depth article about breakthroughs in renewable energy technology, which really resonated with me given the pressing concerns about climate change. What I appreciate most about this type of news is that it’s forward-looking and gives me insights into how our lives might evolve in the coming decades.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary chính xác và đa dạng (drawn to, fascinating, innovation, reshaping), sử dụng relative clause một cách tự nhiên (which really resonated with me), ý tưởng sâu sắc về lý do quan tâm (forward-looking, insights into)
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency xuất sắc với các linking devices, Lexical Resource rộng với collocations tự nhiên (pressing concerns, in-depth article), Grammar phức tạp và chính xác, Ideas có chiều sâu và logic

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• be drawn to: bị thu hút bởi
• innovation: sự đổi mới, cải tiến
• breakthrough: đột phá
• resonate with someone: chạm đến cảm xúc, gây tiếng vang với ai
• pressing concerns: mối lo ngại cấp bách
• forward-looking: hướng về tương lai
• insights into: cái nhìn sâu sắc về

---

Question: How do you usually get your news?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Mô tả các nguồn tin tức bạn sử dụng
• So sánh các phương tiện khác nhau
• Giải thích lý do chọn phương tiện đó

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I usually get my news from social media and news websites. I use my phone to read news because it’s convenient. Sometimes I watch news on TV with my family. I don’t read newspapers much because they are old-fashioned.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Nêu được nhiều nguồn tin khác nhau, có so sánh cơ bản
• Hạn chế: Từ “convenient” quá phổ biến, thiếu specific vocabulary về media, không elaborate đủ về từng phương tiện
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response nhưng chưa sophisticated trong cách diễn đạt

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I primarily rely on a mix of digital platforms for my news consumption. My go-to sources include reputable news apps like BBC News and The Guardian, which I find offer well-balanced coverage and in-depth analysis. I also keep tabs on trending topics through social media, though I’m always mindful of verifying information from multiple sources given the prevalence of misinformation online. Occasionally, I’ll tune into news podcasts during my commute, as they provide comprehensive discussions on current issues. I’ve essentially phased out traditional newspapers, not because I don’t value them, but simply due to the immediacy and accessibility that digital media offers.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary đa dạng và precise (reputable, well-balanced coverage, prevalence, misinformation), cấu trúc câu phức tạp với multiple clauses, thể hiện critical thinking về việc verify information, sử dụng various verb forms (present simple, present perfect, gerunds)
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency hoàn hảo với natural connectors, Lexical Resource rất rộng với topic-specific vocabulary, Grammar range impressive với inversion và complex structures, Ideas nuanced và thoughtful

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• rely on: dựa vào, phụ thuộc vào
• digital platforms: nền tảng kỹ thuật số
• reputable: có uy tín
• well-balanced coverage: sự đưa tin cân bằng
• keep tabs on: theo dõi sát sao
• misinformation: thông tin sai lệch
• tune into: bật lên nghe/xem
• phase out: loại bỏ dần

Bạn có thể tham khảo thêm về describe an international news event that caught your attention để hiểu rõ hơn về cách mở rộng ý tưởng khi nói về tin tức quốc tế.

Học viên đang luyện tập IELTS Speaking Part 1 với examiner về chủ đề tin tức

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại quan trọng nhất trong bài thi IELTS Speaking, kéo dài 3-4 phút bao gồm cả thời gian chuẩn bị. Bạn có đúng 1 phút để chuẩn bị với giấy và bút được cung cấp, sau đó phải nói liên tục trong 2-3 phút mà không bị ngắt lời.

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

• Sử dụng đầy đủ 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi chú keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Nói đủ 2 phút, tối thiểu 1.5 phút để thể hiện khả năng fluency
• Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points trên cue card
• Sử dụng đúng thì động từ (thường là quá khứ khi kể về tin tức đã xảy ra)
• Tập trung vào bullet point cuối cùng “explain” vì đây là phần ghi điểm cao nhất

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Không tận dụng hết thời gian chuẩn bị, hoảng loạn trong 1 phút
• Nói quá ngắn, dưới 1.5 phút vì thiếu ideas hoặc vocabulary
• Bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points
• Không elaborate đủ ở phần “explain” – phần quan trọng nhất
• Học thuộc template khiến bài nói không tự nhiên

Cue Card

Describe a recent news story that interested you

You should say:

• What the news story was about
• When and where you heard or read about it
• What made this news story interesting to you
• And explain how this news story affected your thoughts or behavior

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an event/experience – Kể về một câu chuyện tin tức cụ thể

Thì động từ: Chủ yếu quá khứ đơn và quá khứ tiếp diễn (vì kể về tin tức đã xảy ra và bạn đã đọc/nghe), có thể dùng hiện tại hoàn thành khi nói về impact hiện tại

Bullet points phải cover:

• What: Nội dung chính của tin tức – cần specific, không nói chung chung
• When and where: Thời gian và nơi bạn tiếp cận tin tức – có thể nói về platform, circumstances
• What made it interesting: Lý do thu hút – cần personal connection, không chỉ nói “it’s important”
• Explain effect: Impact đến suy nghĩ hoặc hành vi – ĐÂY LÀ PHẦN QUAN TRỌNG NHẤT

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần “explain how this news story affected your thoughts or behavior” chiếm khoảng 40% band điểm của bài nói. Examiner muốn nghe critical thinking, personal reflection, và concrete examples về cách tin tức thay đổi perspective hoặc actions của bạn. Đừng nói chung chung như “it made me think” mà cần specific details.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about a news story I read a few weeks ago about climate change and renewable energy. I came across this news on my phone while I was having breakfast one morning. I usually check the news app before starting my day.

The story was about a new technology that can produce clean energy from ocean waves. Scientists developed a special device that can be placed in the ocean. This device captures the energy from waves and converts it into electricity. The article said this technology could provide power to many homes in coastal areas.

What made this news interesting to me was that I’ve always been worried about environmental problems. I think climate change is a serious issue and we need to find solutions. The idea of using ocean energy seemed very creative and practical to me. I also liked that it was a positive news story, not like other news about disasters or problems.

This news affected my thoughts in some ways. After reading it, I started paying more attention to environmental news. I also talked about it with my friends and family. We discussed how important it is to support clean energy. Now I try to save more energy at home by turning off lights and using less air conditioning. I believe small actions can make a difference.

Overall, this news story made me more hopeful about the future and more aware of environmental issues.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có sử dụng linking words cơ bản (while, after, also, overall), bài nói có logic rõ ràng nhưng còn đơn giản, có một vài hesitation có thể xảy ra
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng đủ dùng (renewable energy, climate change, device, converts) nhưng chưa sophisticated, thiếu collocations tự nhiên, lặp từ “news” nhiều lần
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Có sử dụng một số cấu trúc phức (relative clause “that can produce”, “while I was having”), nhưng phần lớn là simple sentences, thiếu variety
Pronunciation	6-7	Giả định rõ ràng, dễ hiểu, có thể có accent nhẹ nhưng không ảnh hưởng communication

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points trên cue card
• ✅ Có structure rõ ràng, dễ follow
• ✅ Đưa ra được personal opinion và impact cơ bản
• ✅ Nói đủ thời gian yêu cầu

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary còn basic, thiếu less common words và idiomatic expressions
• ⚠️ Grammar structures không đủ variety, chủ yếu simple và compound sentences
• ⚠️ Phần “explain effect” chưa đủ deep và specific, còn general (try to save energy, small actions)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to share a compelling news story that caught my attention about three weeks ago regarding a groundbreaking discovery in marine renewable energy. I stumbled upon this article while browsing through the BBC News app during my morning commute on the metro.

The story centered on a team of international scientists who had successfully developed an innovative wave energy converter that could harness power from ocean waves with unprecedented efficiency. What made this technology particularly noteworthy was its ability to generate electricity even in relatively calm sea conditions, unlike previous designs that required strong waves. The article highlighted that this device could potentially provide sustainable energy to millions of households in coastal regions, particularly in developing countries where access to electricity remains limited.

What really piqued my interest was the intersection of environmental sustainability and technological innovation. As someone who’s increasingly concerned about our planet’s future, I found it refreshing to read about a viable solution rather than just another doom-and-gloom report about climate change. The fact that it could benefit underserved communities made it even more meaningful to me. I was also intrigued by the engineering ingenuity behind the design, which apparently drew inspiration from the movement of fish fins.

This news story has had a notable impact on my perspective and actions. It reinforced my belief that technological advancement and environmental protection aren’t mutually exclusive, but can actually go hand in hand. Since reading this, I’ve become more proactive about seeking out positive environmental news to balance out the negative headlines. I’ve also started engaging in discussions about renewable energy with my colleagues, and we’ve even considered advocating for more sustainable practices in our workplace. On a personal level, it prompted me to research and eventually switch to a green energy provider for my home, which I’d been putting off for months.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Nói trôi chảy với minimal hesitation, sử dụng discourse markers sophisticatedly (What really, The fact that, Since reading this), cohesion tốt với referencing và logical flow
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Vocabulary range rộng với less common words (unprecedented, noteworthy, piqued my interest), natural collocations (doom-and-gloom, go hand in hand), appropriate use of phrasal verbs
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Variety của structures tốt: relative clauses, participle phrases (unlike previous designs), conditional implications, complex sentences với multiple clauses
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear articulation, good intonation patterns, natural stress và rhythm

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“new technology”, “clean energy”	“groundbreaking discovery”, “innovative wave energy converter”, “sustainable energy”
Grammar	“Scientists developed a device that can…”	“A team of scientists who had successfully developed…” (past perfect), “unlike previous designs that required…” (relative clause with contrast)
Ideas	“It’s important for environment”	“Intersection of environmental sustainability and technological innovation”, “technological advancement and environmental protection go hand in hand” – showing deeper analysis

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to tell you about an absolutely fascinating news story that genuinely left a lasting impression on me. It was approximately a month ago when I came across an in-depth feature article in The Guardian about a pioneering initiative in ocean-based renewable energy technology, and I must say, it was one of those rare news pieces that struck a chord with me on multiple levels.

The crux of the story revolved around a consortium of international researchers who had achieved what many had deemed impossible – they’d developed a state-of-the-art wave energy conversion system capable of harnessing marine power with remarkable efficiency, even in what would traditionally be considered sub-optimal conditions. What distinguished this breakthrough from previous attempts was its ingenious biomimetic design, essentially emulating the undulating movements of marine life. The implications were staggering – the technology could potentially revolutionize energy access in coastal communities across the developing world, where nearly 800 million people still lack reliable electricity.

What truly captivated me about this story was the confluence of several elements. Firstly, as someone who’s become progressively more conscious of our environmental footprint, I found it enormously heartening to encounter a narrative that offered tangible hope rather than the relentless barrage of apocalyptic predictions we’re typically bombarded with. Moreover, the socio-economic dimension really resonated with me – the idea that cutting-edge technology could bridge the inequality gap and empower marginalized communities was genuinely inspiring. I was also intellectually stimulated by the elegant simplicity of the engineering solution, which exemplified how biomimicry can lead to quantum leaps in technological advancement.

The ramifications of this news story on my thinking and behavior have been quite profound. It fundamentally shifted my perspective from doom-laden environmentalism to what I’d call optimistic pragmatism – recognizing that while challenges are immense, human ingenuity offers genuine pathways forward. This paradigm shift has manifested in several concrete ways. I’ve become far more discerning about my news consumption, actively seeking out solution-oriented journalism to counterbalance the negativity. I’ve also taken it upon myself to become something of an informal advocate for renewable energy among my social circle, often steering conversations toward constructive discussions about sustainability rather than just bemoaning problems.

Perhaps most significantly, this story catalyzed a complete overhaul of my personal energy choices. Within two weeks of reading it, I’d not only switched to a renewable energy provider but also delved into understanding the intricacies of different green technologies. I’ve even started attending local town hall meetings about municipal sustainability initiatives, something I’d never have envisaged myself doing before. In essence, what began as a morning read has blossomed into a genuine commitment to being part of the solution, however modest my contribution might be.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Exceptional fluency, không hesitation, sophisticated discourse markers (What truly captivated, Moreover, Perhaps most significantly), complex cohesive devices, ideas flow naturally và logically
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Wide range of sophisticated vocabulary sử dụng precisely và naturally (pioneering, crux, confluence, ramifications, paradigm shift), idiomatic language (struck a chord, left a lasting impression), collocations hoàn hảo (relentless barrage, quantum leaps)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range of structures: past perfect continuous, complex relatives, conditional sentences, inversion for emphasis, participial phrases, consistently accurate với flexibility
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Fully operational command, sustained appropriate intonation, natural rhythm và stress patterns

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói không có bất kỳ hesitation nào, các ý được kết nối seamlessly với sophisticated discourse markers. Thí sinh thể hiện khả năng tự nhiên trong việc elaborate ideas without losing coherence.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• Ví dụ: “confluence of several elements” thay vì “combination of things” – showing precise word choice
• “relentless barrage of apocalyptic predictions” – idiomatic và evocative
• “paradigm shift” và “quantum leaps” – abstract nouns sử dụng appropriately
• “doom-laden environmentalism” vs “optimistic pragmatism” – sophisticated contrast

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Ví dụ: “I’d not only switched… but also delved into…” – perfect inversion với complex parallel structure
• “What began as a morning read has blossomed into…” – cleft sentence với metaphorical language
• “something I’d never have envisaged myself doing” – past conditional perfect trong relative clause
• Multiple embeddings: “the idea that cutting-edge technology could bridge… was genuinely inspiring”

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Thí sinh không chỉ describe tin tức mà còn analyze its multiple dimensions (environmental, socio-economic, technological), demonstrate critical thinking (shift from doom to pragmatism), và provide concrete evidence of behavioral change (attending town halls, becoming advocate). The response shows intellectual depth và genuine engagement với topic.

Khi trả lời về các tin tức đặc biệt, bạn cũng có thể tham khảo thêm cách tiếp cận tương tự như describe a book that had a major impact on your life để hiểu cách phân tích impact một cách sâu sắc hơn.

Thí sinh tự tin trình bày bài nói IELTS Speaking Part 2 về tin tức với examiner

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Sau khi bạn hoàn thành phần độc thoại 2 phút, examiner thường sẽ hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn để kết thúc Part 2 trước khi chuyển sang Part 3. Những câu hỏi này thường liên quan trực tiếp đến những gì bạn vừa nói.

Question 1: Do you still follow updates about that news story?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, sometimes I check for new information about it online. I’m curious to see if the technology has developed further.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Actually, yes. I’ve been keeping tabs on the project’s progress through their official website and occasionally through environmental news outlets. I’m particularly interested to see how the pilot phase unfolds and whether it can live up to the initial hype and expectations.

---

Question 2: Would you recommend this news story to others?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, definitely. I think more people should know about positive environmental news like this.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely. I’ve already passed it on to several friends and colleagues, especially those who tend to feel overwhelmed by climate news. I think stories like this are crucial for maintaining public engagement with environmental issues without inducing climate fatigue.

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần thảo luận sâu nhất trong bài thi IELTS Speaking, kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi mang tính trừu tượng và phân tích cao. Đây là phần phân biệt rõ ràng nhất giữa các band điểm, đặc biệt là từ Band 7 trở lên.

Yêu cầu của Part 3:

• Phân tích vấn đề từ nhiều góc độ, không chỉ đưa ra opinion đơn thuần
• So sánh và đối chiếu các khía cạnh khác nhau
• Đánh giá critically với reasoning rõ ràng
• Đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân được support bằng examples và logic

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời thành 3-5 câu với structure rõ ràng
• Sử dụng discourse markers để organize ideas (Well, Actually, On the one hand…)
• Đưa ra examples từ society, trends, statistics – không chỉ personal experience
• Thừa nhận complexity của issues (It depends on…, There’s no simple answer…)
• Thể hiện critical thinking bằng cách present multiple perspectives

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn (1-2 câu), không elaborate đủ
• Không đưa ra reasoning rõ ràng để support opinion
• Thiếu từ vựng abstract và topic-specific terminology
• Chỉ nói về personal experience thay vì broader societal context
• Không thể discuss issues ở higher conceptual level
• Sợ disagree với examiner hoặc không dám express strong opinions

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Các câu hỏi Part 3 thường được nhóm theo themes liên quan đến topic của Part 2. Dưới đây là phân tích chi tiết các themes phổ biến.

Theme 1: Media Influence and News Consumption

---

Question 1: How has the way people consume news changed in recent years?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Change over time – So sánh past vs present
• Key words: consume news, changed, recent years
• Cách tiếp cận: Past situation → Present situation → Reasons for change → Impact/Implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

The way people get news has changed a lot because of the internet and smartphones. In the past, people read newspapers or watched TV news. Now most people check news on their phones through apps or social media. This is faster and more convenient. Young people especially prefer online news because they can access it anytime, anywhere. However, this also means people don’t read as deeply as before.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có basic comparison giữa past và present, có mention reasons
• Vocabulary: Adequate với “access”, “convenient” nhưng thiếu sophisticated terms về media
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Ideas clear nhưng chưa đủ developed, thiếu critical analysis về implications

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Well, the transformation has been absolutely dramatic, I’d say. If we cast our minds back just a decade or two, news consumption was largely passive and scheduled – people would wait for the evening news broadcast or their morning newspaper delivery. Fast forward to today, and we’re living in an era of instantaneous, on-demand news access through digital platforms.

What’s particularly striking is the shift from curated content provided by traditional gatekeepers like editors and journalists, to a more fragmented, algorithm-driven experience where individuals tailor their news feeds according to personal preferences. This has both empowering and problematic dimensions. On one hand, it democratizes information access and gives voice to marginalized perspectives that might have been filtered out by mainstream media. On the other hand, it’s facilitated the proliferation of echo chambers and misinformation, as people tend to consume content that reinforces their existing beliefs.

Another noteworthy shift is the blurring of boundaries between news and entertainment, and between professional journalism and citizen reporting. The immediacy of social media means that eyewitnesses often break stories before traditional news outlets, which has fundamentally altered the news cycle and challenged established journalistic practices.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized: Introduction với dramatic transformation → Detailed comparison (past vs present) → Analysis of positive và negative aspects → Additional insight về changing nature of journalism
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise: transformation, gatekeepers, algorithm-driven, democratizes, proliferation, echo chambers, reinforces
• Grammar: Complex structures: If we cast our minds back (inversion), relative clauses (that might have been filtered out), participle phrases (what’s particularly striking is), cleft sentences
• Critical Thinking: Shows balanced view với “both empowering and problematic dimensions”, acknowledges complexity với multiple perspectives, demonstrates deep understanding của societal implications

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, Fast forward to, On one hand/On the other hand, Another noteworthy shift
• Tentative language: I’d say, might have been, tend to – showing sophistication
• Abstract nouns: transformation, democratization, proliferation, immediacy
• Phrasal verbs: cast our minds back, filtered out, break stories

---

Question 2: Do you think traditional newspapers will disappear in the future?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Future prediction với opinion
• Key words: traditional newspapers, disappear, future
• Cách tiếp cận: Direct answer → Reasons supporting view → Acknowledge counterarguments → Nuanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I don’t think newspapers will completely disappear, but they will become less popular. Many people now prefer reading news online because it’s free and convenient. Newspapers are expensive and not good for the environment. However, some older people still like reading physical newspapers. Maybe newspapers will continue to exist but in smaller numbers. They might need to change their business model to survive.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position với some supporting points
• Vocabulary: Basic vocabulary (expensive, convenient) without sophisticated media terminology
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response với basic reasoning nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

That’s a thought-provoking question, and I think the answer is more nuanced than a simple yes or no. While I don’t believe traditional newspapers will vanish entirely, I do think they’ll need to undergo significant transformation to remain viable.

The writing is on the wall in terms of dwindling print readership and plummeting advertising revenues – these are undeniable trends that threaten the traditional newspaper business model. The convenience and immediacy of digital news, combined with the financial burden of print production and distribution, make a compelling case for digitalization. We’ve already seen numerous legacy publications either folding or pivoting to primarily digital operations.

However, I’d argue there’s still a niche market for quality print journalism. Some demographics, particularly older, more affluent readers, maintain a preference for the tangible, immersive experience of reading a physical newspaper. There’s something about the tactile nature and the ritual of reading a broadsheet that resonates with certain readers. Additionally, investigative journalism and long-form reporting – which newspapers have traditionally excelled at – still hold value and could justify a print presence, albeit a scaled-down one.

What I think is more likely is a hybrid model where newspapers exist primarily in digital form but maintain limited print editions, perhaps weekly rather than daily, catering to die-hard readers and special occasions. The key to survival will be adapting their content delivery while preserving the journalistic integrity and in-depth analysis that distinguishes them from clickbait-driven online platforms.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated organization: Nuanced introduction → Present strong trend toward decline → Acknowledge counterarguments về niche market → Present realistic conclusion với hybrid model
• Vocabulary: Advanced và precise: vanishing entirely, dwindling, plummeting, legacy publications, pivoting, niche market, tactile, die-hard readers
• Grammar: Full range: conditional implications (could justify), relative clauses (that distinguishes them from), perfect infinitives (to remain viable), complex sentences với multiple embeddings
• Critical Thinking: Exceptional depth – considers economic factors, demographic differences, value of different journalism types, proposes realistic future scenario, shows understanding của multiple stakeholders

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: While, However, Additionally, What I think is more likely
• Tentative language: I think, I’d argue, more likely is, could justify – appropriately hedging predictions
• Idiomatic expressions: The writing is on the wall, die-hard readers, making a compelling case
• Abstract nouns: transformation, viability, immediacy, integrity

Nếu bạn muốn tìm hiểu thêm về cách phát triển kỹ năng và nói về học tập mới, hãy xem Describe a skill that you would like to learn để có thêm insights về cách structure câu trả lời dạng describe.

Thảo luận chuyên sâu trong IELTS Speaking Part 3 giữa examiner và thí sinh về media và tin tức

Theme 2: Reliability and Truth in News

---

Question 3: Why do you think fake news has become such a problem?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause-Effect – Giải thích reasons
• Key words: fake news, problem, why
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge the problem → Multiple causes (technology, psychology, economics) → Interconnections → Implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Fake news is a big problem now because of social media. Anyone can post information online without checking if it’s true. People share news quickly without reading it carefully. Also, some people create fake news to get attention or make money from clicks. It’s difficult for regular people to know what’s true and what’s false.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists some reasons but lacks sophisticated analysis
• Vocabulary: Basic terms (big problem, post information, make money)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Identifies causes nhưng doesn’t explore deeper psychological hoặc societal factors

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

This is actually a multifaceted issue that stems from a convergence of technological, psychological, and economic factors. Let me break it down.

From a technological standpoint, the advent of social media has dismantled traditional gatekeeping mechanisms. In the past, information had to pass through editorial processes before reaching the public, providing at least some quality control. Now, the barriers to entry for content creation and distribution are virtually non-existent, meaning unverified or deliberately fabricated information can go viral within minutes, outpacing fact-checking efforts.

But technology alone doesn’t explain it – there’s a crucial psychological dimension. Humans have inherent cognitive biases, particularly confirmation bias, which makes us predisposed to believe information that aligns with our existing worldviews while dismissing contradictory evidence. Fake news often exploits these biases by tapping into strong emotions like fear, anger, or tribal identity. It’s packaged in a way that’s psychologically compelling, making it more shareable than nuanced, fact-based reporting.

Additionally, there’s an economic incentive structure at play. The ad-driven business model of digital platforms rewards engagement above all else, and sensational, often misleading content generates more clicks than sobering facts. This creates what economists call a “race to the bottom” where content creators are incentivized to produce increasingly inflammatory material.

Finally, we can’t ignore the erosion of trust in mainstream institutions, including traditional media, which has left a vacuum that alternative sources – some legitimate, others decidedly not – have rushed to fill. When people don’t trust established news outlets, they become more susceptible to fringe sources that may have ulterior motives.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-organized: Introduction framing it as multifaceted → Technological factors → Psychological factors → Economic factors → Social factors → Shows interconnections
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise: convergence, gatekeeping mechanisms, dismantled, predisposed, exploits, incentive structure, erosion
• Grammar: Full range: complex sentences với multiple clauses, participle phrases (making it more shareable), relative clauses (that aligns with), passive constructions for emphasis
• Critical Thinking: Outstanding depth – analyzes problem from multiple academic perspectives (technology, psychology, economics, sociology), shows understanding của systemic issues, demonstrates ability to synthesize complex factors

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: From a standpoint, But, Additionally, Finally – organizing complex argument
• Academic vocabulary: convergence, cognitive biases, incentive structure, erosion of trust
• Explanatory phrases: Let me break it down, This creates what economists call, we can’t ignore

---

Theme 3: The Role of News in Society

---

Question 4: What responsibility do journalists have to society?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion về responsibilities
• Key words: responsibility, journalists, society
• Cách tiếp cận: State main responsibilities → Elaborate each with reasoning → Acknowledge challenges → Balanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Journalists have important responsibilities. First, they must report the truth and check their facts carefully. They should be fair and not show bias toward one side. Journalists also need to protect their sources and investigate important issues that affect people’s lives. They should inform the public about what’s happening in society. This is important for democracy.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists responsibilities adequately
• Vocabulary: Functional (report the truth, check facts, show bias) nhưng lacks sophistication
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points nhưng lacks depth trong exploration của ethical dimensions và societal implications

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

I believe journalists shoulder an immense responsibility, and I’d go so far as to say they’re custodians of democracy in many ways. Let me elaborate on what I see as their paramount duties.

First and foremost, there’s the fundamental obligation to pursue truth and maintain accuracy. This goes beyond simply avoiding outright falsehoods – it involves rigorous fact-checking, verifying sources, and presenting information in proper context. In an era rife with misinformation, this baseline responsibility has become more critical than ever. Journalists must serve as a bulwark against the tide of disinformation, even when it’s politically inconvenient or commercially disadvantageous.

Equally important is the responsibility to hold power to account. Whether it’s government officials, corporations, or other influential entities, journalists serve as a crucial check on potential abuses of power. This watchdog function is enshrined in the concept of the “Fourth Estate” and is integral to functioning democracies. It requires courage, as it often means challenging powerful interests and weathering pushback or even threats.

Furthermore, journalists have a duty to amplify marginalized voices and shed light on issues that might otherwise remain hidden from public view. This involves proactive reporting that doesn’t just cater to mainstream interests but actively seeks out underrepresented perspectives. It’s about using their platform to foster inclusive dialogue and ensure that public discourse reflects society’s full diversity.

However, I should acknowledge that these responsibilities must be balanced against practical constraints – editorial pressures, financial viability, and personal safety, among others. The ideals of journalism sometimes collide with messy realities, and there’s ongoing debate about how to navigate these tensions. That said, upholding core ethical principles should remain non-negotiable, even when it’s challenging.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated organization: Strong opening statement → First responsibility (truth) elaborated với contemporary context → Second responsibility (accountability) với democratic theory → Third responsibility (inclusivity) → Acknowledgment of challenges → Firm conclusion
• Vocabulary: Exceptional range: shoulder responsibility, custodians, paramount, rife with, bulwark against, enshrined, watchdog function, amplify marginalized voices
• Grammar: Full mastery: conditional clauses (even when it’s politically inconvenient), complex noun phrases (the tide of disinformation), perfect infinitives, various clause types seamlessly integrated
• Critical Thinking: Outstanding – references democratic theory (Fourth Estate), acknowledges complexity và competing demands, shows understanding của ethical frameworks, demonstrates nuanced view của real-world constraints

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: First and foremost, Equally important, Furthermore, However, That said
• Tentative language: I believe, I’d go so far as to say, might otherwise remain
• Abstract nouns: obligation, accuracy, accountability, inclusivity, discourse, tensions
• Metaphorical language: shoulder responsibility, bulwark against, tide of, watchdog function

---

Question 5: How might news reporting change in the next 20 years?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Future prediction với speculation
• Key words: might, change, next 20 years
• Cách tiếp cận: Current trends → Technological predictions → Social/behavioral changes → Potential challenges → Concluding thoughts

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think news reporting will become more digital and use more technology. Artificial intelligence might help create news stories faster. People will probably watch more video news instead of reading articles. Virtual reality could make news more interactive and interesting. Traditional TV news might become less popular. Social media will continue to be important for sharing news.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists predictions adequately
• Vocabulary: Functional (become more digital, use more technology) without sophisticated future speculation language
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Makes reasonable predictions nhưng lacks sophisticated analysis của implications và interconnected factors

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Well, predicting the future is always fraught with uncertainty, but based on current trajectories, I can envision several transformative changes.

I suspect we’ll see AI play an increasingly prominent role, though perhaps not in the way people imagine. Rather than AI replacing journalists entirely, I think we’ll see more collaborative models where AI handles routine data processing and pattern recognition, freeing up human journalists to focus on investigative work, analysis, and storytelling that requires emotional intelligence and ethical judgment. We’re already seeing early iterations of this with automated financial reporting and sports coverage.

The immersive technologies you mentioned – VR and AR – will likely evolve from novelty to mainstream tools for news delivery. Imagine being able to virtually transport yourself to the scene of a news event or visualize complex data sets in three dimensions. This could revolutionize how we understand global issues, making distant events feel more immediate and visceral. However, there’s also a risk that sensationalism could intensify, so regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines will need to keep pace.

I also foresee a bifurcation in the news landscape. On one hand, we’ll likely see the consolidation of premium, subscription-based journalism that caters to audiences willing to pay for in-depth, quality reporting. On the other, we’ll have an ever-expanding ocean of free, algorithm-driven content of variable quality. This two-tier system could exacerbate existing information inequalities, where access to reliable news becomes increasingly tied to socioeconomic status.

Crucially, I think we’ll see a reckoning regarding trust and verification. The proliferation of deepfakes and sophisticated disinformation will likely necessitate new verification technologies and perhaps even blockchain-based systems for authenticating content. News organizations might need to become more transparent about their processes, essentially “showing their work” to rebuild audience trust.

Finally, I believe there’ll be a renewed emphasis on hyper-local news as a counterbalance to globalized media. Communities are recognizing that local issues directly affecting their lives often get drowned out by national and international headlines. We might see new grassroots models of community journalism emerging, possibly funded through innovative cooperative structures.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally sophisticated: Caveat about prediction uncertainty → AI and automation với nuanced view → Immersive tech với opportunities và risks → Economic models và inequality → Trust và verification issues → Local journalism trend → Shows deep understanding của interconnected factors
• Vocabulary: Advanced và precise: trajectories, envision, transformative, bifurcation, exacerbate, reckoning, proliferation, hyper-local, counterbalance
• Grammar: Full range: complex conditionals, future forms with varying certainty (I suspect, will likely, I foresee), participle clauses (freeing up human journalists), relative clauses, passive constructions
• Critical Thinking: Exceptional – considers technological, economic, social, và ethical dimensions; acknowledges both opportunities và risks; predicts systemic changes; demonstrates understanding của complex interdependencies; shows awareness của unintended consequences

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Rather than, However, I also foresee, Crucially, Finally – organizing complex predictions
• Hedging language: I suspect, will likely, I think, might need to, possibly – appropriate tentativeness về predictions
• Future forms variety: will see, will likely evolve, I foresee, we’ll see – showing grammatical range
• Abstract nouns: trajectories, iterations, bifurcation, consolidation, proliferation, reckoning

Để hiểu thêm về cách nói về các chủ đề văn hóa và địa điểm, bạn có thể tham khảo describe a tourist attraction that is popular in your country – nơi bạn sẽ thấy những kỹ thuật tương tự để mô tả và phân tích các chủ đề khác nhau.

Theme 4: Cross-Cultural News Perspectives

---

Question 6: Do you think people from different countries perceive the same news story differently?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion với comparison và analysis
• Key words: different countries, perceive, same news, differently
• Cách tiếp cận: Direct answer → Factors influencing perception (cultural, political, media) → Examples → Implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think people from different countries see news differently. This is because they have different cultures and values. For example, a news story about the environment might be very important in some countries but less important in others. Also, different countries have different media systems, so they might report the same story in different ways. People’s own experiences and backgrounds also affect how they understand news.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position với basic supporting points
• Vocabulary: Adequate (cultures, values, media systems) nhưng lacks sophisticated analytical terms
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Makes valid points nhưng doesn’t explore deeply enough the mechanisms và implications

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Absolutely, and I’d argue this divergence in perception is not only inevitable but also quite profound. The lens through which people view news is heavily shaped by a constellation of cultural, historical, and political factors.

To start with, there’s the cultural framework that underpins how people interpret events. Values that are deeply ingrained in one culture – say, individualism versus collectivism, or attitudes toward authority – fundamentally color how news is received. Take something like government intervention in the economy: this might be viewed as necessary stewardship in some societies but as unacceptable overreach in others. These aren’t just different opinions; they’re worldviews rooted in distinct cultural trajectories.

Then there’s the historical context that people bring to news stories. Events don’t exist in a vacuum – they’re situated within ongoing narratives that vary by nation and region. For instance, news about military alliances or trade agreements will resonate very differently in countries with contrasting historical experiences of colonialism, conflict, or economic development. What looks like opportunity to one nation might conjure up memories of exploitation in another.

We also can’t overlook the role of media ecosystems, which vary dramatically across borders. Some countries have diverse, pluralistic media landscapes with multiple competing perspectives, while others have more centralized or state-controlled systems that present filtered or curated versions of events. The framing of a story – which details are emphasized, which voices are amplified, which context is provided – can dramatically alter perception.

Furthermore, there’s the linguistic dimension. News that’s translated inevitably loses some nuance, and certain concepts simply don’t have equivalents across languages, leading to potential misinterpretation. Idioms, cultural references, and even humor don’t always translate smoothly.

What makes this particularly consequential in our interconnected world is that these divergent perceptions can lead to miscommunication and even conflict between nations. When countries operating from different interpretive frameworks engage on global issues – climate change, trade, security – these perceptual gaps can hinder cooperation. On the flip side, recognizing and respecting these differences can foster more nuanced cross-cultural dialogue and help us avoid the trap of cultural myopia.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated và comprehensive: Strong affirmative answer → Cultural factors elaborated với examples → Historical context với specific scenarios → Media systems comparison → Linguistic dimension → Broader implications for international relations → Shows exceptional organizational skill
• Vocabulary: Exceptionally sophisticated: divergence, constellation, underpins, ingrained, stewardship, trajectories, resonate, pluralistic, framing, amplified, nuance, myopia
• Grammar: Full mastery: complex noun phrases (the lens through which people view), various clause types, inversion for emphasis (What makes this particularly consequential), passive voice for appropriate emphasis
• Critical Thinking: Outstanding – analyzes from multiple academic perspectives (anthropology, history, media studies, linguistics), considers both micro and macro implications, demonstrates understanding của global dynamics, shows awareness của both problems và potential solutions, exceptional depth of analysis

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: To start with, Then, Furthermore, On the flip side – sophisticated organization
• Academic register: constellation of factors, situated within, media ecosystems, interpretive frameworks
• Metaphorical language: lens through which, color how news is received, operating from different frameworks
• Hedging và certainty: I’d argue, might be viewed, inevitably, simply don’t – appropriate modulation

Nếu bạn quan tâm đến việc học ngôn ngữ và văn hóa, describe a language you would like to learn and why cũng cung cấp những insights về cách tiếp cận các chủ đề cultural differences một cách sâu sắc.

Bảng phân tích chi tiết band điểm IELTS Speaking với tiêu chí chấm và ví dụ cụ thể

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
breaking news	n	/ˈbreɪkɪŋ njuːz/	tin nóng hổi, tin mới nhất	The channel interrupted regular programming to report breaking news.	breaking news story, breaking news alert, cover breaking news
headline	n	/ˈhedlaɪn/	tiêu đề (tin tức)	The scandal made headlines across the country.	front-page headline, grab headlines, hit the headlines, make headlines
coverage	n	/ˈkʌvərɪdʒ/	sự đưa tin, phạm vi đưa tin	The media coverage of the election was extensive.	news coverage, media coverage, extensive coverage, balanced coverage
journalism	n	/ˈdʒɜːnəlɪzəm/	nghề báo chí	Investigative journalism plays a vital role in democracy.	investigative journalism, citizen journalism, quality journalism, objective journalism
misinformation	n	/ˌmɪsɪnfəˈmeɪʃən/	thông tin sai lệch (không cố ý)	Social media has accelerated the spread of misinformation.	spread misinformation, combat misinformation, prevalence of misinformation
disinformation	n	/ˌdɪsɪnfəˈmeɪʃən/	thông tin giả mạo (cố ý)	Foreign actors spread disinformation to influence elections.	deliberate disinformation, disinformation campaign, counter disinformation
sensationalism	n	/senˈseɪʃənəlɪzəm/	chủ nghĩa giật gân, phóng đại	The tabloid was criticized for its sensationalism.	media sensationalism, resort to sensationalism, avoid sensationalism
unprecedented	adj	/ʌnˈpresɪdentɪd/	chưa từng có tiền lệ	The pandemic created unprecedented challenges.	unprecedented scale, unprecedented crisis, unprecedented opportunity
compelling	adj	/kəmˈpelɪŋ/	hấp dẫn, thuyết phục	The documentary presented a compelling argument.	compelling evidence, compelling story, compelling reason
groundbreaking	adj	/ˈɡraʊndbreɪkɪŋ/	đột phá, mang tính cách mạng	The research led to groundbreaking discoveries.	groundbreaking research, groundbreaking technology, groundbreaking work
resonate with	v	/ˈrezəneɪt wɪð/	gây tiếng vang với, chạm đến	The story resonated with millions of viewers.	deeply resonate, strongly resonate, particularly resonate
disseminate	v	/dɪˈsemɪneɪt/	phổ biến, truyền bá (thông tin)	News organizations disseminate information to the public.	widely disseminate, rapidly disseminate, effectively disseminate
verify	v	/ˈverɪfaɪ/	xác minh, kiểm chứng	Journalists must verify facts before publishing.	independently verify, carefully verify, verify information/sources
bias	n	/ˈbaɪəs/	thiên vị, thành kiến	Reporters should avoid bias in their coverage.	media bias, political bias, unconscious bias, show bias
objective	adj	/əbˈdʒektɪv/	khách quan	Good journalism strives to be objective.	remain objective, objective reporting, objective analysis
credible	adj	/ˈkredəbl/	đáng tin cậy	Always check if news sources are credible.	highly credible, credible source, credible evidence
scrutiny	n	/ˈskruːtəni/	sự giám sát chặt chẽ	Public figures are under constant media scrutiny.	intense scrutiny, public scrutiny, come under scrutiny
accountability	n	/əˌkaʊntəˈbɪləti/	trách nhiệm giải trình	Journalism holds powerful institutions to account.	public accountability, ensure accountability, lack of accountability

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
catch up on	cập nhật thông tin về cái gì	I need to catch up on the latest news this weekend.	7-8
keep tabs on	theo dõi sát sao	I keep tabs on technological developments through various news sources.	7.5-8.5
stay informed	giữ mình được cập nhật thông tin	It’s important to stay informed about current events.	7-8
the tip of the iceberg	phần nổi của tảng băng (chỉ là một phần nhỏ)	The scandal we see is just the tip of the iceberg.	8-9
come to light	được tiết lộ, lộ ra	New evidence has come to light about the incident.	7.5-8.5
hit the headlines	trở thành tin tức nóng	The story hit the headlines within hours of breaking.	7-8
make waves	gây chú ý, tạo ảnh hưởng lớn	The investigative report made waves in political circles.	8-9
go viral	lan truyền nhanh chóng (trên mạng)	The video went viral, reaching millions within days.	7-8
echo chamber	buồng vang (môi trường chỉ nghe ý kiến giống mình)	Social media can create echo chambers where people only hear views they agree with.	8.5-9
take with a grain of salt	không tin hoàn toàn, cần hoài nghi	You should take social media news with a grain of salt.	7.5-8.5
the writing is on the wall	dấu hiệu rõ ràng về điều sắp xảy ra	The writing is on the wall for traditional print newspapers.	8-9
turn a blind eye to	làm ngơ, phớt lờ	Some media outlets turn a blind eye to certain issues.	7.5-8.5

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Dùng khi cần một chút thời gian suy nghĩ
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi muốn đưa ra góc nhìn bất ngờ hoặc contradict expectation
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi muốn nói thẳng thắn, chân thành
• 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân một cách tự tin nhưng không quá assertive
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Nhấn mạnh đây là quan điểm cá nhân

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, hơn nữa
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa (formal hơn)
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
• 📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó (formal)
• 📝 Furthermore,… – Hơn thế nữa (academic)

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét
• 📝 That said,… – Tuy nhiên, dù vậy thì
• 📝 Having said that,… – Sau khi nói điều đó thì
• 📝 By the same token,… – Tương tự như vậy

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, xét cho cùng
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, khi tính toán hết mọi thứ
• 📝 All things considered,… – Khi xem xét mọi khía cạnh
• 📝 In the final analysis,… – Khi phân tích cuối cùng (formal)

Để elaborate và clarify:

• 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là
• 📝 To put it another way,… – Nói cách khác
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác
• 📝 Let me elaborate… – Để tôi giải thích rõ hơn
• 📝 To break it down,… – Để phân tích chi tiết

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional:

• Formula: If + past perfect, would/could + base verb (mixing time frames)
• Ví dụ: “If journalists hadn’t investigated the story, this corruption would still be happening today.”

Inversion for emphasis:

• Formula: Had + subject + past participle, would have…
• Ví dụ: “Had the media not exposed the scandal, the public would never have known the truth.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

• Formula: , which/who + clause,
• Ví dụ: “The news story, which went viral within hours, highlighted critical environmental issues.”

Reduced relative clauses:

• Formula: Noun + participle phrase
• Ví dụ: “Stories covering social injustice tend to resonate more with younger audiences.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive với reporting verbs:

• It is thought/believed/said/reported that…
• Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that traditional newspapers will decline in the coming decade.”

Passive với modal verbs:

• Formula: Modal + be + past participle
• Ví dụ: “Fake news should be identified and removed from social platforms promptly.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What-cleft (nhấn mạnh object):

• Formula: What + subject + verb + is/was…
• Ví dụ: “What really captivated me about the story was its human-interest angle.”

It-cleft (nhấn mạnh subject/time/place):

• Formula: It + be + emphasized element + that/who…
• Ví dụ: “It was the investigative journalism that exposed the corporate fraud.”

5. Inversion Structures:

Not only… but also:

• Formula: Not only + auxiliary + subject + verb, but also…
• Ví dụ: “Not only does sensationalism attract readers, but it also undermines journalistic integrity.”

Seldom/Rarely at the beginning:

• Formula: Seldom/Rarely + auxiliary + subject + verb
• Ví dụ: “Rarely do we see such balanced coverage of controversial issues in mainstream media.”

6. Participle Clauses:

Present participle (showing simultaneous action or reason):

• Ví dụ: “Recognizing the importance of credible sources, I always verify information before sharing.”

Past participle (showing passive meaning):

• Ví dụ: “Faced with declining readership, many newspapers have shifted to digital platforms.”

7. Noun Clauses as Subjects:

Formula: What/That + clause + verb

• Ví dụ: “What strikes me most about modern journalism is its struggle with objectivity.”
• Ví dụ: “That misinformation spreads so rapidly is deeply concerning.”

Những cấu trúc ngữ pháp này không chỉ giúp bạn đạt band điểm cao mà còn làm cho câu nói của bạn tự nhiên và sophisticated hơn. Hãy luyện tập sử dụng chúng trong context thực tế thay vì học thuộc lòng.

---

Việc nắm vững chủ đề “Describe a recent news story that interested you” không chỉ giúp bạn tự tin trong phòng thi IELTS Speaking mà còn phản ánh khả năng critical thinking và engagement với thế giới xung quanh. Hãy nhớ rằng, examiner không đánh giá bạn dựa trên việc bạn biết tin tức gì, mà dựa trên cách bạn diễn đạt, phân tích và thể hiện suy nghĩ về nó.

Những điểm quan trọng cần ghi nhớ:

• Chọn tin tức bạn thực sự quan tâm, không cần phải là tin quốc tế to lớn
• Tập trung vào phần “explain” để thể hiện depth of thinking
• Sử dụng đa dạng vocabulary và structures, nhưng phải tự nhiên
• Thực hành với nhiều loại tin tức khác nhau (khoa học, môi trường, xã hội, công nghệ)
• Phát triển habit đọc tin tức bằng tiếng Anh hàng ngày

Chúc bạn thành công với kỳ thi IELTS Speaking sắp tới!