Chủ đề “Describe A Time When You Gave Advice To A Friend” là một trong những đề bài phổ biến trong IELTS Speaking Part 2, xuất hiện thường xuyên từ năm 2020 đến nay với tần suất trung bình cao. Đây là dạng câu hỏi về trải nghiệm cá nhân, yêu cầu thí sinh kể về một lần họ đưa ra lời khuyên cho bạn bè, điều này hoàn toàn gần gũi với cuộc sống hàng ngày của chúng ta.
Chủ đề này thường xuất hiện cùng với các biến thể như “describe a piece of advice you gave someone”, “describe a time you helped a friend with a problem”, hoặc “describe a suggestion you made to someone”. Khả năng xuất hiện trong các kỳ thi tương lai được đánh giá ở mức cao do tính thực tế và khả năng đánh giá toàn diện các kỹ năng của thí sinh.
Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được:
- Câu hỏi thường gặp trong cả 3 Part liên quan đến chủ đề advice và friendship
- Bài mẫu chi tiết theo ba mức band điểm 6-7, 7.5-8, và 8.5-9 với phân tích sâu
- Hơn 50 từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm đặc thù cho chủ đề
- Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của examiner
- Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục
- Kỹ thuật mở rộng ý tưởng và tăng độ trôi chảy
IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview
Tổng Quan Về Part 1
Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về đời sống hàng ngày. Đặc điểm của phần này là câu hỏi đơn giản, quen thuộc, giúp thí sinh làm quen với không khí thi. Chiến lược tối ưu là trả lời tự nhiên, mở rộng mỗi câu trả lời thành 2-3 câu với cấu trúc: Direct answer – Reason/Example – Additional detail.
Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam trong Part 1:
- Trả lời quá ngắn gọn, chỉ Yes/No hoặc một từ
- Sử dụng từ vựng đơn giản, lặp đi lặp lại
- Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
- Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm do lo lắng
- Không duy trì eye contact với examiner
Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp
Question 1: Do you often ask your friends for advice?
Question 2: What kind of advice do you usually give to your friends?
Question 3: Do you prefer to get advice from friends or family members?
Question 4: Have you ever received bad advice from someone?
Question 5: Do you think it’s easy to give good advice?
Question 6: When was the last time you asked someone for advice?
Question 7: Do you think young people should listen to advice from older people?
Question 8: Is it important to follow the advice you receive?
Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết
Question: Do you often ask your friends for advice?
🎯 Cách tiếp cận:
- Trả lời trực tiếp có hay không
- Giải thích lý do tại sao
- Đưa ra ví dụ cụ thể về loại advice thường hỏi
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“Yes, I do ask my friends for advice quite often. They understand me well and can give me good suggestions. For example, when I have problems with my studies, I usually talk to my close friends about it.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh: Trả lời rõ ràng, có ví dụ, sử dụng liên từ “for example”
- Hạn chế: Từ vựng đơn giản (good, problems, talk), thiếu depth trong giải thích
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Đủ thông tin cơ bản nhưng chưa impressive về mặt ngôn ngữ và ý tưởng
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“Yes, I frequently turn to my close friends for advice, especially when I’m facing a dilemma about career choices or personal relationships. I find that they can offer a fresh perspective because they know my personality and values well. Just last month, I sought their input on whether I should pursue further studies or start working, and their insights were genuinely helpful.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng collocations tự nhiên (turn to, facing a dilemma, fresh perspective, sought their input), ví dụ cụ thể với thời gian rõ ràng (last month), demonstrate vocabulary range
- Tại sao Band 8-9:
- Fluency: Câu trả lời tự nhiên, không hesitation
- Vocabulary: Precise word choices (dilemma thay vì problem, insights thay vì ideas)
- Grammar: Variety of structures (when clause, because clause)
- Content: Specific and detailed với real-life context
💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:
- turn to someone: nhờ đến ai đó, tìm đến ai đó để được giúp đỡ
- face a dilemma: đối mặt với tình thế tiến thoái lưỡng nan
- fresh perspective: góc nhìn mới mẻ
- seek input: tìm kiếm ý kiến đóng góp
- insights: những hiểu biết sâu sắc, nhận thức
Question: What kind of advice do you usually give to your friends?
🎯 Cách tiếp cận:
- Nêu loại lời khuyên cụ thể
- Giải thích tại sao bạn có thể đưa ra advice đó
- Có thể đưa ví dụ ngắn
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“I usually give advice about study methods because I’m quite good at organizing my study time. My friends often ask me how to prepare for exams. Sometimes I also give advice about relationships when they have arguments with their family.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh: Có specific topics (study methods, relationships), có reason
- Hạn chế: Grammar có lỗi nhỏ (arguments with family – nên dùng disagreements), từ vựng basic
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicate ý tưởng rõ ràng nhưng language chưa sophisticated
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“I tend to specialize in giving advice related to time management and study strategies, as I’ve always been fairly disciplined in this area. Friends often consult me about how to balance their academic workload with extracurricular activities. Occasionally, I also weigh in on personal matters, though I’m careful to only offer constructive suggestions rather than being prescriptive about what they should do.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh:
- Vocabulary range cao (specialize in, disciplined, consult, weigh in on, constructive, prescriptive)
- Show awareness về boundaries khi give advice
- Natural flow với discourse markers (as, though)
- Tại sao Band 8-9:
- Fluency: Well-organized với clear progression of ideas
- Vocabulary: Topic-specific terms được sử dụng chính xác
- Grammar: Complex sentences với subordinate clauses
- Depth: Show thoughtfulness và maturity trong approach
💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:
- specialize in: chuyên về, giỏi về
- time management: quản lý thời gian
- disciplined: có kỷ luật, nghiêm túc
- consult someone: tham khảo ý kiến ai đó
- weigh in on: đưa ra ý kiến về vấn đề gì
- constructive suggestions: gợi ý mang tính xây dựng
- prescriptive: mang tính áp đặt
Học viên đang trả lời câu hỏi IELTS Speaking Part 1 về chủ đề đưa lời khuyên cho bạn bè
Question: Do you think it’s easy to give good advice?
🎯 Cách tiếp cận:
- Đưa ra opinion (yes/no/depends)
- Explain why với reasons
- Consider different perspectives nếu có thể
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“I think it’s not easy to give good advice. You need to understand the person’s situation very well. Also, you should have experience about the problem. If you give wrong advice, it can make the situation worse.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh: Clear opinion, có reasons, show consequence awareness
- Hạn chế: Basic vocabulary (very well, wrong advice, worse), simple sentence structures
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Ideas are clear but language is not advanced
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:
“I’d say it’s considerably challenging to give truly valuable advice. It requires not just empathy and understanding of the person’s circumstances, but also the wisdom to know when to speak and when to simply listen. What makes it even more complex is that advice needs to be tailored to each individual’s personality and situation – what works for one person might be completely inappropriate for another. I think the best advice-givers are those who can put themselves in others’ shoes while maintaining enough objectivity to see the bigger picture.”
Phân tích:
- Điểm mạnh:
- Nuanced opinion (considerably challenging – not just “difficult”)
- Multiple dimensions discussed (empathy, timing, personalization)
- Abstract vocabulary (wisdom, objectivity, circumstances)
- Natural idiom (put themselves in others’ shoes)
- Tại sao Band 8-9:
- Fluency: Sophisticated discourse markers (not just, even more, while)
- Vocabulary: Precise and academic (tailored, inappropriate, objectivity)
- Grammar: Complex structures with relative clauses and participial phrases
- Critical thinking: Shows depth of thought về complexity của giving advice
💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:
- considerably challenging: đáng kể khó khăn
- empathy: sự đồng cảm, khả năng thấu hiểu
- wisdom: trí tuệ, sự khôn ngoan
- tailored: được điều chỉnh phù hợp, được cá nhân hóa
- inappropriate: không phù hợp
- put oneself in others’ shoes: đặt mình vào vị trí người khác
- objectivity: tính khách quan
IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)
Tổng Quan Về Part 2
Part 2 là phần độc thoại kéo dài 2-3 phút, trong đó bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị. Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để demonstrate khả năng nói liền mạch và organize ideas. Đặc điểm của Part 2 là bạn phải nói không bị ngắt, covering tất cả bullet points trong cue card.
Chiến lược hiệu quả:
- Sử dụng đầy đủ 1 phút chuẩn bị để note keywords (không viết câu hoàn chỉnh)
- Structure notes theo thứ tự bullet points
- Nói ít nhất 1.5-2 phút (tối đa 3 phút)
- Sử dụng thì quá khứ cho dạng “describe a time”
- Dành thời gian nhiều nhất cho bullet point cuối (explain)
Lỗi thường gặp:
- Waste time chuẩn bị, viết quá nhiều
- Nói dưới 1.5 phút hoặc chạy quá 3 phút
- Bỏ sót bullet points, đặc biệt là “explain”
- Không organize logically, nhảy lung tung giữa các ý
- Dùng quá nhiều filler words (uhm, like, you know)
Cue Card
Describe a time when you gave advice to a friend
You should say:
- When it was
- What advice you gave
- Why your friend needed this advice
- And explain how you felt about giving this advice
Phân Tích Đề Bài
- Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an experience/event – kể về một trải nghiệm cụ thể trong quá khứ
- Thì động từ: Quá khứ đơn và quá khứ tiếp diễn chủ yếu (was, gave, needed, felt)
- Bullet points phải cover:
- When: Cần nêu rõ timeframe (tháng/năm hoặc giai đoạn cụ thể)
- What advice: Nội dung lời khuyên chi tiết, không chung chung
- Why friend needed: Context và situation của bạn – vấn đề họ đang gặp phải
- Explain feelings: Đây là phần quan trọng nhất để ghi điểm cao – cảm xúc, thoughts, reflection
- Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần explain chiếm 30-40% thời gian nói, đây là nơi demonstrate emotional vocabulary, reflection, và show maturity trong thinking
Tương tự như describe a difficult challenge you overcame, chủ đề này cũng yêu cầu kể về một sự kiện cụ thể với nhiều chi tiết mô tả.
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7
Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút
“I’d like to talk about a time when I gave advice to my best friend, Nam. This happened about six months ago when we were in our final year at university.
Nam came to me because he was feeling confused about his future career. He had two job offers – one from a big company in Hanoi with a high salary, and another from a smaller startup company in our hometown. He didn’t know which one to choose.
I listened to him carefully and asked him many questions about what he really wanted in life. Then I gave him advice to make a list of pros and cons for each job. I also suggested that he should think about his family situation because his parents were getting old. I told him that money is important but job satisfaction and work-life balance are also very important.
In the end, I advised him to choose the job in our hometown because he would be closer to his family and have less stress. The salary was lower but the working environment seemed better for him.
I felt quite nervous when giving this advice because it was a big decision for his life. I was worried that if he followed my advice and it turned out badly, he might blame me. But I also felt happy that he trusted me enough to ask for my opinion. After he made his decision and started the job, he told me he was satisfied with his choice, which made me feel relieved and proud that I could help my friend.”
Phân Tích Band Điểm
| Tiêu chí | Band | Nhận xét |
|---|---|---|
| Fluency & Coherence | 6-7 | Có sequencing rõ ràng, sử dụng time markers (six months ago, in the end), nhưng còn hesitation với một số linking words đơn giản |
| Lexical Resource | 6-7 | Vocabulary adequate (feeling confused, job satisfaction, work-life balance) nhưng mostly common words, chưa có idioms hay collocations cao cấp |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 6-7 | Mix của simple và complex sentences, có một số subordinate clauses (because, when), nhưng patterns còn repetitive |
| Pronunciation | 6-7 | Clear và understandable, stress patterns cơ bản đúng |
Điểm mạnh:
- ✅ Cover đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
- ✅ Story có structure logic: context → problem → advice → result → feelings
- ✅ Có specific details (two job offers, hometown vs Hanoi)
- ✅ Thì động từ sử dụng đúng (past tense)
Hạn chế:
- ⚠️ Vocabulary còn basic (happy, nervous, worried)
- ⚠️ Thiếu descriptive language cho feelings và situation
- ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đa dạng (nhiều simple sentences với I + verb)
📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8
Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút
“I’d like to share a memorable experience when I offered some guidance to my close friend, Linh. This took place roughly eight months ago, during our final semester at university when the pressure of post-graduation planning was mounting.
Linh approached me in quite a distressed state. She had been offered a place in a prestigious master’s program abroad, which had been her dream for years. However, she was torn between accepting it and staying in Vietnam to be with her boyfriend, whom she’d been dating for three years. The relationship was serious, but he couldn’t relocate due to family obligations.
I remember we sat down over coffee and I listened to her pour her heart out for nearly an hour. Rather than jumping straight in with my opinion, I asked her thought-provoking questions about her long-term aspirations and what she might regret more in the future. I suggested she consider that at 22, personal growth and career development could actually strengthen a relationship rather than threaten it. I also gently reminded her that if the relationship was truly strong, it could withstand the temporary distance.
My main advice was to follow her dreams while maintaining the relationship long-distance, emphasizing that sacrificing such a significant opportunity might lead to resentment later on. I encouraged her to have an honest conversation with her boyfriend about supporting each other’s goals.
Looking back, I felt a mixture of emotions about giving this advice. On one hand, I felt honored that she trusted me with such a personal dilemma. On the other hand, I was somewhat anxious because I knew my words could significantly influence her life path. What made me most apprehensive was the possibility that things might not work out and she might second-guess her decision. However, I ultimately felt it was important to speak candidly because that’s what true friendship demands. The experience taught me that giving advice isn’t about dictating what someone should do, but rather helping them clarify their own values and priorities.”
Phân Tích Band Điểm
| Tiêu chí | Band | Nhận xét |
|---|---|---|
| Fluency & Coherence | 7.5-8 | Smooth flow với sophisticated linking (however, rather than, while), logical progression, minimal hesitation |
| Lexical Resource | 7.5-8 | Wide range với collocations (mounting pressure, torn between, pour her heart out, thought-provoking, withstand distance), some less common vocabulary (apprehensive, resentment, candidly) |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 7.5-8 | Variety of complex structures (relative clauses, conditional-like phrases, participial phrases), mostly error-free |
| Pronunciation | 7.5-8 | Clear articulation với appropriate stress và intonation patterns |
So Sánh Với Band 6-7
| Khía cạnh | Band 6-7 | Band 7.5-8 |
|---|---|---|
| Vocabulary | “feeling confused”, “happy”, “nervous” | “distressed state”, “torn between”, “honored”, “apprehensive” |
| Grammar | “He didn’t know which one to choose” (simple) | “She was torn between accepting it and staying” (complex with gerunds) |
| Ideas | Basic explanation of advice | Deeper reflection với philosophical element về friendship và decision-making |
| Details | General situation | Specific context (master’s program, 3-year relationship, age 22) |
Hai người bạn đang thảo luận nghiêm túc về quyết định nghề nghiệp trong quán cà phê
📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9
Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ
“I’d like to recount a particularly poignant experience when I found myself in the position of counseling my childhood friend, Mai, through what was arguably one of the most pivotal decisions of her life. This occurred approximately ten months ago, right at the cusp of our transition from university life to the professional world.
Mai came to me in an emotionally fraught state, grappling with a decision that had been weighing heavily on her mind for weeks. She’d been accepted into a highly competitive graduate program in Singapore, offering an excellent scholarship package and unparalleled opportunities for her field – environmental engineering. However, this golden opportunity came with a significant personal cost: her mother had recently been diagnosed with a chronic illness requiring ongoing treatment, and Mai was torn apart by the prospect of leaving her family during such a critical juncture.
What made this situation particularly complex was that there were no clear-cut answers. I knew I had to tread carefully, as this wasn’t merely about career versus family – it was about her self-identity, filial obligations, and long-term wellbeing. We spent an entire afternoon at a quiet café, and I consciously adopted more of a facilitator role rather than an advice-giver. I asked her to envision two scenarios: one where she stayed and one where she left, and to articulate not just the practical implications but also the emotional landscape of each choice five years down the line.
The crux of my counsel was helping her recognize that these options weren’t mutually exclusive. I suggested she have a candid dialogue with her family about their concerns and capabilities, and explore whether a compromise was possible – perhaps starting the program with plans for frequent visits home, or deferring for a semester to ensure her mother’s treatment plan was well-established. I emphasized that genuine caregiving isn’t about physical proximity alone, but about quality support, and that becoming the best version of herself professionally could ultimately enable her to provide better for her family in the long run.
Reflecting on this experience, I was struck by the profound responsibility that comes with giving advice about life-altering decisions. I felt simultaneously humbled and somewhat daunted – humbled that Mai valued my perspective enough to seek it out, yet daunted by the potential ramifications of steering her in any particular direction. What resonated most deeply was the realization that the most valuable advice often isn’t about prescribing a course of action, but rather about helping someone navigate their own internal compass and providing them with a framework to make decisions aligned with their core values.
The experience was ultimately deeply gratifying, particularly when Mai later told me that our conversation had helped her find the clarity she needed. She decided to defer for six months, ensuring her mother’s treatment was on track, and then pursued the program with her family’s full blessing. This affirmed my belief that good advice isn’t about having all the answers, but about empowering others to discover their own authentic path. It taught me that true friendship sometimes means holding space for someone’s uncertainty rather than rushing to eliminate it, and that the most impactful guidance often comes from asking the right questions rather than providing ready-made solutions.”
Phân Tích Band Điểm
| Tiêu chí | Band | Nhận xét |
|---|---|---|
| Fluency & Coherence | 8.5-9 | Exceptional flow với sophisticated discourse markers (however, what made this particularly, the crux of, reflecting on), perfectly sequenced ideas, completely natural delivery |
| Lexical Resource | 8.5-9 | Wide-ranging với precise usage, natural collocations (weighing heavily on her mind, tread carefully, mutually exclusive, internal compass), idiomatic expressions, abstract nouns |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 8.5-9 | Full range of structures với flexibility (participial phrases, inverted structures, complex conditionals, relative clauses), virtually error-free |
| Pronunciation | 8.5-9 | Fully comprehensible với appropriate features throughout (stress, intonation, rhythm) |
Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc
🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
- Speech flows effortlessly với natural pausing at appropriate points
- No memorized chunks – sounds genuinely spontaneous
- Sophisticated signposting (I’d like to recount, What made this particularly complex, The crux of my counsel)
📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:
- “at the cusp of” – thời điểm bước ngoặt (thay vì “at the time of”)
- “emotionally fraught” – đầy căng thẳng cảm xúc (thay vì “very emotional”)
- “weighing heavily on her mind” – collocation tự nhiên cho “worry”
- “tread carefully” – metaphorical language cho “be careful”
- “internal compass” – metaphor sophisticated cho personal values
- “holding space” – contemporary expression về emotional support
📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:
- Participial phrases: “offering an excellent scholarship package”, “ensuring her mother’s treatment was on track”
- Relative clauses: “a decision that had been weighing heavily on her mind”
- It-cleft structures: “It taught me that true friendship…”
- Passive voice: “She’d been accepted”, “couldn’t be eliminated”
- Complex conditionals: “where she stayed and one where she left”
💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
- Không chỉ describe sự việc mà còn analyze psychological complexity
- Show maturity trong understanding về nuance của giving advice
- Reflect về broader life lessons learned
- Demonstrate empathy và emotional intelligence
- Connect personal experience to universal truths về friendship
Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)
Examiner thường hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau khi bạn kết thúc Part 2 để transition sang Part 3:
Question 1: Did your friend follow your advice in the end?
Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, she did. She decided to defer the program for six months and then went to Singapore. She’s doing well there now.”
Band 8-9 Answer:
“Yes, she ultimately took my counsel on board and opted for the deferred entry route. It turned out to be the right decision – she was able to ensure her mother’s treatment was well-managed before departing, and she’s now thriving in Singapore with peace of mind about her family situation.”
Question 2: Would you give advice to friends in a similar situation again?
Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, definitely. I think it’s important to help friends when they need advice. But I would be careful not to force my opinion on them.”
Band 8-9 Answer:
“Absolutely, though this experience has refined my approach. I’ve learned to strike a balance between offering meaningful input and respecting someone’s autonomy to make their own choices. I think the key is to help people access their own wisdom rather than imposing my perspective, however well-intentioned it might be.”
IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion
Tổng Quan Về Part 3
Part 3 kéo dài 4-5 phút và là phần trừu tượng nhất, yêu cầu thảo luận về những vấn đề rộng hơn liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2. Đặc điểm của Part 3 là câu hỏi mang tính phân tích, đánh giá, so sánh, dự đoán xu hướng – không còn là personal experience nữa mà là societal perspectives.
Yêu cầu:
- Phân tích vấn đề từ nhiều góc độ (social, cultural, economic)
- Đưa ra quan điểm có lý lẽ rõ ràng
- Support ideas với examples từ society, không chỉ bản thân
- Acknowledge complexity và different perspectives
Chiến lược:
- Mở rộng mỗi câu trả lời 3-5 câu (30-45 giây)
- Structure: Direct answer → Reason 1 + example → Reason 2 + example → Conclusion/Balanced view
- Sử dụng discourse markers (Well, Actually, To be honest, I’d say that)
- Thừa nhận uncertainty khi appropriate (I’m not entirely sure, but…)
Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:
- Trả lời quá ngắn, không elaborate
- Chỉ nói về personal experience thay vì general trends
- Thiếu từ vựng abstract/academic
- Không show critical thinking
- Give opinion quá absolute, không nuanced
Thí sinh IELTS đang trả lời phần Part 3 với sự tự tin và chuyên nghiệp
Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu
Theme 1: The Nature and Impact of Advice
Question 1: Why do people sometimes ignore good advice?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Cause analysis (Why do people…)
- Key words: ignore, good advice
- Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple reasons, explain psychology behind each, possibly give examples
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“I think there are several reasons why people don’t follow good advice. First, sometimes people have too much pride and don’t want to admit that others know better than them. Second, the advice might be difficult to follow, so even though they know it’s good, they choose the easier way. Also, some people are just stubborn and want to learn from their own mistakes instead of listening to others.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Clear với “First, Second, Also”
- Vocabulary: Basic (too much pride, easier way, stubborn)
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Ideas are relevant nhưng explanation thiếu depth, vocabulary chưa sophisticated
📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:
“Well, I think there are several nuanced reasons behind this phenomenon. Primarily, people often have an inherent resistance to advice that challenges their existing beliefs or identity – psychologically, accepting guidance can feel like admitting defeat or acknowledging one’s own shortcomings, which can be quite uncomfortable for the ego.
Additionally, there’s often a disconnect between rational understanding and emotional readiness. Someone might intellectually recognize that advice is sound, but emotionally they’re not prepared to make the changes it requires. For instance, a person might know they should leave a toxic relationship, but the fear of loneliness or the comfort of familiarity can override logical thinking.
Furthermore, I’d say the timing plays a crucial role. Premature advice, even when well-intentioned, might be rejected simply because the person hasn’t reached a point where they’re receptive to it. Sometimes people need to go through their own journey and come to realizations themselves. As the saying goes, ‘you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink’ – ultimately, transformation has to come from within.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Well-organized với clear signposting (Primarily, Additionally, Furthermore)
- Vocabulary: Sophisticated (inherent resistance, disconnect, rational vs emotional, premature, receptive)
- Grammar: Complex structures (accepting guidance can feel like admitting defeat, they’re not prepared to make the changes it requires)
- Critical Thinking: Shows psychological understanding, provides specific example, uses idiomatic expression naturally, acknowledges complexity
💡 Key Language Features:
- Discourse markers: Well, Primarily, Additionally, Furthermore
- Tentative language: I think, I’d say, might be, can be
- Abstract nouns: resistance, disconnect, readiness, shortcomings, transformation
- Academic collocations: inherent resistance, rational understanding, emotional readiness
Question 2: Is advice from older people always more valuable than advice from peers?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Evaluate/Compare (Is…always…)
- Key words: older people, peers, always, valuable
- Cách tiếp cận: Avoid absolute answer, show balanced view, compare advantages của both
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“I don’t think advice from older people is always better. Older people have more experience, so their advice can be very useful for life decisions. However, friends of the same age understand our situation better because they are going through similar things. So both types of advice have value depending on the situation.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Shows balanced view
- Vocabulary: Simple (more experience, useful, understand better)
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Ideas are clear nhưng lack elaboration và specific examples
📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:
“I’d have to say it’s not quite as straightforward as that. While it’s true that older generations bring invaluable life experience and wisdom accumulated over decades, the value of advice really depends on the context and nature of the problem at hand.
On the one hand, advice from elders is particularly pertinent when it comes to time-tested wisdom about enduring human experiences – relationships, career longevity, financial prudence, for instance. They’ve weathered various economic cycles and social changes, giving them a broader perspective on what truly matters in the long run. Their counsel often helps us avoid pitfalls they’ve already encountered.
On the other hand, peer advice has its own distinct advantages, especially in our rapidly evolving world. Friends of the same generation are navigating the same contemporary challenges – whether it’s adapting to new technologies, dealing with modern workplace dynamics, or understanding current social norms. They’re more likely to offer advice that’s contextually relevant and immediately applicable to our present circumstances. For example, when it comes to social media presence or digital career opportunities, younger advisors might actually be more attuned to the nuances than older generations.
Ultimately, I believe the most prudent approach is to draw from both sources – leveraging the strategic wisdom of elders while also considering the tactical insights of peers who understand the current landscape. The key is to be discerning and recognize which type of advice is most appropriate for each specific situation.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Sophisticated với clear framework (While… On the one hand… On the other hand… Ultimately)
- Vocabulary: Wide-ranging (invaluable, pertinent, weathered, navigating, attuned, nuances, discerning)
- Grammar: Complex sentences với subordinate clauses, parallel structures
- Critical Thinking: Nuanced view, acknowledges validity của both sides, provides specific examples, offers balanced conclusion
💡 Key Language Features:
- Discourse markers: While, On the one hand, On the other hand, Ultimately
- Tentative language: I’d have to say, I believe, might actually be
- Academic verbs: accumulated, navigating, adapting to, leveraging, draw from
- Contrast structures: While it’s true that… / On the one hand… On the other hand…
Nếu bạn quan tâm đến cách phát triển kỹ năng trong các tình huống khác, describe a skill that you are proud of cũng là một chủ đề liên quan đến việc phát triển bản thân thông qua học hỏi và lời khuyên.
Question 3: How has the way people seek advice changed with the development of technology?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Change/Trend (How has…changed)
- Key words: seek advice, technology, changed
- Cách tiếp cận: Compare past vs present, identify key changes, evaluate impact (positive/negative)
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“Technology has changed how people get advice a lot. In the past, people could only ask their family or friends face-to-face. Now, people can search for advice on the internet or ask questions in online forums. They can also watch YouTube videos or read blogs about any topic. This is more convenient but sometimes the advice online is not reliable.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Past-present comparison
- Vocabulary: Basic (a lot, convenient, reliable)
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points nhưng lacks sophistication và detailed analysis
📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:
“The advent of technology has fundamentally transformed the landscape of advice-seeking in several profound ways. Gone are the days when people were limited to their immediate social circle – now we have unprecedented access to a vast array of perspectives from around the globe.
Perhaps most significantly, technology has democratized access to expertise. Through platforms like online forums, social media groups, and specialized apps, individuals can now tap into specialized knowledge that was previously confined to professional consultations. For instance, someone grappling with a medical concern can access peer experiences and even get preliminary guidance through telemedicine platforms before seeing a doctor. This has been particularly empowering for people in remote areas or those with limited resources.
However, this proliferation of digital advice comes with significant caveats. The anonymity and lack of accountability online mean that distinguishing between credible and dubious advice has become increasingly challenging. We’re now inundated with often contradictory information, which can be overwhelming rather than helpful. Moreover, the algorithmic filtering of content can create echo chambers where people only encounter advice that reinforces their existing views, rather than challenging them constructively.
Another notable shift is the immediacy of advice-seeking. Where previously people might have taken time to reflect before consulting others, now there’s an expectation of instant responses. While this speed can be beneficial in urgent situations, it may also discourage the kind of deep contemplation that often precedes wise decision-making.
All things considered, technology has made advice more accessible and diverse, but it’s also placed greater responsibility on individuals to be critical consumers of information, weighing the credibility of sources rather than simply absorbing whatever appears on their screens.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Multi-dimensional analysis (access, quality concerns, speed, conclusion)
- Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated (advent, democratized, proliferation, caveats, inundated, echo chambers)
- Grammar: Complex structures với participles, relative clauses, passive constructions
- Critical Thinking: Shows balanced evaluation, acknowledges both benefits và drawbacks, provides specific examples, offers nuanced conclusion
💡 Key Language Features:
- Discourse markers: Perhaps most significantly, However, Moreover, Another notable shift, All things considered
- Change vocabulary: transformed, gone are the days, shift, unprecedented
- Evaluation language: profound, significant, particularly empowering, challenging, overwhelming
Theme 2: Cultural and Generational Perspectives on Advice
Question 4: Do you think people from different cultures have different attitudes toward giving and receiving advice?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Opinion + Cultural comparison
- Key words: different cultures, attitudes, giving and receiving advice
- Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge cultural variations, provide examples, explain underlying values
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“Yes, I think culture affects how people give and receive advice. In Asian cultures like Vietnam, older people’s advice is very respected because of Confucian values. People usually listen to their parents and grandparents. But in Western cultures, people are more independent and might not always follow family advice. They prefer to make their own decisions.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Clear comparison between Asian and Western
- Vocabulary: Basic (respected, independent, prefer)
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Makes valid cultural points nhưng explanation lacks depth và nuance
📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:
“Absolutely, cultural background plays a pivotal role in shaping attitudes toward advice, and these differences can be quite striking. The variations often stem from fundamental cultural values around individualism versus collectivism, hierarchy, and the role of community in decision-making.
In many collectivist societies, particularly in Asia, there’s a strong cultural emphasis on seeking counsel from elders and deferring to their wisdom. This is deeply rooted in Confucian principles that prioritize filial piety and respect for hierarchical relationships. Soliciting advice isn’t just practical – it’s also a way of honoring social bonds and showing respect. People might feel obligated to at least appear to consider advice from family elders, even if they ultimately make their own choice. Refusing or dismissing such guidance could be seen as disrespectful or even transgressive.
Conversely, in more individualistic Western contexts, there’s greater emphasis on personal autonomy and self-determination. While advice is still valued, there’s less stigma attached to disregarding it in favor of one’s own judgment. The cultural narrative celebrates the self-made individual who charts their own course. Unsolicited advice might even be perceived as intrusive or presumptuous in some situations.
Interestingly, these attitudes also manifest differently in communication styles. In high-context cultures, advice might be given more indirectly through stories or subtle suggestions, whereas low-context cultures tend toward more direct, explicit guidance. For example, a Vietnamese parent might share a parable to convey wisdom, while a Western parent might give straightforward instructions.
It’s worth noting that these are generalizations and individual attitudes vary widely within any culture, especially with globalization blurring traditional cultural boundaries. Younger generations in traditionally hierarchical societies are increasingly embracing more autonomous decision-making, while communal values are being rediscovered in some Western contexts as people seek stronger support networks.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Comprehensive với clear contrast, multiple dimensions explored
- Vocabulary: Sophisticated cultural terminology (collectivist, individualistic, filial piety, high-context, transgressive)
- Grammar: Complex structures với nominalizations and relative clauses
- Critical Thinking: Shows deep cultural understanding, acknowledges complexity, mentions changing dynamics, avoids stereotyping
💡 Key Language Features:
- Discourse markers: Absolutely, Conversely, Interestingly, It’s worth noting
- Cultural vocabulary: collectivist, individualism, hierarchy, filial piety, autonomy
- Hedging language: often stem from, might feel, could be seen as, tend toward
- Academic expressions: plays a pivotal role, deeply rooted in, it’s worth noting
Để hiểu thêm về cách các yếu tố văn hóa ảnh hưởng đến giao tiếp, bạn có thể tham khảo describe a memorable conversation you had để thấy được sự đa dạng trong phong cách trò chuyện.
Theme 3: The Psychology and Effectiveness of Advice
Question 5: What qualities make someone good at giving advice?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Characteristics/Qualities
- Key words: qualities, good at giving advice
- Cách tiếp cận: List multiple qualities, explain why each is important, possibly prioritize
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“I think good advisors need several qualities. First, they should be good listeners because they need to understand the problem fully. Second, they should have experience in the area they’re giving advice about. Also, they need to be patient and not judge the person. Finally, they should be honest and tell the truth even if it’s difficult to hear.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Clear list với sequencing
- Vocabulary: Functional but basic (good listeners, experience, patient, honest)
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers relevant points nhưng explanations are superficial
📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:
“I’d say effective advice-giving is something of an art form that requires a multifaceted skill set. At the core, I believe empathy is absolutely paramount. A good advisor needs the ability to genuinely understand someone’s situation from their perspective, not just impose their own worldview. This means truly listening – not just waiting for their turn to speak – and picking up on both the explicit concerns being voiced and the underlying emotions that might not be articulated.
Equally important is emotional intelligence and perceptiveness. The best advisors can gauge whether someone actually wants concrete solutions or simply needs validation and emotional support. They can read between the lines to understand the real issue, which may not be what’s initially presented. More often than not, people already know what they should do – they just need someone to help them work through their ambivalence.
Beyond empathy, objectivity is crucial. Good advisors can maintain enough emotional distance to see situations clearly without getting caught up in the drama. They can offer a fresh perspective precisely because they’re not emotionally invested in the outcome the way the advice-seeker is. That said, this objectivity must be balanced with compassion – being brutally honest without sensitivity can do more harm than good.
I’d also highlight the importance of humility and self-awareness. The best advisors recognize the limitations of their knowledge and perspective. They’re comfortable saying “I don’t know” or “This is beyond my experience” rather than pontificating about matters they don’t truly understand. They also acknowledge that their advice might not be right for everyone – what worked for them might not work for someone with different circumstances, values, or personality.
Lastly, I think timing and tact are underrated qualities. Knowing when to speak up and when to remain silent, how to frame advice in a way that’s palatable rather than preachy, and understanding that sometimes the most valuable thing you can offer is just presence rather than solutions – these subtle skills often distinguish mediocre advisors from truly exceptional ones.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Sophisticated với clear progression through qualities, each fully developed
- Vocabulary: Highly advanced (multifaceted, paramount, articulated, perceptiveness, ambivalence, pontificating, palatable)
- Grammar: Complex structures với participles, relative clauses, contrast conjunctions
- Critical Thinking: Shows psychological depth, provides nuanced understanding, balances different qualities, acknowledges complexity
💡 Key Language Features:
- Discourse markers: At the core, Equally important, Beyond, That said, Lastly
- Emphasis structures: absolutely paramount, equally important, crucial, underrated
- Abstract nouns: empathy, objectivity, humility, self-awareness, ambivalence
- Academic collocations: emotional intelligence, maintain distance, recognize limitations
Question 6: Should professionals like teachers or managers be trained in giving advice?
🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:
- Dạng: Opinion + Recommendation (Should…)
- Key words: professionals, teachers, managers, trained, giving advice
- Cách tiếp cận: State position, explain why training is/isn’t necessary, consider implications
📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:
“Yes, I think they should receive training. Teachers and managers often need to give advice to students or employees, but not everyone knows how to do it well. Training could teach them how to communicate better and be more understanding. This would help them give more effective advice that actually helps people instead of making them feel bad.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Clear position với basic reasoning
- Vocabulary: Simple (teach them, communicate better, feel bad)
- Tại sao Band 6-7: Makes valid point nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated vocabulary
📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:
“I’d strongly advocate for such training, as the ability to offer constructive guidance is integral to these roles yet often overlooked in professional development. The reality is that while professionals in positions of authority are frequently expected to counsel others, many have never received formal instruction in the nuances of effective advising.
For teachers, the stakes are particularly high. They’re routinely faced with students navigating academic struggles, social pressures, and personal challenges. Without proper training in developmental psychology, active listening techniques, and trauma-informed approaches, even well-meaning advice can be counterproductive. For instance, telling a student to “just work harder” without understanding underlying issues like learning difficulties or mental health challenges could exacerbate feelings of inadequacy. Training would equip teachers with frameworks to assess situations more holistically and offer guidance that’s both empowering and developmentally appropriate.
Similarly, managers who lack training in coaching and mentoring might inadvertently create toxic dynamics. There’s a fine line between offering guidance and micromanaging, between being supportive and being patronizing. Training could help managers develop skills in motivational interviewing, conflict resolution, and emotional regulation – all crucial for giving advice that builds confidence rather than undermines it. Moreover, in today’s diverse workplaces, training should include cultural competency to ensure advice is sensitive to different backgrounds and perspectives.
From a broader perspective, such training would benefit the organizations themselves. When advice is given skillfully, it fosters trust, enhances performance, and contributes to a more positive organizational culture. Conversely, poorly delivered advice can damage relationships, decrease morale, and even trigger legal issues in some cases.
That being said, training shouldn’t be a one-off workshop but rather an ongoing process with opportunities for reflection and peer feedback. The goal should be to develop genuine competence rather than just checking a box, because inauthentic or formulaic advice-giving is easily detected and can be worse than no advice at all.”
Phân tích:
- Structure: Comprehensive với clear argument for each professional group, considers broader implications, offers implementation suggestion
- Vocabulary: Sophisticated professional terminology (integral, overlooked, trauma-informed, holistically, micromanaging, competency)
- Grammar: Complex structures với conditionals, relative clauses, contrast structures
- Critical Thinking: Shows understanding of professional contexts, considers consequences, provides specific examples, offers balanced conclusion
💡 Key Language Features:
- Discourse markers: The reality is, For instance, Similarly, Moreover, From a broader perspective, That being said
- Strong opinion language: I’d strongly advocate for, particularly high stakes, crucial
- Professional vocabulary: constructive guidance, developmental psychology, motivational interviewing, cultural competency
- Contrast structures: between…and, rather than, can be…rather than
Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng
Topic-Specific Vocabulary
| Từ vựng/Cụm từ | Loại từ | Phiên âm | Nghĩa tiếng Việt | Ví dụ | Collocation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| offer guidance | verb phrase | /ˈɒfə ˈɡaɪdns/ | đưa ra lời hướng dẫn | She offered valuable guidance on my career path. | offer valuable/sound/practical/constructive guidance |
| seek counsel | verb phrase | /siːk ˈkaʊnsl/ | tìm kiếm lời khuyên | I sought counsel from my mentor about the decision. | seek professional/legal/wise/spiritual counsel |
| turn to someone | phrasal verb | /tɜːn tuː/ | nhờ đến ai đó | When in trouble, I always turn to my best friend. | turn to friends/family/experts for advice |
| weigh in on | phrasal verb | /weɪ ɪn ɒn/ | đưa ra ý kiến về | Could you weigh in on this matter? | weigh in on a discussion/issue/debate |
| pour one’s heart out | idiom | /pɔː hɑːt aʊt/ | tâm sự hết lòng | She poured her heart out about her relationship problems. | pour one’s heart out to someone |
| face a dilemma | verb phrase | /feɪs ə dɪˈlemə/ | đối mặt với tình thế lưỡng nan | He faced a dilemma between family and career. | face a difficult/serious/moral dilemma |
| torn between | adjective phrase | /tɔːn bɪˈtwiːn/ | bị giằng xé giữa | I was torn between two excellent job offers. | torn between options/choices/two paths |
| thought-provoking | adjective | /θɔːt prəˈvəʊkɪŋ/ | kích thích tư duy, gây suy nghĩ | She asked thought-provoking questions. | thought-provoking questions/ideas/discussion |
| navigate | verb | /ˈnævɪɡeɪt/ | vượt qua, xử lý | Young people need guidance to navigate challenges. | navigate difficulties/challenges/situations |
| tread carefully | idiom | /tred ˈkeəfəli/ | hành động thận trọng | You need to tread carefully when giving relationship advice. | tread carefully/cautiously/lightly |
| withstand | verb | /wɪðˈstænd/ | chịu đựng, vượt qua | A strong relationship can withstand distance. | withstand pressure/challenges/test of time |
| weigh heavily on someone’s mind | idiom | /weɪ ˈhevɪli ɒn maɪnd/ | đè nặng lên tâm trí | The decision weighed heavily on her mind. | weigh heavily on one’s mind/conscience |
| grapple with | phrasal verb | /ˈɡræpl wɪð/ | vật lộn với, đấu tranh với | She’s grappling with a difficult choice. | grapple with problems/issues/questions |
| pivotal | adjective | /ˈpɪvətl/ | then chốt, quan trọng | This is a pivotal moment in your career. | pivotal role/moment/decision/point |
| empathy | noun | /ˈempəθi/ | sự đồng cảm | Good advisors need empathy to understand others. | show/feel/develop/lack empathy |
| discerning | adjective | /dɪˈsɜːnɪŋ/ | sáng suốt, có khả năng phán đoán | A discerning advisor knows when to speak. | discerning judgment/eye/taste |
| profound | adjective | /prəˈfaʊnd/ | sâu sắc, triệt để | The conversation had a profound impact on me. | profound effect/impact/influence/change |
| articulate | verb | /ɑːˈtɪkjuleɪt/ | diễn đạt rõ ràng | He articulated his concerns clearly. | articulate thoughts/feelings/ideas/views |
| autonomy | noun | /ɔːˈtɒnəmi/ | quyền tự chủ | Young adults value their autonomy. | personal/individual/professional autonomy |
| filial piety | noun phrase | /ˈfɪliəl ˈpaɪəti/ | lòng hiếu thảo | Filial piety is important in Asian cultures. | practice/value/emphasize filial piety |
Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases
| Cụm từ | Nghĩa | Ví dụ sử dụng | Band điểm |
|---|---|---|---|
| read between the lines | hiểu ngầm ý, hiểu điều không nói ra | Good advisors can read between the lines to understand the real issue. | 8-9 |
| take something with a grain of salt | không tin hoàn toàn, nghi ngờ phần nào | You should take online advice with a grain of salt. | 7-8 |
| put oneself in someone’s shoes | đặt mình vào vị trí người khác | Try to put yourself in her shoes before giving advice. | 7-8 |
| speak one’s mind | nói thẳng điều mình nghĩ | She always speaks her mind, even if it’s uncomfortable. | 7-8 |
| beat around the bush | nói vòng vo, không thẳng thắn | Don’t beat around the bush – just tell me what you think. | 7-8 |
| food for thought | điều đáng suy nghĩ | His advice gave me real food for thought. | 7-8 |
| words of wisdom | lời khuyên sáng suốt | My grandmother’s words of wisdom stayed with me. | 7-8 |
| hit the nail on the head | nói đúng trọng tâm | Her advice really hit the nail on the head. | 7-8 |
| the blind leading the blind | người không biết gì dẫn người không biết gì | Getting dating advice from him is like the blind leading the blind. | 8-9 |
| you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink | có thể khuyên nhưng không thể ép buộc | I gave her advice but you can lead a horse to water… | 8-9 |
| strike while the iron is hot | nắm bắt thời cơ, tận dụng lúc thuận lợi | My advice was to strike while the iron is hot. | 7-8 |
| a word to the wise | lời khuyên cho người thông minh (sẽ hiểu) | A word to the wise: don’t invest all your savings. | 8-9 |
Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)
Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:
- 📝 Well,… – Khi cần vài giây suy nghĩ hoặc đưa ra quan điểm
- 📝 Actually,… – Khi muốn đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc correct một điểm
- 📝 To be honest,… / To be frank,… – Khi nói thật và thẳng thắn
- 📝 I’d say that… / I’d have to say… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm có suy nghĩ
- 📝 From my perspective,… – Từ góc nhìn của tôi
Để bổ sung ý:
- 📝 What’s more,… / Moreover,… / Furthermore,… – Hơn nữa
- 📝 On top of that,… / In addition to that,… – Thêm vào đó
- 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
- 📝 Another point worth mentioning is… – Một điểm đáng nói khác là
- 📝 Equally important is… – Quan trọng không kém là
Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:
- 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
- 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng cũng cần xem xét
- 📝 That being said,… / Having said that,… – Dù vậy thì
- 📝 Conversely,… – Ngược lại
Để đưa ra ví dụ:
- 📝 For instance,… / For example,… – Ví dụ
- 📝 Take… for example – Lấy… làm ví dụ
- 📝 A case in point is… – Một trường hợp điển hình là
- 📝 To illustrate this point,… – Để minh họa điểm này
Để kết luận:
- 📝 All in all,… / All things considered,… – Tóm lại, xét mọi mặt
- 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì
- 📝 In the final analysis,… – Phân tích cuối cùng
- 📝 Ultimately,… – Rốt cuộc thì
Để thừa nhận sự phức tạp:
- 📝 It’s not quite as straightforward as that – Không đơn giản như vậy
- 📝 It’s a bit more nuanced than that – Phức tạp hơn một chút
- 📝 There are several factors at play here – Có nhiều yếu tố tác động ở đây
- 📝 It depends on various circumstances – Tùy thuộc vào nhiều hoàn cảnh
Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng
1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):
Mixed conditional:
- Formula: If + past perfect, would/could + base verb
- Ví dụ: “If I hadn’t given her that advice, she would still be stuck in that situation.”
Inversion (đảo ngữ):
- Formula: Had + subject + past participle, subject + would have…
- Ví dụ: “Had I known the consequences, I would have phrased my advice differently.”
2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):
Non-defining relative clauses:
- Formula: Subject, which/who + verb, verb
- Ví dụ: “My friend, who had been struggling with the decision for weeks, finally asked for my advice.”
Reduced relative clauses:
- Formula: Subject + V-ing/V-ed
- Ví dụ: “The advice given by experienced people tends to be more valuable.”
3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):
Impersonal passive:
- It is thought/believed/said that…
- Ví dụ: “It is generally believed that advice from elders should be respected.”
- People are encouraged/expected/advised to…
- Ví dụ: “Young people are encouraged to seek guidance from mentors.”
4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):
What-cleft:
- What I find most… is…
- Ví dụ: “What I find most challenging about giving advice is knowing when to speak up.”
The thing that:
- The thing that matters most is…
- Ví dụ: “The thing that makes advice effective is timing and delivery.”
It-cleft:
- It was… that…
- Ví dụ: “It was her willingness to listen that made my advice more impactful.”
5. Inversion for Emphasis:
Not only… but also:
- Ví dụ: “Not only did the advice help her career, but it also strengthened our friendship.”
Rarely/Seldom/Never:
- Ví dụ: “Rarely do people appreciate unsolicited advice, no matter how well-intentioned.”
6. Participle Clauses:
Present participle:
- Ví dụ: “Knowing her personality well, I tailored my advice to suit her needs.”
Past participle:
- Ví dụ: “Faced with this dilemma, she sought advice from multiple sources.”
7. Subjunctive Mood:
- I suggest/recommend/propose that + subject + base verb
- Ví dụ: “I suggested that she consider all options before making a decision.”
Việc phát triển khả năng đưa ra lời khuyên cũng liên quan đến sự trưởng thành trong các mối quan hệ, điều này có thể được khám phá thêm trong describe a family member who inspires you khi nói về những người đã ảnh hưởng đến cách bạn nhìn nhận và đưa ra lời khuyên.
Sổ tay ghi chép từ vựng và cụm từ IELTS Speaking về chủ đề advice
Chiến Lược Tối Ưu Để Đạt Band Cao
Chuẩn Bị Trước Khi Thi
1. Xây Dựng Ngân Hàng Câu Chuyện Cá Nhân:
- Chuẩn bị 5-7 trải nghiệm thực tế từ cuộc sống
- Mỗi trải nghiệm có thể adapt cho nhiều topic khác nhau
- Practice kể chi tiết với cảm xúc và reflection
- Đảm bảo mỗi story có clear beginning-middle-end
2. Học Vocabulary Theo Context:
- Không học từ riêng lẻ mà học theo chunks và collocations
- Practice sử dụng từ mới trong câu hoàn chỉnh
- Record voice khi practice để check pronunciation
- Focus vào topic-specific vocabulary thay vì general words
3. Phát Triển Critical Thinking:
- Practice analyzing issues từ multiple perspectives
- Đọc opinion articles về social topics
- Thảo luận với bạn bè về various viewpoints
- Tập thói quen “why” – luôn hỏi tại sao cho mọi opinion
Trong Phòng Thi
Part 1 Strategy:
- Mở rộng mỗi answer thành 2-3 câu
- Structure: Direct answer → Reason/Example → Additional detail
- Maintain natural eye contact
- Không sợ pause ngắn để suy nghĩ (1-2 giây)
- Smile và show engagement
Part 2 Strategy:
- Sử dụng đầy đủ 1 phút preparation time
- Note keywords theo bullet points, không viết câu
- Bắt đầu với attention-grabbing opening
- Dành 30-40% thời gian cho “explain” part
- Nói 2-3 phút đầy đủ, không dưới 1.5 phút
- Kết thúc với short conclusion nếu còn thời gian
Part 3 Strategy:
- Take 2-3 seconds để organize thoughts
- Give direct answer first, sau đó elaborate
- Use examples từ society/world, không chỉ personal
- Show balanced view: “On the one hand… On the other hand…”
- Không sợ disagree politely với premises của câu hỏi
- Acknowledge complexity: “It’s not straightforward…”
Lỗi Cần Tránh
Về Nội Dung:
- ❌ Học thuộc template và áp dụng cứng nhắc
- ❌ Đưa ra opinions quá extreme/absolute
- ❌ Nói về political hoặc controversial religious topics
- ❌ Copy answer từ mẫu mà không personalize
Về Ngôn Ngữ:
- ❌ Overuse big words không phù hợp context
- ❌ Lặp lại từ vựng (dùng “good” 10 lần)
- ❌ Grammar mistakes cơ bản (subject-verb agreement)
- ❌ Monotone delivery, không có intonation
Về Thái Độ:
- ❌ Không maintain eye contact
- ❌ Speak quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm
- ❌ Show nervousness quá rõ (fidgeting)
- ❌ Give up sau khi mắc lỗi (self-correct và continue)
Timeline Chuẩn Bị Hiệu Quả
3 Tháng Trước Thi:
- Weeks 1-4: Build foundation vocabulary và basic structures
- Weeks 5-8: Practice với sample questions, record và review
- Weeks 9-12: Mock tests, identify weaknesses, intensive improvement
1 Tháng Trước Thi:
- Weeks 1-2: Daily speaking practice (15-20 phút)
- Weeks 3-4: Focus vào weak areas, polish stories
1 Tuần Trước Thi:
- Review vocabulary notes
- Practice recent actual test questions
- Do 2-3 full mock tests
- Rest well, maintain confidence
Mindset Quan Trọng
Remember:
- IELTS Speaking không phải test về knowledge mà về communication skills
- Examiner đánh giá cách bạn express ideas, không phải ideas themselves
- Natural delivery quan trọng hơn perfect grammar
- Personality và authenticity làm bài nổi bật
- Mistakes are normal – self-correct và move on
Hãy tự tin vì:
- Bạn đã prepare kỹ lưỡng
- Examiner muốn bạn thành công
- Đây là conversation, không phải interrogation
- Bạn có unique experiences và perspectives
- Band điểm cao hoàn toàn achievable với effort đúng hướng
Nếu bạn muốn tham khảo thêm về cách tạo ấn tượng trong các tình huống giao tiếp khác, Describe an experience of good service in a store cũng cung cấp những insights về cách miêu tả experiences một cách chi tiết và ấn tượng.
Kết Luận
Chủ đề “describe a time when you gave advice to a friend” là một topic thực tế và gần gũi trong IELTS Speaking, cho phép bạn demonstrate nhiều aspects của language ability từ storytelling cho đến critical thinking. Với sự chuẩn bị đúng hướng, đây có thể là opportunity tuyệt vời để showcase communication skills của bạn.
Key takeaways từ bài viết này:
Về Nội Dung:
- Chọn một real experience có emotional depth
- Cover đầy đủ tất cả bullet points, đặc biệt “explain”
- Balance giữa describing situation và reflecting on feelings
- Show maturity trong understanding về advice-giving
Về Ngôn Ngữ:
- Sử dụng topic-specific vocabulary naturally
- Vary sentence structures để tránh repetition
- Incorporate idioms và advanced phrases appropriately
- Maintain natural flow với discourse markers
Về Strategy:
- Practice với nhiều perspectives về chủ đề
- Prepare flexible stories có thể adapt
- Focus vào quality of expression hơn quantity of words
- Show genuine personality và authentic voice
Hãy nhớ rằng achieving band cao trong IELTS Speaking không phải overnight journey. Nó requires consistent practice, willingness to make mistakes và learn from them, và most importantly, confidence trong expressing yourself. Với mindset đúng và preparation thoroughness theo guidelines trong bài này, bạn hoàn toàn có thể đạt được target band score.
Chúc bạn tự tin bước vào phòng thi và demonstrate the best version của communication abilities. Remember: You’re not just taking a test – you’re showing the world what you can express in English. Good luck!
[…] tự như describe a time when you gave advice to a friend, việc thể hiện sự phát triển cá nhân và những bài học rút ra từ trải […]
[…] tự như describe a time when you gave advice to a friend, việc nói về challenges đòi hỏi khả năng diễn đạt cảm xúc và sự phát […]