IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe A Situation Where You Had To Think Quickly” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Trong các kỳ thi IELTS Speaking gần đây, chủ đề về những tình huống cần phản ứng nhanh xuất hiện với tần suất ngày càng cao. Đề bài yêu cầu thí sinh kể về một lần phải suy nghĩ và xử lý tình huống một cách linh hoạt, không chỉ đánh giá khả năng ngôn ngữ mà còn thể hiện tư duy logic và kỹ năng kể chuyện.

Tần suất xuất hiện: Chủ đề này xuất hiện thường xuyên trong các đề thi IELTS từ 2022 đến 2024, được đánh giá là một trong những topic phổ biến nhất thuộc nhóm “Describe an experience”. Theo thống kê từ các trung tâm luyện thi, đề này xuất hiện ở khoảng 15-20% các buổi thi Speaking Part 2. Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai: Cao.

Những gì bạn sẽ học được:

• 10+ câu hỏi thực tế trong cả 3 Part liên quan đến chủ đề “thinking quickly”
• 3 bài mẫu hoàn chỉnh cho Part 2 theo band 6-7, 7.5-8, và 8.5-9 với phân tích chi tiết
• Từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm về decision-making, problem-solving, và quick thinking
• Chiến lược trả lời từ góc nhìn của Examiner chính thức
• Các lỗi phổ biến của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Thời gian: 4-5 phút với 10-12 câu hỏi ngắn về cuộc sống hàng ngày. Đặc điểm của Part 1 là câu hỏi đơn giản, friendly, giúp thí sinh “warm up” trước khi vào phần khó hơn. Mục tiêu là trả lời tự nhiên như đang trò chuyện, mỗi câu nên kéo dài 2-3 câu với một chút mở rộng ý.

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn kiểu “Yes, I do” hoặc “No, I don’t” rồi im lặng
• Sử dụng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “bad”, “like”, “don’t like”
• Không đưa ra ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
• Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm do lo lắng

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you think you are good at making quick decisions?

Question 2: Can you describe a recent situation when you had to think on your feet?

Question 3: Are you usually a fast thinker or do you prefer taking your time?

Question 4: How do you handle unexpected problems in daily life?

Question 5: Do you think young people today are better at quick thinking than previous generations?

Question 6: What kind of situations make you feel pressured to think quickly?

Question 7: Have you ever regretted a quick decision you made?

Question 8: Do you prefer planning ahead or dealing with things as they come?

Question 9: How do you stay calm when facing urgent situations?

Question 10: What helps you make better decisions under pressure?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you think you are good at making quick decisions?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp có hay không (hoặc “it depends”)
• Đưa ra lý do hoặc giải thích về bản thân
• Thêm một ví dụ ngắn gọn để minh họa

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think I’m quite good at it. I usually can make decisions fast when I need to. For example, when I’m shopping, I can choose things quickly without thinking too much.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi, có ví dụ cụ thể
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng đơn giản (good, fast, choose), thiếu chi tiết về “why”, ví dụ hơi surface-level
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đáp ứng yêu cầu cơ bản với fluency ổn nhưng chưa có depth. Grammar đơn giản, vocabulary trong vùng intermediate.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’d say I’m fairly decisive when it comes to making snap decisions. I think it’s partly because I’ve always been quite spontaneous by nature. What helps me is that I try to trust my gut instinct rather than overthinking things. For instance, just last week, when my colleague suddenly fell ill before an important presentation, I had to step in at a moment’s notice and think on my feet to deliver it without much preparation.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:

  • Vocabulary tinh tế: “fairly decisive”, “snap decisions”, “spontaneous”, “trust my gut instinct”, “step in at a moment’s notice”, “think on my feet”
  • Structure rõ ràng: opinion → reason (personality trait) → additional point (strategy) → concrete example
  • Grammar phức tạp: “when it comes to + V-ing”, “partly because”, relative clause
  • Ví dụ cụ thể và relevant hơn nhiều

• Tại sao Band 8-9:

  • Fluency: Câu trả lời trôi chảy, tự nhiên với discourse markers như “I’d say”, “What helps me”
  • Vocabulary: Sử dụng collocations như “snap decisions”, “gut instinct”, “at a moment’s notice” – đều là expressions native speakers dùng
  • Grammar: Mix của simple và complex structures một cách natural
  • Ideas: Đa chiều – có personality trait, strategy, và example workplace

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• fairly decisive: khá quyết đoán
• snap decision: quyết định nhanh chóng, tức thì
• spontaneous: tự phát, không cần suy nghĩ nhiều
• trust my gut instinct: tin vào trực giác
• step in at a moment’s notice: thay thế ai đó ngay lập tức
• think on my feet: suy nghĩ nhanh trong tình huống bất ngờ

---

Question: How do you handle unexpected problems in daily life?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nói về approach hoặc strategy của bạn
• Có thể chia thành 2-3 bước hoặc cách xử lý
• Kết thúc bằng kết quả hoặc feeling

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“When I face unexpected problems, I try to stay calm first. Then I think about what I can do to solve it. Usually, I ask someone for help if the problem is too difficult.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có structure đơn giản (calm → think → ask for help), dễ hiểu
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary basic (stay calm, think about, solve, difficult), thiếu personality, generic answer
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate nhưng thiếu sophistication và personal touch

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, I’d say my approach is quite pragmatic. The first thing I do is take a step back and assess the situation objectively rather than panicking immediately. I find that staying level-headed helps me identify the core issue more clearly. Then I usually weigh up my options and choose the most feasible solution. If it’s something beyond my expertise, I’m not afraid to reach out to people who might have more experience. I think this methodical approach has served me well over the years.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:

  • Opening natural với “Well, I’d say”
  • Vocabulary cao cấp: “pragmatic”, “assess objectively”, “staying level-headed”, “identify the core issue”, “weigh up options”, “feasible solution”, “beyond my expertise”, “methodical approach”
  • Structure logic: assess → weigh options → choose solution → seek help if needed → reflection
  • Personal reflection ở cuối “has served me well” thể hiện maturity

• Tại sao Band 8-9:

  • Fluency: Natural flow với discourse markers
  • Vocabulary: Precise và sophisticated, không repetitive
  • Grammar: Complex sentences với relative clauses, conditional meanings
  • Ideas: Structured thinking process, shows self-awareness và practical approach

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• pragmatic: thực dụng, thực tế
• take a step back: lùi lại một bước (để nhìn toàn cảnh)
• assess the situation objectively: đánh giá tình huống một cách khách quan
• staying level-headed: giữ bình tĩnh, không hoảng loạn
• weigh up options: cân nhắc các lựa chọn
• beyond my expertise: ngoài chuyên môn của tôi
• methodical approach: cách tiếp cận có phương pháp

Chiến lược xử lý vấn đề bất ngờ trong IELTS Speaking Part 1 về tình huống suy nghĩ nhanh

---

Question: What kind of situations make you feel pressured to think quickly?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đưa ra 2-3 loại tình huống cụ thể
• Giải thích tại sao những tình huống đó tạo pressure
• Có thể thêm feeling hoặc reaction của bạn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I feel pressured when I have to answer difficult questions in meetings or when something breaks and I need to fix it fast. These situations are stressful because other people are waiting for me.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có 2 examples cụ thể (meetings, fixing things)
• Hạn chế: Explanation ngắn và generic, vocabulary đơn giản (difficult, breaks, fix, fast, stressful, waiting)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicative nhưng lacks sophistication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“There are several scenarios that put me under pressure to think quickly. Primarily, it’s when I’m in high-stakes meetings where clients are asking tough, on-the-spot questions about our proposals – there’s simply no time to deliberate extensively. Another situation would be technical emergencies, like when our website crashed during a major campaign launch. What amplifies the pressure in these cases is the cascading effect – a delayed decision could have serious repercussions. I also find that public speaking situations where I need to field unexpected questions from the audience can be quite nerve-wracking.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:

  • Variety of situations: meetings, technical issues, public speaking
  • Sophisticated vocabulary: “high-stakes meetings”, “on-the-spot questions”, “deliberate extensively”, “cascading effect”, “have serious repercussions”, “field questions”, “nerve-wracking”
  • Shows understanding of consequence và impact
  • Well-structured với “Primarily”, “Another situation”, “What amplifies”

• Tại sao Band 8-9:

  • Fluency: Smooth transitions giữa các ideas
  • Vocabulary: Professional và precise, topic-specific terms
  • Grammar: Complex structures như “when + subject + verb”, “could have repercussions”
  • Ideas: Demonstrates critical thinking về why pressure exists (cascading effect, serious consequences)

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• put me under pressure: tạo áp lực lên tôi
• high-stakes meetings: cuộc họp quan trọng, có nhiều điều bị đe dọa
• on-the-spot questions: câu hỏi tại chỗ, ngay lập tức
• deliberate extensively: cân nhắc kỹ lưỡng
• cascading effect: hiệu ứng dây chuyền
• have serious repercussions: có hậu quả nghiêm trọng
• field questions: trả lời câu hỏi (đặc biệt là khó hoặc bất ngờ)
• nerve-wracking: căng thẳng, lo lắng

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Thời gian chuẩn bị: 1 phút (60 giây) – đây là thời gian vàng để outline câu trả lời
Thời gian nói: 2-3 phút liên tục không bị gián đoạn

Đặc điểm: Part 2 là phần độc thoại, nơi thí sinh phải duy trì câu chuyện liên tục trong 2 phút. Examiner sẽ không ngắt lời bạn cho đến khi hết thời gian.

Chiến lược quan trọng:

• Sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị: Ghi chú keywords cho từng bullet point, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Nói đủ 2 phút: Mục tiêu tối thiểu là 1.5 phút. Nếu dưới thời gian này, examiner sẽ nghĩ bạn thiếu content
• Cover đầy đủ bullet points: Mỗi bullet point nên có 3-4 câu
• Thì động từ: Với đề “describe a situation”, chủ yếu dùng past tenses
• Bullet point cuối (explain) là quan trọng nhất: Đây là nơi bạn thể hiện depth of thinking

Lỗi thường gặp:

• Không dùng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị, lao vào nói ngay và bị “blank” giữa chừng
• Nói quá ngắn (dưới 1.5 phút) vì hết ý tưởng
• Bỏ sót bullet points, đặc biệt là phần “explain”
• Kể chuyện không có structure, nhảy lung tung
• Sử dụng quá nhiều “and then… and then…”

Cue Card

Describe A Situation Where You Had To Think Quickly

You should say:

• When and where this situation happened
• What the situation was
• What you did and how you handled it
• And explain how you felt about thinking quickly in that situation

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an experience/event – thuộc nhóm past event narrative

Thì động từ chủ yếu: Past Simple và Past Continuous để kể chuyện. Có thể dùng Past Perfect cho background information.

Bullet points phải cover:

1. When and where: Set the scene – thời gian, địa điểm, context
2. What the situation was: Mô tả vấn đề/challenge – cái gì xảy ra, tại sao cần quick thinking
3. What you did: Actions cụ thể – các bước bạn đã làm để xử lý
4. Explain how you felt: Đây là phần scoring cao nhất – feelings, reflections, lessons learned

Câu “explain how you felt” quan trọng: Nhiều thí sinh chỉ focus vào kể chuyện mà quên phần reflection. Phần này cần:

• Cảm xúc trong lúc đó (nervous, stressed, adrenaline rush)
• Cảm xúc sau đó (relieved, proud, grateful)
• Lessons learned hoặc impact lâu dài
• Why it was significant to you

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

“I want to talk about a time when I had to think quickly. This happened about six months ago when I was at my workplace.

It was a normal Tuesday morning and I was working at my desk. Suddenly, my manager told me that an important client was coming to visit our office in 30 minutes. The problem was that my colleague who was supposed to give the presentation was sick and couldn’t come. My manager asked me to do the presentation instead.

I felt very nervous because I didn’t prepare anything. But I had to do it, so I quickly looked at my colleague’s presentation file on the computer. I read through the main points and tried to remember the important information. I also printed some documents to give to the client.

When the client arrived, I greeted them and started the presentation. I spoke about our company’s services and answered their questions. Sometimes I wasn’t sure about some details, but I tried my best to explain clearly.

In the end, the client seemed happy with the presentation. They said thank you and left with a smile. I felt very relieved when it was over. I was also quite proud of myself because I handled the situation well even though I was not prepared. This experience taught me that I can perform well under pressure.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Câu chuyện có structure rõ ràng với timeline logic. Sử dụng sequencing words như “suddenly”, “when”, “in the end”. Tuy nhiên thiếu variety trong linking devices.
Lexical Resource	6	Vocabulary đơn giản và repetitive: “very nervous”, “very relieved”, “quite proud”. Thiếu topic-specific words về presentations và quick thinking.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Chủ yếu dùng simple và compound sentences. Có một số complex sentences với “when”, “because”, “even though”. Grammar đúng nhưng không đa dạng.
Pronunciation	6-7	Giả định phát âm rõ ràng, dễ hiểu với vài lỗi nhỏ không ảnh hưởng communication.

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Cover đủ 4 bullet points của đề bài
• ✅ Story có beginning, middle, end rõ ràng
• ✅ Grammar chính xác, ít lỗi sai
• ✅ Dễ hiểu, communicative

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary quá basic: “very nervous”, “happy”, “proud” – thiếu precision
• ⚠️ Thiếu details cụ thể: presentation về gì? Client là ai?
• ⚠️ Phần “explain feelings” còn surface-level, chưa có depth
• ⚠️ Câu đơn giản, thiếu variety trong sentence structures
• ⚠️ Thời lượng hơi ngắn (khoảng 1.5 phút)

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

“I’d like to describe a rather stressful situation that occurred about eight months ago when I was working at a marketing agency in downtown Ho Chi Minh City.

It was a Friday afternoon, and I was wrapping up my weekly tasks when my team leader burst into the office looking visibly distressed. She informed me that our senior account manager had been involved in a car accident on his way to an important client pitch and wouldn’t be able to make it. The client was a potential major account worth over $100,000, and the meeting was scheduled to start in just 45 minutes.

Given the circumstances, I had to step up to the plate. I immediately requested access to the presentation files and started frantically reviewing the key points. The challenge was that I had only been peripherally involved in this project, so I wasn’t familiar with all the details. I prioritized the most critical information – the client’s pain points, our proposed solutions, and the pricing structure. I also made a quick call to my hospitalized colleague to get some insider tips about the client’s preferences and concerns.

When I arrived at the client’s office, my heart was racing, but I tried to maintain my composure. I started by acknowledging the last-minute change and apologizing for any inconvenience. Then I dove into the presentation, focusing on how our strategies could address their specific challenges. Whenever I encountered questions I wasn’t entirely sure about, I was honest and promised to follow up with detailed information rather than making things up.

Looking back on it, I felt an incredible mix of emotions. Initially, there was definitely a surge of panic and anxiety – that feeling of being thrown into the deep end. During the presentation itself, adrenaline was pumping through my veins, which actually helped me stay sharp and focused. Afterwards, when the client expressed interest in moving forward, I felt an immense sense of relief and accomplishment. What struck me most was that this experience boosted my confidence significantly. It taught me that I’m more capable of handling high-pressure situations than I had previously thought, and that authenticity and honesty can actually work in your favor, even when you don’t have all the answers.”

Với chủ đề describe a time when you helped someone with a personal problem, học viên cũng cần kỹ năng tư duy nhanh để đưa ra lời khuyên phù hợp trong tình huống khẩn cấp.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Câu chuyện flows tự nhiên với variety của cohesive devices. Có clear progression từ setup → challenge → action → outcome → reflection. Không có hesitation hay repetition.
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range của vocabulary với collocations tự nhiên: “burst into”, “step up to the plate”, “frantically reviewing”, “maintain my composure”, “thrown into the deep end”. Less common phrases được dùng appropriately.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Mix tốt của simple, compound và complex sentences. Sử dụng past continuous, past perfect, và conditional forms chính xác. Variety trong sentence openings.
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Giả định có good control of intonation, word stress, và sentence stress. Một số features của connected speech.

Kỹ năng xử lý tình huống khẩn cấp và tư duy nhanh trong IELTS Speaking Part 2

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“very nervous”, “happy”, “tried my best”	“visibly distressed”, “maintain my composure”, “adrenaline was pumping”, “thrown into the deep end”
Grammar	“I felt very nervous”, “The client seemed happy”	“Given the circumstances”, “What struck me most was that…”, “I’m more capable of handling… than I had previously thought”
Ideas	Basic description: got task → prepared → did it → felt relieved	Rich details: context → specific challenges → strategic approach → nuanced emotions → deep reflection
Linking	Simple: “suddenly”, “when”, “in the end”	Sophisticated: “Given the circumstances”, “Looking back on it”, “What struck me most”

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

“I’d like to recount a particularly nerve-wracking experience that put my quick-thinking abilities to the test during my time working as a junior event coordinator at an international conference center here in Vietnam.

This incident took place approximately a year ago during what was supposed to be the crowning achievement of our team’s efforts – a three-day international technology summit that had attracted over 500 delegates from across Southeast Asia. It was the second day of the conference, and everything had been running like clockwork until about 20 minutes before the keynote speech by a prominent tech CEO.

What unfolded was essentially every event planner’s worst nightmare. Our main conference hall’s entire audiovisual system suffered a catastrophic failure – the projectors went dead, the microphone system was producing ear-piercing feedback, and the lighting controls were completely unresponsive. To compound matters, our senior AV technician was conspicuously absent, having stepped out to handle another issue in a different venue. The gravity of the situation hit me immediately: we had hundreds of attendees already taking their seats, a high-profile speaker preparing backstage, and less than 20 minutes to avert a complete disaster.

In that moment, I had to compartmentalize my panic and adopt a systematic approach. First, I swiftly delegated tasks to my two junior colleagues – one to keep the speaker informed and comfortable, essentially buying us time, while the other contacted our backup technical support team. Meanwhile, I made the split-second decision to relocate the entire session to our secondary auditorium, which, fortunately, was unoccupied and equipped with functioning AV systems. However, this meant coordinating a logistical nightmare: redirecting 500+ attendees, swiftly transporting all the presentation materials, and ensuring our VIP speaker was escorted to the new location without experiencing undue stress.

What I find remarkable in retrospect is how remarkably calm I remained externally while my mind was racing through various contingency scenarios. I utilized our venue’s digital signage system to broadcast the room change, stationed team members at strategic points to guide attendees, and personally escorted the keynote speaker, explaining the situation with deliberate calmness and reassuring confidence. The presentation ultimately commenced just seven minutes behind schedule, and remarkably, several attendees later commented that the seamless transition actually demonstrated our team’s professionalism.

Emotionally, this experience was quite a journey. In those initial moments of crisis, I distinctly remember a visceral wave of panic washing over me – that stomach-dropping sensation of realizing that significant professional reputations were hanging in the balance, including my own. During the actual crisis management, there was this peculiar cocktail of hyper-focused determination and underlying anxiety. It’s almost as if my brain had shifted into overdrive – I was simultaneously processing multiple information streams, making rapid-fire decisions, and projecting an aura of controlled confidence to keep my team steady.

In the aftermath, once the adrenaline subsided, I experienced a profound sense of professional validation. This incident fundamentally shifted my self-perception – I realized I possessed a capacity for grace under pressure that I hadn’t fully appreciated before. More significantly, it taught me that effective quick thinking isn’t just about speed; it’s about maintaining clarity amidst chaos, trusting your preparation and instincts, and understanding that sometimes imperfect action is infinitely superior to perfect paralysis. This experience has become something of a touchstone moment in my career, one that I draw upon whenever I encounter high-stakes situations requiring immediate decision-making.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	9	Exceptional coherence với sophisticated progression. Storytelling captivating với natural pacing. Discourse markers đa dạng và appropriate. Zero hesitation.
Lexical Resource	9	Outstanding range với precise, sophisticated vocabulary. Idiomatic language được sử dụng naturally: “crowning achievement”, “running like clockwork”, “every planner’s worst nightmare”, “avert a complete disaster”. Collocations chính xác: “catastrophic failure”, “ear-piercing feedback”, “compartmentalize my panic”.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	9	Full range của structures sử dụng flexible và accurately. Complex sentences với multiple clauses. Advanced structures: “What I find remarkable in retrospect is how…”, “It’s almost as if…”, conditional forms, perfect aspects.
Pronunciation	9	Giả định có full flexibility với features của pronunciation: sentence stress, intonation patterns, connected speech, appropriate pausing for dramatic effect.

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:

• Câu chuyện được kể một cách captivating với clear narrative arc
• Sử dụng varied discourse markers: “What unfolded”, “In that moment”, “What I find remarkable in retrospect”
• Natural pausing và pacing tạo dramatic effect
• Không có repetition hay self-correction

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• Idiomatic expressions: “running like clockwork”, “every planner’s worst nightmare”, “avert a disaster”, “grace under pressure”, “perfect paralysis”
• Precise collocations: “catastrophic failure”, “ear-piercing feedback”, “visceral wave of panic”, “rapid-fire decisions”, “professional validation”
• Topic-specific language: “AV system”, “keynote speech”, “contingency scenarios”, “digital signage”
• Sophisticated adjectives: “nerve-wracking”, “conspicuously absent”, “deliberate calmness”

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Complex sentences: “What I find remarkable in retrospect is how remarkably calm I remained externally while my mind was racing through various contingency scenarios”
• Relative clauses: “which, fortunately, was unoccupied and equipped with…”
• Participial phrases: “having stepped out to handle another issue”
• Conditional structures: “It’s almost as if my brain had shifted into overdrive”
• Perfect aspects: “I hadn’t fully appreciated before”, “has become something of a touchstone moment”

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:

• Không chỉ kể chuyện mà còn có psychological insights: “compartmentalize my panic”, “visceral wave of panic”, “peculiar cocktail of hyper-focused determination”
• Reflection profound: “fundamentally shifted my self-perception”, “imperfect action is infinitely superior to perfect paralysis”
• Professional maturity: “significant professional reputations were hanging in the balance”
• Lessons learned clearly articulated với broader implications

🎭 Storytelling Elements:

• Strong opening: “particularly nerve-wracking experience that put my abilities to the test”
• Building tension: “every event planner’s worst nightmare”, “less than 20 minutes to avert disaster”
• Climax: The actual problem-solving process
• Resolution: “commenced just seven minutes behind schedule”
• Reflection: Deep analysis of emotions và lessons learned

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner thường hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2 để transition sang Part 3:

Question 1: Do you often find yourself in situations like this?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Not really. This was quite special because it was a big problem. Usually my work is more normal and I don’t need to think so fast.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Thankfully, not on a regular basis! That particular incident was rather exceptional in its intensity. However, I’d say that to varying degrees, working in event management does require a certain level of adaptability and on-the-spot problem-solving, though rarely with such high stakes involved.”

---

Question 2: What did you learn from that experience?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“I learned that I can work well under pressure. It also showed me that staying calm is important when there are problems.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“The key takeaway for me was that effective crisis management is less about having all the answers and more about maintaining composure and making decisive calls even with imperfect information. It also reinforced the importance of having robust backup plans and a team you can rely on implicitly. On a personal level, it gave me considerably more confidence in my ability to handle high-pressure scenarios.”

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Thời gian: 4-5 phút với 4-6 câu hỏi sâu và trừu tượng

Đặc điểm: Part 3 là phần thảo luận academic và abstract hơn nhiều so với Part 1 và 2. Examiner sẽ hỏi về những vấn đề rộng hơn liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2. Đây là phần khó nhất trong Speaking test.

Yêu cầu:

• Phân tích và evaluate: Không chỉ describe mà phải analyze, compare, give opinions với reasoning
• Quan điểm có depth: Cần demonstrate critical thinking
• Xem xét nhiều góc độ: Acknowledge complexity, đưa ra balanced view
• Examples từ society: Không chỉ personal examples mà cần broader examples từ xã hội, culture, history

Chiến lược:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời: Mỗi answer nên 3-5 câu minimum (30-45 giây)
• Sử dụng discourse markers: Well, Actually, To be honest, From my perspective…
• Structure rõ ràng: Direct answer → Reason/Explanation → Example → Additional point/Conclusion
• Tentative language: Dùng “I think”, “I would say”, “It seems to me” thay vì absolute statements
• Acknowledge complexity: “It depends”, “There are both advantages and disadvantages”, “It’s a complex issue”

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn, chỉ 1-2 câu
• Không có reasoning rõ ràng, chỉ state opinion không explain why
• Thiếu từ vựng abstract và academic
• Examples quá personal, không có societal perspective
• Không dare to express opinion, sợ sai
• Trả lời too definitive, không acknowledge các perspectives khác

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Decision-Making và Critical Thinking

---

Question 1: Do you think the ability to think quickly is more important than thinking carefully in today’s world?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Comparison + Opinion – yêu cầu so sánh 2 loại thinking và đưa ra stance
• Key words: “more important”, “today’s world” – cần contextualize với modern society
• Cách tiếp cận: Balanced view tốt hơn extreme opinion. Structure: acknowledge cả hai → explain context matters → give nuanced opinion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think both are important. Quick thinking is good for emergency situations when we need to make fast decisions. But careful thinking is better for important things like choosing a job or buying a house. In today’s world, we need both skills because life is very fast but we also need to be careful.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có basic comparison: quick thinking for emergencies, careful thinking for big decisions
• Vocabulary: Basic words: “good”, “better”, “important”, “fast”, “careful”
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicative với relevant points nhưng lacks depth và sophistication. Không có specific examples hay analysis sâu.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Well, I’d argue that it’s not really a matter of one being universally superior to the other; rather, it’s about context-appropriateness. In today’s fast-paced, hyper-connected world, there’s certainly a premium placed on agility and rapid response times – whether it’s in business environments where market windows can close quickly, or in our personal lives where we’re bombarded with decisions ranging from trivial to significant. However, what concerns me is the growing tendency to conflate speed with effectiveness.

The reality is more nuanced. While quick thinking is undeniably valuable in crisis situations or when dealing with time-sensitive opportunities, deliberate, careful analysis remains crucial for decisions with far-reaching consequences – things like strategic planning, complex problem-solving, or ethical dilemmas. What I think we actually need is metacognitive awareness – the ability to recognize which type of thinking a situation demands.

To illustrate this, consider the difference between a surgeon making split-second decisions during an emergency operation versus that same surgeon methodically planning a complex procedure weeks in advance. Both require high-level cognition, but the optimal thinking mode differs dramatically. In my view, the most successful individuals in today’s world are those who can flexibly switch between quick intuitive thinking and slow analytical thinking, depending on what the situation calls for.”

Phân tích:

• Structure:

  • Opening: Reject false dichotomy, state nuanced position
  • Body 1: Acknowledge importance of quick thinking in modern world
  • Body 2: Counter with importance of careful thinking
  • Body 3: Synthesis – metacognitive awareness
  • Example: Surgeon analogy
  • Conclusion: Flexibility is key

• Vocabulary:

  • Sophisticated: “context-appropriateness”, “premium placed on”, “conflate”, “far-reaching consequences”, “metacognitive awareness”, “optimal thinking mode”
  • Academic collocations: “hyper-connected world”, “rapid response times”, “time-sensitive opportunities”, “deliberate analysis”, “strategic planning”

• Grammar:

  • Complex conditional structures
  • Relative clauses: “individuals who can flexibly switch”
  • Contrast markers: “However”, “While”, “In my view”
  • Cleft sentences: “What concerns me is…”, “What I think we actually need is…”

• Critical Thinking:

  • Rejects binary thinking, offers nuanced perspective
  • Contextualizes with modern world
  • Provides concrete analogy (surgeon)
  • Demonstrates sophisticated understanding of cognition

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Well, I’d argue that”, “The reality is more nuanced”, “To illustrate this”, “In my view”
• Tentative language: “I’d argue”, “I think”, “In my view”, “tends to” (không absolute)
• Abstract nouns: “agility”, “effectiveness”, “metacognitive awareness”, “cognition”, “flexibility”
• Academic phrases: “it’s not a matter of”, “there’s a premium placed on”, “the optimal mode”, “depending on what the situation calls for”

---

Question 2: Why do you think some people are better at making quick decisions than others?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause/Reason – tìm factors giải thích differences
• Key words: “some people are better” – cần explain individual differences
• Cách tiếp cận: Multiple factors: nature (personality, brain), nurture (experience, training), context

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think some people are naturally good at quick thinking. Maybe they are born with this ability. Also, people who have more experience in their job can make faster decisions because they know what to do. Young people today might be better at quick decisions because they use technology a lot.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists 3 factors: natural ability, experience, technology exposure
• Vocabulary: Simple: “naturally good”, “born with”, “know what to do”
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Identifies relevant factors nhưng lacks detailed explanation và sophistication

---

📝 Câu trà lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“There are multiple interconnected factors that contribute to this variation, I believe. First and foremost, there’s definitely a personality dimension – some individuals are naturally more decisive and action-oriented, while others are more contemplative and analytical by temperament. Research in psychology suggests this partly relates to risk tolerance and cognitive processing styles.

Beyond innate traits, experience plays a pivotal role. People who regularly find themselves in high-pressure environments – whether that’s emergency room doctors, firefighters, or even experienced traders – develop what’s essentially a mental database of patterns and solutions. This allows them to recognize situations rapidly and draw on precedents, making what appears to be quick thinking but is actually pattern recognition honed through repetition.

There’s also a cultural component that’s often overlooked. In some cultures, decisiveness is highly valued and cultivated from an early age, whereas others might emphasize deliberation and consensus-building. Additionally, I’d say that confidence levels matter enormously – people who trust their judgment and aren’t paralyzed by fear of making mistakes are naturally going to be more comfortable with quick decisions.

Interestingly, modern neuroscience research suggests that the prefrontal cortex, which governs executive function and decision-making, can actually be strengthened through practice, much like a muscle. So to some extent, quick thinking is a trainable skill rather than purely an innate gift.”

Khả năng tư duy nhanh thể hiện rõ khi describe a person who is a great leader phải đưa ra quyết định quan trọng trong thời gian ngắn, điều này cũng cho thấy sự liên hệ chặt chẽ giữa khả năng lãnh đạo và tư duy nhanh nhạy.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized với multiple perspectives: personality → experience → culture → confidence → neuroscience
• Vocabulary: Academic và precise: “interconnected factors”, “temperament”, “risk tolerance”, “cognitive processing styles”, “pattern recognition”, “prefrontal cortex”, “executive function”
• Grammar: Complex sentences với multiple clauses, relative clauses, passive voice
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates breadth of knowledge (psychology, neuroscience, culture), acknowledges complexity

💡 Key Language Features:

• Linking ideas: “First and foremost”, “Beyond innate traits”, “Additionally”, “Interestingly”
• Academic references: “Research in psychology suggests”, “modern neuroscience research suggests”
• Hedging: “I believe”, “partly relates to”, “to some extent”
• Contrast: “while others”, “whereas others”

---

Theme 2: Modern Society and Decision-Making

Question 3: How has technology affected the way people make decisions nowadays?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause-Effect – technology as cause, changes in decision-making as effect
• Key words: “technology”, “nowadays” – cần specific về modern tech (smartphones, AI, social media)
• Cách tiếp cận: Balanced view – both positive impacts và negative impacts

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Technology has changed how we make decisions a lot. Now we can search for information on the internet very quickly, so we can make better decisions. For example, when we want to buy something, we can read reviews online. But sometimes technology makes us depend on it too much. We always check our phones before making decisions instead of thinking by ourselves.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Positive impact (access to information) → Negative impact (over-dependence)
• Vocabulary: Basic: “changed a lot”, “very quickly”, “better decisions”, “depend too much”
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses the question với relevant points nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Technology has fundamentally transformed our decision-making processes in both empowering and problematic ways. On the positive side, we now have unprecedented access to information at our fingertips. Within seconds, we can compare prices, read user reviews, consult expert opinions, and analyze data that would have taken days or weeks to gather a generation ago. This has democratized decision-making to some extent, making it less dependent on hierarchical expertise and more data-driven.

However, this abundance comes with significant drawbacks. What concerns me particularly is the phenomenon of decision fatigue. When we’re constantly bombarded with choices and information – from selecting what to watch on Netflix to choosing between dozens of nearly identical products on e-commerce platforms – our cognitive resources become depleted. Paradoxically, having more options and information can lead to analysis paralysis rather than better decisions.

Moreover, there’s the issue of algorithmic influence. Platforms like Google, Amazon, and social media don’t present information neutrally; they use algorithms to curate and filter what we see based on our past behavior. This creates echo chambers and confirmation bias, where we’re predominantly exposed to information that reinforces our existing beliefs, potentially narrowing rather than broadening our decision-making perspectives.

Another dimension is the shift toward instant gratification. Technology has accustomed us to immediate answers and quick solutions, which might be eroding our capacity for the kind of deep, contemplative thinking that complex decisions require. We’ve become less tolerant of ambiguity and more inclined to seek definitive answers quickly, even when situations warrant careful deliberation.

That said, I wouldn’t characterize technology’s impact as wholly negative. Tools like AI-powered decision support systems, predictive analytics, and collaborative platforms have enhanced decision-making in fields ranging from medicine to urban planning. The key, I believe, lies in developing digital literacy and metacognitive awareness – understanding when and how to leverage technology effectively while recognizing its limitations and potential biases.”

Phân tích:

• Structure:

  • Intro: Balanced thesis
  • Para 1: Positive impacts (access to information, democratization)
  • Para 2: Negative impact 1 (decision fatigue, analysis paralysis)
  • Para 3: Negative impact 2 (algorithmic influence, echo chambers)
  • Para 4: Negative impact 3 (instant gratification, erosion of deep thinking)
  • Conclusion: Balanced view, solution-oriented

• Vocabulary:

  • Sophisticated: “unprecedented access”, “democratized”, “hierarchical expertise”, “decision fatigue”, “analysis paralysis”, “algorithmic influence”, “echo chambers”, “confirmation bias”, “instant gratification”, “digital literacy”, “metacognitive awareness”
  • Academic collocations: “fundamentally transformed”, “cognitive resources”, “predominantly exposed to”, “warrant careful deliberation”

• Grammar:

  • Wide range: passive voice, relative clauses, participial phrases, conditional structures
  • Complex sentences với multiple dependent clauses

• Critical Thinking:

  • Comprehensive analysis covering multiple dimensions
  • Acknowledges both benefits và drawbacks
  • References to psychological concepts (decision fatigue, confirmation bias)
  • Solution-oriented conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

• Contrast markers: “However”, “Moreover”, “That said”
• Cautious language: “I wouldn’t characterize as wholly”, “to some extent”, “potentially”
• Abstract concepts: “democratization”, “analysis paralysis”, “echo chambers”, “digital literacy”
• Academic structures: “What concerns me particularly is…”, “The key lies in…”, “This creates…”

---

Theme 3: Education and Quick Thinking Skills

Question 4: Should schools teach students how to think quickly and make decisions under pressure?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Should – normative question về education policy
• Key words: “schools”, “teach”, “think quickly”, “under pressure”
• Cách tiếp cận: Take a clear stance nhưng acknowledge counterarguments. Discuss practical implementation.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think schools should teach this skill. In real life, students will face many situations where they need to make quick decisions. If they learn this at school, they will be more prepared for their future jobs. Schools can do activities like debates or group projects to help students practice quick thinking.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Direct yes → Reason (preparation for future) → Suggestion (debates, group projects)
• Vocabulary: Simple: “real life”, “face situations”, “more prepared”, “practice”
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear opinion với basic justification nhưng lacks depth và consideration of challenges

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Absolutely, and I’d argue this is becoming increasingly imperative in our rapidly changing world. However, the key caveat is that this should be done thoughtfully and in conjunction with teaching reflective, analytical thinking, not as a replacement for it.

The rationale is compelling. In today’s professional landscape, whether you’re in healthcare, business, education, or virtually any field, you’ll inevitably encounter situations demanding quick, sound judgment under pressure. By systematically exposing students to these scenarios in controlled, supportive environments, we can help them develop crucial competencies: emotional regulation under stress, rapid information processing, prioritization skills, and confidence in their decision-making abilities.

Practically speaking, this could be integrated through various pedagogical approaches. Simulation-based learning – where students face realistic scenarios with time constraints – has proven highly effective in fields like medicine and aviation, and could be adapted across subjects. Improvisational activities, timed problem-solving exercises, debate competitions, and even certain strategic games can all cultivate these skills. What’s crucial is that these activities are followed by structured reflection – students need to analyze their decision-making processes, understand what worked, what didn’t, and why.

However, we must be cautious not to create an educational culture that exclusively prizes speed over depth. There’s a real risk of inadvertently promoting superficial thinking if quick decision-making is emphasized without also teaching students when to slow down and engage in careful analysis. The goal should be developing cognitive flexibility – helping students recognize which situations demand rapid response and which require more contemplative approaches.

Additionally, schools need to consider the psychological dimension. Some students may find high-pressure scenarios deeply stressful, particularly those with anxiety or certain learning differences. Any curriculum incorporating pressure-based learning should also include robust support systems and teaching stress management techniques like mindfulness and cognitive reframing.

In essence, yes, schools should teach quick thinking under pressure, but as part of a holistic approach to decision-making that also emphasizes critical analysis, ethical reasoning, and emotional intelligence. The twenty-first-century student needs to be cognitively agile, capable of adapting their thinking style to whatever challenge they encounter.”

Phương pháp dạy kỹ năng tư duy nhanh và ra quyết định dưới áp lực trong trường học

Phân tích:

• Structure:

  • Clear stance với caveat
  • Rationale (why it’s important)
  • Practical implementation (how to do it)
  • Counterarguments và cautions
  • Psychological considerations
  • Holistic conclusion

• Vocabulary:

  • Academic: “imperative”, “key caveat”, “rationale is compelling”, “systematically exposing”, “crucial competencies”, “pedagogical approaches”, “cognitive flexibility”, “robust support systems”, “holistic approach”
  • Topic-specific: “simulation-based learning”, “improvisational activities”, “structured reflection”, “emotional regulation”, “cognitive reframing”

• Grammar:

  • Conditional structures
  • Passive voice: “could be integrated”, “has proven effective”, “should be done”
  • Complex noun phrases: “a holistic approach to decision-making that also emphasizes…”

• Critical Thinking:

  • Comprehensive analysis covering multiple angles
  • Practical implementation suggestions
  • Acknowledges potential pitfalls
  • Considers diverse student needs
  • Provides nuanced, balanced conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

• Strong opening: “Absolutely, and I’d argue this is becoming increasingly imperative”
• Qualifying language: “However, the key caveat”, “we must be cautious”, “there’s a real risk”
• Introducing examples: “Practically speaking”, “For instance”
• Emphasis structures: “What’s crucial is that”, “The goal should be”, “In essence”

---

Question 5: In what ways can people improve their ability to think quickly?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Solution/Methods – asking for practical ways
• Key words: “improve”, “ability to think quickly”
• Cách tiếp cận: Multiple strategies across different domains: practice, lifestyle, mindset

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“People can improve quick thinking by practicing more. They can do puzzles or brain games to make their brain faster. Also, reading books can help because it makes you think more. Staying healthy with exercise and good sleep is also important because your brain works better when your body is healthy.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists methods: practice, reading, health
• Vocabulary: Basic: “practicing more”, “make brain faster”, “works better”
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Relevant suggestions nhưng lacks specificity và sophistication

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“There are numerous evidence-based strategies for enhancing quick-thinking capabilities, spanning cognitive training, lifestyle factors, and psychological approaches.

From a cognitive training perspective, deliberate practice in time-constrained scenarios is paramount. This could involve anything from speed chess and strategic games that require rapid tactical decisions, to professional simulations relevant to one’s field. What’s critical is that these aren’t merely repetitive exercises but progressively challenging tasks that push individuals slightly beyond their comfort zone – what psychologists call the optimal learning zone. Mental math exercises, rapid reading techniques, and even certain video games designed for cognitive enhancement have shown promise in research.

Equally important are lifestyle factors that optimize brain function. Neuroplasticity research consistently demonstrates that regular physical exercise, particularly aerobic activity, significantly enhances cognitive processing speed and executive function. Quality sleep is non-negotiable – it’s during sleep that our brains consolidate learning and strengthen neural pathways. Nutrition also plays a role – diets rich in omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants, and complex carbohydrates support optimal cognitive performance.

From a psychological standpoint, developing stress management techniques is crucial. When we’re anxious, our prefrontal cortex – responsible for rational decision-making – becomes compromised as our amygdala takes over. Practices like mindfulness meditation, controlled breathing, and cognitive behavioral techniques can help individuals maintain composure under pressure, which is essential for effective quick thinking. Research shows that even brief mindfulness sessions can measurably improve decision-making speed and quality.

Another often-overlooked factor is building a robust knowledge base in your domain. Paradoxically, quick thinking often relies on slow, accumulated learning. Experts can think quickly in their field not because they’re inherently faster thinkers, but because they have extensive mental models and pattern libraries they can rapidly access. So deep, deliberate study in your area actually facilitates quicker thinking when situations arise.

Lastly, I’d emphasize the importance of reflective practice. After making decisions, particularly under pressure, taking time to analyze what worked, what didn’t, and why creates a feedback loop that accelerates improvement. This metacognitive approach – thinking about your thinking – helps you identify patterns in your decision-making and continuously refine your processes.”

Phân tích:

• Structure:

  • Intro: Overview của multiple strategies
  • Para 1: Cognitive training (practice methods)
  • Para 2: Lifestyle factors (exercise, sleep, nutrition)
  • Para 3: Psychological approaches (stress management, mindfulness)
  • Para 4: Knowledge building (domain expertise)
  • Para 5: Reflective practice (metacognition)

• Vocabulary:

  • Academic: “evidence-based strategies”, “cognitive training”, “deliberate practice”, “progressively challenging”, “optimal learning zone”, “neuroplasticity”, “executive function”, “neural pathways”, “robust knowledge base”, “metacognitive approach”
  • Scientific terms: “prefrontal cortex”, “amygdala”, “omega-3 fatty acids”, “aerobic activity”

• Grammar:

  • Range of structures: passive voice, relative clauses, participial phrases
  • Complex sentences with multiple clauses
  • Cause-effect relationships clearly expressed

• Critical Thinking:

  • Comprehensive coverage of multiple dimensions
  • References to research và psychology
  • Explains mechanisms (why methods work)
  • Acknowledges paradoxes (“paradoxically, quick thinking relies on slow learning”)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Academic register: “evidence-based”, “research demonstrates”, “studies show”
• Organizing language: “From a cognitive perspective”, “Equally important”, “Another often-overlooked factor”, “Lastly”
• Emphasis: “What’s critical is”, “is non-negotiable”, “is crucial”
• Hedging: “could involve”, “have shown promise”, “can help”

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
think on one’s feet	idiom	/θɪŋk ɒn wʌnz fiːt/	Suy nghĩ nhanh, phản ứng linh hoạt trong tình huống bất ngờ	You need to be able to think on your feet during live presentations.	quick thinking, rapid response, immediate reaction, mental agility
snap decision	n	/snæp dɪˈsɪʒən/	Quyết định nhanh, tức thì	I made a snap decision to change my flight when I heard about the storm.	make a snap decision, hasty choice, quick judgment, instant call
split-second decision	n	/splɪt ˈsekənd dɪˈsɪʒən/	Quyết định trong tích tắc	The driver had to make a split-second decision to avoid the accident.	crucial moment, instant judgment, rapid choice, quick call
gut instinct	n	/ɡʌt ˈɪnstɪŋkt/	Trực giác, linh cảm	I trusted my gut instinct and declined the offer.	trust your gut, follow your instinct, intuitive feeling, sixth sense
under pressure	prep phrase	/ˈʌndə ˈpreʃə/	Dưới áp lực	She performs well under pressure.	work under pressure, stay calm under pressure, handle pressure, cope with pressure
think quickly	v phrase	/θɪŋk ˈkwɪkli/	Suy nghĩ nhanh	You need to think quickly in emergency situations.	rapid thinking, quick response, fast reaction, swift decision
on the spot	idiom	/ɒn ðə spɒt/	Ngay tại chỗ, ngay lập tức	I had to answer the question on the spot without preparation.	immediate answer, instant response, right away, then and there
at a moment’s notice	idiom	/ət ə ˈməʊmənts ˈnəʊtɪs/	Trong chốc lát, ngay lập tức	He had to leave at a moment’s notice.	ready immediately, instant readiness, quick response, immediate action
crisis management	n	/ˈkraɪsɪs ˈmænɪdʒmənt/	Quản lý khủng hoảng	Good crisis management requires quick thinking.	handle crisis, manage emergency, crisis response, emergency management
problem-solving	n	/ˈprɒbləm ˈsɒlvɪŋ/	Giải quyết vấn đề	Problem-solving skills are essential in any job.	analytical skills, critical thinking, solution-oriented, troubleshooting
decisive	adj	/dɪˈsaɪsɪv/	Quyết đoán, dứt khoát	She’s very decisive when it comes to making business decisions.	decisive action, decisive moment, be decisive, decisive leadership
spontaneous	adj	/spɒnˈteɪniəs/	Tự phát, không chuẩn bị trước	His spontaneous response impressed everyone.	spontaneous reaction, spontaneous decision, act spontaneously, spontaneous behavior
time-sensitive	adj	/taɪm ˈsensətɪv/	Nhạy cảm về thời gian, cần xử lý ngay	This is a time-sensitive matter that requires immediate attention.	time-sensitive information, time-critical, urgent matter, deadline-driven
level-headed	adj	/ˌlevl ˈhedɪd/	Bình tĩnh, không hoảng loạn	You need to stay level-headed during emergencies.	remain level-headed, calm demeanor, composed attitude, keep cool
high-stakes	adj	/haɪ steɪks/	Có nhiều rủi ro, quan trọng	It was a high-stakes negotiation worth millions.	high-stakes decision, high-stakes situation, high-pressure, critical moment
nerve-wracking	adj	/nɜːv ˈrækɪŋ/	Căng thẳng, lo lắng	The interview was a nerve-wracking experience.	nerve-wracking situation, stressful experience, anxiety-inducing, tense moment
assess the situation	v phrase	/əˈses ðə ˌsɪtʃuˈeɪʃən/	Đánh giá tình huống	First, you need to assess the situation before taking action.	evaluate circumstances, analyze situation, size up, take stock
weigh up options	v phrase	/weɪ ʌp ˈɒpʃənz/	Cân nhắc các lựa chọn	I need time to weigh up my options carefully.	consider alternatives, evaluate choices, compare options, deliberate
step up to the plate	idiom	/step ʌp tə ðə pleɪt/	Chịu trách nhiệm, đảm nhận nhiệm vụ	When the manager resigned, Sarah had to step up to the plate.	take responsibility, rise to the occasion, take charge, assume responsibility

Tương tự như Describe a time when you were very inspired, việc kể về tình huống suy nghĩ nhanh cũng đòi hỏi khả năng diễn đạt cảm xúc và suy nghĩ nội tâm một cách chi tiết.

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
thrown into the deep end	Bị đẩy vào tình huống khó khăn không chuẩn bị	On my first day, I was thrown into the deep end and had to manage a client meeting alone.	7.5-9
baptism by fire	Thử thách khắc nghiệt ngay từ đầu	Managing that crisis was a real baptism by fire for me as a new manager.	8-9
rise to the occasion	Vượt qua thử thách, làm tốt trong tình huống khó	Despite her nervousness, she really rose to the occasion and delivered an excellent presentation.	7.5-9
grace under pressure	Sự điềm tĩnh dưới áp lực	His grace under pressure during the crisis earned him everyone’s respect.	8-9
hit the ground running	Bắt đầu làm việc hiệu quả ngay lập tức	The new manager hit the ground running and solved several problems in her first week.	7.5-8.5
keep a cool head	Giữ bình tĩnh	It’s important to keep a cool head when dealing with difficult customers.	7-8
racing against the clock	Chạy đua với thời gian	We were racing against the clock to finish the project before the deadline.	7.5-8.5
make or break moment	Thời điểm quyết định thành bại	The investor pitch was a make or break moment for our startup.	8-9
back against the wall	Trong tình thế bí, không còn lựa chọn	With our backs against the wall, we had to find a creative solution.	7.5-8.5
adrenaline pumping	Hưng phấn, phấn khích (do adrenaline)	With adrenaline pumping through my veins, I managed to handle the emergency.	7.5-8.5
in the heat of the moment	Trong lúc bị cuốn vào tình huống	In the heat of the moment, I said something I later regretted.	7-8
wing it	Ứng biến, làm mà không chuẩn bị	I forgot my notes, so I just had to wing it during the presentation.	7-7.5

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Khi cần suy nghĩ hoặc bắt đầu câu trả lời một cách tự nhiên
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc thông tin bất ngờ
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi nói thật lòng, thẳng thắn
• 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Từ góc nhìn của tôi
• 📝 In my experience,… – Dựa trên kinh nghiệm của tôi

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, hơn nữa
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, thêm vào đó
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến, chưa nói đến
• 📝 Additionally,… – Ngoài ra
• 📝 Furthermore,… – Hơn nữa
• 📝 Besides that,… – Bên cạnh đó

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác…
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng chúng ta cũng cần xem xét…
• 📝 That said,… – Nói như vậy thì… (để đưa ra ý đối lập)
• 📝 Having said that,… – Đã nói như vậy…
• 📝 However,… – Tuy nhiên
• 📝 Nevertheless,… – Tuy nhiên, dù sao đi nữa

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, nhìn chung
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, về cơ bản
• 📝 In essence,… – Về bản chất, về cơ bản
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng, rốt cuộc
• 📝 To sum up,… – Tóm lại

Để nhấn mạnh ý quan trọng:

• 📝 What’s crucial is that… – Điều quan trọng là…
• 📝 The key point is… – Điểm then chốt là…
• 📝 What really matters is… – Điều thực sự quan trọng là…
• 📝 What I find particularly interesting is… – Điều tôi thấy đặc biệt thú vị là…

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

• Mixed conditional: “If I hadn’t trusted my instincts, the outcome would be very different now.”

  • Kết hợp quá khứ và hiện tại để thể hiện hậu quả kéo dài

• Inversion (Đảo ngữ): “Had I known about the technical issue earlier, I would have prepared a backup plan.”

  • Formal structure, ấn tượng hơn “If I had known”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

• Non-defining: “My manager, who had been observing the situation, praised my quick thinking afterwards.”

  • Thêm thông tin mà không cần thiết cho ý chính

• Which referring to whole clause: “I managed to solve the problem in under 10 minutes, which surprised even myself.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

• It is thought/believed/said that… “It is widely believed that quick thinking can be developed through practice.”

  • Formal way để introduce opinions

• To be forced to: “I was forced to make a decision without all the information I needed.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

• What I find most… is… “What I find most challenging about quick thinking is maintaining composure under stress.”

  • Nhấn mạnh phần quan trọng

• The thing that… is… “The thing that helped me most in that situation was my previous training.”

• It was… that… “It was my colleague’s sudden absence that forced me to think on my feet.”

5. Participle Clauses:

• Present participle: “Realizing the urgency of the situation, I immediately took action.”

• Past participle: “Faced with no other options, I had to improvise.”

6. Inversion for Emphasis:

• Not only… but also… “Not only did I have to think quickly, but I also had to communicate my decision clearly to the team.”

• Rarely/Seldom: “Rarely have I encountered such a challenging situation.”

7. Subjunctive Mood:

• It is essential/crucial that… “It is essential that people develop the ability to think quickly in our fast-paced world.”

Khi Describe a time when you received constructive feedback, khả năng phản ứng và suy nghĩ nhanh về cách cải thiện bản thân cũng là một khía cạnh quan trọng của quick thinking.

---

Lời khuyên cuối cùng từ Examiner:

🎯 Về việc học từ vựng: Đừng chỉ học nghĩa tiếng Việt. Hãy học cả context sử dụng, collocations, và practice speaking với từ đó trong câu.

🎯 Về việc luyện tập: Record yourself trả lời các câu hỏi và nghe lại. Bạn sẽ tự nhận ra những điểm cần cải thiện.

🎯 Về band điểm: Đừng quá lo lắng về điểm số khi practice. Focus vào communication naturally và expressing your ideas clearly. Band score sẽ theo sau.

🎯 Về examples: Hãy prepare 2-3 real experiences có thể adapt cho nhiều topics khác nhau. Authenticity luôn tốt hơn memorized stories.

🎯 Về confidence: Examiner không expect perfect English. They’re assessing your ability to communicate effectively. Mistakes are okay if you can maintain fluency and get your message across.

Như describe a person you consider a role model, việc thể hiện những phẩm chất tích cực như khả năng tư duy nhanh và xử lý tình huống cũng giúp bạn tạo ấn tượng tốt với giám khảo về sự trưởng thành và tư duy phản biện.

Chúc bạn tự tin và thành công trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking!