IELTS Speaking: Cách Trả Lời Chủ Đề “Should I Outline Essay in Introduction IELTS” – Bài Mẫu Band 6-9

Mở bài

Chủ đề về phương pháp viết và cấu trúc bài luận IELTS là một trong những chủ đề thường xuyên xuất hiện trong IELTS Speaking, đặc biệt khi examiner muốn khám phá sâu hơn về kinh nghiệm học tập, kỹ năng viết học thuật và phương pháp chuẩn bị thi của thí sinh. Chủ đề này không chỉ đơn thuần về việc có nên nêu outline trong phần mở bài hay không, mà còn mở rộng ra nhiều góc độ khác nhau như chiến lược làm bài, thói quen học tập, và quan điểm về các kỹ năng học thuật.

Tần suất xuất hiện: Chủ đề này xuất hiện với tần suất trung bình đến cao trong các kỳ thi IELTS từ 2020 đến 2024, đặc biệt trong Part 3 khi thảo luận về education, study methods, và academic skills. Dự đoán khả năng xuất hiện trong tương lai: Cao, vì IELTS ngày càng tập trung vào việc đánh giá khả năng thảo luận về các kỹ năng học thuật và phương pháp học tập.

Những gì bạn sẽ học được:

• 15+ câu hỏi thực tế về study methods, writing skills và academic preparation trong cả 3 Part
• Bài mẫu chi tiết theo 3 mức band điểm (6-7, 7.5-8, 8.5-9) với phân tích chuyên sâu
• 50+ từ vựng và cụm từ academic ăn điểm liên quan đến writing và study skills
• Chiến lược trả lời hiệu quả từ góc nhìn của IELTS Examiner
• Những lỗi phổ biến của học viên Việt Nam khi thảo luận về chủ đề này

---

IELTS Speaking Part 1: Introduction and Interview

Tổng Quan Về Part 1

Thời gian: 4-5 phút

Đặc điểm: Part 1 tập trung vào các câu hỏi ngắn gọn về đời sống hàng ngày, sở thích cá nhân và kinh nghiệm học tập. Với chủ đề writing và study methods, examiner thường hỏi về thói quen học tập, kinh nghiệm viết bài và sở thích đọc sách.

Chiến lược: Trả lời tự nhiên, mở rộng ý (2-3 câu) với cấu trúc: Direct answer → Reason/Example → Personal touch

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn chỉ Yes/No mà không giải thích
• Dùng từ vựng quá đơn giản như “good”, “bad”, “important”
• Thiếu ví dụ cụ thể từ kinh nghiệm bản thân
• Không tự nhiên, nghe như đang đọc thuộc lòng

Các Câu Hỏi Thường Gặp

Question 1: Do you enjoy writing?

Question 2: How often do you write in English?

Question 3: What kind of writing do you do most often?

Question 4: Do you prefer writing by hand or typing on a computer?

Question 5: Did you receive much writing instruction in school?

Question 6: What do you find most challenging about writing?

Question 7: Do you think writing skills are important?

Question 8: Have you ever kept a diary or journal?

Question 9: Do you like to plan before you write?

Question 10: What are your study habits like?

Phân Tích và Gợi Ý Trả Lời Chi Tiết

---

Question: Do you like to plan before you write?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Trả lời trực tiếp Yes/No với qualification (sometimes, usually)
• Đưa ra lý do tại sao bạn plan hoặc không plan
• Thêm ví dụ cụ thể về cách bạn plan (nếu có)

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I usually plan before I write. I think it’s important to organize my ideas first. For example, when I write essays for school, I make a simple outline with main points. This helps me write faster and not forget important ideas.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Trả lời trực tiếp, có lý do và ví dụ cụ thể
• Hạn chế: Từ vựng còn đơn giản (important, simple, helps), cấu trúc câu chưa phức tạp, thiếu chi tiết về quá trình planning
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Answer đáp ứng đầy đủ yêu cầu với structure rõ ràng nhưng vocabulary và grammar chưa sophisticated. Fluency tốt nhưng chưa có advanced expressions.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“Absolutely! I’m a firm believer in the importance of planning ahead. I find that mapping out my main arguments and supporting points before I start writing actually saves me considerable time in the long run. Without a clear roadmap, I tend to go off on tangents and my writing becomes less coherent. So I usually spend a good five to ten minutes brainstorming and sketching out a rough structure.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Vocabulary xuất sắc: “firm believer”, “mapping out”, “go off on tangents”, “coherent”, “brainstorming”
  • Grammar đa dạng: “I find that…”, “without a clear roadmap”, “tend to…”
  • Ideas chi tiết: Giải thích cả benefits và consequences của planning
  • Natural expressions: “Absolutely!”, “in the long run”, “a good five to ten minutes”
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Answer thể hiện Fluency hoàn hảo với idiomatic expressions, Vocabulary precise và topic-specific, Grammar structures phức tạp và natural, Ideas well-developed với clear explanation.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• firm believer in: người tin tưởng mạnh mẽ vào điều gì
• map out: phác thảo, lập kế hoạch chi tiết
• go off on tangents: đi chệch khỏi chủ đề chính
• coherent: mạch lạc, logic
• roadmap: lộ trình, kế hoạch tổng thể

---

Question: What do you find most challenging about writing?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• Xác định một challenge cụ thể (không nói chung chung)
• Giải thích tại sao đó là challenge
• Có thể thêm cách bạn đang cố gắng overcome

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think the most difficult thing for me is finding the right words. Sometimes I know what I want to say in Vietnamese but I can’t express it well in English. Also, grammar is quite hard, especially when I write long sentences.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Honest answer với specific challenges
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary basic (difficult, right words, quite hard), thiếu detail về strategies để overcome, structure đơn giản
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Communicative và clear nhưng lacks sophistication trong expression và development of ideas.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’d say the most challenging aspect is striking the right balance between being concise and being comprehensive. I often find myself overelaborating on points, which can make my writing seem verbose. It’s a delicate art to convey complex ideas in a succinct manner without sacrificing clarity. I’m constantly working on refining this skill through practice and by reading exemplary academic writing.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Sophisticated vocabulary: “strike the right balance”, “concise”, “comprehensive”, “overelaborating”, “verbose”, “succinct”, “sacrificing clarity”
  • Complex ideas: Thảo luận về tension giữa brevity và completeness
  • Self-awareness: Nhận thức được weakness và đang improve
  • Natural discourse: “I’d say”, “I often find myself”, “It’s a delicate art”
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Demonstrates exceptional lexical resource với precise academic vocabulary, complex grammatical structures, và thoughtful reflection on the writing process.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• strike the right balance: tìm được sự cân bằng phù hợp
• concise: súc tích, ngắn gọn
• verbose: dài dòng, rườm rà
• convey complex ideas: truyền đạt những ý tưởng phức tạp
• succinct manner: cách ngắn gọn, súc tích

---

Question: Do you prefer writing by hand or typing on a computer?

🎯 Cách tiếp cận:

• State your preference rõ ràng
• Compare advantages của cả hai methods
• Personal reason tại sao prefer một cách hơn

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I prefer typing on a computer because it’s much faster. When I write by hand, my hand gets tired quickly. Also, it’s easier to fix mistakes on a computer. I can just delete and rewrite. But sometimes for short notes, I still use pen and paper.”

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh: Clear preference với practical reasons
• Hạn chế: Vocabulary repetitive (faster, easier, tired), thiếu sophisticated comparison, ideas còn surface-level
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Adequate communication nhưng lacks depth và advanced language features.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8-9:

“I’m definitely more inclined toward typing these days, primarily because of the efficiency and flexibility it offers. I can organize my thoughts much more quickly and restructure paragraphs with ease. That said, I do recognize the cognitive benefits of handwriting – studies suggest it enhances retention and conceptual understanding. So for brainstorming or initial note-taking, I sometimes prefer the tactile experience of pen and paper, but for formal compositions, digital is my go-to.”

Nếu bạn quan tâm đến việc cải thiện kỹ năng viết học thuật, bạn có thể tham khảo thêm what is your biggest difficulty with ielts writing để hiểu rõ hơn về những thách thức phổ biến và cách vượt qua chúng.

Phân tích:

• Điểm mạnh:
  • Balanced view: Nhận diện advantages của cả hai
  • Academic reference: Mention “studies suggest”
  • Precise vocabulary: “efficiency”, “flexibility”, “cognitive benefits”, “retention”, “tactile experience”
  • Nuanced answer: Different contexts cho different methods
  • Natural flow với discourse markers
• Tại sao Band 8-9: Showcases ability to analyze và compare với sophisticated language, demonstrates critical thinking và awareness of research, maintains natural conversational tone while using advanced vocabulary.

💡 Key Vocabulary & Expressions:

• inclined toward: có xu hướng, nghiêng về
• cognitive benefits: lợi ích về nhận thức
• retention: khả năng ghi nhớ
• tactile experience: trải nghiệm xúc giác
• formal compositions: bài viết trang trọng, chính thức

Học sinh đang lên kế hoạch viết bài luận IELTS với sổ tay và máy tính

---

IELTS Speaking Part 2: Long Turn (Cue Card)

Tổng Quan Về Part 2

Thời gian chuẩn bị: 1 phút
Thời gian nói: 2-3 phút (không bị ngắt)

Đặc điểm: Part 2 yêu cầu bạn nói độc thoại về một chủ đề cụ thể trong 2 phút. Đây là phần kiểm tra khả năng maintain speech flow, organize ideas logically, và use a range of vocabulary and grammar.

Chiến lược:

• Sử dụng trọn vẹn 1 phút để ghi chú keywords (không viết câu hoàn chỉnh)
• Cố gắng nói đủ 2 phút, tối thiểu 1.5 phút
• Cover tất cả bullet points trong cue card
• Organize theo chronological order hoặc logical sequence
• Use past tenses nếu describe past experience

Lỗi thường gặp:

• Lãng phí thời gian chuẩn bị không ghi chú gì
• Nói quá ngắn (dưới 1.5 phút) hoặc ngừng giữa chừng
• Bỏ sót một hoặc nhiều bullet points
• Lặp lại ý tưởng vì không prepare kỹ
• Speak quá nhanh vì nervous

Cue Card

Describe a time when you had to write something important

You should say:

• What you had to write
• Why it was important
• How you prepared for writing it
• And explain how you felt about the result

Phân Tích Đề Bài

Dạng câu hỏi: Describe an experience/event (past event)

Thì động từ: Quá khứ (past simple, past continuous, past perfect)

Bullet points phải cover:

1. What you had to write – Xác định rõ loại writing (essay, report, letter, application)
2. Why it was important – Context và significance
3. How you prepared – Process, strategies, challenges
4. Explain feelings about result – Reflection và evaluation

Câu “explain” quan trọng: Đây là phần ghi điểm cao nhất vì thể hiện ability to reflect, analyze và express complex emotions. Đừng chỉ nói “I felt happy/sad” mà explain WHY và elaborate on the impact.

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7

Thời lượng: Khoảng 1.5-2 phút

“I’d like to talk about a time when I had to write an important essay for my university application. This was about two years ago when I was applying to study business administration.

It was very important because the essay was a big part of my application. The university wanted to know about my goals and why I wanted to study there. If I didn’t write a good essay, I might not get accepted.

To prepare for writing it, I did several things. First, I read many sample essays online to understand what they expected. Then I made an outline with my main ideas. I wrote about my interest in business and my future plans. I also asked my English teacher to check my grammar and give me feedback. After that, I rewrote the essay two or three times to make it better.

About the result, I felt quite nervous when I submitted it. But after a few weeks, I got accepted to the university, so I was really happy. I think all the preparation helped me write a strong essay. This experience taught me that planning and getting feedback are important for good writing.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	6-7	Answer có structure rõ ràng, cover đủ bullet points. Sử dụng basic linking words (First, Then, After that). Flow tốt nhưng chưa sophisticated.
Lexical Resource	6-7	Vocabulary adequate: “application”, “goals”, “feedback”, “submitted”, “accepted”. Có attempts sử dụng collocations như “make it better”, “strong essay” nhưng chủ yếu vẫn là common words.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	6-7	Mix của simple và complex sentences. Có attempts với conditionals (“If I didn’t write”) và relative clauses (“what they expected”). Past tenses chính xác. Một số errors nhỏ.
Pronunciation	6-7	Generally clear và understandable. Có thể có Vietnamese accent nhưng không ảnh hưởng communication.

Điểm mạnh:

• ✅ Cover đầy đủ tất cả bullet points
• ✅ Structure logic và easy to follow
• ✅ Personal experience genuine và relatable
• ✅ Time management tốt (đủ thời gian)

Hạn chế:

• ⚠️ Vocabulary chưa sophisticated, thiếu academic terms
• ⚠️ Ideas development chưa deep, mainly surface-level description
• ⚠️ Thiếu varied sentence structures và advanced grammar
• ⚠️ Emotional reflection ở phần cuối còn basic

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 7.5-8

Thời lượng: Khoảng 2-2.5 phút

“I’d like to share my experience of writing a personal statement for my university application, which was undoubtedly one of the most significant pieces of writing I’ve ever produced. This was roughly two years ago when I was in the midst of applying to several universities for a business program.

The stakes were incredibly high because this essay essentially served as my first impression to the admissions committee. Unlike test scores and grades, which are just numbers, the personal statement was my opportunity to showcase my personality, articulate my aspirations, and demonstrate why I would be a good fit for their institution. In Vietnam’s competitive academic landscape, a compelling personal statement could make or break an application.

My preparation process was quite systematic. I began by conducting thorough research into what admissions officers typically look for – they wanted to see genuine passion, clear goals, and evidence of critical thinking. I brainstormed extensively, jotting down significant experiences that had shaped my interest in business. Then I drafted a detailed outline, organizing my thoughts into a coherent narrative that would flow naturally. The actual writing took several days, during which I went through multiple iterations. I also sought feedback from my English teacher and a mentor who had studied abroad, incorporating their suggestions to refine my arguments and polish my language.

When I finally submitted it, I felt a mixture of relief and anxiety. The waiting period was nerve-wracking. However, when I received my acceptance letter, I was absolutely elated. More importantly, this experience taught me invaluable lessons about the writing process – that good writing requires careful planning, multiple revisions, and willingness to accept constructive criticism. It really reinforced my belief that outlining before writing is essential for producing well-structured, persuasive content.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	7.5-8	Smooth flow với sophisticated linking. Clear progression of ideas. Minimal hesitation. Well-organized narrative.
Lexical Resource	7.5-8	Wide range của vocabulary: “stakes were high”, “articulate aspirations”, “compelling”, “systematic”, “iterations”, “nerve-wracking”. Natural collocations. Some less common phrases.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	7.5-8	Variety of complex structures: relative clauses, participle clauses (“jotting down”), passive voice. Mostly error-free. Flexible use of tenses.
Pronunciation	7.5-8	Clear và easy to understand. Natural stress và intonation patterns. Minimal L1 influence.

So Sánh Với Band 6-7

Khía cạnh	Band 6-7	Band 7.5-8
Vocabulary	“very important”, “made an outline”, “quite nervous”	“stakes were incredibly high”, “drafted a detailed outline”, “nerve-wracking”
Grammar	Simple past + basic conditionals	Past perfect, participle clauses, complex sentences
Ideas	Basic description của process	Detailed analysis với cultural context (“competitive academic landscape”)
Reflection	“This taught me planning is important”	“Reinforced my belief that outlining is essential” with deeper explanation

---

📝 Sample Answer – Band 8.5-9

Thời lượng: 2.5-3 phút đầy đủ

“I’d like to recount what I consider to be one of the most pivotal writing experiences of my academic journey – crafting a personal statement for my university applications approximately two years ago. I was applying to several prestigious business schools, and this essay would essentially serve as my intellectual calling card.

The gravity of this task cannot be overstated. In an increasingly competitive higher education landscape, particularly for international students from Vietnam, this personal statement represented far more than just words on paper – it was my opportunity to transcend the limitations of standardized test scores and grades, to breathe life into my application by conveying my unique perspective, experiences, and aspirations. The admissions officers would be inundated with thousands of applications from academically accomplished students; I needed my writing to resonate on a deeper level, to stand out amidst the sea of applicants.

My approach to preparation was both methodical and iterative. I began by immersing myself in successful personal statements from previous years, not to copy them, but to internalize the qualities that made them effective – authenticity, specificity, and a compelling narrative arc. I then engaged in what I call deep introspection, spending days reflecting on the experiences that had genuinely shaped my interest in business and my worldview. Rather than simply listing achievements, I wanted to weave together a coherent narrative that would reveal my character and intellectual curiosity.

The outlining phase proved crucial. I meticulously mapped out the structure: an engaging opening anecdote, a thoughtful exploration of how my experiences had crystallized my academic interests, specific reasons why each university aligned with my goals, and a forward-looking conclusion. This roadmap allowed me to write with clarity of purpose, ensuring each paragraph served a distinct function while contributing to the overarching narrative. I went through at least seven drafts, each time refining not just the language but the ideas themselves. I also solicited feedback from multiple sources – my English teacher, a university counselor, and even an alumnus of one of the programs – synthesizing their diverse perspectives to elevate the final product.

The emotional journey was quite profound. Upon submission, I experienced this curious amalgamation of relief, vulnerability, and cautious optimism. I had poured so much of myself into those pages that it felt almost exposing. The weeks of waiting were agonizing, filled with second-guessing and what-ifs. When the acceptance emails began arriving, the feeling was simply indescribable – not just happiness, but a deep sense of validation that the effort, the intellectual rigor, and the emotional investment had paid dividends.

In retrospect, this experience fundamentally shaped my understanding of effective writing. It crystallized for me that exceptional writing isn’t just about linguistic prowess or grammatical accuracy – it’s about strategic thinking, genuine self-reflection, and the courage to be authentic. The outlining process, which I had sometimes viewed as tedious, revealed itself to be the cornerstone of persuasive writing. It’s a lesson that has permeated all my subsequent academic work and one I believe will serve me well throughout my career.”

Phân Tích Band Điểm

Tiêu chí	Band	Nhận xét
Fluency & Coherence	8.5-9	Effortlessly fluent với sophisticated cohesive devices. Complex ideas expressed với clarity. Natural progression. Zero hesitation.
Lexical Resource	8.5-9	Extensive range: “pivotal”, “transcend”, “inundated with”, “resonate on a deeper level”, “introspection”, “crystallized”, “synthesizing”. Precise và sophisticated. Idiomatic language.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy	8.5-9	Full range of structures used naturally: complex participle phrases, inversions, perfect aspects. Virtually error-free.
Pronunciation	8.5-9	Fully comprehensible với native-like features. Effective use of stress, rhythm, intonation to convey meaning.

Tại Sao Bài Này Xuất Sắc

🎯 Fluency Hoàn Hảo:
Answer flows seamlessly từ introduction đến reflection. Không có hesitation hay repetition. Ideas được developed fully với natural transitions. Speaker maintains momentum trong suốt 3 phút mà không lose coherence.

📚 Vocabulary Tinh Vi:

• “intellectual calling card” – metaphor sáng tạo thay vì “introduction letter”
• “breathe life into my application” – idiomatic expression thay vì “make my application better”
• “inundated with” – precise verb thay vì “receive many”
• “curious amalgamation” – sophisticated way để express mixed feelings
• “paid dividends” – business idiom used appropriately

📝 Grammar Đa Dạng:

• Complex participle clauses: “ensuring each paragraph served a distinct function”
• Inversion for emphasis: “not to copy them, but to internalize…”
• Perfect aspects: “experiences that had shaped”
• Sophisticated conditionals và relative clauses embedded naturally

💡 Ideas Sâu Sắc:

• Cultural context về competitive landscape for Vietnamese students
• Philosophical reflection: “exceptional writing isn’t just about linguistic prowess”
• Metacognitive awareness: “deep introspection”, “intellectual rigor”
• Long-term impact: “permeated all my subsequent academic work”

Để hiểu rõ hơn về cách xử lý các tình huống thách thức trong học tập, bạn có thể tham khảo Describe a time when you had to troubleshoot a technical issue để thấy được sự tương đồng trong cách tiếp cận và giải quyết vấn đề một cách có hệ thống.

---

Follow-up Questions (Rounding Off Questions)

Examiner có thể hỏi thêm 1-2 câu ngắn sau Part 2 để transition sang Part 3:

Question 1: Do you still use outlining in your writing now?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, I do. I find it helpful for organizing my thoughts, especially for longer essays. It saves me time.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“Absolutely, it’s become second nature to me now. I’ve found that the initial investment of time in outlining yields significant returns in terms of both writing efficiency and overall coherence. Even for shorter pieces, I at least mentally map out the key points.”

---

Question 2: Would you recommend outlining to other students?

Band 6-7 Answer:
“Yes, I would. I think it’s a good method that helps you write better. Many successful students use this technique.”

Band 8-9 Answer:
“I’d certainly advocate for it, though with the caveat that different approaches work for different people. For most students, particularly those grappling with complex topics or working against tight deadlines, having a structural framework can be immensely valuable. It’s about finding what resonates with your cognitive style.”

Giám khảo IELTS đang kiểm tra cấu trúc và outline của bài luận

---

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-way Discussion

Tổng Quan Về Part 3

Thời gian: 4-5 phút

Đặc điểm: Part 3 là phần thảo luận sâu hơn về các khía cạnh abstract và theoretical của chủ đề. Examiner sẽ hỏi những câu hỏi requiring analysis, evaluation, comparison và speculation về tương lai.

Yêu cầu:

• Demonstrate ability to discuss abstract concepts
• Express và justify opinions
• Analyze causes và effects
• Compare different perspectives
• Speculate về trends và future developments

Chiến lược:

• Extend answers (aim for 4-6 câu minimum)
• Use discourse markers để structure thoughts
• Give examples từ broader society, không chỉ personal
• Acknowledge complexity và multiple perspectives
• Use tentative language khi speculate

Lỗi thường gặp của học viên Việt Nam:

• Trả lời quá ngắn (1-2 câu)
• Không provide sufficient support cho opinions
• Thiếu abstract/academic vocabulary
• Chỉ nói về personal experience thay vì societal issues
• Không demonstrate critical thinking

Các Câu Hỏi Thảo Luận Sâu

Theme 1: Education and Academic Skills

---

Question 1: Why do you think some students struggle with writing skills?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Cause analysis (Why question)
• Key words: struggle, writing skills, students
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple causes, provide explanation cho each, use examples từ education system

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think there are several reasons why students find writing difficult. First, many students don’t read enough books, so they don’t have good vocabulary. Second, the education system focuses too much on grammar rules instead of practical writing. Also, students don’t get enough practice writing in English. In my country, we spend most time studying for tests, not writing essays.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists multiple causes nhưng development còn shallow
• Vocabulary: Basic words (difficult, good vocabulary, too much, enough practice)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Addresses question với relevant points nhưng lacks depth of analysis và sophisticated language

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Well, I believe the challenges students face with writing are multifaceted. Fundamentally, many education systems place disproportionate emphasis on rote learning and memorization rather than cultivating genuine writing skills. Students are often drilled in grammatical rules in isolation without sufficient opportunity to apply them organically in extended writing contexts. Furthermore, there’s the issue of limited exposure to diverse writing styles and genres. Without extensive reading, students lack the linguistic reservoir from which to draw when expressing their own ideas. On a deeper level, writing requires higher-order thinking skills – the ability to synthesize information, construct arguments, and articulate complex thoughts – competencies that aren’t always explicitly taught. Compounding these factors is the reality that in many Asian educational contexts, including Vietnam, there’s tremendous pressure to perform well on standardized tests, which often prioritize receptive skills like reading over productive ones like writing.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Well-organized: Fundamental cause → Contributing factors → Deeper analysis → Contextual factors
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated và precise: “multifaceted”, “disproportionate emphasis”, “cultivating”, “linguistic reservoir”, “higher-order thinking skills”, “compounding these factors”
• Grammar: Complex structures: “Without extensive reading” (participle), relative clauses, passive constructions
• Critical Thinking: Multiple perspectives, moves từ surface level (practice) đến deeper causes (thinking skills, system issues)

💡 Key Language Features:

• Discourse markers: “Fundamentally”, “Furthermore”, “On a deeper level”, “Compounding these factors”
• Tentative language: “I believe”, “often”
• Abstract nouns: “cultivation”, “exposure”, “competencies”, “synthesis”
• Academic verbs: “place emphasis on”, “cultivate”, “synthesize”, “articulate”, “prioritize”

---

Question 2: How important is it to have good writing skills in today’s world?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Evaluation
• Key words: important, writing skills, today’s world
• Cách tiếp cận: Assess importance, provide reasons với contemporary examples, consider different contexts

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Writing skills are very important nowadays. In most jobs, people need to write emails and reports. If you can’t write well, it’s hard to communicate with colleagues and clients. Also, with social media, everyone is writing all the time. Good writing helps you express your ideas clearly and professionally. In the future, I think writing will be even more important because of technology.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: States importance → Workplace example → Social media point → Future comment
• Vocabulary: Common words (very important, hard to, clearly, professionally)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Relevant points nhưng lacks sophisticated vocabulary và depth of analysis. Ideas are somewhat predictable.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“I’d argue that writing skills have become increasingly crucial in our contemporary landscape, perhaps even more so than in previous generations. In the professional sphere, virtually every career path requires some degree of written communication – whether it’s crafting compelling proposals, articulating strategic visions, or simply maintaining clear correspondence with stakeholders. The ability to write persuasively and coherently can distinguish professionals in competitive fields. Beyond the workplace, we’re living in what some scholars call the ‘written society‘ – our digital interactions are predominantly text-based, from emails to instant messages to social media posts. Poor writing skills can undermine one’s professional credibility or even hinder social connections. More profoundly, writing is fundamentally a tool for thinking. The process of translating nebulous thoughts into structured prose actually helps us refine our ideas and develop intellectual rigor. Looking ahead, as AI handles more routine tasks, uniquely human skills like nuanced communication and creative expression will become even more valuable. So I’d contend that writing isn’t just a practical skill – it’s a cognitive competency that shapes how we think and interact with the world.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Thesis → Professional context → Social context → Deeper cognitive dimension → Future implications → Conclusive statement
• Vocabulary: Exceptional range: “increasingly crucial”, “contemporary landscape”, “crafting compelling proposals”, “distinguish professionals”, “predominantly text-based”, “undermine credibility”, “nebulous thoughts”, “nuanced communication”, “cognitive competency”
• Grammar: Varied structures: comparative forms (“more so than”), participles (“looking ahead”), relative clauses embedded naturally
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis (practical, social, cognitive), references to scholarly concepts, forward-looking perspective

💡 Key Language Features:

• Hedging: “I’d argue”, “perhaps”, “I’d contend”
• Academic references: “what some scholars call”
• Sophisticated connectors: “Beyond”, “More profoundly”, “Looking ahead”
• Precise vocabulary: “distinguish”, “undermine”, “hinder”, “refine”, “shapes”

---

Theme 2: Writing Techniques and Methods

Question 3: Do you think planning is necessary for all types of writing?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion question với nuance (need to consider exceptions)
• Key words: planning, necessary, all types of writing
• Cách tiếp cận: Balanced answer – recognize benefits nhưng acknowledge contexts where less planning is needed

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“I think planning is usually helpful, but maybe not always necessary. For long essays or reports, planning is very important because you need to organize many ideas. But for short things like emails or messages, you don’t need much planning. Also, some creative writing might not need strict planning because writers want to be spontaneous. So it depends on the situation and the type of writing.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: General statement → Example supporting → Exception → Conclusion
• Vocabulary: Basic (helpful, necessary, very important, strict planning)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Shows some ability to consider nuance nhưng analysis lacks sophistication. Uses simple examples.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“That’s an interesting question that requires some nuanced consideration. I’d say the necessity of planning exists on a spectrum depending on several factors. For high-stakes or complex writing tasks – such as academic papers, business proposals, or legal documents – structured planning is virtually indispensable. These genres require logical progression, coherent argumentation, and comprehensive coverage of points, all of which benefit immensely from methodical outlining. However, I’d acknowledge that planning takes different forms across contexts. For routine correspondence or informal writing, the planning might be mental rather than written – a quick cognitive organization before typing. Interestingly, some argue that excessive planning can actually stifle creativity, particularly in exploratory or expressive writing where the act of writing itself generates ideas. Writers like E.M. Forster famously said, ‘How do I know what I think until I see what I say?’ suggesting that writing can be a discovery process. That said, even in creative contexts, having at least a loose framework or sense of direction typically produces more cohesive results than completely unstructured composition. So in essence, while the degree and formality of planning may vary, some level of preparatory thought generally enhances the quality and efficiency of the writing process.”

Tương tự như việc lên kế hoạch cho bài viết, describe a decision you made that changed your life cũng cho thấy tầm quan trọng của việc suy nghĩ thấu đáo và chuẩn bị kỹ lưỡng trước khi hành động trong những quyết định quan trọng.

Phân tích:

• Structure: Sophisticated – acknowledges complexity → Main argument → Exception → Counter-perspective with literary reference → Qualification → Synthesis
• Vocabulary: Advanced: “nuanced consideration”, “spectrum”, “virtually indispensable”, “methodical outlining”, “stifle creativity”, “exploratory writing”, “unstructured composition”, “preparatory thought”
• Grammar: Complex: “all of which benefit…”, “suggesting that…”, embedded clauses
• Critical Thinking: Balanced view, literary reference, recognition of context-dependency, synthesizes different perspectives

💡 Key Language Features:

• Introducing nuance: “requires some nuanced consideration”, “exists on a spectrum”
• Concession: “However”, “That said”, “I’d acknowledge”
• Reference to authority: “E.M. Forster famously said”
• Qualifying language: “typically”, “generally”, “virtually”

---

Question 4: How has technology changed the way people write?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Change/Comparison (Present vs Past)
• Key words: technology, changed, way people write
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify multiple changes, discuss both benefits và drawbacks, provide contemporary examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Technology has changed writing in many ways. First, we can write much faster with computers than by hand. Also, spell-check helps us avoid mistakes. People can easily share their writing online through blogs and social media. But I think technology also has some negative effects. People write shorter messages and use more abbreviations. This might make their writing skills worse. Overall, technology makes writing easier but maybe less formal.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Lists changes → Mentions drawbacks → Conclusion
• Vocabulary: Common expressions (many ways, much faster, avoid mistakes, negative effects)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Covers both positive và negative aspects nhưng lacks sophisticated analysis và specific examples. Surface-level observations.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Technology has fundamentally transformed the writing landscape in ways that are both empowering and, arguably, somewhat concerning. On the positive side, word processing software has democratized the writing process – features like spell-checkers, grammar tools, and formatting options lower the technical barriers, allowing writers to focus more on content than mechanics. Moreover, the internet has created unprecedented opportunities for written expression and audience reach. Anyone can now publish their thoughts through blogs or social media, bypassing traditional gatekeepers like publishers. Collaborative writing has also been revolutionized through cloud-based platforms that enable real-time co-authoring.

Conversely, there are legitimate concerns about technology’s impact. The proliferation of instant messaging and social media has normalized extremely abbreviated and informal writing styles. Some linguists worry this constant exposure to truncated language might erode more formal writing competencies, particularly among younger generations. There’s also the issue of over-reliance on technology – when autocorrect handles all our spelling, are we atrophying that skill? Additionally, the sheer volume of digital writing we encounter daily might be diluting attention spans, making it harder to engage with sustained, complex prose.

Perhaps most intriguingly, AI writing assistants are now emerging that can generate entire essays or reports. This raises profound questions about authenticity and the future of writing as a distinctly human skill. On balance, while technology has made writing more accessible and versatile, we need to be mindful of preserving the rigor and depth that characterize excellent writing.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Masterful organization – Positive changes (detailed) → Negative impacts (detailed) → Emerging issues → Balanced conclusion
• Vocabulary: Exceptional: “fundamentally transformed”, “democratized”, “unprecedented opportunities”, “bypassing gatekeepers”, “proliferation of”, “truncated language”, “atrophying”, “diluting attention spans”, “profound questions”
• Grammar: Full range: passive constructions, participles, complex relative clauses, conditional implications
• Critical Thinking: Multi-dimensional analysis, considers different stakeholders (linguists’ concerns), addresses emerging trends (AI), balanced perspective

💡 Key Language Features:

• Contrasting ideas: “On the positive side… Conversely”, “while… we need to”
• Academic hedging: “arguably”, “some linguists worry”, “perhaps most intriguingly”
• Sophisticated verbs: “transformed”, “democratized”, “bypassing”, “revolutionized”, “normalized”, “erode”, “atrophying”, “diluting”
• Abstract nouns: “proliferation”, “authenticity”, “rigor”, “depth”, “versatility”

Công nghệ hiện đại đang ảnh hưởng đến kỹ năng viết của học sinh

---

Theme 3: Cultural and Educational Perspectives

Question 5: How do writing skills differ across cultures?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Comparison + Cultural analysis
• Key words: writing skills, differ, across cultures
• Cách tiếp cận: Identify specific cultural differences, explain underlying cultural values, use comparative examples

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Writing styles can be quite different in different countries. In Western countries, writers usually say their main point directly at the beginning. But in Asian countries like Vietnam, people often write in a more indirect way. They might give background information first before stating their opinion. Also, some cultures use more formal language than others. These differences come from different cultural values and educational systems.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: States difference → Gives examples → Mentions formality → Brief explanation
• Vocabulary: Common words (quite different, direct way, indirect way, formal language)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Identifies genuine differences nhưng explanation lacks depth. Could provide more specific examples và analysis.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“Writing conventions vary remarkably across cultures, reflecting deeper philosophical and rhetorical traditions. Perhaps most strikingly, there’s a fundamental difference in organizational approach between what scholars call ‘linear’ and ‘circular’ rhetorical styles. Anglo-American academic writing tends to privilege directness – the thesis is typically stated explicitly in the introduction, and arguments proceed in a logical, linear fashion. This reflects Enlightenment values of clarity and rational progression.

In contrast, many Asian writing traditions, influenced by Confucian principles, often employ what appears to Westerners as indirection. The main point might be inferred rather than explicitly stated, revealed gradually through contextual development. This approach values subtlety, harmony, and allowing readers to draw their own conclusions – it’s considered more sophisticated to suggest rather than assert. Japanese academic writing, for instance, often features the ‘Ki-Shō-Ten-Ketsu’ structure, which includes a deliberate turn or twist before the conclusion, quite unlike Western deductive patterns.

Furthermore, cultures differ in their treatment of formality and personal voice. Anglo-American academic writing increasingly accepts first-person perspectives and active voice, while some European and Asian traditions maintain stricter adherence to passive constructions and impersonal tone, viewing these as markers of objectivity.

These differences can create significant challenges for international students. A Vietnamese student writing in English might be penalized for what instructors view as ‘beating around the bush’, when in fact they’re applying deeply ingrained rhetorical conventions from their native tradition. Recognizing these cultural dimensions is crucial for both writers navigating cross-cultural contexts and educators assessing diverse student populations.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Exceptional – Introduction of concept → Main difference (organizational) with examples → Second dimension (formality) → Implications for international students → Conclusion emphasizing importance
• Vocabulary: Sophisticated academic language: “remarkably”, “rhetorical traditions”, “privilege directness”, “Confucian principles”, “contextual development”, “deductive patterns”, “stricter adherence to”, “deeply ingrained conventions”
• Grammar: Complex embedding, references to scholarly terminology, passive and active voice mixed purposefully
• Critical Thinking: Demonstrates deep cultural awareness, references specific traditions (Ki-Shō-Ten-Ketsu), considers implications, avoids cultural bias, synthesizes multiple dimensions

💡 Key Language Features:

• Academic terminology: “linear vs circular rhetorical styles”, “deductive patterns”, “rhetorical conventions”
• Cultural references: “Enlightenment values”, “Confucian principles”, specific Japanese structure
• Comparing cultures: “In contrast”, “Furthermore”, “while some… others”
• Showing complexity: “what appears to…”, “in fact they’re”

---

Question 6: Should schools place more emphasis on teaching writing skills?

🎯 Phân tích câu hỏi:

• Dạng: Opinion + Recommendation
• Key words: should, schools, more emphasis, teaching writing
• Cách tiếp cận: State position, provide justification, acknowledge counterarguments, suggest practical implementation

📝 Sample Answer – Band 6-7:

“Yes, I think schools should focus more on writing. Writing is an important skill for students’ future careers and academic success. Currently, many schools spend too much time on grammar tests instead of actual writing practice. Schools should give students more opportunities to write essays and get feedback. They could also teach different types of writing like emails, reports, and creative writing. This would help students become better writers.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Clear position → Reason → Current problem → Suggestions
• Vocabulary: Adequate but simple (important skill, too much time, more opportunities)
• Tại sao Band 6-7: Clear opinion với relevant support nhưng lacks sophisticated reasoning và detailed implementation ideas.

---

📝 Câu trả lời mẫu – Band 8-9:

“I’d strongly advocate for a substantial increase in the emphasis placed on writing instruction, though with some important caveats about how this should be implemented. Currently, many educational systems, including Vietnam’s, tend to treat writing as ancillary to other language skills or reduce it to grammar exercises and formulaic essay templates. This approach fundamentally misunderstands the multifaceted nature of writing as both a communicative tool and a cognitive process.

The rationale for enhanced writing instruction is compelling. First and foremost, writing is intrinsically linked to critical thinking – the act of organizing arguments, evaluating evidence, and articulating positions develops intellectual capacities that transcend language skills. Students who write regularly and thoughtfully become better analytical thinkers across all disciplines. Moreover, in our information-saturated era, the ability to synthesize complex information and communicate it clearly is increasingly valuable. From a practical standpoint, virtually every professional field requires written communication, yet many graduates enter the workforce woefully unprepared for the writing demands they’ll face.

However, I’d emphasize that ‘more emphasis’ shouldn’t simply mean ‘more writing assignments.’ What’s needed is systematic instruction in the writing process – from brainstorming and outlining through drafting, revision, and editing. Students need to understand that good writing is iterative, not produced in a single attempt. Furthermore, writing instruction should be integrated across the curriculum, not siloed in language classes. Science students should write lab reports, history students should analyze primary sources, and so forth – this contextualized approach makes writing purposeful rather than abstract.

Additionally, we need to leverage technology more effectively. Peer review platforms, collaborative writing tools, and even AI writing assistants (used appropriately) can provide students with more frequent feedback and diverse perspectives than any single teacher could offer. The key is developing students’ metacognitive awareness – helping them understand what constitutes effective writing and how to assess their own work.

To be realistic, this will require substantial investment in teacher training, as many educators weren’t taught to teach writing effectively. But given writing’s foundational role in both academic and professional success, I believe such investment would yield significant long-term dividends for individuals and society.”

Phân tích:

• Structure: Masterful – Position with caveat → Rationale (multiple dimensions) → Qualification on implementation → Practical suggestions → Realistic acknowledgment of challenges → Strong conclusion
• Vocabulary: Exceptional range: “strongly advocate for”, “ancillary”, “formulaic templates”, “multifaceted nature”, “intrinsically linked to”, “information-saturated era”, “woefully unprepared”, “iterative”, “siloed”, “metacognitive awareness”, “foundational role”, “yield significant dividends”
• Grammar: Full range used naturally and purposefully
• Critical Thinking: Multi-layered argument, addresses both why and how, acknowledges practical constraints, references different stakeholders (students, teachers, employers), proposes concrete solutions

💡 Key Language Features:

• Expressing strong opinion: “I’d strongly advocate for”, “the rationale is compelling”, “I believe”
• Qualifying: “with some important caveats”, “to be realistic”, “used appropriately”
• Structuring complex arguments: “First and foremost”, “Moreover”, “However”, “Additionally”, “Furthermore”
• Academic precision: “intrinsically linked to”, “transcend”, “iterative”, “metacognitive awareness”, “foundational role”

Nếu quan tâm đến việc phát triển kỹ năng viết học thuật trong bối cảnh giáo dục hiện đại, Describe a time when you received constructive feedback cũng minh họa tầm quan trọng của phản hồi và cải thiện liên tục trong quá trình học tập và phát triển kỹ năng.

---

Từ vựng và cụm từ quan trọng

Topic-Specific Vocabulary

Từ vựng/Cụm từ	Loại từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa tiếng Việt	Ví dụ	Collocation
outline	n/v	/ˈaʊtlaɪn/	dàn ý, phác thảo	I always create an outline before writing essays.	draft/sketch/prepare an outline, detailed/rough outline
coherent	adj	/kəʊˈhɪərənt/	mạch lạc, logic	Her argument was coherent and well-structured.	coherent argument, coherent structure, remain coherent
articulate	v	/ɑːˈtɪkjuleɪt/	diễn đạt rõ ràng	He articulated his ideas very clearly.	articulate ideas/thoughts/views, clearly articulate
brainstorming	n	/ˈbreɪnstɔːmɪŋ/	động não, tìm ý tưởng	Brainstorming helps generate creative ideas.	brainstorming session, engage in brainstorming
synthesize	v	/ˈsɪnθəsaɪz/	tổng hợp, kết hợp	Good writers synthesize information from multiple sources.	synthesize information/data/ideas, ability to synthesize
compelling	adj	/kəmˈpelɪŋ/	thuyết phục, hấp dẫn	She wrote a compelling argument.	compelling argument/evidence/reason, make a compelling case
iterate	v	/ˈɪtəreɪt/	lặp lại, làm nhiều lần	Writing is an iterative process.	iterative process, iterate through drafts
systematic	adj	/ˌsɪstəˈmætɪk/	có hệ thống	A systematic approach improves writing quality.	systematic approach/method, systematic planning
refine	v	/rɪˈfaɪn/	tinh chỉnh, hoàn thiện	I refined my essay through multiple drafts.	refine arguments/ideas/language, need to refine
rhetoric	n	/ˈretərɪk/	tu từ học, nghệ thuật hùng biện	Understanding rhetoric improves persuasive writing.	rhetorical strategy/device/question, master rhetoric
concise	adj	/kənˈsaɪs/	súc tích, ngắn gọn	Academic writing should be concise.	concise style/summary, keep it concise
verbose	adj	/vɜːˈbəʊs/	dài dòng, rườm rà	His writing tends to be verbose.	verbose style, overly verbose
formulate	v	/ˈfɔːmjuleɪt/	hình thành, phát triển (ý tưởng)	She formulated her thesis statement carefully.	formulate ideas/arguments/responses, clearly formulated
paraphrase	v	/ˈpærəfreɪz/	diễn giải, viết lại	Good writers paraphrase sources effectively.	paraphrase accurately, ability to paraphrase
critique	v/n	/krɪˈtiːk/	phê bình, đánh giá phê bình	Peer critique helps improve writing.	constructive critique, offer critique
rigor	n	/ˈrɪɡə(r)/	sự chặt chẽ, cẩn thận	Academic writing requires intellectual rigor.	intellectual/academic rigor, maintain rigor
nuanced	adj	/ˈnjuːɑːnst/	tinh tế, nhiều sắc thái	Her analysis was nuanced and sophisticated.	nuanced understanding/argument/perspective
proficiency	n	/prəˈfɪʃnsi/	sự thành thạo	Writing proficiency takes years to develop.	writing/language proficiency, demonstrate proficiency

Idiomatic Expressions & Advanced Phrases

Cụm từ	Nghĩa	Ví dụ sử dụng	Band điểm
put pen to paper	bắt đầu viết	Once I’ve outlined my ideas, I’m ready to put pen to paper.	7.5-8
beat around the bush	nói vòng vo, không đi thẳng vào vấn đề	Western academic writing values directness – don’t beat around the bush.	7.5-8
get one’s thoughts in order	sắp xếp ý nghĩ có trật tự	Outlining helps me get my thoughts in order before writing.	7-8
strike the right balance	đạt được sự cân bằng phù hợp	Good writing strikes the right balance between detail and conciseness.	8-9
resonate with readers	gây được tiếng vang, có tác động với độc giả	Authentic personal stories tend to resonate with readers.	8-9
map out one’s argument	phác thảo lập luận	Before drafting, I map out my argument in a detailed outline.	7.5-8
make or break	quyết định thành bại	A strong introduction can make or break an essay.	7.5-8
polish one’s writing	hoàn thiện, đánh bóng bài viết	The revision stage is when you polish your writing.	7-8
a double-edged sword	con dao hai lưỡi	Technology is a double-edged sword for writing – it helps but also creates dependencies.	8-9
the meat of the argument	phần cốt lõi của lập luận	After the introduction, move on to the meat of the argument.	7.5-8
breathe life into	thổi hồn vào, làm sống động	Good examples breathe life into abstract arguments.	8-9
go off on a tangent	đi chệch khỏi chủ đề	Without an outline, I tend to go off on tangents.	7.5-8

Discourse Markers (Từ Nối Ý Trong Speaking)

Để bắt đầu câu trả lời:

• 📝 Well, I’d say that… – Khi đưa ra quan điểm sau khi suy nghĩ
• 📝 From my perspective,… – Từ góc nhìn của tôi
• 📝 I’d argue that… – Tôi cho rằng (formal, academic)
• 📝 In my experience,… – Theo kinh nghiệm của tôi
• 📝 That’s an interesting question because… – Câu hỏi thú vị vì…

Để bổ sung ý:

• 📝 Furthermore,… – Hơn nữa (formal)
• 📝 Additionally,… – Thêm vào đó
• 📝 On top of that,… – Trên hết
• 📝 What’s more,… – Hơn thế nữa
• 📝 Moreover,… – Ngoài ra (formal)

Để đưa ra quan điểm cân bằng:

• 📝 On the one hand,… On the other hand,… – Một mặt… mặt khác…
• 📝 While it’s true that…, we also need to consider… – Mặc dù đúng là… chúng ta cũng cần xem xét…
• 📝 However,… – Tuy nhiên
• 📝 That said,… – Dù vậy
• 📝 Conversely,… – Ngược lại

Để nhấn mạnh ý quan trọng:

• 📝 Fundamentally,… – Về cơ bản
• 📝 Most importantly,… – Quan trọng nhất
• 📝 Crucially,… – Điều cốt yếu
• 📝 Perhaps most significantly,… – Có lẽ đáng kể nhất

Để kết luận:

• 📝 In essence,… – Về bản chất
• 📝 Ultimately,… – Cuối cùng thì
• 📝 All things considered,… – Xét mọi mặt
• 📝 On balance,… – Nhìn chung, cân nhắc tổng thể

Grammatical Structures Ấn Tượng

1. Conditional Sentences (Câu điều kiện):

Mixed conditional (Type 2 + 3):

• Formula: If + past simple, would + infinitive / If + past perfect, would + be + V-ing
• Ví dụ: “If I didn’t outline my essays, I would be wasting much more time during the writing process.”

Inversion (Đảo ngữ):

• Formula: Should/Were/Had + subject + verb
• Ví dụ: “Were I to write without planning, the result would likely be incoherent.”
• Ví dụ: “Had I not received feedback from my teacher, I wouldn’t have improved my writing skills.”

2. Relative Clauses (Mệnh đề quan hệ):

Non-defining relative clauses:

• Ví dụ: “Outlining, which many students overlook, is crucial for organizing complex arguments.”
• Ví dụ: “My English teacher, who has decades of experience, always emphasizes the importance of planning.”

Reduced relative clauses:

• Ví dụ: “Students struggling with writing often lack systematic planning strategies.”
• Ví dụ: “The feedback provided by my instructor helped me refine my arguments.”

3. Passive Voice (Câu bị động):

Impersonal passive:

• It is thought/believed/said/considered that…
• Ví dụ: “It is widely acknowledged that outlining improves writing coherence.”
• Ví dụ: “It has been suggested that traditional writing instruction overemphasizes grammar.”

4. Cleft Sentences (Câu chẻ):

What + clause:

• What I find most… is…
• Ví dụ: “What I find most challenging about writing is synthesizing diverse sources into a coherent argument.”

The thing that:

• Ví dụ: “The thing that distinguishes excellent writing from mediocre writing is clarity of expression.”

It is/was… that:

• Ví dụ: “It was through systematic practice that I developed my writing proficiency.”

5. Participle Clauses:

Present participle (-ing):

• Ví dụ: “Recognizing the importance of planning, I now spend considerable time on outlining.”
• Ví dụ: “Having outlined my main points, I felt much more confident approaching the essay.”

Perfect participle (having + past participle):

• Ví dụ: “Having received constructive feedback, I was able to substantially improve my draft.”

6. Emphasis Structures:

Not only… but also:

• Ví dụ: “Outlining not only saves time but also enhances the logical flow of arguments.”

It is… that (emphasis):

• Ví dụ: “It is the planning stage that determines the ultimate quality of the essay.”

---

Bài viết này đã cung cấp hướng dẫn toàn diện về cách trả lời các câu hỏi IELTS Speaking liên quan đến chủ đề writing skills và study methods. Từ Part 1 với các câu hỏi ngắn về thói quen cá nhân, đến Part 2 với cue card yêu cầu mô tả kinh nghiệm chi tiết, và Part 3 với các thảo luận sâu về giáo dục và văn hóa – tất cả đều được phân tích kỹ lưỡng với các bài mẫu theo nhiều band điểm khác nhau.

Những điểm quan trọng cần nhớ là: luôn mở rộng câu trả lời với lý do và ví dụ cụ thể, sử dụng từ vựng academic và sophisticated phù hợp với ngữ cảnh, thể hiện khả năng critical thinking bằng cách xem xét nhiều góc độ của vấn đề, và maintain natural fluency với discourse markers. Đặc biệt, việc outlining không chỉ là kỹ thuật viết mà còn phản ánh tư duy có tổ chức – một phẩm chất mà IELTS examiners đánh giá cao trong cả Writing lẫn Speaking tests.