IELTS Speaking: Bí Quyết Học Writing Tiếng Anh Hiệu Quả – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Chủ đề “Learning English Writing” là một trong những chủ đề phổ biến và quan trọng trong kỳ thi IELTS Speaking. Với tư cách là một IELTS Examiner với hơn 20 năm kinh nghiệm, tôi nhận thấy chủ đề này xuất hiện với tần suất cao, đặc biệt từ năm 2020 đến nay. Khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai là Cao, vì việc học viết tiếng Anh là mối quan tâm chung của hầu hết thí sinh IELTS.

Chủ đề này không chỉ giới hạn ở việc nói về kỹ năng writing mà còn liên quan đến nhiều góc độ như: phương pháp học tập, thử thách gặp phải, vai trò của công nghệ, sự khác biệt giữa writing và speaking, cũng như tầm quan trọng của việc viết trong thời đại kỹ thuật số.

Trong bài viết này, bạn sẽ học được:

  • 12 câu hỏi thực tế trong cả 3 Part với bài mẫu chi tiết theo nhiều band điểm (6-7, 7.5-8, 8.5-9)
  • Phân tích sâu về tiêu chí chấm điểm và cách áp dụng band descriptors
  • Hơn 50 từ vựng và cụm từ ăn điểm liên quan đến chủ đề học viết
  • Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn Examiner
  • Những lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam và cách khắc phục
  • Lộ trình chuẩn bị cụ thể để đạt band điểm mục tiêu

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Part 1 của IELTS Speaking kéo dài 4-5 phút, trong đó Examiner sẽ hỏi các câu hỏi ngắn về cuộc sống hàng ngày, sở thích, công việc hoặc học tập của bạn. Đặc điểm nổi bật của Part 1 là các câu hỏi thường liên quan đến trải nghiệm cá nhân và không yêu cầu phân tích sâu.

Chiến lược hiệu quả:

  • Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi trong câu đầu tiên
  • Mở rộng với lý do hoặc ví dụ cụ thể (tổng 2-3 câu)
  • Sử dụng thì hiện tại đơn cho thói quen, hiện tại hoàn thành cho kinh nghiệm
  • Giữ câu trả lời tự nhiên, không quá dài dòng

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

  • Trả lời quá ngắn chỉ “Yes” hoặc “No” không có mở rộng
  • Dùng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “bad”, “like”, “don’t like”
  • Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
  • Sử dụng sai thì động từ (thường dùng quá khứ thay vì hiện tại)

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you like writing?

Question 2: What do you usually write about?

Question 3: Do you prefer writing by hand or typing on a computer?

Question 4: How often do you write in English?

Question 5: Did you enjoy writing when you were a child?

Question 6: What kind of writing do you find most difficult?

Question 7: Do you think writing is an important skill?

Question 8: Have you ever taken a writing course?

Question 9: Do you write emails or messages every day?

Question 10: Would you like to improve your writing skills?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

Question: Do you like writing?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

  • Trả lời trực tiếp có hoặc không
  • Đưa ra lý do cụ thể
  • Thêm ví dụ về loại writing bạn thích hoặc không thích

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I like writing. It helps me express my thoughts clearly. I usually write in my diary or send messages to friends. Sometimes I find it difficult to find the right words, but I enjoy the process.”

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh: Trả lời rõ ràng, có lý do và ví dụ cụ thể về việc viết nhật ký và tin nhắn
  • Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (express, difficult, enjoy), thiếu tính đa dạng về cấu trúc câu
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Câu trả lời đủ dài, có mở rộng nhưng vocabulary và grammar chưa sophisticated

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’d say I’m quite fond of writing, particularly when it comes to creative pieces or reflective journals. Writing allows me to articulate my ideas in a more structured manner than speaking does. What I find most rewarding is the opportunity to refine my thoughts and craft sentences that truly capture what I mean to convey.”

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng cụm từ nâng cao như “fond of”, “articulate my ideas”, “structured manner”, “refine my thoughts”, “capture what I mean to convey”. Cấu trúc câu đa dạng với mệnh đề quan hệ và cấu trúc “What I find most…is”. Ý tưởng sâu sắc khi so sánh writing với speaking.
  • Tại sao Band 8-9: Fluency tự nhiên với discourse marker “I’d say”, vocabulary tinh vi và precise, grammar phức tạp với nhiều mệnh đề, pronunciation rõ ràng

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

  • be fond of: yêu thích cái gì đó
  • articulate ideas: diễn đạt ý tưởng một cách rõ ràng
  • structured manner: cách thức có cấu trúc
  • refine thoughts: trau chuốt suy nghĩ
  • capture what I mean to convey: nắm bắt được điều tôi muốn truyền đạt

Question: Do you prefer writing by hand or typing on a computer?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

  • Nêu rõ sở thích của bạn
  • So sánh ưu điểm của cả hai phương pháp
  • Đưa ra ví dụ về tình huống sử dụng từng phương pháp

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I prefer typing on a computer because it’s faster and more convenient. When I type, I can edit my work easily. However, I still write by hand sometimes, especially for personal notes or when I want to remember things better.”

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh: Có so sánh hai phương pháp, nêu được ưu điểm của typing và vẫn đề cập đến handwriting
  • Hạn chế: Từ vựng cơ bản (faster, convenient, easily), thiếu cấu trúc câu phức tạp
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Có đủ nội dung và mở rộng nhưng language range còn hạn chế

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, it really depends on the context. For formal documents or lengthy pieces, I definitely lean towards typing because it’s more efficient and allows me to make amendments without creating a mess. That said, I find handwriting particularly beneficial for brainstorming or jotting down quick notes since research suggests that writing by hand enhances memory retention and cognitive processing.”

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh: Sử dụng cấu trúc điều kiện “depends on the context”, vocabulary nâng cao như “lean towards”, “make amendments”, “cognitive processing”, “memory retention”. Thể hiện kiến thức rộng khi đề cập đến research. Câu trả lời balanced khi xem xét cả hai góc độ.
  • Tại sao Band 8-9: Natural discourse markers (Well, That said), precise vocabulary, complex sentence structures, shows critical thinking

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

  • depends on the context: tùy thuộc vào ngữ cảnh
  • lean towards: có xu hướng thiên về
  • make amendments: thực hiện sửa đổi
  • jotting down: ghi chép nhanh
  • memory retention: khả năng ghi nhớ
  • cognitive processing: quá trình xử lý nhận thức

Question: How often do you write in English?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

  • Nêu tần suất cụ thể (daily, weekly, occasionally)
  • Đưa ra các tình huống hoặc mục đích viết tiếng Anh
  • Có thể đề cập đến sự thay đổi theo thời gian

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I write in English almost every day. I need to write emails for work and sometimes I write posts on social media. I also practice writing essays for my IELTS exam. It’s important for my career, so I try to write as much as possible.”

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh: Nêu được tần suất cụ thể và nhiều tình huống khác nhau (work, social media, exam preparation)
  • Hạn chế: Cấu trúc câu đơn giản, từ vựng cơ bản (important, try, as much as possible)
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Có đủ information nhưng thiếu sophisticated language

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“English writing is actually an integral part of my daily routine. I’m constantly drafting emails and reports for work, which requires quite a formal register. Beyond that, I make it a point to engage in more creative writing, such as blogging or contributing to online forums about topics I’m passionate about. Over the past year, I’ve significantly ramped up my English writing practice as I’m preparing for IELTS, which has really pushed me to be more articulate and precise in my expression.”

Phân tích:

  • Điểm mạnh: Vocabulary đa dạng và tinh vi (integral part, drafting, formal register, ramped up, articulate, precise). Sử dụng present continuous và present perfect để thể hiện actions đang diễn ra và changes over time. Ý tưởng phong phú với nhiều loại writing khác nhau.
  • Tại sao Band 8-9: Natural flow với “actually”, “beyond that”, wide range of vocabulary, complex grammatical structures, shows development over time

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

  • an integral part of: một phần không thể thiếu của
  • drafting: soạn thảo (bản nháp)
  • formal register: văn phong trang trọng
  • engage in: tham gia vào
  • passionate about: say mê về
  • ramp up: tăng cường đáng kể
  • articulate: diễn đạt rõ ràng, mạch lạc

Học viên đang thực hành viết tiếng Anh cho bài thi IELTS với các bài mẫu band điểm caoHọc viên đang thực hành viết tiếng Anh cho bài thi IELTS với các bài mẫu band điểm cao

Việc hiểu rõ cách trả lời các câu hỏi Part 1 một cách tự nhiên và mở rộng phù hợp sẽ giúp bạn tạo ấn tượng tốt ngay từ đầu với Examiner. Tương tự như describe a time when you were very happy with your work, việc thể hiện được sự tiến bộ và nỗ lực của bản thân trong quá trình học viết sẽ làm câu trả lời của bạn trở nên sinh động và thuyết phục hơn.

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Part 2 là phần thử thách nhất của IELTS Speaking, chiếm 3-4 phút trong tổng số 11-14 phút của bài thi. Bạn sẽ có đúng 1 phút để chuẩn bị và phải nói liên tục trong 2-3 phút về một chủ đề cụ thể được đưa ra trên cue card.

Đặc điểm của Part 2:

  • Độc thoại không bị ngắt (Examiner sẽ không hỏi gì trong khi bạn nói)
  • Phải cover đầy đủ tất cả các bullet points
  • Thời gian nói tối thiểu 1.5 phút, lý tưởng là 2 phút
  • Có thể sử dụng notes nhưng không được đọc

Chiến lược sử dụng 1 phút chuẩn bị:

  • Đọc kỹ cue card và gạch chân keywords
  • Ghi chú theo từng bullet point (chỉ keywords, không viết câu hoàn chỉnh)
  • Nghĩ ra 1-2 ví dụ cụ thể
  • Plan structure: Introduction → Body (follow bullet points) → Conclusion

Lỗi thường gặp:

  • Không sử dụng hết 1 phút chuẩn bị và bắt đầu nói ngay
  • Nói dưới 1.5 phút hoặc dừng giữa chừng
  • Bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points
  • Nói không đúng thì (thường là quá khứ cho experience)
  • Đọc thuộc lòng template không linh hoạt

Cue Card

Describe a time when you learned to write something in English.

You should say:

  • What you learned to write
  • When and where you learned it
  • How you learned it
  • And explain how you felt about this learning experience

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an experience/event – đây là dạng kể về một trải nghiệm cụ thể trong quá khứ

Thì động từ: Chủ yếu là quá khứ đơn và quá khứ tiếp diễn cho phần kể chuyện. Có thể dùng hiện tại để đưa ra nhận xét hoặc so sánh với hiện tại.

Bullet points phải cover:

  • What: Loại writing gì (essay, email, report, creative writing)
  • When/Where: Thời điểm cụ thể (năm, tuổi) và địa điểm (trường học, khóa học, tự học online)
  • How: Phương pháp học (teacher-led, self-study, online course, practice)
  • Explain feelings: Đây là phần quan trọng nhất – phải thể hiện cảm xúc, suy nghĩ và tác động của trải nghiệm này

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Phần explain feelings thường chiếm 30-40% thời gian nói và là nơi bạn có thể ghi điểm cao nhất vì đây là lúc thể hiện được vocabulary về emotions, reflective thinking và personal insights.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

“I’d like to talk about a time when I learned to write formal emails in English. This happened about two years ago when I started working at an international company in Ho Chi Minh City.

Before that, I only wrote casual messages to friends, so I didn’t know how to write professional emails. My manager noticed this and suggested I should improve my email writing skills. She gave me some templates and examples of good business emails.

I learned by reading these examples carefully and trying to copy the style. I also used online resources and YouTube videos about business email writing. Every time I needed to send an email, I would draft it first and ask my colleague to check it before sending. This helped me learn from my mistakes.

At first, I felt quite nervous because I was worried about making errors. It was challenging to find the right tone and choose appropriate words. But after a few weeks of practice, I became more confident. Now I can write emails quite well and I don’t need to ask for help anymore.

I felt really proud of myself when my manager praised my improvement. This experience taught me that practice is very important when learning to write in English. It also made me realize that writing skills are essential for my career.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí Band Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence 6-7 Có sử dụng linking words cơ bản (before that, at first, but, also). Ý tưởng được sắp xếp theo thứ tự logic nhưng còn đơn giản. Một số hesitation nhẹ.
Lexical Resource 6-7 Từ vựng đủ để truyền đạt ý nhưng còn basic (challenging, confident, proud, essential). Có một số collocations đúng (formal emails, business emails, draft it first).
Grammatical Range & Accuracy 6-7 Sử dụng đúng thì quá khứ cho narrative. Có một số câu phức (when-clause, before-clause) nhưng chủ yếu là câu đơn và câu ghép. Ít lỗi ngữ pháp.
Pronunciation 6-7 Phát âm rõ ràng, dễ hiểu. Trọng âm từ đúng. Ngữ điệu tương đối tự nhiên nhưng có thể còn monotone ở một số đoạn.

Điểm mạnh:

  • ✅ Trả lời đầy đủ tất cả bullet points theo đúng trình tự
  • ✅ Có timeline rõ ràng và ví dụ cụ thể về formal emails
  • ✅ Thể hiện được progression từ nervous đến confident
  • ✅ Có reflection về importance of practice

Hạn chế:

  • ⚠️ Vocabulary còn đơn giản, thiếu sophisticated expressions
  • ⚠️ Grammar structures không đa dạng, chủ yếu là simple và compound sentences
  • ⚠️ Phần feelings chưa sâu sắc, chỉ mô tả cảm xúc bề mặt
  • ⚠️ Thiếu idiomatic expressions và advanced phrases

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

“I’d like to share an experience about learning to write academic essays in English, which took place during my first year at university, roughly three years ago.

At that time, I was enrolled in an English for Academic Purposes course, which was mandatory for all freshmen at my university in Hanoi. The focus was specifically on crafting well-structured essays with proper citations and coherent arguments – something I had little to no experience with before.

The learning process was quite systematic. Our instructor started by breaking down the components of an academic essay – the introduction with a thesis statement, body paragraphs with topic sentences, and a compelling conclusion. We were given various model essays to analyze, and I remember spending hours dissecting them to understand how writers developed their arguments and supported them with evidence.

What really helped me improve was the peer review sessions. After writing our drafts, we would exchange papers and provide constructive feedback to each other. This was eye-opening because I could see different writing styles and learn from my classmates’ strengths while also identifying areas where I needed improvement.

Initially, I felt quite overwhelmed by all the conventions and rules. I remember struggling with maintaining an objective tone and avoiding personal pronouns. However, as I gradually grasped these concepts and applied them in my writing, I experienced a real sense of accomplishment.

By the end of the semester, I had significantly enhanced my academic writing skills. What made this experience particularly rewarding was not just the improvement in my grades, but also the realization that effective writing is about clear thinking and logical organization. This learning experience has proven invaluable in my academic journey, and I continue to apply these principles whenever I need to write formal documents or research papers.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí Band Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence 7.5-8 Flow tự nhiên với discourse markers đa dạng (At that time, Initially, However, By the end). Ý tưởng được phát triển logic và có depth. Ít hesitation.
Lexical Resource 7.5-8 Wide range of vocabulary: enrolled in, mandatory, dissecting, eye-opening, constructive feedback, conventions, grasped. Có collocations tự nhiên. Paraphrasing tốt.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy 7.5-8 Variety of complex structures: relative clauses, participle clauses, conditionals. Sử dụng passive voice phù hợp. Rất ít lỗi và không ảnh hưởng đến communication.
Pronunciation 7.5-8 Clear articulation, appropriate intonation, natural stress patterns, effective use of pausing for emphasis.

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh Band 6-7 Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary “formal emails”, “professional”, “challenging” “academic essays”, “mandatory”, “systematic”, “conventions”, “eye-opening”
Grammar Simple and compound sentences: “She gave me some templates” Complex structures: “which was mandatory for all freshmen”, “spending hours dissecting them”
Ideas Mô tả basic process và feelings Chi tiết về methodology, peer review, và deeper reflection về clear thinking

Tại sao Band 7.5-8:

  • Vocabulary precise và topic-specific (thesis statement, topic sentences, peer review)
  • Grammar structures đa dạng và accurate
  • Ideas well-developed với specific examples
  • Natural fluency với minimal hesitation
  • Shows progression và reflection sâu sắc hơn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

“I’d like to recount an experience that was truly transformative for my English writing skills – learning to write persuasive arguments during a summer intensive course at the British Council in Hanoi, which I attended about four years ago.

The course was specifically tailored for students preparing for university studies abroad, and it placed particular emphasis on developing critical thinking and argumentation skills through writing. What made this different from typical writing classes was the holistic approach – we weren’t just learning about sentence structure and grammar mechanics, but rather how to construct compelling narratives that could genuinely persuade an audience.

The methodology was quite immersive. Our instructor, who was a published author, introduced us to the concept of rhetorical devices – things like ethos, pathos, and logos – and how to strategically deploy them in our writing. We analyzed exemplary pieces from renowned writers and deconstructed their techniques. I particularly remember one session where we examined Martin Luther King Jr.’s ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’ and dissected how he masterfully wove together emotional appeals with logical reasoning.

What really elevated my learning was the rigorous practice regimen. We had to write something every single day – sometimes it was a short op-ed piece, other times a longer analytical essay. The feedback was incredibly detailed and constructive, often longer than the essays themselves. Our instructor wouldn’t just point out errors, but would pose thought-provoking questions that challenged us to think deeper about our arguments.

The emotional journey was quite intense. Initially, I felt rather intimidated by the caliber of my classmates and the demanding nature of the course. There were moments when I questioned whether I was cut out for this level of academic writing. Self-doubt crept in, especially when my first few essays came back covered in red ink. However, rather than being disheartening, this proved to be a catalyst for growth.

What I found most profound about this experience was the metacognitive awareness it developed. I began to understand that effective writing isn’t just about stringing words together – it’s about understanding your audience, anticipating counterarguments, and crafting a narrative arc that guides readers inexorably toward your conclusion. This realization was genuinely eye-opening and fundamentally changed how I approach not just writing, but thinking itself.

By the course’s end, I had undergone a remarkable transformation. The confidence I gained was palpable – I no longer shied away from complex topics or controversial positions. More importantly, I learned that powerful writing stems from clear thinking and that the process of writing is, in itself, a form of intellectual discovery.

This experience has had lasting ramifications for my academic and professional life. The skills I acquired have proven indispensable, whether I’m drafting research proposals, writing business reports, or even composing personal correspondence. It taught me that mastery in writing is not a destination but rather an ongoing journey of continuous refinement and perpetual learning.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí Band Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence 8.5-9 Exceptional flow với sophisticated discourse markers. Ý tưởng phát triển naturally và có great depth. Absolutely no hesitation. Perfect coherence.
Lexical Resource 8.5-9 Sophisticated và precise vocabulary: recount, transformative, tailored, deploy, dissected, rigorous, palpable, ramifications. Idiomatic expressions tự nhiên: cut out for, covered in red ink, shied away from.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy 8.5-9 Full range of structures used naturally: cleft sentences, inversion, participle clauses, complex conditionals. Virtually error-free.
Pronunciation 8.5-9 Native-like features: natural intonation patterns, appropriate stress, clear articulation, effective pausing and emphasis.

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Bài nói flow extremely naturally với absolutely no hesitation. Discourse markers được sử dụng một cách sophisticated và varied (I’d like to recount, What made this different, What really elevated, By the course’s end). Thể hiện được ability để maintain coherent speech cho extended period.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

  • “transformative” thay vì “life-changing” – more academic và precise
  • “strategically deploy” thay vì “use” – shows nuanced understanding
  • “masterfully wove together” – vivid và sophisticated collocation
  • “catalyst for growth” – metaphorical language ở appropriate level
  • “inexorably” – high-level adverb showing advanced vocabulary
  • “palpable” – precise adjective cho describing confidence
  • “lasting ramifications” – sophisticated alternative cho “long-term effects”

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

  • Cleft sentence: “What made this different from typical writing classes was…”
  • Participle clause: “The course was specifically tailored for students preparing…”
  • Complex relative clause: “Our instructor, who was a published author, introduced us…”
  • Inversion for emphasis: “Rather than being disheartening, this proved to be…”
  • Abstract noun phrases: “The metacognitive awareness it developed”

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:
Không chỉ describe surface-level experience mà đi sâu vào:

  • Methodology và pedagogical approach (rhetorical devices, immersive learning)
  • Specific examples (Martin Luther King Jr.’s letter)
  • Emotional journey with nuance (intimidation → self-doubt → catalyst → transformation)
  • Metacognitive reflection về nature of writing và thinking
  • Long-term impact và transferable skills

Đặc biệt xuất sắc ở:

  • Balance giữa concrete details và abstract reflection
  • Sophisticated vocabulary sử dụng naturally, không forced
  • Shows intellectual depth và critical thinking
  • Personal growth narrative compelling và authentic
  • Demonstrates lasting impact và continued application

Chiến lược trả lời IELTS Speaking Part 2 về học viết tiếng Anh với ghi chú và cue cardChiến lược trả lời IELTS Speaking Part 2 về học viết tiếng Anh với ghi chú và cue card

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Sau khi bạn hoàn thành phần nói 2 phút, Examiner thường hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn liên quan trực tiếp đến những gì bạn vừa nói. Đây không phải là Part 3 chính thức, mà chỉ là câu hỏi chuyển tiếp.

Question 1: Do you still use the writing skills you learned?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, I use them all the time, especially at work when I need to write reports or emails. These skills are very helpful for my job.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Absolutely. Those skills have become second nature to me now. Whether I’m drafting professional correspondence or composing academic papers, I constantly draw upon the techniques I learned. In fact, I’d say that course laid the foundation for much of my professional competence in written communication.”


Question 2: Would you recommend others to take a similar course?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, definitely. I think everyone should learn to write well in English because it’s important for work and study.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
Without hesitation. I genuinely believe that investing in formal writing instruction is one of the most worthwhile endeavors anyone can undertake. Effective written communication is such a transferable skill that it transcends specific careers or fields. It’s not just about writing – it’s about learning to think critically and articulate complex ideas coherently.”

Những bài mẫu trên thể hiện rõ sự khác biệt giữa các band điểm. Để đạt điểm cao trong Part 2, bạn cần kết hợp nhiều yếu tố: vocabulary đa dạng, grammar structures phức tạp, ideas sâu sắc, và khả năng reflect về experience một cách thoughtful. Điều này có điểm tương đồng với describe a time when you helped someone improve their skills khi bạn cần thể hiện được quá trình phát triển và transformation.

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Part 3 là phần cuối cùng và thường được coi là challenging nhất trong IELTS Speaking. Khác với Part 1 (personal questions) và Part 2 (storytelling), Part 3 yêu cầu bạn phải analyze, evaluate, và discuss các vấn đề ở level abstract và societal.

Thời gian: 4-5 phút

Đặc điểm nổi bật:

  • Câu hỏi trừu tượng, theoretical hơn
  • Yêu cầu critical thinking và balanced viewpoints
  • Cần đưa ra reasons, examples, và potential implications
  • Không giới hạn ở personal experience mà phải nói về society, trends, comparisons

Yêu cầu cụ thể:

  • Phân tích: Why/How questions cần explain causes và effects
  • So sánh: Past vs Present, advantages vs disadvantages
  • Đánh giá: Express và justify opinions
  • Dự đoán: Future trends và potential developments

Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả:

  1. Direct answer first – Trả lời trực tiếp câu hỏi trong câu đầu tiên
  2. Explain your reasoning – Đưa ra 2-3 reasons với linking words
  3. Provide examples – Ví dụ từ society, không chỉ personal
  4. Consider different perspectives – Show balanced thinking
  5. Extend naturally – Aim for 3-5 câu (30-45 giây mỗi answer)

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

  • Trả lời quá ngắn, chỉ 1-2 câu không có elaboration
  • Không đưa ra lý lẽ rõ ràng để support opinion
  • Thiếu từ vựng abstract và academic
  • Không acknowledge complexity của issue
  • Chỉ nói về personal experience thay vì broader perspective
  • Hesitate nhiều vì không có ideas prepared

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Importance of Writing Skills


Question 1: Why is writing considered an important skill in modern society?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Opinion + Explanation (Why question)
  • Key words: writing, important skill, modern society
  • Cách tiếp cận: Direct answer → Multiple reasons (2-3) với examples → Conclude hoặc add nuance

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Writing is very important in modern society for several reasons. First, we need writing skills for work because most jobs require us to write emails or reports. Second, writing helps us communicate clearly with others, especially in formal situations. Also, in the digital age, we write a lot on social media and messaging apps, so good writing skills help us express ourselves better. Overall, I think writing is essential for both professional and personal life.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Có direct answer + three reasons + conclusion, basic structure tốt
  • Vocabulary: Adequate nhưng repetitive (important, need, helps), thiếu variety
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Ideas clear nhưng shallow, vocabulary simple, limited grammatical range

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Well, I’d argue that writing has become increasingly crucial in contemporary society for several compelling reasons.

First and foremost, in our knowledge-based economy, the ability to articulate ideas clearly through writing is fundamental to professional success. Whether you’re drafting business proposals, composing research papers, or even crafting persuasive marketing copy, effective written communication can quite literally make or break career opportunities.

Beyond the professional realm, writing serves as a powerful tool for critical thinking. When we write, we’re forced to organize our thoughts coherently, which actually sharpens our analytical abilities. There’s compelling evidence that the process of writing itself enhances cognitive function and deepens understanding of complex subjects.

Moreover, in our increasingly digital world, writing has become the primary mode of communication. We’re constantly engaging through emails, social media posts, and instant messages. The quality of our writing directly impacts how others perceive our professionalism, intelligence, and even trustworthiness. Poorly written communication can lead to misunderstandings or damage one’s reputation, whereas well-crafted messages can build credibility and strengthen relationships.

That said, I think it’s worth noting that the nature of writing is evolving. While formal writing conventions remain important, we’re also seeing the emergence of new forms of written expression adapted to digital platforms.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Exceptionally well-organized: Direct answer → Reason 1 (professional) + explanation → Reason 2 (cognitive) + evidence → Reason 3 (digital communication) + implications → Nuanced conclusion
  • Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise: increasingly crucial, compelling reasons, articulate ideas, make or break, sharpens analytical abilities, cognitive function, primary mode, well-crafted messages
  • Grammar: Wide range: passive voice (has become increasingly crucial), cleft sentences (what I find most…), conditionals implied, relative clauses
  • Critical Thinking: Shows depth với multiple dimensions (professional, cognitive, social), acknowledges evolution of writing

💡 Key Language Features:

  • Discourse markers: Well, First and foremost, Beyond…, Moreover, That said
  • Tentative language: I’d argue that, I think it’s worth noting
  • Academic collocations: compelling evidence, cognitive function, primary mode
  • Abstract nouns: professionalism, credibility, trustworthiness, emergence

Question 2: How has technology changed the way people write?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Compare & Contrast (How/Changes)
  • Key words: technology, changed, way people write
  • Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge changes → Discuss specific transformations (2-3 aspects) → Evaluate positive/negative impacts → Balanced conclusion

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Technology has changed writing in many ways. Now we use computers and smartphones instead of pen and paper, so writing is much faster and easier. We can also use autocorrect and grammar checkers to fix our mistakes. Another change is that we write shorter messages because of social media and texting. People use abbreviations and emojis more often. I think technology makes writing more convenient, but sometimes people become too dependent on spell-check and don’t learn proper spelling.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Lists changes but lacks sophistication in organization
  • Vocabulary: Basic words (changed, faster, easier, convenient), limited range
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers main ideas nhưng analysis superficial, lacks depth

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Technology has fundamentally transformed the writing landscape in ways that would have been unimaginable just a few decades ago.

Perhaps the most obvious shift is the sheer speed and convenience of digital writing. What once required careful planning and manual revision can now be done with unprecedented efficiency. We have sophisticated tools like grammar checkers, AI-powered writing assistants, and instant spell-correction that can catch errors in real-time. This has democratized quality writing to some extent, making it more accessible to people who might have struggled with technical aspects of language.

However, there’s also been a notable shift in writing style. The rise of instant messaging and social media has ushered in a more informal, conversational tone even in contexts that were traditionally formal. We’re seeing the proliferation of abbreviations, emojis, and fragmented sentences that prioritize brevity over formality. While this reflects the evolution of language, some linguists worry about the potential erosion of more structured writing skills.

On a deeper level, technology has changed how we think about writing as a process. The ability to easily edit, reorganize, and collaborate on documents in real-time has made writing more iterative and dynamic. Tools like cloud storage and collaborative platforms have transformed writing from a solitary activity into something that can be genuinely collaborative and interactive.

That being said, there are legitimate concerns about over-reliance on technology. When autocorrect and AI suggestions do the heavy lifting, there’s a risk that people might not develop fundamental skills like spelling, grammar, and critical thinking about language choices. It’s a double-edged sword – technology enhances our capabilities but might also atrophy certain skills if we’re not mindful.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Sophisticated organization: Main transformation → Style changes + implications → Process changes → Balanced evaluation with concerns
  • Vocabulary: Advanced and precise: fundamentally transformed, unprecedented efficiency, democratized, proliferation, erosion, iterative, atrophy, double-edged sword
  • Grammar: Complex structures throughout, passive voice, conditionals, relative clauses
  • Critical Thinking: Shows nuanced understanding với both positive và negative aspects, uses academic references (linguists), acknowledges complexity

💡 Key Language Features:

  • Signposting phrases: Perhaps the most obvious shift, On a deeper level, That being said
  • Hedging: to some extent, might have struggled, some linguists worry
  • Academic vocabulary: democratized, proliferation, erosion, iterative, atrophy
  • Metaphorical language: double-edged sword, do the heavy lifting, ushered in

Theme 2: Challenges in Learning to Write

Question 1: What are the main difficulties people face when learning to write in a foreign language?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Problem identification
  • Key words: main difficulties, learning to write, foreign language
  • Cách tiếp cận: Identify 3-4 major challenges → Explain each with reasons/examples → Potentially suggest why these are significant

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“There are several difficulties when learning to write in a foreign language. First, grammar is a big challenge because different languages have different rules. For example, Vietnamese doesn’t have articles like ‘a’ or ‘the’, so Vietnamese learners often make mistakes with these. Second, vocabulary is difficult because we need to know many words to express ideas clearly. Third, we have to understand the writing style of that language, which can be very different from our native language. Also, it’s hard to check if our writing is correct because we might not know if we made mistakes.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Clear listing of challenges với basic explanations
  • Vocabulary: Simple words, some specific example (articles)
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Identifies problems adequately nhưng lacks sophisticated analysis

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Learning to write in a foreign language presents a unique set of challenges that go far beyond simply translating thoughts from one’s native tongue.

One of the most formidable obstacles is mastering the syntactic structures that might be fundamentally different from one’s first language. Take Vietnamese learners of English, for instance. The absence of articles in Vietnamese means that grasping the nuanced usage of ‘a’, ‘an’, and ‘the’ requires rewiring one’s linguistic intuition. Similarly, word order conventions, verb tense systems, and complex grammatical constructions like the passive voice or conditional sentences can be particularly vexing for learners.

Equally challenging is developing an appropriate register and stylistic awareness. Different languages have vastly different conventions regarding formality, directness, and rhetorical organization. For example, English academic writing typically favors a straightforward, linear argument structure, whereas many Asian languages prefer a more circular, implicit approach. Bridging this stylistic gap requires not just linguistic knowledge but cultural adaptation as well.

Another significant hurdle is what linguists call lexical precision – the ability to choose exactly the right word for a given context. In one’s native language, this comes naturally through years of immersion and exposure. In a foreign language, however, learners often struggle with subtle distinctions between synonyms or fail to recognize appropriate collocations. You might know that ‘make’ and ‘do’ both mean to perform an action, but intuitively knowing that we ‘make a decision’ rather than ‘do a decision’ requires extensive exposure to authentic usage.

Perhaps most fundamentally, there’s the challenge of thinking in the target language rather than mentally translating. When learners compose in their first language and then translate, the result often sounds stilted or unnatural, even if technically grammatically correct. Developing the ability to conceptualize and articulate ideas directly in the foreign language is a gradual process that requires immense practice and patience.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Exceptional organization với 4 distinct challenges, each thoroughly explored với examples và implications
  • Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: formidable obstacles, syntactic structures, rewiring linguistic intuition, vexing, stylistic awareness, rhetorical organization, lexical precision, collocations, stilted
  • Grammar: Full range including passive structures, cleft sentences, complex conditionals
  • Critical Thinking: Shows deep understanding của linguistic theory (mentions linguists), provides specific cross-linguistic examples, acknowledges both linguistic và cultural dimensions

Theme 3: Future of Writing

Question 1: Do you think people will write less in the future because of voice recognition technology?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Prediction + Opinion
  • Key words: future, write less, voice recognition technology
  • Cách tiếp cận: State position → Discuss likelihood và reasons → Consider counterarguments → Balanced conclusion về coexistence

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I don’t think people will completely stop writing even with voice recognition technology. While it’s true that voice technology is becoming better and more people use it, writing is still important for many situations. For example, in noisy places, voice recognition doesn’t work well, so we still need to type. Also, some people prefer writing because it’s more private and they can think more carefully about what they want to say. However, I do think people might use voice technology more often for simple tasks like sending quick messages.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Has balanced view với some reasons
  • Vocabulary: Basic vocabulary (better, important, prefer), limited sophistication
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Shows some consideration of different factors nhưng lacks depth

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“While voice recognition technology is undeniably advancing at a remarkable pace, I’d argue that we’re unlikely to see a wholesale abandonment of writing. Rather, what we’re witnessing is an evolution in communication modalities where writing and voice will coexist and complement each other.

There are several reasons why writing will retain its significance. First and foremost, writing offers a level of precision and deliberation that voice input often lacks. When we write, we have the opportunity to carefully craft our message, revise our thoughts, and ensure clarity – something that’s far more challenging with spontaneous speech. This is particularly crucial in professional contexts or when dealing with complex, nuanced ideas that require meticulous articulation.

Moreover, writing has inherent advantages in certain contexts that voice technology cannot easily replicate. In shared spaces or public environments, typing is simply more practical and less intrusive than speaking aloud to your device. There’s also the matter of privacy and discretion – many people prefer writing when discussing sensitive topics or confidential information.

That said, I do anticipate voice recognition will increasingly supplement traditional writing, particularly for routine communications and note-taking. We’re already seeing this trend with voice-to-text features becoming standard on smartphones and the growing popularity of voice assistants. This technology excels at capturing fleeting thoughts quickly and is especially valuable for people with physical limitations that make typing difficult.

However, it’s worth noting that even highly accurate voice recognition has limitations. It struggles with specialized vocabulary, proper nouns, and the subtle nuances of punctuation that are crucial for conveying meaning accurately. Homophone errors – confusing ‘there’, ‘their’, and ‘they’re’, for instance – remain a persistent issue.

Ultimately, I envision a future where writing and voice input exist in a complementary relationship rather than a zero-sum competition. The key will be using the right tool for the right context – voice for quick, informal communication and hands-free situations, and writing for tasks requiring precision, formality, and careful consideration. In this sense, the advent of voice technology doesn’t spell the end of writing, but rather expands our communicative toolkit.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Extremely well-organized: Position statement → Reasons writing will persist → Acknowledge voice technology advantages → Discuss limitations → Balanced conclusion về coexistence
  • Vocabulary: Sophisticated throughout: wholesale abandonment, modalities, meticulous articulation, inherent advantages, fleeting thoughts, homophone errors, complementary relationship, zero-sum competition, advent of, spell the end
  • Grammar: Full range với complex structures, conditionals, relative clauses, passive voice used appropriately
  • Critical Thinking: Shows exceptional depth với consideration of multiple factors (precision vs spontaneity, context appropriateness, accessibility, technical limitations), balanced perspective, forward-thinking conclusion

💡 Key Language Features:

  • Hedging appropriately: I’d argue, unlikely to see, I do anticipate, I envision
  • Signposting: First and foremost, Moreover, That said, However, Ultimately
  • Academic vocabulary: modalities, meticulous, inherent, supplement, advent
  • Metaphorical language: zero-sum competition, spell the end, communicative toolkit

Kỹ năng phân tích và thảo luận trong IELTS Speaking Part 3 về chủ đề viết tiếng AnhKỹ năng phân tích và thảo luận trong IELTS Speaking Part 3 về chủ đề viết tiếng Anh

Việc nắm vững cách trả lời Part 3 với critical thinking và balanced viewpoints là chìa khóa để đạt band điểm cao. Tương tự như describe an experience of good service in a store, việc cung cấp examples cụ thể và phân tích sâu sắc sẽ giúp câu trả lời của bạn trở nên thuyết phục và impressive hơn.


Question 2: What role does handwriting still play in education today?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Evaluate current role/significance
  • Key words: handwriting, role, education, today
  • Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge changing landscape → Identify remaining important roles → Discuss benefits that digital cannot replace → Balanced view on future

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think handwriting is still important in education, although we use computers more now. Students still need to write by hand for exams and tests in most schools. Also, research shows that writing by hand helps students remember information better. When you write notes by hand, you need to process the information more, which helps learning. However, I think in the future, schools might use computers more and handwriting might become less important. But for young children, learning to write by hand is still necessary because it helps develop their motor skills.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Addresses current role và future, mentions some benefits
  • Vocabulary: Some good phrases (motor skills, process information) but generally basic
  • Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate coverage nhưng lacks sophistication in analysis

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“While we’re undeniably transitioning toward a more digitally-dominated educational landscape, handwriting continues to play several vital roles that shouldn’t be underestimated or prematurely dismissed.

From a cognitive perspective, there’s robust scientific evidence suggesting that handwriting engages the brain differently than typing does. When students write by hand, they’re forced to synthesize information and rephrase content in their own words, rather than simply transcribing verbatim as they might with typing. This deeper processing leads to better retention and more meaningful learning. Neuroscience research has shown that handwriting activates multiple areas of the brain simultaneously, creating stronger neural pathways for learning.

In practical terms, handwriting remains indispensable in many formal assessment contexts. Most standardized examinations, including IELTS itself, still require handwritten responses. Students who lack proficiency in handwriting may find themselves at a disadvantage in these high-stakes situations, regardless of their actual knowledge or understanding of the subject matter.

Moreover, particularly for young learners, handwriting serves an important developmental function. The process of learning to form letters and words helps develop fine motor skills, hand-eye coordination, and spatial awareness. There’s also evidence suggesting that the physical act of writing can enhance creative thinking – many writers and artists report that composing by hand allows for a different quality of thought compared to typing.

That being said, I think the educational system needs to strike a pragmatic balance. While handwriting deserves a place in the curriculum, we shouldn’t cling to it dogmatically at the expense of digital literacy. Perhaps the ideal approach is to maintain handwriting as a foundational skill taught in early education, while progressively integrating more digital tools as students advance. This way, students develop competence in both modalities and can choose the appropriate tool for different contexts.

Looking ahead, I suspect handwriting will increasingly become a specialized skill – still valued and practiced, but not the primary mode of written communication. Much like how we still teach mental arithmetic even though calculators are ubiquitous, handwriting will likely remain part of education, but perhaps in a more circumscribed role.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Exceptional organization: Cognitive benefits → Practical necessity → Developmental role → Balanced recommendation → Forward-looking conclusion
  • Vocabulary: Highly sophisticated: prematurely dismissed, robust scientific evidence, synthesize information, transcribing verbatim, neural pathways, indispensable, high-stakes situations, strike a pragmatic balance, circumscribed role
  • Grammar: Full range of complex structures naturally integrated
  • Critical Thinking: Shows exceptional depth với scientific evidence, developmental psychology, practical considerations, và balanced perspective on future

Theme 4: Cultural Differences in Writing

Question 1: Are there differences in writing styles between cultures?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

  • Dạng: Compare & Contrast + Cultural awareness
  • Key words: differences, writing styles, cultures
  • Cách tiếp cận: Acknowledge existence of differences → Provide specific examples (2-3 cultural contrasts) → Explain implications → Consider globalization’s impact

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

Absolutely, and these differences are often more profound than people realize. Writing styles are deeply rooted in cultural values and cognitive patterns that shape how different societies organize and express thoughts.

One of the most striking contrasts is between what linguists call ‘direct‘ versus ‘indirect‘ communication styles. Anglo-American academic writing, for instance, typically follows a very linear, explicit structure – you state your thesis upfront, present your arguments systematically, and reiterate your main point in the conclusion. This reflects Western philosophical traditions that value clarity, logical progression, and directness.

In contrast, many Asian writing traditions favor a more circular, implicit approach. In traditional Japanese writing, for example, the main point often emerges gradually or is even left unstated, with the expectation that the reader will infer the conclusion. This isn’t a deficiency – it reflects different cultural values around subtlety, indirectness, and the importance of contextual understanding. There’s a saying that good writing in some Asian cultures is like ‘the moon behind the clouds‘ – beautiful precisely because it’s not explicitly revealed.

Another significant dimension is formality and politeness conventions. Languages like Korean or Japanese have elaborate systems of honorifics and hierarchical language that must be carefully navigated in writing. The level of formality depends on the relationship between writer and reader, their relative social status, and the specific context. English certainly has formal and informal registers, but the distinctions are considerably less codified.

Interestingly, globalization and the dominance of English in international communication are creating a certain convergence toward Anglo-American writing conventions, particularly in academic and business contexts. However, this raises important questions about linguistic diversity and whether we’re losing valuable alternative ways of structuring thought and expression.

For students preparing for English proficiency exams like IELTS, understanding these differences is crucial. Many struggle not because they lack ideas or language skills, but because they’re trying to apply their native writing conventions to English, where they may not translate effectively.”

Phân tích:

  • Structure: Masterful organization with clear themes and transitions
  • Vocabulary: Exceptionally sophisticated and precise: profound, cognitive patterns, thesis upfront, circular approach, infer, elaborate systems, codified, convergence, linguistic diversity
  • Grammar: Full range used naturally and accurately
  • Critical Thinking: Shows deep cultural awareness, specific examples from multiple cultures, acknowledges complexity và implications, connects to practical applications for IELTS candidates

Một cách tiếp cận tương tự có thể thấy trong describe a person who is very talented in their profession, khi bạn cần phân tích sâu sắc về cultural context và demonstrating sophisticated understanding của các nuances.

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ Loại từ Phiên âm Nghĩa tiếng Việt Ví dụ Collocation
articulate v /ɑːˈtɪkjuleɪt/ diễn đạt rõ ràng She can articulate complex ideas very clearly. articulate ideas/thoughts/opinions/arguments
compelling adj /kəmˈpelɪŋ/ thuyết phục, hấp dẫn He presented a compelling argument in his essay. compelling argument/evidence/reason/narrative
coherent adj /kəʊˈhɪərənt/ mạch lạc, chặt chẽ Good writing should be coherent and well-organized. coherent argument/structure/explanation/narrative
draft n/v /drɑːft/ bản thảo; soạn thảo I always draft my emails before sending them. first draft, draft a document/proposal/letter
refine v /rɪˈfaɪn/ trau chuốt, tinh chỉnh She spent hours refining her writing style. refine skills/thoughts/technique/approach
constructive feedback n phrase /kənˈstrʌktɪv ˈfiːdbæk/ phản hồi mang tính xây dựng Receiving constructive feedback helped me improve significantly. give/provide/receive constructive feedback
synthesize v /ˈsɪnθəsaɪz/ tổng hợp Good writers can synthesize information from multiple sources. synthesize information/ideas/data/findings
nuanced adj /ˈnjuːɑːnst/ tinh tế, có nhiều sắc thái His writing demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the topic. nuanced approach/understanding/view/analysis
rhetoric n /ˈretərɪk/ tu từ học, nghệ thuật hùng biện Understanding rhetoric improves persuasive writing. political rhetoric, powerful rhetoric
prose n /prəʊz/ văn xuôi She writes beautiful prose that captivates readers. clear prose, elegant prose, write in prose
register n /ˈredʒɪstə(r)/ văn phong, lối văn Knowing the appropriate register is crucial in formal writing. formal/informal register, switch register
iteration n /ˌɪtəˈreɪʃn/ sự lặp lại, phiên bản Writing improves through multiple iterations. several iterations, go through iterations
succinct adj /səkˈsɪŋkt/ ngắn gọn, súc tích Good business writing should be succinct and clear. succinct summary/explanation/response
verbose adj /vɜːˈbəʊs/ dài dòng, rườm rà His writing is too verbose and needs editing. verbose style/explanation/writing
paraphrase v /ˈpærəfreɪz/ diễn giải, viết lại Students must learn to paraphrase rather than copy directly. paraphrase a text/statement/quote
plagiarism n /ˈpleɪdʒərɪzəm/ đạo văn Plagiarism is a serious academic offense. avoid plagiarism, commit plagiarism
thesis statement n phrase /ˈθiːsɪs ˈsteɪtmənt/ luận điểm chính A strong thesis statement is essential for essay writing. write/formulate/develop a thesis statement
topic sentence n phrase /ˈtɒpɪk ˈsentəns/ câu chủ đề Each paragraph should begin with a clear topic sentence. strong topic sentence, effective topic sentence
transition n /trænˈzɪʃn/ sự chuyển tiếp Smooth transitions between paragraphs improve flow. smooth transition, make a transition
proofread v /ˈpruːfriːd/ đọc lại, hi教chính Always proofread your work before submission. proofread carefully/thoroughly, proofread a document

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ Nghĩa Ví dụ sử dụng Band điểm
put pen to paper bắt đầu viết Once I put pen to paper, the ideas started flowing naturally. 7-8
read between the lines hiểu ý ngầm Good readers can read between the lines to understand implied meanings. 7-8
get one’s point across truyền đạt ý kiến thành công Effective writing helps you get your point across clearly. 7-8
strike the right tone dùng đúng giọng điệu In formal emails, it’s important to strike the right tone. 7.5-8.5
food for thought điều đáng suy ngẫm The article provided interesting food for thought on writing styles. 7-8
cut to the chase đi thẳng vào vấn đề In business writing, it’s best to cut to the chase. 7-8
hit the nail on the head nói đúng trọng tâm His analysis really hit the nail on the head. 7.5-8.5
leave no stone unturned không bỏ sót điều gì When researching for an essay, you should leave no stone unturned. 8-9
speak volumes nói lên nhiều điều The quality of your writing speaks volumes about your education. 8-9
a double-edged sword con dao hai lưỡi Technology in writing education is a double-edged sword. 8-9
cast in stone không thể thay đổi Writing conventions aren’t cast in stone; they evolve over time. 8-9
the lion’s share phần lớn nhất The lion’s share of my writing time goes to drafting and revising. 8-9

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

  • 📝 Well,… – Dùng khi cần một chút thời gian để suy nghĩ hoặc khi đưa ra câu trả lời thoughtful
  • 📝 Actually,… – Khi đưa ra góc nhìn khác hoặc surprising information
  • 📝 To be honest,… – Khi nói thật về personal opinion
  • 📝 I’d say that… – Cách sophisticated để đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân
  • 📝 From my perspective,… – Nhấn mạnh đây là personal viewpoint

Để bổ sung ý:

  • 📝 On top of that,… – Thêm vào đó (sophisticated hơn “also”)
  • 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn nữa, còn nữa
  • 📝 Not to mention… – Chưa kể đến (cho điều quan trọng)
  • 📝 Beyond that,… – Ngoài ra, xa hơn nữa
  • 📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó (formal)

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

  • 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác…
  • 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… nhưng ta cũng cần xem xét…
  • 📝 That being said,… – Tuy nhiên, điều đó đã nói…
  • 📝 Having said that,… – Đã nói như vậy, nhưng…

Để kết luận:

  • 📝 All in all,… – Tóm lại, nhìn chung
  • 📝 At the end of the day,… – Cuối cùng thì, xét cho cùng
  • 📝 Ultimately,… – Rốt cuộc, về cơ bản
  • 📝 In the final analysis,… – Xét về mặt cuối cùng

Để làm rõ hoặc nhấn mạnh:

  • 📝 What I mean is… – Ý tôi là…
  • 📝 In other words,… – Nói cách khác…
  • 📝 To put it another way,… – Nói theo cách khác…
  • 📝 More specifically,… – Cụ thể hơn…

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional:

  • Formula: If + Past Perfect, … would + bare infinitive
  • Ví dụ: “If I hadn’t taken that writing course, I wouldn’t be as confident in my English writing today.”
  • Sử dụng: Để nói về điều kiện trong quá khứ và kết quả ở hiện tại

Inversion for emphasis:

  • Formula: Had I + past participle, … would have + past participle
  • Ví dụ: “Had I known about the importance of writing skills earlier, I would have started practicing sooner.”
  • Sử dụng: Formal structure, thể hiện level cao

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

  • Formula: …, which/who + clause, …
  • Ví dụ: “The writing course, which lasted three months, significantly improved my skills.”
  • Sử dụng: Thêm thông tin không thiết yếu, sophisticated style

Reduced relative clauses:

  • Formula: Noun + V-ing/V-ed phrase
  • Ví dụ: “Students learning to write in English often struggle with articles.”
  • Sử dụng: Làm câu concise và academic hơn

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive (formal):

  • Formula: It is thought/believed/said/considered that…
  • Ví dụ: “It is widely acknowledged that writing skills are essential in modern workplaces.”
  • Sử dụng: Academic style, khi không muốn specify who

Passive with modal verbs:

  • Formula: Modal + be + past participle
  • Ví dụ: “Writing proficiency can be developed through consistent practice.”
  • Sử dụng: Expressing possibility, necessity trong academic context

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What-cleft for emphasis:

  • Formula: What + subject + verb + is/was…
  • Ví dụ: “What I find most challenging about writing in English is maintaining a consistent tone throughout.”
  • Sử dụng: Nhấn mạnh phần quan trọng của câu

It-cleft for focus:

  • Formula: It + is/was + emphasized part + that/who…
  • Ví dụ: “It was my writing teacher who inspired me to pursue improvement seriously.”
  • Sử dụng: Focus vào specific information

5. Participle Clauses:

Present participle:

  • Formula: V-ing…, subject + verb
  • Ví dụ: “Having practiced writing daily for months, I noticed significant improvement in my fluency.”
  • Sử dụng: Show time relationship, cause-effect

Perfect participle:

  • Formula: Having + past participle…, subject + verb
  • Ví dụ: “Having completed the writing course, I felt much more confident in my abilities.”
  • Sử dụng: Emphasize action completed before main action

6. Inversion for Emphasis:

Negative adverbials:

  • Formula: Never/Rarely/Seldom + auxiliary + subject + verb
  • Ví dụ: “Never have I encountered such effective writing instruction before.”
  • Sử dụng: Dramatic emphasis, formal style

Only + time expression:

  • Formula: Only when/after + auxiliary + subject + verb
  • Ví dụ: “Only after extensive practice did I truly understand the nuances of English writing.”
  • Sử dụng: Emphasize the timing or condition

Từ vựng và cụm từ nâng cao cho IELTS Speaking chủ đề học viết tiếng AnhTừ vựng và cụm từ nâng cao cho IELTS Speaking chủ đề học viết tiếng Anh

Việc nắm vững các cấu trúc ngữ pháp nâng cao này sẽ giúp bạn tạo ấn tượng mạnh với Examiner. Tuy nhiên, điều quan trọng là phải sử dụng chúng một cách tự nhiên và phù hợp với context, tránh việc “nhồi nhét” quá nhiều structures phức tạp làm mất đi sự tự nhiên của câu trả lời.

Chiến Lược Chuẩn Bị Toàn Diện

Lộ Trình Học Tập 8 Tuần

Week 1-2: Foundation Building

  • Practice Part 1 questions daily (3-4 questions/day)
  • Record yourself và listen back để identify hesitations
  • Learn 10-15 topic-specific vocabulary items mỗi ngày
  • Focus on extending answers to 2-3 sentences naturally

Week 3-4: Part 2 Mastery

  • Practice 2-3 cue cards mỗi ngày
  • Time yourself strictly (1 min preparation, 2 min speaking)
  • Work on storytelling techniques và past tense accuracy
  • Build personal example bank cho common topics

Week 5-6: Part 3 Development

  • Study sample Part 3 questions và high-band answers
  • Practice critical thinking về social issues
  • Learn discourse markers và academic vocabulary
  • Record và analyze your complex sentence usage

Week 7-8: Integration & Fine-tuning

  • Do full mock tests (tất cả 3 Parts)
  • Get feedback from teachers hoặc proficient speakers
  • Work on pronunciation và intonation specifically
  • Review và revise all vocabulary learned

Common Mistakes to Avoid

❌ Memorizing và reciting templates:
Examiners can easily detect memorized answers. They sound unnatural và don’t fit questions perfectly.

✅ Instead: Learn flexible phrases và practice adapting them to different contexts.


❌ Using overly complex vocabulary incorrectly:
Using sophisticated words wrongly is worse than using simple words correctly.

✅ Instead: Master vocabulary you’re confident with và gradually add new items.


❌ Speaking too fast:
Many candidates rush, thinking it shows fluency. It actually causes errors và unclear pronunciation.

✅ Instead: Speak at natural pace với appropriate pausing for emphasis.


❌ Giving one-word answers in Part 1:
“Yes”, “No”, “Sometimes” without elaboration shows limited language ability.

✅ Instead: Always extend with reason or example: “Yes, I do. In fact, I write almost every day because…”


❌ Going off-topic in Part 2:
Some candidates talk about unrelated things to fill time.

✅ Instead: Stay focused on all bullet points và explain thoroughly.


❌ Lacking opinion in Part 3:
Saying “I don’t know” or “It depends” without explanation.

✅ Instead: “That’s an interesting question. I’d say…” then develop your viewpoint.

Tips từ góc nhìn Examiner

🎯 What Examiners Really Look For:

  1. Natural Communication: We value natural, conversational English over robotic, template-based responses. Show personality!

  2. Idea Development: Don’t just list points. Develop each idea với explanation, example, hoặc consequence.

  3. Flexible Language Use: Demonstrate you can paraphrase và express same ideas in multiple ways.

  4. Self-correction: Minor self-corrections are actually positive – they show you’re monitoring your language.

  5. Engagement: Eye contact, natural body language, và showing interest in questions make a difference.

🎯 How to Impress:

  • Use a variety of grammatical structures naturally (không forced)
  • Show you understand nuances của questions
  • Provide specific, concrete examples rather than vague generalizations
  • Acknowledge complexity của issues in Part 3
  • Demonstrate cultural awareness và broad knowledge

🎯 Red Flags that Lower Scores:

  • Obviously memorized responses
  • Long pauses hoặc frequent hesitations
  • Repetitive vocabulary (saying “good” 10 times)
  • Grammatical errors that impede communication
  • Consistently short answers
  • Pronunciation issues that make you difficult to understand

Kết Luận

Việc đạt điểm cao trong IELTS Speaking về chủ đề “Learning to Write in English” đòi hỏi sự kết hợp của nhiều yếu tố: vocabulary phong phú, grammar structures đa dạng, ideas sâu sắc, và khả năng communicate naturally.

Hãy nhớ rằng IELTS Speaking không chỉ test kiến thức tiếng Anh mà còn test khả năng sử dụng ngôn ngữ một cách effective trong real communication. Practice consistently, get feedback, và đừng ngại mắc lỗi trong quá trình học.

Với commitment và proper preparation theo hướng dẫn trong bài viết này, bạn hoàn toàn có thể improve significantly và achieve your target band score. Tương tự như describe a difficult challenge you overcame, việc học IELTS Speaking cũng là một journey requires persistence, nhưng kết quả sẽ worth the effort.

Chúc bạn thành công trong kỳ thi IELTS sắp tới!

Previous Article

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời "Describe A Difficult Challenge You Overcame" - Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Next Article

IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề "Describe A Public Figure You Respect" - Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

View Comments (1)

Leave a Comment

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *

Đăng ký nhận thông tin bài mẫu

Để lại địa chỉ email của bạn, chúng tôi sẽ thông báo tới bạn khi có bài mẫu mới được biên tập và xuất bản thành công.
Chúng tôi cam kết không spam email ✨