IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe a Time When You Were Involved in a Decision-Making Process” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Mở bài

Chủ đề “Describe A Time When You Were Involved In A Decision-making Process” là một trong những đề bài phổ biến trong IELTS Speaking Part 2, thường xuyên xuất hiện trong các kỳ thi từ năm 2022 đến nay. Đây là dạng câu hỏi thuộc nhóm “describe an experience” – yêu cầu thí sinh kể về một tình huống thực tế khi bạn tham gia vào quá trình đưa ra quyết định quan trọng.

Tần suất xuất hiện: Chủ đề này có mức độ phổ biến cao, xuất hiện khoảng 15-20% trong các đề thi thực tế từ 2022 đến 2024, đặc biệt tại các địa điểm thi ở Việt Nam, Trung Quốc và các quốc gia Đông Nam Á. Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai: Cao, vì đây là chủ đề liên quan đến kỹ năng mềm và kinh nghiệm thực tế – những yếu tố mà giám khảo IELTS đánh giá cao.

Chủ đề này quan trọng vì nó đánh giá khả năng của bạn trong việc:

• Kể chuyện một cách có cấu trúc và logic
• Sử dụng từ vựng liên quan đến quá trình ra quyết định, làm việc nhóm, và giải quyết vấn đề
• Thể hiện kỹ năng phân tích và suy nghĩ phản biện
• Chia sẻ kinh nghiệm cá nhân một cách tự nhiên và thuyết phục

Những gì bạn sẽ học được trong bài viết này:

• 10+ câu hỏi thường gặp trong cả 3 Part liên quan đến decision-making
• Bài mẫu chi tiết theo 3 band điểm (6-7, 7.5-8, 8.5-9) với phân tích cụ thể
• Hơn 40 từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm để nói về quyết định và lựa chọn
• Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của một Examiner với 20 năm kinh nghiệm
• Những lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục

---

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về cuộc sống hàng ngày, sở thích, công việc hoặc học tập. Đây là phần “warm-up” để bạn làm quen với giám khảo và môi trường thi.

Đặc điểm chính:

• Câu hỏi đơn giản, liên quan đến bản thân
• Yêu cầu trả lời ngắn gọn nhưng đầy đủ (2-3 câu)
• Không cần phân tích sâu hay ý kiến phức tạp

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

• Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi ngay ở câu đầu tiên
• Mở rộng bằng lý do, ví dụ hoặc chi tiết bổ sung
• Giữ câu trả lời tự nhiên, không quá dài dòng

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn chỉ “Yes” hoặc “No” mà không giải thích
• Sử dụng từ vựng đơn giản, lặp đi lặp lại (good, nice, interesting)
• Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
• Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm do lo lắng

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you usually make decisions quickly or slowly?

Question 2: Who do you usually ask for advice when making important decisions?

Question 3: Have you ever made a decision that you regretted?

Question 4: Do you prefer to make decisions alone or with others?

Question 5: What kinds of decisions do you find most difficult to make?

Question 6: How do you feel when you have to make an important decision?

Question 7: Do you think young people today make decisions differently from older generations?

Question 8: Have you ever helped someone else make a decision?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

---

Question: Do you usually make decisions quickly or slowly?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp: quickly hay slowly
• Giải thích lý do tại sao (tính cách, kinh nghiệm)
• Đưa thêm ví dụ cụ thể nếu có thể

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

It depends on the situation. For small decisions like what to eat, I decide quickly. But for important things like choosing a university, I take more time because I want to think carefully about all the options.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời đủ ý, có sự phân biệt giữa các loại quyết định, có ví dụ cụ thể
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (small, important, think carefully), cấu trúc câu chưa đa dạng
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời rõ ràng và có logic nhưng thiếu từ vựng nâng cao và cấu trúc phức tạp. Sử dụng “it depends” là tốt nhưng cần phát triển thêm.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, it really varies depending on the nature of the decision. For day-to-day choices like what to have for lunch, I tend to be quite spontaneous and decide on the spot. However, when it comes to life-changing decisions such as my career path, I’m much more deliberate and like to weigh up all the pros and cons before committing to anything.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Từ vựng tinh tế: “varies depending on”, “spontaneous”, “deliberate”, “weigh up pros and cons”
  • Cấu trúc đa dạng: “it really varies…”, “when it comes to…”, “before committing”
  • Ý tưởng rõ ràng với sự phân biệt cụ thể giữa hai loại quyết định
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Câu trả lời mạch lạc, sử dụng discourse marker “Well” tự nhiên
  • Vocabulary: Sử dụng collocations chính xác (day-to-day choices, life-changing decisions, weigh up pros and cons)
  • Grammar: Cấu trúc phức tạp với mệnh đề quan hệ và contrast
  • Pronunciation: Các từ nhiều âm tiết thể hiện khả năng phát âm tốt

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• it varies depending on: tùy thuộc vào
• day-to-day choices: những lựa chọn hàng ngày
• spontaneous: tự phát, không cần suy nghĩ nhiều
• life-changing decisions: quyết định thay đổi cuộc đời
• deliberate: thận trọng, cân nhắc kỹ
• weigh up the pros and cons: cân nhắc ưu và nhược điểm

---

Question: Who do you usually ask for advice when making important decisions?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Nêu rõ người bạn thường hỏi ý kiến
• Giải thích tại sao bạn tin tưởng người đó
• Có thể thêm một ví dụ ngắn về lần bạn nhờ tư vấn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I usually ask my parents for advice because they have more experience than me. They always give me good suggestions and help me see things from different angles. Sometimes I also talk to my close friends if the decision is about my social life.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp, có lý do rõ ràng, đề cập đến nhiều nguồn tư vấn
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng khá basic (good suggestions, different angles, social life), thiếu depth trong giải thích
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Cấu trúc đơn giản, ý tưởng đầy đủ nhưng chưa impressive về mặt ngôn ngữ

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

My go-to person for advice is definitely my older sister. She has a wealth of experience in both her professional and personal life, so I really value her perspective on things. What I appreciate most is that she doesn’t just tell me what to do – she helps me think through the implications of each option. Of course, for career-related matters, I also seek guidance from my mentor at work, who has been instrumental in shaping my professional development.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Vocabulary phong phú: “go-to person”, “wealth of experience”, “value her perspective”, “think through implications”, “instrumental in”
  • Grammar đa dạng: relative clause (who has been…), emphasis structure (What I appreciate most is that…)
  • Ideas sâu sắc: không chỉ nói “ai” mà còn giải thích “tại sao” và “như thế nào”
  • Natural expressions: “definitely”, “of course” tạo sự tự nhiên
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Câu trả lời trôi chảy với linking phrases tự nhiên
  • Vocabulary: Collocations chính xác và sophisticated
  • Grammar: Mix của simple và complex structures
  • Content: Thể hiện critical thinking – không chỉ accept advice mà còn think through

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• my go-to person: người mà tôi luôn nhờ đến đầu tiên
• a wealth of experience: kho kinh nghiệm phong phú
• value someone’s perspective: đánh giá cao quan điểm của ai đó
• think through the implications: suy nghĩ kỹ về hậu quả
• career-related matters: những vấn đề liên quan đến sự nghiệp
• seek guidance from: tìm kiếm sự chỉ dẫn từ
• instrumental in: có vai trò quan trọng trong

---

Question: Have you ever made a decision that you regretted?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời Yes/No một cách thẳng thắn
• Kể ngắn gọn về quyết định đó (không cần chi tiết quá)
• Nêu bài học rút ra hoặc cảm nhận hiện tại

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I have. Last year, I decided to quit my part-time job without finding a new one first. It was a bad decision because I had financial problems for a few months. Now I know I should plan more carefully before making big changes.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời thẳng thắn, có ví dụ cụ thể, có bài học rút ra
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary đơn giản (bad decision, financial problems, plan carefully), thiếu emotional depth
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear communication nhưng limited range của vocabulary và grammar

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Yes, absolutely. Looking back, I’d say my biggest regret was turning down a study abroad opportunity in my second year of university. At the time, I was overly concerned about leaving my comfort zone and being away from family. In hindsight, it was a missed opportunity that could have broadened my horizons significantly. That experience taught me not to let fear hold me back from potentially life-enriching experiences. Now I try to be more open to taking calculated risks.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Rich vocabulary: “looking back”, “in hindsight”, “missed opportunity”, “broaden horizons”, “life-enriching experiences”, “calculated risks”
  • Reflective language: thể hiện sự trưởng thành và tự nhận thức
  • Grammar: Past perfect (was turning down), complex sentences
  • Emotional intelligence: thừa nhận sai lầm và học hỏi từ đó
• Tại sao Band 8-9:
  • Fluency: Natural flow với reflective phrases
  • Vocabulary: Idiomatic expressions (hold me back, comfort zone, broaden horizons)
  • Grammar: Variety of tenses showing time relationships
  • Critical thinking: Phân tích why và what learned

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• looking back / in hindsight: nhìn lại
• overly concerned about: quá lo lắng về
• missed opportunity: cơ hội bị bỏ lỡ
• broaden one’s horizons: mở rộng tầm nhìn
• hold someone back from: ngăn cản ai làm gì
• life-enriching experiences: trải nghiệm làm phong phú cuộc sống
• take calculated risks: chấp nhận rủi ro có tính toán

Nếu bạn quan tâm đến cách xử lý các tình huống khó khăn trong quá trình làm việc, bạn có thể tham khảo thêm về cách đối mặt với các vấn đề bất ngờ trong công việc để có thêm góc nhìn về kỹ năng giải quyết vấn đề.

---

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại quan trọng nhất trong IELTS Speaking, chiếm tỷ trọng lớn trong tổng điểm. Bạn có 1 phút chuẩn bị và 2-3 phút để nói không bị gián đoạn.

Thời gian:

• Chuẩn bị: 1 phút (được cho giấy và bút ghi chú)
• Nói: 2-3 phút (examiner sẽ báo stop sau 2 phút, nhưng tốt nhất nói đủ thời gian)

Đặc điểm:

• Độc thoại dài về một chủ đề cụ thể
• Phải trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points trong cue card
• Examiner không ngắt lời, chỉ lắng nghe và ghi chép
• Sau khi bạn nói xong, có thể có 1-2 câu hỏi follow-up ngắn

Chiến lược:

• 1 phút chuẩn bị: Ghi keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh. Lên outline cho mỗi bullet point.
• Nói từ 2-2.5 phút: Không quá ngắn (dưới 1.5 phút sẽ mất điểm), không quá dài
• Sử dụng thì quá khứ: Vì đề bài là “describe a time when…”
• Cấu trúc rõ ràng: Introduction → develop từng bullet point → conclusion
• Tự nhiên: Không học thuộc, có thể có pauses ngắn để suy nghĩ

Lỗi thường gặp:

• Không sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị hoặc không ghi chú gì
• Nói dưới 1.5 phút hoặc dừng lại chờ examiner hỏi
• Bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points
• Nói theo template cứng nhắc, nghe không natural
• Lạc đề, nói về điều không liên quan
• Quá nhiều hesitation hoặc repetition

Cue Card

Describe a time when you were involved in a decision-making process

You should say:

• What the decision was about
• Who else was involved in the process
• What factors you considered
• And explain how you felt about the final decision

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an experience/event (kể về một sự việc đã xảy ra)

Thì động từ: Chủ yếu là quá khứ (past simple, past continuous, past perfect) vì đây là sự kiện đã qua. Tuy nhiên, phần “explain how you felt” có thể dùng thêm hiện tại để nói về cảm nhận hiện tại.

Bullet points phải cover:

1. What the decision was about: Quyết định gì? (chọn trường, chọn công việc, quyết định trong dự án, quyết định gia đình, v.v.)
2. Who else was involved: Ai cùng tham gia? (gia đình, bạn bè, đồng nghiệp, giáo viên, v.v.) – Cần nói rõ vai trò của họ
3. What factors you considered: Những yếu tố gì được cân nhắc? (chi phí, thời gian, lợi ích dài hạn, rủi ro, v.v.) – Đây là phần quan trọng để show critical thinking
4. How you felt about the final decision: Cảm giác thế nào về quyết định cuối cùng? (satisfied, relieved, uncertain, proud, v.v.) – Đây là phần personal và emotional

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là phần giúp bạn ghi điểm cao nhất vì nó yêu cầu bạn phân tích cảm xúc và suy nghĩ sâu hơn, không chỉ kể sự việc. Bạn cần giải thích WHY bạn cảm thấy như vậy, không chỉ nói WHAT you felt.

Thí sinh IELTS đang chuẩn bị trả lời câu hỏi về quyết định quan trọng trong Speaking Part 2

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about a time when I had to decide which university to attend after finishing high school. This was about three years ago, and it was really important for my future.

The main people involved in this decision were my parents and my homeroom teacher. My parents wanted me to choose a university close to home because they were worried about me living alone. My teacher, on the other hand, suggested I should apply to universities in bigger cities because they have better programs.

When making this decision, I considered several factors. First, I thought about the quality of education and which universities had good programs for my major, which is business administration. Second, I considered the cost because some universities are quite expensive. Third, I thought about the location – whether I wanted to stay in my hometown or move to a new city. Finally, I also considered future job opportunities after graduation.

In the end, I decided to go to a university in Ho Chi Minh City, even though it was far from home. At first, I felt a bit nervous and uncertain because I had never lived away from my family before. However, now I feel it was the right decision. I’m satisfied with my choice because I’ve learned to be more independent, and the university has good facilities and experienced teachers. Looking back, I’m happy I made this decision even though it was difficult at the time.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Có cấu trúc rõ ràng, trả lời đủ các bullet points. Sử dụng một số linking words (first, second, however, in the end) nhưng còn đơn giản. Có flow tốt nhưng thiếu sophistication.
Lexical Resource	6-7	Từ vựng đủ để truyền đạt ý nhưng chưa impressive (important, worried, good programs, right decision). Có một số collocations đúng (quality of education, job opportunities) nhưng limited range.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Sử dụng đúng past tense, có một số câu phức (when making this decision, even though). Tuy nhiên, phần lớn là simple và compound sentences. Ít complex structures.
Pronunciation	6-7	Giả định rõ ràng và dễ hiểu, ít lỗi phát âm nghiêm trọng, nhưng có thể có accent ảnh hưởng đến intonation.

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points trong cue card
• ✅ Có cấu trúc logic: giới thiệu → người tham gia → factors → cảm nhận
• ✅ Đủ thời gian (khoảng 1.5-2 phút)
• ✅ Sử dụng đúng thì quá khứ cho hầu hết câu chuyện

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Từ vựng còn basic và repetitive (good, important, right)
• ⚠️ Thiếu idiomatic expressions và advanced vocabulary
• ⚠️ Cấu trúc câu đơn giản, ít variety
• ⚠️ Phần “explain feelings” chưa đủ sâu về emotional và reflective language

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to share an experience about a significant decision I was part of approximately two years ago, which involved choosing the direction for my university’s annual charity project.

The decision revolved around how to allocate our fundraising budget most effectively. Our student committee had raised a substantial amount through various events, and we needed to determine whether to support one major cause or distribute the funds among several smaller initiatives. This wasn’t just about money – it was about making a real impact in our community.

The decision-making process involved about eight members of our student union, including myself as the project coordinator. We also sought input from our faculty advisor and representatives from different charitable organizations. Each person brought a different perspective to the table – some were passionate about education for underprivileged children, while others advocated for environmental conservation or healthcare support.

When weighing our options, we considered multiple factors. Firstly, we looked at the immediate needs versus long-term benefits of each cause. We also evaluated the measurability of impact – could we actually track how our contribution made a difference? Additionally, we had to consider our team’s capacity to manage the project effectively. Budget constraints were another crucial factor, as we wanted to ensure maximum value for every dollar spent. Perhaps most importantly, we tried to assess which cause aligned best with our university’s values and our student body’s interests.

After several rounds of discussion and even some heated debates, we reached a consensus to focus on building a library for a rural primary school. Looking back, I feel genuinely proud of this decision. Initially, I had some doubts about whether we could complete such an ambitious project, but seeing it come to fruition was incredibly rewarding. What makes me most satisfied is that we didn’t just throw money at a problem – we created something tangible and sustainable that will benefit children for years to come. The experience taught me that good decision-making isn’t just about choosing the right answer, but about the process of considering diverse viewpoints and finding common ground.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Flow tự nhiên với minimal hesitation. Sử dụng cohesive devices hiệu quả (firstly, additionally, perhaps most importantly, looking back). Cấu trúc rõ ràng với progression logic từ background đến outcome.
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Vocabulary range rộng với nhiều collocations chính xác (make a real impact, weigh options, align with, come to fruition). Sử dụng less common words phù hợp (substantial, underprivileged, tangible, consensus). Có paraphrasing tốt.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Variety của structures: relative clauses, participle clauses, reported speech, passive voice. Mix tốt giữa simple và complex sentences. Minimal errors không ảnh hưởng communication.
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear pronunciation với natural rhythm và intonation. Word stress và sentence stress chính xác. Easy to understand với minimal L1 influence.

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“important decision”, “good programs”	“significant decision”, “making a real impact”, “substantial amount”
Grammar	“When making this decision, I considered…”	“When weighing our options, we considered…”, “After several rounds of discussion…”
Ideas	Liệt kê factors một cách đơn giản	Giải thích depth của từng factor với examples và analysis
Cohesion	First, second, third	Firstly, additionally, perhaps most importantly (more sophisticated)
Personal reflection	“I feel it was the right decision”	“Looking back, I feel genuinely proud… What makes me most satisfied is…”

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to recount a particularly challenging decision-making experience from about eighteen months ago, when I was at a crossroads regarding my career path. Specifically, I had to choose between accepting a promotion at my current company or taking a leap of faith by joining a startup in a completely different industry.

The crux of the decision centered on balancing stability and security against personal growth and fulfillment. The promotion offered a substantial salary increase and a clear trajectory within an established organization, whereas the startup position involved considerable financial risk but promised unprecedented learning opportunities and the chance to be part of something groundbreaking in the tech sector.

The deliberation involved not just myself, but also my family, particularly my spouse, whose support was absolutely crucial. We also engaged in extensive discussions with a couple of mentors – one being my former professor who had transitioned into entrepreneurship, and another being a senior colleague who had navigated similar crossroads earlier in his career. Each stakeholder brought invaluable insights: my spouse raised practical concerns about financial stability and work-life balance, while my mentors helped me look beyond the immediate implications and consider the long-term ramifications for my professional development.

The factors we mulled over were multifaceted and sometimes conflicting. On a practical level, we had to consider the financial cushion we’d need if the startup didn’t pan out, as well as the opportunity cost of potentially stagnating in my current role. Beyond the tangible aspects, I had to grapple with more abstract considerations – would I kick myself later for not pursuing something I was passionate about? How important was job security versus intellectual stimulation? We also factored in the market conditions and industry trends, recognizing that the tech sector, despite its volatility, was burgeoning with potential. Perhaps the most nuanced consideration was assessing my own risk tolerance and appetite for change at this particular juncture in my life.

After weeks of soul-searching and countless deliberations, I ultimately decided to embrace the uncertainty and join the startup. To say I was apprehensive would be an understatement – I experienced a maelstrom of emotions ranging from exhilaration to sheer terror at having burnt my bridges. However, looking back now, I can confidently say it was one of the most pivotal decisions I’ve ever made. What strikes me most is not just the professional skills I’ve acquired, but how the experience has fundamentally reshaped my perspective on calculated risk-taking and stepping outside one’s comfort zone. While there have certainly been challenges and setbacks, the sense of agency and ownership I feel over my career trajectory is immensely gratifying. This experience crystallized for me that sometimes the most rewarding decisions are the ones that initially fill you with doubt – they’re the ones that push you to grow in ways you never anticipated. It’s taught me that sound decision-making isn’t about eliminating all uncertainty, but rather about making peace with it and having the courage to commit fully to your chosen path.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Exceptional fluency với natural, effortless delivery. Sophisticated cohesive devices (Specifically, whereas, Beyond the tangible aspects, Perhaps the most nuanced). Ideas develop logically và seamlessly với complex argumentation.
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Sophisticated vocabulary sử dụng precisely và naturally (at a crossroads, take a leap of faith, grapple with, maelstrom of emotions, crystallized). Wide range của idiomatic language. Collocation chính xác hoàn hảo (unprecedented opportunities, calculated risk-taking, sound decision-making).
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range của structures: inversion (To say I was…), cleft sentences (What strikes me most…), participle phrases, conditional forms. Error-free hoặc errors extremely rare và không ảnh hưởng communication. Natural use của advanced grammar.
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Giả định native-like pronunciation với full range của phonological features. Natural intonation, rhythm, stress patterns. Effortless to understand.

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói flow tự nhiên không có hesitation đáng kể. Sử dụng discourse markers một cách tinh tế để guide listener qua các phần khác nhau của câu chuyện. Transitions giữa các ý mượt mà và logical.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• “at a crossroads” – idiom để diễn tả thời điểm phải đưa ra quyết định quan trọng, sophisticated hơn “important decision”
• “maelstrom of emotions” – metaphor mạnh mẽ, literary, thể hiện range rộng của vocabulary
• “burnt my bridges” – idiom native speakers thực sự dùng, không phải academic vocabulary cứng nhắc
• “crystallized” – verb tinh tế để nói về việc một ý tưởng trở nên clear, thay vì đơn giản “made clear”

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Inversion cho emphasis: “To say I was apprehensive would be an understatement” – advanced structure showing native-like control
• Cleft sentence: “What strikes me most is…” – focuses attention effectively
• Complex conditionals: Mixing of past, present, and hypothetical scenarios naturally

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Không chỉ kể story mà còn demonstrate deep reflection. Thảo luận về abstract concepts như “risk tolerance”, “opportunity cost”, “agency and ownership”. Thể hiện emotional intelligence và self-awareness. Conclusion philosophical về nature của decision-making itself.

🎭 Natural Language Use:
Sử dụng tentative language tự nhiên (“would be”, “I’d say”), colloquial expressions phù hợp (“kick myself later”), và emotional language authentic (“sheer terror”). Không nghe giống template hay rehearsed.

Trong quá trình ra quyết định, đặc biệt là các quyết định liên quan đến sự nghiệp, việc quản lý deadline chặt chẽ cũng là một yếu tố quan trọng cần cân nhắc, vì nó ảnh hưởng trực tiếp đến khả năng thực hiện các mục tiêu đã đề ra.

---

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Sau khi bạn hoàn thành phần độc thoại 2-3 phút, examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn để kết thúc Part 2 trước khi chuyển sang Part 3. Những câu này thường đơn giản và liên quan trực tiếp đến story bạn vừa kể.

Question 1: Would you make the same decision if you had to choose again?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I would make the same decision because it worked out well for me. I learned a lot and I don’t regret my choice.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely, I would. While there were certainly bumps along the road, the growth and insights I’ve gained have been invaluable. If anything, knowing what I know now, I might have made the leap even sooner. The experience has been transformative in ways I couldn’t have anticipated.

---

Question 2: How long did it take you to make this decision?

Band 6-7 Answer:
It took me about three weeks to decide. I spent a lot of time thinking about it and talking to different people.

Band 8-9 Answer:
It was quite a drawn-out process, actually – around five to six weeks of intensive deliberation. I wanted to be thorough rather than rush into something I might regret. In retrospect, that timeframe was necessary to weigh all the variables and come to terms with the implications of either choice.

---

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần thảo luận chuyên sâu nhất trong IELTS Speaking, nơi bạn phải thể hiện khả năng phân tích, so sánh, và đưa ra quan điểm về các vấn đề trừu tượng liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2.

Thời gian: 4-5 phút

Đặc điểm:

• Câu hỏi trừu tượng, sâu hơn, rộng hơn về society, culture, trends
• Không còn là câu chuyện cá nhân mà là discussion về general issues
• Examiner muốn thấy analytical thinking và ability to discuss complex ideas

Yêu cầu:

• Phân tích, so sánh các perspectives khác nhau
• Đưa ra opinions có supporting reasons và examples
• Thể hiện understanding về social contexts và broader implications
• Acknowledge complexity và different viewpoints

Chiến lược:

• Mở rộng câu trả lời: Mỗi answer nên 3-5 câu, không trả lời Yes/No ngắn gọn
• Use discourse markers: Well, Actually, I think, From my perspective
• Provide examples: Từ society, not just personal (In many countries…, These days…)
• Show balanced view: On the one hand… On the other hand… / While it’s true that… we also need to consider…
• Acknowledge complexity: It depends on…, It’s hard to generalize…, There are multiple factors…

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn, thiếu elaboration và supporting ideas
• Chỉ đưa ra một góc nhìn, không consider alternative perspectives
• Thiếu từ vựng abstract và academic để discuss complex topics
• Không connect ideas logically với discourse markers
• Đưa ra personal examples quá nhiều thay vì social examples
• Speak in absolutes (always, never, everyone) thay vì tentative language

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Các câu hỏi Part 3 thường được chia thành 2-3 themes liên quan đến chủ đề. Với topic “decision-making”, chúng ta có thể có các góc độ như:

Theme 1: Decision-Making in Modern Society

---

Question 1: Do you think people today have more difficulty making decisions than in the past?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare (past vs present) + Opinion
• Key words: more difficulty, today vs past, making decisions
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • State your position (yes/no/partially)
  • Explain reasons với comparison
  • Give examples từ modern life
  • Consider counterargument nếu có

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think yes, people today have more difficulty making decisions. This is because we have too many choices now. For example, in the past, people had limited options when choosing a career or buying something, but now we have hundreds of options on the internet. This makes it harder to decide because we worry about making the wrong choice. Also, social media makes us compare ourselves to others, which adds more pressure when making decisions.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position → Reason 1 + example → Reason 2
• Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng repetitive (harder, more, worry about)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Ý tưởng rõ ràng và relevant nhưng development chưa sophisticated. Thiếu deeper analysis và nuance.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Well, I’d say it’s a bit of a double-edged sword, actually. On one hand, modern life has inundated us with choices – from the mundane decision of what to watch on Netflix to life-altering choices about careers and relationships. This phenomenon, often called “the paradox of choice,” suggests that having an abundance of options can actually paralyze us rather than empower us. We’re constantly second-guessing ourselves and suffering from FOMO – the fear of missing out on potentially better alternatives.

That being said, I wouldn’t say decision-making was necessarily easier in the past. Previous generations faced their own challenges – they had less access to information, which meant decisions were often made based on limited data or traditional expectations rather than informed choice. What’s different now is the nature of the difficulty. Today, we’re overwhelmed by information and possibilities, whereas our grandparents were constrained by lack of options and resources.

I think the real issue isn’t the quantity of choices per se, but rather that we’ve not been adequately equipped with decision-making frameworks to handle this complexity. We need better education on how to prioritize, filter information, and be comfortable with our decisions without constantly questioning ourselves.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized: Complex position (double-edged sword) → Explain modern challenges + concept → Acknowledge past difficulties → Deeper insight về root cause
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (inundated with choices, paradox of choice, second-guessing, constrained by, adequately equipped)
• Grammar: Complex structures với variety: relative clauses, participle phrases, contrast structures
• Critical Thinking: Balanced view acknowledging multiple perspectives, introduces theoretical concept (paradox of choice), goes beyond surface level để analyze root causes

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: Well, actually, that being said, I think – natural conversational flow
• Tentative language: I’d say, I wouldn’t say, suggests that – shows thoughtful consideration
• Abstract nouns: abundance, phenomenon, alternatives, complexity, framework – academic but natural
• Hedging: a bit of, often, rather than – avoids absolute statements

Người trẻ đang suy ngĩ về nhiều lựa chọn khác nhau trong cuộc sống hiện đại

---

Question 2: Why do some people find it harder than others to make decisions?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Explain causes/reasons cho individual differences
• Key words: some people, harder, why
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • Identify multiple factors (personality, experience, context)
  • Explain each factor with reasoning
  • Use examples để illustrate
  • Show understanding của complexity

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think there are several reasons. First, personality plays a big role. Some people are naturally more confident and can decide quickly, while others are more careful and need more time. Second, experience matters. People who have made similar decisions before know what to do, but people without experience feel more uncertain. Finally, the importance of the decision also affects difficulty. Big decisions like choosing a career are harder than small ones like choosing what to eat.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear với first, second, finally
• Vocabulary: Basic (big role, naturally, matters, uncertain)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate explanation nhưng lacks depth. Ideas đúng nhưng development superficial.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

There are multiple factors at play here, and it’s quite fascinating actually. From a psychological standpoint, individual differences in risk tolerance and cognitive styles are hugely influential. Some people are naturally more risk-averse and tend to overthink potential negative outcomes, which can lead to what psychologists call “analysis paralysis.” They become so caught up in evaluating every possible scenario that they struggle to commit to any single option.

Beyond personality traits, I think past experiences significantly shape our decision-making confidence. Someone who has experienced positive outcomes from previous decisions tends to develop what we might call “decisional efficacy” – a belief in their ability to make good choices. Conversely, those who have faced negative repercussions from past decisions may develop decision-making anxiety that carries over into future situations.

Another crucial factor is the availability of support systems. People who have trusted advisors or strong social networks often find decisions easier because they can bounce ideas off others and gain different perspectives. Those who feel they must shoulder the burden alone naturally experience more difficulty.

It’s worth noting that context matters immensely too. The same person might be decisive in their professional sphere but indecisive in personal matters, depending on where their expertise and confidence lie. So it’s not always about being a “decisive” or “indecisive” person in general – it’s much more nuanced than that.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Multi-layered explanation: Psychological factors → Past experiences → Support systems → Contextual factors. Each point well-developed với explanation và examples
• Vocabulary: Academic yet natural (risk-averse, analysis paralysis, decisional efficacy, repercussions, shoulder the burden)
• Grammar: Sophisticated: relative clauses (what psychologists call), participle phrases (depending on where), complex nominals
• Critical Thinking: Goes beyond obvious answers, introduces psychological concepts, acknowledges complexity và individual variation

💡 Key Language Features:

• Introducing factors: From a psychological standpoint, Beyond personality traits, Another crucial factor
• Hedging and nuance: tends to, may develop, might be, it’s not always about
• Academic vocabulary in natural context: risk tolerance, cognitive styles, social networks
• Cause-effect language: lead to, shape, carries over into

Nếu quan tâm đến việc phát triển kỹ năng làm việc nhóm trong quá trình ra quyết định, bạn có thể tìm hiểu thêm về cách xử lý khi làm việc với thành viên khó tính trong nhóm để hiểu rõ hơn về dynamic trong collaborative decision-making.

---

Theme 2: Decision-Making in Different Life Stages

Question 3: How do young people and older people differ in the way they make decisions?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Compare and contrast (age groups)
• Key words: young people, older people, differ, way they make decisions
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • Identify key differences với balanced view
  • Explain underlying reasons for differences
  • Use specific examples for each group
  • Avoid stereotyping – use qualifiers

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Young people and older people make decisions differently. Young people are usually more willing to take risks because they have more time to recover if they make mistakes. They also rely more on their friends’ opinions and what they see on social media. Older people, on the other hand, are more careful and consider long-term consequences. They use their life experience to guide their decisions and are less influenced by others. For example, a young person might quickly decide to change jobs, but an older person would think more carefully about job security and retirement.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear comparison với young people first, then older people
• Vocabulary: Adequate (willing to take risks, rely on, careful, consequences)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Comparison rõ ràng và có example, nhưng explanation chưa deep. Thiếu nuance và sophisticated vocabulary.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Well, there are some notable distinctions, though I’d caution against overgeneralizing. Generally speaking, younger individuals tend to be more impulsive and spontaneous in their decision-making, often driven by immediate gratification rather than long-term planning. This isn’t necessarily a flaw – from an evolutionary perspective, youth is actually the optimal time to take calculated risks and explore different paths, as there’s more time to recover from setbacks. Young people are also heavily influenced by peer dynamics and social validation, particularly in this digital age where social media amplifies these pressures.

In contrast, older adults typically demonstrate what researchers call “crystallized intelligence” – they draw upon accumulated knowledge and experience to inform their choices. They’re often more methodical and deliberate, considering ramifications not just for themselves but for their families and broader networks. That said, this can sometimes lead to excessive caution or resistance to change, as they might be overly anchored to past experiences that may not fully apply to current contexts.

However, it’s crucial to recognize that these are broad generalizations. I’ve encountered remarkably prudent young people and surprisingly adventurous older individuals. Life circumstances often matter more than age itself – a young person shouldering family responsibilities might be far more risk-averse than a financially secure retiree looking to reinvent themselves. The digital divide also plays a role: younger generations have unprecedented access to information, which can both facilitate better-informed decisions and contribute to decision fatigue through information overload.

What’s interesting is that optimal decision-making might actually involve synthesizing both approaches – the boldness and adaptability of youth with the wisdom and foresight of age. That’s why intergenerational collaboration in decision-making can be so valuable.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated: Comparison of both groups → Acknowledge complexity → Challenge stereotypes → Deeper insight about synthesis
• Vocabulary: Rich và varied (impulsive, crystallized intelligence, ramifications, anchored to, unprecedented access, synthesizing)
• Grammar: Full range: conditional structures, participle phrases, relative clauses, passive voice naturally used
• Critical Thinking: Goes beyond simple comparison để question assumptions, acknowledge exceptions, introduce research concepts, propose integrated approach. Shows intellectual maturity.

💡 Key Language Features:

• Qualifying statements: Generally speaking, typically, often, might be – shows nuanced thinking
• Research-based language: from an evolutionary perspective, what researchers call, studies suggest
• Avoiding stereotypes: I’d caution against overgeneralizing, these are broad generalizations, it’s crucial to recognize
• Synthesis language: However, that said, what’s interesting, optimal approach might involve

---

Theme 3: Group vs Individual Decisions

Question 4: Is it better to make important decisions alone or with others?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion với comparison (alone vs with others)
• Key words: better, important decisions, alone, with others
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • Present balanced view (it depends)
  • Discuss advantages của both approaches
  • Give criteria for khi nào nên dùng approach nào
  • Conclude với nuanced position

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think it depends on the situation. Making decisions alone is good because you can decide quickly and don’t have to worry about other people’s opinions. You have full control. However, making decisions with others is also beneficial because you can get different perspectives and advice. Other people might see things you missed. For important decisions like business decisions, it’s usually better to involve other people because they can help you avoid mistakes. But for very personal decisions like choosing a partner, you should probably decide alone.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Balanced view với both sides presented
• Vocabulary: Simple và repetitive (good, beneficial, important, help you)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear reasoning và examples, but lacks sophistication trong vocabulary và depth của analysis. Conclusion hơi simplistic.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

That’s quite a nuanced question, and I don’t think there’s a one-size-fits-all answer. The optimal approach really hinges on several contextual factors.

Making decisions autonomously certainly has its merits. It allows for decisiveness and efficiency – you’re not bogged down by endless consultations or compromising your vision to accommodate multiple viewpoints. There’s also something to be said for taking ownership of your choices; when you decide alone, you bear full responsibility for the outcome, which can be empowering and lead to greater commitment to seeing it through. For decisions that are deeply personal or where you’re the one who will bear the consequences, autonomy is crucial.

On the flip side, collaborative decision-making offers distinct advantages. It mitigates the risk of blind spots and cognitive biases that we all possess. Drawing on collective wisdom can lead to more robust and well-rounded decisions. As the saying goes, “two heads are better than one” – and in complex situations, having diverse perspectives can illuminate aspects you might have overlooked. Furthermore, when people are involved in the decision-making process, they’re typically more invested in the outcome and buy into the implementation.

From my perspective, the key is knowing when to employ which approach. For time-sensitive decisions or those requiring specialized expertise that you possess, autonomous decision-making is probably preferable. However, for high-stakes decisions with far-reaching implications that affect multiple stakeholders, inclusive decision-making tends to yield better results. The sweet spot might actually be a hybrid approach – soliciting input from others while reserving final decision-making authority yourself. This way, you benefit from diverse perspectives while avoiding decision-making by committee, which can dilute accountability and lead to suboptimal compromises.

Ultimately, I think the sign of good judgment is knowing when to trust your own instincts and when to leverage the wisdom of others. It’s less about choosing one approach over the other and more about flexibly adapting your strategy to the situation at hand.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptional organization: Acknowledge complexity → Autonomous benefits → Collaborative benefits → Context-dependent analysis → Sophisticated conclusion
• Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated (nuanced, hinges on, bogged down by, mitigates risk, cognitive biases, far-reaching implications, dilute accountability)
• Grammar: Full range expertly deployed: inversion (There’s something to be said for), cleft sentences (The key is knowing when…), conditional forms, passive constructions
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis considering pros/cons, contexts, hybrid approaches. Uses idiomatic expressions naturally (two heads are better than one, sweet spot). Shows mature understanding của decision-making complexity.

💡 Key Language Features:

• Acknowledging complexity: That’s quite a nuanced question, I don’t think there’s a one-size-fits-all answer
• Balanced discussion: certainly has its merits, on the flip side, from my perspective
• Idiomatic expressions: bogged down by, on the flip side, sweet spot, two heads are better than one
• Academic collocations: mitigates the risk, cognitive biases, far-reaching implications, suboptimal compromises

Trong bối cảnh làm việc nhóm và ra quyết định chung, việc dẫn dắt một dự án nhóm thành công đòi hỏi kỹ năng phối hợp và tổng hợp ý kiến từ nhiều thành viên khác nhau.

---

Question 5: Do you think technology has changed the way people make decisions?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion về impact of technology + change over time
• Key words: technology, changed, way people make decisions
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • State clear position (yes với qualifications)
  • Explain specific ways technology has impacted
  • Discuss both positive và negative impacts
  • Consider future implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, definitely. Technology has changed how we make decisions a lot. Now we can search for information online before making any decision. For example, before buying something, we read reviews and compare prices on different websites. This helps us make better choices. Also, we can ask for advice from people online, not just our friends and family. However, sometimes there is too much information online, which makes it confusing. We also rely too much on technology and don’t trust our own judgment anymore.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear với position → positive impacts → negative impacts
• Vocabulary: Basic (a lot, better choices, too much, rely on)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Relevant points và examples nhưng limited range của language. Analysis superficial without deeper exploration.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

Absolutely, and the transformation has been profound and multifaceted. Technology has fundamentally altered not just how we make decisions, but also what decisions we can make and the timeframes in which we make them.

On the positive side, we now have unprecedented access to information that can inform our choices. Gone are the days when you had to rely solely on word-of-mouth or limited local options. Today, before making virtually any decision – from which restaurant to dine at to which career path to pursue – we can tap into vast repositories of data, user reviews, expert opinions, and comparative analyses. Decision-making tools like pros-and-cons generators, cost-benefit calculators, and even AI-powered recommendation systems can help us systematically evaluate our options. This democratization of information has leveled the playing field in many ways.

However, this technological revolution is a double-edged sword. We’re now facing what I’d call “digital decision fatigue.” The sheer volume of available information can be paralyzing rather than empowering. We’re constantly bombarded with targeted advertising and algorithmically curated content that subtly influences our choices in ways we may not even realize. There’s also the phenomenon of “echo chambers” – where algorithms reinforce our existing biases by showing us information that aligns with our previous behaviors, potentially limiting the breadth of perspectives we consider.

Perhaps more concerning is the erosion of deliberative thinking. The instant gratification culture fostered by technology means we’re accustomed to making snap decisions based on surface-level information rather than engaging in deep, reflective thought. We’ve outsourced much of our cognitive processing to devices and apps, which might be diminishing our innate decision-making capacities.

Looking ahead, I think the challenge will be striking a balance – harnessing technology as a tool to enhance our decision-making while preserving the human elements of intuition, values-based reasoning, and critical thinking. We need to become more digitally literate – not just in using technology, but in understanding its limitations and potential biases. The future of decision-making will likely involve human-AI collaboration, where technology augments rather than replaces human judgment.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Highly sophisticated: Clear position → Positive transformations với specific examples → Critical analysis of negatives → Forward-looking conclusion. Each section well-developed với multiple layers.
• Vocabulary: Exceptional range (profound, multifaceted, repositories of data, democratization of information, algorithmically curated, erosion of deliberative thinking, innate capacities, augments)
• Grammar: Full range masterfully used: inversion (Gone are the days), complex nominals (the sheer volume of…), participle phrases, passive voice for effect
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis examining surface level và deeper implications. Introduces concepts (echo chambers, digital decision fatigue, human-AI collaboration). Historical perspective (before vs now) và future orientation. Balanced yet nuanced view.

💡 Key Language Features:

• Emphasis structures: Absolutely, fundamentally altered, perhaps more concerning
• Contrasting ideas: On the positive side, however, looking ahead
• Metaphorical language: double-edged sword, level the playing field, echo chambers
• Academic yet accessible: democratization of information, erosion of deliberative thinking, augments rather than replaces

Người dùng smartphone đang tìm kiếm thông tin để đưa ra quyết định

---

Theme 4: Education and Decision-Making Skills

Question 6: Should schools teach students how to make good decisions?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion về education policy + justification
• Key words: should, schools teach, students, make good decisions
• Cách tiếp cận:
  • State position clearly (yes với reasoning)
  • Explain why it’s important
  • Discuss how it could be implemented
  • Address potential challenges

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think schools should definitely teach this skill. Decision-making is very important in life, but most schools only focus on academic subjects. If students learn how to make good decisions at school, they will be better prepared for adult life. Teachers could use real-life examples and let students practice making decisions in a safe environment. For example, they could give students projects where they need to make choices and explain their reasoning. This would help students develop critical thinking skills.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position → reason → suggestion for implementation → benefit
• Vocabulary: Adequate (very important, focus on, prepared for, real-life examples)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Logical argument với relevant points, but limited sophistication trong language và depth của reasoning.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

I’d argue strongly that this should be a cornerstone of modern education, yet it’s woefully neglected in most curricula. The ability to make sound decisions is arguably one of the most critical life skills, yet we often assume students will somehow pick it up along the way, which is a significant oversight.

The rationale for including decision-making education is compelling. First, unlike previous generations who followed more prescribed paths, today’s young people face an increasingly complex and uncertain world where they’ll need to make consequential choices earlier and more frequently. From navigating social media pressures to managing financial decisions to choosing career paths in rapidly evolving job markets, they need robust frameworks for evaluating options and weighing trade-offs.

In terms of implementation, I envision this going beyond just theoretical instruction. It should be woven into the curriculum through practical, experiential learning. For instance, schools could create simulated scenarios where students must make decisions with real consequences – perhaps managing budgets for school events, or participating in youth councils where they make actual policy decisions. Case-based learning, where students analyze both successful and failed decisions from history, business, and everyday life, would be invaluable. We should also explicitly teach concepts like cognitive biases, opportunity costs, risk assessment, and ethical considerations in decision-making.

Moreover, this education should include emotional intelligence components – helping students understand how emotions influence decisions and developing strategies for managing stress and uncertainty that inevitably accompany important choices. Collaborative decision-making skills are equally crucial, teaching students when and how to seek input, build consensus, and navigate disagreements.

The challenge, of course, is that this requires teacher training and curriculum space in already overburdened school systems. However, I’d argue that decision-making skills are so fundamental that they should be integrated across subjects rather than being a standalone course. A math teacher can discuss decision-making in problem-solving, a history teacher can analyze historical decisions and their consequences, and so on.

Ultimately, equipping students with decision-making competencies is an investment in their future agency and resilience. In a world where they’ll face unprecedented challenges – from climate change to career disruptions – the ability to make thoughtful, informed decisions will be indispensable.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Masterfully organized: Strong position → Compelling rationale → Detailed implementation suggestions → Emotional intelligence dimension → Address practical challenges → Powerful conclusion
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise (cornerstone, woefully neglected, prescribed paths, robust frameworks, case-based learning, cognitive biases, indispensable)
• Grammar: Full range: conditional structures, relative clauses, participle phrases, passive constructions, complex nominals naturally deployed
• Critical Thinking: Comprehensive analysis covering multiple dimensions (theoretical, practical, emotional, logistical). Addresses counterarguments. Connects to broader social contexts. Proposes concrete solutions while acknowledging constraints. Shows deep understanding của educational theory và practice.

💡 Key Language Features:

• Strong positioning: I’d argue strongly, arguably, ultimately
• Academic discourse: The rationale for, in terms of implementation, moreover, the challenge
• Educational terminology: curricula, experiential learning, case-based learning, standalone course, integrated across subjects
• Sophisticated vocabulary: woefully neglected, indispensable, unprecedented, agency and resilience

Để phát triển kỹ năng ra quyết định hiệu quả, sinh viên cũng cần học cách dẫn dắt một dự án đến thành công, nơi họ phải đưa ra nhiều quyết định quan trọng và chịu trách nhiệm về kết quả.

---

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
decision-making process	n	/dɪˈsɪʒən ˈmeɪkɪŋ ˈprəʊses/	quá trình ra quyết định	The decision-making process took several weeks.	involved in the ~, effective ~, collaborative ~, streamline the ~
weigh the pros and cons	v phrase	/weɪ ðə prəʊz ənd kɒnz/	cân nhắc ưu và nhược điểm	Before accepting the job, I carefully weighed the pros and cons.	carefully ~, thoroughly ~, need to ~, take time to ~
calculated risk	n	/ˈkælkjuleɪtɪd rɪsk/	rủi ro có tính toán	Starting a business involves taking calculated risks.	take a ~, willing to take ~, avoid ~, assess ~
at a crossroads	idiom	/æt ə ˈkrɒsrəʊdz/	ở ngã rẽ quan trọng	I’m at a crossroads in my career right now.	stand at a ~, find oneself at a ~, reach a ~
make a snap decision	v phrase	/meɪk ə snæp dɪˈsɪʒən/	quyết định nhanh chóng, vội vàng	I had to make a snap decision when the opportunity arose.	forced to ~, shouldn’t ~, regret making a ~, avoid making ~
deliberate	adj	/dɪˈlɪbərət/	thận trọng, cân nhắc kỹ	She’s very deliberate in her approach to important decisions.	~ approach, ~ process, ~ consideration, be ~ about
spontaneous	adj	/spɒnˈteɪniəs/	tự phát, không cần suy nghĩ	His spontaneous decisions sometimes lead to great adventures.	~ decision, ~ choice, be ~ about, too ~
ramifications	n	/ˌræmɪfɪˈkeɪʃənz/	hậu quả, tác động (thường dài hạn)	We need to consider the ramifications of this choice.	long-term ~, serious ~, consider the ~, understand the ~
factor in	phrasal v	/ˈfæktər ɪn/	tính đến, xem xét	We factored in the cost when making our decision.	need to ~ something, failed to ~ something, ~ all aspects
consensus	n	/kənˈsensəs/	sự đồng thuận	After much discussion, we reached a consensus.	reach a ~, build ~, achieve ~, arrive at a ~, broad ~
stakeholder	n	/ˈsteɪkhəʊldə(r)/	bên liên quan	All stakeholders were consulted before the decision.	key ~, involve ~, consult ~, ~ input, various ~
analysis paralysis	n	/əˈnæləsɪs pəˈræləsɪs/	tình trạng suy nghĩ quá nhiều không quyết định được	He suffered from analysis paralysis and couldn’t choose.	suffer from ~, overcome ~, avoid ~, lead to ~
leap of faith	idiom	/liːp əv feɪθ/	bước nhảy vọt dựa vào niềm tin	Changing careers was a real leap of faith.	take a ~, require a ~, represents a ~, big ~
second-guess	v	/ˈsekənd ɡes/	nghi ngờ, đặt câu hỏi về quyết định đã đưa ra	I tend to second-guess myself after making big decisions.	~ oneself, constantly ~, shouldn’t ~, stop second-guessing
opportunity cost	n	/ˌɒpəˈtjuːnəti kɒst/	chi phí cơ hội	Every choice has an opportunity cost.	consider the ~, calculate ~, high ~, understand ~
risk-averse	adj	/rɪsk əˈvɜːs/	e ngại rủi ro	Risk-averse individuals prefer stable options.	~ investor, ~ person, tend to be ~, highly ~
decisive	adj	/dɪˈsaɪsɪv/	quyết đoán	A good leader needs to be decisive.	~ action, ~ leader, ~ moment, be ~ about
hedge one’s bets	idiom	/hedʒ wʌnz bets/	giảm thiểu rủi ro bằng cách có nhiều lựa chọn	He hedged his bets by applying to multiple universities.	~ by doing something, wise to ~, strategy of hedging ~
gut feeling	n	/ɡʌt ˈfiːlɪŋ/	cảm giác, trực giác	Sometimes you have to trust your gut feeling.	trust your ~, follow your ~, strong ~, ignore one’s ~
long-term implications	n	/lɒŋ tɜːm ˌɪmplɪˈkeɪʃənz/	tác động dài hạn	We must consider the long-term implications.	consider ~, understand ~, serious ~, potential ~

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
burn one’s bridges	phá hỏng mọi con đường quay lại, không còn cơ hội khác	I didn’t want to burn my bridges with my old company, so I left on good terms.	8-9
on the fence	còn do dự, chưa quyết định	I’m still on the fence about whether to accept the job offer.	7-8
a double-edged sword	con dao hai lưỡi (có cả tốt và xấu)	Having too many choices is a double-edged sword.	8-9
sleep on it	ngủ một đêm suy nghĩ	It’s a big decision – why don’t you sleep on it?	7-8
go with one’s gut	theo trực giác	When logic fails, sometimes you just have to go with your gut.	7-8
take the plunge	quyết tâm làm điều gì đó quan trọng/mạo hiểm	After years of planning, she finally took the plunge and opened her own business.	7.5-8.5
put all eggs in one basket	đặt tất cả hy vọng vào một chỗ	It’s risky to put all your eggs in one basket when investing.	7-8
think twice before	suy nghĩ kỹ trước khi	You should think twice before making such a drastic change.	6.5-7.5
in two minds about	phân vân, lưỡng lự	I’m in two minds about whether to pursue further education or start working.	7-8
bite the bullet	chấp nhận làm điều khó khăn/khó chịu	I knew I had to bite the bullet and have that difficult conversation.	7.5-8.5
the lesser of two evils	cái ác nhỏ hơn trong hai lựa chọn xấu	Accepting the lower salary was the lesser of two evils.	7.5-8.5
throw caution to the wind	bất chấp rủi ro	Sometimes in life, you need to throw caution to the wind and take a chance.	8-9
keep one’s options open	giữ nhiều lựa chọn	I’m keeping my options open by applying to several graduate programs.	7-8
sit on the fence	trì hoãn quyết định, không muốn chọn bên	You can’t sit on the fence forever – eventually you’ll have to decide.	7-8

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well,… – Khi cần một chút thời gian suy nghĩ: “Well, that’s an interesting question…”
• 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc thông tin bất ngờ: “Actually, I think it’s more complicated than that…”
• 📝 To be honest,… – Khi nói thật lòng: “To be honest, I’ve struggled with this myself…”
• 📝 I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm: “I’d say that decision-making skills can be learned…”
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Khi nêu quan điểm cá nhân: “From my perspective, both approaches have merit…”

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó: “On top of that, we also need to consider financial factors…”
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa: “What’s more, the decision affects not just me but my family too…”
• 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến: “Not to mention the time commitment involved…”
• 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra còn: “Beyond that, there are ethical considerations…”
• 📝 Furthermore,… / Moreover,… – Hơn nữa (formal hơn): “Furthermore, this approach has been proven effective…”

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác: “On the one hand, it offers security; on the other hand, it limits growth…”
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Trong khi đúng là… chúng ta cũng cần xem xét: “While it’s true that experience matters, we also need to consider individual circumstances…”
• 📝 That said,… / That being said,… – Dù vậy: “That said, there are exceptions to every rule…”
• 📝 Having said that,… – Đã nói như vậy thì: “Having said that, I think both approaches can work…”

Để kết luận:

• 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại: “All in all, I believe it was the right choice…”
• 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì: “At the end of the day, you have to do what feels right…”
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng: “Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal values…”
• 📝 In the final analysis,… – Xét cho cùng: “In the final analysis, both factors are important…”

Để thể hiện sự không chắc chắn hoặc cân nhắc:

• 📝 It depends on… – Tùy thuộc vào: “It depends on the specific situation…”
• 📝 I suppose… – Tôi cho là: “I suppose it varies from person to person…”
• 📝 I’d imagine… – Tôi tưởng tượng rằng: “I’d imagine younger people might approach it differently…”
• 📝 It’s hard to say, but… – Khó mà nói, nhưng: “It’s hard to say, but I think both have their place…”

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional (mixing time references):

• Formula: If + Past Perfect, would + V (base form)
• Ví dụ: “If I had known the full implications at the time, I would still make the same decision today.”
• Khi nào dùng: Khi muốn nói về past condition và present result

Inversion for emphasis:

• Formula: Had I known… / Were I to… / Should the situation arise…
• Ví dụ: “Had I been more experienced, I might have approached it differently.”
• Khi nào dùng: Formal speaking, để tạo emphasis và sophistication

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

• Formula: …, which/who…,
• Ví dụ: “My mentor, who has over 20 years of experience, advised me to weigh all options carefully.”
• Khi nào dùng: Thêm thông tin bổ sung về người hoặc vật

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive với reporting verbs:

• Formula: It is thought/believed/said that…
• Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that collaborative decision-making leads to better outcomes.”
• Khi nào dùng: Khi muốn nói về general beliefs, không nhấn mạnh ai nói

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What-cleft cho emphasis:

• Formula: What + S + V + is/was…
• Ví dụ: “What I find most challenging about decision-making is managing the uncertainty.”
• Khi nào dùng: Để nhấn mạnh một phần cụ thể của câu

The thing that-cleft:

• Formula: The thing that + S + V + is…
• Ví dụ: “The thing that made this decision difficult was the conflicting advice I received.”
• Khi nào dùng: Tương tự what-cleft nhưng slightly less formal

5. Participle Phrases (Cụm phân từ):

Present participle cho simultaneous actions:

• Formula: V-ing…, S + V
• Ví dụ: “Considering all the factors involved, I decided to accept the offer.”
• Khi nào dùng: Khi hai hành động xảy ra cùng lúc hoặc có quan hệ cause-effect

Perfect participle cho earlier action:

• Formula: Having + V3…, S + V
• Ví dụ: “Having consulted with my family, I felt more confident about my choice.”
• Khi nào dùng: Khi muốn nhấn mạnh hành động này xảy ra trước hành động kia

6. Inversion After Negative Adverbials:

• Formula: Not only… but also / Rarely / Seldom / Never + auxiliary + S + V
• Ví dụ: “Not only did I consider the financial aspects, but I also thought about long-term career prospects.”
• Khi nào dùng: Formal speaking, để tạo dramatic effect và sophistication

---

Chiến Lược Đạt Điểm Cao

Những Lỗi Thường Gặp Cần Tránh

Lỗi về Content và Ideas:

1. Trả lời không đúng câu hỏi: Lạc đề hoặc chỉ trả lời một phần

   • ❌ Câu hỏi: “Describe a time when you WERE INVOLVED in a decision-making process”
   • ❌ Lỗi: Chỉ kể về quyết định bạn tự đưa ra một mình
   • ✅ Đúng: Kể về quyết định có sự tham gia của nhiều người, nhấn mạnh collaborative process

2. Thiếu specificity: Nói chung chung, không có chi tiết cụ thể

   • ❌ “It was a difficult decision and took some time”
   • ✅ “The deliberation process spanned approximately three weeks, during which we held five formal meetings…”

3. Bỏ sót bullet points: Không trả lời đủ tất cả yêu cầu trong cue card

   • Part 2 có 4 bullet points – phải cover đủ cả 4

Lỗi về Vocabulary:

1. Lặp từ quá nhiều: Dùng đi dùng lại các từ đơn giản

   • ❌ Important decision, important choice, important factor
   • ✅ Significant decision, crucial choice, critical factor

2. Dùng từ không natural: Vocabulary quá academic hoặc không phù hợp context

   • ❌ “I utilized my cognitive faculties to ascertain the optimal solution”
   • ✅ “I carefully thought through all the options to find the best solution”

3. Collocation sai: Kết hợp từ không đúng cách native speakers dùng

   • ❌ “do a decision”, “take a conclusion”
   • ✅ “make a decision”, “reach a conclusion”

Lỗi về Grammar:

1. Nhầm thì: Đặc biệt trong Part 2 khi kể về past event

   • ❌ “So I decide to accept the offer” (khi kể chuyện quá khứ)
   • ✅ “So I decided to accept the offer”

2. Thiếu variety: Chỉ dùng simple sentences

   • ❌ “I made a decision. It was difficult. I talked to my parents. They helped me.”
   • ✅ “The decision I made was quite difficult, so I consulted my parents, who provided valuable guidance.”

Lỗi về Fluency:

1. Quá nhiều hesitation: Um, uh, er liên tục

   • Tip: Dùng discourse markers thay vì um: “Well…”, “Actually…”, “You know…”

2. Self-correction quá nhiều: Sửa lại câu nói liên tục

   • Tip: Chấp nhận minor errors, tiếp tục nói thay vì cứ quay lại sửa

3. Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm: Ảnh hưởng đến intelligibility

   • Tip: Nói với tốc độ vừa phải, có pauses tự nhiên ở các punctuation points

Lỗi về Pronunciation:

1. Word stress sai: Ví dụ: DEcision (sai) vs deCIsion (đúng)
2. Sentence stress không tự nhiên: Nhấn mạnh sai từ trong câu
3. Intonation monotone: Giọng nói phẳng, không có variation

Tips Từ Examiner

Trong 1 phút chuẩn bị Part 2:

• ✍️ Ghi keywords cho mỗi bullet point, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
• ✍️ Note down 1-2 specific details/numbers để sound authentic
• ✍️ Plan opening sentence và closing sentence
• ✍️ Đánh dấu từ vựng tốt bạn muốn sử dụng

Trong khi nói:

• 🎯 Maintain eye contact với examiner, don’t just read notes
• 🎯 Speak to examiner như một conversation, not a performance
• 🎯 Don’t worry về minor grammar mistakes – fluency quan trọng hơn
• 🎯 If you don’t know a word, paraphrase – đừng dừng lại
• 🎯 Show enthusiasm và personality – examiners are human too!

Đối với Part 3:

• 💡 It’s okay to say “That’s an interesting question, let me think…”
• 💡 Develop ideas với structure: Opinion → Reason → Example → Concluding thought
• 💡 Show different perspectives: “Some people think… while others believe…”
• 💡 Use tentative language: “I’d say…”, “It seems to me…”, “In my view…”
• 💡 Không sợ disagree respectfully với assumptions trong câu hỏi

Lộ Trình Chuẩn Bị

4-6 tuần trước thi:

• Làm quen với format và timing của cả 3 Parts
• Xây dựng topic vocabulary banks cho 10-15 common topics
• Practice recording yourself – listen và identify areas to improve
• Study sample answers nhưng không học thuộc

2-3 tuần trước thi:

• Practice với timer – đảm bảo Part 2 nói đủ 2 phút
• Focus vào pronunciation và intonation
• Review grammar structures và practice using them naturally
• Mock tests với partners hoặc tutors

1 tuần trước thi:

• Review các topic có thể xuất hiện trong quý hiện tại
• Practice Part 3 questions – develop ability to think và speak simultaneously
• Relax và maintain confidence – don’t cram new vocabulary
• Get good sleep và arrive early on test day

Trên hết: Remember that IELTS Speaking đánh giá communication ability, not perfection. Examiners want to see that you can express ideas clearly, naturally, và effectively. Be yourself, be confident, và enjoy the conversation!

---

Chủ đề “Describe a time when you were involved in a decision-making process” là một trong những đề bài quan trọng và thực tế nhất trong IELTS Speaking. Hy vọng với những phân tích chi tiết, sample answers theo từng band điểm, và vocabulary phong phú trong bài viết này, bạn đã có thêm confidence và tools cần thiết để đạt điểm cao trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking của mình. Hãy nhớ rằng, practice makes perfect – càng luyện tập nhiều, bạn càng tự tin và fluent hơn!