IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe a Time When You Had to Lead a Group Project” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề lãnh đạo nhóm là một trong những đề tài phổ biến và quan trọng nhất trong IELTS Speaking, đặc biệt ở Part 2 và Part 3. Đây là cơ hội tuyệt vời để bạn thể hiện khả năng sử dụng từ vựng liên quan đến kỹ năng mềm, quản lý, và làm việc nhóm – những chủ đề được giám khảo đánh giá cao.

Chủ đề “Describe A Time When You Had To Lead A Group Project” xuất hiện thường xuyên trong các kỳ thi IELTS từ năm 2020 đến nay, với tần suất trung bình 2-3 lần mỗi quý. Theo số liệu từ các trung tâm thi IELTS tại Việt Nam và các diễn đàn học viên, đề tài về leadership và teamwork có khả năng xuất hiện cao trong tương lai do tính ứng dụng thực tế và khả năng đánh giá toàn diện năng lực ngôn ngữ của thí sinh.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được cách tiếp cận chủ đề leadership một cách tự nhiên và ấn tượng qua các câu hỏi thường gặp ở cả 3 Part của bài thi Speaking. Bạn sẽ có trong tay bộ sưu tập các bài mẫu chi tiết theo từng band điểm từ 6-7, 7.5-8 đến 8.5-9, cùng với kho từ vựng phong phú và chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của một examiner giàu kinh nghiệm. Đặc biệt, tôi sẽ chỉ ra những lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục để tự tin đạt điểm cao.

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài khoảng 4-5 phút, trong đó giám khảo sẽ hỏi các câu hỏi ngắn gọn về cuộc sống hàng ngày, sở thích, công việc hoặc học tập của bạn. Đây là phần “làm quen” nhưng đừng chủ quan vì điểm số đã bắt đầu được chấm từ đây.

Chiến lược quan trọng nhất cho Part 1 là trả lời tự nhiên và mở rộng ý trong 2-3 câu. Đừng chỉ đưa ra câu trả lời Yes/No ngắn gọn. Hãy bổ sung lý do, ví dụ hoặc chi tiết cá nhân để câu trả lời thêm phần sinh động.

Học viên Việt Nam thường mắc phải những lỗi sau ở Part 1:

• Trả lời quá ngắn, chỉ một câu đơn giản
• Sử dụng từ vựng quá cơ bản, lặp đi lặp lại
• Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
• Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm do lo lắng
• Không duy trì eye contact với examiner

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you prefer to work alone or in a team?

Question 2: Have you ever been a leader in your school or workplace?

Question 3: What qualities do you think a good leader should have?

Question 4: Do you like taking responsibility for tasks?

Question 5: How do you usually make decisions when working with others?

Question 6: Have you ever had to organize an event or activity?

Question 7: Do you find it easy to delegate tasks to others?

Question 8: What kind of team projects have you been involved in?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you prefer to work alone or in a team?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Đưa ra preference rõ ràng (có thể nói cả hai tùy tình huống)
• Giải thích lý do cho sự lựa chọn
• Đưa ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm học tập hoặc công việc

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I prefer working in a team. I think it’s more interesting because we can share ideas and help each other. For example, when I did my university project last year, my team members had different skills and we could complete the work faster together.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có câu trả lời trực tiếp, đưa ra lý do cơ bản và có ví dụ thực tế
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (interesting, help each other), thiếu cụm từ nâng cao, cấu trúc câu chưa phức tạp
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Trả lời đầy đủ câu hỏi với độ dài phù hợp nhưng vocabulary và grammar chưa impressive

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, I’d say it really depends on the nature of the task. For routine assignments or tasks requiring deep concentration, I tend to work better independently. However, when it comes to complex projects that demand diverse perspectives, I definitely prefer collaborating with a team. Actually, some of my most rewarding experiences at university came from group projects where we could bounce ideas off each other and leverage each other’s strengths.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Thể hiện sự linh hoạt trong tư duy (depends on), sử dụng từ vựng chính xác và phong phú (routine assignments, deep concentration, diverse perspectives, leverage), cấu trúc câu đa dạng với mệnh đề phụ
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency tự nhiên với discourse markers (Well, Actually), lexical resource sophisticated (bounce ideas off, leverage strengths), grammar range rộng (when it comes to, that demand), ideas nuanced (không chọn một phía tuyệt đối)

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• depends on the nature of the task: tùy thuộc vào tính chất công việc
• deep concentration: sự tập trung sâu
• diverse perspectives: những góc nhìn đa dạng
• bounce ideas off each other: trao đổi ý tưởng qua lại
• leverage each other’s strengths: tận dụng thế mạnh của nhau

---

Question: What qualities do you think a good leader should have?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Liệt kê 2-3 phẩm chất quan trọng
• Giải thích tại sao mỗi phẩm chất lại cần thiết
• Có thể đưa ví dụ về một leader bạn biết hoặc admire

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think a good leader should be confident and have good communication skills. They need to be able to explain things clearly so everyone understands their tasks. Also, they should be fair and listen to team members’ opinions.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Nêu được nhiều phẩm chất, có giải thích cơ bản về tầm quan trọng
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng basic (good, fair), thiếu examples cụ thể, cấu trúc câu đơn giản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Content adequate nhưng thiếu depth và linguistic sophistication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“From my perspective, effective leadership requires a combination of qualities. First and foremost, I’d say emotional intelligence is crucial – a leader needs to be empathetic and understand what motivates each team member. Equally important is decisiveness – the ability to make tough calls when necessary while remaining open to feedback. I really admire leaders who can strike a balance between being assertive and approachable, creating an environment where people feel valued and heard.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Từ vựng sophisticated và precise (emotional intelligence, empathetic, decisiveness, strike a balance), cấu trúc đa dạng (từ góc nhìn cá nhân, liệt kê có thứ tự), ideas có chiều sâu (nhấn mạnh sự cân bằng)
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Vocabulary range rộng với topic-specific terms, grammar với multiple clause types, coherence tốt với first and foremost, equally important, ideas mature và balanced

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• emotional intelligence: trí tuệ cảm xúc
• empathetic: đồng cảm, thấu hiểu
• make tough calls: đưa ra quyết định khó khăn
• strike a balance: tìm được sự cân bằng
• assertive: quyết đoán, tự tin
• valued and heard: được trân trọng và lắng nghe

---

Question: Have you ever had to organize an event or activity?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời Yes/No rõ ràng
• Nêu ngắn gọn sự kiện/hoạt động đó là gì
• Chia sẻ một chi tiết nhỏ về trải nghiệm

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I organized my friend’s birthday party last year. I had to book the restaurant, invite people and prepare some games. It was quite challenging but everyone had a good time.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Có ví dụ cụ thể, nêu được các tasks involved
• Hạn chế: Thiếu feeling hoặc reflection về experience, vocabulary basic (good time, challenging)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Đáp ứng được yêu cầu cơ bản nhưng chưa impressive

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Absolutely! Just a few months ago, I took the lead in organizing a charity fundraiser for my university club. I had to coordinate with multiple stakeholders – from securing sponsors to managing a team of volunteers. What made it particularly demanding was the tight timeline, but it taught me invaluable lessons about time management and staying composed under pressure. The event ultimately exceeded our fundraising target, which was incredibly fulfilling.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Từ vựng phong phú và chính xác (took the lead, coordinate with stakeholders, securing sponsors, staying composed under pressure), có reflection về bài học (taught me invaluable lessons), kết quả cụ thể (exceeded our target), cảm xúc được diễn tả tốt (fulfilling)
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Lexical resource với collocations tự nhiên, grammar với reduced relative clauses và complex sentences, coherence mạch lạc với what made it particularly…, the event ultimately…

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• took the lead: đảm nhận vai trò lãnh đạo
• coordinate with multiple stakeholders: phối hợp với nhiều bên liên quan
• securing sponsors: tìm kiếm nhà tài trợ
• staying composed under pressure: giữ bình tĩnh dưới áp lực
• exceeded our fundraising target: vượt mục tiêu gây quỹ
• fulfilling: mang lại cảm giác thỏa mãn, đáng giá

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần quan trọng nhất của bài thi Speaking, kéo dài 3-4 phút bao gồm 1 phút chuẩn bị và 2-3 phút nói liên tục. Đây là lúc bạn thể hiện khả năng độc thoại, kể chuyện có cấu trúc và duy trì fluency trong thời gian dài.

Chiến lược hiệu quả cho Part 2:

• Sử dụng đầy đủ 1 phút chuẩn bị để ghi chú keywords, KHÔNG viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• Đảm bảo nói tối thiểu 1.5 phút, lý tưởng là 2 phút
• Trả lời đầy đủ TẤT CẢ các bullet points trong đề bài
• Sử dụng thì quá khứ (past tenses) khi kể về trải nghiệm đã xảy ra
• Dành nhiều thời gian cho phần “explain” vì đây là phần ghi điểm cao nhất

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam ở Part 2:

• Không tận dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị, vội vàng bắt đầu nói
• Nói quá ngắn, chỉ khoảng 1 phút rồi hết ý tưởng
• Bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points
• Kể chuyện không có cấu trúc rõ ràng, nhảy lung tung giữa các ý
• Dùng thì hiện tại thay vì quá khứ khi kể câu chuyện
• Phần “explain” quá ngắn gọn, không phát triển đủ

Cue Card

Describe a time when you had to lead a group project

You should say:

• What the project was about
• Who was in your group
• What you did as a leader
• And explain how you felt about this experience

Phân Tích Đề Bài

• Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an experience – kể về một trải nghiệm cụ thể trong quá khứ
• Thì động từ: Quá khứ (past simple, past continuous, past perfect) vì đây là sự kiện đã xảy ra
• Bullet points phải cover:
  • Bullet 1: Nội dung, mục đích của dự án
  • Bullet 2: Thành viên trong nhóm (số lượng, vai trò, background)
  • Bullet 3: Hành động cụ thể bạn đã làm với tư cách leader
  • Bullet 4 (quan trọng nhất): Cảm xúc và suy nghĩ về trải nghiệm
• Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là phần chiếm nhiều thời gian nhất và thể hiện khả năng phân tích, reflection của bạn. Đừng chỉ nói “I felt happy” mà hãy giải thích tại sao, trải nghiệm đó dạy bạn điều gì, tác động như thế nào đến bạn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

“I’d like to talk about a time when I led a group project at my university. It was about two years ago, in my second year of study.

The project was about marketing research for a local coffee shop. Our teacher asked us to create a marketing plan to help the shop attract more customers. There were five people in my group – three girls and two boys. Most of them were my classmates and we knew each other quite well.

As the leader, I had to do many things. First, I organized meetings every week to discuss our progress. I also divided the tasks among team members based on their strengths. For example, one person was good at design, so I asked her to create the poster. Another person liked talking to people, so he did the customer surveys. I also checked everyone’s work to make sure it was good quality and we were following the deadline.

Sometimes there were disagreements in the group. Some members wanted to do things differently, but I tried to listen to everyone’s ideas and find a solution that worked for all of us. I also had to motivate the team when some people felt tired or stressed.

I felt quite nervous at first because it was my first time being a leader. But as the project continued, I became more confident. When we finished and got a good grade, I felt really proud and happy. This experience taught me that good communication is very important for teamwork. I also learned that being a leader is not easy, but it can be very rewarding.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có sử dụng một số linking words (first, also, but, when) nhưng còn đơn giản. Nội dung mạch lạc, theo đúng thứ tự bullet points. Có một số hesitation nhẹ với cấu trúc “I had to do many things”
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng adequate cho topic (marketing research, organize meetings, divided the tasks, deadline, disagreements, motivate). Tuy nhiên còn lặp lại một số từ (good, people) và thiếu collocations nâng cao
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Sử dụng mix của simple và complex sentences. Có past tenses chính xác. Xuất hiện một số cấu trúc như relative clauses (that worked for all of us) và when clauses. Tuy nhiên chưa có nhiều cấu trúc advanced
Pronunciation	6-7	Giả định phát âm rõ ràng, dễ hiểu với một số lỗi nhỏ không ảnh hưởng communication

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points
• ✅ Có cấu trúc rõ ràng, dễ theo dõi
• ✅ Sử dụng thì quá khứ chính xác
• ✅ Có ví dụ cụ thể về tasks và challenges

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary còn basic, thiếu sophisticated expressions
• ⚠️ Grammar structures chưa đa dạng, nhiều simple sentences
• ⚠️ Phần explain còn ngắn và surface-level

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

“I’d like to share an experience when I took on the role of team leader for a quite challenging project during my final year at university.

The project was centered around developing a mobile application for elderly users in our community. Our computer science professor had assigned us this task as part of our capstone project, and the goal was to create something practical and user-friendly that could genuinely help older people navigate technology more easily.

My team consisted of five members with diverse skill sets. We had two software developers who were exceptionally talented at coding, one UX designer who had a real eye for detail, and one business student who understood the market perspective. What made this group interesting was that we all had different working styles – some preferred late-night work sessions while others were early birds.

As the appointed leader, I had to juggle multiple responsibilities. Initially, I conducted brainstorming sessions where everyone could contribute their ideas freely. Then I created a detailed timeline with clear milestones and delegated tasks according to each person’s expertise. One of my key strategies was maintaining open communication channels – I set up a shared online workspace and scheduled regular check-ins to monitor progress. When conflicts arose, which they inevitably did, I tried to mediate fairly by encouraging team members to see things from different angles.

Perhaps my biggest challenge was keeping everyone motivated during the testing phase when we encountered numerous technical glitches. I had to rally the team, reminding them of our initial vision and celebrating small victories along the way.

Looking back, I’d say this experience was both demanding and rewarding. At first, I felt quite overwhelmed by the responsibility – there were moments when I doubted my leadership abilities, especially when facing pushback from team members. However, as we progressed and I saw our app actually taking shape and receiving positive feedback from test users, I felt an immense sense of accomplishment.

This project taught me invaluable lessons about adaptive leadership. I learned that being a good leader isn’t about having all the answers; it’s about bringing out the best in others and creating an environment where everyone feels empowered to contribute. The experience significantly boosted my confidence in handling complex group dynamics and made me realize that effective leadership requires both empathy and decisiveness.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Rất mạch lạc với discourse markers sophisticated (initially, then, perhaps, looking back). Ý tưởng được phát triển logic và smooth. Minimal hesitation, speaks at length without noticeable effort
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Vocabulary range rộng và precise (took on the role, juggle responsibilities, mediate fairly, rally the team, pushback, adaptive leadership). Có nhiều collocations tự nhiên (eye for detail, clear milestones, open communication channels, immense sense of accomplishment)
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Sử dụng linh hoạt nhiều cấu trúc complex: relative clauses (which they inevitably did, where everyone could contribute), participle clauses (reminding them, seeing our app taking shape), conditional ẩn (isn’t about having… it’s about bringing out). Mix tenses phù hợp
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Giả định có word stress và sentence stress tốt, intonation tự nhiên

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“good at design” / “liked talking to people”	“exceptionally talented at coding” / “had an eye for detail”
Grammar	“I had to do many things. First, I organized meetings”	“As the appointed leader, I had to juggle multiple responsibilities. Initially, I conducted brainstorming sessions”
Ideas	“I felt nervous but became confident”	“I felt overwhelmed by the responsibility – there were moments when I doubted my leadership abilities, especially when facing pushback” – chi tiết và cụ thể hơn

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

“I’d like to recount a particularly formative experience that really put my leadership skills to the test – this was during my third year at university when I was entrusted with spearheading a cross-functional research project on sustainable urban development.

The project itself was quite ambitious in scope. We were tasked with conducting comprehensive research into how our city could transition towards more sustainable practices, focusing specifically on waste management and renewable energy integration. What made this especially compelling was that our findings would be presented to local government officials, so there was genuine real-world impact at stake.

I was working with a remarkably diverse team of seven individuals, each bringing their own unique perspectives and expertise. We had environmental science majors who understood the technical intricacies, business students with sharp analytical minds, and even a journalism student whose storytelling abilities proved invaluable when it came to crafting our final presentation. The challenge, of course, was harnessing these different strengths while managing what were sometimes quite divergent viewpoints on our approach.

Taking the helm of this project required me to step outside my comfort zone in several ways. From the outset, I knew that traditional top-down leadership wouldn’t work with such strong-willed, talented individuals. Instead, I adopted a more collaborative approach, essentially positioning myself as a facilitator rather than a dictator. I initiated structured brainstorming sessions where we could collectively map out our research methodology, but I also made sure to have one-on-one conversations with team members to understand their individual concerns and aspirations.

Resource allocation was another critical aspect I had to manage. I created a detailed Gantt chart to visualize our timeline and ensure we weren’t spreading ourselves too thin. When tensions inevitably surfaced – particularly when deadlines were looming and stress levels peaked – I found myself playing the role of mediator, helping people voice their frustrations constructively and refocusing everyone on our shared objectives.

One pivotal moment came midway through when we hit a major roadblock with our data collection. Some team members wanted to pivot entirely, while others felt we should persevere with our original plan. This required me to make some tough calls while still honoring the collaborative spirit we’d established. I convened an emergency meeting, presented both options with their respective pros and cons, and facilitated a structured decision-making process that ultimately led us to a hybrid approach that everyone could buy into.

Reflecting on this experience, my feelings were decidedly mixed but ultimately tremendously positive. Initially, I was wracked with self-doubt – constantly second-guessing my decisions and lying awake at night worrying about whether I was living up to everyone’s expectations. There were moments of genuine frustration, particularly when I felt I was shouldering a disproportionate burden or when interpersonal conflicts seemed insurmountable.

However, watching the project come to fruition was extraordinarily gratifying. When we delivered our presentation to those government officials and saw them genuinely engaged with our research, nodding thoughtfully and asking probing questions, I felt this profound sense of validation – not just for myself, but for the entire team’s efforts. The experience left me with a deep appreciation for the complexity of leadership.

What I took away from this extends far beyond the technical skills of project management. I learned that authentic leadership is fundamentally about creating space for others to thrive, about having the humility to admit when you don’t have all the answers, and about maintaining your composure even when everything seems to be falling apart. It taught me that vulnerability can actually be a leadership strength – admitting my own uncertainties made team members more comfortable voicing their own concerns. Most importantly, it showed me that leadership isn’t about being the smartest person in the room; it’s about being emotionally intelligent enough to bring out the collective brilliance of your team.

This project was genuinely transformative – it’s shaped how I approach collaboration and conflict resolution to this day, and it gave me the confidence to pursue leadership roles in my professional career that I might have shied away from otherwise.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Exceptionally fluent and coherent. Sophisticated discourse markers (from the outset, essentially, particularly when, reflecting on). Ideas flow naturally with complex logical connections. Speaks at length effortlessly with natural pauses for emphasis
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Wide range of sophisticated vocabulary used naturally (formative experience, spearheading, cross-functional, harnessing strengths, divergent viewpoints, wracked with self-doubt, insurmountable, come to fruition). Skillful use of less common idiomatic phrases (step outside my comfort zone, make tough calls, buy into, living up to expectations). Precise collocations throughout
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range of structures used accurately and appropriately. Complex sentences with multiple clauses handled smoothly. Uses inversion, cleft sentences, participle clauses naturally. Sophisticated use of tenses and aspects (had been working, would be presented, came to fruition)
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Giả định excellent control of pronunciation features, uses stress and intonation to enhance meaning, easy to understand throughout

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói flow cực kỳ tự nhiên với minimal hesitation. Examiner hoàn toàn không cần phải hỏi thêm vì thí sinh đã nói đủ thời gian và cover tất cả các points một cách chi tiết. Sử dụng các discourse markers một cách tinh tế để structure ý tưởng (From the outset, One pivotal moment, Reflecting on this).

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• Ví dụ: “entrusted with spearheading” thay vì đơn giản là “asked to lead” – thể hiện được sự tin tưởng và tầm quan trọng của vai trò
• “wracked with self-doubt” thay vì “very nervous” – diễn tả cảm xúc sâu sắc và vivid hơn nhiều
• “insurmountable” để mô tả conflicts – từ vựng academic và precise
• “come to fruition” – idiomatic expression hoàn toàn natural trong context

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Ví dụ: “What made this especially compelling was that our findings would be presented to local government officials” – cleft sentence để emphasize
• “I found myself playing the role of mediator, helping people voice their frustrations constructively” – participle clause flowing naturally
• “When we delivered our presentation to those government officials and saw them genuinely engaged with our research, nodding thoughtfully and asking probing questions, I felt this profound sense of validation” – complex sentence với multiple clauses được kết nối mượt mà

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Thí sinh không chỉ kể chuyện mà còn reflect deeply về experience. Phần explain cảm xúc rất rich – từ self-doubt ban đầu, frustration giữa chừng, đến validation cuối cùng và lessons learned. Điểm nổi bật là thí sinh thể hiện được nuance (feelings were decidedly mixed), complexity (vulnerability as a strength), và mature perspective (leadership is about emotional intelligence).

---

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2 để transition sang Part 3:

Question 1: Would you like to lead more projects in the future?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, I would. Although it was stressful, I learned a lot from the experience and I think I can do better next time.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Absolutely, though I’d say my approach would be somewhat different now. That experience was eye-opening in terms of understanding the nuances of team dynamics, and I’d definitely be more proactive about addressing potential conflicts before they escalate. I’m actually quite keen to apply those lessons in future leadership roles.”

---

Question 2: Was it difficult to manage your team?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, sometimes it was difficult. Different people had different opinions and it was hard to make everyone agree.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“I’d say it was challenging but not insurmountable. The main difficulty lay in balancing diverse personalities and managing expectations when our timelines were tight. What helped was establishing clear communication protocols early on and creating a culture where people felt comfortable raising concerns.”

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần thảo luận chuyên sâu nhất, kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi trừu tượng và phức tạp hơn nhiều so với Part 1 và 2. Đây là lúc examiner đánh giá khả năng phân tích, so sánh, và thảo luận về các vấn đề xã hội rộng lớn hơn liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2.

Yêu cầu của Part 3:

• Phân tích các vấn đề từ nhiều góc độ khác nhau
• So sánh, đối chiếu các quan điểm
• Đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân có lý lẽ chặt chẽ
• Suy luận về nguyên nhân, hậu quả, giải pháp

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời (3-5 câu tối thiểu)
• Sử dụng discourse markers để structure ý (Well, Actually, To be honest, From my perspective)
• Đưa ra examples từ xã hội, không chỉ kinh nghiệm cá nhân
• Thừa nhận complexity của vấn đề (It’s not straightforward, It depends on, There’s no simple answer)
• Cân nhắc nhiều perspectives (On the one hand… On the other hand…)

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam ở Part 3:

• Trả lời quá ngắn như Part 1, thiếu phân tích sâu
• Không đưa ra lý lẽ rõ ràng để support quan điểm
• Thiếu từ vựng trừu tượng (abstract nouns) và academic
• Chỉ nói về bản thân thay vì vấn đề xã hội rộng hơn
• Không thừa nhận complexity, trả lời một chiều
• Lo sợ không biết nên nói quá general và vague

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Leadership in Different Contexts

---

Question 1: What are the differences between leaders in business and leaders in government?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare and contrast
• Key words: differences, business, government
• Cách tiếp cận: Chỉ ra 2-3 điểm khác biệt chính, có thể structure theo: accountability, objectives, decision-making process, hoặc time frames

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“There are some important differences between business and government leaders. Business leaders focus on making profit for their company, while government leaders need to think about the whole country and all citizens. Also, business leaders can make decisions faster because they don’t need to ask many people, but government leaders have to follow a lot of rules and procedures. Another difference is that business leaders are judged by their company’s success, but government leaders are judged by voters in elections.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có logic với 3 điểm khác biệt được nêu ra
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng còn basic (making profit, think about, make decisions, follow rules)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Content relevant và organized nhưng thiếu depth trong analysis và sophisticated language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Well, I think there are some fundamental distinctions between these two types of leadership. First and foremost, their primary objectives differ significantly – business leaders are ultimately accountable to shareholders and focused on maximizing profitability and maintaining competitive advantage, whereas government leaders have a broader mandate to serve the public interest and address diverse societal needs, which often means balancing competing priorities.

Another key difference lies in their decision-making processes. Corporate leaders generally enjoy greater autonomy and can implement changes relatively swiftly because they operate within more streamlined organizational structures. In contrast, political leaders must navigate complex bureaucratic systems, build consensus among various stakeholders, and ensure their decisions comply with constitutional frameworks and democratic processes, which inevitably makes governance more time-consuming and challenging.

I’d also say the accountability mechanisms are quite distinct. Business leaders face market-driven accountability – if their strategies fail, the company suffers financially and they may be replaced by the board. Government leaders, on the other hand, are answerable to the electorate and must operate under intense public scrutiny, with their performance evaluated not just on economic metrics but also on social welfare, environmental stewardship, and long-term national development.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-organized với first and foremost, another key difference, I’d also say – clear signposting
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (fundamental distinctions, accountable to shareholders, broader mandate, navigate bureaucratic systems, build consensus, answerable to the electorate, intense public scrutiny)
• Grammar: Complex structures với clauses, passive voice (are evaluated not just on), relative clauses (which inevitably makes)
• Critical Thinking: Shows nuanced understanding với balanced comparison, acknowledges complexity, uses precise examples

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, First and foremost, Another key difference, In contrast, On the other hand
• Tentative language: I think, I’d say, generally, relatively
• Abstract nouns: distinctions, objectives, autonomy, accountability mechanisms, stewardship
• Comparative structures: differ significantly, more time-consuming, quite distinct

---

Question 2: Do you think leadership skills can be taught, or are they innate?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion với opposing views (nature vs nurture debate)
• Key words: taught, innate (bẩm sinh)
• Cách tiếp cận: Có thể chọn một bên hoặc balanced view (combination of both). Nên có examples cụ thể và reasoning clear

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think leadership skills can be both natural and learned. Some people are born with confidence and good communication abilities, so it’s easier for them to become leaders. However, I also believe that people can learn leadership through education and experience. For example, many universities now offer courses on leadership and management. When people practice leading teams and learn from their mistakes, they can improve their skills. So in my opinion, while some natural ability helps, anyone can become a better leader with training and practice.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Có balanced view, đưa ra cả hai perspectives
• Vocabulary: Adequate với natural, learned, confidence, communication abilities
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Có structure và examples nhưng thiếu sophistication trong language và depth trong reasoning

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is actually quite a contentious question in leadership studies, and I’d say the answer is far from straightforward. From my perspective, it’s most accurate to view leadership as a combination of innate traits and acquired skills.

On the one hand, there’s certainly evidence that some people possess natural predispositions that lend themselves to leadership. Traits like extraversion, emotional resilience, and strategic thinking ability do appear to have genetic components. We’ve all encountered individuals who seem to command respect effortlessly and have an intuitive grasp of group dynamics from a young age. These inborn characteristics can definitely give someone a head start in leadership roles.

That being said, I firmly believe that the fundamentals of effective leadership can absolutely be cultivated through education and experience. Leadership development programs, for instance, can teach practical competencies like conflict resolution, strategic planning, and stakeholder management – skills that don’t necessarily come naturally to anyone. Moreover, experiential learning through actually taking on leadership responsibilities allows people to develop their capabilities in ways that pure talent alone cannot achieve.

What’s particularly interesting is that research suggests self-awareness and adaptability – arguably the most crucial leadership qualities – are highly malleable and can be significantly enhanced through coaching and reflection. I’ve seen individuals who were initially quite introverted and hesitant transform into highly effective leaders once they learned to leverage their unique strengths rather than trying to conform to stereotypical leadership models.

To put it simply, while natural aptitude might determine the ceiling of someone’s leadership potential, education and practice determine whether they’ll reach that ceiling. The most exceptional leaders are typically those who’ve married their innate strengths with continuously honed skills.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Masterful organization với clear thesis (combination), On the one hand (innate side), That being said (learned side), What’s particularly interesting (nuance), To put it simply (conclusion)
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated (contentious question, far from straightforward, natural predispositions, lend themselves to, command respect effortlessly, malleable, leverage their unique strengths)
• Grammar: Complex sentences handled smoothly, mixed conditionals (might determine… determine whether), relative clauses (that don’t necessarily come, who were initially quite introverted)
• Critical Thinking: Shows balanced, nuanced view with acknowledgement of research, personal observation, và metaphor (ceiling analogy)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Actually, From my perspective, On the one hand, That being said, Moreover, What’s particularly interesting, To put it simply
• Tentative language: quite a contentious question, far from straightforward, do appear to, arguably, suggests
• Academic vocabulary: contentious, predispositions, genetic components, fundamentals, cultivated, malleable, enhanced

---

Theme 2: Leadership and Modern Society

Question 1: How has technology changed the way leaders communicate with their teams?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause-Effect / Change over time
• Key words: technology, changed, communicate
• Cách tiếp cận: Nêu 2-3 changes lớn, có positive và negative aspects

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Technology has changed leadership communication a lot. Now leaders can use email, video calls and messaging apps to talk to their team members immediately, even if they work in different countries. This makes communication faster and more convenient. However, it also means that some leaders might not meet their team face-to-face very often, which can make relationships less personal. Another change is that leaders can now share information with many people at the same time using social media or company platforms.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear với examples của changes
• Vocabulary: Adequate (email, video calls, face-to-face, social media)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers basic points nhưng analysis còn surface-level, thiếu specific terminology và deeper implications

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Technology has absolutely revolutionized leadership communication in some quite profound ways. Perhaps most significantly, digital tools have enabled real-time connectivity across geographical boundaries, which has been particularly transformative for multinational organizations and remote teams. Leaders can now conduct virtual meetings, provide instant feedback, and maintain constant touchpoints with team members regardless of physical location. This has democratized access to leadership in ways that were simply impossible a few decades ago.

However, I think it’s important to recognize that this technological shift has been something of a double-edged sword. While it’s enhanced efficiency and accessibility, it’s also created what some experts call ‘digital overload‘ – leaders and team members alike are now inundated with messages and expected to be perpetually available, which can actually undermine the quality of communication and lead to burnout. The nuance and emotional intelligence that comes from face-to-face interaction can be lost when everything’s mediated through screens.

Another interesting development is how technology has made leadership more transparent but also more vulnerable. Social media and internal communication platforms mean that leaders’ messages are now instantly disseminated and subject to immediate public scrutiny and interpretation. This has raised the stakes for leadership communication – a poorly worded email or ill-considered tweet can escalate into a crisis far more quickly than in the past. Leaders now need to be much more digitally literate and conscious of their online presence.

On a more positive note, technology has also facilitated more inclusive communication styles. Tools like collaborative platforms and project management software have enabled leaders to tap into diverse perspectives more easily and foster a culture of co-creation rather than top-down directives. The hierarchical communication barriers that existed in traditional organizations have been somewhat flattened by technology, which I think is largely beneficial for innovation and employee engagement.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated với multiple perspectives (most significantly, however, another interesting development, on a more positive note)
• Vocabulary: Advanced và precise (revolutionized, profound ways, enabled real-time connectivity, geographical boundaries, democratized access, double-edged sword, digital overload, inundated with messages, perpetually available, mediate through screens, instantly disseminated, poorly worded, escalate into a crisis, digitally literate, tap into diverse perspectives, hierarchical barriers)
• Grammar: Complex structures flowing naturally (which has been particularly transformative, that comes from face-to-face interaction, tools like collaborative platforms)
• Critical Thinking: Balanced với both positive và negative aspects, acknowledges complexity, uses expert terminology (digital overload), considers multiple implications

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Perhaps most significantly, However, Another interesting development, On a more positive note
• Evaluative language: absolutely revolutionized, quite profound, particularly transformative, largely beneficial
• Metaphorical language: double-edged sword, raised the stakes, flattened

---

Question 2: Why do some people prefer not to take leadership roles?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Reasons / Causes
• Key words: prefer not to, leadership roles
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify 2-3 main reasons, có thể phân loại theo personality factors, practical concerns, hoặc societal factors

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“There are several reasons why people avoid leadership positions. First, leadership roles usually come with a lot of responsibility and stress. Some people don’t want to deal with the pressure of making important decisions that affect others. Second, being a leader takes a lot of time – you often have to work longer hours and might not have good work-life balance. Third, some people are naturally shy or introverted, so they feel uncomfortable being the center of attention or speaking in public. They might prefer to work independently or as a team member instead. Also, some people worry about dealing with conflicts or criticism from team members.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear với multiple reasons được list ra
• Vocabulary: Adequate (responsibility, stress, pressure, work-life balance, shy, introverted)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers relevant points nhưng explanations còn straightforward, thiếu nuance và sophisticated analysis

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is actually quite a multifaceted question, and I think the reasons vary considerably depending on individual circumstances and personality types.

For one thing, I’d say many people are simply daunted by the weight of responsibility that comes with leadership positions. Leading a team means being ultimately accountable for outcomes – both successes and failures – and not everyone is comfortable with that level of vulnerability and exposure to criticism. There’s this pervasive fear of letting people down or making decisions that might adversely affect others’ livelihoods, which can be psychologically taxing. Some individuals would rather contribute as skilled practitioners in their field without bearing that burden of accountability.

Beyond that, I think there’s often a very pragmatic calculation involved. Leadership roles typically demand significant time investment and can seriously encroach upon personal time. Many people have observed leaders in their organizations constantly tethered to their work, dealing with crises during evenings and weekends, and they consciously decide that the trade-offs aren’t worthwhile. They prioritize work-life balance over career advancement, which I think is actually quite a mature and self-aware choice.

From a personality perspective, some individuals simply aren’t wired for the interpersonal intensity that leadership requires. The thought of navigating office politics, mediating conflicts, or having difficult conversations with underperforming team members fills them with dread. These aren’t necessarily deficiencies – just different temperamental preferences. Someone who’s deeply introverted might find that leadership roles drain their energy rather than energize them, and they’re astute enough to recognize this mismatch.

There’s also, I think, a gendered dimension to this that’s worth acknowledging. Research suggests that women, in particular, often shy away from leadership positions due to perceived or actual biases and the ‘double bind‘ they face – being criticized for being too assertive or too accommodating. The structural barriers and lack of role models can make leadership seem less attainable or desirable.

Ultimately, I believe it’s important to destigmatize the choice not to pursue leadership. Not everyone needs to aspire to management – organizations need excellent individual contributors just as much as they need leaders, and there’s no inherent virtue in climbing the corporate ladder if it doesn’t align with your values or play to your strengths.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Extremely well-organized với multiple dimensions explored (responsibility fears, pragmatic concerns, personality factors, gender issues, concluding thoughts)
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated (multifaceted, daunted, weight of responsibility, vulnerability, pervasive fear, adversely affect, psychologically taxing, pragmatic calculation, encroach upon, tethered to their work, interpersonal intensity, temperamental preferences, drain their energy, double bind, structural barriers, destigmatize, inherent virtue)
• Grammar: Complex structures handled effortlessly (which can be psychologically taxing, someone who’s deeply introverted, being criticized for being too assertive, if it doesn’t align with)
• Critical Thinking: Shows sophisticated, multi-dimensional analysis với consideration of psychological, practical, personality, và social factors. Acknowledges research và ends with mature perspective about choice validity

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: For one thing, Beyond that, From a personality perspective, There’s also, Ultimately
• Tentative/Academic language: I’d say, quite a multifaceted question, I think, suggests that, worth acknowledging
• Abstract concepts: vulnerability, accountability, pragmatic calculation, temperamental preferences, structural barriers, inherent virtue

---

Theme 3: Future of Leadership

Question 1: What leadership qualities will be most important in the future?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Prediction / Future trends
• Key words: future, most important qualities
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify 2-3 key qualities, explain why they’ll matter given future trends (technology, globalization, climate change, etc.)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think future leaders will need to be adaptable because the world is changing very fast with new technology. They will also need to be good at using digital tools and understanding data. Another important quality is being open-minded and able to work with people from different cultures, because businesses are becoming more global. Environmental awareness will also be important because climate change is a big problem. Leaders should care about sustainability and making ethical decisions.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Identifies multiple qualities với brief justification
• Vocabulary: Basic (adaptable, changing fast, open-minded, environmental awareness)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Relevant points nhưng lacks depth, specific examples, và sophisticated reasoning

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Looking ahead, I’d argue that the leadership landscape will demand quite different competencies from what’s been valued traditionally.

Perhaps paramount will be what I’d call ‘adaptive intelligence‘ – the ability to navigate ambiguity and pivot quickly in response to rapid technological disruption and shifting market dynamics. Given the exponential pace of change we’re witnessing with artificial intelligence, automation, and emerging technologies, leaders who are cognitively flexible and can embrace uncertainty rather than seeking to control every variable will be far more successful than those who cling to rigid strategic plans.

Equally critical, I believe, will be cross-cultural competence and inclusive leadership. As workforces become increasingly diverse and geographically dispersed, leaders need to transcend cultural boundaries and create environments where diverse perspectives aren’t just tolerated but actively leveraged for innovation. This goes beyond superficial diversity initiatives – it requires genuine cultural intelligence and the ability to bridge vastly different worldviews.

Another dimension that I think will become increasingly salient is what might be called ‘purpose-driven leadership.’ Particularly among younger generations, there’s heightened scrutiny of whether organizations are contributing meaningfully to societal challenges rather than simply maximizing shareholder value. Future leaders will need to articulate compelling visions that resonate with people’s values and demonstrate authentic commitment to issues like environmental sustainability, social equity, and ethical technology use. Lip service won’t suffice – stakeholders will demand tangible action and accountability.

I’d also highlight digital fluency – not necessarily in the sense of technical coding skills, though that doesn’t hurt, but rather a sophisticated understanding of how technology is reshaping industries, human behavior, and competitive dynamics. Leaders who are digitally naive will find themselves increasingly marginalized, unable to make informed strategic decisions in a world where data-driven insights and technological platforms are fundamentally altering business models.

Lastly, and this might seem paradoxical given all the technology talk, but I actually think human-centric skills like emotional intelligence, empathy, and the ability to forge genuine connections will become even more valuable. As routine cognitive tasks become automated, the distinctly human capacities for nuanced judgment, ethical reasoning, and inspiring others through authentic relationships will be what differentiates exceptional leaders from merely competent ones.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptionally well-structured với clear progression through different qualities, each thoroughly explained with future context
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated và precise (paramount, adaptive intelligence, navigate ambiguity, exponential pace, cognitive flexibility, transcend cultural boundaries, increasingly salient, purpose-driven leadership, heightened scrutiny, lip service, tangible action, digitally naive, marginalized, data-driven insights, paradoxical, distinctly human, nuanced judgment)
• Grammar: Complex structures handled masterfully (Given the exponential pace, As workforces become increasingly diverse, what might be called, where diverse perspectives aren’t just tolerated but actively leveraged)
• Critical Thinking: Sophisticated analysis linking each quality to specific future trends, shows nuanced understanding of paradoxes (technology importance vs human skills), uses expert terminology, forward-thinking perspective

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Looking ahead, Perhaps paramount, Equally critical, Another dimension, Lastly, and this might seem paradoxical
• Predictive language: will demand, will be far more successful, will become increasingly salient, will need to
• Evaluative language: quite different, increasingly important, even more valuable
• Academic hedging: I’d argue, I believe, I think, might be called

---

Question 2: Do you think there will be a need for human leaders in the future, or could artificial intelligence replace them?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Speculation / Technology impact
• Key words: human leaders, artificial intelligence, replace
• Cách tiếp cận: Consider what AI can do vs what requires human qualities, balanced view

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I don’t think AI can completely replace human leaders, even though technology is becoming very advanced. AI is good at analyzing data and making logical decisions based on information, but leadership also requires emotional intelligence and understanding people’s feelings, which computers cannot do. Human leaders can inspire and motivate teams in ways that AI cannot. However, I think AI will become a helpful tool for leaders, helping them make better decisions by providing data and insights. So the future will probably involve humans and AI working together, with humans still in charge of important decisions about people.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position với supporting points
• Vocabulary: Adequate (analyzing data, logical decisions, emotional intelligence, inspire and motivate)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Relevant arguments nhưng lacks sophistication trong analysis, không explore đủ sâu về implications và complexity

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“This is a fascinating and increasingly relevant question that really gets to the heart of what leadership fundamentally entails. My view is that while AI will certainly transform leadership in profound ways, the notion of fully autonomous AI leaders is both unlikely and undesirable – at least in the foreseeable future.

To be fair, AI already excels at many tasks we traditionally associate with management – processing vast amounts of data, identifying patterns, optimizing resource allocation, and even predicting outcomes with remarkable accuracy. In purely analytical domains, AI can outperform humans by orders of magnitude. We’re already seeing algorithmic management in some organizations, where AI makes decisions about workflow optimization and performance evaluation.

However, what we might call the irreducibly human dimensions of leadership – the aspects that truly inspire followership – remain stubbornly resistant to automation. Leadership, at its core, is about navigating moral complexity, making value-laden judgments, and forging emotional connections that inspire trust and commitment. Can an AI grapple with ethical dilemmas that have no clear right answer? Can it demonstrate vulnerability or authentic empathy? Can it intuit the unspoken tensions in a room or adapt its communication style based on nuanced social cues? These are quintessentially human capacities that involve consciousness, intentionality, and lived experience – aspects of cognition we’re nowhere near replicating in machines.

Moreover, there’s a fundamental trust issue. Even if AI could theoretically make optimal decisions, would people willingly follow an AI leader? Research in human psychology suggests we have deep-seated needs for human connection and reciprocal relationships with our leaders. We want to feel that our leaders genuinely care about our wellbeing, that they can be held morally accountable, and that they share our human condition with all its messiness and imperfection. An AI, no matter how sophisticated, would lack this existential solidarity.

That said, I think the future will see increasingly sophisticated human-AI collaboration in leadership contexts. AI will serve as an incredibly powerful augmentation tool, handling analytical heavy lifting, flagging potential issues, and freeing human leaders to focus on the high-touch, high-judgment aspects of their roles. The most effective future leaders will be those who can skillfully leverage AI capabilities while retaining their distinctly human touch.

There’s also a somewhat philosophical point worth considering: leadership is inherently relational – it only exists in the dynamic between leaders and followers. Even if we could create AI with human-like consciousness (which is highly speculative), whether it should occupy leadership roles raises profound ethical questions about power, autonomy, and the future of human agency. I’d argue we should proceed with considerable caution before ceding such fundamental aspects of human society to non-human intelligence.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Masterful organization với clear thesis, fair acknowledgment của AI capabilities, detailed explanation về human irreplaceability, consideration of trust factors, vision for collaboration, và philosophical reflection
• Vocabulary: Exceptionally sophisticated (gets to the heart of, foreseeable future, orders of magnitude, algorithmic management, irreducibly human dimensions, stubbornly resistant, navigating moral complexity, value-laden judgments, quintessentially human, deep-seated needs, existential solidarity, augmentation tool, high-touch aspects, inherently relational, ceding fundamental aspects)
• Grammar: Complex structures handled effortlessly với multiple embedded clauses, questions used rhetorically for effect, conditional structures (even if AI could theoretically make)
• Critical Thinking: Extremely sophisticated analysis showing nuanced understanding của both AI capabilities and limitations, philosophical depth, consideration of psychological factors, ethical implications, balanced và thoughtful conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: To be fair, However, Moreover, That said, There’s also
• Hedging và speculation: My view is, at least in the foreseeable future, might call, would lack, I’d argue
• Rhetorical questions: Can an AI grapple with…? Can it demonstrate…?
• Philosophical language: irreducibly human, quintessentially human capacities, existential solidarity, inherently relational, profound ethical questions

---

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
spearhead	v	/ˈspɪəhed/	đứng đầu, lãnh đạo (dự án)	I was tasked with spearheading the sustainability initiative.	spearhead a project/campaign/initiative/effort
delegate	v	/ˈdelɪɡeɪt/	phân công, ủy thác	Good leaders know how to delegate tasks effectively.	delegate tasks/responsibilities/authority/power
stakeholder	n	/ˈsteɪkhoʊldər/	bên liên quan	We had to coordinate with multiple stakeholders including clients and suppliers.	key stakeholders, multiple stakeholders, engage stakeholders, manage stakeholder expectations
accountability	n	/əˌkaʊntəˈbɪləti/	trách nhiệm giải trình	Leaders must demonstrate accountability for their decisions.	accept accountability, hold someone accountable, lack of accountability, shared accountability
leverage	v	/ˈlevərɪdʒ/	tận dụng, khai thác	We need to leverage each team member’s unique strengths.	leverage strengths/resources/expertise/technology
navigate	v	/ˈnævɪɡeɪt/	điều hướng, xử lý	Leaders must navigate complex situations and conflicts.	navigate challenges/difficulties/uncertainty/complexity
mediate	v	/ˈmiːdieɪt/	hòa giải, làm trung gian	I had to mediate between team members with opposing views.	mediate conflicts/disputes/differences/negotiations
foster	v	/ˈfɔːstər/	nuôi dưỡng, khuyến khích	Effective leaders foster a culture of innovation and collaboration.	foster growth/development/relationships/innovation/trust
rally	v	/ˈræli/	tập hợp, khích lệ	During challenging times, leaders need to rally their teams.	rally support/troops/team members/the team
consensus	n	/kənˈsensəs/	sự đồng thuận	We tried to reach consensus through open discussion.	reach consensus, build consensus, lack of consensus, broad consensus
decisive	adj	/dɪˈsaɪsɪv/	quyết đoán	A decisive leader can make tough calls quickly.	decisive action/leadership/moment/factor
empower	v	/ɪmˈpaʊər/	trao quyền, tạo điều kiện	Good leaders empower their team members to take initiative.	empower employees/individuals/people/communities
resilience	n	/rɪˈzɪliəns/	sự kiên cường, khả năng phục hồi	Leadership requires emotional resilience during setbacks.	build resilience, demonstrate resilience, emotional resilience, organizational resilience
vision	n	/ˈvɪʒn/	tầm nhìn	Great leaders articulate a compelling vision for the future.	shared vision, clear vision, strategic vision, articulate a vision
facilitate	v	/fəˈsɪlɪteɪt/	tạo điều kiện thuận lợi	My role was to facilitate communication between departments.	facilitate discussion/communication/process/learning
milestone	n	/ˈmaɪlstoʊn/	cột mốc quan trọng	We set clear milestones to track our project progress.	reach a milestone, achieve a milestone, key milestone, important milestone
orchestrate	v	/ˈɔːrkɪstreɪt/	phối hợp, điều phối	The leader orchestrated a complex multi-team effort.	orchestrate efforts/activities/events/campaigns
decisive	adj	/dɪˈsaɪsɪv/	có tính quyết định	This was a decisive moment in the project timeline.	decisive action/moment/factor/victory
empathy	n	/ˈempəθi/	sự đồng cảm, thấu hiểu	Empathy is crucial for understanding team members’ concerns.	show empathy, lack empathy, deep empathy, empathy and compassion
autonomy	n	/ɔːˈtɑːnəmi/	quyền tự chủ	Team members appreciated having autonomy in their work.	grant autonomy, individual autonomy, professional autonomy, degree of autonomy

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
take the helm	nắm quyền lãnh đạo, điều khiển	When the previous manager left, I had to take the helm of the department.	8-9
at the coalface	ở tuyến đầu, trực tiếp làm việc	As a leader, it’s important to understand what’s happening at the coalface.	8-9
call the shots	đưa ra quyết định quan trọng	In leadership roles, you’re expected to call the shots on strategic matters.	7.5-8
step up to the plate	nhận trách nhiệm, đứng ra gánh vác	When crisis hit, she really stepped up to the plate and led us through it.	8-9
bring someone on board	thuyết phục ai đó tham gia, ủng hộ	It took time to bring all stakeholders on board with the new strategy.	7.5-8
think outside the box	suy nghĩ sáng tạo, không theo khuôn mẫu	Effective leaders encourage their teams to think outside the box.	7-8
rally the troops	động viên, tập hợp đội ngũ	When morale was low, the leader rallied the troops with an inspiring speech.	8-9
keep everyone on the same page	đảm bảo mọi người hiểu và thống nhất	Regular meetings helped keep everyone on the same page about project goals.	7.5-8
navigate uncharted waters	đối mặt với tình huống mới, chưa có tiền lệ	Leading during the pandemic meant navigating uncharted waters.	8-9
hit the ground running	bắt đầu làm việc ngay lập tức và hiệu quả	As a new leader, I needed to hit the ground running.	7.5-8
shoulder the responsibility	gánh vác trách nhiệm	Leaders must shoulder the responsibility for their team’s outcomes.	8-9
make tough calls	đưa ra quyết định khó khăn	Leadership often involves making tough calls under pressure.	8-9
strike a balance	tìm được sự cân bằng	Leaders need to strike a balance between being directive and collaborative.	7.5-8

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Sử dụng khi cần thời gian suy nghĩ hoặc muốn nói một cách thoughtful
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi muốn đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc thông tin bất ngờ
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi nói thật về quan điểm cá nhân
• 📝 I’d say that… – Cách mềm mại để đưa ra ý kiến
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Thể hiện đây là quan điểm cá nhân
• 📝 Looking back,… – Khi reflect về experience trong quá khứ

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, hơn nữa
• 📝 What’s more,… – Thêm nữa
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra còn
• 📝 Another aspect is… – Một khía cạnh khác là
• 📝 Equally important… – Quan trọng không kém

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Trong khi đúng là… chúng ta cũng cần xem xét
• 📝 To be fair,… – Để công bằng mà nói
• 📝 That being said,… – Dù vậy, mặc dù vậy
• 📝 Having said that,… – Sau khi nói điều đó

Để giải thích và làm rõ:

• 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là
• 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác
• 📝 To put it simply,… – Nói một cách đơn giản
• 📝 The thing is,… – Vấn đề là

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, xét tất cả mọi mặt
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, xét cho cùng
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng, sau cùng
• 📝 To sum up,… – Tổng kết lại

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional:

• Formula: If + past perfect, would + verb (hiện tại)
• Ví dụ: “If I hadn’t taken on that leadership role, I wouldn’t be as confident in managing teams today.”

Inversion for emphasis:

• Formula: Had + S + V3, S + would have + V3
• Ví dụ: “Had I known about the challenges beforehand, I would have prepared more thoroughly.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

• Formula: …, which/who + verb
• Ví dụ: “The project, which lasted six months, taught me invaluable leadership lessons.”

Reduced relative clauses:

• Formula: Noun + V-ing hoặc V3
• Ví dụ: “The strategies implemented during the project proved highly effective.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive với reporting verbs:

• It is thought/believed/said that… – Người ta cho rằng/tin rằng/nói rằng
• Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that emotional intelligence is crucial for effective leadership.”

Passive with modal verbs:

• Ví dụ: “Complex decisions should be made collaboratively rather than unilaterally.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ – để nhấn mạnh):

What-cleft:

• What I find most [adj], is… – Điều tôi thấy… nhất là
• Ví dụ: “What I found most challenging was managing conflicting opinions within the team.”

It-cleft:

• It was/is [noun/clause] that…
• Ví dụ: “It was the communication breakdown that caused most of our problems.”

The thing that-cleft:

• The thing that [impressed/surprised/challenged] me most was…
• Ví dụ: “The thing that surprised me most was how quickly team dynamics can shift.”

5. Inversion for Emphasis:

Negative adverbials:

• Never have I… / Rarely do we… / Seldom has there been…
• Ví dụ: “Never have I experienced such intense pressure as when leading that critical project.”

Only structures:

• Only by/when/after… did/can…
• Ví dụ: “Only by establishing clear communication channels could we overcome those obstacles.”

6. Participle Clauses:

Present participle (V-ing):

• Ví dụ: “Recognizing each team member’s strengths, I was able to delegate tasks effectively.”

Perfect participle (Having + V3):

• Ví dụ: “Having led several projects before, I was more prepared for the challenges.”

Bài viết này đã cung cấp cho bạn một bộ công cụ toàn diện để tự tin chinh phục chủ đề “Describe a time when you had to lead a group project” trong IELTS Speaking. Hãy nhớ rằng, việc học thuộc lòng các mẫu câu trả lời không phải là cách hiệu quả nhất. Thay vào đó, hãy hiểu rõ cách structure ý tưởng, sử dụng từ vựng phù hợp theo ngữ cảnh, và thực hành thường xuyên để phát triển khả năng nói tự nhiên. Tương tự như describe a time when you had to lead a project to success, việc chuẩn bị kỹ lưỡng các câu chuyện cá nhân và từ vựng liên quan sẽ giúp bạn tự tin hơn rất nhiều trong phòng thi.

Điều quan trọng là bạn cần thực hành speaking thường xuyên, ghi âm và tự đánh giá bản thân theo các tiêu chí chấm điểm chính thức. Nếu có thể, hãy tìm một study partner hoặc giáo viên để nhận feedback chi tiết. Đối với những ai đã từng describe an experience where you helped someone solve a problem, bạn sẽ thấy nhiều kỹ năng tương tự có thể áp dụng cho chủ đề leadership này.

Hãy nhớ rằng, examiner không chỉ đánh giá khả năng ngôn ngữ mà còn đánh giá khả năng tư duy phản biện, phân tích vấn đề từ nhiều góc độ, và truyền đạt ý tưởng một cách mạch lạc. Điều này cũng giống như khi bạn describe a time when you felt very proud of yourself – việc thể hiện cảm xúc và suy nghĩ sâu sắc sẽ giúp bài nói của bạn trở nên authentic và impressive hơn.

Cuối cùng, đừng quá lo lắng về việc mắc lỗi. Ngay cả những người đạt Band 8-9 cũng có thể có những self-correction hoặc small mistakes. Điều quan trọng là bạn có thể communicate effectively, maintain fluency, và demonstrate a wide range của vocabulary và grammar structures. Chúc bạn thành công trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking sắp tới!