IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời "Describe An Important Piece Of News You Heard" - Bài Mẫu Band 6-9 » IELTS.NET

Chủ đề tin tức là một trong những đề tài xuất hiện thường xuyên nhất trong IELTS Speaking, đặc biệt là ở Part 2 và Part 3. Với sự phát triển của truyền thông số và mạng xã hội, giám khảo thường xuyên đánh giá khả năng thí sinh phân tích, đánh giá thông tin và đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân về các sự kiện thời sự. Chủ đề “Describe An Important Piece Of News You Heard” không chỉ kiểm tra vốn từ vựng về media và current affairs mà còn đòi hỏi kỹ năng kể chuyện mạch lạc và khả năng giải thích tại sao tin tức đó quan trọng.

Mục lục nội dung

Theo thống kê từ các đề thi thực tế, chủ đề news/media xuất hiện với tần suất cao trong các kỳ thi từ 2020 đến 2024, đặc biệt sau đại dịch COVID-19 khi thông tin trở nên quan trọng hơn bao giờ hết. Khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai được dự đoán ở mức cao do tính thời sự và liên quan đến đời sống hàng ngày.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được:

Các câu hỏi thường gặp về chủ đề news trong cả 3 Part
Bài mẫu chi tiết theo nhiều band điểm từ 6-7, 7.5-8 đến 8.5-9
Từ vựng chuyên ngành về media, journalism và current affairs
Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn examiner
Cách phân tích và mở rộng câu trả lời để đạt điểm cao
Những lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút với các câu hỏi ngắn về đời sống hàng ngày. Với chủ đề news, giám khảo thường hỏi về thói quen đọc tin, nguồn thông tin yêu thích và thái độ của bạn đối với các loại tin tức khác nhau.

Đặc điểm quan trọng:

Câu hỏi ngắn gọn, tập trung vào personal experience
Thời gian trả lời: 2-3 câu cho mỗi câu hỏi
Không cần quá chi tiết hay academic
Nên trả lời tự nhiên như trò chuyện bình thường

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

Trả lời quá ngắn chỉ Yes/No mà không giải thích
Dùng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “interesting” lặp đi lặp lại
Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ cuộc sống bản thân
Nói quá nhanh hoặc quá chậm, thiếu tự nhiên
Không duy trì eye contact với examiner

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you often read the news?

Question 2: How do you usually get your news?

Question 3: What kind of news are you most interested in?

Question 4: Do you prefer reading news online or in newspapers?

Question 5: Do you think it’s important to keep up with current events?

Question 6: Have you ever shared a news story with your friends?

Question 7: What news sources do you trust the most?

Question 8: Do you watch news on TV?

Question 9: How often do you check the news during the day?

Question 10: Do you discuss news with your family or friends?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you often read the news?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

Trả lời trực tiếp có hay không
Giải thích tần suất cụ thể (daily, weekly, occasionally)
Đưa ra lý do hoặc ví dụ về loại tin tức bạn thường đọc

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I read the news quite regularly, usually in the morning. I check my phone for updates about what’s happening in Vietnam and around the world. I think it’s important to stay informed about current events.

Phân tích:

Điểm mạnh: Trả lời rõ ràng, có thời điểm cụ thể (in the morning), đề cập đến mục đích (stay informed)
Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (quite regularly, important), thiếu chi tiết về nguồn tin hoặc loại tin tức cụ thể
Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời đủ thông tin cơ bản nhưng chưa impressive, vocabulary ở mức adequate, grammar đơn giản nhưng chính xác

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Yes, absolutely. I’m actually quite conscientious about keeping abreast of current affairs. Every morning over breakfast, I scroll through several news apps on my phone, particularly for breaking news about politics and technology. I find that staying well-informed helps me participate more meaningfully in conversations at work and understand the broader context of what’s happening globally.

Phân tích:

Điểm mạnh:
- Vocabulary tinh vi: “conscientious”, “keeping abreast of”, “breaking news”, “broader context”
- Cấu trúc đa dạng: “I find that…” clause, present continuous for habits
- Chi tiết cụ thể: news apps, timing, topics, purpose
- Natural discourse markers: “actually”, “particularly”
Tại sao Band 8-9:
- Fluency cao với câu dài nhưng natural
- Vocabulary chính xác và sophisticated
- Grammar phức tạp không lỗi
- Ideas có depth, giải thích tại sao đọc tin

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

conscientious about: tận tâm, chu đáo trong việc gì đó
keep abreast of: cập nhật thông tin liên tục
scroll through: lướt qua (trên điện thoại/máy tính)
breaking news: tin nóng, tin khẩn
stay well-informed: duy trì việc nắm bắt thông tin tốt
broader context: bối cảnh rộng hơn

Question: How do you usually get your news?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

Nêu nguồn tin chính (social media, apps, TV, newspapers)
Giải thích tại sao chọn nguồn đó
Có thể so sánh với cách khác

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I mainly get news from social media like Facebook and some news websites. It’s very convenient because I can read them anytime on my phone. Sometimes I also watch the evening news on TV with my family.

Phân tích:

Điểm mạnh: Đề cập nhiều nguồn khác nhau (social media, websites, TV), có lý do (convenient)
Hạn chế: Vocabulary cơ bản (mainly, sometimes), chưa specific về tên apps/websites, grammar đơn giản
Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate response với đủ thông tin nhưng thiếu sophistication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, I’m quite eclectic in my news consumption. I primarily rely on reputable news apps like BBC News and VnExpress for verified information, but I also catch wind of trending stories through social media platforms, particularly Twitter. However, I’m cautious about taking social media content at face value – I always cross-reference important news with established media outlets before believing it. Occasionally, I tune into podcast news briefings during my commute, which I find incredibly time-efficient.

Phân tích:

Điểm mạnh:
- Vocabulary nâng cao: “eclectic”, “reputable”, “catch wind of”, “cross-reference”, “established media outlets”
- Cấu trúc phức tạp: “before believing it” (time clause), “which I find…” (relative clause)
- Critical thinking: đề cập đến việc verify information
- Natural expressions: “Well”, “However”, “Occasionally”
- Specific examples: BBC News, VnExpress, Twitter, podcasts
Tại sao Band 8-9:
- Fluency tự nhiên với discourse markers
- Vocabulary precise và topic-specific
- Grammar range rộng và accurate
- Shows awareness về media literacy

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

eclectic in news consumption: đa dạng trong cách tiêu thụ tin tức
reputable news apps: ứng dụng tin tức uy tín
verified information: thông tin đã được xác minh
catch wind of: nghe ngóng, biết được (thông tin)
cautious about: thận trọng về
cross-reference: đối chiếu thông tin từ nhiều nguồn
established media outlets: các cơ quan truyền thông lâu đời, uy tín
time-efficient: hiệu quả về mặt thời gian

Question: What kind of news are you most interested in?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

Chỉ rõ loại tin tức cụ thể (politics, sports, entertainment, technology, etc.)
Giải thích tại sao quan tâm đến loại tin đó
Có thể đề cập đến loại tin không thích để tạo contrast

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I’m most interested in technology news because I work in IT. I like reading about new gadgets and software updates. I also follow sports news, especially football, because I’m a big fan of Manchester United.

Phân tích:

Điểm mạnh: Có reason rõ ràng (work in IT, fan of football), đề cập 2 loại tin
Hạn chế: Simple vocabulary (interested in, like, big fan), thiếu depth trong explanation
Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear communication nhưng lacks sophistication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

I’m particularly drawn to science and technology news, partly because I work in the tech sector, but more fundamentally because I’m fascinated by how innovations shape our daily lives. I regularly follow developments in artificial intelligence and renewable energy – topics that I believe will define the trajectory of the 21st century. That said, I also keep tabs on political news, though I find it can be quite polarizing at times. I tend to steer clear of celebrity gossip and entertainment news, as I don’t find much substance there.

Phân tích:

Điểm mạnh:
- Advanced expressions: “drawn to”, “fascinated by”, “shape our daily lives”, “define the trajectory of”, “keep tabs on”, “steer clear of”
- Complex reasons: cả personal và philosophical
- Balanced view: nói cả thích và không thích
- Specific examples: AI, renewable energy
- Sophisticated vocabulary: “polarizing”, “substance”
Tại sao Band 8-9:
- Fluent với varied sentence structures
- Precise và sophisticated vocabulary
- Shows critical thinking và personal perspective
- Natural hesitation devices: “That said”, “though”

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

drawn to: bị thu hút bởi
fascinated by: say mê, cuốn hút bởi
shape our daily lives: định hình cuộc sống hàng ngày
developments in: những phát triển trong lĩnh vực
define the trajectory of: định hình quỹ đạo phát triển của
keep tabs on: theo dõi sát sao
polarizing: gây chia rẽ, phân cực
steer clear of: tránh xa
substance: bản chất, nội dung có giá trị

Học viên IELTS Speaking đang chuẩn bị cho đề thi về tin tức quan trọng với tài liệu và thiết bị công nghệ

Nếu bạn quan tâm đến việc phát triển kỹ năng mô tả các trải nghiệm tích cực, hãy tham khảo thêm bài viết describe a time when you felt truly happy để học cách kể chuyện một cách sinh động và tự nhiên hơn trong IELTS Speaking.

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần độc thoại quan trọng nhất trong IELTS Speaking, kéo dài 3-4 phút bao gồm 1 phút chuẩn bị và 2-3 phút trình bày. Đây là cơ hội để bạn thể hiện khả năng nói liên tục, mạch lạc về một chủ đề cụ thể.

Thời gian chuẩn bị: 1 phút

Đừng lãng phí thời gian này
Ghi chú keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh
Note down ideas cho tất cả bullet points
Suy nghĩ về vocabulary nâng cao có thể dùng

Thời gian nói: 2-3 phút

Tối thiểu 1.5 phút để tránh bị mất điểm
Tối đa 3 phút, examiner sẽ ngắt lời nếu quá
Nói đủ các bullet points
Maintain fluency, đừng dừng lại quá lâu

Chiến lược quan trọng:

Sử dụng thì quá khứ nếu đề bài yêu cầu (a piece of news you heard)
Mở rộng ý bằng cách thêm feelings, opinions, consequences
Dùng discourse markers để connect ideas
Story-telling approach thay vì listing facts

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

Không sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị, bắt đầu nói ngay
Nói dưới 1.5 phút vì thiếu ideas
Bỏ sót bullet points, đặc biệt là câu “explain why”
Đọc notes thay vì nói tự nhiên
Dùng vocabulary quá phức tạp không tự nhiên
Thiếu structure rõ ràng

Cue Card

Describe an important piece of news you heard

You should say:

What the news was about

When and where you heard it

How you felt about this news

And explain why you think it was important

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an event/experience – kể về một tin tức cụ thể bạn đã nghe

Thì động từ: Quá khứ chủ yếu (was, heard, felt) vì đây là tin tức đã nghe trong quá khứ

Bullet points phải cover:

What the news was about: Nội dung tin tức gì? Sự kiện nào? Liên quan đến ai/cái gì?
When and where you heard it: Thời gian cụ thể (có thể approximate), nguồn tin (TV, social media, from someone)
How you felt: Cảm xúc cá nhân – surprised, shocked, excited, worried, relieved, inspired
Why it was important: Đây là phần quan trọng nhất – explain impact (on society, on you personally, on future)

Câu “explain why it was important” quan trọng: Đây là phần ghi điểm cao nhất vì đòi hỏi critical thinking và ability to analyze. Đừng chỉ nói “it was important because many people care about it” – hãy explain deeper implications, consequences, significance.

Tips chọn tin tức:

Chọn tin tức có impact rõ ràng (medical breakthrough, policy change, natural disaster, achievement)
Không nhất thiết phải là tin quốc tế lớn – tin local cũng được nếu explain well
Tránh tin tức quá controversial về politics hoặc religion
Chọn tin mà bạn có đủ vocabulary để describe

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

I’d like to talk about an important piece of news I heard about a year ago. It was about Vietnam’s successful handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

I heard this news on the television while watching the evening news with my family. It was during the early stages of the pandemic when many countries were struggling to control the spread of the virus.

The news reported that Vietnam had implemented strict measures like contact tracing, quarantine, and testing, which helped to keep the number of cases very low. The reporter also mentioned that international media praised Vietnam’s approach.

I felt really proud when I heard this news. As a Vietnamese person, it made me happy to see my country doing well and receiving recognition from other countries. Many of my friends also shared this news on social media and everyone was talking about it.

I think this news was important for several reasons. First, it showed that Vietnam could handle a major crisis effectively. Second, it gave people confidence in the government’s ability to protect citizens. The news also made Vietnamese people feel proud of their country. Finally, it was important because it affected everyone’s daily life – people felt safer knowing that the situation was under control.

Overall, this was a piece of news that had a positive impact on the whole nation and made me feel proud to be Vietnamese.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Maintains flow với minimal hesitation, có sequencing rõ ràng (First, Second, Finally) nhưng discourse markers còn basic. Cohesive devices adequate nhưng chưa sophisticated.
Lexical Resource	6-7	Vocabulary đủ để convey meaning: “successful handling”, “implemented strict measures”, “receiving recognition”. Có attempts dùng less common words nhưng còn some inaccuracy. Range adequate nhưng chưa flexible.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Mix của simple và complex sentences. Past tense chính xác nhưng chủ yếu là structures cơ bản. Có relative clauses “which helped” và “that affected” nhưng limited variety.
Pronunciation	6-7	Generally clear và understandable. Có thể có một số mispronunciation nhưng không ảnh hưởng comprehension. Sentence stress và rhythm acceptable.

Điểm mạnh:

✅ Cover đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
✅ Structure rõ ràng với opening, body, conclusion
✅ Có personal feelings và reactions
✅ Explain được why it was important với multiple reasons
✅ Thì quá khứ consistent và accurate

Hạn chế:

⚠️ Vocabulary còn simple ở một số chỗ (“doing well”, “major crisis”)
⚠️ Thiếu specific details về numbers, dates, names
⚠️ Grammar structures không varied lắm
⚠️ Thiếu idiomatic expressions hoặc collocations nâng cao
⚠️ Phần explain importance có thể deeper và more analytical

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

I’d like to share with you a piece of news that really struck a chord with me – it was about Vietnam’s admission into the United Nations back in… actually, wait, let me talk about something more recent. It was the announcement of the first Vietnamese COVID-19 vaccine, Nanocovax, entering clinical trials around mid-2021.

I came across this news while scrolling through my social media feed one morning. Several major Vietnamese news outlets had broken the story, and it was trending on Facebook and various news apps simultaneously. The timing was particularly significant because it was during a period when Vietnam was grappling with a serious outbreak.

The news detailed how Vietnamese scientists had successfully developed a locally-produced vaccine that showed promising results in initial testing phases. What really caught my attention was that Vietnam was among the few developing nations capable of producing its own vaccine, which was quite a remarkable achievement.

My initial reaction was a mixture of pride and relief. Pride because it showcased Vietnam’s scientific capabilities and determination to be self-reliant rather than solely depending on vaccine imports. Relief because it offered hope during an incredibly challenging time when vaccines were in short supply globally. I remember calling up several friends to discuss this, and everyone shared similar sentiments of cautious optimism.

I believe this news was important on multiple levels. On a practical level, it represented a potential solution to our pressing health crisis and offered a pathway toward herd immunity. On a symbolic level, it demonstrated that Vietnamese scientists could compete on the global stage in cutting-edge biotechnology. Moreover, it sparked conversations about investing more in scientific research and development – something that had been overlooked for years. The announcement also galvanized public support for the scientific community and showed that innovation could emerge from unexpected places, not just from well-established pharmaceutical giants.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Speaks fluently với minimal repetition hoặc self-correction (có một self-correction natural “actually, wait”). Discourse markers sophisticated: “What really caught my attention”, “On a practical level”, “Moreover”. Cohesion strong với varied connectives.
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide vocabulary range: “struck a chord”, “grappling with”, “showcased”, “self-reliant”, “galvanized”. Collocations natural: “entering clinical trials”, “broken the story”, “cautious optimism”. Rare inaccuracies. Paraphrasing effective.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Wide range of structures: relative clauses, participle clauses (“showing promising results”), complex sentences. Mix of tenses appropriate. Errors rare và don’t impede communication.
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear pronunciation với consistent control. Effective use of intonation và sentence stress. Features of connected speech present. Easy to understand throughout.

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“successful handling”, “major crisis”	“struck a chord”, “grappling with”, “galvanized public support”
Grammar	“Vietnam had implemented strict measures which helped…”	“What really caught my attention was that Vietnam was among the few developing nations capable of…”
Ideas	“It showed Vietnam could handle crisis and gave people confidence”	“On symbolic level, it demonstrated Vietnamese scientists could compete on global stage… sparked conversations about investing in R&D”
Details	General reference “about a year ago”	Specific time “mid-2021” và specific name “Nanocovax”
Development	Lists reasons (First, Second, Finally)	Analyzes multiple dimensions (practical level, symbolic level) with deeper implications

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

I’d like to recount a piece of news that I found particularly momentous – it was the announcement in late 2022 about Vietnam being upgraded to an emerging market by FTSE Russell, one of the world’s leading index providers. This might sound somewhat technical to non-economists, but its ramifications were actually quite far-reaching.

I stumbled upon this news rather serendipitously while leafing through the business section of an online newspaper during my morning coffee ritual. What initially caught my eye was the somewhat understated headline, but as I delved deeper into the article, I realized the magnitude of what this upgrade actually entailed. The news had been simultaneously released across multiple international financial platforms, which underscored its global significance.

To give you some context, this upgrade meant that Vietnam’s stock market had met stringent criteria regarding market accessibility, regulatory standards, and economic stability. Essentially, it was a vote of confidence from the international investment community, signaling that Vietnam had graduated from frontier market status to a more mature economic standing.

My reaction was one of measured elation. On one hand, I felt a genuine sense of national pride – it was validation that the economic reforms and development strategies pursued over the past few decades were bearing fruit. On the other hand, being someone who closely follows economic developments, I was also acutely aware of the challenges this would bring. The increased foreign investment could potentially lead to market volatility and inflationary pressures if not carefully managed.

The importance of this news cannot be overstated, and I see it through multiple lenses. From an economic standpoint, the upgrade was projected to channel billions of dollars in foreign investment into Vietnamese markets, as many international funds are mandated to invest in emerging markets but cannot invest in frontier ones. This influx of capital would facilitate infrastructure development and corporate expansion.

From a broader developmental perspective, this milestone represented Vietnam’s remarkable trajectory from a war-torn nation to a dynamic economy in just a few decades. It positioned Vietnam alongside countries like India, Brazil, and South Africa in terms of market classification, which is no small feat.

Perhaps most intriguingly, this news catalyzed discussions about Vietnam’s future economic policies. It raised pertinent questions about how to maintain growth while ensuring equitable distribution of prosperity, how to balance attracting foreign capital with protecting domestic industries, and how to navigate the complexities of heightened international scrutiny.

On a personal level, as someone considering long-term investment strategies, this news prompted me to reassess my own financial planning and consider how these macro-level changes might trickle down to individual opportunities and challenges.

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Speaks fluently với only rare hesitation. Natural use of discourse markers: “Essentially”, “On one hand… On the other hand”, “cannot be overstated”, “From a broader perspective”. Develops topics coherently và appropriately. Sophisticated cohesive devices used naturally.
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Wide vocabulary used naturally và precisely: “momentous”, “ramifications”, “serendipitously”, “magnitude”, “entailed”, “underscored”. Sophisticated collocations: “vote of confidence”, “bearing fruit”, “channel billions”, “catalyzed discussions”. Rare minor errors. Uses idiomatic language naturally: “no small feat”, “trickle down to”.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range of structures used naturally: complex conditionals (“if not carefully managed”), cleft sentences (“What initially caught my eye was…”), participle clauses, relative clauses. Consistent grammatical control. Errors extremely rare.
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Pronunciation sophisticated với full control. Intonation và sentence stress used effectively to enhance meaning. Features of connected speech throughout. Accent có minimal effect on intelligibility.

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Người nói demonstrates complete confidence với minimal hesitation. Sử dụng fillers một cách tự nhiên (“This might sound somewhat technical”) để maintain conversational tone chứ không phải do lack of ideas. Transitions between ideas smooth và logical.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

Ví dụ: “stumbled upon this news rather serendipitously” – thay vì nói đơn giản “I found this news accidentally”, candidate dùng “serendipitously” (tình cờ gặp may) cho thấy vocabulary range rộng
Ví dụ: “the ramifications were far-reaching” – “ramifications” (hậu quả sâu rộng) là academic word precise hơn “effects” hay “impacts”
Ví dụ: “measured elation” – collocation tinh tế thể hiện mixed emotions, sophisticated hơn “happy but worried”
Ví dụ: “catalyzed discussions” – metaphor từ chemistry, shows creativity trong language use

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

Ví dụ: “What initially caught my eye was the somewhat understated headline” – cleft sentence structure để emphasize
Ví dụ: “being someone who closely follows economic developments, I was also acutely aware of the challenges” – participle clause showing simultaneous actions/states
Ví dụ: “The increased foreign investment could potentially lead to market volatility if not carefully managed” – conditional với ellipsis (if [it is] not carefully managed)
Ví dụ: “It positioned Vietnam alongside countries like India” – verb “position” used metaphorically, không phải literal meaning

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Thay vì chỉ nói “this news was important because it’s good for economy”, candidate phân tích multi-dimensional:

Economic dimension: capital flows, investment opportunities
Developmental dimension: historical trajectory, national achievement
Policy dimension: future challenges, balancing acts
Personal dimension: individual implications

Candidate cũng shows critical thinking bằng cách acknowledge both positive và challenges (“On the other hand, I was acutely aware of the challenges”), demonstrating mature perspective rather than one-sided view.

Bonus elements:

Specific names/details: “FTSE Russell”, “late 2022”, “billions of dollars”
Technical terminology used appropriately: “emerging market”, “frontier market”, “index providers”
Personal context: “during my morning coffee ritual”, “as someone considering long-term investment”
Sophisticated signposting: “To give you some context”, “From an economic standpoint”, “Perhaps most intriguingly”

Thí sinh IELTS Speaking Part 2 đang tự tin trình bày về tin tức quan trọng trước giám khảo

Để phát triển thêm khả năng phân tích và trình bày các chủ đề phức tạp, bạn có thể tham khảo cách tiếp cận trong bài describe a skill you want to master, nơi bạn sẽ học cách structure một bài nói dài với nhiều layers của ý tưởng.

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Sau khi bạn hoàn thành phần độc thoại 2 phút, examiner thường hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn để transition sang Part 3. Những câu này thường liên quan trực tiếp đến story bạn vừa kể.

Question 1: Did you share this news with anyone?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Yes, I did. I shared it with my family and some friends. We talked about it for a while and everyone had different opinions about it.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Absolutely. I actually engaged in quite extensive discussions with colleagues at work, particularly those with backgrounds in economics and finance. We dissected the potential implications for various sectors and even debated whether this would accelerate or complicate Vietnam’s integration into the global economy. I also shared some articles on my social media, which sparked some interesting commentary from my network.

Question 2: How did other people react to this news?

Band 6-7 Answer:
Most people I talked to were happy about it. Some people were excited because they thought it would bring more jobs and opportunities. A few people were worried about possible negative effects.

Band 8-9 Answer:
Reactions were decidedly mixed, which I found quite fascinating. The business community was largely bullish about the prospects, with many entrepreneurs seeing it as a green light for expansion and foreign partnerships. However, there was a more cautious sentiment among economists and policy analysts who voiced concerns about Vietnam’s preparedness for the increased capital flows and regulatory demands. Ordinary citizens, from what I gathered through social media discourse, seemed cautiously optimistic but somewhat detached from the technical intricacies of what the upgrade actually meant for their daily lives.

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần thảo luận sâu và trừu tượng nhất, kéo dài 4-5 phút. Đây là nơi examiner đánh giá khả năng phân tích, lập luận và thảo luận các vấn đề xã hội rộng hơn liên quan đến chủ đề Part 2.

Đặc điểm quan trọng:

Câu hỏi mang tính why/how, không phải yes/no đơn giản
Yêu cầu opinions có lý lẽ, không chỉ personal experience
Cần so sánh, đánh giá, analyze causes and effects
Vocabulary trừu tượng, academic hơn Part 1 và 2

Yêu cầu cụ thể:

Phân tích: Giải thích causes, effects, reasons phía sau phenomena
So sánh: Past vs present, different groups, different countries
Đánh giá: Pros and cons, effectiveness of solutions
Dự đoán: Future trends, possible developments
Quan điểm: Personal opinion nhưng có supporting arguments

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

Mở rộng câu trả lời 3-5 câu minimum
Structure: Direct answer → Reason 1 + example → Reason 2 + example → Conclusion/nuance
Sử dụng discourse markers: Well, Actually, From my perspective, On the one hand
Acknowledge complexity: “It’s not straightforward”, “It depends on”, “There are multiple factors”
Bring in examples từ society, research, không chỉ cá nhân
Show balanced view khi appropriate

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

Trả lời quá ngắn 1-2 câu without elaboration
Chỉ nói personal experience thay vì general analysis
Thiếu reasoning và examples to support points
Vocabulary quá simple, không đủ abstract terms
Grammar structures lặp lại, thiếu variety
Không dám express strong opinions hoặc disagree với assumptions trong câu hỏi
Mất điểm vì say “I don’t know” thay vì attempt to answer

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Media Influence and Credibility

Question 1: How has the way people get news changed in recent years?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

Dạng: Compare past vs present (how people consumed news before vs now)
Key words: “changed”, “recent years” – cần so sánh và identify major shifts
Cách tiếp cận:
1. Acknowledge the change
2. Describe past situation briefly
3. Describe current situation với examples
4. Explain reasons for change
5. Mention implications nếu có

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

The way people get news has changed a lot in recent years. In the past, most people got their news from traditional sources like newspapers, TV, and radio. But now, more and more people use the internet and social media to get news. This is because smartphones are very popular and people can check news anytime they want. Online news is also faster than newspapers. However, this change also brings some problems because not all online news is reliable.

Phân tích:

Structure: Có comparison past vs present, đề cập reason và problem
Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng basic (“a lot”, “more and more”, “very popular”)
Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicates ideas clearly nhưng lacks sophistication. Vocabulary và grammar ở mức sufficient nhưng không impressive.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Well, the transformation has been quite dramatic, I’d say. Traditionally, people relied heavily on what we might call legacy media – newspapers, television broadcasts, and radio. News consumption was quite regimented, with people tuning in at specific times or purchasing papers on their morning commute.

Fast forward to today, and we’re seeing a seismic shift toward digital platforms. The proliferation of smartphones has essentially put a 24/7 newsroom in everyone’s pocket. People now encounter news through multiple channels simultaneously – social media feeds, push notifications, podcast subscriptions, and aggregator apps. This has created what experts call an “always-on” news cycle.

Several factors have driven this transition. Primarily, it’s about convenience and speed – breaking news can reach millions instantaneously through Twitter or Facebook, whereas traditional media operates with inherent delays. Additionally, younger generations have gravitated toward platforms where they can customize their news intake and engage in real-time discussions.

However, this democratization of news distribution has been a double-edged sword. While it’s empowered citizen journalism and diversified perspectives, it’s also facilitated the spread of misinformation and created echo chambers where people only consume news that reinforces their existing beliefs. The erosion of gatekeeping that traditional media provided means readers now need to be far more discerning about source credibility.

Phân tích:

Structure: Well-organized với past description → present description → reasons → implications
Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise: “seismic shift”, “proliferation”, “aggregator apps”, “democratization”, “echo chambers”, “erosion of gatekeeping”
Grammar: Complex structures: passive voice (“has been driven”), relative clauses (“where they can customize”), present perfect (“has empowered”)
Critical Thinking: Shows balanced view với both benefits và drawbacks, uses expert terminology (“echo chambers”, “citizen journalism”)

💡 Key Language Features:

Discourse markers: “Well”, “Traditionally”, “Fast forward to today”, “Primarily”, “Additionally”, “However”
Tentative language: “I’d say”, “what we might call”, “what experts call”
Abstract nouns: “transformation”, “proliferation”, “democratization”, “erosion”
Academic collocations: “legacy media”, “seismic shift”, “echo chambers”, “gatekeeping”

Question 2: Do you think social media is a reliable source of news? Why or why not?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

Dạng: Opinion + Reason (có thể argue both sides)
Key words: “reliable”, “social media” – cần define reliability và analyze social media đặc điểm
Cách tiếp cận:
1. Give nuanced answer (không simply yes/no)
2. Define what “reliable” means in news context
3. Present pros của social media as news source
4. Present cons và risks
5. Conclude với balanced perspective

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think social media is not very reliable for news. There are several reasons. First, anyone can post anything on social media without checking if it’s true. This means there’s a lot of fake news. Second, social media companies want to make money, so they show news that gets more clicks, not necessarily important news. However, social media can be useful if we follow official news organizations. So I think we need to be careful and check information from different sources.

Phân tích:

Structure: Clear opinion → reasons → concession → conclusion
Vocabulary: Adequate (“fake news”, “clicks”, “official”) nhưng limited range
Tại sao Band 6-7: Presents relevant ideas với basic reasoning, nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated language

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

This is quite a contentious issue, and I’d argue the answer is decidedly nuanced. Social media as a news source is something of a paradox – it has the potential to be both highly reliable and deeply unreliable, often simultaneously.

On the reliability front, social media platforms can actually be remarkably effective for real-time reporting, particularly during breaking events. During natural disasters or major incidents, eyewitness accounts and on-the-ground footage often surface on platforms like Twitter well before traditional media can mobilize their coverage. This unfiltered immediacy can be invaluable. Moreover, many reputable news organizations maintain robust social media presence, so following verified accounts can provide credible updates.

However, the flip side is rather concerning. Social media’s fundamental design undermines traditional journalistic safeguards. There’s no editorial oversight, no fact-checking infrastructure, and no requirement for balanced reporting. The algorithmic curation of content creates filter bubbles where misleading information can proliferate unchecked. We’ve seen how misinformation campaigns can exploit these platforms, from fabricated health advice to politically motivated disinformation.

What particularly troubles me is the erosion of source verification. Many users share headlines without reading full articles, and the viral nature of social media rewards sensationalism over accuracy. The phenomenon of deepfakes and manipulated content further muddles the waters.

My take is that social media shouldn’t be dismissed entirely as a news source, but it requires what I’d call “critical media literacy.” Users need to cross-reference information, verify sources, understand their own confirmation biases, and recognize the difference between an opinion piece and investigative journalism. Essentially, social media can be a valuable supplement to traditional news, but relying on it exclusively would be intellectually precarious.

Phân tích:

Structure: Nuanced intro → Positive aspects + examples → Negative aspects + examples → Personal concerns → Balanced conclusion with solution
Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: “contentious”, “paradox”, “mobilize”, “proliferate unchecked”, “muddles the waters”, “intellectually precarious”
Grammar: Full range: conditionals, participle clauses, passive constructions, metaphorical language
Critical Thinking:
- Acknowledges complexity (“decidedly nuanced”, “paradox”)
- Uses specific examples (natural disasters, deepfakes, misinformation campaigns)
- Shows awareness of underlying mechanisms (algorithmic curation, filter bubbles)
- Proposes solution (critical media literacy)
- Personal engagement (“What particularly troubles me”)

💡 Key Language Features:

Tentative/hedging language: “I’d argue”, “something of a”, “can be”, “My take is”
Emphasis structures: “What particularly troubles me is…”, “Essentially”
Contrast markers: “However, the flip side”, “On the reliability front”
Academic vocabulary: “editorial oversight”, “algorithmic curation”, “confirmation biases”, “intellectually precarious”

Question 3: Why do you think fake news spreads so quickly online?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

Dạng: Cause analysis (explain reasons/mechanisms)
Key words: “why”, “spreads quickly” – cần explain multiple factors
Cách tiếp cận:
1. Acknowledge the problem
2. Explain psychological factors (why people share)
3. Explain technological factors (how platforms enable)
4. Explain social factors (group dynamics)
5. Possibly mention consequences

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Fake news spreads quickly for several reasons. First, people often don’t check if news is true before sharing it. They see something interesting and just share it immediately. Second, social media algorithms show content that gets a lot of engagement, so fake news that is shocking or emotional spreads faster. Third, people tend to believe and share news that matches their opinions. Finally, it’s very easy to share content online with just one click.

Phân tích:

Structure: Clear với multiple reasons listed
Vocabulary: Basic terms (“interesting”, “shocking”, “emotional”)
Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main points adequately but lacks sophisticated analysis và vocabulary

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

This is a fascinating question that actually touches on several intersecting factors – psychological, technological, and social.

From a psychological standpoint, fake news often exploits what researchers call “cognitive biases.” People have a natural tendency toward confirmation bias – we’re more likely to accept and share information that aligns with our pre-existing beliefs, regardless of its veracity. Fake news creators capitalize on this by crafting stories that resonate emotionally with specific audiences. Moreover, there’s the “illusory truth effect” – repeated exposure to a claim makes it feel more truthful, even if it’s false.

Technologically, social media platforms inadvertently facilitate rapid dissemination through their algorithmic design. These algorithms prioritize engagement over accuracy, meaning sensational or controversial content – which fake news often is – gets amplified exponentially. The frictionless nature of sharing – literally just a click – means misinformation can achieve viral spread before fact-checkers can intervene. Unlike traditional media, which had gatekeeping mechanisms, online platforms have essentially democratized publishing, but without equivalent quality controls.

Socially, there’s a tribal element at play. People share content not just to inform, but to signal group membership and strengthen social bonds. Sharing news that vilifies opposing viewpoints or validates one’s community serves social functions beyond mere information exchange. This creates what some call “information cascades,” where people share content because others in their network are sharing it, creating a self-reinforcing cycle.

What’s particularly insidious is how these factors compound one another. A piece of fake news that triggers emotional responses will be algorithmically promoted, shared within echo chambers, and reinforced through repetition, all while people’s cognitive biases make them resistant to corrections. Studies have shown that debunking fake news is considerably harder than its initial spread – the adage about lies traveling faster than truth has never been more empirically validated.

Addressing this requires multi-pronged approaches: improved digital literacy education, platform responsibility for content moderation, and perhaps most importantly, fostering critical thinking skills that encourage people to pause and verify before sharing.

Phân tích:

Structure: Excellent organization với 3 dimensions (psychological, technological, social) → compounding effects → solutions
Vocabulary: Highly academic và precise: “cognitive biases”, “illusory truth effect”, “frictionless nature”, “gatekeeping mechanisms”, “information cascades”, “empirically validated”
Grammar: Complex với varied structures: participle clauses, relative clauses, passive voice, conditional-like structures
Critical Thinking:
- Multi-dimensional analysis (3 lenses)
- Uses research terminology (“researchers call”, “Studies have shown”)
- Explains mechanisms, not just states facts
- Shows how factors interact (“compound one another”)
- Proposes solutions
- Personal evaluation (“What’s particularly insidious”)

Theme 2: Impact of News on Society

Question 4: How does news media influence public opinion?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

Dạng: Process explanation + Analysis
Key words: “influence”, “public opinion” – cần explain mechanisms của media influence
Cách tiếp cận:
1. Acknowledge significant influence
2. Explain direct mechanisms (agenda-setting, framing)
3. Explain indirect mechanisms (normalization, priming)
4. Give examples
5. Mention limitations hoặc counter-factors

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

News media has a big influence on public opinion. First, media decides which stories to cover, so people only know about things that media reports. If media talks a lot about a problem, people think it’s important. Second, the way media presents news affects how people understand it. For example, if news always shows certain groups negatively, people might have negative opinions about them. Also, media can influence elections by how they cover different candidates. However, not everyone is influenced equally – educated people might be more critical of media.

Phân tích:

Structure: Clear với mechanism explanation và example
Vocabulary: Basic terms (“big influence”, “talks a lot”, “shows negatively”)
Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers key points nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated terminology

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

News media’s influence on public opinion is both profound and multifaceted, operating through several well-documented mechanisms that communication scholars have been studying for decades.

Firstly, there’s what’s called the “agenda-setting function.” Media may not tell us what to think, but they’re remarkably effective at telling us what to think about. By choosing which issues to spotlight and which to ignore, media essentially curates public consciousness. When outlets devote extensive coverage to a particular issue – say, immigration or climate change – it elevates that topic’s perceived importance in the public’s mind, regardless of its objective urgency.

Secondly, framing plays a crucial role. It’s not just about which stories get told, but how they’re told. The same event can be portrayed through vastly different lenses – is a protest a “demonstration of democratic rights” or “public disturbance”? These subtle linguistic choices and the contextual elements that get emphasized or omitted shape interpretations fundamentally. Research has shown that such framing effects can sway even well-informed audiences.

Beyond these, there’s the “cultivation effect” – the gradual shaping of worldviews through repeated exposure to media narratives. If news consistently depicts certain demographics or situations in particular ways, audiences’ perceptions of reality begin to align with those portrayals, even when they contradict personal experience or statistical reality. This is particularly evident in how crime coverage can inflate fear despite actual crime rates declining.

Media also functions as a legitimizing force. When outlets grant airtime to certain voices or perspectives, they confer credibility and mainstream acceptance. This gatekeeping power determines which discourses enter public debate and which remain marginalized.

That said, I should nuance this by noting that media influence isn’t monolithic or unidirectional. Audiences aren’t passive receptacles; they bring their own cognitive frameworks, prior beliefs, and critical faculties to media consumption. The fragmentation of media environments has also meant that different groups consume entirely different news ecosystems, sometimes impervious to contradictory information.

Moreover, the rise of participatory media has somewhat diluted traditional outlets’ monopoly on opinion formation. Grassroots movements can now shape discourse from the bottom up through social media mobilization, occasionally even forcing mainstream media to cover issues they’d otherwise ignore.

In essence, while news media remains a powerful architect of public opinion, its influence is mediated by numerous factors – individual differences, socio-political context, media literacy levels, and the increasingly polyphonic nature of contemporary information environments.

Phân tích:

Structure: Exceptional với systematic explanation of 4 mechanisms → nuanced qualifications → counter-factors → sophisticated conclusion
Vocabulary: Highly academic: “multifaceted”, “curates public consciousness”, “sway”, “cultivation effect”, “legitimizing force”, “confer credibility”, “monolithic”, “passive receptacles”, “polyphonic nature”
Grammar: Full sophisticated range với varied complex structures throughout
Critical Thinking:
- Uses academic frameworks (“agenda-setting”, “framing effects”, “cultivation effect”, “gatekeeping”)
- Provides concrete examples (protest framing, crime coverage)
- Acknowledges complexity và limitations
- Shows both traditional và modern dynamics
- Balanced perspective với “that said” qualification
- Meta-awareness (“I should nuance this”)

Giám khảo IELTS đang đánh giá thí sinh trong phần Speaking Part 3 về chủ đề tin tức truyền thông

Question 5: Do you think people are overwhelmed by too much news these days?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

Dạng: Opinion về modern phenomenon
Key words: “overwhelmed”, “too much” – cần discuss information overload
Cách tiếp cận:
1. Acknowledge the phenomenon
2. Explain causes (technology, 24/7 cycle)
3. Describe effects on individuals
4. Consider counterarguments
5. Suggest implications or solutions

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

Yes, I think many people feel overwhelmed by news today. There’s news everywhere – on our phones, computers, and TV. We get notifications all the time about breaking news. This can be stressful because there’s so much bad news like disasters and conflicts. Some people deal with this by avoiding news completely, which is also not good. I think the problem is that we don’t know how to manage the amount of information we receive. We need to be more selective about what news we read.

Phân tích:

Structure: Clear opinion → reasons → effects → solution
Vocabulary: Basic (“everywhere”, “all the time”, “bad news”)
Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses the question adequately với relevant points nhưng lacks sophistication

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Absolutely, and this phenomenon has actually been coined as “news fatigue” or “information overload” by media researchers, and it’s becoming increasingly prevalent.

The root cause is what I’d describe as the “always-on” news ecosystem. We’re living in an era of perpetual connectivity where news is no longer confined to scheduled broadcasts or morning papers. Instead, it’s a continuous stream of updates, push notifications, and algorithmically-curated feeds that follow us throughout our day. The sheer volume is unprecedented – one day’s New York Times contains more information than the average person in the 18th century would encounter in their lifetime, and we’re expected to process exponentially more than that daily.

What’s particularly taxing is the nature of news itself. The media industry has long operated on the principle of “if it bleeds, it leads” – negative news garners more attention and engagement. This means our cognitive bandwidth is constantly being bombarded with crises, conflicts, and catastrophes. From a neurological perspective, this persistent exposure to threat-based information triggers stress responses, and humans aren’t biologically wired for this constant state of heightened alertness.

The consequences are becoming increasingly apparent. Many people are experiencing what psychologists call “headline stress disorder” or “doomscrolling” behavior – compulsively consuming negative news despite its detrimental impact on mental health. Paradoxically, this can lead to both hyper-engagement and complete disengagement – some people become obsessively plugged in, while others practice “news avoidance” as a coping mechanism.

However, I’d contend that the issue isn’t simply about volume, but rather about our curation skills and media literacy. In an age of information abundance, the scarce resource isn’t information but attention and the discernment to filter what truly matters. Some people have successfully adapted by being intentional about their news consumption – setting specific times for updates, curating their sources carefully, and balancing serious news with constructive journalism that focuses on solutions rather than just problems.

Looking forward, I think we’ll see greater emphasis on “slow news” movements – similar to slow food – that advocate for more in-depth, contextualized reporting rather than reactive soundbites. There’s also growing interest in mindful media consumption practices that help people maintain informed awareness without compromising their wellbeing.

Ultimately, while the deluge of news is real and overwhelming for many, the answer lies not in disconnecting entirely but in developing healthier relationships with news media – treating it as a tool for understanding our world rather than a source of perpetual anxiety.

Phân tích:

Structure: Masterful với phenomenon acknowledgment → root causes → psychological effects → consequences → counterpoints → future trends → balanced conclusion
Vocabulary: Exceptionally sophisticated: “coined”, “perpetual connectivity”, “garners”, “cognitive bandwidth”, “bombarded”, “biologically wired”, “doomscrolling”, “detrimental impact”, “curation skills”, “deluge”
Grammar: Full range với complex embedding, conditionals, metaphors used naturally
Critical Thinking:
- Uses academic terminology (“news fatigue”, “doomscrolling”, “headline stress disorder”)
- Historical perspective (18th century comparison)
- Neuroscience angle (“biologically wired”, “stress responses”)
- Acknowledges paradoxes (both hyper-engagement and disengagement)
- Proposes solutions (slow news, mindful consumption)
- Forward-looking (future trends)
- Balanced conclusion (neither completely disconnecting nor passive consumption)

Theme 3: The Future of Journalism

Question 6: How do you think journalism will change in the future?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

Dạng: Prediction + Analysis of trends
Key words: “future”, “change” – cần discuss trends và possibilities
Cách tiếp cận:
1. Acknowledge ongoing changes
2. Predict technological changes (AI, VR, etc.)
3. Predict business model changes
4. Predict content/format changes
5. Consider challenges và opportunities
6. Possibly express uncertainty (natural cho future questions)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think journalism will continue to change because of technology. More news will be online and fewer people will buy newspapers. Maybe journalists will use more videos and interactive content to attract readers. Artificial intelligence might help journalists write articles faster. However, journalists will still need to be careful about checking facts because fake news is a problem. I also think news companies will need to find new ways to make money because many people don’t want to pay for online news.

Phân tích:

Structure: Mentions several aspects (technology, format, AI, business)
Vocabulary: Basic predictive language (“will”, “maybe”, “might”)
Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers relevant points nhưng lacks depth và sophisticated speculation

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

This is quite speculative, of course, but based on current trends, I can envision several significant trajectories for journalism’s evolution.

Technologically, I believe we’ll see increasingly sophisticated integration of AI and machine learning into newsrooms. We’re already seeing rudimentary applications – algorithms writing basic financial reports or sports updates – but this will likely become far more nuanced. AI could handle routine reporting, freeing up human journalists to focus on investigative work, in-depth analysis, and stories requiring emotional intelligence and ethical judgment that machines can’t replicate. However, this raises pertinent questions about labor displacement and whether AI-generated content can truly capture the nuances of human storytelling.

I also anticipate we’ll see more immersive journalism using VR and AR technologies. Imagine experiencing a news story from a war zone or climate disaster site through virtual reality – this could forge much more visceral connections between audiences and distant events. Documentary journalism might increasingly blend with gaming-style interactive experiences.

From a business model perspective, the subscription model will likely cement itself as the dominant paradigm, but we might see more innovative approaches – perhaps micro-payments for individual articles, blockchain-based systems for content verification and payment, or community-supported local journalism akin to crowdfunding. The traditional advertising-supported model seems increasingly untenable given ad-blocking and the duopoly of Google and Facebook capturing most digital advertising revenue.

Content-wise, I think we’ll see a bifurcation. On one end, there’ll be hyper-local, community-focused journalism filling gaps left by the collapse of local newspapers – possibly volunteer or nonprofit models. On the other end, we’ll have global, explanatory journalism that provides deep context for interconnected world events. The middle ground – general interest newspapers covering everything moderately well – might struggle.

Crucially, I think successful journalism will need to rebuild trust through radical transparency – showing sources, methodology, even corrections and evolving understanding of stories. Some outlets are already experimenting with “open-source journalism” where readers can access raw data and trace how conclusions were reached.

What concerns me, though, is whether quality journalism can remain economically viable. Producing serious investigative reporting is resource-intensive, and if audiences aren’t willing to pay adequately for it, we might see a further erosion of accountability journalism – the kind that holds power to account. This has profound implications for democratic societies.

One hopeful trend is the emergence of collaborative journalism – multiple outlets pooling resources for major investigations, and transnational partnerships tackling stories that cross borders, like the Panama Papers investigation.

Ultimately, while I’m cautiously optimistic about the technological possibilities, I think the fundamental challenge remains: ensuring that quality, ethical journalism remains sustainable in an environment where information is ubiquitous but attention and willingness to pay are scarce commodities.

Phân tích:

Structure: Exceptional organization với multiple dimensions systematically explored (technology, business, content, trust, concerns, hope, overall reflection)
Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: “speculative”, “envision trajectories”, “rudimentary applications”, “visceral connections”, “untenable”, “bifurcation”, “hyper-local”, “ubiquitous”, “scarce commodities”
Grammar: Full sophisticated range với varied complex structures, conditionals, hypotheticals
Critical Thinking:
- Balanced speculation (possibilities and concerns)
- Specific examples (AI writing, VR journalism, Panama Papers)
- Economic analysis (business models, sustainability)
- Societal implications (democracy, accountability)
- Multiple perspectives (technology, business, content, ethics)
- Personal concern articulated (“What concerns me”)
- Uncertainty acknowledged appropriately (“This is quite speculative”, “I anticipate”)
- Balanced conclusion (optimistic but realistic)

💡 Key Language Features:

Future speculation: “I can envision”, “I believe we’ll see”, “I anticipate”, “will likely”
Conditional structures: “if audiences aren’t willing to pay”
Contrast markers: “However”, “On one end… On the other end”, “while”
Abstract nouns: “trajectories”, “nuances”, “bifurcation”, “implications”, “sustainability”

Question 7: Should news always be free, or is it reasonable to charge for quality journalism?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

Dạng: Opinion về controversial issue (có thể argue both sides)
Key words: “should”, “free”, “reasonable to charge” – ethical và practical question
Cách tiếp cận:
1. Acknowledge the dilemma
2. Present arguments for free news (accessibility, democracy)
3. Present arguments for paid news (quality, sustainability)
4. Consider nuanced position (hybrid models)
5. Personal judgment with reasoning

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

I think this is a difficult question with no easy answer. On one hand, news should be free because everyone needs information to make good decisions in life. If people have to pay, poor people might not be able to access important news. On the other hand, journalism costs money and journalists need to be paid for their work. If everything is free, news companies might not have enough money to do good journalism. Maybe a compromise is to have some basic news free and charge for special in-depth articles. Or rich people could pay more to support free news for everyone.

Phân tích:

Structure: Balanced với both sides và attempted compromise
Vocabulary: Basic (“difficult question”, “good decisions”, “costs money”)
Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses both perspectives adequately nhưng lacks sophisticated argumentation

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

This is one of journalism’s most vexing dilemmas, and I don’t think there’s a straightforward answer – it depends on how we conceive of journalism’s role in society.

The case for free news rests on what I’d call the “public good argument.” Information, particularly about civic affairs, governance, and matters of public interest, could be viewed as essential infrastructure for democracy – similar to education or public roads. When quality journalism sits behind paywalls, we risk creating an informed elite and an uninformed majority, which has troubling implications for democratic participation. Already, we’re seeing evidence that paywall journalism correlates with echo chambers – people only read sources that align with their pre-existing views because they can’t afford diverse subscriptions.

Moreover, the marginalization of communities who lack resources to pay for news means their concerns may go underreported and unheard. From an equity standpoint, this is deeply problematic. There’s also the argument that since journalism relies heavily on public information, court documents, and government sources – essentially taxpayer-funded infrastructure – charging for its dissemination is somewhat ethically questionable.

However, the counterargument is equally compelling. The free news model, predominantly reliant on advertising, has demonstrably failed. It’s created perverse incentives where journalists optimize for clicks and engagement rather than accuracy and depth. The “attention economy” has degraded journalism into superficial, sensationalist content designed to maximize views. Investigative reporting – the kind that uncovers corruption, holds power accountable, and sometimes takes years to produce – simply cannot be sustained by ad revenue in today’s fragmented media market.

Quality journalism is resource-intensive: it requires skilled journalists, editors, fact-checkers, legal support, and time. If we value this work – and I’d argue democratic societies should value it immensely – then we need sustainable economic models. The reality is that free often means either low quality or funded by interests that may compromise editorial independence.

My view is that we need a mixed ecosystem. At the baseline, there should be publicly funded journalism – akin to BBC or PBS models – that ensures universal access to quality news about essential matters. This could be funded through taxes or license fees and would cover core democratic functions: local governance, courts, health, education, environment.

Beyond this, I see no problem with subscription or membership models for journalism that goes above and beyond – specialized reporting, in-depth investigations, international coverage, cultural content. People pay for Netflix and Spotify; premium journalism is arguably more valuable. However, these outlets should perhaps implement progressive pricing or tiered access – those who can afford more subsidize access for those who can’t.

We might also explore innovative models like cooperative journalism where communities collectively fund local news, or philanthropic support for investigative journalism on matters of public significance. Some countries have successfully implemented tax incentives for journalism subscriptions or grants for nonprofit news organizations.

What’s crucial is recognizing that free news comes with hidden costs – either degraded quality, advertising manipulation, or billionaire ownership with attendant biases. If we want journalism that truly serves public interest rather than private interests, we need to be willing to fund it appropriately, whether through direct payment, taxation, or hybrid models.

The worst outcome would be if quality journalism becomes a luxury good accessible only to the wealthy while everyone else consumes low-quality, algorithm-driven content. That’s a recipe for societal fragmentation and democratic erosion.

Phân tích:

Structure: Masterful với dilemma acknowledgment → free news arguments → paid news arguments → nuanced personal position với multiple models → concerns about extremes → strong conclusion
Vocabulary: Exceptional: “vexing dilemmas”, “conceive of”, “informed elite”, “perverse incentives”, “optimize for”, “degraded”, “resource-intensive”, “attendant biases”, “fragmentation”, “recipe for”
Grammar: Full sophisticated range với complex embedding, hypotheticals, conditionals used naturally throughout
Critical Thinking:
- Multi-dimensional analysis (democratic, economic, equity, quality perspectives)
- Acknowledges complexity (“no straightforward answer”, “depends on”)
- Uses concrete examples (BBC, PBS, Netflix analogy)
- Proposes nuanced solutions (mixed ecosystem, tiered access)
- Considers consequences of different models
- Ethical reasoning (public good, equity, democratic implications)
- Economic analysis (sustainability, incentive structures)
- Strong personal position clearly articulated with reasoning
- Warns about worst-case scenario

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
breaking news	n	/ˈbreɪkɪŋ njuːz/	tin nóng, tin khẩn	I heard the breaking news about the earthquake while scrolling through Twitter.	breaking news story, breaking news coverage, breaking news alert, breaking news report
credible source	n	/ˈkredəbl sɔːrs/	nguồn tin đáng tin cậy	It’s important to verify information with credible sources before sharing.	highly credible source, credible news source, credible information source
media outlet	n	/ˈmiːdiə ˈaʊtlet/	cơ quan truyền thông	Major media outlets covered the story extensively.	traditional media outlet, mainstream media outlet, reputable media outlet, established media outlet
misinformation	n	/ˌmɪsɪnfəˈmeɪʃn/	thông tin sai lệch (không cố ý)	Social media platforms are struggling to combat misinformation.	spread misinformation, combat misinformation, misinformation campaign
disinformation	n	/ˌdɪsɪnfəˈmeɪʃn/	thông tin giả mạo (cố ý)	The government accused foreign actors of spreading disinformation.	deliberate disinformation, spread disinformation, disinformation campaign
echo chamber	n	/ˈekoʊ ˈtʃeɪmbər/	buồng vang (người chỉ tiếp nhận thông tin phù hợp quan điểm của mình)	Social media algorithms can create echo chambers where people only see views they agree with.	create echo chambers, trapped in echo chambers, break out of echo chambers
filter bubble	n	/ˈfɪltər ˈbʌbl/	bong bóng lọc thông tin	Personalized news feeds can trap us in filter bubbles.	stuck in filter bubble, burst filter bubble, escape filter bubble
viral content	n	/ˈvaɪrəl ˈkɒntent/	nội dung lan truyền nhanh	The video became viral content within hours.	create viral content, viral content spread, viral content marketing
fact-checking	n	/fækt ˈtʃekɪŋ/	việc kiểm tra sự thật	Fact-checking has become essential in the age of social media.	rigorous fact-checking, independent fact-checking, fact-checking organization
headline	n	/ˈhedlaɪn/	tiêu đề tin tức	The headline grabbed my attention immediately.	catchy headline, misleading headline, sensational headline, front-page headline
journalism ethics	n	/ˈdʒɜːrnəlɪzəm ˈeθɪks/	đạo đức nghề báo	Journalism ethics requires verification before publication.	uphold journalism ethics, journalism ethics standards, journalism ethics code
press freedom	n	/pres ˈfriːdəm/	tự do báo chí	Press freedom is essential for democracy.	protect press freedom, press freedom index, threaten press freedom, press freedom violations
news coverage	n	/njuːz ˈkʌvərɪdʒ/	sự đưa tin, phạm vi đưa tin	The news coverage of the event was extensive.	extensive news coverage, balanced news coverage, biased news coverage, media news coverage
current affairs	n	/ˈkʌrənt əˈfeərz/	thời sự	I try to keep up with current affairs by reading daily.	discuss current affairs, current affairs program, global current affairs
investigative journalism	n	/ɪnˈvestɪɡətɪv ˈdʒɜːrnəlɪzəm/	báo chí điều tra	Investigative journalism uncovered the corruption scandal.	in-depth investigative journalism, investigative journalism team, investigative journalism award
sensationalism	n	/senˈseɪʃənəlɪzəm/	chủ nghĩa giật gân	Some outlets resort to sensationalism to attract viewers.	media sensationalism, avoid sensationalism, tabloid sensationalism
gatekeeping	n	/ˈɡeɪtkiːpɪŋ/	kiểm duyệt thông tin	Traditional media performed a gatekeeping function that social media lacks.	media gatekeeping, gatekeeping role, gatekeeping power
public interest	n	/ˈpʌblɪk ˈɪntrəst/	lợi ích công chúng	Journalists should prioritize public interest over profits.	serve public interest, public interest journalism, in the public interest
media literacy	n	/ˈmiːdiə ˈlɪtərəsi/	hiểu biết về truyền thông	Media literacy education helps people evaluate news critically.	improve media literacy, media literacy skills, media literacy program
news aggregator	n	/njuːz ˈæɡrɪɡeɪtər/	ứng dụng tổng hợp tin tức	I use a news aggregator app to collect stories from various sources.	news aggregator platform, news aggregator service, online news aggregator

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
strike a chord with someone	gây được sự đồng cảm, tạo tiếng vang với ai đó	The story about healthcare reform really struck a chord with elderly voters.	7.5-9
keep abreast of	cập nhật thông tin liên tục về	I try to keep abreast of technological developments by reading industry news.	7.5-8
take with a pinch of salt	không tin hoàn toàn, giữ thái độ hoài nghi	You should take social media news with a pinch of salt until verified.	7-8
spread like wildfire	lan truyền cực nhanh	The rumor spread like wildfire across social media platforms.	7-8
if it bleeds, it leads	tin xấu thu hút sự chú ý (nguyên tắc báo chí)	Media often follows the principle “if it bleeds, it leads,” focusing on tragedy.	8-9
make headlines	trở thành tiêu điểm tin tức	The scandal made headlines in newspapers around the world.	7-8
hit home	chạm đến cảm xúc sâu sắc, làm ai đó nhận ra điều gì	The news about climate change really hit home when floods affected my hometown.	7.5-8
food for thought	điều đáng suy nghĩ	The documentary provided interesting food for thought about media manipulation.	7-8
jump on the bandwagon	đi theo số đông, làm theo trào lưu	Many outlets jumped on the bandwagon, covering the same story repeatedly.	7.5-8
separate the wheat from the chaff	phân biệt cái tốt và cái xấu, lọc thông tin	With so much information available, it’s crucial to separate the wheat from the chaff.	8-9
double-edged sword	con dao hai lưỡi (có cả lợi và hại)	Social media is a double-edged sword for journalism – it democratizes but also spreads misinformation.	7.5-8
grain of truth	chút sự thật trong lời nói dối	Most effective fake news contains a grain of truth that makes it believable.	7.5-8

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

📝 Well,… – Dùng khi cần suy nghĩ một chút hoặc chuẩn bị đưa ra câu trả lời phức tạp
📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc sự thật có thể bất ngờ
📝 To be honest,… – Khi nói thật lòng, đặc biệt khi ý kiến có thể khác với mong đợi
📝 I’d say that… – Cách mềm mại để đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân
📝 From my perspective,… – Nhấn mạnh đây là góc nhìn riêng
📝 In my view,… – Tương tự, đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân

Để bổ sung ý:

📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó, để add thêm point
📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, tương tự moreover nhưng tự nhiên hơn
📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến, để thêm point quan trọng
📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó (formal hơn)
📝 Moreover,… – Hơn nữa (formal)
📝 Furthermore,… – Thêm nữa (academic)

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… Mặt khác…
📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét…
📝 That said,… – Dù vậy, để giới thiệu ý contrast
📝 Having said that,… – Sau khi nói điều đó, để pivot sang ý khác
📝 However,… – Tuy nhiên
📝 Nevertheless,… – Dù vậy, tuy nhiên (formal hơn)

Để kết luận:

📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, kết luận tổng thể
📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, về bản chất
📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng, về cơ bản
📝 In essence,… – Về bản chất
📝 To sum up,… – Tóm lại
📝 In conclusion,… – Kết luận (formal, ít dùng trong speaking)

Để làm rõ hoặc giải thích:

📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là…
📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác
📝 To put it another way,… – Nói theo cách khác
📝 Essentially,… – Về cơ bản
📝 Basically,… – Về cơ bản (informal hơn)

Để đưa ra ví dụ:

📝 For instance,… – Ví dụ
📝 For example,… – Ví dụ
📝 Take… for example – Lấy… làm ví dụ
📝 A case in point is… – Một trường hợp điển hình là (formal)

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional (kết hợp quá khứ và hiện tại):

Formula: If + past perfect, would/could/might + base verb
Ví dụ: “If social media hadn’t emerged, traditional journalism would still be the dominant force today.”

Third conditional với inversion (đảo ngữ – rất impressive):

Formula: Had + subject + past participle, would have + past participle
Ví dụ: “Had the newspaper invested in digital platforms earlier, they wouldn’t have faced bankruptcy.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clause:

Formula: …, which/who/where…
Ví dụ: “The BBC, which is funded by public license fees, maintains editorial independence.”
Ví dụ: “Investigative journalism, which requires significant resources, is becoming increasingly rare.”

Reduced relative clause:

Formula: Subject + verb-ing/past participle
Ví dụ: “News stories focusing on sensationalism tend to get more clicks.”
Ví dụ: “Information verified by multiple sources is more reliable.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive để express general opinions:

It is thought/believed/said that…
- Ví dụ: “It is widely believed that news media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion.”
It is argued/claimed that…
- Ví dụ: “It is often argued that free news leads to lower quality journalism.”

Passive với modal verbs:

Formula: Modal + be + past participle
Ví dụ: “Fake news can be easily spread through social media platforms.”
Ví dụ: “Quality journalism should be valued and adequately funded.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ – để emphasize):

What-cleft:

Formula: What + subject + verb + is/was…
Ví dụ: “What really concerns me is the erosion of fact-checking standards.”
Ví dụ: “What I find most troubling is how easily misinformation spreads.”

It-cleft:

Formula: It is/was… that/who…
Ví dụ: “It was the investigative reporting that uncovered the corruption scandal.”
Ví dụ: “It’s the algorithm that determines which news we see.”

The thing that/The reason why:

Ví dụ: “The thing that distinguishes quality journalism is thorough fact-checking.”
Ví dụ: “The reason why people trust certain outlets is their track record of accuracy.”

5. Inversion (Đảo ngữ – rất academic):

Negative adverbials at the beginning:

Formula: Never/Rarely/Seldom + auxiliary + subject + verb
Ví dụ: “Never before have we had access to so much information.”
Ví dụ: “Rarely do people verify sources before sharing news.”
Ví dụ: “Seldom does sensational news provide real substance.”

Only/Not only at the beginning:

Formula: Only/Not only + auxiliary + subject + verb
Ví dụ: “Only when the scandal broke did people realize the extent of media manipulation.”
Ví dụ: “Not only does social media spread news quickly, but it also amplifies misinformation.”

6. Participle Clauses (Mệnh đề phân từ):

Present participle (-ing):

Ví dụ: “Being aware of media biases, I always cross-reference multiple sources.”
Ví dụ: “Realizing the importance of credible news, many people now subscribe to quality outlets.”

Past participle:

Ví dụ: “Funded by advertising, many news sites prioritize clickable content.”
Ví dụ: “Overwhelmed by information, some people have started practicing news avoidance.”

7. Subjunctive Mood (Thức giả định – formal):

It is essential/important/vital that + subject + base verb:

Ví dụ: “It is essential that journalists verify information before publication.”
Ví dụ: “It is vital that the public develop critical media literacy skills.”

8. Emphatic Do:

Do/Does/Did + base verb (để nhấn mạnh):

Ví dụ: “While some question its value, quality journalism does serve an essential democratic function.”
Ví dụ: “Social media platforms do have a responsibility to combat misinformation.”

9. Advanced Tense Usage:

Present Perfect Continuous (nhấn mạnh continuation):

Ví dụ: “Media outlets have been struggling to adapt to digital platforms for over a decade.”
Ví dụ: “Researchers have been studying the effects of news fatigue on public engagement.”

Future Perfect (dự đoán hoàn thành trong tương lai):

Ví dụ: “By 2030, traditional newspapers will have largely disappeared from daily life.”

Bạn có thể khám phá thêm cách sử dụng các cấu trúc ngữ pháp phức tạp trong bài viết describe a book you want to read in the future, nơi các câu điều kiện và mệnh đề quan hệ được sử dụng một cách tự nhiên và hiệu quả.

Lời khuyên cuối cùng từ góc nhìn Examiner

Với hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm chấm thi IELTS Speaking, tôi muốn chia sẻ một số insights quan trọng về chủ đề news và cách tối ưu hóa điểm số của bạn:

Về việc chọn tin tức trong Part 2:

Nhiều thí sinh lo lắng phải chọn một tin tức “quan trọng” hay “nổi tiếng” trên thế giới. Thực tế, examiner không đánh giá dựa trên tầm quan trọng thực sự của tin tức mà dựa trên khả năng bạn articulate why it was important TO YOU và develop câu chuyện một cách coherent.

Một tin tức về local school policy có thể score cao hơn một tin về international summit nếu bạn có thể:

Describe nó vividly với specific details
Explain personal connection và emotional response
Analyze impact một cách thoughtful
Demonstrate language range trong việc discuss nó

Về Part 3 discussions:

Đây là nơi phân biệt Band 7 và Band 8+. Những điểm quan trọng:

Don’t memorize answers: Examiners nhận ra ngay khi thí sinh recite prepared responses. Thay vào đó, practice thinking structures và flexibility.
Embrace complexity: Đừng sợ nói “It depends” hoặc “There are multiple perspectives.” Sophisticated answers acknowledge nuance.
Use personal insights judiciously: Part 3 không phải về personal stories nhưng occasional personal examples để illustrate broader points rất effective.
Challenge assumptions diplomatically: Nếu câu hỏi có underlying assumption bạn không đồng ý, bạn có thể respectfully question nó: “Well, I’m not entirely convinced that…, “

Common pitfalls để tránh:

Over-ambitious vocabulary: Dùng từ sophisticated mà bạn không tự tin về pronunciation hoặc usage. Better to use simpler words correctly.
Template language: Cụm như “There are several reasons for this. Firstly… Secondly…” nghe mechanical. Vary your discourse markers.
Lack of examples: Abstract ideas cần grounding trong concrete examples để demonstrate understanding.
Ignoring the “Why/How” component: Many questions ask “Why do you think…” – don’t just state what, explain why.

Strategies để improve fluency:

Practice thinking in English about news: Khi đọc tin, tự hỏi bản thân “How would I describe this? Why is this important?”
Record yourself: Nghe lại recordings để identify hesitations, repetitions, và limited vocabulary.
Paraphrase practice: Đọc headlines và practice expressing cùng idea bằng different words.
Watch native speakers discuss news: TED Talks, news panels, podcasts – note how they structure arguments và use language.

Về pronunciation và delivery:

Even với perfect vocabulary và grammar, unclear pronunciation có thể limit band score. Focus on:

Sentence stress: Emphasize content words, not function words
Intonation patterns: Rising intonation cho questions, falling cho statements
Connected speech: Practice linking words naturally
Pacing: Không cần nói nhanh – clear và measured speaking often sounds more fluent

Đặc biệt cho học viên Việt Nam:

Một số challenges tôi thường thấy:

Thiếu tự tin với opinions: Vietnamese culture khuyến khích modesty và agreement, nhưng IELTS Speaking rewards confident expression of personal views (respectfully, of course).
Overthinking grammar mid-sentence: This causes hesitation. Better to continue with minor error than pause awkwardly để self-correct.
Translation thinking: Trying to translate Vietnamese thoughts directly sang English. Practice thinking directly trong English về topics.
Limited colloquial expressions: Formal English từ textbooks không đủ. Learn how native speakers actually discuss news trong conversational contexts.

Final encouragement:

Nhớ rằng IELTS Speaking không test knowledge của bạn về world events – nó test ability to communicate. Một thí sinh với limited news knowledge nhưng excellent communication skills sẽ score cao hơn someone với encyclopedic knowledge nhưng poor articulation.

Approach mỗi question như a conversation, not an exam. Examiners appreciate genuine communication over mechanical responses. Show your personality, demonstrate your thinking process, và đừng sợ making mistakes – fluency và confidence matter more than perfection.

Để tiếp tục phát triển kỹ năng thảo luận các chủ đề thời sự một cách sâu sắc, bạn có thể tham khảo thêm bài viết describe a recent news story that interested you để có thêm nhiều góc nhìn và cách tiếp cận khác nhau cho cùng một chủ đề.

Practice consistently, stay curious về world around you, và remember – effective communication is a skill that improves with mindful practice. Good luck với IELTS Speaking preparation của bạn!

What are You Looking For?

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe An Important Piece Of News You Heard” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Cue Card

Phân Tích Đề Bài

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Phân Tích Band Điểm

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Media Influence and Credibility

Theme 2: Impact of News on Society

Theme 3: The Future of Journalism

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

Lời khuyên cuối cùng từ góc nhìn Examiner

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời "Describe A Childhood Friend You Are Still In Touch With" - Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

IELTS Reading: Giảm Thiểu Lãng Phí Trong Các Cơ Sở Giáo Dục - Đề Thi Mẫu Có Đáp Án Chi Tiết

Leave a Comment Cancel

Read Next

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe a situation when you felt very frustrated” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe A Time You Were Disappointed” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe a Peaceful Place in Your Neighborhood” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe An Important Piece Of News You Heard” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Cue Card

Phân Tích Đề Bài

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Phân Tích Band Điểm

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Media Influence and Credibility

Theme 2: Impact of News on Society

Theme 3: The Future of Journalism

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

Lời khuyên cuối cùng từ góc nhìn Examiner

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời "Describe A Childhood Friend You Are Still In Touch With" - Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

IELTS Reading: Giảm Thiểu Lãng Phí Trong Các Cơ Sở Giáo Dục - Đề Thi Mẫu Có Đáp Án Chi Tiết

Leave a Comment Cancel

Read Next

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời “Describe a situation when you felt very frustrated” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe A Time You Were Disappointed” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Describe a Peaceful Place in Your Neighborhood” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Đăng ký nhận thông tin bài mẫu