IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe a Situation When You Had to Deal With a Problem” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Mở bài

Chủ đề “Describe A Situation When You Had To Deal With A Problem” là một trong những dạng đề thi phổ biến nhất trong IELTS Speaking Part 2, xuất hiện thường xuyên trong các kỳ thi từ năm 2020 đến nay. Đây là chủ đề thuộc nhóm “Past Experience” và thường được examiner ưa chuộng vì nó cho phép đánh giá khả năng kể chuyện, sử dụng thì quá khứ, và thể hiện kỹ năng giải quyết vấn đề của thí sinh.

Theo thống kê từ các trung tâm thi IELTS chính thức và các diễn đàn chia sẻ đề thi thực tế như IELTS-Blog.com, chủ đề này xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong quý I và quý III hàng năm. Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong các kỳ thi sắp tới ở mức độ cao, đặc biệt là các biến thể như “describe a difficult situation you faced”, “describe a time when you solved a problem creatively”, hay “describe a challenge you overcame”.

Qua bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được các câu hỏi thường gặp trong cả 3 Part của bài thi nói, bài mẫu chi tiết theo nhiều band điểm từ 6-7, 7.5-8 đến 8.5-9, kho từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm, chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của một examiner chính thức, cùng những lời khuyên thiết thực giúp bạn tự tin đối mặt với chủ đề này.

---

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về đời sống hàng ngày, sở thích cá nhân và những chủ đề quen thuộc. Đặc điểm của phần này là câu hỏi đơn giản, yêu cầu trả lời tự nhiên và mở rộng ý trong 2-3 câu. Chiến lược hiệu quả là trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, sau đó bổ sung lý do hoặc ví dụ cụ thể để tạo độ dài phù hợp.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 1 bao gồm trả lời quá ngắn gọn chỉ với Yes/No hoặc một câu đơn, sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản lặp đi lặp lại, thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân, và không biết cách tự nhiên mở rộng câu trả lời mà không nghe như đang đọc thuộc lòng.

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you consider yourself a good problem solver?

Question 2: What kind of problems do you usually face in your daily life?

Question 3: How do you typically react when you encounter a problem?

Question 4: Do you prefer to solve problems on your own or ask others for help?

Question 5: Have you ever helped someone else solve a problem?

Question 6: What was the last problem you had to deal with?

Question 7: Are you good at staying calm under pressure?

Question 8: Do you think problem-solving skills can be learned or are they natural?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

---

Question: Do you consider yourself a good problem solver?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có/không hoặc ở mức độ nào
• Đưa ra lý do hoặc ví dụ minh họa
• Thêm chi tiết về phong cách giải quyết vấn đề của bạn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think I’m quite good at solving problems. I usually stay calm and try to think of different solutions. For example, when I have problems with my computer, I search online for answers and usually fix it myself.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, có ví dụ cụ thể về computer problem, sử dụng cấu trúc câu đơn giản rõ ràng.
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng cơ bản (good, problems, fix), thiếu variety trong grammar structures, ví dụ chưa impressive.
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Fluency acceptable nhưng thiếu flexibility, vocabulary adequate nhưng không sophisticated, grammar đơn giản với mostly simple sentences.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’d say I’m reasonably adept at problem-solving, particularly when it comes to logical challenges. I tend to approach issues methodically, breaking them down into manageable components rather than feeling overwhelmed. For instance, when I recently encountered a software glitch at work, instead of panicking, I systematically troubleshooted each possible cause until I identified the root issue.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng tentative language (I’d say, reasonably) để nghe tự nhiên hơn, vocabulary chính xác và sophisticated (adept at, methodically, manageable components, systematically troubleshooted), grammar đa dạng với complex sentences và relative clauses, ví dụ cụ thể và professional.
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates excellent fluency với natural hesitation device, lexical resource precise và idiomatic, grammatical structures varied và accurate, pronunciation với appropriate stress và intonation, ideas well-developed với clear reasoning.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• reasonably adept at: khá giỏi về, có năng lực tốt
• logical challenges: những thách thức mang tính logic
• approach issues methodically: tiếp cận vấn đề một cách có phương pháp
• manageable components: những thành phần có thể kiểm soát được
• systematically troubleshoot: khắc phục sự cố một cách có hệ thống

---

Question: What kind of problems do you usually face in your daily life?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đề cập đến 1-2 loại vấn đề phổ biến
• Giải thích tại sao những vấn đề này thường xuyên xảy ra
• Có thể thêm cảm nhận cá nhân về chúng

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I usually face problems with time management because I have many things to do. Sometimes I also have problems with public transport when the bus is late. These are small problems but they happen quite often in my daily routine.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Liệt kê được 2 loại problems cụ thể, có giải thích ngắn gọn.
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary repetitive (problems xuất hiện 3 lần), thiếu collocations, grammar structures đơn giản, lack of sophistication.
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates main ideas nhưng thiếu depth, vocabulary sufficient nhưng không varied, grammar mainly simple với few attempts at complexity.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

The everyday challenges I encounter are typically time-related pressures, especially juggling multiple commitments between work and personal life. I often find myself struggling to strike a balance between meeting deadlines and maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Another recurring issue is dealing with unexpected disruptions to my commute, which can throw my entire schedule off track. Though these seem like minor inconveniences, they do require constant adaptation and quick thinking.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary sophisticated và varied (everyday challenges, time-related pressures, juggling multiple commitments, strike a balance, recurring issue), grammar complex với participial phrases và relative clauses, ideas well-structured từ general đến specific, shows reflection với “though these seem like…”.
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Excellent lexical range với precise word choice, complex grammar used naturally, fluent delivery với good coherence markers, demonstrates ability to discuss abstract concepts.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• time-related pressures: áp lực liên quan đến thời gian
• juggling multiple commitments: xoay xở nhiều cam kết cùng lúc
• strike a balance: tạo sự cân bằng
• recurring issue: vấn đề tái diễn, lặp lại
• throw my entire schedule off track: làm đảo lộn toàn bộ lịch trình
• minor inconveniences: những bất tiện nhỏ
• constant adaptation: sự thích nghi liên tục

---

Question: How do you typically react when you encounter a problem?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Mô tả phản ứng ban đầu (cảm xúc/hành động)
• Giải thích quy trình xử lý vấn đề
• Có thể so sánh với cách mình phản ứng trước đây

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

When I have a problem, I try to stay calm first. Then I think about what I can do to solve it. If it’s difficult, I will ask my friends or family for advice. I think staying calm is the most important thing.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Structure logic với first, then, if, có đề cập đến emotional response và action steps.
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary basic (have a problem, stay calm, difficult), thiếu specific examples, grammar simple với mostly present simple.
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate communication nhưng lacks sophistication, vocabulary functional nhưng limited range, grammar adequate với some variety.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

My initial response is usually to take a step back and assess the situation objectively rather than reacting impulsively. I’ve learned over the years that knee-jerk reactions rarely lead to effective solutions. Once I’ve gained perspective, I weigh up the potential options and prioritize them based on feasibility and impact. If it’s something beyond my expertise, I’m not hesitant to reach out to more knowledgeable people – I believe there’s no shame in seeking guidance when needed. This approach has served me well in both personal and professional contexts.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Sophisticated vocabulary (initial response, assess objectively, reacting impulsively, knee-jerk reactions, gained perspective, weigh up options, feasibility), complex grammar với conditionals và relative clauses, shows maturity và reflection (I’ve learned over the years), includes personal philosophy (no shame in seeking guidance), well-developed ideas với clear progression.
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates excellent control of language, idiomatic expressions used naturally, complex ideas expressed clearly, shows critical thinking và self-awareness.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• initial response: phản ứng ban đầu
• assess the situation objectively: đánh giá tình huống một cách khách quan
• reacting impulsively: phản ứng bốc đồng
• knee-jerk reactions: phản ứng phản xạ, không suy nghĩ
• gained perspective: có được góc nhìn, tầm nhìn
• weigh up the potential options: cân nhắc các lựa chọn tiềm năng
• beyond my expertise: ngoài khả năng chuyên môn của tôi
• served me well: đã giúp ích cho tôi

Cách phản ứng và giải quyết vấn đề hiệu quả trong IELTS Speaking về chủ đề dealing with problems

---

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài tổng cộng 3-4 phút, bao gồm 1 phút chuẩn bị và 2-3 phút nói liên tục không bị gián đoạn. Đây là phần độc thoại yêu cầu thí sinh kể chi tiết về một chủ đề cụ thể được đưa ra trên cue card. Đặc điểm quan trọng là bạn phải nói một mình trong khoảng thời gian này, examiner sẽ không ngắt lời trừ khi bạn nói quá 3 phút.

Chiến lược hiệu quả là sử dụng đầy đủ 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi chú keywords (không viết câu hoàn chỉnh), đảm bảo nói đủ tối thiểu 1.5-2 phút để tránh bị mất điểm, trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trên thẻ câu hỏi, và sử dụng thì quá khứ chính xác khi kể về sự kiện đã qua.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam bao gồm không tận dụng hết thời gian chuẩn bị dẫn đến bối rối khi nói, nói dưới 1.5 phút do thiếu ý tưởng mở rộng, bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points quan trọng, và sử dụng sai thì động từ khi kể chuyện trong quá khứ.

Cue Card

Describe a situation when you had to deal with a problem

You should say:

• What the problem was
• When and where it happened
• How you dealt with it
• And explain how you felt about this experience

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe a situation/experience – thuộc nhóm Past Event, yêu cầu kể về một tình huống cụ thể trong quá khứ.

Thì động từ: Past tenses (Past Simple, Past Continuous, Past Perfect) phải được sử dụng chính xác xuyên suốt bài nói vì đây là sự kiện đã xảy ra.

Bullet points phải cover:

• What the problem was: Mô tả rõ ràng vấn đề gì, mức độ nghiêm trọng, tại sao nó là vấn đề
• When and where it happened: Context cụ thể về thời gian và địa điểm, có thể thêm background information
• How you dealt with it: Các bước hành động cụ thể, quy trình giải quyết, ai tham gia
• And explain how you felt: Đây là phần quan trọng nhất, cần mở rộng về cảm xúc, suy nghĩ, bài học rút ra

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần “explain how you felt” thường chiếm 30-40% thời lượng bài nói và là cơ hội để bạn thể hiện vocabulary về emotions, reflections, và insights. Đây là điểm phân biệt giữa band 7 và band 8+. Tương tự như describe a challenging situation you faced while learning something new, bạn cần thể hiện khả năng phân tích sâu về trải nghiệm cá nhân.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about a problem I had last year when I was preparing for my university entrance exam. The problem was that I couldn’t understand mathematics, especially calculus, which was very difficult for me.

This happened when I was in my final year of high school, around May or June. I was studying at home and at my school. The exam was coming soon, so I was very worried because mathematics was an important subject.

The problem was serious because if I failed mathematics, I couldn’t get into a good university. I tried many ways to solve this problem. First, I studied harder and spent more time on mathematics. I did many practice exercises every day. Then, I asked my teacher for extra help after school. My teacher was very kind and explained the difficult parts to me again. I also joined a study group with my friends, and we helped each other with difficult questions.

After a few weeks, I started to understand mathematics better. I felt much better and more confident. When I finally passed the exam with a good grade, I was very happy and relieved. This experience taught me that if you work hard and ask for help when you need it, you can solve most problems. I also learned that it’s important not to give up when things are difficult.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có sử dụng linking devices (first, then, after) nhưng còn đơn giản, ideas được present logic nhưng thiếu sophistication, có một số hesitation nhẹ
Lexical Resource	6-7	Vocabulary adequate cho topic (entrance exam, calculus, practice exercises, study group), một số collocations tốt (final year, extra help) nhưng còn repetitive (problem xuất hiện nhiều lần, difficult lặp lại), thiếu less common vocabulary
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Mix of simple và complex sentences, sử dụng past tenses chính xác, có attempts với conditionals (if I failed), một số errors nhỏ không ảnh hưởng communication
Pronunciation	6-7	Generally clear và intelligible, word stress và sentence stress chính xác, intonation natural nhưng có thể improved

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points trên cue card
• ✅ Có structure rõ ràng với introduction, main points, và conclusion
• ✅ Sử dụng past tenses chính xác và consistent
• ✅ Đưa ra specific example về study group và teacher’s help

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary còn basic và repetitive, thiếu variety
• ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đủ complex và varied
• ⚠️ Thiếu descriptive details để tạo vividness
• ⚠️ Phần feelings chưa được elaborate đầy đủ

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to describe a challenging situation I encountered last year that really put my problem-solving skills to the test. The issue involved organizing a charity event for my university, which suddenly faced a major setback just days before it was scheduled to take place.

This happened in October last year when I was serving as the event coordinator for a fundraising campaign aimed at supporting underprivileged children in rural areas. We had been planning this event for months, securing sponsors, booking venues, and coordinating with volunteers. Everything seemed to be falling into place until our main sponsor unexpectedly pulled out three days before the event, leaving us with a significant budget shortfall.

I have to admit, my initial reaction was panic. We had already committed to various expenses and had promoted the event extensively through social media. However, I quickly realized that dwelling on the problem wouldn’t help. I took a systematic approach to addressing the crisis. First, I convened an emergency meeting with the organizing committee to brainstorm alternative solutions. We decided to reach out to local businesses for last-minute sponsorship and simultaneously launched a crowdfunding campaign online. I personally contacted around twenty potential sponsors, explaining our situation and the worthy cause we were supporting.

The response was surprisingly positive. Several small businesses agreed to contribute, and our crowdfunding campaign gained unexpected momentum through social media sharing. We managed to raise sufficient funds to proceed with the event, though on a slightly scaled-down version.

Looking back on this experience, I felt an overwhelming sense of relief and accomplishment when we successfully pulled off the event. It was incredibly rewarding to see how the community rallied together to support our cause. This situation taught me that problems, no matter how daunting they initially seem, can be overcome with quick thinking, effective communication, and collaborative effort. It also reinforced my belief that transparency and honesty when seeking help can generate genuine support from others.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Flows naturally với minimal hesitation, excellent use of discourse markers (however, looking back, simultaneously), ideas well-organized và coherently linked, appropriate length với good pacing
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range của vocabulary (setback, coordinator, underprivileged, shortfall, dwelling on, convened, brainstorm, momentum), good use of collocations (pulled out, fell into place, rallied together), some sophisticated phrases (put my problem-solving skills to the test), occasional less common vocabulary
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Wide range của structures including relative clauses, participial phrases, conditionals, complex sentences well-formed, mostly error-free, good control của past tenses including past perfect
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear articulation, natural stress và rhythm, good intonation patterns, easily understood throughout

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“problem”, “difficult”, “very worried”	“challenging situation”, “major setback”, “initial reaction was panic”, “overwhelming sense of relief”
Grammar	“I tried many ways” (simple past)	“We managed to raise sufficient funds to proceed” (complex structure với infinitive)
Ideas	Basic description của problem và solution	Detailed context, specific actions, reflection on lessons learned
Collocations	“study harder”, “passed the exam”	“put skills to the test”, “pulled out”, “gained momentum”, “rallied together”

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to recount a particularly formidable challenge I faced approximately eighteen months ago, which truly tested not only my problem-solving abilities but also my resilience under pressure. The predicament involved a critical system failure at my workplace that threatened to derail an important project with far-reaching implications for our organization.

At the time, I was working as a junior project manager at a tech startup specializing in educational software. We were on the verge of launching a new learning platform that had been in development for over a year, with several major educational institutions eagerly awaiting its release. The launch was scheduled for a Monday morning, and we had spent the preceding weekend conducting final quality assurance checks. However, on Sunday evening, around 9 PM, our lead developer discovered a catastrophic bug in the system that rendered the entire platform inoperable. What made this particularly nerve-wracking was that the issue stemmed from a recent security patch we had implemented, which had inadvertently created a cascade of compatibility issues.

My knee-jerk reaction was, I’ll be honest, one of sheer panic. We had stakeholders flying in from different cities for the launch event, press releases had been distributed, and there were contractual obligations we needed to meet. However, I quickly recognized that succumbing to anxiety would be counterproductive. I took a deep breath and shifted into crisis management mode.

The first thing I did was assemble our core technical team for an emergency virtual meeting, despite it being late on a Sunday evening. I laid out the situation candidly, without sugarcoating the severity, and we collectively assessed whether postponement was inevitable. Our senior developer suggested that the bug might be isolated to specific modules, and if we could identify and quarantine the affected components, we might be able to launch with limited functionality while we worked on a comprehensive fix.

I then made what I consider to be the most crucial decision of the entire ordeal – I immediately contacted our key stakeholders to inform them of the situation transparently. Rather than attempting to sweep the issue under the rug or stall for time, I explained the technical challenges we were facing, the potential risks of proceeding with the launch, and the alternative solutions we were exploring. I proposed a revised launch strategy where we would release the core features as planned but clearly communicate that additional modules would be rolled out progressively over the following weeks.

The response from our stakeholders was, much to my relief, overwhelmingly supportive. They appreciated the transparency and the proactive approach to problem-solving. Meanwhile, our technical team worked round the clock through the night. By 6 AM Monday, they had successfully isolated the problematic code and deployed a stable version with about 85% of the planned functionality intact.

The launch proceeded as scheduled, albeit with some minor modifications to our presentation and demonstrations. We were upfront with attendees about the situation, which actually garnered respect for our commitment to quality and honesty rather than undermining confidence in our product.

Reflecting on this experience, I experienced a complex mixture of emotions. Initially, there was the acute stress and apprehension about potential failure. However, as we navigated through the crisis, I felt a growing sense of confidence in our team’s capabilities. When we successfully executed the launch, the feeling was nothing short of euphoric – a profound sense of accomplishment that came not just from averting disaster but from the way we had handled it collectively and ethically.

This situation was genuinely transformative for me professionally and personally. It reinforced several critical lessons: firstly, that transparency and honest communication, even when delivering bad news, builds trust rather than erodes it. Secondly, I learned that the most effective problem-solving happens when you can maintain composure and think strategically rather than react emotionally. Finally, it underscored the importance of having a reliable, skilled team – no individual, regardless of their capabilities, can tackle complex challenges in isolation. The experience also taught me to embrace problems as opportunities for growth rather than viewing them as insurmountable obstacles. In many ways, that harrowing Sunday evening became one of the most defining moments of my early career.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Speaks fluently với apenas perceptible hesitation, sophisticated use của cohesive devices (however, meanwhile, reflecting on, firstly, finally), ideas superbly organized với clear progression, natural delivery như native/proficient speaker
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Sophisticated và precise vocabulary (formidable, predicament, inadvertently, cascade, counterproductive, quarantine, sweep under the rug, garnered respect), extensive use của less common expressions, idiomatic language used naturally, skillful use của collocations (far-reaching implications, on the verge of, round the clock, averting disaster)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range của structures với full flexibility và accuracy, complex sentences constructed effortlessly, variety của tenses used accurately, sophisticated use của participles và conditionals, virtually error-free
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Pronunciation features barely affect ease of understanding, uses full range của pronunciation features với precision, effortless use of intonation, stress, và rhythm

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói này demonstrates near-native fluency với minimal hesitation chỉ ở những điểm tự nhiên cho phép người nghe absorb information. The speaker sử dụng natural fillers như “I’ll be honest” và “much to my relief” để maintain conversational tone while organizing thoughts. Các transition phrases như “reflecting on this experience” và “looking back” được sử dụng sophisticatedly để shift perspectives.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:
Ví dụ: “catastrophic bug” thay vì chỉ “big problem” – từ “catastrophic” cho thấy severity với academic tone, “bug” là technical terminology appropriate cho context. “Inadvertently created a cascade of compatibility issues” – cụm này demonstrates precision trong describing technical problems với metaphorical language (cascade) và formal vocabulary (inadvertently, compatibility). “Succumbing to anxiety” thay vì “feeling worried” shows sophisticated verb choice với formal register.

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:
Ví dụ: “What made this particularly nerve-wracking was that the issue stemmed from a recent security patch we had implemented, which had inadvertently created a cascade of compatibility issues.” – Câu này combines cleft sentence structure (What made this…was that), past perfect (had implemented, had created) để show sequence of events, và non-defining relative clause (which had…). “Rather than attempting to sweep the issue under the rug or stall for time, I explained…” – sophisticated use của parallel structure với gerunds after “rather than”.

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Bài nói không chỉ describe sự kiện mà còn analyze the decision-making process, reflect on emotional journey, và extract meaningful lessons. The speaker demonstrates critical thinking khi discuss “transparency builds trust” và “embrace problems as opportunities” – những insights này elevate bài nói beyond simple narration sang thoughtful reflection. Việc mention “collective and ethical” handling shows awareness về broader implications beyond personal achievement.

Xử lý vấn đề kỹ thuật và quản lý khủng hoảng trong môi trường làm việc cho IELTS Speaking

---

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2 để transition sang Part 3 hoặc clarify một số điểm:

Question 1: Would you handle the situation differently now?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Maybe I would do some things differently. I think I would try to find the problem earlier next time and prepare better for emergencies.

Band 8-9 Answer:
With the benefit of hindsight, I might have implemented more rigorous testing protocols earlier in the development cycle to catch such issues proactively. However, I’m actually quite satisfied with how I handled the immediate crisis management aspect – the transparency and team collaboration were definitely the right approach.

---

Question 2: Did this experience change how you approach problems now?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, it changed my thinking a lot. Now I always try to stay calm when problems happen and think carefully about solutions. I also ask for help more quickly.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely, it was genuinely transformative. I now instinctively prioritize clear communication over attempting to single-handedly resolve issues. The experience also heightened my awareness of the importance of contingency planning – I’m much more proactive about identifying potential risks before they escalate into crises. Một ví dụ tương tự về describe a time when you used a foreign language to communicate cũng cho thấy tầm quan trọng của việc thích ứng và giao tiếp hiệu quả trong tình huống khó khăn.

---

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút và là phần thảo luận hai chiều giữa thí sinh và examiner về những vấn đề trừu tượng và sâu sắc hơn liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2. Đặc điểm của phần này là yêu cầu bạn phân tích, so sánh, đánh giá, và đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân có lý lẽ về các vấn đề rộng hơn trong xã hội.

Yêu cầu cụ thể bao gồm phải thể hiện khả năng phân tích nguyên nhân-kết quả, so sánh và đối chiếu các quan điểm khác nhau, đánh giá ưu-nhược điểm của các giải pháp, và đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân được support bằng arguments và examples từ society chứ không chỉ personal experience.

Chiến lược hiệu quả là mở rộng câu trả lời đạt 3-5 câu với structure rõ ràng, sử dụng discourse markers như “Well”, “Actually”, “I think” để tạo thời gian suy nghĩ, đưa ra examples từ xã hội hoặc các countries khác nhau thay vì chỉ nói về bản thân, và thừa nhận complexity của vấn đề bằng cách present multiple perspectives.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 3 bao gồm trả lời quá ngắn gọn dưới 2 câu thiếu elaboration, không đưa ra reasoning rõ ràng để support opinions, thiếu từ vựng abstract và academic cần thiết cho discussion sâu, và chỉ nói về personal experiences thay vì societal issues.

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Problem-Solving Skills in Society

---

Question 1: Do you think people today are better at solving problems than in the past?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare/Contrast – yêu cầu so sánh past và present
• Key words: better at solving, today vs past
• Cách tiếp cận: Present balanced view → advantages today (technology, education) → disadvantages (reliance, complexity) → nuanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think people today have more tools to solve problems because of technology. We can search for information on the internet very quickly and find solutions easily. In the past, people had to rely on their own experience or ask others directly. However, maybe people in the past were better at solving practical problems because they had more hands-on experience. So both have their advantages.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có comparison basic giữa past và present
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng repetitive (solve problems, people, past)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates main ideas nhưng lacks depth, thiếu specific examples, grammar đơn giản với limited complexity

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Well, this is quite a nuanced question that requires us to consider different types of problem-solving. On the one hand, I’d argue that contemporary society has equipped people with unprecedented access to information and resources, which undeniably enhances our collective problem-solving capacity. For instance, we can now leverage artificial intelligence, collaborate with experts globally through digital platforms, and access vast databases of solutions to similar problems others have encountered. This democratization of knowledge means that even complex technical challenges can be addressed more efficiently.

However, I’d also contend that this technological reliance might have inadvertently weakened certain fundamental problem-solving skills that previous generations possessed. People in the past often had to think more creatively and resourcefully because they couldn’t simply google a solution. They developed stronger critical thinking abilities and practical ingenuity through trial and error. Moreover, the problems people face today are increasingly complex and interconnected – issues like climate change or cybersecurity threats are fundamentally different from the challenges of previous eras.

To some extent, I believe we’re better at solving certain categories of problems, particularly those that are technical or information-based, but we may have lost ground in terms of self-reliant, creative problem-solving that doesn’t depend on external resources. The key difference is perhaps not in the inherent capability but in the nature of the problems and the tools available to address them.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Excellently organized với clear signposting (On the one hand, However, Moreover, To some extent), presents multiple perspectives before nuanced conclusion
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (nuanced, unprecedented access, democratization of knowledge, inadvertently weakened, self-reliant, inherent capability), strong collocations (collective capacity, trial and error, lost ground)
• Grammar: Wide range với passive constructions, conditionals, relative clauses (that requires, that doesn’t depend), complex noun phrases
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates sophisticated analysis với multiple dimensions, acknowledges complexity, avoids simplistic yes/no answer

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, On the one hand, However, Moreover, To some extent – create natural flow và show organized thinking
• Tentative language: I’d argue, I’d also contend, I believe – shows academic style và avoids overgeneralization
• Abstract nouns: democratization, reliance, ingenuity, capability – essential cho high-level discussion
• Hedging devices: quite, might have, perhaps, certain categories – demonstrates nuanced thinking

---

Question 2: What role should schools play in teaching problem-solving skills to children?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion – What role should…
• Key words: schools, teaching, problem-solving skills, children
• Cách tiếp cận: State position → explain specific roles schools should play → examples of effective methods → acknowledge challenges

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think schools should teach problem-solving skills because they are very important for children’s future. Teachers can give students different kinds of problems to solve in class and let them work together in groups. This will help students learn how to think and work with others. Schools should also teach subjects that develop critical thinking, not just memorization.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Has basic organization với reason và suggestion
• Vocabulary: Functional nhưng basic (very important, different kinds, work together)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates opinion clearly nhưng lacks sophisticated argumentation, limited examples, grammar mostly simple

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

I’d say schools have an absolutely pivotal role to play in cultivating problem-solving capabilities from an early age. Rather than simply focusing on rote memorization and standardized testing, educational institutions should prioritize developing students’ analytical thinking and creative reasoning skills.

Specifically, I believe schools should integrate problem-based learning across all subjects, not just mathematics or sciences. For example, instead of merely teaching historical facts, students could be presented with complex historical scenarios and asked to analyze the decisions made by leaders, evaluate alternative courses of action, and justify their reasoning. This approach transforms passive learning into active intellectual engagement. Điều này tương tự như cách describe a course you want to take in the future đòi hỏi người học phải chủ động trong việc xác định mục tiêu và phương pháp học tập.

Furthermore, schools should foster collaborative problem-solving through group projects that mirror real-world challenges. When students work in teams to tackle multifaceted problems, they develop not only cognitive skills but also essential soft skills like communication, negotiation, and conflict resolution – all of which are integral to effective problem-solving in adult life.

That being said, there are inherent challenges in implementing such approaches. Many educational systems are constrained by rigid curricula and assessment frameworks that prioritize quantifiable outcomes over skill development. Teachers themselves may lack adequate training in facilitating problem-based learning. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that investing in teacher professional development and gradually reforming assessment methods to reward creative thinking would yield substantial long-term benefits for society as a whole.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated với clear thesis → specific suggestions with examples → acknowledgment of challenges → hopeful conclusion despite difficulties
• Vocabulary: Excellent range (pivotal role, cultivating capabilities, rote memorization, analytical thinking, multifaceted problems, integral to, constrained by, yield substantial benefits), precise word choice throughout
• Grammar: Complex structures including inversion (Rather than simply focusing), participles (facilitating, rewarding), conditionals implied in suggestions, variety of tenses
• Critical Thinking: Shows deep understanding của educational theory, acknowledges both ideal scenarios and practical constraints, presents balanced sophisticated view

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Specifically, Furthermore, That being said, Nevertheless
• Tentative language: I’d say, I believe, would yield
• Abstract nouns: capabilities, engagement, negotiation, resolution, implementation, frameworks
• Strong collocations: pivotal role, rote memorization, active engagement, inherent challenges, substantial benefits

---

Theme 2: Technology and Problem-Solving

Question 3: How has technology changed the way people approach problems?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause-Effect – How has… changed
• Key words: technology, changed, approach problems
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge transformation → describe specific changes (positive) → potential drawbacks → balanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Technology has changed how we solve problems a lot. Now we can use computers and phones to find information quickly. For example, if we don’t know something, we can search on Google immediately. Also, we can ask questions on social media and get many answers from different people. This makes solving problems faster and easier than before. However, sometimes people depend too much on technology and don’t think for themselves.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Linear progression với examples
• Vocabulary: Adequate (solve problems, find information, depend on) nhưng lacks sophistication
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear communication với relevant examples nhưng analysis superficial, limited vocabulary range, grammar mostly simple structures

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Technology has fundamentally transformed our problem-solving paradigm in several profound ways. Most notably, it has exponentially accelerated the information-gathering phase of problem-solving. Whereas people previously might have spent days or weeks researching potential solutions through libraries or consulting with experts, we can now access comprehensive information within seconds through search engines and specialized databases. This dramatic reduction in information asymmetry has democratized problem-solving to an unprecedented degree.

Additionally, technology has facilitated collaborative problem-solving on a global scale. Through virtual collaboration platforms, cloud-based tools, and online communities, individuals can now pool their expertise and tackle complex challenges collectively, regardless of geographical constraints. For instance, open-source software development exemplifies how distributed teams can collectively address sophisticated technical problems that would be insurmountable for any single individual or organization.

However, this technological transformation has also introduced new complexities. There’s a growing concern about over-reliance on algorithmic solutions and AI-driven recommendations, which might diminish our capacity for independent critical thinking. When people habitually defer to technology for answers, they may inadvertently atrophy the cognitive muscles required for original problem-solving. Moreover, the sheer volume of available information can sometimes lead to analysis paralysis, where individuals become overwhelmed by choices rather than empowered by them.

On balance, I’d argue that technology has predominantly enhanced our problem-solving capabilities by expanding our toolkit and enabling collaboration, but it’s imperative that we remain conscious of the potential for cognitive dependency and actively cultivate traditional analytical skills alongside our technological proficiency.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-organized với clear progression through different aspects, balanced analysis of benefits and drawbacks, sophisticated conclusion
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated (fundamentally transformed, paradigm, exponentially accelerated, information asymmetry, democratized, insurmountable, habitually defer, inadvertently atrophy, analysis paralysis, cognitive dependency), extensive use of less common expressions
• Grammar: Full range including complex conditionals, relative clauses, participle phrases (facilitated collaborative problem-solving), advanced passive constructions, variety of sentence structures
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates deep analysis với multiple dimensions, uses specific examples (open-source development), acknowledges complexity and trade-offs, presents nuanced conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Most notably, Additionally, However, Moreover, On balance
• Academic vocabulary: paradigm, asymmetry, democratized, atrophy, imperative
• Causal language: has facilitated, has introduced, might diminish, can lead to
• Hedging: predominantly, I’d argue, potential for

Công nghệ và giải quyết vấn đề trong thời đại hiện đại cho IELTS Speaking

---

Question 4: Do you think artificial intelligence will make human problem-solving skills less important?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Future prediction/Opinion – Do you think… will
• Key words: artificial intelligence, make less important, human problem-solving skills
• Cách tiếp cận: State position → explain why AI won’t replace human skills → acknowledge areas where AI excels → emphasize complementary relationship

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I don’t think AI will make human problem-solving less important. Although AI can solve many problems very fast, humans are still needed for creative thinking and making important decisions. AI is good at analyzing data and finding patterns, but it cannot understand human emotions or think about moral issues. So I believe humans and AI should work together, with each doing what they are best at.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position với supporting reasons
• Vocabulary: Adequate (creative thinking, analyzing data, moral issues) nhưng could be more sophisticated
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates opinion clearly với relevant points nhưng lacks depth of analysis, limited range of vocabulary và structures

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

I’d strongly argue that AI will actually augment rather than diminish the importance of human problem-solving skills, though it will certainly redefine which skills are most valued. The fundamental premise we need to consider is that AI and human intelligence are qualitatively different rather than existing on the same spectrum.

What AI excels at is processing vast quantities of data, identifying patterns, and executing well-defined algorithms with remarkable speed and accuracy. For structured problems with clear parameters and established solution pathways, AI can indeed outperform humans significantly. However, the problems that truly matter in our increasingly complex world are often ill-defined, ambiguous, and require what we might call contextual wisdom rather than computational power.

Human problem-solving encompasses several dimensions that remain beyond AI’s current capabilities. Firstly, we possess emotional intelligence and empathy, which are crucial for addressing problems that involve human welfare, ethical considerations, or social dynamics. For instance, determining the most equitable way to distribute limited medical resources during a pandemic involves not just statistical optimization but moral reasoning and understanding of human dignity – areas where AI lacks genuine comprehension.

Secondly, humans have the capacity for creative leaps and innovative thinking that transcends pattern recognition. Groundbreaking solutions often emerge from lateral thinking, analogical reasoning, or serendipitous connections between seemingly unrelated domains – cognitive processes that resist algorithmic replication. When someone like describe a person who is very inspiring in their field tạo ra những đột phá, đó thường là kết quả của sự kết hợp giữa kiến thức, trực giác và sáng tạo mà AI khó có thể làm được.

Moreover, critical evaluation of whether a problem is worth solving in the first place, or whether the proposed solution aligns with human values and long-term societal wellbeing, requires judgment that is inherently human. AI can optimize for specified objectives, but it cannot autonomously determine what those objectives should be or grapple with the inherent trade-offs between competing values.

Looking ahead, I envision a future where the most effective problem-solvers will be those who can skillfully leverage AI as a tool while bringing uniquely human capacities to bear on complex challenges. The skills that will become increasingly premium are precisely those that complement rather than compete with AI: ethical reasoning, creative synthesis, emotional intelligence, strategic thinking, and the ability to frame problems in novel ways. In essence, far from making human problem-solving obsolete, AI elevates the bar for what constitutes valuable human cognitive contribution.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally sophisticated với clear thesis, multiple well-developed arguments, specific examples, forward-looking conclusion
• Vocabulary: Outstanding range (augment, qualitatively different, ill-defined, contextual wisdom, empathy, lateral thinking, serendipitous, algorithmic replication, grapple with, leverage), demonstrates full command of academic và technical vocabulary
• Grammar: Full flexibility với variety of complex structures including cleft sentences (What AI excels at is…), conditional constructions, relative clauses, participles, advanced passive voice
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates exceptional analytical depth, presents nuanced multi-dimensional argument, uses specific examples effectively, shows forward-thinking perspective, acknowledges complexity while maintaining clear position

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Firstly, Secondly, Moreover, Looking ahead, In essence
• Tentative/hedging language: I’d strongly argue, we might call, I envision
• Abstract nouns: premise, spectrum, dimensions, empathy, optimization, synthesis
• Academic phrases: qualitatively different, crucial for, transcends, resist replication, inherently human, in essence

---

Theme 3: Cultural Differences in Problem-Solving

Question 5: Do people from different cultures approach problems differently?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare/Analysis – cultural differences
• Key words: different cultures, approach problems differently
• Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge cultural variations → provide specific examples of different approaches → explain underlying cultural values → balanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think people from different cultures solve problems in different ways. For example, in Western countries, people often like to solve problems individually and quickly. But in Asian cultures, people prefer to discuss with the group and think carefully before making decisions. This is because of different cultural values about independence and teamwork. Both ways have advantages depending on the situation.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Basic comparison với example
• Vocabulary: Adequate (solve problems, individually, discuss with group) nhưng lacks depth
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates main idea với relevant example nhưng analysis superficial, limited cultural insight, basic vocabulary range

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

Absolutely, there are marked differences in problem-solving approaches across cultures, which stem from deeply ingrained values and philosophical traditions. These variations manifest in several interesting ways.

Perhaps the most well-documented distinction is between what researchers call individualistic versus collectivistic problem-solving orientations. In predominantly individualistic cultures like the United States or Northern European countries, there’s typically a strong emphasis on individual autonomy, rapid decision-making, and direct confrontation of issues. Problem-solving in these contexts often follows a linear, analytical approach where individuals are encouraged to voice their opinions assertively and take personal ownership of solutions.

In contrast, many East Asian cultures, influenced by Confucian philosophy, tend to favor consensus-building and holistic thinking in problem-solving. The focus is often on maintaining harmony within the group and considering the broader context rather than isolating variables. Decision-making processes may appear slower because they involve extensive consultation and aim to achieve collective agreement rather than pushing through an individual’s preferred solution. Khái niệm này cũng được thể hiện rõ khi describe a recent day trip you enjoyed trong bối cảnh du lịch nhóm, nơi cách tiếp cận vấn đề phụ thuộc nhiều vào văn hóa tập thể.

Another fascinating dimension involves attitudes toward uncertainty. Some cultures, particularly those with high uncertainty avoidance like Japan or Germany, prefer structured, systematic approaches to problem-solving with well-defined procedures and minimal ambiguity. Conversely, cultures more comfortable with ambiguity, such as those in Latin America or parts of Southeast Asia, may embrace more flexible, improvisational strategies that adapt dynamically to evolving circumstances.

Communication styles also play a crucial role. High-context cultures, where meaning is heavily embedded in context and relationships, may approach problem-solving through indirect communication and implicit understanding. Low-context cultures, where explicit verbal communication is prioritized, tend toward direct articulation of problems and solutions.

However, I should emphasize that these are broad generalizations that don’t apply uniformly to all individuals within a culture. Globalization, cross-cultural exchange, and individual personality differences mean there’s considerable variation within any cultural group. Moreover, the most effective global organizations are those that can leverage diverse problem-solving approaches, recognizing that different cultural perspectives can complement each other and lead to more robust solutions.

Ultimately, understanding these cultural differences is increasingly vital in our interconnected world, not to stereotype but to appreciate and harness the rich diversity of human problem-solving capabilities.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-organized với multiple dimensions of cultural differences, specific examples, acknowledgment of complexity và limitations of generalizations
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated (marked differences, ingrained values, manifest in, assertively, consensus-building, holistic thinking, uncertainty avoidance, improvisational, embedded in, leverage diverse), demonstrates extensive academic vocabulary range
• Grammar: Full range of complex structures including passive voice, relative clauses, participles, conditionals, cleft sentences, demonstrates full flexibility
• Critical Thinking: Shows deep cross-cultural awareness, provides specific research-based framework, uses examples effectively, acknowledges nuance và individual variation, avoids stereotyping while discussing patterns

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Perhaps, In contrast, Another fascinating dimension, Conversely, However, Moreover, Ultimately
• Academic vocabulary: predominantly, orientations, manifest, philosophy, dimension, dynamics
• Hedging language: tend to, typically, may appear, broad generalizations, considerable variation
• Comparative structures: In contrast, Conversely, more…than, different…from

---

Question 6: Is it always better to solve problems as a team rather than individually?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Evaluate – Is it always better…
• Key words: always better, team, individually
• Cách tiếp cận: Reject absolute statement → discuss advantages of teamwork → discuss situations where individual approach better → nuanced conclusion về context-dependency

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I don’t think it’s always better to work in a team. Sometimes teamwork is good because people can share ideas and help each other. For big or complicated problems, teams are usually better. But for simple problems, working alone can be faster and more efficient. Also, some people work better alone. So it depends on the problem and the person.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Presents both sides với basic reasoning
• Vocabulary: Functional (share ideas, complicated problems, work better alone) nhưng lacks sophistication
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates balanced view nhưng analysis shallow, limited vocabulary range, grammar mostly simple

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8.5-9:

I’d argue that the word “always” in this question is the key point to challenge because optimal problem-solving approaches are highly context-dependent. While teamwork certainly offers substantial advantages in many scenarios, individual problem-solving has its own distinct merits, and the most effective approach often involves strategic alternation between both modes.

The case for collaborative problem-solving is compelling in several contexts. When dealing with multifaceted challenges that require diverse expertise, collective intelligence typically surpasses individual capacity. Teams bring together complementary skill sets, varied perspectives, and distributed knowledge that can illuminate different facets of a problem. Furthermore, the interactive process of bouncing ideas off one another often catalyzes creative breakthroughs that might not emerge in isolation – what psychologists call cognitive synergy. Group problem-solving also provides built-in quality control through peer review and constructive criticism, potentially catching blind spots that an individual might miss.

However, collaborative approaches have inherent limitations and costs that shouldn’t be overlooked. Groupthink – the tendency for cohesive groups to prioritize consensus over critical evaluation – can actually stifle innovative thinking and lead to suboptimal decisions. Social dynamics can introduce inefficiencies: dominant personalities might overshadow valuable contributions from quieter members, political considerations might trump objective analysis, and coordination challenges can significantly slow the problem-solving process.

Individual problem-solving, by contrast, offers certain distinct advantages. For problems requiring deep concentration, sustained focus, or highly specialized expertise, solitary work often proves more productive. Individuals can work at their own pace, follow their intuitive hunches without needing to justify every step, and avoid the cognitive overhead of constant coordination. Some of the most groundbreaking innovations in history emerged from individuals working in relative isolation – think of Einstein developing relativity theory or authors crafting complex narratives.

In practice, the most sophisticated problem-solving often involves what I’d call a hybrid approach. Individuals might engage in independent exploration and analysis first, then reconvene as a team to share findings, debate alternatives, and synthesize insights. This allows for the benefits of both deep individual thinking and collective wisdom. Companies like Google have institutionalized this balance through practices like “20% time” for individual exploration alongside collaborative team projects.

The determining factors for choosing an approach should include: the nature and complexity of the problem, the time constraints involved, the availability of expertise, the cultural context, and even the personalities of those involved. Rather than asking which is “better,” we should ask “what combination of individual and collective effort will optimize outcomes for this particular challenge?”

In conclusion, effective problem-solvers need to be adept at both working independently and collaboratively, with the wisdom to discern when each approach is most appropriate. The future belongs to those who can fluidly navigate between these modes rather than rigidly adhering to one approach.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Masterfully organized với challenge to question’s premise, comprehensive analysis of both approaches với specific advantages/disadvantages, introduction of hybrid model, context-dependent conclusion
• Vocabulary: Exceptional range (optimal, context-dependent, multifaceted, catalyzes, cognitive synergy, groupthink, stifle, overshadow, trump, institutionalized, fluidly navigate), demonstrates full command of sophisticated academic và professional vocabulary
• Grammar: Full flexibility với all complex structures used accurately và naturally, including conditionals, relative clauses, participles, cleft sentences, advanced passive constructions
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates exceptional analytical depth, challenges assumptions in question, presents multi-dimensional analysis, introduces research concepts (cognitive synergy, groupthink), provides real-world examples (Google), offers sophisticated synthesis in hybrid approach

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: While, Furthermore, However, By contrast, In practice, Rather than, In conclusion
• Academic vocabulary: context-dependent, multifaceted, complementary, catalyzes, inherent, institutionalized, optimize
• Evaluative language: compelling, substantial advantages, distinct merits, inherent limitations, most sophisticated
• Hedging: I’d argue, often, typically, might, tend to, should

---

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
major setback	n	/ˈmeɪdʒə ˈsetbæk/	trở ngại lớn, thất bại nghiêm trọng	We faced a major setback when our funding was cut.	experience/encounter/face/suffer a major setback
troubleshoot	v	/ˈtrʌbl.ʃuːt/	khắc phục sự cố, tìm và sửa lỗi	I spent hours troubleshooting the computer problem.	troubleshoot a problem/issue, systematically troubleshoot
methodically	adv	/məˈθɒd.ɪ.kəl.i/	một cách có phương pháp, có hệ thống	She approached the task methodically, step by step.	work/approach/proceed methodically
strike a balance	phrase	/straɪk ə ˈbæl.əns/	tạo sự cân bằng	It’s difficult to strike a balance between work and family.	strike a balance between, struggle to strike a balance
recurring issue	n	/rɪˈkɜː.rɪŋ ˈɪʃ.uː/	vấn đề tái diễn, lặp lại	This is a recurring issue that needs permanent solution.	address/tackle/resolve a recurring issue
weigh up options	phrase	/weɪ ʌp ˈɒp.ʃənz/	cân nhắc các lựa chọn	Before deciding, we need to weigh up all the options.	carefully weigh up, weigh up the pros and cons
initial response	n	/ɪˈnɪʃ.əl rɪˈspɒns/	phản ứng ban đầu	My initial response was to panic, but I calmed down.	initial response to, immediate/instinctive initial response
knee-jerk reaction	n	/niː dʒɜːk riˈæk.ʃən/	phản ứng bản năng, không suy nghĩ	Making decisions based on knee-jerk reactions is unwise.	avoid knee-jerk reactions, typical knee-jerk reaction
assess objectively	phrase	/əˈses əbˈdʒek.tɪv.li/	đánh giá khách quan	Try to assess the situation objectively without bias.	assess objectively, need to assess more objectively
beyond one’s expertise	phrase	/bɪˈjɒnd wʌnz ˌek.spɜːˈtiːz/	ngoài khả năng chuyên môn	This technical problem is beyond my expertise.	falls beyond my expertise, clearly beyond
formidable challenge	n	/ˈfɔː.mɪ.də.bəl ˈtʃæl.ɪndʒ/	thách thức to lớn	Climate change presents a formidable challenge.	face/overcome/tackle a formidable challenge
catastrophic failure	n	/ˌkæt.əˈstrɒf.ɪk ˈfeɪl.jə/	sự thất bại thảm khốc	The system experienced a catastrophic failure.	risk/avoid/prevent catastrophic failure
nerve-wracking	adj	/ˈnɜːv ˌræk.ɪŋ/	căng thẳng thần kinh, hồi hộp	Waiting for the results was a nerve-wracking experience.	nerve-wracking situation/experience/ordeal
inadvertently	adv	/ˌɪn.ədˈvɜː.tənt.li/	vô tình, không cố ý	I inadvertently deleted the important file.	inadvertently cause/create/reveal
succumb to	v	/səˈkʌm tuː/	굴복하다, chịu thua	Don’t succumb to pressure and make hasty decisions.	succumb to pressure/temptation/anxiety
counterproductive	adj	/ˌkaʊn.tə.prəˈdʌk.tɪv/	phản tác dụng, phản hiệu quả	Criticizing employees publicly is often counterproductive.	prove/become counterproductive
round the clock	phrase	/raʊnd ðə klɒk/	suốt ngày đêm, 24/7	The team worked round the clock to meet the deadline.	work/operate round the clock
avert disaster	phrase	/əˈvɜːt dɪˈzɑː.stə/	ngăn chặn thảm họa	Quick action helped avert a major disaster.	narrowly avert, manage to avert disaster
rally together	v	/ˈræl.i təˈɡeð.ə/	đoàn kết lại, cùng nhau ủng hộ	The community rallied together during the crisis.	rally together in support, people rallied together
daunting	adj	/ˈdɔːn.tɪŋ/	đáng sợ, nản lòng	The task ahead seems quite daunting.	daunting task/challenge/prospect

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
put someone’s skills to the test	thử thách kỹ năng của ai đó	This crisis really put my leadership skills to the test.	7.5-9
fall into place	mọi thứ diễn ra suôn sẻ, ổn thỏa	After weeks of planning, everything finally fell into place.	7-8
pull out	rút lui, không tham gia nữa	Our main investor unexpectedly pulled out of the deal.	7-8
dwell on	mải mê suy nghĩ về điều gì	There’s no point dwelling on past mistakes.	7.5-8.5
gain momentum	tăng tốc, phát triển mạnh	The campaign gained unexpected momentum on social media.	7.5-9
pull off	thực hiện thành công điều khó	Against all odds, we managed to pull off the event.	7.5-8.5
sweep under the rug	che giấu vấn đề, không giải quyết	We can’t just sweep these problems under the rug.	8-9
stall for time	kéo dài thời gian, trì hoãn	He was clearly stalling for time while thinking of an answer.	7.5-8.5
garner respect	thu được sự tôn trọng	Her honest approach garnered respect from the team.	8-9
at the end of the day	cuối cùng thì, xét cho cùng	At the end of the day, what matters is the result.	7-8
think outside the box	suy nghĩ sáng tạo, không theo lối mòn	To solve this, we need to think outside the box.	7-8
back to the drawing board	bắt đầu lại từ đầu	The plan failed, so it’s back to the drawing board.	7.5-8

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Dùng khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ ngắn, tạo sự tự nhiên
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc thông tin bất ngờ
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi muốn nói thật, thể hiện sự chân thành
• 📝 I’d say that… – Cách formal để đưa ra quan điểm
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Nhấn mạnh đây là góc nhìn cá nhân

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, hơn nữa
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn thế nữa
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến, không nói đến
• 📝 Furthermore,… – Hơn nữa (formal hơn)
• 📝 In addition to that,… – Thêm vào đó

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét
• 📝 Having said that,… – Tuy nhiên, mặc dù đã nói vậy
• 📝 That being said,… – Dù đã nói như vậy (formal)

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, xét tổng thể
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, xét cho cùng
• 📝 To sum up,… – Để tóm tắt lại
• 📝 In conclusion,… – Kết luận lại
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng, rốt cuộc

Để giải thích hoặc làm rõ:

• 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác
• 📝 That is to say,… – Nghĩa là, tức là
• 📝 To put it another way,… – Nói theo cách khác

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

• Mixed conditional (Type 2 + Type 3): If I were more experienced back then, I would have handled the situation differently.

  • Formula: If + Past Simple, would have + Past Participle
  • Dùng để diễn tả điều kiện không có thật ở hiện tại ảnh hưởng đến quá khứ

• Inversion for emphasis: Had I known about the problem earlier, I could have prevented it.

  • Formula: Had + Subject + Past Participle, Subject + could/would have + Past Participle
  • Tạo formal style và nhấn mạnh điều kiện

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

• Non-defining relative clause: The solution, which took weeks to develop, proved highly effective.

  • Formula: …, which/who + clause, …
  • Bổ sung thông tin không thiết yếu, luôn có dấu phẩy

• Reduced relative clause: The problem affecting our system turned out to be minor.

  • Formula: Subject + V-ing/V-ed + Object
  • Rút gọn mệnh đề quan hệ để câu gọn hơn

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

• It is thought/believed/said that…: It is widely believed that collaborative problem-solving yields better results.

  • Formula: It + be + Past Participle + that clause
  • Dùng để nói về quan điểm chung, tránh chủ ngữ cụ thể

• Advanced passive structures: The issue needs to be addressed immediately before it escalates.

  • Formula: Need/Want/Require + to be + Past Participle
  • Thể hiện necessity với passive voice

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

• What clause for emphasis: What I find most challenging about problem-solving is maintaining objectivity under pressure.

  • Formula: What + Subject + Verb + be + Noun/Clause
  • Nhấn mạnh phần thông tin quan trọng

• It is/was… that…: It was the team’s collaborative effort that ultimately saved the project.

  • Formula: It + be + focused element + that/who + rest of sentence
  • Nhấn mạnh một thành phần cụ thể trong câu

5. Participle Clauses (Mệnh đề phân từ):

• Present participle (V-ing): Having analyzed all the options, we chose the most cost-effective solution.

  • Formula: Having + Past Participle, Main clause
  • Diễn tả hành động xảy ra trước hành động chính

• Past participle (V-ed): Confronted with a difficult choice, I decided to seek expert advice.

  • Formula: Past Participle + phrases, Main clause
  • Diễn tả nguyên nhân hoặc điều kiện

Bài viết này đã cung cấp hướng dẫn toàn diện về cách trả lời chủ đề “Describe a situation when you had to deal with a problem” trong IELTS Speaking, từ Part 1 đến Part 3, với các bài mẫu chi tiết theo từng band điểm và phân tích chuyên sâu. Hy vọng những chiến lược, từ vựng và cấu trúc ngữ pháp được chia sẻ sẽ giúp bạn tự tin hơn khi đối mặt với chủ đề này trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking thực tế.